![]()
|
Report Date : |
11.02.2008 |
IDENTIFICATION
DETAILS
|
Name : |
E I D PARRY (INDIA) LIMITED |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
Dare House, 234, NSC Bose Road, Parry’s Corner, Chennai-600 001,
Tamilnadu |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
India |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.03.2007 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
22.09.1975 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
18-6989 |
|
|
|
|
CIN No.: [Company
Identification No.] |
L24211TN1975PLC006989 |
|
|
|
|
TAN No.: [Tax
Deduction & Collection Account No.] |
VPNE00002C / MUME02262B / CHEE00001B / CHEE03226G |
|
|
|
|
PAN No.: [Permanent
Account No.] |
AAACE0702C |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
A Public Limited Liability Company. The Company’s shares are listed on
the Stock Exchanges. |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Manufacturing of Sugar, Sprit, Sanitary ware, Tiles, Ammonium
Phosphate Sulphate, Super Phosphate, PPC Products such as liquids, mixed and
straight fertilizer, soft fertilizer, soft ferrites, audio magnetic tapes,
audio compact cassettes and Acetic Acid. |
RATING &
COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Aa |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit transaction.
It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest and
principal sums |
Large |
|
Maximum Credit Limit : |
USD 21467000 |
|
|
|
|
Status : |
Excellent |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Regular |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
|
|
|
|
Comments : |
Subject is a part of Murugappa Group, a well-established and reputed industrial house. Available information indicates high financial responsibility of the company. Financial position of the company is good. Payments are usually correct and as per commitments. Fundamentals of the company are strong and healthy. The company can be considered good for normal business
dealings at usual trade terms and conditions. |
LOCATIONS
|
Registered Office : |
Dare House, 234, NSC Bose Road, Parry’s Corner, Chennai – 600 001, Tamil Nadu, INDIA |
|
Tel. No.: |
91-44-25340251 / 25340257 / 1101/25306789 |
|
Fax No.: |
91-44-25340858 / 25340723 / 25341609 |
|
E-Mail : |
|
|
Website : |
|
|
|
|
|
Factory 1 : |
Sugar Sugar Factory
& Distillery, Nellikuppam- 607 105, South Arcot District. Tamil Nadu Sugar Factory,
Petthavaithalai, Tiruchirapalli District Pin 639 112 Tamil Nadu Sugar Factory,
Pugalur-639 113, Tiruchirapalli District Tamil Nadu Sugar Factory,
Kurumbur-614622 Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai District. Tamil Nadu Sanitaryware Ceramics Factory
Plot No.223 to 226 Matsya Industrial Area Alwar-301 030, Rajasthan Ceramics Factory
Dewas Industrial Estate, Industrial Area No.2 A B Road, Dewas
455 001 (M.P.) Ceramics Factory,
Ranipet - 632 401, North Arcot District. Tamil Nadu Bio Products Thyagavalli Village, Via Alapakkam Rly. Station, Cuddalore Taluk - 608 803, South Arcot District. Tamil Nadu |
|
|
|
|
Factory 2 : |
Product Unit Fertilisers Ennore & Ranipet Pesticides Ranipet & Thane Seeds Kompally & Tiruchi Sugar Nellikuppam, Pudukottai & Pugalur Co-generation Plant Nellikuppam Tissue Calture Nellikuppam & Pugalur Acetic Acid Thyagavalli Sanitarywars & Allied Products Ranipet & Alwar Wall Tiles Karaikal |
|
|
|
|
Branches : |
Delhi, Kolkata, Ahmedabad, Akola, Thane, Bellary, Hyderabad, Kurnool, Bangalore, Trichy, Cuddalore, Kottayam, Vizag, Bhubaneswar, Vijayawada, Bhopal, Alwar, etc. |
DIRECTORS
|
Name : |
Mr. A Vellayan |
|
Designation : |
Chairman |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. P Rama Babu |
|
Designation : |
Managing Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Anand Narain Bhatia |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. S B Mathur |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. R A Savoor |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. M M Venkatachalam |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. S Viswanathan |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Management Team: |
|
|
Name : |
Mr. K Raghunandan |
|
Designation : |
President (Sugar) |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. K Ravindran |
|
Designation : |
Senior Vice President – Operations (sugar) |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Sebastian K Thomas |
|
Designation : |
Chief Executive (Nutraceuticals) |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. D Kumaraswamy |
|
Designation : |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. G Jalaja |
|
Designation : |
Vice President and Company Secretary. |
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
/ SHAREHOLDING PATTERN
As on 31.12.2007
|
Category |
No. of Shares |
Percentage of
Holding |
|
1) Indian |
|
|
|
Individuals/HUF |
4463830 |
5.00 |
|
Bodies Corporate |
32888623 |
36.85 |
|
Any other |
47715 |
0.05 |
|
Total |
37400168 |
41.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
2) Foreign |
|
|
|
Total Shareholding of promoter and promoter group |
37400168 |
41.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
B) Public
Shareholding |
|
|
|
1) Institutions |
|
|
|
Mutual Funds/ UTI |
4294849 |
4.81 |
|
Financial Institutions / Banks |
314744 |
0.35 |
|
Insurance Companies |
11429757 |
12.81 |
|
Foreign Institutional Investors |
13788542 |
15.45 |
|
Total |
29827892 |
33.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
2) Non
Institutions |
|
|
|
Bodies Corporate |
2356565 |
2.64 |
|
Individuals |
|
|
|
Individual shareholders holding nominal sharecapital upto Rs.0.100
Millions |
11738119 |
13.15 |
|
Individual shareholders holding nominal sharecapital in excess of Rs. 0.100
Millions |
4364999 |
4.89 |
|
Any other (Non resident Indians) |
453761 |
0.51 |
|
Overseas corporate bodies |
539380 |
0.60 |
|
Trust |
51995 |
0.06 |
|
Foreign Nationals |
138150 |
0.15 |
|
Clearing Members |
31521 |
0.04 |
|
Total |
19674490 |
22.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total public
shareholding B= B(1) + B(2) |
495023825 |
55.47 |
|
Total (A+B) |
86902550 |
97.37 |
|
Shares held by
custodians and against which depository receipts have been issued |
2345965 |
2.63 |
|
Grand Total |
89248515 |
100.00 |
BUSINESS DETAILS
|
Line of Business : |
Manufacturing of Sugar, Sprit, Sanitary ware, Tiles, Ammonium
Phosphate Sulphate, Super Phosphate, PPC Products such as liquids, mixed and straight
fertilizer, soft fertilizer, soft ferrites, audio magnetic tapes, audio
compact cassettes and Acetic Acid. |
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Products : |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Exports to : |
|
||||||||||
|
Countries : |
Nigeria and Zaire |
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Imports from : |
|
||||||||||
|
Countries : |
Raw materials, components and spares and capital Goods
from Belgium, France, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore and USA |
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Terms : |
|
||||||||||
|
Purchasing : |
L/C, D/A or D/P terms |
PRODUCTION STATUS
|
|
|
Licensed
Capacity |
Installed
Capacity |
Actual
Production |
|||
