![]()
|
Report Date : |
14.03.2008 |
IDENTIFICATION
DETAILS
|
Name : |
EVEREADY INDUSTRIES INDIA LIMITED |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
1, Middleton
Street, Kolkata – 700 071, West Bengal |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
India |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.03.2007 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
20.06.1934 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
21-7993 |
|
|
|
|
CIN No.: [Company
Identification No.] |
L31402WB1934PLC007993 |
|
|
|
|
TAN No.: [Tax
Deduction & Collection Account No.] |
CALE01744B |
|
|
|
|
PAN No.: [Permanent
Account No.] |
AAACE5778N |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
A public limited
liability company. The company’s shares are listed on the Stock Exchanges |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Manufacturing of
Dry Cell Batteries, Flashlights, Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide, Cinema Arc
Carbons and Black Tea. |
RATING &
COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Aa |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
Maximum Credit Limit : |
USD 24449064 |
|
|
|
|
Status : |
Excellent |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Regular |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
|
|
|
|
Comments : |
Subject is an old
and well established company having two segments of business namely
production and sale of batteries, flashlights and packet tea and production,
sale and export of bulk tea, from the tea estates owned by the company. Trade relations
are reported as fair. Payments are reported as correct and as per
commitments. The company can
be considered normal for business dealings at usual trade terms and
conditions. |
LOCATIONS
|
Registered
Office : |
1, Middleton
Street, Kolkata – 700 071, West Bengal, India |
|
Tel. No.: |
91-33-22882147/3950
/ 22476922 / 22883950 |
|
Fax No.: |
91-33-22884059 /
22884059 |
|
E-Mail : |
|
|
Website : |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Office : |
2, Rainey Park,
Kolkata – 700 019, West Bengal |
|
Tel. No.: |
91-33-24764995 /
24751961 / 24559213 |
|
Fax No.: |
91-33-24753673 /
24864673 |
|
E-Mail : |
|
|
Website : |
|
|
|
|
|
Factory : |
Manufacturing locations:
ò
BATTERY
MANUFACTURING UNITS: National
Carbon Plant ·
5, Rustomjee Parsee Road, Cossipore, Kolkata – 700 002, West Bengal ·
1, Taratola Road, Kolkata – 700 088, West Bengal ·
1075, Tiruvottiyur High Road, Chennai – 600 019, Tamil Nadu ·
Industrial Area, Moula Ali, Hyderabad – 500 040, Andhra Pradesh ·
B-1, Sector-80, Noida Phase-II, Gautam Budh Nagar - 201 305, Uttar
Pradesh – Battery
Plant
ò
PLASTIC
PROCESSING UNIT Plastics Processing Plant, B-2, Sector-80, Phase-II, District Gautam
Budh Nagar – 201 305, Uttar Pradesh ò
FLASHLIGHT
MANUFACTURING UNIT: The Eveready Flashing Plant, Mill Road, Aishbaug, Lucknow – 226 004,
Uttar Pradesh ò
METALS &
ALLOYS MANUFACTURING UNITS: ·
Metals & Ores Plant P-4, Transport Depot Road, Kolkata – 700
088, West Bengal ·
Metals & Ores Plant 123/2 & 3 Ponneri Road, Vaikadu
Village, Manali New Town, Chennai - 600103 ò
ELECTROLYTIC
MANGANESE DIOXIDE MANUFACTURING UNIT: Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide Plant Plot D-4, Trans Thane Creek, Industrial
Area, Thane Belapur Road, Turbhe, Navi Mumbai – 400 705, Maharashtra ò
MACHINERY &
PARTS MANUFACTURING UNIT: Central Machine Shop Developed Plot No. 1, Industrial Estate,
Guindy, Chennai – 600 032, Tamil Nadu Central Machine
Shop 1075
Tiruvottiyur High Road, Chennai - 600 019 Packet Tea Factory Chuapara, Dist.
Jalpaiguri, West Bengal |
|
|
|
|
Overseas representative |
15, Scotts Road, # 03-01, Thong Teek Building, Singapore – 228 128 |
|
Tel. No.: |
91-65-22359290/22359844 |
|
Fax No.: |
91-65-22357950 |
|
E-Mail : |
|
|
|
|
|
Branches
: |
Ahmedabad Shop No.126/1-6,Shri Raghuvir, Estate,National Highway
No.8, Aslali,Ahmedabad-382425 Bangalore 21D,2nd Cross,1st.Stage, Peenya Industrial
Area, Banglore - 560058 Cuttack Plot no.2658,AT/PO - Bhanpur, Cuttack - 753011 Chennai 748, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600035 Cochin V/759, Edapally Muvattupuzha Road, Club Junction,
Edapally, Cochin 682 024 New
Delhi UCO Bank Building, 5,Parliament Street, New Delhi - 110001 Guwahati Ashirwad, House No. 291, Juri Path, Zoo Narangi Road,
Guwahati - 781024 Hyderabad D.NO.7-20/65, A - Block, Opp. Eenadu Press, Moosapet,
Sanathnagar, Hyderabad - 18 Indore 2-10,T.T.Nagar, Dewas Naka, Indore-452010 (MP) 91-731-5021719, 4065960 Jaipur F-527,Road No.6, VKI Area, Jaipur - 13 Kolkata Jeevan Deep Building,3rd. Floor, 1, Middleton Street,
Kolkata - 700071 Lucknow 6/A, Jeet Palace,Sapru Marg, Lucknow - 226001 Mumbai Laxmi Building, Ist. Floor, Sir P.M.Road, Fort, Mumbai -
400001 Patna S.P.Verma Road, Patna - 800001 |
DIRECTORS
|
Name : |
Mr. B. M. Khaitan
|
|
Designation : |
Chairman |
|
Qualification
: |
B. Com. |
|
Date of
Appointment : |
01.04.2000 |
|
Previous
Employment |
The Bishnauth Tea
Company Limited – Chairman & Managing Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Deepak
Khaitan |
|
Designation : |
Executive Vice
Chairman and Managing Director |
|
Qualification
: |
B. Com MBA
(Geneva) |
|
Date of
Appointment : |
01.06.1999 |
|
Previous
Employment |
The Bishnauth Tea
Company Limited- Manager T.E. |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. A. Roy |
|
Designation : |
Whole Time
Director |
|
Qualification
: |
B. Tech., (Hons) |
|
Date of
Appointment : |
02.04.1971 |
|
Previous
Employment |
GEC of India
