![]()
|
Report Date : |
06.09.2008 |
IDENTIFICATION
DETAILS
|
Name : |
NATIONAL HIGHWAY
AUTHORITY |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
27-Mauve Area, Sector G-9/1
PO Box No 1205 Islamabad |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Pakistan |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
1991 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Government Owned Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Construction, Maintenance, Improvement and Operation of National
Highways and Motorways Network of Pakistan |
RATING &
COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
A |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
Status : |
Good |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
No Complaints |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NATIONAL HIGHWAY
AUTHORITY
|
CONTROLLING
MINISTRY |
- |
Ministry
for Communications |
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING OFFICER |
- |
Secretary,
Ministry of Communications |
|
HEADED
BY |
- |
Chairman
NHA |
|
ESTABLISHED
IN |
- |
1991 |
|
MAJOR
ACTIVITIES |
- |
Construction,
Maintenance, Improvement and Operation of National Highways and Motorways Network
of Pakistan |
|
CORE
WINGS |
- |
Planning, Operations, Finance and Administration |
|
HEAD
OFFICE |
- |
27-Mauve Area,
Sector G-9/1 PO Box No 1205
Islamabad – Pakistan. |
|
E MAIL |
- |
|
|
CONTACT |
- |
92 (51)
9261129 to 37, 9260565 |
|
FAX |
- |
92 (51)
9260419 |
|
REGULAR
STRENGTH |
- |
1410
(Headquarters & Regions) |
|
PSDP
ALLOCATION FY 2000-01 |
- |
Rs
15.00 Billion LC Rs 13172.750 Million FC Rs 1827.250 Million |
|
Punjab |
- |
33 Queens Road, Queen Center Near Mozang
Chungi, Lahore Tele : 92 (42) 7572904 Fax : 92 (42) 7572908 |
|
Sindh |
- |
Bungalow No C-17 KDA Scheme No 1,
Karachi Tele : 92 (21) 4533413 Fax : 92
(21) 4554567 |
|
NWFP |
- |
No 5, Qafila Road Defence Officers
Colony, Peshawar Tele : 92 (91) 2916966 Fax : 92 (91) 2916965 |
|
Baluchistan |
- |
54 – B, Chaman Housing Scheme Airport Road,
Quetta Tele : 92 (81) 9201747 Fax : 92 (81) 9201715 |
NHA is undertaking construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of a large number of roads and bridges projects across the country. The names of some of the important projects are mentioned below: –
Karachi Northern
Bypass (57 KMs)
Lyari Expressway
(16.5 KMs)
It would be a 2+2 lane access controlled Dual Carriageway at an approx
cost of Rs 5,081 Million and will help reduce the travel time from Kemari to
Super Highway to maximum 20 – 30 minutes only.
National Highway
Improvement Programme (NHIP)
The programme includes rehabilitation / resurfacing of 2800 KMs of those
Sections of the Highway network, which have a high rate of return, within the
next seven years.
Estimated cost of NHIP is about Rs 32 Billion including World Bank
assistance of US$ 125 Million.
Two studies for the preparation of tender documents and social
environmental assessment (SEA) study are being carried out under NHIP. The
study will recommend measures to bring down the vehicle operating cost
attributable to bad roads.
Peshawar–Torkham
Expressway (45 KMs)
NHA is presently examining two options namely rehabilitation of the
existing road or construction of road on a new alignment, keeping in view the
rebuild of Afghanistan.
Rehabilitation of the existing road will cost over a Billion plus, but
due to certain area and terrain constraints, the existing road cannot be
improved to the international standards.
Construction of a new road with 4–lane bridges and 2–lane highway will
cost about Rs 2.0 Billion. NHA has already completed the design for a new
4–lane Expressway.
Government of Japan has expressed interest in financing this project
through grant.
Gwadar–Khuzdar
Highway (648 KMs)
This important road is to link Gwadar Port with upper Sindh and NWFP.
Provision of this road will maximize the utility of Gwadar Port and will also
help connect this port with Kotri-Shikarpur-DG Khan-DI Khan-Kohat-Peshawar (IH)
at Ratodero.