|
Classes of Goods |
Unit |
2007
|
2006 |
2007 |
2006 |
2007 |
2006 |
|
Sugar |
CANE MT/DAY |
NA |
NA |
16500 |
14500 |
380718 |
304953 |
|
Spirit |
KLTS/YEAR |
NA |
NA |
13500 |
13500 |
10673 |
9694 |
|
Sanitaryware |
MT/YEAR |
NA |
NA |
NIL |
34500 |
NIL |
30414 |
|
Power |
KWH |
NA |
NA |
64500 |
42500 |
248533452 |
147541619 |
|
Neem Technicals |
KGS/YEAR |
NA |
NA |
7500 |
7500 |
5333 |
5552 |
|
Algae |
KGS/YEAR |
NA |
NA |
524100 |
NIL |
74415 |
NIL |
GENERAL
INFORMATION
|
No. of Employees : |
3261 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bankers : |
State Bank of India,
Madma Cama Road, Mumbai -400021, Maharashtra |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Facilities : |
|
|
|
|
|
Banking
Relations : |
Good |
|
|
|
|
Auditors : |
|
|
Name : |
Deloitte Haskins & Sells Chartered Accountants |
|
Address : |
Chennai |
|
|
|
|
Associates/Subsidiaries : |
Subsidiary
Companies v Coromandel
Fertilizers Limited v Parry Chemicals Limited v Parry America
Inc. v Parrys
Investments Limited v Parrys Sugar
Limited v Parry
Infrastructure Company Private Limited Associates/Joint
Venture Companies v Parryware Roca
Private Limited (Formerly Parryware Glamourooms Private Limited) v Parry Mosanto
Seeds Private Limited v Godavari
Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited v Prathyusha
Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited v Silkroad Sugar
Private Limited (Formerly Parrys Sugars Refineries Private Limited) |
|
|
|
|
Membership.: |
Confederation of Indian Industry |
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Authorised Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
257500000 |
Equity Shares |
Rs.2/- each |
Rs.515.000 Millions |
|
5000000 |
Preference Shares |
Rs.100/- each |
Rs.500.000 Millions |
|
|
|
Total |
Rs.1015.000 Millions |
Issued, Subscribed & Paid-up Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
89248515 |
Equity Shares |
Rs.2/- each |
Rs.178.500
Millions |
Of the above 34474295 Equity Shares of Rs.2 each
have been allotted as fully paid up for consideration other than cash.
FINANCIAL DATA
[all figures are in Rupees Millions]
ABRIDGED BALANCE
SHEET
|
SOURCES OF FUNDS |
31.03.2007 |
31.03.2006 |
31.03.2005 |
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
1] Share Capital |
178.500 |
178.500 |
178.500 |
|
|
2] Share Application Money |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
3] Reserves & Surplus |
5188.400 |
4694.300 |
4015.900 |
|
|
4] (Accumulated Losses) |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
NETWORTH |
5366.900 |
4872.800 |
4194.400 |
|
|
LOAN FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
1] Secured Loans |
2221.200 |
2312.400 |
1275.200 |
|
|
2] Unsecured Loans |
1302.400 |
175.600 |
558.800 |
|
|
TOTAL BORROWING |
3523.600 |
2488.000 |
1834.000 |
|
|
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES |
736.700 |
480.100 |
507.600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
9627.200 |
7840.900 |
6536.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPLICATION OF FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS [Net Block] |
4791.500 |
3187.100 |
3203.000 |
|
|
Capital work-in-progress |
95.100 |
207.500 |
26.500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT |
1173.600 |
1116.700 |
1012.600 |
|
|
DEFERREX TAX ASSETS |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS, LOANS & ADVANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
1823.900
|
318.500 |
1706.700
|
|
|
Sundry Debtors |
927.100
|
3120.500 |
656.200
|
|
|
Cash & Bank Balances |
2466.800
|
867.500 |
726.800
|
|
|
Other Current Assets |
22.100
|
10.400 |
2.800
|
|
|
Loans & Advances |
679.100
|
1071.300 |
635.500
|
|
Total
Current Assets |
5919.000
|
5388.200 |
3728.000 |
|
|
Less : CURRENT
LIABILITIES & PROVISIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
2211.200
|
1617.100 |
1186.100
|
|
|
Provisions |
146.200
|
458.000 |
273.900
|
|
Total
Current Liabilities |
2357.400
|
2075.100 |
1460.000
|
|
|
Net Current Assets |
3561.600
|
3313.100 |
2268.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES |
5.400 |
16.500 |
25.900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
9627.200 |
7840.900 |
6536.000 |
|
PROFIT & LOSS
ACCOUNT
|
PARTICULARS |
31.03.2007 |
31.03.2006 |
31.03.2005 |
|
|
Sales Turnover |
5517.200 |
9261.800 |
7707.800 |
|
|
Other Income |
1554.600 |
519.800 |
0.000 |
|
|
Total Income |
7071.800 |
9781.600 |
7707.800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/(Loss) Before Tax |
1703.300 |
1411.200 |
1272.600 |
|
|
Provision for Taxation |
429.100 |
252.800 |
230.000 |
|
|
Profit/(Loss) After Tax |
1274.200 |
1158.400 |
1042.600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings in Foreign Currency : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export Earnings |
327.300 |
1528.900 |
|
|
|
Other Earnings |
4.000 |
1.800 |
|
|
Total Earnings |
331.300 |
1530.700 |
187.700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imports : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw Materials |
0.000 |
890.900 |
|
|
|
Stores & Spares |
4.900 |
3.200 |
|
|
|
Capital Goods |
2.700 |
1.000 |
|
|
|
Others |
5.400 |
3.500 |
|
|
Total Imports |
13.000 |
898.600 |
890.400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
3414.200 |
5633.500 |
|
|
|
Employee Cost |
410.700 |
566.200 |
|
|
|
Other Costs |
1236.000 |
1805.300 |
|
|
|
Depreciation |
328.700 |
291.500 |
|
|
|
Interest |
(21.100) |
73.900 |
|
|
Total Expenditure |
5368.500 |
8370.400 |
6438.300 |
|
KEY RATIOS
|
PARTICULARS |
|
31.03.2007 |
31.03.2006 |
31.03.2005 |
|
PAT / Total Income |
(%) |
18.01
|
11.84 |
13.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit Margin (PBT/Sales) |
(%) |
30.87
|
15.23 |
16.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Total Assets (PBT/Total Assets} |
(%) |
28.77
|
26.19 |
34.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Investment (ROI) (PBT/Networth) |
|
0.31
|
0.28 |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Equity Ratio (Total Liability/Networth) |
|
0.43
|
0.42 |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Ratio (Current Asset/Current Liability) |
|
1.61
|
2.04 |
1.91 |
LOCAL AGENCY
FURTHER INFORMATION
Fixed Assets:
Tangible Assets
v Freehold Land
v Leasehold Land
v Buildings
v Plant and Machinery
v Furniture and Office Equipment
v Vehicles
Intangible Assets
v
Patent
Performance
The Company achieved a turnover of Rs.7071.800
Millions including other income of Rs.1554.600 Millions for the year ended
31.03.2007. The Profit before interest and Depreciation grew by 13% to
Rs.2010.900 Millions and Earning before tax was up by 21% to Rs.1703.300
Millions. The Profit after tax (PAT) was Rs.1274.200 Millions (10%) compared to
that of last year amounting to Rs.1158.400 Millions. The profit for the year
includes Rs.1181.200 representing income of a non recurring nature compared to
Rs.228.500 Millions in previous year. Excluding this income (Rs.1181.200
Millions) and the tax thereon (Rs.264.000 Millions) the profit before interest
and depreciation was Rs.829.700 Millions, profit before tax was Rs.522.100
Millions and the profit after tax (PAT) was Rs.357.000 Millions.
