MIRA
INFORM REPORT
|
Report Date : |
31.03.2008 |
IDENTIFICATION
DETAILS
|
Name : |
THE UNIFORM PEOPLE |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
6/17, Howson Road, Opposite Bharat Cold Drink House, Deolali Camp,
Nashik 422401, Maharashtra |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
India |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.03.2007 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Sole Proprietory Concern |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Manufacturer of (uniforms) garments and textile products required in
Army, Air-force, Hospitals, Hotels, Schools, Restaurants, Industries,
Security Agencies and all other kinds of Industries. |
RATING &
COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors carry similar weight in credit
consideration. Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems
comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
Maximum Credit Limit : |
USD 48000 |
|
|
|
|
Status : |
Small Concern |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Slow |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
|
|
|
|
Comments : |
Subject is a relatively small concern in its field. Trade relations
are fair. Scale of activity is limited. Payments are reported as slow but
correct. The concern can be considered for small to mediocre business dealings
at usual trade terms and conditions. |
INFORMATION PARTED
BY
|
Name : |
Mr. Pinkesh Kamwani |
|
Designation : |
Proprietor |
|
Contact No.: |
91-9890911626 |
|
Date : |
02.04.2008 |
LOCATIONS
|
Registered Office : |
6/17, Howson Road, Opposite Bharat Cold Drink House, Deolali Camp,
Nashik 422401, Maharashtra, India |
|
Tel. No.: |
91-253-2491626 |
|
Mobile No.: |
91-9890911626 |
|
Fax No.: |
91-253-249965 |
|
E-Mail : |
|
|
Website : |
www.theuniformpeople.co.in |
|
Area : |
1600 sq ft |
|
Location : |
Owned |
SOLE PROPRIETOR
|
Name : |
Mr. Pinkesh Kamwani |
|
Designation : |
Proprietor |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
28 years |
|
Qualification : |
Graduate |
BUSINESS DETAILS
|
Line of Business : |
Manufacturer of (uniforms) garments and textile products required in
Army, Air-force, Hospitals, Hotels, Schools, Restaurants, Industries,
Security Agencies and all other kinds of Industries. |
|
|
|
|
Terms : |
|
|
Selling : |
Cash / Credit (30 days) |
|
|
|
|
Purchasing : |
Cash / Credit (15-30 days) |
GENERAL
INFORMATION
|
Customers : |
End Users and others Government Bodies, Hospitals, Schools etc. |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
29 |
|
|
|
|
Bankers : |
HDFC, Nashik Branch, Business Co-operative Bank, Nashik Branch |
|
|
|
|
Banking
Relations : |
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
Auditors : |
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Suresh Botra (Chartered Accountant) |
|
|
|
|
Associates/Subsidiaries : |
M/s Archana Address: 6/17, Howson Road, Opposite Bharat Cold Drink House, Deolali
Camp, Nashik 422401, Maharashtra, India Line of Business: Trading of Uniform Fabrics |
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
|
Capital Investment : |
|
|
Owned : |
Rs. 1.200 Millions |
|
Borrowed : |
0.000 |
|
Total : |
Rs. 1.200 Millions |
FINANCIAL DATA
[all figures are in Rupees Millions]
|
Particulars |
|
31.03.2007 |
31.03.2006 |
|
Sales Turnover |
|
4.000 |
2.000 |
Expected Sales (2008) : Rs.6.000 Millions
LOCAL AGENCY
FURTHER INFORMATION
Trade References:-
v
Taj Hotels
v
Seva Automotive Private Limited.(Nashik-Dhule-Nanded)
v
Wasan Bajaj (Nashik)
v
Wasan Automobiles Private Limited (Nashik)
v
Wasan Toyota (Nashik)
v
Bafna Motors Private Limited (Mumbai-Ratnagiri)
v
Ujwal Automotives Private Limited (Dhule- Jalgaoan)
v
Panchavati Hyundai(Nashik)
v
Shivang Automobiles Hero Honda (Nashik)
v
Rushabh Honda (Nashik)
v
Ashoka Buildcon Private Limited
(Nashik)
v
Ashoka Arch Private Limited (Pune)
v
Kammander Security Services (Nashik-Pune-Goa)
v
Brains Innovations Electronic Security System (Nashik)
v
United Security Services (Nashik-Dhule-Jalgaon-Mumbai-Chandwad)
v
Dirk India Private Limited (Nashik)
v
Tecknokrat’s Control System (India) Private Limited (Nashik)
v
Meena Elastomers (Sinnar)
v
Caprihans India Private Limited (Nashik)
v
Barnes School (Deolali)
v
St.Philominas School (Nasik Road)
v
Emerald Heights Public School (Nasik Road)
v
St. Peters Convent High School (Adgaon)
v
Panchavati Group Of Hotels
v
Hotel Chaan (Nashik)
v
Hotel Pooja International (Nashik)
v
Rasoi Family Restaurant (Nasik Road)
CMT REPORT
(Corruption, Money Laundering & Terrorism]
The Public Notice information has been collected from various sources
including but not limited to: The Courts, India Prisons Service,
Interpol, etc.
