%20LTD%2012-Mar-2007_files/image002.jpg)
|
Report Date : |
12th March, 2007 |
IDENTIFICATION
DETAILS
|
Name : |
MARVAL GEMS (ISRAEL) LTD. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
3 Jabotinski
Street, Diamond Exchange, Shimshon Building, Ramat Gan 52520 Israel |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Israel |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
09.07.2000 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
51-297725-7 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Importers, exporters and marketers of diamonds. |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Regular |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
MARVAL GEMS
(ISRAEL) LTD.
Telephone 972
3 575 56 67
Mobile 972
54 397 59 47
Fax 972 3 575
56 68
3 Jabotinski
Street
Diamond Exchange,
Shimshon Building
RAMAT GAN 52520 ISRAEL
A private limited
company, incorporated as per file No. 51-297725-7 on the 9.7.2000.
Authorized share
capital of NIS 39,100.00 divided into: 39,100 ordinary shares, of NIS 0.0001
each, of which shares amounting to NIS 100.00 were issued.
1. Rajush
Modo, 85%,
2. Mahta
Subashi Fonnit, 15%.
Although no notice to this effect has so far been noted in the Registrar of
Companies, we are informed that shareholders No. 2 has left subject and is no
longer a shareholder.
Hence, in practice, subject is fully owned by Rajush Modo.
1. Rajush
Modo, General Manager,
2. Mahta
Subashi Fonnit (still registered, though in practice no longer in subject).
Importers,
exporters and marketers of diamonds.
Subject is affiliated
to MILESTONE of India.
Operating from
office premises in 3 Jabotinski Street, Diamond Exchange, Shimshon Building,
Ramat Gan.
Number of
employees not forthcoming.
Financial data not
forthcoming.
There are no
charges registered on the company's assets.
Sales figures not
forthcoming.
Mizrachi Tefahot
Ltd., Diamond Business Center Branch (No. 466), Ramat Gan.
Nothing
unfavorable learnt.
Subject’s owner and General Manager, Mr.
Modo, refused to disclose any details on his business.
Subject is
affiliated to MILESTONE of India, manufacturers and exporters of diamonds, and
also a DE BEERS sightholders. Subject represents and markets also MILESTONE's
goods.
We received a
positive recommendation from subject's bankers.
We spoke with
subject's account manager, who informed us that their bank works with subject
for 5 years, their account is well-managed, and they are most reliable clients.
According to a
report from November 2006, the diamonds branch is on the verge of a significant
recuperation after the deep crisis it got into, the worst one for decades,
which affected the profitability of Israeli diamond businesses. World sales
towards Thanksgiving Day grew by 10% comparing to 2005. That already led to a
rise in rough diamonds.
According to the
Ministry of Industry and Trade, the local diamonds branch managed to stabilize
the total volume of export of cut diamonds during 2006, a year that witnessed
many local and global challenges, and end in the same level as 2005. In rough
diamonds a decrease was noted, due to marketing motives, and as high prices
made the trade in rough diamonds less attractive.
Total (net) export
of cut diamonds from Israel in 2006 reached US$ 6.610 billion, a mere decrease
of 1.5% from 2005 (US$ 6.709 billion). Exports (net) of rough diamonds were US$
2.701 billion, a 23.2% decrease from 2005 (US$ 3.517 billion, which was a 20.6%
increase from 2004).
Import of rough diamonds
(net) also fell in 2006 by 11.4% (from 2005) to US$ 4.709 billion, while import
of cut diamonds (net) increased in 2006 by 3.3% reaching US$ 4.025 billion.
The USA is the
main market for Israel’s export of cut diamonds (over 50%). The secondary markets
are Hong Kong (around 20%), Belgium (around 10%), Switzerland and the UK.
Since the
beginning of 2007, import rough diamonds to Israel noted a 7.8% decrease
comparing to the parallel period in 2006, due to a shortage in world markets,
following the lowering in sales by DE BEERS and the tough winter in Africa that
hurt mining. Nevertheless, the officials in the branch reported 11.7% increase
in import of polished diamonds in January 2007.
In the first 2
months of 2007, export (net) of cut diamonds rose by 9.2% comparing to the
parallel period in 2006, summing up to US$ 1.349 billion. Export of rough
diamonds (net) also witnessed an increase.
Notwithstanding
the refusal to disclose financial information, considered good for trade
engagements.
RATING
EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable
factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of
interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors carry similar weight in credit
consideration. Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems
comparatively below average/normal. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
NR |
In view of the lack of information, we have no basis upon which to
recommend credit dealings |
No Rating |
|
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)