![]()
|
Report Date : |
22.08.2008 |
IDENTIFICATION
DETAILS
|
Name : |
WALT DISNEY COMPANY (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
4th Floor, Peninsula Towers - I, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg,
Lower Parel, Mumbai -400013, Maharashtra |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
India |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.03.2007 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
01.08.2003 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
11-149854 |
|
|
|
|
CIN No.: [Company
Identification No.] |
U74999MH2003FTC149854 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Liability Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
They are into broadcasting. |
RATING &
COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Maximum Credit Limit : |
USD 194225 |
|
|
|
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Regular |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
|
|
|
|
Comments : |
Subject is a part of Walt Disney U. S. A. The Company has incurred
initial losses in India mainly due to marketing efforts. Walt Disney has
nearly 32 % shares in UTV, a listed company. Trade relations are fair. Payments are usually correct and as per
commitment. The company can be considered good for any normal business
dealings. It can be regarded as a promising business partner in a medium to
long-run. |
INFORMATION PARTED
BY
|
Name : |
Mr. Jino |
|
Designation : |
Account Department |
|
Date : |
29.07.2008 |
LOCATIONS
|
Registered Office : |
4th Floor, Peninsula Towers - I, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg,
Lower Parel, Mumbai -400013, Maharashtra, India |
|
Tel. No.: |
91-22-66516600 / 66 / 67 / 56516615 |
|
Fax No.: |
91-22-56516744 / 66516667 |
|
E-Mail : |
|
|
Area : |
20000 sq. ft. [Rented] |
DIRECTORS
|
Name : |
Mr. Sunil Shahani |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
Address : |
A18/3 Naitrv Park Soc. Sion Trombay Road, Chembur Mumbai – 400071,
Maharashtra, India |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
20.05.1963 |
|
Date of Appointment : |
09.12.2005 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. David Keith Thompson |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
Address : |
754 South Oakland Avn. Pasadena – 91106, California |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
19.11.1949 |
|
Date of Appointment : |
19.08.2004 |
|
Date of Ceasing : |
27.08.2007 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. P. R. Sodarshan |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
Address : |
20 Milind Apartments, Sane Guruji Nagar, Mulund East, Mumbai,
Maharashtra, India |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
19.04.1970 |
|
Date of Appointment : |
28.07.2005 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Bahram Vakil |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
Address : |
Neptune Court, Floor 106 Napean Sea Road, Mumbai – 400006,
Maharashtra, India |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
12.09.1955 |
|
Date of Appointment : |
09.12.2005 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Raman Sharma |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
Address : |
C 177, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi – 110044, India |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
03.11.1959 |
|
Date of Appointment : |
01.08.2003 |
|
Date of Ceasing : |
19.12.2005 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Hardeep Sachdeva |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
Address : |
F40 South Ex. Part I, New Delhi – 110049, India |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
25.10.1971 |
|
Date of Appointment : |
25.10.2004 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Douglas Miller |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
Address : |
House No. 12, 63 Deepwater Bay Road, Hongkong 122002 |
|
Date of Appointment : |
19.08.2004 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Dr. Akhil Prasad |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
Address : |
301, Rocky Hill, Shirley Rajan Road, Bandra West, Mumbai, Maharashtra,
India |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
21.01.1969 |
|
Date of Appointment : |
09.12.2005 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Rajat Kumar Jain |
|
Designation : |
Managing Director |
|
Address : |
B 14, Sangam Juhu, Varsova Link Road, Andheri West, Mumbai – 400053,
Maharashtra, India |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
13.09.1963 |
|
Date of Appointment : |
19.03.2004 |
|
Date of Ceasing : |
27.08.2007 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Reed Sharma |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
Address : |
4301 E 1, Prieto Drive, Altadena, California |
|
Date of Appointment : |
19.08.2004 |
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
/ SHAREHOLDING PATTERN
AS ON 19.12.2005
|
Names of Shareholders |
No. of
Equity Shares |
No. of
Preference Shares |
|
Raman Sharma |
5000 |
-- |
|
Hardeep Sachdeva |
5000 |
-- |
|
Disney Enterprises |
2500000 |
50672132 |
|
