![]()
|
Report Date : |
02.12.2011 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
ASIAN CARATS PTE LTD |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
|
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2005 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
06.02.1996 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
199600943Z |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Limited Exempt Private Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Retail |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
Not Available |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
No Complaints |
|
Litigation : |
Exists |
|
: |
ASIAN CARATS
PTE LTD |
|
|
Registration
No |
: |
199600943Z |
|
Date of
Registration |
: |
06/02/1996 |
|
Former Name |
: |
NA |
|
Date of
Change of Name |
: |
NA |
|
Type of
Company |
: |
LIMITED
EXEMPT PRIVATE COMPANY |
|
Registered
Address |
: |
|
|
Date of
Change of Address |
: |
25/10/2004 |
|
Contact No. |
: |
6220 8502 |
|
Fax No. |
: |
6738 2478 |
|
Website |
: |
NA |
|
Registered
Activities |
: |
1. GENERAL
WHOLESALE TRADE (INCLUDING GENERAL IMPORTERS AND EXPORTERS) 2. RETAIL |
|
Issued
Ordinary Capital* |
: |
$3,300,000.00
|
|
Issued
Preference Capital |
: |
NA |
|
Paid-Up
Ordinary Capital |
: |
$3,300,000.00
|
|
Paid-Up
Preference Capital |
: |
NA |
|
* Number of
Shares includes number of Issued Treasury Shares |
||
|
Issued
Treasury Capital |
: |
NA |
|
Paid-Up
Treasury Capital |
: |
NA |
|
No. of Local
Subsidiaries |
: |
NA |
|
No. of Local
Associates |
: |
NA |
|
Auditor |
: |
HELMI TALIB
& CO |
|
Bankers /
Financiers |
: |
UCO BANK |
|
Turnover |
: |
|
|
Net Worth |
: |
|
|
No. of Bank
Charges |
: |
2 |
|
No. of
Litigation Suits |
: |
1 |
|
S1000 / SME
500 / FG50 Ranking |
: |
|
|
Compounded
Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) |
: |
157.56% (3
years) |
|
: |
NARENDRA S/O AMRITLAL |
|
|
SHAREHOLDER
ID |
: |
S1674807B |
|
NATIONALITY |
: |
|
|
ADDRESS |
: |
|
|
NO. OF ORD SHARES |
: |
45,000 |
|
CURRENCY |
: |
|
|
|
||
|
NAME |
: |
HITESH S/O AMRIT LAL |
|
SHAREHOLDER
ID |
: |
S1772385E |
|
NATIONALITY |
: |
|
|
ADDRESS |
: |
|
|
NO. OF ORD SHARES |
: |
2,045,000 |
|
CURRENCY |
: |
|
|
|
||
|
NAME |
: |
SONAL |
|
SHAREHOLDER
ID |
: |
S2605983F |
|
NATIONALITY |
: |
|
|
ADDRESS |
: |
|
|
NO. OF ORD SHARES |
: |
600,000 |
|
CURRENCY |
: |
|
|
|
||
|
NAME |
: |
ASHA HITESH TIMBADIA |
|
SHAREHOLDER
ID |
: |
S7272163B |
|
NATIONALITY |
: |
|
|
ADDRESS |
: |
|
|
NO. OF ORD SHARES |
: |
600,000 |
|
CURRENCY |
: |
|
|
|
||
|
NAME |
: |
DHAVAL GUNVANT SHAH |
|
SHAREHOLDER
ID |
: |
V173555 |
|
NATIONALITY |
: |
INDIAN |
|
ADDRESS |
: |
41/B SHIVNER |
|
NO. OF ORD SHARES |
: |
10,000 |
|
CURRENCY |
: |
|
|
: |
HITESH
S/O AMRIT LAL |
|
|
ADDRESS |
: |
|
|
POSITION |
: |
DIRECTOR SECRETARY |
|
DATE OF APPT |
: |
06/02/1996 14/04/2004 |
|
NATIONALITY |
: |
|
|
I/C PASSPORT |
: |
S1772385E |
|
|
||
|
NAME |
: |
SONAL
|
|
ADDRESS |
: |
|
|
POSITION |
: |
DIRECTOR |
|
DATE OF APPT |
: |
01/04/2003 |
|
NATIONALITY |
: |
|
|
I/C PASSPORT |
: |
S2605983F |
|
|
||
|
NAME |
: |
ASHA
HITESH TIMBADIA |
|
ADDRESS |
: |
|
|
POSITION |
: |
DIRECTOR |
|
DATE OF APPT |
: |
01/04/2003 |
|
NATIONALITY |
: |
|
|
I/C PASSPORT |
: |
S7272163B |
|
HITESH S/O AMRIT
LAL |
|
|
NRIC Number: |
S1772385E |
|
Available Address: |
|
Current Business Interest
|
No. |
Name |
Position |
Appt
Date |
#of
Share |
% |
|
ASIAN CARATS PTE
LTD |
DIRECTOR |
06/02/1996 |
2045000 |
61.96 |
|
|
2 |
ASIAN CARATS PTE
LTD |
SECRETARY |
14/04/2004 |
2045000 |
61.96 |
|
3 |
HITESH TRADING CO |
MANAGER |
01/04/2003 |
- |
- |
Previous Business
|
No. |
Name |
Status |
Position |