Limited-Executive Assistant |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. V. Bhandari |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Sanjiv Goenka |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. P. K. Kaul |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. A. Khaitan |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Bhaskar Mitter |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Diwan Arun Nanda |
|
Designation : |
Non-Executive Directors |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. P. H. Ravikumar |
|
Designation : |
Nominee of ICICI Bank Limited |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. A. Roy |
|
Designation : |
Wholetime Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. S. Saha |
|
Designation : |
Wholetime Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. S R Dasgupta |
|
Designation : |
Director |
KEY EXECUTIVES
|
Name : |
Mrs. T. Punwani |
|
Designation : |
General Manager Legal & Company
Secretary |
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
/ SHAREHOLDING PATTERN
|
Names
of Shareholders (As on 31.03.2007):- |
No. of Shares |
Percentage of Holding |
|
Promoters
holdings |
|
|
|
Promoters |
26382135 |
36.30% |
|
Persons acting in concert |
3111233 |
4.28% |
|
Sub-Total |
29493368 |
40.58% |
|
Non
Promoter Holdings |
|
|
|
Institutional investors |
|
|
|
Mutual Funds and UTI |
10342752 |
14.23% |
|
Banks, Financial Institutions , Insurance
Companies (Central / State Government Institutions /
Non Government Institutions) |
4978511 |
6.85% |
|
FIIs |
15537958 |
21.38% |
|
Sub-Total |
30859221 |
42.46% |
|
Others |
|
|
|
Private Corporate
bodies |
2220175 |
3.05% |
|
Indian Public |
9734782 |
13.39% |
|
NRIs / OCBs |
379714 |
0.52% |
|
Sub-Total |
12334671 |
16.96% |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
72687260 |
100.00% |
BUSINESS DETAILS
|
Line of
Business : |
Manufacturing of
Dry Cell Batteries, Flashlights, Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide, Cinema Arc
Carbons and Black Tea. |
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Products : |
|
PRODUCTION STATUS (as on 31.3.2007):-
|
Particulars |
Unit |
Licensed Capacity |
Installed Capacity |
Actual Production |
|
Batteries (2) |
Million PCs |
1624.50 |
1350.00 |
1131.01 |
|
Flashlights (2) |
Million PCs |
23.00 |
12.50(3) |
8.29 |
|
Carbon Electrodes
(2) & (4) |
Million PCs |
470.00 |
580.00 |
461.69 |
|
Casting , Hard
Facing And Tube Rods |
Tonne |
150.00 |
150.00 |
2.19 |
|
Electrolytic
Manganese Dioxide |
Tonne |
--- |
5000.00 |
--- |
|
Machinery (2) |
Nos. |
50.00 |
50.00 |
--- |
|
Machinery Parts
(2) |
Nos. |
500.00 |
500.00 |
--- |
|
Moulded Plastics
Components (2) & (4) |
Tonne |
1500.00 |
375.00 |
155.25 |
|
Packet Tea |
Tonne |
NA |
9000.00 |
7494.63 |
GENERAL
INFORMATION
|
Suppliers : |
· Ajit Industries, · Ambica Chemical and Industrial Corporation, · Anand Industries, · Global Printing and Packaging Company Private Limited · Hunan Jmc Xinshao Company Limited · Binay Lamps and Lighting, · Lakshmi Industries, · Neman! Poly Products Private Limited · Pet Metal Private Limited · Paharimata Packaging Industries, · Petrocarb, · Pigments and Chemical Industries Private Limited . ·
Sohoni Metal Craft Private Limited. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No. of
Employees : |
5182 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bankers : |
v Allahabad Bank v American Express Bank Limited v Central Bank of India v Citibank N. A. v HDFC Bank Limited v ICICI Bank Limited v Indian Bank v Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Limited v State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur v State Bank of India v UCO Bank v United Bank of India |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Facilities : |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Banking Relations : |
Good |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Auditors 1 : |
S. B. Billimoria
& Company Chartered Accountants |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Auditors 2: |
Deollitte Haskins
and Sells Chartered
Accountants |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Membership: |
Confederation of
Indian Industry |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Associates/Subsidiaries
: |
v Williamson Magor Group v Murablack India Limited v McNally Bharat Engineering Company Limited v Williamson Financial Services Limited v Worthington Pump (India) Limited v Kilburn Engineering Limited v Light Metal Industries Limited v India Foils Limited v Standard Batteries Limited v Kilburn Reprographics Limited v Energizer India Limited v Babcock Borgig Limited v Dewrance Macneill and Company Limited v Macneill Engineering Limited v Kilburn Electricals Limited v McNama Consultant Limited v Veco India Limited v Project India Blend Limited v Dakorji Properties Limited v Deutsche Babcock Limited and others SUBSIDIARIES v Nepal Battery Company Limited v
Dufflaghur
Investments Limited |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Authorised Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
111560000 |
Equity Shares |
Rs. 5/- Each |
Rs.557.800 millions |
Issued, Subscribed & Paid-up Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
72687260 |
Equity Shares |
Rs. 5/- Each |
Rs.363.436
millions |
Of the above Shares:-
576514 Shares were
allotted as fully paid up pursuant to a contract without payment being received
in cash.
21329782 Shares
were allotted as fully paid up Bonus Shares by Capitalisation of General
Reserve and 2892700 Shares were issued out of Share Premium Account.
23196002 Shares
were allotted as fully paid up other than in cash pursuant to Scheme of
Amalgamation.
15968258 shares
represent 15968258 Global Depository Receipts.
940000 shares
represent warrants converted into equity shares.