Sugar
With a bumper sugarcane crop and increased crushing
capacities sugar production in India has recovered in a short span of time to
record levels resulting in high inventory build up. Further with untimely
government intervention by banning exports of sugar, realization has fallen
sharply. Recent sugar price fall below cost of production has forced Government
of India to review sugar industry policy comprehensively and the process is on.
Unless both the State and Central Governments revise the policy realistically
in terms of cane price, taxes thereon and export of Sugar and price and
movement of Molasses and Ethanol this industry will be ruined. The country will
face large cane payment arrears with consequent effect on the fortunes of the
farmers. Please refer to details provided in Management Discussion and Analysis
report.
The Steep decline in sugar prices in the
second half has restricted the revenue growth to about 22% over the previous
fiscal while the operating profits has come down by about 61%. However
co-generation facilities and distillery contributed to the bottom-line
significantly.
The 18 MW co-generation plant commissioned at
Pudukottai in March, 2006 got stabilized and become fully operational during
the year. The 22 MW cogeneration power plant at Pugalur commenced commercial
operations in March, 2007. The Ethanol and ENA projects at Nellikuppam
Distillery is in progress and awaiting final clearance operations from
statutory authorities.
The registration of the assets of New Horizon
Sugar Mills Limited, Ariyur, Puducherry, acquired from Indian Bank under the
SARFAESI Act on 24th March, 2005 was completed on 24th
August, 2006 and the Ariyur Factory commenced operations during December 2006
and commercial production in March, 2007.
The long term strategy for the sugar division
approved by the board includes increasing crushing capacities in existing
factories, acquisitions, creation of integrated sugar complexes to extract
value from all parts of the cane stick and derisk the sugar business. These
includes setting up of a 20MW co-generation plant at Pettavaittalai and
increasing the overall crushing capacity to 22000 TCD. On completion of the
projects, the annual sugar production would increase to about 6 lakhs tones,
popwer generation would be 127 MW and distillery capacity would be 200 KLPD.
Joint Venture with Cargill Asia Pacific Holdings Pte Limited
International, on 8th December,
2006. Consequent to this, the parties have made an initial subscription to the
share capital of Parrys sugars refineries private limited (name since changed to
Silkroad Sugar Private Limited). This company will set up a stand alone sugar
refinery in Kakinada. The Company holds 50% of the equity capital in the joint
venture.
Bio Pesticides
The Bio Pesticides division of the company has
emerged as a significant supplier in the Neem based bio-pesticide business and
continues to focus on its core product – the NEEMAZAL range of products. The
division is concentrating on development of new products like formulation for
combined fungicide and insecticide activity.
The Division clocked revenue of Rs.226.100
Millions. Export revenues registered a growth 13% over the previous year, with
Americas and Europe continuing to be the major markets. With the launch of
AVANA, a neem based bio pesticide granule, the Company is looking forward to
gain position in Sugarcane and Rice in domestic Market.
Nutraceuticals
Parry Nutraceuticals Limited (PNL), became a
wholly owned subsidiary during the year.
The board considered it desirable to
amalgamate PNL with the company with effect from 1st September 2006,
and accordingly approved a scheme of amalgamation between PNL and EID at the
board meeting held on 19th October 2006.
Based on the petition filed by PNL with the
hon’ble high court of judicature at madras under sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies act, 1956 for sanctioning the Scheme of Amalgamation, the hon’ble
high court vide its order dated 17th April 2007 has approved the
scheme of amalgamation as well as dissolved PNL without the process of winding
up.
Nutraceuticals is now functioning as a
division of the Company.
The products of Nutraceuticals Division are
currently exported to 35 countries in the world which continued to grow in all
the markets serviced by it. Organic Spirulina, the main product of this
business continues to outperform competition in its segment. In the current
year the division made inroads into New Zealand selling Organic Spirulina to
one of the largest brands of Nutraceuticals worldwide.
The organic spirulina produced by the company
is the most certified organic spirulina in the world with 5 quality
certifications and 3 organic certifications to its credit. The organic
spirulina of the division was certified to meet stringent standards such as US
Pharmacopeia, USDA and Naturland – Germany.
For the 7 months period ended 31st
March, 2007 the division registered a turnover of Rs.111.200 Millions.
The performance of the various divisions
during the year 2006-07 is given in detail in the Management Discussion and
Analysis Report forming a part of this report.
Corporate Developments
Parryware
On 1st June, 2006 the company
transferred 432580 equity shares of Rs.10/- each held by the Company in
Parryware Glamourooms Private Limited (PGPL), in favour of ROca Sanitario S.A.,
of Spain, (Roca) for a consideration of about Rs.1185.500 Millions. The PGPL
board also allotted 634840 equity shares of Rs.10/- each PGPL to Roca on the
same day.
Consequent to this PGPL ceased to be a
subsidiary of EID with effect from 1st June, 2006 and became a joint
venture company in which EID and Roca hold 50% equal stake in the Capital. The
name of the company also has been changed to Parryware Roca Private Limited.
Subsidiary Companies
v
Coromandel Fertilizers Limited
Coromandel
Fertilizers Limited (CFL) achieved a turnover of Rs.20842.200 Millions for the
year ended 31st March 2007 and the profit after tax was Rs.1007.400
Millions. The company’s board has recommended a dividend of 100% for the year.
CFL increased its
stake in Godavari Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited (GFCL) from 45.07% to
74.92% and consequently GFCL became a subsidiary of CFL with effect from 12th
April 2007.
v
Parry Chemicals Limited
Parry Chemicals
Limited, a 100% subsidiary of CFL , achieved a turnover of Rs.8.535 Millions for
the year ended 31st March, 2007. The profit after tax was Rs.0.04
Millions. With the surplus of Rs.7.464 Millions brought forward, the balance of
Rs.7.512 Millions was carried to balance sheet.
v
Parrys Sugar Limited
During the first
year of operations, the company’s turnover was Rs. 1.115 Millions and the
Profit after tax was Rs.0.966 Millions.
v
Parry Infrastructure Company Private Limited
The company
incorporated in January 2006 to engage in infrastructure projects like
development of Special Economicx Zones (“SEZ”) etc. became a wholly owned
subsidiary during the year. The company proposes to promote a food processing
SEZ and is taking necessary steps for implementation of this.
v
Parry America Inc.