Rawalpindi–Kohat–Tal–Parachinar
(Road)
This is another important road link leading to
Afghanistan and needs attention for its improvement. This item has been covered
with the description of Kohat Tunnel project also.
|
Name |
Designation |
|
Mr. Muhammad Shamim Siddiqui Engr Muhammad Shahid Jamil Qureshi Mr. Tariq Mahmood Major. Gen. Farrukh Javed Mr. Ijaz Ahmed Choudary Mr. Amjad Virk Mr. Aziz –ul-Haq Mirza Mr. Raja Nowsherwan Brig. Imtiaz Hussain Mr. S.A. Latif Col(R) Muhammad Safiullah Mr. Sabir Hasan Mr. Abdul Rauf Chaudry Mr. Qurban Jan Mr. Khushal Khan Mr. Altaf Ahmed Chaudry Mr. Abdul Haq Mr. Aurangzeb Khan |
Minister for
Communication Minister of
State for Communication Secretary
Communication Chairman
National Highway Authority Secretary
(National Highway Authority) Member (Finance) Member (Operation) Member
(Planning) DG
(Administration) General Manager
(MPO) GM (Design) GM (Planning) GM (P & CA) GM (Internal
Auditor) GM (Finance) GM (Punjab) GM (Sindh) GM (Baluchistan) |
Powers &
Duties of NHA
The gist of the powers and duties assigned to NHA by the Government, as
per the provisions of the NHA Act, 1991, revised in 2001, are as follows: -
|
·
|
Advise the Federal Government on matters relating to National Highways and
Strategic Roads. |
|
·
|
Frame a scheme or schemes for matters such as construction, expansion,
operation and development of National Highways and Strategic Roads and
undertake work/incur expenditure on such scheme(s). |
|
·
|
Acquire any land in accordance with legal procedure and obtain and dispose of
moveable and immovable property of interests therein. |
|
·
|
Research and development in the field of Highways. |
|
·
|
Procure plant, machinery, instruments and materials required for its use. |
|
·
|
Enter into and perform all such contracts as it may consider necessary. |
|
·
|
Levy, collect or cause to be collected tolls on National Highways,
Strategic Roads and such other roads as may be entrusted to it and bridges
thereon. |
|
·
|
License facilities on roads under its control on such terms as it deems fit. |
|
·
|
Determine a building line between which and the RoW (Right of Way) it shall not
be lawful without the consent of the Authority to construct or maintain any
structure or make any excavation. |
|
·
|
Cause studies, surveys, experiments and technical researches to be made or
contribute towards the cost of such studies, surveys, experiments or
technical researches made by any other agency. |
|
·
|
Exercise power toward negotiated contracts for projects to be undertaken
through Private Sector Financing Programme. |
|
·
|
Seek and obtain advice and assistance for the preparation and execution of
any plan, programme or project. |
|
·
|
Raise funds (local and foreign) through borrowing, floating of bonds,
sharing or leasing of assets or any other means, from time to time (provided
that a foreign loan shall be negotiated in consultation with the relevant
Ministry of the GOP). |
|
·
|
Perform any other function supplemental, incidental or consequential to the
purposes and functions aforesaid. |
|
·
|
Take over RoW of the roads declared as National Highways with the consent
of the Provinces and approval of the Federal Cabinet and Provinces shall simultaneously
effect the mutation free of cost and without any liability or condition. |
Rahim Yar Khan –
Tando Muhammad Pannah
The project (80 Km) awarded to FWO in January 2000 at a cost of Rs 3500
million. 30% work has been completed.
TMP (Tarinda
Muhammad Pannah)
Tarinda Muhammad Pannah to Bahawalpur (80 Km) is under review. The cost of the contract is Rs 3500 million.
MCH (Makran
Coastal Highway)
Work on Liari-Ormara Section (248 Km) of Makran Coastal Road (653 Km) at
the cost of Rs 5288 million is in full swing.
42 Km road completed while work from 42 to 92 Km is in progress. Work of Gwadar-Pasni section (132 Km) started
on August 17, 2001.