FINANCIAL DATA
[all figures are in Rupees Millions]
ABRIDGED BALANCE
SHEET
|
SOURCES OF FUNDS |
31.03.2007 |
31.03.2006 |
31.03.2005 |
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
1] Share Capital |
363.436 |
358.736 |
278.895 |
|
|
2] Share Application Money |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
3] Reserves & Surplus |
5748.830 |
5983.232 |
4157.083 |
|
|
4] (Accumulated Losses) |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
NETWORTH |
6112.266 |
6341.968 |
4435.978 |
|
|
LOAN FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
1] Secured Loans |
4000.652 |
3471.656 |
4961.444 |
|
|
2] Unsecured Loans |
588.254 |
320.107 |
125.239 |
|
|
TOTAL BORROWING |
4588.906 |
3791.763 |
5086.683 |
|
|
DEFERRED PAYMENT
LIABILITY |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
DEFERRED TAX
LIABILITY (NET) |
42.452 |
60.459 |
26.976 |
|
|
SHARE WARRANT |
55.195 |
64.125 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
10798.819 |
10258.315 |
9549.637 |
|
|
APPLICATION OF FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS [Net Block] |
8247.769 |
8594.763 |
8925.941 |
|
|
Capital work-in-progress |
788.862 |
214.032 |
102.374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT |
474.687 |
474.687 |
14.729 |
|
|
DEFERREX TAX ASSETS |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS, LOANS & ADVANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
1757.118
|
2027.643
|
1459.856
|
|
|
Sundry Debtors |
452.465
|
446.176
|
247.353
|
|
|
Cash & Bank Balances |
164.093
|
65.926
|
114.725
|
|
|
Other Current Assets |
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
|
|
Loans & Advances |
820.710
|
689.126
|
287.207
|
|
Total
Current Assets |
3194.386
|
3228.871 |
2109.141 |
|
|
Less : CURRENT LIABILITIES & PROVISIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
1417.333
|
1592.269
|
1284.644
|
|
|
Provisions |
499.809
|
675.184
|
321.527
|
|
Total
Current Liabilities |
1917.142
|
2267.453 |
1606.171 |
|
|
Net Current Assets |
1277.244
|
961.418
|
502.970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES |
10.257 |
13.415 |
3.623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
10798.819 |
10258.315 |
9549.637 |
|
PROFIT & LOSS
ACCOUNT
|
PARTICULARS |
31.03.2007 |
31.03.2006 |
31.03.2005 |
|
|
Sales Turnover |
7725.244 |
7328.114 |
6808.307 |
|
|
Other Income |
5.773 |
766.410 |
0.000 |
|
|
Total Income |
7731.017 |
8094.524 |
6808.307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/(Loss) Before Tax |
[131.980] |
994.943 |
482.958 |
|
|
Provision for Taxation |
[2.310] |
198.369 |
19.849 |
|
|
Profit/(Loss) After Tax |
[134.290] |
796.574 |
463.109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export Value
|
142.473 |
95.998 |
58.087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Import Value
|
1474.262 |
776.540 |
666.301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing Expenses |
6877.652 |
7051.709 |
|
|
|
Interest |
411.812 |
496.047 |
|
|
|
Works in progress |
412.054 |
[608.141] |
6325.349 |
|
|
Provision – others |
64.357 |
40.000 |
|
|
|
Depreciation & Amortization |
199.451 |
183.051 |
|
|
Total Expenditure |
7965.326 |
7162.666 |
6325.349 |
|
QUARTERLY RESULTS
|
PARTICULARS |
30.06.2007 |
30.09.2007 |
31.12.2007 |
|
Type
|
1st
Quarter |
2nd
Quarter |
3rd
Quarter |
|
Sales Turnover |
1849.300 |
2039.100 |
2260.600 |
|
Other Income |
4.900 |
3.600 |
26.500 |
|
Total Income |
1854.200 |
2042.700 |
2287.100 |
|
Total Expenditure |
1778.300 |
1838.400 |
2061.900 |
|
Operating Profit |
75.900 |
204.300 |
225.200 |
|
Interest |
132.000 |
125.600 |
140.000 |
|
Gross Profit |
-56.100 |
78.700 |
85.200 |
|
Depreciation |
53.400 |
52.700 |
64.900 |
|
Tax |
2.400 |
14.300 |
5.100 |
|
Reported PAT |
-123.200 |
11.700 |
-27.000 |
KEY RATIOS
|
Year |
31.03.2007 |
31.03.2006 |
31.03.2005 |
|
Debt-Equity Ratio |
0.82 |
1.10 |
2.28 |
|
Long Term Debt-Equity Ratio |
0.56 |
0.83 |
1.62 |
|
Current Ratio |
0.91 |
0.87 |
0.83 |
|
TURNOVER RATIOS |
|||
|
Fixed Assets |
0.81 |
0.77 |
0.66 |
|
Inventory |
4.62 |
4.74 |
5.57 |
|
Debtors |
19.45 |
23.85 |
23.91 |
|
Interest Cover Ratio |
0.68 |
1.45 |
1.59 |
|
Operating Profit Margin(%) |
5.59 |
11.09 |
11.21 |
|
Profit Before Interest And Tax Margin(%) |
3.30 |
8.88 |
8.72 |
|
Cash Profit Margin(%) |
0.75 |
4.15 |
5.72 |
|
Adjusted Net Profit Margin(%) |
-1.54 |
1.93 |
3.24 |
|
Return On Capital Employed(%) |
3.12 |
8.66 |
7.30 |
|
Return On Net Worth(%) |
-2.64 |
3.95 |
8.78 |
LOCAL AGENCY
FURTHER INFORMATION
History:
The
company is a leading player in Indian dry cell batteries market. Incorporated
in 1934 the company was - formerly a subsidiary of Union Carbide Corporation,
US and was subsequently taken over by B M Khaitan and the Williamson Magor
group of companies. The name of the company was changed to EVEREADY INDUSTRIES
LIMITED eleven years after its Bhopal plant was involved in one of the world's
worst industrial disasters.
The
Company manufactures and markets Carbon Zinc Batteries, Rechargeable Batteries,
Alkaline Batteries, Flashlights and Packet Tea. The Company was the first to
introduce batteries in India in 1905. The Company has completed 100 years of
its services and leads the market, in the segment of Dry Cell Batteries and
Flashlights with a market share of 46%. The company is the world's third
largest producer of Carbon Zinc Batteries and selling more than a billion units
a year. The company is the owner of popular drycell brand 'Eveready' and
markets Carbon Zinc Batteries, Rechargeable Batteries, Alkaline Batteries and
full range of brass,aluminum and plastic flashlights under this brandname in
India. The packet tea is marketed under the brand name 'Greendale'.
The
capacity of the company to produce batteries stood at 1350 Million Pcs as on
Mar 31, '05 and 12.5 Million Pieces for flashlights including the expansion
carried out during the fiscal 2004-05. The company entered alkaline batteries segment in 2001-02 by launching
alkaline batteries under its own umberlla brand 'Eveready'. But before that in
1995 the company through Energizer India Private Limited, a 50:50 JV between
EIL and Ralston Purina Overseas Battery Company of US, manufactures reowned
Energizer brand of alkaline batteries in India. In 1995, a MoU was signed with
Gold Peak Industries, Hong Kong, to develop rechargeable Ni-Cd and Ni-Mg
batteries in India. The company has already commenced marketing miniature watch
batteries. During 1999-2000, the company commissioned a new poly sleeve
jacketed battery line at Camperdown Works at Calcutta.