Total |
2510000 |
50672132 |
AS ON 30.09.2006
|
Equity Share
Breakup |
|
Percentage of
Holding |
|
Category |
|
|
|
Foreign holdings [Foreign institutional investors, Foreign Companies, Foreign Financial Institutions, Non-resident Indian or Overseas corporate bodies or others] |
|
100.00 |
AS ON 28.06.2007
|
Names of Allottee |
|
Number of fully convertible
Preference Shares allotted |
|
Disney Enterprises Inc. |
|
4782060 |
BUSINESS DETAILS
|
Line of Business : |
They are into broadcasting. |
GENERAL
INFORMATION
|
No. of Employees : |
100 |
|
|
|
|
Bankers : |
Bank of America, Nariman Point |
|
|
|
|
Banking
Relations : |
-- |
|
|
|
|
Auditors : |
|
|
Name : |
Price Waterhouse and Company Chartered Accountants |
|
Address : |
252, Price Waterhouse and Company, Next to Mayor’s Bungalow, Shivaji Park,
Mumbai – 400028, Maharashtra, India |
|
|
|
|
Associates/Subsidiaries : |
Disney Enterprises Inc. USA |
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
AS ON 30.06.2007
Authorised Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
23000000 |
Equity Shares |
Rs. 10/- each |
Rs. 230.000 Millions |
|
67000000 |
Preference Shares |
Rs. 10/- each |
Rs. 670.000 Millions |
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. 900.000
Millions |
Issued, Subscribed & Paid-up Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
2510000 |
Equity Shares |
Rs. 10/- each |
Rs. 25.100
Millions |
|
50672132 |
Preference Shares |
Rs. 10/- each |
Rs. 506.721
Millions |
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. 531.821 Millions |
FINANCIAL DATA
[all figures are in Rupees Millions]
ABRIDGED BALANCE
SHEET
|
SOURCES OF FUNDS |
|
31.03.2007 |
31.03.2006 |
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
1] Share Capital |
|
531.821 |
531.821 |
|
|
2] Share Application Money |
|
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
3] Reserves & Surplus |
|
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
4] (Accumulated Losses) |
|
[492.976] |
[374.335] |
|
|
NETWORTH |
|
38.845 |
157.486 |
|
|
LOAN FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
1] Secured Loans |
|
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
2] Unsecured Loans |
|
201.351 |
197.081 |
|
|
TOTAL BORROWING |
|
201.351 |
197.081 |
|
|
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES |
|
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
240.196 |
354.567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPLICATION OF FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS [Net Block] |
|
36.304 |
43.436 |
|
|
Capital work-in-progress |
|
0.000 |
1.205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT |
|
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
DEFERREX TAX ASSETS |
|
0.000 |
50.611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS, LOANS & ADVANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
0.000
|
0.000 |
|
|
Sundry Debtors |
|
256.474
|
204.819 |
|
|
Cash & Bank Balances |
|
91.410
|
96.259 |
|
|
Other Current Assets |
|
0.000
|
0.000 |
|
|
Loans & Advances |
|
67.817
|
86.383 |
|
Total
Current Assets |
|
415.701
|
387.461 |
|
|
Less : CURRENT
LIABILITIES & PROVISIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
198.226
|
120.397 |
|
|
Provisions |
|
13.583
|
7.749 |
|
Total
Current Liabilities |
|
211.809
|
128.146 |
|
|
Net Current Assets |
|
203.892
|
259.315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES |
|
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
240.196 |
354.567 |
|
PROFIT & LOSS
ACCOUNT
|
PARTICULARS |
|
31.03.2007 |
31.03.2006 |
|
|
Total Income |
|
886.179 |
527.903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/(Loss) Before Tax |
|
[58.529] |
[155.138] |
|
|
Provision for Taxation |
|
-- |
-- |
|
|
Profit/(Loss) After Tax |
|
[58.529] |
[155.138] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
11.808 |
9.259 |
|
|
Depreciation & Amortization |
|
20.184 |
18.897 |
|
|
Other Expenditure |
|
912.716 |
654.885 |
|
Total Expenditure |
|
944.708 |
683.041 |
|
KEY RATIOS
|
PARTICULARS |
|
|
31.03.2007 |
31.03.2006 |
|
PAT / Total Income |
(%) |
|
[6.60]
|
[29.39] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit Margin (PBT/Sales) |
(%) |
|
[6.60]
|
[29.39] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Total Assets (PBT/Total Assets} |
(%) |
|
[12.95]
|
[36.00] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Investment (ROI) (PBT/Networth) |
|
|
[1.51]
|
[0.99] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Equity Ratio (Total Liability/Networth) |
|
|
10.64
|
2.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Ratio (Current Asset/Current Liability) |
|
|
1.96
|
3.02 |
LOCAL AGENCY
FURTHER INFORMATION
The Registered Office of the company has been
shifted from F-40, N.D.S.E. part I, New Delhi – 110049 to the present address
w.e.f. September 24, 2004
WEB DETAILS
NEWS
Indiantelevision.com's
interview with The Walt Disney Company (India) Private Limited managing
director Rajat Jain
It's been eight months since The
Walt Disney Company set up shop in India and unleashed the magical world of the
much adored Mickey and his gang of toons to kids here.