KKH (KARAKORAM
HIGHWAY)
Improvement of KKH (Hasanabdal-Abbottabad-Thakot-Gilgit-Khunjrab) is in
progress. NHA awarded Thakot-Chillas
and Chillas-Kunjrab sections to FWO.
Chillas-Khunjrab section has been completed.
DI Khan – Mughal
Kot Section
Work on 124 Km road of DI Khan – Mughal Kot awarded to FWO at a cost of
Rs 1307 Million. About 35% roadwork
completed.
Dera Allah Yar –
Nuthal
Improvement work on Dera Allah Yar – Nuthal (55 Km) at the cost of Rs
654 Million is in progress. About 6% roadwork completed. The construction/replacement
of existing steel bridges at 1 Bachani, 2 Pir Punja, 3 Bolan, 4 Dozan, & 5
Kolpur awarded for an amount of Rs 75 Million.
Other Projects
NHIP
- Summary of Financing Plan for Years 2001-2008 (funded from World Bank + GOP +
Toll Receipt)

Financial
Resources of NHA
The financial resources of NHA can be broadly classified under the following
heads: -
a. Cash
Development Loans (CDL)
b.
Grants- in- Aid
c.
Revenue Receipts
d.
Other Receipts
All the funds received (CDL, grants, revenues, etc) form part of a
non-lapsable NHA Fund authorized under Section-21 of NHA Act, 1991. Separate distinct
accounts are maintained at Bank for the purpose of financial control.
Cash Development
Loans (CDL)
These are allocated by the GOP (Finance Division) through PSDP (Public
Sector Development Programme) after consideration by Finance and Planning Divisions.
Over the years, NHA received (as on June 30, 2001) an aggregate of Rs 97.626
billion in local currency (LC) and Rs. 19.759 billion in foreign exchange (FE).
Besides, NHA also utilized direct foreign loans guaranteed by GOP for
Motorways-I (Islamabad – Peshawar) and II (Lahore-Islamabad) from Turkish Exim
bank and Daewoo amounting to US$ 58.259 million and 676 million
respectively.
Grants –in- Aid
Grants to NHA, received from Ministry of
Communications (MOC), are of two types.
These are meant for: -
a. Maintenance of National Highways
b. Establishment Charges
Grant for
Maintenance of Highways
Starting from FY 1990-91, the amount of actual receipts was only Rs 281.595 million as against the
demand of Rs 600.000 million i.e. 53% less than the actual requirement. The
phenomenon of extremely reduced allocation not only continued to persist but
worsened year after year. Resultantly, NHA could get only 16% of the demanded
funds in FY 2000-01 viz Rs 482 million was actually received against the demand
of Rs 3000 million.
Grant for Establishment Charges
Expenditure on 252 core posts of NHA is met out of this grant. Each
year, detailed working of the demand is submitted to MOC. However, like maintenance,
the demand is never fully catered for. During FY 1990-91, NHA could receive a
sum of Rs 5.683 million against the demand of Rs 7.647 million. This pattern of demand versus receipts
continued over ten year’s period i.e. upto 2000-01 in which NHA received Rs
21.699 million against a demand of Rs 28.541 million (24% less than the
demand).
Revenue receipts
collected by NHA are of following types:-
The Public Sector Development Funds cannot fully meet the requirements
of NHA to undertake its mandate effectively, particularly in relation to
maintenance of valuable assets of national highways. Generations of own
resources have, therefore, become vital for continuation of the maintenance and
rehabilitation programme for all roads needing repairs and up gradation.
Revenue collection activities, therefore, commenced with effect from July 1,
1992 but these could not attain a significant volume until FY 1999-2000. The following table shows comparison of
revenue collections prior to 1999-2000 and thereafter on gross basis: -
|
Period |
(Rs in Million) |
|
1-7-1992 to 30-6-1999 |
1097.829 |
|
1-7-1999 to 30-6-2000 |
1296.112 |
|
1-7-2000 to 30-6-2001 |
2070.385 |
|
Total:
|
4464.326 |
It may be seen that out of total collection of Rs 4464.326 million for
the period July 1992 to June 2001, a sum of Rs 1097.829 million only was
collected upto June 1999, which is 24.6% of the total revenues.