Parry America
Inc., the 10% subsidiary based in US, reported an income of US$ 32.20 lakhs for
the year ended 31st March 2007. The profit after tax was US$ 0.94
lakhs. After adjusting the carried forward loss of US$ 0.73 lakhs, the profit
carried forward for the year was US$ 0.21 lakhs.
The main business
of this company is to market and sell NeemAzal Technical in US markets and
trading of technical and formulations in Western Countries.
v
Parrys Investments Limited
The company has
reported a business income of Rs.0.138 Millions and made a Net Profit after tax
of Rs.0.103 Millions for the year ended 31st March 2007.
v
Coromandel Bathware Limited
There was no
operation during the year and the loss carried forward for the year was
Rs.19.336 Millions.
Review of E.I.D. Parry’s Business
E.I.D Parry
(Parry), completed its restructuring during 2005-06 by entering into a Joint
Venture with Roca Sanitario S.A. for the sanitaryware business to provide
consistent and increasing returns to its shareholders. Parry has now become a
sugar focused company to become a dominant player in this sector and in also
investing in promising areas like Bio-pesticides and Nutrachemicals. Through
its subsidiaries and JV, viz, Coromandel Fertilizers Limited (CFL), Godavari
Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited (GFCL) and Parryware Roca Private Limited
(PRPL), it retains a significant presence in the fertilizer and the
sanitaryware industries respectively. Parry has all its seven manufacturing
facilities located in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.
The turnover for the
year 2006-07 was Rs.7071.800 Millions (including other income Rs.1554.600
Millions) with the distributable profits amounting to Rs.1274.200 Miilions.
Sugar
Established : 1842
Revenue 2006-07 : Rs.5560.000 Millions
Proportion of
Company’s total income : 94%
Background
Parry has
relentlessly made efforts to build on its core competencies of being one of the
lowest cost producers of sugar even as it de-risks sugar business by extracting
more value from co-products. Around these competencies, Parry is now adding and
developing new facilities of cogeneration of power, ethanol, extra neutral
alcohol, refined sugar etc. This capacity build-up in products and markets will
ensure that the company is well positioned to exploit the large opportunities
offered by emerging trends in the sugarcane business.
Parry as a Sugar Major
Parry as a focused
entity plans to bring large-scale investments into the sugar business by
leveraging its existing assets and strengths in this sector in three broad
directions.
Expand existing sugar units capacities.
The company is
currently in the process of expanding its capacity from current levels of 16500
TCD to 19500 TCD across its existing manufacturing locations. These projects
are estimated to be fully operational by the end of 2007-08. This will help in
optimizing the crushing period by the increase in throughput, with improvements
in process efficiencies, sugar recovery gains and reduced energy (steam plus
power) consumption. The efficiency norms are being benchmarked internationally
and should make these united very low cost producers.
The units are also
being designed to offer a wide range of products to serve broader and more
diverse customer base. The units with built in flexibility will also enable
making of customized product offerings to meet key customer accounts.
Value Addition of Co-products
Cogenerated
Power: The growing energy consumption
in India allows the sugar industry to play an increasingly important role in
the energy economy. Additionally, the power generated and exported by the
co-generation unit is environment friendly (‘green power’) and made available
to rural areas where the mills are located. Thus sugarcane is increasingly
becoming a source of energy. This cogen power is in line with clean development
mechanism (CDM) methodologies which are now clearly defined and carbon credits
are expected to flow soon.
Molasses and
Alcohols : The company has started adding manufacturing units to straddle the
entire value chain of the distillery from industrial alcohol and rectified
spirit to extra neutral alcohol (ENA) and fuel ethanol production.
Implementation of Kyoto Protocol by India requires fuel ethanol blending in
petrol (EBP) to becoming a reality. The government of India has made 5%
blending of ethanol with petrol mendatory which is in the process of being
implemented across all states. This proportion is likely to increase to 10%
shortly, which will create further potential for the producers. Tamil Nadu Sugar mills have negotiated with oil
marketing companies to supply ethanol at about Rs.21.50 per litre (ex-factory).
The industry is also discussing with the government to link ethanol prices to
the international petroleum prices. Some operational issues are also being
worked with the government including considering a policy change to take
administrative control of Molasses and Alcohol movements etc., to the centre as
India needs to implement Kyoto Protocol as a nation.
Future
opportunities
The Company will continue to keep exploring the possibilities for growth
throughGreen field and also acquisitions. A 2500 TCD mill in Tamil Nadu is
underactive consideration and may be commissioned in record time as soon as the
Government approvals are obtained.
GLOBAL
PERSPECTIVE
Growth of Sugar
sector
Countries'
production levels - surplus across major Sugar countries
The global supply response to high prices in the middle of 2005-06 means
that’ sugar supply has grown faster than sugar demand and this has placed
downward pressure on prices in 2006-07. The production has surpassed
consumption for the first time in past six years.
World is experiencing concurrent peak production by most of
the top sugar producing countries with the exception of European Union (EU). It
is noteworthy that world production has increased by a large 8 MMT in 2006-07.
Exports from Brazil and India two of the worlds major sugar
producing countries are forecast to increase more than what was expected
previously as good seasonal conditions have led to higher production in those
countries. In contrast the EU is forecast to reduce exports significantly in
2006-07 in order to meet its obligations to the World Trade Organisation.
The fairer trade practices demanded by WTO, high prices of
oil, global warming, environmental pressure to reduce dependence on fossil
duels and increased use of renewable energy have been directly and indirectly
impacting the sugar business across the world. The two major cane producing
countries Brazil and India have responded with large scale investments in
sugarcane industry (both sugar mills and ethanol plants.). Developed nations as
consumers of petrol and diesel have also responded by kick-starting large
investments for creating a bio-fuels industry. USA has been building a large
ethanol unit based on corn almost every 9 days for 18 months now while EU has
been developing a bio-diesel production and distribution system. Other
important developments in the world ethanol program include the intended brazil-us
ethanol agreement and brazil-japan ethanol talks. All this has fuelled increase
in sugarcane, corn and wheat acreages and prices as land is being used for new
end-use of crops in the transport energy sector. A new debate has commenced on
food versus fuel as the world attempts to re-align its resources between these
two sectors. All this will have a significant impact on world sugar
availability, price and trade.
INDIAN
PERSPECTIVE
Current
Situation in the Domestic Market
The Global situation has been more or less reflected in India. The
rebound of the cane crop and the enthusiastic response to higher cane prices
has resulted in substantial surplus for the Sugar Season 2006-07. Latest
production estimates are around 27 MMT for this Sugar year against the
estimated consumption of
19.5 MMT.
The situation of bumper stock was further aggravated by a Sugar Export
ban effective June 2006 by the Government of India (GOI) (made applicable even
or the mandatory exports under the Advanced Licence Scheme).
As a result, the domestic price of sugar plummeted in the second half of
the year. Simultaneously during this period, the international prices of sugar
also crashed from $ 400 per MT levels to less than $ 320 per MT. The
strengthening of the Indian Rupee further aggravated the sugar exportersí
plight. By the time GOI finally removed the export ban the net realisation was
unremunerative.
The present prices both domestic and export is now below manufacturing
cost since cane prices were fixed based on high prices of sugar ruling at early
part of last year. There were imminent possibilities of cane arrears mounting.