The aim was to clearly make
'Disney' the leading entertainment brand in India in the next five - 10 years.
The key objective of the company was outlined as "market development"
by spearheading market entry via television. Enter Disney Channel and the Toon
Disney channel in December 2004. Other areas that were identified were -
retail, films, mobile and internet and separate divisions were set up for the
same.
But clearly the lynchpin of
Disney in India is its television business and the next couple of years will
see the company gearing up to establish itself as the new benchmark for kids
marketing and kid-appropriate family entertainment.
In his first full-fledge
interview to the media since taking the helm as managing director of The Walt
Disney Company (India) Private Limited, Rajat Jain speaks to Indiantelevision.com's
Hetal Adesara about the company's plans in India, his
mandate and more...
Excerpts:
Walt Disney picks up
15 percent in UTV's broadcast arm
8 Aug, 2008, 1734
hrs IST, IANS
MUMBAI: Walt Disney Co has picked up 15 percent stake in UTV Global Broadcasting Limited (UGBL) for Rs.1.18 billion, UTV announced in a statement Friday. UGBL has allocated 300,000 equity shares to The Walt Disney (South-East Asia) Pte Limited.
With the completion of the largest foreign investment in the media and
entertainment sector in India, Disney now has 32.1 percent stake in UTV
Software Communications and 15 percent in the broadcast arm of the company,
UGBL, on a total investment of Rs.81.83 billion, the statement said.
At the same time, UTV Software was allocated 1.5 million UGBL equity shares at
Rs.10 each, constituting 75 percent of the paid-up capital of the company, for
Rs.2.40 billion. This arrangement made UGBL a subsidiary of UTV.
The remaining 10 percent stake in UGBL will be held by UTV chief Ronnie
Screwvala's Promoter Group, the statement said. UGBL is the parent company of
Genx Entertainment Limited and UTV Entertainment Television Limited. The two
companies together launched four new television channels in the past six months
- Bindaas, Bindaas Movies, World Movies and UTV Movies.
It's been eight months since the
two Disney channels launched in India. What does the report card say?
The report card is pretty good. Our television business is picking
up. The two channels have been through the initial phase of seeding and
building up, coupled with the fact that our distribution is expanding every
week. India is not an easy distribution market given the fact that there are so
many channels and cable space is limited. So it's obviously a market, which is
crowded and hence it's taking more time. But in terms of overall ratings or
GRPs or channel share, the channels are actually picking up.
Toon Disney is currently not in Hindi but it is still doing
pretty well. The channel is going all Hindi from 1 September. We are quite
happy with the overall performance of the channels both on the distribution
front (it is now available in close to 22 - 23 million homes) and in terms of
ratings too where we expected it to be in a span of six - eight months.
In terms of audiences, we are getting the kind of audiences
that we were looking at, that is, not just 4 - 14 years but kids and family.
One of the unique propositions of Disney is that it is not just a kid's brand.
It is kids and family inclusive. With our movie blocks we are able to get a
much wider appeal and audience. So the youth and parents' skews are quite
positive in that sense and it gives us the opportunity to expand the advertiser
base. The important point is that The Disney Channel is ahead of leading movie
channels in the evening among the core target group that we look at.
So to sum it all, this is what the report card says -- In
terms of ad sales we have 66+ brands on the channels. In terms of distribution,
we are available in over 22 million homes. In terms of ratings we are clearly
reaching there. In terms of brand and connect to the audience, research will
show that the existing brand equity of Disney as a brand is certainly getting
stronger with the launch of the channels in India.
The
hitch that the channels came across was in the area of distribution and hence
visibility was low in its early days here. To what extent has that problem been
solved? What are the measures that have been taken to ensure maximum
visibility?