EIL
battery plant and metal processing plant at Calcutta, as well as the
electrolytic manganese dioxide plant at Bombay have received the ISO 9002
certification.
Since
1996-97 the company under goes series of mergers and demergers. In 1996-97,
McLeod Russel India (MRIL) and Faith Investments were amalgamated with the
company. The business of MRIL is being carried on by the company as its tea
division in the trading name of Mcleod Russel. Later Bishnauth Tea Company was
amalgamated with Eveready Industries India Limited And recently the company
demerged its Bulk Tea division to McLeod Russel India Limited (formely Eveready
Company India Limited, a Company floated to facilitate demerger) effective
April 1, 2004.
The
company has decided to set up a factory in Uttaranchal for the manufacture of
dry cell batteries with a capacity of 400.000 Millions pieces per annum at an
estimated investment of Rs.600.000 Millions .The project is envisaged to be
implemented before September 2006.
The
company has shifted its entire manufacturing facilities at Guindy, Chennai to
its another existing unit at Chennai on Tiruvottiyur High Road. The integrated
plant will have a capacity of upto 450 Million batteries per annum. As a result
of this shifting, 8.39 acres of prime land at Guindy will be released and the
company has entered into an agreement with Khivraj TechPark Limited of Chennai
for development of this site as a building complex particularly suitable for
the Information Technology Sector, having a Information Technology sector,
having a built-up area in excess of 10,00,000 Sq.ft. and build at a cost of the
developer company Khivraj Techpark but towards consideration for the land the
copany will in return gets an upfront payment of Rs.250.000 Millions and 20% of
the built-up area together with proportionate car parking spaces. Williamson
Magor and Co Limited was ceased to be associate from 10th January 2005.
Fixed assets
v Goodwill
v Estate and development
v Land freehold
v Patents/trade marks
v Land leasehold
v Buildings
v Plant
v Machinery
v Equipments
v Motor and other vehicles
v Furniture
v Fixtures
v Office appliances
The company is
in trade terms with :
OPERATIONAL REVIEW:-
Net sales for the year were higher by 5.4% over the previous financial year. However, Profit before Depreciation, Interest and Taxation (PBDIT) was lower at Rs.479.200 millions as compared to Rs.1674.000 millions in the previous year. Ignoring extra-ordinary income, PBDIT from operations stood at Rs.473.400 millions against Rs.907.600 millions in the previous year.
The lower PBDIT from operations was contributed by a very
steep and unprecedented increase in raw material prices and lower volumes due
to consumer resistance to price increases necessitated by the cost push.
Batteries and
Flashlights:
The operational performance of the Company during the year in review was marked by continuing steep and unprecedented increase in raw material costs - mainly that of zinc - which the Company uses in significant quantity in the manufacture of batteries and also brass flashlights.
This cost push not only put pressure on margins but also necessitated taking
price increase actions to mitigate the impact. The series of these pricing
actions met with stiff resistance from the consumers. This manifested itself in
consumers lowering or deferring consumption, which resulted in lower sales
volumes. The combined impact of cost push and lower volumes resulted in poor
financial results.
The Company believes that the phenomenon as explained above is only a temporary
one caused by assignable reasons beyond its control. The pillars behind the
Company's sustained good performance over time continue to be its fundamental
strengths on distinct quality edge, penetrative distribution and effective
marketing. These strength areas will eventually take the Company to a path of
sustainable growth and accordingly these were persisted with during the year
under review.
The Company met the schedule of construction of its new state-of-the-art plant
at Haridwar during the year under review and it eventually commenced commercial
production on April 2, 2007 - as per plan. The plant will not only augment
battery capacity by 360 million units, but also expand margins due to excise
and tax benefits available to it.
The manufacturing operations of the Company continued to focus on total quality
management, safety, energy conservation and cost control. This helped the
Company in achieving manufacturing excellence.
Green Star Quality Circle of Hyderabad unit won the excellence award in the
'20th National Convention of Quality Circles', held at IIT Kanpur.
As mentioned in the last Report for the year ended, March 31, 2006, the EMD
manufacturing operations at Thane, Maharashtra had become completely
un-remunerative on account of higher quality imported EMD being available in
the market for battery manufacturing at costs lower than the said EMD
manufacturing costs. Accordingly, the EMD operations had been suspended and as
a measure of cost protection, since the same was uneconomical and unviable,
actions were put in place by which the manufacturing facilities was totally
closed from the close of March 31, 2007.
Packet Tea:
The packet tea business of the Company continued to leverage the wide and deep national distribution reach. The business had a value growth of 17%, which was contributed by a very healthy volume growth of 9%. The market continues to be severely competitive. However, the Company remains focused on this business as a driver for revenue growth.
Insect Repellents:
During the year under review, the Company diversified its product portfolio in to a new product range, viz., insect repellents. This is in line with the Company's plans to grow organically in newer FMCG products using its distribution chain. Mosquito coils are the first products in the repellents range of products.
The criterion applied for the selection of this product range included the
large size of the insect repellent market - given India's perennial problems
with mosquito and attendant diseases. Large-scale usage of coils in the rural
mass market also was of particular interest, where the Company's distribution
network is extremely strong. The launch of the product took place close to the
beginning of the year under review and this was the first year of operation.
Initial response to the launch was encouraging and this segment will offer
handsome revenue growth and profitability for the Company in future.
Prospects:
Financially, the year under review was a disappointing one. The immediate
targets for the Company are a swift revival and thereafter create a path for
sustainable growth. This seems quite within realms of feasibility for a number
of reasons:
The buoyant India economy will sustain consumerism growth, which will benefit the FMCG segment. The Company will take advantage of this growth.
It is firmly believed that there has not been any change in the basic
fundamentals of the market. The demand drivers and the potential offered by the
presently low-consuming Indian market will continue to offer major potential
for growth.
After the consumer's initial difficulty in adjusting to the new high cost
regime, the market will gradually come back to the consumption levels.
Input costs will continue to put pressure - at least in the short to medium
term. However, the Company having already taken adequate pricing measures and
its metal cost hedging mechanisms will ensure perhaps only an insignificant
impact.
The Company's bouquet of products is uniquely positioned to address consumer
needs at the base of the hierarchy of needs. New people coming to consumerism
will easily take to these products.
Management Discussion
and Analysis:
The Business:
The company is one of India's most renowned and enduring FMCG companies, with the operations entrenched in the country for over 100 years. Over the decades, it has strengthened its position as the dry cell battery and flashlight industry market leader in the second most populous country in the world.
