MIRA
INFORM REPORT
|
Report Date : |
27.07.2007 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
ROCKFORD INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
|
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
16 June 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Liability Company |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
NR |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
NR |
In view of the lack of information, we have no basis upon which to
recommend credit dealings |
No Rating |
|
Status : |
Undetermined |
REGISTERED NAME
ROCKFORD INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD
INCORPORATED
16 June 2006
REGISTERED ADDRESS
SHARECAPITAL
$100
SHAREHOLDERS
JAIN, Ashish
3,
IVANHOE, VIC
3079 holds 100 shares
DIRECTORS
JAIN, Ashish
3,
IVANHOE, VIC
3079
SECRETARY
JAIN, Ashish
3,
IVANHOE, VIC
3079
REGISTERED CHARGES
None on record
BUSINESS STRUCTURE
TRADING ADDRESS
3,
IVANHOE, VIC
3079
TELEPHONE Not determined
FACSIMILE Not determined
BANK
Not determined
EMPLOYEES
Not determined
BACKGROUND
The subject was incorporated in
OPERATIONS
Details pertaining to the subjects operations were unable to be obtained for the current enquiry.
Activities are conducted from premises located at the above listed trading address.
ADVERSE
A search of the of Baycorp Advantage Limited failed to trace any litigation listed against the subject at that date.
FINANCES
The subject is not required to lodge financial statements with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
During the current investigation, contact with the subject or its principals was unable to be established.
A search of records failed to trace any contact details under the subjects style. A further search of records failed to trace any contact details for Director, Ashish Jain.
As a result, details pertaining to the subjects operating, trading and financial position were unable to be obtained.
Please note, should further contact details be provided, this report will be updated and forwarded to your office.
TRADE SURVEY
During the current investigation, contact with the subjects principals was unable to be established.
Subsequently details pertaining to the company’s suppliers were unable to be obtained and a trade survey could not be conducted.
SUMMARY
The subject was incorporated in
During the current investigation, contact with the subject or its principals was unable to be established.
As a result, details pertaining to the subjects operating, trading and financial position were unable to be obtained.
Please note, should further contact details be provided, this report will be updated and forwarded to your office.
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest capability
for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors carry similar weight in credit
consideration. Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average/normal. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
NR |
In view of the lack of information, we have no basis upon which to
recommend credit dealings |
No Rating |
|
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)