Appt
Date |
Last
Known Inactive Date |
|
HITESH TRADING CO |
LIVE |
OWNER |
12/09/1987 |
01/04/2003 |
|
|
2 |
MAP EQUIPMENTS |
LIVE |
OWNER |
18/11/1999 |
01/04/2003 |
Bankruptcy Record
|
Case
No. |
Year |
Date
of Filing |
Petitioner
Name |
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation Search – Writ of Summons
|
Court |
Case No. |
Year |
Date
of Filing |
Amount |
Cause
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
Shareholdings (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject
enjoys a normal banking routine with its bankers. To date, there have been 2
bank charges registered against Subject by its bankers. The charge numbers are:
|
Charge
No. |
: |
C200707304 |
|
|
|
Date
of Registration |
: |
05/09/2007 |
|
|
Chargee |
: |
UCO
BANK |
|
|
|||
|
2) |
Charge
No. |
: |
199703745 |
|
|
Date
of Registration |
: |
24/06/1997 |
|
|
Chargee |
: |
UCO
BANK |
To date, there have been 1 litigation
suits filed against Subject.
The details are as follows:
|
Court |
: |
Magistrate
Court |
|
|
|
Case
No. |
: |
31297 |
|
|
Date
of Filing |
: |
30/11/1998 |
|
|
Amount
|
: |
0.00 |
|
|
Cause |
: |
Contracts
- Employment |
|
|
Case
Status |
: |
CONCLUDED |
|
|
Plaintiff |
: |
NG
KHEM SHENG |
|
Date of Last AGM |
: |
|
|
Date of Last AR |
: |
29/07/2009 |
|
Date of A/C Laid At Last AGM |
: |
31/12/2008 |
|
Financial Figures |
|||||
|
|
DEC
2005 |
%
Change |
DEC
2004 |
MAR
2003 |
MAR
2002 |
|
Currency |
|
|
SGD
- SIN |
|
|
|
Profit and Loss Key Figures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,343,624 |
-6.00 |
69,513,561 |
2,399,913 |
3,824,434 |
|
|
Profit/(Loss) Before Tax |
390,722 |
-21.00 |
494,586 |
23,542 |
(11,521) |
|
Profit After Tax attributable
to Shareholders |
390,722 |
-21.00 |
494,586 |
23,542 |
(11,521) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Key Figures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
12,384,164 |
-12.17 |
14,100,177 |
2,017,565 |
3,334,255 |
|
Current Assets |
12,008,860 |
-12.37 |
13,703,602 |
2,017,565 |
3,334,255 |
|
Non Current Assets |
375,304 |
-5.36 |
396,575 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
10,362,127 |
-16.90 |
12,468,862 |
4,263,014 |
5,603,246 |
|
Current Liabilities |
10,362,127 |
-16.90 |
12,468,862 |
4,263,014 |
5,603,246 |
|
Non Current Liabilities |
0 |
NA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Funds |
2,022,037 |
23.95 |
1,631,315 |
2,245,449 |
2,268,991 |
|
Share Capital |
3,300,000 |
0.00 |
3,300,000 |
300,000 |
300,000 |
|
Total Reserves |
(1,277,963) |
NA |
(1,668,685) |
(2,545,449) |
(2,568,991) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
DEC
2005 |
DEC
2004 |
MAR
2003 |
MAR
2002 |
|
Growth % |
|
|
|
|
|
-6.00 |
2,796.50 |
-37.25 |
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profitability |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit Margin (%) |
0.60 |
0.71 |
0.98 |
NA |
|
Return on Equity (%) |
19.32 |
30.32 |
1.05 |
NA |
|
Return on Assets (%) |
3.16 |
3.51 |
1.17 |
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt/Equity (Times) |
5.12 |
7.64 |
1.90 |
2.47 |
|
Current Debt/Equity (Times) |
5.12 |
7.64 |
1.90 |
2.47 |
|
Long Term Debt To Equity (Times) |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Total Asset To Total Equity (Times) |
6.12 |
8.64 |
0.90 |
1.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets Turnover (Times) |
5.28 |
4.93 |
1.19 |
1.15 |
|
Fixed Assets Turnover (Times) |
174.11 |
175.28 |
NA |
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity |
|
|
|
|
|
Current Ratio (Times) |
1.16 |
1.10 |
0.47 |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The company's CAGR is 157.56% (3 years).