The GOI finally accepted the Industryís pleas and agreed to a series of
immediate term measures for stabilising the sugar prices. The GOI has now announced
subsidies at Rs. 1350 per MT (for a Coastal state) to encourage exports. The
Government of India has also announced a creation of Buffer stock of 2 MMT to
ease the pressure on sugar prices.
Meanwhile alarmed by the deteriorating situation on prices, the amount
of standing cane remaining and possibility of arrears in cane payment, major
cane producing State Governments have stepped in with relief measures. Leading
in this effort is Maharashtra state, which has announced an export subsidy of
its own of Rs. 1000 per MT, over and above the Central Government subsidy
besides a slew of other measures. These include a decrease in cane price for
recovery drops for late season crushing and purchase tax waiver for the entire
season, insurance payment of Rs. 25,000 per acre of standing crop on arrival of
monsoon etc. Karnataka has followed with similar relief packages and Andhra
Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh are expected to follow. Tamil Nadu has so far not taken
any action to help the mills in the state.
The Way Ahead for
Indian Sugar Industry
The policy changes on exports represented a dramatic turnaround in the
Government position but was as usual, only reactive, rather than proactive. The
situation in exports swung through a full cycle of no exports to one of
restrained exports (only ALS obligations) to a export ban and to free exports,
all within one year. This flip-flop has hurt Indiaís reputation, as a sugar
exporter, in the world trade circles and markets.
Even as major policies are being modified on an ad-hoc basis, a plethora
of controls and administrative measures by the Central and State Governments
continue to impact the industry and its overall performance on account of
unresolved contradictions and decision based on political
considerations. These include:
1. Release Order Mechanism: This measure was designed to manage stocks
and prices during times of scarcity and food insecurity. It has lost its
relevance in the current context of assured abundance. It has also become
ineffective due to the ability of the mills to sell above the release orders
through court orders.
2. Reacting to prices in domestic Market by Banning Exports: It must be
noted that only 10% of sugar is now required by the Below Poverty Line
consumers with the balance being sold as Free Sale Quota. More than 2/3rd of
this is consumed by Processed Food and Beverages sector. Thus, the Govtís role
to ìcontrolî prices seems more a concern to manage WPI since Sugar retains a
very high (and unduly so) weightage in this Index.
3. Cane Pricing: Cane pricing is at both the State (State Advised
Prices- SAPs) and Central (Statutory Minimum Price- SMP) Governments level. The
State Governments announce cane prices without any way of linking it to Sugar
prices. There needs to be a proper linkage between cane price and sugar price
realisations.
4. Fuel ethanol industry is emerging and its policy framework is just
evolving: It is necessary that a fair and progressive framework is evolved to
encourage further investments into the sector. In fact, it is this sector that
plays a larger role in energy security and economic development of the country.
There appears to be conflict of interest between State and Central Govt. in the
area of revenue generated by this sector. While Alcohol sold to Potable Liquor
is excisable by State and forms an important revenue source, Alcohol used to
convert into Ethanol is a revenue for Centre. Thus for the nationís larger
cause, the Central and State Governments need to develop a clear path for
Ethanol. These contradictions have to be resolved soon. All controls on this
industry must
be removed and Central Government must play a role only to manage
strategic reserve stock to allay its concern on sugar availability and prices
in ration shops.
As a country we need to take a long term view of sugar exports to carve
out a credible and sustainable share in the world sugar trade. The Indian sugar
industry has demonstrated its ability to keep up supplies even in the drought years
and the bogey of food security should not be used to restrain the industry.
Tamil
Nadu - a Comparative Advantage assessment
Over 85% of Indian Sugar production is concentrated in and around five
states ñ UP, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh.Tamil Nadu
(TN) has several specific advantages which are as follows:-
v Favourable agro
climatic conditions and a two monsoons system leading to longer availability of
cane. Thus several mills in TN crush for about 270 days as against the other
states average of about 160 days. The longer crushing season also provides for
a profitable investment in cogeneration which further increases the overall
profitability of operation in TN.
v The sugarcane
yield per hectare is significantly higher compared to the other states and this
helps in ensuring higher availability of cane at an optimal cost as well as
sustained farmersí interest in the crop.
v Two good ports in
the State provide easy access to the export market especially, South and South
East Asia.
v Good
infrastructure including linking roads, agri-credit through Banks, power supply
for irrigation etc.
v Progressive
farmers and a strong R&D support from the Sugarcane Breeding Institute,
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University at Coimbatore.
However, the long crushing season is partially offset by low recovery
period of crushing and the distance from sugar deficit markets of India (except
Kerala) and high purchase tax on cane neutralises the above advantages thus
decreasing our competitiveness.
Movement of surplus molasses out of Tamil Nadu to other deficit states
and export is subject to several administrative controls besides payment of
export administrative service fee. On account of this, the producers in Tamil
Nadu are unable to realise better prices at the opportune time.
Current
Situation of the State
Tamil Nadu is expected to produce a record high of 2.5 MMT of sugar this
year ñ a substantial jump from the previous year production of 2.17 MMT. Coming
in along with the national surplus, the pressure on prices is felt acutely here
too. SISMA has represented to the State Government for relief measures similar
to
that offered by other states, and is awaiting response.
Performance review
Execution of the Growth and de-risking strategy:-
1. The companyís fifth sugar plant at Puducherry has commenced
operations and achieved the rated production capacity within a short period of
time. The projects to increase throughputs in the four sugar units in Tamil
Nadu are progressing well and the capacity is likely to be increased to 19500
TCD by the year end. The Company is also planning another green-field unit in
Tamil Nadu to be completed in record time to increase the overall capacity to
22000 TCD.
2. The 22 MW Cogeneration unit has been commissioned in Pugalur. This,
in addition to the existing two units with a total capacity of 43 MW is a 50 %
increase in cogeneration capacity. Another cogeneration plant is currently
under construction in Pettavaittalai and will be commissioned by the year end.
3. The existing Distillery at Nellikuppam is being converted into a
multiproduct unit with ENA and Ethanol production facilities. The Unit is also
likely to be expanded and with two more distilleries planned, the Company will
be able to value-add all the Molasses it produces (currently only 1/3rd).
The Company crushed 41.95 lakh tonnes (25.97) of cane with Y-O-Y growth
of 62% with a recovery of 8.93% (8.80%), thus sugar production has increased to
3.81 LMT (3.05). The Company continued to make substantial revenues from
co-products, its export to grid were at 1630 lakh units (943) with a Y-O-Y
growth of 73%.
Sugar Score Card
(Rs. In Millions)
|
|
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
|
Revenue |
4151.700 |
5525.400 |
7246.300 |
5559.200 |
|
EBIDT |
551.000 |
892.800 |
990.900 |
576.400 |
|
EBIT |
345.800 |
701.200 |
796.700 |
308.000 |
|
Capital Employed |
3391.200 |
3463.100 |
4008.200 |
5142.700 |
|
ROCE |
10% |
20% |
20% |
6% |
Significant amount of insulation is provided from Cogen and Distillery operations,
which do not follow the sugar cycles. This is leading to a change in the
overall mix of revenues and profitability of the Sugar Division. The
profitability of an integrated sugar model is thus not dependent solely upon
sugar prices.