1] INFORMATION ON
DESIGNATED PARTY
No exist designating subject or any of its beneficial owners,
controlling shareholders or senior officers as terrorist or terrorist
organization or whom notice had been received that all financial transactions
involving their assets have been blocked or convicted, found guilty or against
whom a judgement or order had been entered in a proceedings for violating
money-laundering, anti-corruption or bribery or international economic or
anti-terrorism sanction laws or whose assets were seized, blocked, frozen or
ordered forfeited for violation of money laundering or international
anti-terrorism laws.
2] Court Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that subject is
or was the subject of any formal or informal allegations, prosecutions or other
official proceeding for making any prohibited payments or other improper
payments to government officials for engaging in prohibited transactions or
with designated parties.
3] Asset Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that the property or assets of the subject
are derived from criminal conduct or a prohibited transaction.
4] Record on Financial
Crime :
Charges or conviction
registered against subject: None
5] Records on Violation of
Anti-Corruption Laws :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
6] Records on Int’l
Anti-Money Laundering Laws/Standards :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
7] Criminal Records
No
available information exist that suggest that subject or any of its principals
have been formally charged or convicted by a competent governmental authority
for any financial crime or under any formal investigation by a competent
government authority for any violation of anti-corruption laws or international
anti-money laundering laws or standard.
8] Affiliation with
Government :
No record
exists to suggest that any director or indirect owners, controlling
shareholders, director, officer or employee of the company is a government
official or a family member or close business associate of a Government
official.
9] Compensation Package :
Our market
survey revealed that the amount of compensation sought by the subject is fair
and reasonable and comparable to compensation paid to others for similar
services.
10] Press Report :
No press reports / filings exists on
the subject.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
MIRA INFORM as part of its Due Diligence do provide comments on
Corporate Governance to identify management and governance. These factors often
have been predictive and in some cases have created vulnerabilities to credit
deterioration.
Our Governance Assessment focuses principally on the interactions
between a company’s management, its Board of Directors, Shareholders and other
financial stakeholders.
CONTRAVENTION
Subject is not known to have contravened any existing local laws,
regulations or policies that prohibit, restrict or otherwise affect the terms
and conditions that could be included in the agreement with the subject.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.39.97 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.79.53 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.63.09 |
SCORE & RATING
EXPLANATIONS
|
SCORE FACTORS |
RANGE |
POINTS |
|
HISTORY |
1~10 |
3 |
|
PAID-UP CAPITAL |
1~10 |
3 |
|
OPERATING SCALE |
1~10 |
3 |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION |
|
|
|
--BUSINESS SCALE |
1~10 |
4 |
|
--PROFITABILIRY |
1~10 |
2 |
|
--LIQUIDITY |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--LEVERAGE |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--RESERVES |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--CREDIT LINES |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--MARGINS |
-5~5 |
-- |
|
DEMERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--BANK CHARGES |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--LITIGATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--OTHER ADVERSE INFORMATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
MERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--SOLE DISTRIBUTORSHIP |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--EXPORT ACTIVITIES |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--AFFILIATION |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--LISTED |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--OTHER MERIT FACTORS |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
TOTAL |
|
27 |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report.
The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors carry similar weight in credit
consideration. Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems
comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
NR |
In view of the lack of information, we have no basis upon which to
recommend credit dealings |
No Rating |
|