![]()
|
Report Date : |
14.05.2008 |
IDENTIFICATION
DETAILS
|
Name : |
TANZANIA INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL SERVICES
LTD |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
P.o Box 71442 Dar Es Salaam |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Tanzania |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
5.5.2000 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Limited Liability Company, Limited by Shares |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Operation of Container Terminal in Dare S Salaam |
RATING &
COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Maximum Credit Limit : |
USD 400,000 |
|
|
|
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
No Complaints |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
TANZANIA INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL SERVICES LTD
P.o Box 71442 Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
Telephone: +255-22-2134056
Fax: +255-22-2134019
Email: ticts@ticts.com
Internet: www.ticts.com
5/5/ 2000
No. Tanzania
Limited Liability
Company, Limited by shares
Not Listed
2007
400
Head offices Port Access Road, Port of Dar Es Salaam,
Tanzania
Branches None
Paid in Capital TZS. 100,000,000
Subscribed Capital TZS. 100,000,000
Name Position Amount
Ratio
Mr. Jan T. Mors CEO
Mr. David Cotty Director
Mr. S E Luhigo Director
Hutchinson Port
holding Holding Co. 75.00%
Vertex Financial
Services Shareholders 25.00%
Total 100.00%
Our proposed credit amount of USD 400,000 is recommendable
Company (1) KURASINI INLAND
CONTAINER DEPOT
President/ CEO (1)
Name Mr. Jan T. Mors
Remarks Top
Decision Maker
President/ CEO (2)
Name Mr.
David Cotty
Operation of
container terminal in dare s salaam
Buying
terms 30% in cash, 70% on credit
Selling terms 50% in cash, 50% on credit
Gorbel,
Kalmar, GoldHorse
Clearing agents, Importers
& exporters
TZS.
268,000,000 (2007)
Worldwide
50.0%
50.0%
80.0%
Main Banks CRDB Bank
Payment Morale: In the documents at our
disposal nothing adverse has been shown so far.
CREDIT RATING: Financial situation is
average.
Maximum credit we recommend is USD 400,000 outstanding at any one time.
RATING
EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors carry similar weight in credit
consideration. Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems
comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
NR |
In view of the lack of information, we have no basis upon which to
recommend credit dealings |
No Rating |
|
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)