The Company's contemporary product portfolio comprises the following:
· Dry cell batteries, flashlights and rechargeable batteries under brand 'Eveready.
· Packet tea under brands Tez', 'Jaago', 'Premium Gold', 'Classic'.
· Insect repellents under brand 'Eveready Poweron'.
The Indian operations started through import of dry cell batteries and then
marketing the same across major Indian cities. This eventually led to setting
up manufacturing facilities and a distribution network across India.
Subsequently, this manufacturing presence was integrated forward into the
manufacture of flashlights, the largest consumer of batteries.
Over time, the Company evolved into the largest dry cell battery player in
India with a market share of 45.6 per cent and virtually the only flashlights
player in the market.
The Company possesses one of the widest and deepest distribution networks among
FMCG companies in India, reflected in its premium brand equity and customer
loyalty. To leverage the growth of this pan-national distribution pipeline, the
Company extended its product category to the marketing of packet tea and insect
repellents. The Company's existing share of packet tea market is limited.
However, the Company expects that quality level of its product and its strength
of retail penetration will eventually translate into a significant market share
over the foreseeable future. Mosquito coils were launched by the Company close
to the beginning of the year under review The first year of operation was
encouraging and the Company expects to garner significant share in this market
within a reasonable time frame based on its rural reach and tangible
differentiation from other products available in the market. Given the buoyant
Indian economy robust product outlook and a proactive management, Subject expects to strengthen its presence across
these products through increasing value and volumes.
India Economic Overview:
The off-take of the Company's products is influenced by the health of the Indian economy. According to the Economic Survey 2006-07, the country's economy was estimated to have grown at a healthy 9.2 per cent during the year under review.
The country took rising input material costs of non-ferrous
metal, petroleum etc. in its stride and key sectors like infrastructure, steel
and cement grew at a healthy trot. But for the agriculture sector, which grew
at a modest 2.7 per cent, the overall economy would have turned out even better
results. This healthy growth in the economy led to higher income levels and
consequently growing consumerism. The FMCG sector is set to take full advantage
of this.
FMCG Industry In India:
The past proved to be challenging for India's FMCG sector on account of volatility in agricultural incomes, increased competition, price discounts and the growing affordability of lifestyles and durable products. This led to concerns on retaining the share of consumer wallet for FMCG goods.
However, this trend has significantly changed during recent times, with many
FMCG categories showing healthy growth. The sectoral outlook continues to be
positive mainly on account of the projected increase in per capita income. It
is now firmly believed that the positive factors of the economy is finally
having its impact on per capita consumption pattern. All parameters seem to
indicate that this trend is sustainable over the coming years.
Batteries:
Industry size and structure:
The Indian market for dry cell batteries is estimated at 2.5 billion pieces by volume and Rs.15 billion by value. The battery market has only a few players. Out of which Subject has a market share of 45.6 per cent, and the next player lags by more than 17 per cent points. During the year under review however, the market had the adverse impact of a very aggressive rise of the input material costs, particularly that of zinc.
These adverse impacts had to be passed on to the consumer. A significant part of the dry battery market is in the rural and poorer segments of the economy which are resistant to stiff price increases. The consumers reacted adversely to these price increases and resorted to reducing or deferring consumption. This resulted in a market de-growth of about 8 per cent in battery volumes during the year. This phenomenon was most significant in the 'D' size battery segment, which had to bear the highest impact of the cost push. These batteries are predominantly used in the price-resistant rural sections of the society and saw the largest quantum of volume drop. 'D' segment de-grew by nearly 21 per cent. On the other hand, the 'AA' batteries which are more in use in the urban areas and historically the growth champion had a positive growth of 9 per cent. Handsome growth exceeding 20 per cent was seen in the newly emerging 'AAA' segment - however it has to be seen in the perspective of this growth coming off a smaller base.
As stated before, the growth rates for the year under review should be taken to
reflect temporary consumer sentiment and is not seen to have any permanent
impact.
The segment pattern within the industry underwent change on account of the
relative growth phenomenon as explained above. The share of 'D' size batteries
reduced to 44 per cent and the 'AA' size batteries increased towards the 50 per
cent mark. The split of technology within the dry batteries market also
remained constant with zinc carbon batteries virtually possessing the entire
market with 99 per cent share. The alkaline batteries have minimal share of the
market at 0.5 per cent and are present in only some premium urban outlets.
Rechargeable batteries, which have the balance 0.5 per cent of the market seems to have made its mark on a loyal customer base but rising slowly.
Off take of batteries is driven largely by growth in the off take of its
applications.
A growing need for portable power and the advent of a number of battery
operated gadgets catalyse consumption. Since these address everyday use,
batteries have enjoyed a non-cyclical demand and have been largely untouched
during the past general downturns. The phenomenon of consumption reducing on
account of large-scale price increases is unique to the year under review and
is expected to be only a temporary one.
Performance review:
Volume in the battery market in India was estimated to have reduced by 8 per cent. Sales volume of Subject also reduced by a similar margin. As a result, the market share pattern remained by and large consistent with the previous year - with Subject remaining at 45.6 per cent.
In the product mix of Subject in the year under review, 'D' size had a share of 47 per cent and 'AA' at 45 per cent. During the year, the 'D' segment degrew by 21 per cent and 'AA' grew 12 per cent.
Marketing and distribution:
The Company continued to put emphasis in strengthening its distribution network. Of the total FMCG universe of 7.3 million outlets, penetration of batteries stocking universe was at 70 per cent. Eveready batteries were stocked in 66 per cent of such outlets, higher than any other battery brand by a wide margin.
Eveready's brand campaign featuring continued to add positive qualities to its
brand value. Subject will persist with
these efforts to further strengthen its brand salience.
Opportunities and threats:
India has a low per capita consumption across a number of product groups, batteries included, indicating a latent potential for sustainable growth.
Since dry cell batteries represent the cheapest source of portable power, consumption is expected to increase over time. Besides, growing income levels, changing lifestyles and an increased convenience have resulted in proliferation of gadgets (remote controls, torches, toys, cameras, FM radio sets and portable music systems) run by batteries.
The Company's 'D' segment is being driven primarily by a need for light
(flashlights) and entertainment (radio) in rural India. The proven durability
and quality assurance of the Company's brand will continue to capitalize on
this long-standing opportunity. Growth in the 'AA' segment will continue to be
fuelled by proliferation of clocks, remote control devices and growth of newer
devices across both rural and urban India. The new 'AAA' segment will take
higher share of the battery market, with introduction of smaller size
devices.