Like I said earlier, the distribution growth today is not such
that you will get 100 per cent distribution in the first week itself. It takes
five-10 months for the same. There are cases when even after 10 years the
channels don't have even 80 per cent distribution and I'm talking about
leaders. So it is important to have a reasonable amount of distribution before
you start going out to mass market in terms of visibility.
Now to specifically answer your question, visibility means
what you're seeing and what is available. We have made our presence felt in the
outdoor mode more than anything else. As far as the basic platform of
television is concerned, we have had constant visibility on Star Plus (where we
have a one hour Disney block) and on our two channels. We have used a
reasonable amount of marketing dollar behind creating visibility at the
appropriate time as and when the distribution has been picking up and for the
appropriate properties that have a connect with the TG.
Disney
is looking at consolidating its TV channel business in India before
diversifying into other segments of media and entertainment. What is the time
line you have given yourself for the consolidation to take place?
Consolidation happens only after 10 years of being in a particular
market. We have just launched TV and clearly it is our focus and driver for our
business. There are other divisions too - Consumer Products and the Mobile and
Wireless business, where you can get Disney ring tones, wallpapers and games
from Indiagames. Add to that apparel, shoes, books publishing and so on.
Then we have our distributor in Columbia TriStar - Sony,
which distributes all our movies. So all the businesses are there but in the
overall context, television clearly is the biggest and it is also a driver.
With television you have your platform and once you have the platform, you can
use it to drive other lines of businesses. So given the fact that we are
eight-nine months old in India, we still have a long way to go.
Today 70 per cent of the entertainment market comprises
television in India. So it's not surprising that for us, television will be the
driver. And even in TV, we are currently just looking at The Disney Channel and
Toon Disney, which is really a small part of our portfolio that comprises a
significant number of big brands, businesses and opportunities that could exist
for the Walt Disney Company in India in the next 10 - 15 years.
One of the important aspects of my role is to try and see
which of these opportunities can be logically brought into India, but ones that
makes sense towards building the Disney brand and the Walt Disney Company into
making it a leader in the kids and family entertainment business.
Speaking
about the Disney Consumer Products division, you'll were planning to have
Disney Corners at select retail outlets throughout the country from which
licensed merchandise would be sold. Has that happened?
There is enough Disney presence in several stores in India. We
have 55 licensees/partners around the country, some of them being - Cadburys,
Archies, Shoppers Stop, Lifestyle etc. In the retail space, there are some
Disney Corners; some of them are Disney shop in shop. This was more active in
the pre-television period. The impact of the TV business on the consumer
products business is yet to be seen. All the investment that is being put on
the Disney brand in the last six months has been on the Disney Channel.
Now we are pushing Princess, which is one of the
biggest girl franchisee that Disney has and just recently the accessories
related to the property have sold out like hot cakes. The impact of the
television platform, advertising and channel support on consumer products is
now beginning to be felt.
In the Indian market, which is quite different from China or
US markets that have relatively more entrenched Disney brand in people's minds,
we are in a state where we are creating history and building a brand from the
ground up in a pristine way.
The impact of television is already beginning to show on our
other divisions. We will continue to focus on building TV, so that it becomes a
stronger and stronger platform to help publishing, shoes, apparel, toys,
telecom and wireless, mobile, broadband, films and what have you.
How
integral are movies for a kids' channel?
I think they are relatively less important. We have movies on the
weekends; typically we have one movie a day in the evening prime time. Our
bigger focus is on series, whether it is Kim Possible, That's So Raven,
Jo-Jo's Circus or Lizzie McGuire.
For us movies are important because it brings in the larger
family but the backbone of our channel is not movies.
They are a great property and spike as also great
destination drivers but I think on a continuous basis, movies are not habit
forming. That has to come from series. Yes, clearly movies help sometimes to
drive audiences to that habit.
Are
there any new properties that are lined up on either of the channels later this
year?
There are lots lined up on Toon Disney as well as Disney Channel
and that will be significantly pushed with new activities. Clearly the biggest
activity you will see on Toon Disney will be the conversion to Hindi. The
moment you go from English to Hindi suddenly the appeal of the channel goes
from five million to 25 million homes since 65-70 per cent of the country
understands Hindi than English. That's going to give Toon Disney a huge boost.
The Disney Channel in the season time is going to see movie
festivals, big events, couple of new show launches, some local original
programming, which we will be acquiring apart from beginning to make some of
that. You will see all of that over the next three to six months. The direction
that we are moving towards is to bring in more and more localization, whether
it is language dubbing or acquiring local products made in India or producing
live action shows here.
