
|
Report
Date : |
09.11.2006 |
|
Name : |
JUPITER ELECTRONICS |
|
|
|
|
Registered
Office : |
G – 414 Kailash Industrial Complex, Vikhroli Park Side
Road, Off L. B. S. Marg, Behind Godrej Colony, Vikhroli (West), Mumbai – 400 079,
Maharashtra |
|
|
|
|
Country
: |
India |
|
|
|
|
Financials
(as on) : |
31.03.2005 |
|
|
|
|
Date
of Incorporation : |
1989 |
|
|
|
|
Legal
Form : |
Sole Proprietory concern |
|
|
|
|
Line
of Business : |
Subject acts as manufacturers, agents and distributors of
Sensors and Transmitters (Pressure, Humidity and Temperature, Vibration and
Air Velocity). |
|
MIRA’s
Rating : |
Ba |
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered
normal. Capable to meet normal commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Maximum
Credit Limit : |
USD 10000 |
|
|
|
|
Status
: |
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
Payment
Behaviour : |
Usually
correct |
|
|
|
|
Litigation
: |
Clear |
|
|
|
|
Comments
: |
Subject is an established concern having satisfactory
track. Trade relations are fair. Payments are usually correct & as per
commitments. The concern can be considered normal for business dealings
at usual trade terms & conditions |
|
Registered
Office : |
G – 414-416, Kailash Industrial Complex, Vikhroli Park
Side Road, Off L. B. S. Marg, Behind Godrej Colony, Vikhroli (West), Mumbai –
400 079, Maharashtra, India |
|
Tel.
No.: |
91-22-25185474
/ 25170795 / 55551606 / 25000652 |
|
Fax
No.: |
91-22-25000112 |
|
E-Mail
: |
|
|
Website
: |
|
|
|
|
|
Factory
1 : |
32, Pilot
Industrial Estate, Navghar Vasai Road (East), Thane – 401 202, Maharashtra |
|
Name : |
Mr. Bipin V. Ghelani |
|
Designation
: |
Proprietor |
|
Date
of Birth/Age : |
58 years |
|
Qualification
: |
B. E. (Electrical) |
|
Experience
: |
34 years |
|
Line
of Business : |
Subject acts as manufacturers, agents and distributors of
Sensors and Transmitters (Pressure, Humidity and Temperature, Vibration and
Air Velocity). |
|
|
|
|
Product
: |
v Air Flow Sensors v Air Flow Transmitters v Air Velocity Transmitters v Gas Sensors v Humidity Sensors v Humidity Transmitters v Pressure Sensors v Pressure Switches v Pressure Transmitters v Sensors v Temperature Sensing Devices v Temperature Sensors v Temperature Transmitters v Transmitters |
|
|
|
|
Agencies
Held : |
v
Honywell
Sensym-ICT Corporation, U.S.A. v
Rotronics
AG, Switzerland v
Istag,
Switzerland v
Schemidt
Fein Technique, Germany v
Cambridge
Accusense Inc., U.S.A. v
Autotrans
Inc, U.S.A. v
World
Magnetics Inc, U.S.A. v
Measurement
Specialities Inc, U.S.A. v
I.
S. T. AG Switzerland |
|
|
|
|
Imports
from : |
Germany, USA and Switzerland |
|
|
|
|
Terms
: |
|
|
Selling : |
Credit (90 to 120 days) |
|
|
|
|
Purchasing : |
Credit (30/60 days) & D/A |
|
Customers
: |
Manufacturers,
trading firms and government bodies. |
|
|
|
|
No. of
Employees : |
12 |
|
|
|
|
Bankers
: |
Ř
Standard
Chartered Bank Ghatkopar, Mumbai, Maharashtra Ř
Andhra
Bank, Ghatkopar Mumbai, Maharashtra Ř
Karnataka
Bank Limited Overseas Branch, Mumbai – 400 021, Maharashtra |
|
|
|
|
Facilities : |
Fund Based : Rs. 2.000 Millions |
|
|
|
|
Banking Relations : |
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
Auditors
: |
Mr.
Bharat Sheth Chartered
Accountants Mumbai, Maharashtra |
|
|
|
|
Associates/Subsidiaries
: |
Ř
Galaxy
Enterprises 901/6D, Damodar Park, L. B. Shastry Marg, Ghatkopar (West), Mumbai – 400 086, Maharashtra -- Manufacturers, Agents and Distributors of Sensors and
Transmitters (Pressure, Humidy and Temperature, Vibration and Air Velocity). |
|
Capital
Investment : |
|
|
Owned : |
Rs. 2.000
Millions |
|
Borrowed : |
- |
|
Total : |
Rs. 2.000 Millions |
FINANCIAL DATA
[all figures are in Rupees Millions]
|
Particulars |
31.03.2005 |
31.03.2004 |
31.03.2003 |
|
Sales
Turnover |
35.000 |
30.000 |
17.500 |
Expected Sales March 2006 Rs. 50.000 Millions
It is in
trade terms with :-
v
Krone
Marshall India Limited, Pune, Maharashtra
v
Associated
Capsules Group, Kandivali, Mumbai
v
Palm
Machinery Private Limited, Kandivali, Mumbai
v
Bhabha
Atomic Research Centre, Chembur, Mumbai
v
Centre
for Advance Technology, Indore, Madhya Pradesh
v
Sandoz
India Limited, Mumbai
v
Lakshmi
Machine Works, Limited, Coimbtore.