The toll collection is done through agency arrangement and the cost of
collection and operations is paid from these receipts and the net amount is
retained by NHA for funding of maintenance and rehabilitations schemes, as
provided under NHA Act, 1991.
The volume of collections is expected to increase further in coming
years mainly because of management of collections on commercial lines. Under
the arrangement, outside agencies are entrusted the responsibilities of
maintaining the roads, managing the traffic and collecting the toll to generate
revenues.
Other Receipts
It is customary to distinguish Revenue Receipts from other Receipts to
identify periodically the regular sources of income in the form of taxes,
levies, etc, and arbitrary sources of income which cannot be measured with
reference to a particular period and is contingent upon certain events. These
include: -
a.
Rates, Fee and
Taxes
b.
Sale Proceeds
of NHA Assets
c.
Sale of Tender
Documents
d.
Miscellaneous
receipts
e.
Profit
During FY 2000-2001, the total receipts on this account were Rs 229.149
million.
Generally, only operational and maintenance operations of road network
are made against the revenue account. However, in view of the inadequate
provision of resources from the government, these funds are utilized to meet
development expenditure. The details of operational and other expenditure made
during FY 2000-2001 are as under: -
a. Operational Charges: A sum
of Rs 1417.111 million has so far been utilized as operational charges as
against the revenue receipts of Rs 4464.326 million on gross basis for the
period December 1997 to June 2001.
b. Servicing of Loans: The position
of CDL and foreign loans upto June 30, 2001 is under review. Some of loans have
been received through PSDP. A sum of Rs 1.141 billion was debited by the
government to the PSDP allocation, which was later charged to Islamabad –
Lahore Motorway receipts, thereby increasing the level of dependence on NHA’s
own resources for debt servicing.
c. Loans to PSDP Projects: In view of the short releases of funds
under PSDP from the government and inevitably of making certain payments in
time during 2000-2001, borrowings from other NHA accounts such as Retention
Money, Revenue Receipts, etc, were utilized to finance PSDP during the
year. These amount to Rs 2143.641
million. The government has been approached to refund these amounts to enable
NHA to utilize them on the designated purposes.
|
YEARWISE BREAK-UP
OF CDL(GOP)/FOREIGN RELENT LOANS |
|||
|
UPTO 30-6-2001 |
|||
|
|
(Rupees. in Billion) |
||
|
|
Cash Development
Loan |
||
|
YEAR |
GOP |
FORIGN RELENT
LOAN |
|
|
1990-91 |
0.25 |
|
|
|
1991-92 |
5.152 |
1.022 |
|
|
1992-93 |
9.498 |
1.556 |
|
|
1993-94 |
8.084 |
2.142 |
|
|
1994-95 |
7.406 |
2.282 |
|
|
1995-96 |
6.100 |
2.367 |
|
|
1996-97 |
7.183 |
2.816 |
|
|
1997-98 |
9.952 |
2.446 |
|
|
1998-99 |
* 17.325 |
1.346 |
|
|
1999-2000 |
**16.364 |
2.379 |
|
|
2000-2001 |
*** 10.312 |
1.404 |
|
|
Total: - |
97.626 |
19.760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Guaranteed direct loans: |