The purpose of localization is to bring in relevance,
connect and understanding in the local market and the target audience. Our priority
is clearly to make live action original programming. We are in talks with a lot
of production houses. However, I can't name any of them as yet.
Strategically, we are talking to people who we believe can
make Disney quality, are able to treasure the Disney values of fun,
story-telling and community.
So are
you saying that localisation is the way forward for kids' channels?
What I'm saying is that localisation is the key for everything.
It's not about localisation for kids' channels only. The Indian market and our
culture is very strongly independent and unique. We have our own identity and
our own set of languages. And hence you have to find the best mix of local
versus global. From Kellogg's to McDonalds everyone has gone down the path of
localisation some way or the other. You can't not take into account the local
sentiments.
Large global MNCs have accepted the fact that it is not the
overall "one size fits all" strategy anymore but you have to make
different products for different markets.
Since
the main revenue source for the kids' genre will remain advertising, have there
been any studies done on how fast the market is expanding? How big is the
overall kids' advertising pie of television today and what growth rates are we
looking at?
I don't think I have seen any formal study. This is simple maths.
The total advertising market may be growing by 10 per cent or so. The entire
industry is growing by 18 per cent (including subscription revenues, which are
growing much faster). If you take only the advertising revenues of the entire
industry, kids' genre is definitely growing much faster simply because in the
last one year, many new channels that have come up and I don't think anyone is
going down.
This market is essentially in a positive phase of growth.
Only about 10 per cent of kids used to watch kids' channels when there was
little choice in the market. But now that you have more quality choices and
options, kids' viewing of kids channels has increased. It has gone up from 10
per cent in December last year to 17 per cent at present and that's a
significant jump.
Till last year beginning it was only Cartoon Network and
then the rest came in slowly - Pogo, Nick, Animax, Hungama and the two Disney
channels. As a result, the whole basket of kids viewing has grown.
All these channels are investing money in the brand. Hungama
TV has made a lot of investments and because of the competition hotting up,
Cartoon Network and Pogo have also made substantial marketing investments. So a
lot of hoardings are now on kids channels, which was not the case last year.
It's quite natural that when you start investing in the
category, the category grows because there is more visibility, action, schemes
and more programming alternatives. That gives it a fillip for it to grow
faster. According to me this market is definitely growing at 25 - 30 per cent.
It's a good time for kids' business at large.
I don't have research on the kids advertising market but
when you add the ad sales of all the kids' channels, the total is still not Rs
1 billion, it is far smaller. The total size of the pie is roughly Rs 45
billion. There is a lot of scope to increase the kids' pie to touch a figure of
at least Rs 2 billion. It may mean a 100 per cent growth for kids' channels but
it is still a small share of the total ad pie. So given the fact that it is
small, it has a huge potential provided you give the right product, marketing
and you are able to get parental trust and advocacy, which is what Disney's
cornerstone is.
What's happening these days is that kids are getting older
younger and hence the research that is available is on kids' behaviour as
opposed to kids' advertising. Kids have more and more influence on the purchase
decision making power over parents today, which is where advertising come in.
As a result of which, insurance companies, automobiles, financial services,
mobile handsets, telecom… virtually every segment is advertising on kids'
channels. It's not just ketchups, jams and candy brands anymore. As a result of
this, the Rs 1 billion figure is also going to grow as more categories are
willing to advertise on kids' channels.
With more channels coming in, there will be more inventory,
options and competition for advertisers. The net result of this will be that the
kids' market will grow. Somewhat similar to what happened in the telecom sector
and the news channels genre. The latter has grown by 300 per cent, but we
aren't even talking of that - we're looking at a 50 - 60 per cent growth.
What
is the advertisers' profile like on the two Disney channels?
We have traditional as well as non-traditional advertisers on both
our channels. Some of the brands that advertise with us are Maggie Noodles,
Dabur Real Juice, Parle G, Britannia, Pepsodent, Cadbury, Rasna Juc Up, Clinic
All Clear, Harvest Gold, Amity Business School, Prakash Snacks, Archies and Doy
Soaps to name a few.
When we launched, eight brands advertised with us, now we
have 66.
With UTV
slated to launch another two kids channels soon, do you think there is space
for more in a market like India?
