![]()
|
Report Date : |
15.10.2007 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
Chukha Hydro Power Corporation |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
Chukha, Thimpu |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
1978 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Corporation |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Generation of Hydro Power. |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors carry similar weight in credit
consideration. Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems
comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
No Complaints |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
name
Chukha Hydro Power Corporation
Chukha, Thimpu
Telephones : 975 5 325095 / 325096
Email : chukhahydropower@druknet.bt
Legal Status
Corporation
Name of Directors
Yeshey Dorji (MD)
Kinzang Tobjoy
A Kumar
Shareholders
All shares held
by
Auditor
Not known
Bankers
Bank of
Bhutan National
Bank,
Business
See details below
Premises
- do -
No. of Staff
275 nos.
Trade Reference
Financial
See details below
Trade Terms
Purchase - L/C for 45 days, Credit – 45 days
Sales - L/C for 30 days, Credit 30 days
Remarks
Well established, respectable and reputed concern. Trade relations are fare.
Chukha Hydropower Corporation (CHPC)
The current
operational - Chukha Hydropower Corporation (CHPC) was entirely funded by the Government of India. The
construction of the Chukha Hydroelectric plant was started in 1978. It
was successfully commissioned in 1988.
The CHPC has a 40 metre (130 ft.) high diversion dam, located about 1.60 km upstream of the point of confluence of Ti-Chu ( river) with Wong Chu (river) where the river bed lies at + 1689 metre having maximum pond level of + 1716.20 metre. It has 6560 metre (21517 ft.) long head race tunnel, 71.5 cumecs (250 cusecs) capacity, taking off on the left bank and conveying the waters to an underground power house.
The project
was handed over to Bhutanese management in June 1991. 70% of power
generated by this project is exported to
During the period between April 2003 to March 2004, a
total of 1494.75 MUs of power was exported to
Project details
Total Energy Output: 1320 MUs on the basis of average flow.
Cost on completion : Nu. 2460 Million
Generation Tariff : Nu. 1.50 per unit to be raised to Nu. 2.00 from January 1, 2005
Source:
Net Head: 435 m
Capacity : 4 x 84 MW
Date of Commissioning : 1988
Beneficiaries:
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors carry similar weight in credit
consideration. Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems
comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
NR |
In view of the lack of information, we have no basis upon which to
recommend credit dealings |
No Rating |
|
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)