
|
Report Date : |
17.01.2007 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
E.M.A.
DIAMOND MANUFACTURING LTD. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
|
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
28.12.1993 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private
Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Processors, importers,
exporters and marketers of diamonds. |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
A |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded
healthy. General unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect.
Satisfactory capability for payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
Status : |
Good |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
Correct Name
E.M.A. DIAMOND MANUFACTURING LTD.
address
Diamonds Exchange,
Telephone 972 3 575 05 99
Fax 972 3 575 99 68
HISTORY
A private limited company,
incorporated as per file No. 51-190486-4 on the 28.12.1993. We are informed by subject's General Manager,
that as of 31.12.2006 subject ceased all activities in
SHARE CAPITAL
Authorized share capital of
SHAREHOLDERS
1. Jeremy Medding - 33.33%,
2. Meir Alon - 33.33%,
3. Amram Hochstein - 33.33%.
DIRECTORS & JOINT
GENERAL MANAGERS
1. Jeremy Medding,
2. Meir Alon.
BUSINESS
Until December 2006 operated in
Sales were both for export and to
the local market.
Also have other related operations
(e.g. processing, marketing, etc.) abroad.
During 2006 all diamond
activities in
Also gradually, all above
mentioned foreign activities are to be sold to the shareholders' affiliated
companies or other non- affiliated third parties.
Operating from rented office premises
in
EMA Group also operating from a
plant in
Having no employees in
MEANS
Financial data not forthcoming,
however has been known to be financially strong.
As of 2004 subject became a DTC
Sight holder (special concession from DE BEERS).
There are 3 charges for unlimited
amounts registered on the company's assets, in favor of local banks.
ANNUAL SALES
1999 sales for
export reported to
be US$ 61,000,000.
2000 sales for
export reported to
be US$ 75,000,000.
2001 sales for
export reported to
be US$ 53,000,000.
2002 sales for
export reported to
be US$ 61,000,000.
2003 sales for
export reported to
be US$ 67,000,000.
2004 sales for
export reported to
be US$ 73,000,000.
EMA's consolidated sales in 2004
reported to be US$ 100,000,000.
2005 sales for
export reported to
be US$ 76,000,000.
2006 sales claimed to be US$ 50,000,000, most for
export. (2006 sales diminished as a result of the gradual split of activities
as noted above).
OTHER COMPANIES
E.M.A. DIAMOND MANUFACTURING AND
EXPORT (2006) LTD.
BANKERS
Israel Union Bank Ltd., Diamonds
Exchange Branch (No. 062),
Mizrahi
Tefahot Bank Ltd.,
CHARACTER AND
REPUTATION
Nothing unfavorable learnt.
According to the report published
by the Israel Supervisor on Diamonds in the Ministry of Industry and Trade,
subject was ranked 13th in the 2005 list of
In December 2004 it was published
that as of 1.2.2005 subject is to merge its
It was also reported that EMA’s
diamond main manufacturing facilities are located in
In 2004, RAMA’s turnover (owned
by the Ratzersdorfer family) reached US$ 50 million alone. Subject hopes, that
as a result of the merger, the US$ 100 million combined sales turnover in 2004
will double to US$ 200 million in 2005.
In March 2006 it was reported
that Jeremy Medding, one of subject's owners, opened a subsidiary in
"Le Lumiere", of EMA
Diamonds’ hearts and arrows flagship brand was launched in
April 2005 De Beers' Diamond
Trading Company (DTC) said it planned to expand its "Forevermark
program", a unique inscription on selected diamonds of 0.30 carats and above,
which was launched as a pilot in Hong Kong in September 2004". As of
2005, the Forevermark was sold in over 100 outlets in
According to a report from
November 2006, the diamonds branch is on the verge of a significant
recuperation after the deep crisis it got into, the worst one for decades,
which affected the profitability of Israeli diamond businesses. World sales
towards Thanksgiving Day grew by 10% comparing to 2005. That already led to a
rise in rough diamonds.
According to the Ministry of
Industry and Trade, the local diamonds branch managed to stabilize the total
volume of export of cut diamonds during
Total (net) export of cut
diamonds from Israel in 2006 reached US$ 6.610 billion, a mere decrease of 1.5%
from 2005 (US$ 6.709 billion). Exports (net) of rough diamonds were US$ 2.701
billion, a 23.2% decrease from 2005 (US$ 3.517 billion, which was a 20.6%
increase from 2004).
Import of rough diamonds (net)
also fell in 2006 by 11.4% (from 2005) to US$ 4.709 billion, while import of
cut diamonds (net) increased in 2006 by 3.3% reaching US$ 4.025 billion.
The
SUMMARY
Notwithstanding the changes in
subject's Group, in view of subject's character and reputation, subject is
considered good for trade engagements.
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial
base with the strongest capability for timely payment of interest and
principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No
caution needed for credit transaction. It has above average (strong)
capability for payment of interest and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are
regarded healthy. General unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect.
Satisfactory capability for payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal.
Capable to meet normal commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors
carry similar weight in credit consideration. Capability to overcome
financial difficulties seems comparatively below average/normal. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of
interest and principal sums in default or expected to be in default upon
maturity |
Limited with full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution
needed to be exercised |
Credit not recommended |
|
NR |
In view of the lack of information, we
have no basis upon which to recommend credit dealings |
No Rating |
|