Well, it's good that there are more kids' channels coming up. In
UK, there are more than 20 kids' channels. I think in India, we can sustain 10
such channels but it's a matter of getting the right product and the right
business models. For channels to sustain, one of the things that have to change
for us over time is that the broadcasters start getting the appropriate share
of subscription revenues, which we don't get.
For niche channels to sustain, they will have to pitch
themselves on a specific segment. When that happens, ad sales revenues will
over time become less important because it will become more difficult to get that
pie. But what you should get is that 'x' per cent of the total subscription
revenue that is generated, which today you don't get because you don't know
who's watching your channel and how many are watching. There is this constant
debate around viewership versus declaration versus under declaration etc… I
think addressability has to happen with new platforms and appropriate
addressability coming in the next three-five years.
If you provide the right content, it is possible to get the
right share of revenue of that segment of the population as opposed to just
advertisers. The total of that revenue is about $1 billion and the broadcasters
get about 10 - 15 per cent of that. Whereas, the global average is about 50 per
cent or maybe more.
DTH is going to come up in a big way and that platform is
fully addressable. So once that happens, there will be pressure on the cable
systems to either improve and become addressable or lose to DTH. Then IP
Broadband TV is waiting to enter at some stage when the technology is well
figured and one can reach the last mile. That too is fully addressable. Like,
in kids' channels, more channels will improve the overall quality, similarly in
the distribution market, more choice of reaching your favourite programming,
you have to improve the quality.
Is
Disney planning to launch the Playhouse Disney channel in India?
Playhouse Disney is a great brand and is currently seen as a block
on the Disney Channel and is one of the highest rating blocks on the channel.
Why does it have to be a channel? It is doing very well as a
block. Around the world in many countries it exists as a separate channel but
in the US it airs as a block on the Disney Channel. It's a matter of saying how
viable is the business in the market. If Playhouse Disney channel is launched
in India, it would be targeted at pre-school kids and mothers between the ages
of 25 - 34. That's a small segment and they will be willing to pay more because
they are getting quality product. But by them willing to pay more, broadcasters
don't get any incremental share of that revenue.
We have just two channels as of now but there are several
other channels in the Disney portfolio that can come into India. They are
unique channels and hence the business plan and the viability depends a lot on
the addressability of the system.
Playhouse Disney surely has the opportunity to become a
channel at some stage but at the right time when the market is ready and we are
convinced that we can make a business out of it.
Cartoon
Network is a clear leader in the kids' space. How long do you think it will
take Disney to inch closer to it?
If you talk about inching closer, we are inching closer to them
every day because we are growing. I don't know how long it will take us to
cross them.
Our clear mission is to make Disney a clear leading
entertainment brand in India. And Cartoon Network remember is primarily
television business. We are in multiple businesses and for us our big
businesses are studio entertainment, parks and resorts, consumer products and
media. Media networks has radio, television, Internet etc. The television
business contributes to around 25 per cent of the company's total revenues. We
don't really say that Cartoon Network is our only competition. There is a large
spectrum of players out there in the market.
Our mission is not to beat Cartoon Network. We are the
world's fifth largest brand and the biggest kids and family entertainment
company in the world. Whether it takes us three, five or 10 years to reach the
top only time will tell because a lot depends on how the market changes and
regulations move.
Our business here is very integrated and we are driving the
Disney brand with various businesses under it - television, consumer products,
Internet, publishing, digital media, broadband and theme parks and resorts
(which is far away).
Essentially with this whole mix, we should be leaders in the
kids business. Cartoon Network has a 10 year lead advantage over us. They are
hugely distributed and have had a monopolistic presence so I'm sure they have
the numbers. We are quite satisfied with the way we are seeing our growth
curve. And this is not yet having hit the season and also the Hindi language.
It's not so easy to displace leaders and to be fair it is going to take a few
years to reach there. We will make our efforts and it's not only about being
number one in terms of the ratings but you should be number one in the hearts
and minds of children and parents.
For the Walt Disney Company, India is clearly a focus market
and is the cornerstone for our international expansion.
With
the latest addition of Tushar Shah as director marketing, that about completes
the A-List team at Disney India. Is that correct?
By and large yes. Nachiket Pantvaidya (programming), Sunil Shahani
(finance), Tushar Shah (marketing), Sanjay Reddy (ad sales), Shantanu Nalavadi
(business development), Amit Malhotra (BVITV), Amitabh Srivastava
(distribution) and Subhasis Mishra (HR) complete the television side of the
business, which is very much in place now. Of course I have the other divisions
of the business, which are headed by the respective heads.