Besides, the introduction of high drain equipment (digital cameras and CD
players) is expected to enhance the demand for more powerful rechargeable
batteries. The Company reinforced its presence in this segment by becoming the
first organized entrant. Subject expects rechargeable to be one of the drivers
of the Company's revenues in the future.
Batteries do not face any serious threat because they are an item of recurring
use, providing portable energy at an affordable cost. Subject is adequately
protected from competition due to its enduring brand equity, tangible quality
and ease of availability due to its deep distribution.
Cheap imports have also not proved to be a threat because of their inherently
poor quality While these low cost products did invite initial use on the basis
of the price differential, their sustained use is unlikely as price and quality
have been proved as directly proportionate.
Alkaline batteries, popular in the West, also do not pose a threat because of
price-sensitive nature of the Indian consumer leading to a mere 0.5 per cent
share of the market despite being present for over 12 years. In any case
Subject has presence in this segment and will be able to participate in any
opportunity the market presents.
Given the overall positive scenario, a tangible threat to battery consumption
lies in making the product unaffordable to poorer segments of the economy as
was evidenced in the year under review (explained more fully in the next
section).
Risks and concerns:
Aggressive raw material price increase represents an area of concern. A key raw material, Zinc, grew by more than 100 per cent during the course of the year under review this of course is a general phenomenon, not limited to the company alone. The Company mitigated the adverse impact by passing this to the market through a series of price increases. Yet, there were timelags between incurring of the increased cost impact and implementation of the price increase. This kept margins under continuous pressure.
The more disturbing side to this phenomenon was the products becoming
unaffordable to large sections of the consuming class due to the above
aforesaid price increases. There was finally stiff resistance to these and
consumers decided to reduce or defer consumption.
There has, however, not been any change in the basic fundamentals of the
business. The demand drivers continue to be the same and the Indian market
continues to offer major potential for growth being a consumer of perhaps the
lowest number of batteries in the world. The current downturn relates to a
severe cost push and consequential price hikes which the consumers were not
able to absorb immediately. It is expected that after the initial difficulty of
adjusting to the new high cost regime, the market will gradually come back to
consumption levels as determined by fundamental demand. Input costs will
continue to put pressure - at least in the short to medium term. However
Subject has already taken adequate
pricing measures and has also resorted to material hedging mechanisms. So the
impact on this account is perhaps not going to be significant.
Apart from the above, the Company has a well documented Risk Management System,
which is reviewed by an active Steering Committee appointed by the Board of
Directors. The risk registrar does identify a few risks, which are purely
routine in nature and none of any significant impact. There is a mitigation
system in place which addresses these risks as part of routine management
process.
Flashlights:
The flashlight market is determined by Subject because it is virtually the only organized player in the
market.
The segments in the flashlights market were traditionally determined by the
material used for manufacturing the flashlight viz., Brass, Plastic, and
Aluminum.
Historically the 'brass' segment was the most popular among consumers
-especially in the rural areas. However, during the year under review prices of
brass flashlights had to be increased manifold on account of the cost push of
the underlying base metals - zinc and copper. This was thoroughly resisted by
the consumers and brass flashlights volume de-grew by a significant 39 per
cent. Also, aggravated by the price increases in batteries, the entire
flashlights market de-grew by more than 20 per cent.
As a mitigation measure and with a view to giving consumers a cheaper option,
the year under review saw the advent of a new segment which became determined
by the type of light source used. This new segment has popularly come to be
known as the 'LED' segment due to usage of LED bulbs being used as the light
source. Subject has been at the
forefront of introduction of this new segment and has encouraged consumers to
take to it due to the advantage of lower battery consumption in these
flashlights.
While 'LED' flashlights do not fully meet all functionalities of the
traditional flashlights, this new segment has been taken on enthusiastically by
the extremely price conscious segment of consumers and Subject believes that offering products right across
the span will grow user-ship and will also provide boost to battery
demand.
As mentioned earlier, the industry is dominated by Subject . There are a few
marginal players, none of whom have any significant position and no new trend
seems to be emerging in this respect.
Performance review:
During 2006-07, Subject had revenue de-growth of nearly 21 per cent. This was mostly contributed by the volume de-growth across the segments - most pronounced in the 'brass' segment. As already explained in the previous section, this is attributed to consumer's reaction to the steep price increases of flashlights and also that of batteries which power the same.
The price increases were unavoidable due to very steep cost increase of zinc and copper.
Opportunities and
threats:
Moving beyond the temporary setback of the year under review - caused by assignable reasons beyond control - India's flashlights industry is expected to grow at a steady pace across all its segments. However, a vast dormant population (almost 45 Million rural households) of non-users represents a large flashlights opportunity, which the Company expects to convert into users over the foreseeable future.
Risks and concerns:
Rising metal prices of zinc and copper continue to be an area of concern in the manufacture of brass flashlights. The problem is not only in suffering a squeeze on margins, but also getting lower demand in reaction to price increases. Prices of popular brass torches went up steeply during the year and consumption came down significantly. Given that nearly all of brass torch consumption comes from he price-sensitive rural segment, this remains a concern.
As a mitigation measure, the new generation 'LED' flashlights have been
introduced for the price-sensitive consumers. The initial reaction has been
encouraging and it is expected to fill the void left by de-growth of the
'brass' segment till the market restores its equilibrium.
Packet Tea:
Tea is the staple Indian beverage, sold either in loose, unbranded or packaged branded forms. In India, consumption is hugely skewed towards loose tea with a 60 per cent market share. India's packet tea industry is fragmented with a few large players occupying a significant share and several localized players accounting for regional competition.
Subject is leveraging its distribution
pipeline to market this product and thus growing additional revenues on
virtually no additional costs. Subject
has not really put any advertising money behind the four brands viz.
Tez, Jaago, Premium Gold and Classic, which are positioned for different
consumer segments. Yet these brands have gradually grown in consumer acceptance
due to a tangible differentiation in quality, which has been a hallmark of
Subject 's packet tea branding strategy.
Given the industry's potential, fragmented nature and limited number of
national players, Subject is confident
that it will soon emerge as one of the larger Indian players in this category
Besides, the Company is confident that its superior quality at a competitive price
will accelerate demand, strengthen its presence in potentially attractive
markets and emerge as a significant revenue driver.
Subject has been growing this business
at fairly brisk pace - though from a small base. It had value and volume growth
of 17 and 9 per cent respectively in the year under review.