CAGR is the year-over-year growth rate of a company over a
specified period. Instead of looking at the average growth rate, CAGR allow
users to look at the annualized growth rate of a company over a given period, a
more indicative measure of growth of a company’s performance over a given period.
Profitability
The company yielded a rate of
net profit on sales of 0.60 per cent in FY05 (FY04: 0.71 per cent). The company
is now able to book in
Liquidity

Current ratio stood at 1.16
times in FY05 (FY04: 1.10 times). This means that the company has
A minimum figure of 1.0 would be considered the lowest limit
that this figure should reach. Any business that has a current ratio near 1.0
may be heading for liquidity problems, and would need to be closely monitored.
A figure greater than 2.0 would be more desirable, to act as a buffer against
any short-term liquidity problems, and give creditors/bank managers a degree of
comfort when granting credit/finance.
Leverage

Total debt-to-equity ratio
notched 5.12 times in FY05, compared with 7.64 times in FY04. This means that
the company requires additional external financing of
Generally, a total debt-to-equity ratio of less than 0.5
times is preferred. The ratio measures the proportion of the company's reliance
on external debt for financing, relative to the shareholder's fund. A lower
ratio would imply a greater financial safety and operating freedom for the
company.
Efficiency Ratio
Return on equity was 19.32 per cent for Subject in the
current financial period, as compared to 30.32 per cent a year ago. The return
on equity measures the return earned on the owner's investment. Generally, the higher this return, the better
off the owner.
Return on assets stood at 3.16 per cent (FY04: 3.51 per
cent). The return on asset measures the overall effectiveness of management in
generating profit with its available assets.
Total assets turnover ratio logged at 5.28 times in FY05
(FY04: 4.93 times). This ratio measures the company's ability to make
productive use of its total assets to generate sales which reflects the
efficiency of the management in utilising its resources.
DIAMOND INDUSTRY –
INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world
as the birthplace for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of
diamonds but history says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in
India. Diamond production in India can be traced back to almost 8th
Century B.C. India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th
Century when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of
S. Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was
possible only due to combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian
workforce and the untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires,
supported by progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses
derives its importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations
which operate in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business
enterprises include spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction
costs, small, nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage
and philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on
many fronts including higher standard of corporate governance, long-term performance
– focused strategies, modern management and technology.
-
The diamond jewellery industry in India today may be
more than Rs 60000 mil and is rated amongst the fastest growing in the
world. Indi ranks third in the world in domestic diamond consumption.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with
some medium and large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious
import – export, inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In
the process, several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees.
They mostly diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and
capital markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th
October 2010 is as under –
DIAMOND SAGA – DIRTY DOZEN STUCK WITH 2K CR DEBT
This could be the biggest credibility crisis
the Indian diamond industry has ever faced. Fifteen banks run the risk of
losing Rs 2000 crore lent to a dozen diamond firms in Surat. Until about two
months ago, they had not repaid these dues. Bankers believe many diamantaires
borrowed money during the economic downturn two years ago and diverted funds to
businesses like real estate and capital markets. Many of themselves made money
from these businesses but their diamond companies have gone sick and declared
insolvency.
-
Most of the money borrowed from the banks in the name
of their diamond business has been diverted in real estate and the share
market. The banks are not in a position to seize their properties because in
many cases, these were purchased in the name of their relatives and friends.
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.51.65 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.81.06 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.69.51 |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
---- |
NB |
New Business |
---- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial condition
(40%) Ownership background
(20%) Payment record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.