This
change in the product mix lends greater stability and predictability to the
financial performance of the Company. With the completion of new investments in
Co-products, the share of the profitability from Co-products will increase
substantially in the coming years and thus de-risking from Sugar cycles.
EID
Parry - USPs
Parry
has been able to achieve a position of leadership in Tamil Nadu and also be a
player of national importance with the help of several business practices and innovations.
These practices span all areas of operations.
Sugarcane:
1.
Cane R&D:
a.
Parry is the only sugar Company in India to run an exclusive R&D wing and
breeding program which has generated several promising new high yielding cane
varieties with higher sucrose-content and more pest resistance, matching the
local soil conditions.
b.
Satellite mapping: Parry is involved in conducting soil
survey and map the same with the help of satellite imageries by developing farm
land database.
c.
Drip irrigation systems: Parry is enabling the farmers to use
low cost drip irrigation system with estimated water savings of about 40%. With
the Tamil Nadu State Govtís recently announced capital subsidies,
the
Company expects to increase cane acreage under drip irrigation to at least 10
%.
2.
Cane Development:
a.
Extension: Parry gives extensive support to the farmers in managing
their cane through its Cane Extension team. The team has been further
strengthened by employing Agri-graduates from premier universities. The team
works closely with the farmers to help them in better farming practices,
monitoring the crop throughout the year, crop protection from pests and
diseases and increasing the land productivity.
b.
Farmer Services: Parry transfers good farm management from labto- land
through demos,farmer training sessions for better yield improvements; offers
its cane growers agri credit through Banks and unique insurance policies
covering both the crop at the individual plot level and personal accident at
the grower level. Parry organises internet kiosks called ìParrys Cornerî to
help the farmers avail cane services at their doorsteps. Banking services
available at their doorstep are special services offered for better business
partnership.
Marketing:
The
Company offers now a wider range of Sugar to broader & more diverse
Customer base. Parry also specialises in making tailor-made products to suit
customer needs. This diversification effort is not restricted only to Sugar,
but has been further extended to include ENA, Ethanol etc. This allows Company
to extract the inherent & intrinsic value of every part of the stick of
Sugarcane.
Expansions:
Taking
forward its expansion plans, the Company has operationalised the newly acquired
Puducherry unit at Ariyur, stabilised Pudukottai Cogeneration Unit,
commissioned Pugalur Cogeneration unit and is poised for growth in the entire
segment in coming years.
Refinery
Joint Venture
E.I.D.-Parry
(India) Ltd and Cargill International S.A. have entered into a joint venture to
set up a port-based stand-alone sugar refinery in Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh.
With an ultimate capacity to produce one million tons of refined sugar per
year, this refinery set up in Kakinada will be the largest in the South Asian
region. The joint venture will be setting up the refinery close to the Kakinada
port. The refinery will be a processing operation, importing the entire raw
material, raw sugar, adding value by refining it, and exporting its entire
production. Parry holds 50% in the joint venture.
Risk
Management
The
Company continues to practise risk management to increase the probability of
the Company achieving its set Goals and Objectives. And Risk Management, though
often called as a Process, it is actually a Practice
in
the Organisation.
The following
are the major risks associated with the sugar business:
Raw
material risk: Sugarcane is the main raw material for sugar and any
disturbance on its timely availability will have a substantial impact on
operational cost. This is likely to be caused by the following reasons:
Climatic
conditions: The crop and availability of cane in TN is influenced by
both the monsoon (South-West and North-East). Local weather conditions over the
crop cycle affects both the quantity and quality of cane
available.
Cane
Economics: The profitability of alternative crops will influence
the area of planting under cane; pests and disease and availability of farm
labour also impact the cost incurred by the cane grower.
Mitigation
Measure: The Company has always maintained an amicable
relationship with its farmers. It has paid up all dues on time, despite the
arrears having been on the rise in the industry as a whole. With its goodwill
and the time tested policy of ethical dealings, the Companyís risk of a raw
material short supply will be mitigated with the farmers in the addressable
area continuing to plant sugar cane. Further, with experiments in farm
mechanisation, drip irrigation, improved cane varieties (developed through the
Research and Development facility), carefully monitored scheduling of cane
planting and harvesting, the Company is confident of mitigating the risk.
Policy
risk: The policies on cane are regulated by both the Central
and State Government and they currently have a considerable hold on this
industry by being able to fix the raw material price and to influence the sugar
selling price. Further the control of the Governments (State and Central)
include:-
v
Exports (Permission / incentives)
v
Imports ( Permission/tariffs)
v
Sugar pricing (Release orders and Levy)
v
Command Area demarcation from time to time
v
Molasses movement control
Mitigation
Measure: The Company works closely with ISMA and SISMA towards
developing an industry point of view and appropriate policy recommendations to have
dialogue with the Government. These include formulation of policy on Ethanol
doping, review of cogeneration policy, Decontrol of Sugar, review of sugar
weightage in WPI etc.
Price
risk: The cyclicality of Sugar business does have a final call
on the sugar prices and thus affecting profitability.
Mitigation
Measure: The company has taken the following measures to insulate
itself against the price risk by two ways ñ
1.
Focusing on value added products like Pharma grade refined sugar,
high
quality plantation white sugar and retail packs to derive a better
margin.
2.
Direct supplies to large Institutions and retail chains.
Outlook
summary:
Indian
sugar industry is going through a very critical phase where within a short
period of time the situation has turned from one of ìshort supply and high
pricesî to one of ìexcess supply and low pricesî. While part of this is due to
Government interventions, some of them are due to increased alignment with
world scenario. While in the short term, relief measures have been announced to
bring back stability of sugar prices, the long term outlook for sugar remains
positive and promising for the following reasons:-
v
ï Growing demand for sugar especially internal consumption
led strong GDP growth and changing food habits
v
ï Opportunity from Fuel Ethanol blending program
v
ï Opportunity from Cogeneration of Power
v
ï Opportunities for India to become a structural Sugar
exporter and participate in the South Asian Sugar market provided an enabling
conducive policy framework is put in place by GOI
v
ï Important developments in the World Ethanol program and
its impact on World Sugar availability.
Bio
Products
A.
Bio Pesticides
Established
: 1994
Revenue,
2006-07 : Rs.26 Million
Proportion
of Companyís total Income : 4%
Exports : Rs 180.000Millions
Highlights
2006-07
v
AVANA - Neem based bio pesticide granule was launched
successfully for controlling pests in the Sugarcane and Paddy in the domestic
market.
v
With new registrations, export sales opened up in the
markets like Columbia, Brazil, Korea and Australia.
v
Parry America Inc., wholly owned subsidiary of Parry, is
taking all efforts to establish significant presence in the Home & Gardens
segment in America.
Divisional
Performance
ï
Revenue at Rs.26 Millions & Aza Technical sales volumes at 4 MT remained
more or less at the last year's level.