|
||
|
i) Daewoo Loan for Islamabad – Lahore
Motorway |
US$
676 Million |
|
|
|
ii) Turkish Exim bank loan for (Islamabad – Peshawar Motorway) |
US$
58 Million |
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF REVENUE |
||
|
W.E.F. 01-7-1992 - 30-6-2001 |
||
|
|
|
(Rs. in Million) |
|
A |
UNDER O & M CONTRACTS |
|
|
|
TOLL RECEIPTS |
|
|
|
i) LAHORE-ISLAMABAD MOTORWAY
(M/s FWO) |
1731.139 |
|
|
ii) LAHORE-RAWALPINDI-TOORKHAM, |
1206.194 |
|
|
iii) LAHORE-KARACHI, HASANABDAL-ABBOTTABAD-THAKOT-GILGIT-KHUNJRAB,
SUKKUR-SIBI-SARYAB, QILLA
SAIFULLAH-LORALAI-DG KHAN-MULTAN & RBNA (M/s FWO) |
843.157 |
|
|
iv) PRIVATE CONTRACTORS |
649.624 |
|
|
v) WEIGHT BRIDGES/STATIONS (M/s. NLC) |
4.501 |
|
|
vi) ROW A/C. ADVERTISEMENT/PROMOTIONAL MATERIAL |
29.711 |
|
|
Total |
4464.326 |
|
B |
OTHER THAN O & M CONTRACTS |
|
|
|
i) SALE OF TENER DOCUMENTS |
37.262 |
|
|
ii) PROFIT |
1023.667 |
|
|
iii) MISCELLENIOUS RECEIPTS |
115.703 |
|
|
Total |
1176.632 |
|
|
Total (A + B ) |
5640.958 |
|
EXPENDITURE UPTO
30-6-2000 |
|||
|
ON ACCOUNT OF
PSDP (Public Sector Development Programme) |
|||
|
|
|
(Rs. in Million) |
|
|
|
EXPENDITURE |
||
|
YEAR |
L.C. |
F/AID |
TOTAL |
|
1991-92 |
5220.13 |
1071.609 |
6291.739 |
|
1992-93 |
7525.389 |
1554.894 |
9080.283 |
|
1993-94 |
8446.818 |
2142.063 |
10588.881 |
|
1994-95 |
8911.000 |
2281.851 |
11192.851 |
|
1995-96 |
6863.413 |
2367.18 |
9230.593 |
|
1996-97 |
7245.000 |
2816.000 |
10061.000 |
|
1997-98 |
10361.321 |
2445.801 |
12807.122 |
|
1998-99 |
10350.526 |
1345.753 |
11696.279 |
|
1999-2000 |
13659.464 |
2379.064 |
16038.528 |
|
Total: |
78583.061 |
18404.215 |
96987.276 |
NHA
- FINANCIAL REVIEW OF FY 2000-2001
Statement
of Sources and Application of Funds
GOP
Account
|
Inflows a. Cash Development Loans (PSDP) (Net) b.
Establishment Grant c.
Maintenance Grant Total (A) Outflows d.
PSDP Projects e.
Establishment i. 252 Core Posts ii. Maintenance iii. 1% Total (i+ii+iii) f. Maintenance (excluding
Estt) Total outflows (B) (d+e+f) Deficit (B-A) |
(Rs in
Million) 9171.283 21.699 482.000 9674.982 12413.274 28.347 13.369 143.855 185.571 617.382 13216.227 3541.245 |
FY 2000-01 ended with a net
deficit on GOP Account i.e. the funds provided by the government during the
year fell short by Rs 3541.245 million. The payments made by NHA in excess of
GOP receipts were inevitable because of contractual obligations, default
against which might have involved NHA into litigations or led to financial
implications due to penalties/interest on delayed payments. These inevitable
payments were, therefore, made through borrowings from the following accounts:
-
|
Account |
Rs in Million |
|
Revenue |
2143.641 |
|
Retention Money |
0469.840 |
|
NHA Main |
0078.027 |
|
Maintenance (cash at bank) |
0122.789 |
|
Carried Over Liabilities to FY 2001-02 |
0726.948 |
|
Total: |
3541.245 |
|
PSDP
2000-2001 |
Inflows
Against total demand of Rs 25.774 billion, including foreign aid of Rs
1.827 billion for the FY 2000-01, the government allocated a sum of Rs 15.000
billion including Rs 1.827 billion in FE.