Why do
you think kids' channels are resorting to star power to lure its audiences? Any
plans of roping in actors for endorsements in the near future?
I think we will do anything that is relevant and in line with the
Disney brand principles. We have some fairly stringent ways of looking at
things. Having said that, there is no reason you cannot have a brand
ambassador. We have multiple levels of the brand and hence the architecture is
not straight forward so whether there is a role for a brand ambassador in our
company, is yet to be seen.
For us to say that someone is a Disney brand ambassador is a
big thing. He has to embody all our principles and it's not easy. To be honest
our biggest brand ambassador is Mickey Mouse.
What
is the Walt Disney Television International (India)'s agenda going to be for
the next six months or so? Will there be a focus on something particular?
In the coming six months our agenda is to clearly ensure that our
creative processes are vibrant and that our programming meets the Indian
consumer's tastes and preferences.
The second priority is empowerment of kids' viewers that
interact with us. That is really important to us and is a part of our brand
architecture.
Finally, it will be to focus on some of the new aspects of
our business, which is the growth of the consumer products and newer digital
technology driven business - Internet, wireless etc. That is a very dynamic
market is ever changing and clearly there will be opportunities in that space
for us in the next six - twelve months.
We will be getting the team and expertise in place so that
we have a reasonable play in the lines of business which are likely to be
driven by television. Our agenda will be to make sure that the rest of the
system is geared to respond to the positive swing that the television business
can create for the rest of the business. That's a priority for us.
Till now television has been the focus for us but the other
non-TV businesses are also important.
So
have theme parks taken a back seat? When Eisner and Iger had come to India
earlier this year, there was much speculation then around the same.
Theme parks weren't on our agenda at all. There were a lot of
talks and they will continue. Our priority is television not to say that things
are impossible. We will continue to evaluate opportunities. Our current focus
is Hong Kong Disney Land, which is due to open in two weeks' time. So all eyes
will be there and it will be the closest Disney Land to India. And India will
be in the catchments area of the Hong Kong Disney Land's marketing.
As far as India is concerned, it is too distant for us to
even think of a Disney Land at this stage. We want to focus on the immediate
business objectives in the next couple of years.
WALT DISNEY COMPANY (INDIA)
![]()
Welcome back, Mickey
Vanita Kohli-Khandekar
This is one aggressive mouse.
Ten years after it goofed up in India, the $28-billion Walt Disney Co., one of
the largest media companies in the world, launched two TV channels, Disney
Channel and Toon Disney last week. And it seems determined to make Disney work
in India. Will it? Yes, for three reasons. One, this time Disney is on its own.
It came to India in 1993 in a venture with the Modis. For 10 years it watched
as global rivals like Newscorp (Star), Viacom (MTV) and Turner (Cartoon
Network) raced ahead. As soon as the venture got over, Disney set to work
putting together its India plan.
Two, this time Disney is banking
on the dynamic TV business to drive its growth. Earlier a large part its
strategy relied on licensed merchandising, a no-go in a market full of
counterfeits.
Three, and this is very
important. Disney is localising like never before. So each of the two channels
come with Tamil, Telugu, Hindi and English audio feeds, says Rajat Jain,
managing director (India). About 1,650 episodes of dubbed programming plus
about 400 episodes of locally produced programming, including films on Indian
folktales, makes it one of the largest localisation efforts by Disney. Almost
every foreign broadcaster who has done well in India has done so on the back of
local content.
BW spoke to David
Hulbert (H), president, Walt Disney
International; Douglas K. Miller (M), managing director for its Asia-Pacific
business; and Rajat Jain (J), managing director (India). Excerpts.
On what
went wrong with the Modis
H: In 1993, the times were different. We could have achieved a lot, but did
not. We are believers in getting the timing right. For example, we launched our
first channels in Scandinavia and Japan last year. These are markets you would
have thought we would be in, but pay TV infrastructure in Japan, for example,
is complicated. It's show business, but you must get the 'business' part of it
right.
On the
Star deal
H: It's platform neutral. We'd like to be as widely available as possible.
On what
will drive growth in India and China
M: We are opening the Disney Theme Park in China in September 2005; we expect
it to be a big growth driver. Also, consumer products drive growth in China. It
is a closed market for media and we don't have landing rights. But we are the number
one provider of films to CCTV, we syndicate our content to 40 stations. So in
China it is a combination of syndicated business and consumer products. In
India TV will drive growth.