The
Bio Pesticides division of the Company has emerged as a significant supplier in
the Neem based bio-pesticide business and continues to focus on its core
product - the NEEMAZAL® range of products.
Industry
Scenario and Development
The
Global Bio pesticide market is estimated at Mn. 672 $ accounting for 2% of
global pesticide sale with the remaining 98% being markets for Synthetic
pesticides.
Neem
based bio pesticides come under the category of ëPlant extractsí based bio
pesticides which accounts for Mn.60 $. The sale of Aza based products is valued
to be Mn. 25 $.
By
2010, Global Bio pesticide is estimated to grow to Mn 1075 $ at a CAGR of 10%.
On these growth projections, the Plant Extracts business will be at Mn.160 $
and the business for Aza based products will be at Mn. 67 $.
The
Bio pesticide market is distributed in Americas (45%), Europe (35%) and rest of
the world (20%). Asia offers the highest growth potential because of the size
of the prospective market.
Performance
Export
Sales and Revenues registered a growth over the previous year, with America and
Europe continuing to be the major markets. China and Korea registered sales as
planned.
During
the year, Sales in the domestic markets did not grow due to unfavourable
seasonal conditions and change in Sales and Distribution Model from Trade
Channel to Institution. This one time correction of shifting to
Institutional
model coupled with the season failure has resulted in reduced sales in the
Domestic markets.
During
the year, Thyagavalli unit reached a landmark of achieving 1000 kg production
in a month demonstrating the potential to reach the name plate capacity.
Outlook
The
Division is operating in the ëPlant Extractsí segment of Bio pesticide
industry, which is projected to grow to Mn.160 $ by 2010. The demand for
organic and residue free food is continuing to grow worldwide. The Companyís
products command a premium over its competitors, both in the domestic and
export markets.
The
Division is constantly working through its R&D team to continuously come
out with totally new and modified products. This will facilitate the business
to address the growing and diversified customer requirements across the global
markets.
Going
forward, the divisionís prospects are expected to be on the growth path.
B.
Nutraceuticals
Parry
Nutraceuticals Ltd. merged with Parry effective 1st September, 2006 and is
currently functioning as a division of your Company.The Nutraceuticals division
clocked a turnover of Rs. 111.200 millions for the 7 months
period
ended 31st March, 2007. The products of this business continued to grow in all
the markets and is currently exported to 35 countries. Organic Spirulina, the
main product of this business continue to outperform competition in its
segment. In the current year the Company made inroads into New Zealand by
selling Organic Spirulina to one of the largest brands of Nutraceuticals
worldwide. The Company also got the prestigious account of Cosway, Malaysia for
its Organic Spirulina.
The
Organic Spirulina produced by your Company is the most certified Organic
Spirulina in the world with 5 quality certifications and 3 Organic
Certifications to its credit. The Organic Spirulina of the division was
certified to meet stringent standards such as US Pharmacopeia, USDA and
Naturland - Germany.
Nutraceuticals
division
Business
Established : March 2000
Merged
with EID Parry : 1st Sep 2006
Revenues
from 1st Sep 06 to 31st Mar 07 : Rs 11.12 Million
Proportion
of Company's total Income : 2%
Exports
: Rs 90.700Millions
Highlights
2006-07
During
the year, two new strains of Algae were successfully experimented in small scale
for commercial production of Omega 3 EPA and DHA. Additional ponds have been
built to expand and commence limited commercial production. The products from
these Algae would cater to heart health and brain health and is expected to hit
the market in the 2nd half of the FY 2007-08.
Industry
Scenario and Development
The
size of the global Nutraceutical industry is estimated well over US $ 15
billion per annum growing at 10% per annum. With increasing medical care costs
and aging population in the west, Nutraceuticals as a category of preventive
health care is bound to grow at a steady pace. Within the category, the
Microalgal segment estimated at US $ 300 million and is growing at 7-8 % per
annum covering Spirulina, Carotenoids like beta carotene, Astaxanthin and the
fast growing omega 3 fatty acids.
The
Nutraceutical industry is increasingly being regulated world wide for
standardisation and product claims. Much money is being spent by leading
players in the Nutraceutical industry establishing product claims through
clinical studies. There is also a clear trend of Nutraceutical integrating with
food and thereby establishing a fast growing segment called Functional foods.
The
Division currently produces 3 different types of microalgae ñ Organic Spirulina,
Dunaliella (Natural Mixed Carotenoids) and Haematococcus (Astaxanthin) at its
Oonaiyur facility. The Company is also developing
technologies
for the production of Omega 3 fatty acids EPA and DHA from 2 new strains of
microalgae.
Performance
The
Division has emerged as a global leader in Organic Spirulina business and is
continuing with its R&D efforts to research new strains of algae to widen
its product basket.
During
2006-07, the acceptance of the Companyís products continued to grow in all the
markets serviced by it.
Outlook
The
Nutraceutical industry is set to play a significant role in managing increasing
health care costs and improving the quality of life in aging population world
wide, with increasing shift in customer preferences to natural alternate
ingredients
to synthetic components with emphasis on disease prevention rather than disease
treatment. The Company is set to participate in a very significant segment of
Omega 3 fatty acids which is currently the fastest growing segment backed by scientific
claims and studies. The Food Safety and Standards Bill 2006 will trigger the
growth of this nascent industry in India.
As per web details
Established in the year 1788, Parry is presently engaged in a wide galaxy of diversified activities. It became a member of the Murugappa group in the year 1981 and thereafter the story has been one of turnaround and of steady growth.
Currently, subject has evolved into one of the largest business groups in the country.
It is engaged in the manufacture and marketing of a wide-range of products that
can be broadly divided into the following two groups:
v
Parryware –
Ceramic Sanitary ware
v
Sugar, Bio-Products & Chemicals – Sugar, Alcohol, Power, Bio-products.
The company has been a pioneer in many fields, including setting up of India's
first chemical fertiliser plant - at Ennore, Sugar plant - at Nellikuppam and
Sanitaryware plant - at Ranipet.
A strong sense of commitment and adherence to business ethics has helped subject succeed in bringing
to life the larger picture and to ‘Go Beyond’ in all their ventures.
Awards
Subject has always been a pioneer- be it in developing and introducing quality products in the market or conforming to environmental standards even before they become mandatory. Given below are some of the prestigious awards and achievements won by the company:
SUGAR DIVISION:
Nellikuppam
has been recognized as a Zero-waste plant with a strict adherence to quality and high
productivity. They have been the recipients of several awards and
certifications with the course of time. Some of the most significant achievements
by the company are:
v ISO 14001 certification in Pudukottai & Nellikuppam
v The recipients of the Green Tech Award on Safety
v Instrumental in organizing a SHE event at the Murugappa Group level
PARRYWARE:
ISO 14001-1996
Adding to its long list of firsts, Parryware, India’s number one Sanitaryware
brand has become the first and only Indian company in the Sanitaryware industry
to be conferred ‘Superbrand of India’ status for the year 2003.
All Parryware manufacturing plants at Ranipet, Alwar & Dewas have been accorded ISO14001: 1996 Environmental Management system certifications by British Standards Institute (BSI) an internationally renowned certification agency incorporated in UK by Royal Charter.