CMT REPORT
[Corruption, Money laundering & Terrorism]
The Public Notice information has been collected from
various sources including but not limited to: The Courts, India Prisons
Service, Interpol, etc.
1] INFORMATION ON DESIGNATED PARTY
No
records exist designating subject or any of its beneficial owners, controlling
shareholders or senior officers as terrorist or terrorist organization or whom
notice had been received that all financial transactions involving their assets
have been blocked or convicted, found guilty or against whom a judgement or
order had been entered in a proceedings for violating money-laundering,
anti-corruption or bribery or international economic or anti-terrorism sanction
laws or whose assets were seized, blocked, frozen or ordered forfeited for
violation of money laundering or international anti-terrorism laws.
2] Court Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that
subject is or was the subject of any formal or informal allegations,
prosecutions or other official proceeding for making any prohibited payments or
other improper payments to government officials for engaging in prohibited
transactions or with designated parties.
3] Asset Declaration :
No
records exist to suggest that the property or assets of the subject are derived
from criminal conduct or a prohibited transaction.
4] Record on Financial Crime :
Charges or
conviction registered against subject: None
5] Records on Violation of
Anti-Corruption Laws :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
6] Records on Int’l Anti-Money
Laundering Laws/Standards :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
7] Criminal Records
No available
information exist that suggest that subject or any of its principals have been
formally charged or convicted by a competent governmental authority for any
financial crime or under any formal investigation by a competent government
authority for any violation of anti-corruption laws or international anti-money
laundering laws or standard.
8] Affiliation with Government :
No record exists to
suggest that any director or indirect owners, controlling shareholders,
director, officer or employee of the company is a government official or a
family member or close business associate of a Government official.
9] Compensation Package :
Our market survey
revealed that the amount of compensation sought by the subject is fair and
reasonable and comparable to compensation paid to others for similar services.
10] Press Report
:
No press reports / filings exists on the subject.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MIRA INFORM as part of its Due Diligence do provide comments
on Corporate Governance to identify management and governance. These factors
often have been predictive and in some cases have created vulnerabilities to
credit deterioration.
Our Governance Assessment focuses principally on the
interactions between a company’s management, its Board of Directors,
Shareholders and other financial stakeholders.
CONTRAVENTION
Subject is not known to have contravened any existing local
laws, regulations or policies that prohibit, restrict or otherwise affect the
terms and conditions that could be included in the agreement with the subject.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.44.65 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.85.03 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.56.98 |
|
SCORE FACTORS |
RANGE |
POINTS |
|
HISTORY |
1~10 |
5 |
|
PAID-UP
CAPITAL |
1~10 |
5 |
|
OPERATING
SCALE |
1~10 |
5 |
|
FINANCIAL
CONDITION |
|
|
|
--BUSINESS
SCALE |
1~10 |
5 |
|
--PROFITABILIRY |
1~10 |
5 |
|
--LIQUIDITY |
1~10 |
5 |
|
--LEVERAGE |
1~10 |
5 |
|
--RESERVES |
1~10 |
5 |
|
--CREDIT
LINES |
1~10 |
5 |
|
--MARGINS |
-5~5 |
- |
|
DEMERIT
POINTS |
|
|
|
--BANK CHARGES |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--LITIGATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--OTHER
ADVERSE INFORMATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
MERIT
POINTS |
|
|
|
--SOLE
DISTRIBUTORSHIP |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--EXPORT
ACTIVITIES |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--AFFILIATION |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--LISTED |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--OTHER
MERIT FACTORS |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
TOTAL |
|
45 |
This
score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk and to set the amount of
credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite of weighted scores
obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The assessed factors
and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit
history (10%) Market
trend (10%) Operational
size (10%)
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound
financial base with the strongest capability for timely payment of interest
and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working
capital. No caution needed for credit transaction. It has above average
(strong) capability for payment of interest and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base
are regarded healthy. General unfavourable factors will not cause fatal
effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered
normal. Capable to meet normal commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable
factors carry similar weight in credit consideration. Capability to overcome
financial difficulties seems comparatively below average/normal. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent.
Repayment of interest and principal sums in default or expected to be in
default upon maturity |
Limited with full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists.
Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not recommended |