The statement in the table mentioned below shows the project-wise detail
of PSDP allocation. However, NHA could not, as usual, get its full share of
allocation and the amount actually received was curtailed to Rs. 9171.282
million as detailed below: -
(Rs in Million)
|
Original PSDP (LC) Debt servicing Cuts applied by the GOP Funds actually received |
13172.745 1141.00 2860.463 9171.282 |
Outflows
Against
the actually released funds, NHA had to meet much higher liabilities of contractors,
consultants, etc, as the pace of work could not be slowed down suddenly. Timely
payments became necessary because of contractual obligations. Accordingly, NHA
incurred a total development expenditure of Rs 12413.274 million during FY
2000-01. Mode of financing is given below: -
Mode of Financing (Rs
in Million)
|
a. b. c. d. e. |
Total Project Expenditure Grant from the Government Shortfall (a – b) Borrowings (i + ii) i. From Revenue Account ii. From Retention Money
Account Liabilities Carried-over |
12413.274 9171.282 3241.992 2613.481 2143.641 469.840 628.511 |
As regards Foreign Currency allocation, a sum of Rs 1404.052
million was utilized against the allocation of Rs 1827.250 in respect of aided
projects.
The statement also gives
the financial position on PSDP funds allocated and expenditure incurred,
including the borrowings from other NHA accounts. The government has been
approached to refund these amounts, which were utilized as borrowing for
meeting unavoidable development expenditure during FY 2000-01, to NHA.
The major area of focus had
been the Islamabad-Peshawar Motorway as it took away 53.5% of the total
expenditure during the financial year.
An amount of Rs 6638.844 million was spent on this project against total
PSDP expenditure of Rs 12413.274 million (LC). A total amount of Rs 11.323 billion has been utilized on this
project upto June 30, 2001.
Maintenance Budget
Inflows
For FY 2000-01, against a demand
of Rs 3000 million, an allocation of only Rs 700 million was approved as
maintenance grant by the government. Funds released upto June 30, 2001 were
only Rs 482 million, which were only 16% of the actual requirement/demand for
FY 2000-01. Compared with previous years, the funds released (Rs 482 million)
were 20% lesser than the receipts of 1997-98 (Rs 600 million) and 1998-99 (Rs
604.6 million) and 27% less than 1999-2000 (Rs 660 million).
Outflows
As
stated above, only 16% of the requirement for maintenance was met by the
government during FY 2000-01. However, utmost effort was made to keep the swing
of maintenance activities as close to the level of previous year as possible.
Thus, funds amounting to Rs 630.751 million were arranged for this purpose.
Break-up is as under: -
Funding (Rs in Million)
|
Grant from the Government Debit to NHA Main Account Utilization of Cash at
Bank (Maintenance Account) Liabilities Carried
Forward Total: |
482.000 019.234 122.789 006.728 630.751 |
The
region wise distribution of maintenance funds is as under: -
Region (Rs in Million)
|
Punjab North Punjab South Sindh NWFP Balochistan Northern Areas Headquarters * Total: |
144.000 050.000 183.000 073.000 144.000 008.000 028.751 630.751 |
* Note: Salaries and establishment charges of persons employed
in connection with maintenance activities.
Establishment
Establishment Budget
(Government Grant)
Inflows
In order
to meet the establishment charges of 252 core posts of NHA, a sum of Rs 21.699
million was received from Ministry of Communication during the year (upto June
30, 2001) as against the allocation of Rs 23.411 million and Rs 28.541 million
requirement worked out for the year. In other words, the funds actually
received were 24% less than the actual requirement. When compared with FY
1999-2000, funds provided show marginal addition of Rs 0.393 million which is
only 1.8% in excess of the last year.
It is
apprehended that with such recurring insufficient provision of funds, the
financial constraints to meet establishment cost of NHA, despite downsizing,
would lead to dire situation of failure to meet even minimum cost of
establishment of NHA.