On
being late in India
BW spoke to David Hulbert (H), president, Walt Disney International;
Douglas K. Miller (M), managing director for its Asia-Pacific business; and
Rajat Jain (J), managing director (India). Excerpts.
On the
potential in India
J: Less than 10 per cent of the kids in urban Indian cable homes
watch kid's programmes. So it is an underserved market. And Indian cultural
ethos of family-oriented entertainment sits well with Disney's. India is the
first place in the Asia-Pacific where Toon Disney is being launched.
On
whether the India launch is on Disney's global radar
H: The day before yesterday, Michael
Eisner was in London for the opening of Mary Poppins, and he specifically
talked about Asia, India and China.
CMT REPORT
(Corruption, Money Laundering & Terrorism]
The Public Notice information has been collected from various sources
including but not limited to: The Courts, India Prisons Service,
Interpol, etc.
1] INFORMATION ON
DESIGNATED PARTY
No records exist designating subject or any of its beneficial owners, controlling
shareholders or senior officers as terrorist or terrorist organization or whom
notice had been received that all financial transactions involving their assets
have been blocked or convicted, found guilty or against whom a judgement or
order had been entered in a proceedings for violating money-laundering,
anti-corruption or bribery or international economic or anti-terrorism sanction
laws or whose assets were seized, blocked, frozen or ordered forfeited for
violation of money laundering or international anti-terrorism laws.
2] Court Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that subject is
or was the subject of any formal or informal allegations, prosecutions or other
official proceeding for making any prohibited payments or other improper payments
to government officials for engaging in prohibited transactions or with
designated parties.
3] Asset Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that the property or assets of the subject
are derived from criminal conduct or a prohibited transaction.
4] Record on Financial
Crime :
Charges or conviction
registered against subject: None
5] Records on Violation of
Anti-Corruption Laws :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
6] Records on Int’l
Anti-Money Laundering Laws/Standards :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
7] Criminal Records
No
available information exist that suggest that subject or any of its principals
have been formally charged or convicted by a competent governmental authority
for any financial crime or under any formal investigation by a competent
government authority for any violation of anti-corruption laws or international
anti-money laundering laws or standard.
8] Affiliation with
Government :
No record
exists to suggest that any director or indirect owners, controlling
shareholders, director, officer or employee of the company is a government
official or a family member or close business associate of a Government
official.
9] Compensation Package :
Our market
survey revealed that the amount of compensation sought by the subject is fair
and reasonable and comparable to compensation paid to others for similar
services.
10] Press Report :
No press reports / filings exists on
the subject.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
MIRA INFORM as part of its Due Diligence do provide comments on
Corporate Governance to identify management and governance. These factors often
have been predictive and in some cases have created vulnerabilities to credit
deterioration.
Our Governance Assessment focuses principally on the interactions
between a company’s management, its Board of Directors, Shareholders and other
financial stakeholders.
CONTRAVENTION
Subject is not known to have contravened any existing local laws,
regulations or policies that prohibit, restrict or otherwise affect the terms
and conditions that could be included in the agreement with the subject.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.43.58 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.81.43 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.64.52 |
SCORE & RATING
EXPLANATIONS
|
SCORE FACTORS |
RANGE |
POINTS |
|
HISTORY |
1~10 |
7 |
|
PAID-UP CAPITAL |
1~10 |
7 |
|
OPERATING SCALE |
1~10 |
6 |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION |
|
|
|
--BUSINESS SCALE |
1~10 |
5 |
|
--PROFITABILIRY |
1~10 |
- |
|
--LIQUIDITY |
1~10 |
6 |
|
--LEVERAGE |
1~10 |
7 |
|
--RESERVES |
1~10 |
- |
|
--CREDIT LINES |
1~10 |
7 |
|
--MARGINS |
-5~5 |
- |
|
DEMERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--BANK CHARGES |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--LITIGATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--OTHER ADVERSE INFORMATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
MERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--SOLE DISTRIBUTORSHIP |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--EXPORT ACTIVITIES |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--AFFILIATION |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--LISTED |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--OTHER MERIT FACTORS |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
TOTAL |
|
45 |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
RATING
EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit transaction.
It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest and
principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors carry similar weight in credit consideration.
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively below
average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
NR |
In view of the lack of information, we have no basis upon which to
recommend credit dealings |
No Rating |
|