With this certification, the entire Parryware & Johnson Pedder ranges of sanitary ware manufactured by EID Parry (India) Limited are to be manufactured in plants that follow environmentally responsible practices.
Parryware’s environmental management system policy commits the business to prevention of pollution, optimal utilization of resources and reduction in generation of wastes.
The quality management system certification is an assertive statement of their intent to become a more customer focused, responsive & learning organization
Press Release
The turnover of subject for the quarter ended 31st December
2007 was Rs.1972.800 Millions(Rs. 1542.800Millions). A loss of Rs. 163.200
Millions (gross profit of Rs.31.500 Millions) after absorbing depreciation of
Rs. 110.300 Millions was incurred at the operating level. After absorbing
interest cost of Rs.68.500 Millions (interest income of Rs. 9.200 Millions) the
loss for the quarter was Rs.231.700 Millions (profit of Rs. 40.700 Millions)
Low dometic and international prices, rupee appreciation making exports
unattractive and high inventory carrying cost have resulted in a net loss of
Rs.233.300 Millions. The selling price of sugar prevailing now is lower than
the cost of production.
Sugar Division
During the quarter the company crushed 5.16 lakhs tones of cane compared
to 6.11 lakh tones in the corresponding period of 2006-07. The overall production
of sugar was 43784 MT(49827 MT). The average sugar realization per MT for the
quarter was Rs.12535 compared to Rs. 15985 for the corresponding period of
2006-07. The company exported 503 lakh
units to the TNEB grid compared to 221 lakhs units for the corresponding period
of 2006-07.
During the quarter the company exported 83688 MT, including 52691 MT of
raw sugar.
The sugar Segment reported a loss of Rs.281.200 Millions for the quarter
(loss Rs. 6.100 Millions). The loss consists of Rs.320.200 Millions for the
quarter for sugar (loss of Rs. 22.700 Millions) while the PBIT for the
cogeneration segment was Rs.22.600 Millions (Rs.7.800 Millions) and the
distillery segment Rs. 16.400 Millions(Rs. 8.800 Millions.
Bio-Product
Division
Both the Neem based pesticides and the Nutraceuticals performed better
than the corresponding quarter of 2006-07.
While the Bio-Pesticides segment reported a profit of Rs. 22.000
Millions for the quarter (profit Rs.17.100 Millions) the loss for the
Nutraceuticals segment was Rs. 0.400 Millions(profit Rs.3.200 Millions).
Interest
Higher Level of Inventory and higher rate of interest have resulted in
higher interest cost of Rs. 68.500 Millions for the quarter compared to
previous year.
Addition to the
Board
The board of directors have appointed Mr. K Raghunandan , president
(sugar) as deputy Managing Director of the Company with effect from 1st
February 2008.
About Them
Subject is a member of Murugappa Group. Headquartered in Chennai, the
USD 2 Billion (Rs.85000.000 Millions) Murugappa Group is India’s leading
business conglomerate. Market leaders in diverse areas of business including
engineering, abrasives, finance, general insurance, sanitaryware, cycles,
sugar, farm inputs, fertilizers, plantations, bio-products and nutraceuticals,
its 29 registered companies have manufacturing facilities spread across 14
states in India. The organization fosters an environment of professionalism and
has a workforce of over 30000 Employees.
The group has forged strong joint venture alliances with leading
international companies like GOa, Cargill, DBS Bank, Mitsui Sumitomo and Groupe
Chimique Tunisien and has consolidated its status as one of the fastest growing
diversified business houses in India.
CMT REPORT (Corruption,
Money Laundering & Terrorism]
The Public Notice information has been collected from various sources
including but not limited to: The Courts, India Prisons Service,
Interpol, etc.
1] INFORMATION ON
DESIGNATED PARTY
No exist designating subject or any of its beneficial owners,
controlling shareholders or senior officers as terrorist or terrorist
organization or whom notice had been received that all financial transactions
involving their assets have been blocked or convicted, found guilty or against whom
a judgement or order had been entered in a proceedings for violating
money-laundering, anti-corruption or bribery or international economic or
anti-terrorism sanction laws or whose assets were seized, blocked, frozen or
ordered forfeited for violation of money laundering or international
anti-terrorism laws.
2] Court Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that subject is
or was the subject of any formal or informal allegations, prosecutions or other
official proceeding for making any prohibited payments or other improper
payments to government officials for engaging in prohibited transactions or
with designated parties.
3] Asset Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that the property or assets of the subject are
derived from criminal conduct or a prohibited transaction.
4] Record on Financial
Crime :
Charges or conviction
registered against subject: None
5] Records on Violation of
Anti-Corruption Laws :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
6] Records on Int’l
Anti-Money Laundering Laws/Standards :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
7] Criminal Records
No
available information exist that suggest that subject or any of its principals have
been formally charged or convicted by a competent governmental authority for
any financial crime or under any formal investigation by a competent government
authority for any violation of anti-corruption laws or international anti-money
laundering laws or standard.
8] Affiliation with
Government :
No record
exists to suggest that any director or indirect owners, controlling
shareholders, director, officer or employee of the company is a government
official or a family member or close business associate of a Government
official.
9] Compensation Package :
Our market
survey revealed that the amount of compensation sought by the subject is fair
and reasonable and comparable to compensation paid to others for similar
services.
10] Press Report :
No press reports / filings exists on
the subject.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
MIRA INFORM as part of its Due Diligence do provide comments on
Corporate Governance to identify management and governance. These factors often
have been predictive and in some cases have created vulnerabilities to credit
deterioration.
Our Governance Assessment focuses principally on the interactions
between a company’s management, its Board of Directors, Shareholders and other
financial stakeholders.
CONTRAVENTION
Subject is not known to have contravened any existing local laws,
regulations or policies that prohibit, restrict or otherwise affect the terms
and conditions that could be included in the agreement with the subject.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.39.73 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.77.34 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.57.80 |
SCORE & RATING
EXPLANATIONS
|
SCORE FACTORS |
RANGE |
POINTS |
|
HISTORY |
1~10 |
9 |
|
PAID-UP CAPITAL |
1~10 |
9 |
|
OPERATING SCALE |
1~10 |
9 |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION |
|
|
|
--BUSINESS SCALE |
1~10 |
10 |
|
--PROFITABILIRY |
1~10 |
8 |
|
--LIQUIDITY |
1~10 |
9 |
|
--LEVERAGE |
1~10 |
9 |
|
--RESERVES |
1~10 |
9 |
|
--CREDIT LINES |
1~10 |
9 |
|
--MARGINS |
-5~5 |
- |
|
DEMERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--BANK CHARGES |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--LITIGATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--OTHER ADVERSE INFORMATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
MERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--SOLE DISTRIBUTORSHIP |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--EXPORT ACTIVITIES |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--AFFILIATION |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--LISTED |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--OTHER MERIT FACTORS |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
TOTAL |
|
81 |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
RATING
EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest capability
for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors carry similar weight in credit
consideration. Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems
comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
NR |
In view of the lack of information, we have no basis upon which to
recommend credit dealings |
No Rating |
|