Insect Repellents:
The market for insect repellents is significantly large in India, which has a perennial problem in a large mosquito population and the serious diseases that mosquitoes inflict on mankind. The repellent market is primarily divided into the following segments:
· Coils
· Vaporizers
· Skin cream
Coils seemed immediately attractive because it is more used in the rural
sectors, where Subject 's distribution set up is particularly strong.
Subject has thus started this
diversification effort with coils and is now ready to enter the vaporizer
market and perhaps later the niche skin cream segment.
The coils market is dominated by a few dominant players. Given the overwhelming
dependence of these players on the wholesale channel, Subject is confident that it will be able to break
into the market successfully through its direct penetration in the rural
areas.
The coils market is unique in the sense that all the large players routinely
outsource their products and there is really not much tangible differentiation
across the products offered by the various companies. The larger players have
been successful in establishing their franchise essentially through brand
spending. While Subject also is
outsourcing the product, it is confident of gaining consumer acceptance through
consciously thought-out product differentiation values.
The business was launched close to the beginning of the year under review.
The reaction has been quite encouraging, but it is too early to comment on its
performance. However, Subject is
confident that it is in a position to emerge as one of the larger players in
this product category.
Information Technology: Subject has
traditionally invested in Information Technology (IT) to provide effective
business solutions amenable to informed decision making. The IT process at the
company is one of continuous improvement.
During the year, subject standardized
all its major applications across all locations on the Oracle Business Suite as
an ERP solution. This exercise was not without the usual teething problems.
However, the process seems to have been internalized well in the organization.
Needless to state, the ERP system will bring the expected benefits associated
with it in the forthcoming years.
Outlook:
Financially the year under review was a disappointing one. The immediate
targets for the Company are a swift revival and thereafter create a path for
sustainable growth. This seems quite within realms of feasibility for a number
of reasons:
The buoyant India economy will sustain consumerism growth, which will benefit
the FMCG segment subject will take
advantage of this growth.
It is firmly believed that there has not been any change in the basic fundamentals of the market. The demand drivers and the potential offered by the presently low-consuming Indian market will continue to offer major potential for growth.
After the consumer's initial difficulty in adjusting to the new high cost
regime, the market will gradually come back to the consumption levels.
Input costs will continue to put pressure - at least in the short to medium
term. However, subject having already
taken adequate pricing measures and its metal cost hedging mechanisms will
ensure perhaps only an insignificant impact.
subject 's bouquet of products is uniquely positioned to address consumer needs at the base of the hierarchy of needs. New people coming to consumerism will easily take to these products.
The new plant at Haridwar will expand margins due to excise duty benefits and
will render higher net profitability on account of income tax being free.
subject 's efforts in diversifying in to new products will add scale and
profitability. To this effect the Company entered into an Agreement with
Phoenix Lamps Limited . for sales and distribution of the latter's General
Lighting Lamps (GLLs) excluding automotive applications under the brands of
'Halonix' from Phoenix and 'Eveready'.
OTHER INFORMATION:
The company has
been accredited with ISO 9002 Certification.
Trial proceedings
before the Crv^f Judicial Magistrate, Bhopal, on the modified charges framed
under the directions of the Supreme Court that commenced in September 1997, are
yet to be concluded. As per advice of legal counsel, allegations against
the Company are without any firm basis and the possibility of proceeding
against the Company succeeding is extremely remote. Since the charges are very
likely to fail, no provision is necessary at this stage.
Based on valuation
made by Professional Valuers, Brand 'Eveready' was valued at Rs. 6600.000
millions and was taken into books in 2004-2005.
Expert opinion was
received whereby the working life of brand 'Eveready' was estimated at more
than 100 years. However, as a measure of prudence the amortization period of
the brand has been kt pt at 40 years only.
'Brand' included
as Intangibles in Fixed Assets (Schedule 5) includes purchased brand [Gross
Block Rs. 160.000 millions (31.03.2006 - Rs. 160.000 millions), Net Block Rs.
112.000 millions (31.03.06 - Rs.128.000 millions)].
Contingent
Liabilities
Claims against the
Corij any not acknowledged as debts :
- Excise- Rs.
119.740 millions net of tax, Rs. 79.458 millions (31.03.06- Rs. 91.066 millions
net of tax, Rs. 60.414 millions)
- Sales Tax - Rs.
6C " 0 Lakhs net of tax. Rs. 4.027 millions (31.03.06 - Rs. 1.227 millions
net of tax, Rs. 0.814 millions)
Income Tax :
• The Departrre it
is in appeal in regard to matters decided in favour of the Company, the tax
effect whereof is Rs. 7.205 millions (31.03.06 - Rs. 7.205 millions).
• The Company s in
appeal in regard to assessment made the tax effect whereof Rs. 59.970 millions,
(31.03.06 - Rs. 59.970 millions).
• In respect of
matters relating to erstwhile The Bishnauth Tea Company Limited . (BTCL)
(amalgamated with the Company effective 1st April, 2000), Rs. 12.548 millions
is (31.03.06-Rs. 12.548 millions).
Based on
professional advice, the Company is of the view that the provisions made for
taxation are adequate and no further provision is needed.
Others-Rs. 19.139
millions net of tax, Rs. 12.697 millions (31.03.06 - Rs. 18.986 millions net of
tax, Rs. 12.595 millions).
Bank guarantees
Rs. 1.178 millions (31.03.06 - Rs. 22.203 millions).
The Company has
given guarantees aggregating to Rs. 232.900 millions (31.03.06 - Rs. 229.900
millions) to financial institutions, banks and others on behalf of its
subsidiary and another company. The amount outstanding against these guarantees
as on 31.03.07 is Rs. 136.431 millions (31.03.06 - Rs. 144.597 millions).
Estimated amount
of contracts remaining to be executed on Capital Account and not provided for
Rs. 22.098 millions (31.03.06 - Rs. 4.716 millions).
WEBSITE DETAILS:
The company
is one of India’s most reputed FMCG companies.
The company has a portfolio comprising dry cell batteries
(carbon zinc batteries, rechargeable batteries and alkaline batteries),
flashlights (torches) and packet tea. It has recently forayed into the mosquito
repellant industry under the brand name, ‘Poweron’.
The company
is India’s largest selling brand of dry cell batteries and flashlights
(torches), with dominant market shares of about 46% and 85% respectively.
Subject is
the world’s third largest producer of carbon zinc batteries, selling more than
a billion units a year. Its carbon zinc batteries dominate the Indian market
with a complete range for all equipment types.
The turnover in the financial year 2005-06 for the company. was approx. US $ 176
million.