Outflows
A sum
of Rs 28.367 million was incurred as total expenditure on account of
Establishment Charges against 252 core posts of NHA giving rise to a shortfall
of Rs 6.648 million on GOP Account. The shortfall was financed out of the Main
Account of NHA. Break up of expenditure is as under: -
Head (Rs in Million)
|
Pay Allowances Utilities Medical Rental Charges Others Total: |
08.258 04.091 01.654 03.843 06.480 04.041 28.367 |
1% Special Allocation (Establishment Expenditure)
Inflows
Establishment
expenditure (1%) was budgeted for the first time in FY 2000-01. Against a
provision of Rs 91.710 million for NHA Headquarters and Regions, an expenditure
of Rs 143.855 million was incurred. This has resulted in the preparation of a consolidated
and uniform establishment charges budget for the Headquarters as well as
Regions.
Outflows
During
FY 2000-01, the level of expenditure against major heads of expenditure was as
follows. The shortfall between
provision and expenditure was met through utilization of cash balances in NHA
Main Account: -
Head (Rs
in Million)
|
Headquarters |
72.3555 |
|
Punjab (North) |
23.000 |
|
Sindh |
18.000 |
|
NWFP |
12.500 |
|
Balochistan |
9.000 |
|
Punjab (South) |
8.000 |
|
Northern Areas |
1.000 |
|
Total: Shortfall
|
143.855 52.145 |
Revenue Receipts
Inflows
Total revenue collection
for FY 2000-01 was Rs 2299.537 million.
90% of the revenues (Rs 2070.388 million) were contributed by O&M contracts
and remaining 10% (Rs 229.149) by other collection arrangements. Among O&M contracts,
Lahore-Rawalpindi-Torkham contributed 41% Lahore-Karachi 31% and Lahore-
Islamabad Motorway 22%.
A comparison
of revenues would reveal that FY 2000-01 witnessed an increase of 43% over FY
1999-2000. Total revenues for that year were Rs 1611.276 million. While there
was 59.7% increase in revenues from “O&M contracts”, a simultaneous decline
was registered in respect of “other revenues” by 27.3%. The individual
components show increase ranging from 40% to 392% and decrease ranging from 8%
to 54%. Toll receipts and profit had been the main areas of decrease.
Outflows
Expenditure Charged Against Revenue Receipts
Operational
Charges
The
first charge against the revenue account is operational and collection costs.
For FY 2000-01, a sum of Rs 629.517 million was incurred as operational
charges, which is 27.4% of the total revenues collected for the year.
Comparison with previous year viz FY 1999-2000 reveals that operational charges
increased by 34.4% as against the increase in revenue of 43%. The large
percentage increase in revenue compared with operational charges is significant
in terms of cost benefit scenario. The position is further confirmed when
operational charges as percentage of revenues collected for both the years are
compared—29% in 1999-00 and 27.4% in 2000-01.
Other Charges
In addition to operational
charges, for the first time, a sum of Rs 2143.641 million had to be used as
borrowings for financing PSDP during the year because of reduced receipt from
the government as originally expected/allocated.
Currently the subject authority has major projects in hand as mentioned
below:
Karachi-Lahore-Peshwar (N-5)
1 Construction of New Bridge
over River Sutlej near Bahawalpur
2 Chablat Nowshera
3 TMP-Zahir Pir Section-I
4 Zahir Pir-BWP Section-II
5 Rehab. Of exixting carriageway
Lalamusa-Gulyana-Tutha Rai Bahader
6 Okara Bypass
7 Rehab. & Improvement of
Wazirabad Bypass
8 Dualization & Upgradation
of Multan-Qadirpur Rawan Section
Karachi-Quetta-Chaman (N-25)
9 Khuzdar Shahdadkot,
Sec-IV,Contract Package -III
10 Khuzdar Shahdadkot,
Sec-IV,Contract Package -III
Hassanabdal- Khunjrab (N-35)
11 Rehab of Bridges on KKH
Nowshera-Dir-Chitral (N-45)
12 Lowari Tunnel Southern Portal
Access Road
13 Lowari Tunnel Northern Portal
Access Road
14 Dualization of Takht Bahi to
Shergarh Road ( Pack I )
15 Dualization of Shergarh to
Dargai Road ( Pack II )
16 Rehabilation of
Dargai-Chakdara Section
17 Improvement and widening of
