![]()
|
Report Date : |
24.09.2007 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
P.T. GOVINDO
UTAMA |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
|
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
11 January 1995 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Limited Liability Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Property Development and Management. |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Maximum Credit Limit : |
US$ 1,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Regular |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
Name of Company
P.T. GOVINDO UTAMA
Address
Head Office
Jalan A. Yani Km.
2
Komplek Simpang
Ulin
Phone -
(62-21) 3255850 (Hunting)
Fax. - (62-21) 3272345
Building Area - 3 storey
Factory Space - 15,000 sq. meters
Region -
Status - Owned
Date of
Incorporation
11 January 1995
Legal Form
P.T. (Perseroan
Terbatas) or Limited Liability Company
Company Reg. No.
The Ministry of Justice and Human Rights
No. W12-00061
HT.01.04.TH.2006
Dated 8 November
2006
Company Status
National Private Company
Permit by the
Government Department
NPWP No. 1.647.778.8-731
Related Company
P.T. CENTRA BANGUNAN JAYA (General Contracting)
CAPITAL AND
OWNERSHIP
Capital Structure :
Authorized Capital
: Rp.
50,000,000,000.-
Issued Capital : Rp.
50,000,000,000.-
Paid up Capital : Rp.
50,000,000,000.-
Shareholders/Owners :
a. Mr. Dicky Gunawan - Rp. 47,500,000,000.-
Address : Jl. Kampung Melayu Darat No. 38
b. Mrs. Meina Indra -
Rp. 1,250,000,000.-
Address : Jl. Veteran No. 04 B Rt. 034
c. Mrs. Go Tjhioe Shia - Rp. 1,250,000,000.-
Address : Jl. Dewi Shinta No. 10 Rt. 025
BUSINESS ACTIVITIES
Lines of Business:
Property Development and Management
Production Capacity
Project Name
Mall 3th Floor
Total Investment
a. Equity Capital - Rp. 50.0
billion
b. Loan Capital - Rp. 20.0
billion
c. Total
Investment -
Rp. 70.0 billion
Started Operation
July 2006
Brand Name
None
Technical
Assistance
None
Number of Employee
121 persons
Marketing Area
Local - 100%
Main Customer
Tenant
(Hypermarket, Matahari supermarket) electronic trading, food court etc.
Market Situation
Very Competitive
Main Competitors
a. P.T. RANCA GADING SAKTI
b. P.T. PUTRA
INVESTAMA
c. P.T. PUTRA
UTAMA MANDIRI
d. P.T. PERKASA
UTAMA
Business Trend
Growing
BANKER, AUDITOR
& LITIGATION
Bankers :
a. P.T. Bank
b. P.T. Bank MANDIRI Tbk
Auditor :
Internal Auditor
Litigation :
No litigation record in our database
FINANCIAL FIGURE
Annual Sales (estimated) :
2006 – Rp. 112.0
billion (July-December)
2007 – Rp. 120.0
billion (January-August)
Net Profit (Loss)
:
2006 – Rp. 10.0 billion (July-December)
2007 – Rp. 11.0 billion (January-August)
Payment Manner :
Average
Financial Comments :
Satisfactory
KEY EXECUTIVES
Board of
Management :
President Director - Mr. Dicky Gunawan
Director -
Mrs. Go Tjhioe Shia
Board of
Commissioners :
Commissioner - Mrs. Meina Indra
Signatories
:
President
Director (Mr. Dicky Gunawan) or the Director (Mrs. Go Tjhioe Shia) which must
be approved by the Supervisory Board.
CAPABILITIES
Management
Capability :
Good
Business Morality
Good
Credit Risk
Average
Credit Recommendation
Credit should be proceeded with monitor
Proposed Credit
Limit
Small amount –
periodical review
Maximum Credit Limit
US$ 1,500,000.- on the 90 days of payments
OVERALL PERFOMANCE
P.T. GOVINDO UTAMA (P.T. GI) was established in
P.T. GU has been operating since July 2006 in the field of
property development and management. The company manages
The protracted economic crisis coupled with the plummeting
exchange rate of the rupiah to the hard foreign currencies have resulted in a
deep slump of the property business in
According to a property business observer firm, Panangian, the occupancy rate of store buildings and shopping centers in 2004 was registered at 76%, dropping to 80% in 2005 and projected to rise to 85% in 2006. The following table shows Analyses and Forecasts of the commercial property market for the 2002-2006 period. P.T. GU's has quite good prospects in view of the very strategic location of its project in the leading shopping centre district of Banjarmasin City.
|
Year |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|
5 Star Hotel |
29% |
27% |
34% |
42% |
47% |
|
Condominium |
45% |
45% |
48% |
52% |
55% |
|
Apartment |
61% |
65% |
67% |
69% |
73% |
|
Town Houses |
50% |
54% |
56% |
58% |
65% |
|
CBD Offices |
60% |
65% |
68% |
70% |
75% |
|
Non CBD offices |
70% |
68% |
70% |
74% |
79% |
|
Shopping Centre |
74% |
73% |
76% |
80% |
85% |
Source :
Panangian Simanungkalit & Associates
Until this time P.T. GU has not been registered with Indonesian
Stock Exchange, so that they shall not obliged to announce their financial
statement. We observed that total sales turnover of the company in the first
operation from July to December 2006 amounted to Rp. 112.0 billion increased to
Rp. 120.0 billion from January to August 2007. The operation in 2007
(January-August) yielded an estimated net profit at least Rp. 11.0 billion and
the company has an estimated total networth at least Rp. 135.5 billion. It is
projected that total sales turnover of the company will increase at least 4% in
2008. So far, we did not hear that the company having been black listed by the
Central Bank (Bank
The management of P.T. GU is led by Mr. Dicky Gunawan (43), a businessman and professional manager with 8 years of experience in property development and management. The management of the company is handled by professional managers having wide relation with private businessmen within and outside the country and with the government sectors as well. We observed that management’s reputation in said business is fairly good. So far, we did not hear that the company’s management involved in a dirty business practice or detrimental cases that settled in the country. The company’s litigation record is clean and it has not registered with the black list of Bank of Indonesia. PT. GOVINDO UTAMA is fairly good for business transaction. However, in view of the unstable economic condition in the country we recommend to treat prudently in extending a loan to the company.
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors carry similar weight in credit
consideration. Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
NR |
In view of the lack of information, we have no basis upon which to
recommend credit dealings |
No Rating |
|
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)