The Eveready
brand is synonymous with power, with a durable franchise that has spanned over
a century.
Subject is celebrating its centenary year in India in
2005.
The new tagline “The Next Century of Power” affirms Eveready’s commitment to being
technology leaders well into the future, evolving with consumers to meet their
changing needs.
From small beginnings with an import consignment in 1905 of
Rs 500, the company today
dominates the Indian market and stands for portable power and light to millions
of consumers.
As a brand, the War cry promises empowerment to young
consumers in urban India.
The iconic symbol similarly stands for the assurance of
power to rural consumers.
The Company’s
packet tea business is also a fast-growing business and poised for greater
gains in market share.
Management Team :-
Chairman
(Non-Executive)
Mr. B.M. Khaitan
Eminent industrialist with more
than 50 years of experience. Heads the Williamson Magor group of Companies.
Entrepreneur of national repute.
Executive
Personnel
Executive Vice
Chairman and Managing Director
Mr. Deepak Khaitan
Chief Executive
Officer of the Company
MBA from IMI, Geneva
Over 28 years of experience in steering diverse business enterprises in India
Whole time
Directors
Suvamoy Saha
In charge of
Finance, I T, Corporate Communications and New Business initiatives
B.Com (Hons.), A.C.A
Over 23 years of experience in corporate management in diverse fields
Non-Executive
Personnel
Aditya Khaitan
Industrialist with
expertise in steering diverse businesses.
Experience in Corporate Finance and Management of tea and Engineering
industries
Bhaskar
Mitter
Barrister-at-law
(London)
Eminent professional with 60 years of experience.
Former Chairman of Andrew Yule group, CESC Ltd, BOC Ltd.
Has held positions as president of Bengal Chamber of Commerce & Industry
and Associated Chamber of Commerce & Industry
Diwan
Arun Nanda
MBA from IIM Ahmedabad
Eminent advertising and marketing professional with 38 years of experience
Been an entrepreneur who founded Redifussion India
P H
Ravikumar
Eminent banking
professional with 32 years of experience
Has held senior positions in Bank of India and ICICI Bank.
Currently, the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of National
Commodity and Derivatives Exchange Ltd
Sanjiv
Goenka
Vice Chairman of
RPG Enterprises
Chairman of Board of Directors of IIT, Kharagpur.
Has been the youngest member of Confederation of Indian Industry and Indian
Chamber of Commerce
Vimal
Bhandari
Chartered
Accountant.
Country Head for AEGON International N.V, the large Dutch life insurance, asset
management and pension Company.
Has several years experience in corporate finance, investment banking, project
finance and asset management,
Was Executive Director of Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Ltd
and is on the Board of various Companies.
Mr. S. R. Dasgupta
Area Chairman for Eveready Battery Company for all Asia and Africa
operations (1998-99),
Vice-President/Managing Director of Eveready Singapore Pte. Ltd. (1996-98)
and President Director - PT Eveready Company Indonesia, Jakarta (1986-95)
CMT REPORT
(Corruption, Money Laundering & Terrorism]
The Public Notice information has been collected from various sources
including but not limited to: The Courts, India Prisons Service,
Interpol, etc.
1] INFORMATION ON
DESIGNATED PARTY
No exist designating subject or any of its beneficial owners,
controlling shareholders or senior officers as terrorist or terrorist
organization or whom notice had been received that all financial transactions
involving their assets have been blocked or convicted, found guilty or against
whom a judgement or order had been entered in a proceedings for violating
money-laundering, anti-corruption or bribery or international economic or
anti-terrorism sanction laws or whose assets were seized, blocked, frozen or
ordered forfeited for violation of money laundering or international
anti-terrorism laws.
2] Court Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that subject is
or was the subject of any formal or informal allegations, prosecutions or other
official proceeding for making any prohibited payments or other improper
payments to government officials for engaging in prohibited transactions or
with designated parties.
3] Asset Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that the property or assets of the subject
are derived from criminal conduct or a prohibited transaction.
4] Record on Financial
Crime :
Charges or conviction
registered against subject: None
5] Records on Violation of
Anti-Corruption Laws :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
6] Records on Int’l
Anti-Money Laundering Laws/Standards :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
7] Criminal Records
No
available information exist that suggest that subject or any of its principals
have been formally charged or convicted by a competent governmental authority
for any financial crime or under any formal investigation by a competent
government authority for any violation of anti-corruption laws or international
anti-money laundering laws or standard.
8] Affiliation with
Government :
No record
exists to suggest that any director or indirect owners, controlling
shareholders, director, officer or employee of the company is a government
official or a family member or close business associate of a Government official.
9] Compensation Package :
Our market
survey revealed that the amount of compensation sought by the subject is fair
and reasonable and comparable to compensation paid to others for similar
services.
10] Press Report :
No press reports / filings exists on
the subject.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
MIRA INFORM as part of its Due Diligence do provide comments on
Corporate Governance to identify management and governance. These factors often
have been predictive and in some cases have created vulnerabilities to credit
deterioration.
Our Governance Assessment focuses principally on the interactions
between a company’s management, its Board of Directors, Shareholders and other
financial stakeholders.
CONTRAVENTION
Subject is not known to have contravened any existing local laws,
regulations or policies that prohibit, restrict or otherwise affect the terms
and conditions that could be included in the agreement with the subject.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.40.62 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.81.29 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.64.09 |
SCORE & RATING
EXPLANATIONS
|
SCORE FACTORS |
RANGE |
POINTS |
|
HISTORY |
1~10 |
9 |
|
PAID-UP CAPITAL |
1~10 |
9 |
|
OPERATING SCALE |
1~10 |
9 |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION |
|
|
|
--BUSINESS SCALE |
1~10 |
10 |
|
--PROFITABILIRY |
1~10 |
8 |
|
--LIQUIDITY |
1~10 |
9 |
|
--LEVERAGE |
1~10 |
9 |
|
--RESERVES |
1~10 |
9 |
|
--CREDIT LINES |
1~10 |
9 |
|
--MARGINS |
-5~5 |
--- |
|
DEMERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--BANK CHARGES |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--LITIGATION |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--OTHER ADVERSE INFORMATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
MERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--SOLE DISTRIBUTORSHIP |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--EXPORT ACTIVITIES |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--AFFILIATION |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--LISTED |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--OTHER MERIT FACTORS |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
TOTAL |
|
81 |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
RATING
EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors carry similar weight in credit
consideration. Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems
comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
NR |
In view of the lack of information, we have no basis upon which to
recommend credit dealings |
No Rating |
|