Timergara-Akhagram Road ( Phase I )
Kuchlak-Zhob-D.I. Khan (N-50)
18 5 Bridges on Zam
Tower-Mughalkot
19 2 Bridges at Km-71 on N-50
Section - I
20 D.I. Khan- Mughalkot
21 6 Bridges including approach
road on N-50 ( Zhob Mughalkot )
Kotri-D.I. Khan-Peshwar (N-55)
22 Rehabilation of ECW of IHP
D.G Khan-Rajanpur ( Package A )
23 Rehabilation of ECW of IHP
D.G Khan-Rajanpur ( Package B )
24 Rehabilation of ECW of IHP
D.G Khan-Rajanpur ( Package C )
Sukkur-Sibi-Saryab (N-65)
25 Nuttal -Sibbi
26 Realignment of Mehrabpur and
Dera Allah Yar Town
Qila Saifullah-Multan (N-70)
27 Widening and Strengthening of
Qila Saifullah -Loralai-Bewata
28 Khajuri-Bewata
29 Shershah Bridge
Islamabad- Kohala (N-75)
30 Islamabad -Muzaffarabad
Project
31 Jhalkhad - Chillas Section
32 Naran-Jhalkhad Section National Highway
Improvement Programe (NHIP)
33 Rehabilation & Improvement of
Karachi-Hyderabad Super Highway (NB)
Km 101-Km 149
34 Rehabilation & Improvement of
Hyderabad-Hala (SB) Km 163 - Km 211
35 Rehabilation & Improvement of
Hala-Chanesar Bridge (SB) Km 215 - Km 267
36 Rehabilation & Improvement of Chanesar
Bridge-Moro (SB) Km 267- Km 315
37 Resurfacing & Strengthening of
Gujranwala-Kharian (NB) Km 1320 - Km 1350
38 Resurfacing & Strengthening of
Gujranwala-Kharian (NB) Km 1383- Km 1410
39 Resurfacing & Strengthening of
Gujranwala-Kharian (SB) Km 1384.8 - Km 1410
40 Resurfacing & Strengthening of
Nowshera-Peshawar (NB/SB) Km 1660 - Km 1694
Miscellaneous
41 Torkham-Jalalabad
42 Karachi Northern Bypass
package-I
43 Lyari Expressway project
Islamabad - Peshwar Motorway (M-1)
44 Completion of Balance Work
Islamabad - Lahore Motorway (M-2)
45 Makhdoom Interchange
Retodero - Gwadar Motorway (M-8)
46 Gawadar-Turbat,Section -I
Package-II-A
47 Gawadar-Turbat,Section -I
Package-II-B
48 Turbat-Hoshab,Section -II
Package-II-A
The Government of Pakistan (GOP) decided to federalize seventeen
important inter-provincial roads in 1978 and created the National Highway Board
for development and maintenance of these federalized roads named as “National
Highways”. Total length of the federalized roads now stands at 8780 KMs.
The National Highway Authority (NHA) was created, in 1991, through an
Act of the Parliament, for planning, development, operation, repair and
maintenance of National Highways and Strategic Roads specially entrusted to NHA
by the Federal Government or by a Provincial Government or other authority
concerned.
The Government of Pakistan, in 1978, decided to federalize important
inter-provincial roads. The erstwhile National Highway Board (NHB) was created
for the development and maintenance of the federalized roads, which were named
as "National Highways". The NHB was replaced by the National Highway
Authority (NHA), created through an Act of the Parliament, in 1991. All the
National Highways/Strategic Roads are now the responsibility of the NHA.
NHA is responsible for the development, operation and maintenance of
National Highways. It was established to plan, promote, organize and implement
programmes for construction, development, operation, repair and maintenance of
National Highways and Strategic Roads. The total length of roads under NHA
(8,780 KMs), account for 3 % of the entire road network and 75 % of the
commercial road traffic in the country.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.44.26 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.79.00 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.63.53 |
RATING
EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable
factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of
interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Unfavourable & favourable factors carry similar weight in credit
consideration. Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems
comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
NR |
In view of the lack of information, we have no basis upon which to
recommend credit dealings |
No Rating |
|
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)