![]()
MIRA INFORM REPORT
|
Report Date : |
08.12.2011 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
ARJAV
EXPORT CO., LTD. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
Room 305, 3rd Floor,
J.K. Building, 4-6
Mahaesak 3 Road,
Suriyawongse, Bangrak,
Bangkok 10500, Thailand |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Thailand |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2010 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
18.08.2008 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
0105551092606 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Importer, Distributor and Exporter of Diamonds, Gemstones and Jewelry Products |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees
: |
10 Persons |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
|
|
|
Payment
Behaviour : |
No Complaints |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – September 30th, 2011
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (30.06.2011) |
Current Rating (30.09.2011) |
|
Thailand |
b1 |
b1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
ARJAV EXPORT CO.,
LTD.
BUSINESS
ADDRESS : ROOM
305, 3rd FLOOR,
J.K. BUILDING,
4-6
MAHAESAK
3 ROAD, SURIYAWONGSE,
BANGRAK,
BANGKOK 10500, THAILAND
TELEPHONE : [66] 2635-6775,
081 645-6796, 086
061-7273
FAX :
[66] 2635-6775
E-MAIL
ADDRESS : arjavexport@yahoo.com
REGISTRATION
ADDRESS : SAME
AS BUSINESS ADDRESS
ESTABLISHED
: 2008
REGISTRATION
NO. : 0105551092606
CAPITAL REGISTERED : BHT. 4,000,000
CAPITAL PAID-UP : BHT.
4,000,000
SHAREHOLDER’S PROPORTION : THAI :
51%
INDIAN
: 49%
FISCAL YEAR CLOSING DATE : DECEMBER 31
LEGAL
STATUS : PRIVATE LIMITED
COMPANY
EXECUTIVE : MR. PARESH KUMAR
KHIMJIBHAI DIYORA,
INDIAN
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.
OF STAFF : 10
LINES
OF BUSINESS : DIAMONDS, GEMSTONES AND
JEWELRY
PRODUCTS
IMPORTER, DISTRIBUTOR
AND EXPORTER
OPERATING
TREND : STABLE
PRESENT
SITUATION : OPERATING NORMALLY
REPUTATION : FAIR
WITH NORMAL BUSINESS
ENGAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
STANDARD : MANAGEMENT WITH
FAIR PERFORMANCE
The
subject was established on
August 18, 2008
as a private
limited company under the
registered name style
ARJAV EXPORT CO.,
LTD., by Thai
and Indian groups,
with the objective to engage in trading business in the field
of jewelry industry. It
currently employs approximately
10 staff.
The
subject’s registered address
is Room 305, 3rd Flr., J.K.
Building, 4-6 Mahaesak 3 Rd.,
Suriyawongse, Bangrak, Bangkok
10500, and this
is the subject’s
current operation address.
|
Name |
|
Nationality |
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Paresh Kumar Khimjibhai
Diyora |
[x] |
Indian |
31 |
|
Mr. Jignesh Kumar Khimbhai
Diyora |
|
Indian |
26 |
Only the mentioned
director [x] can
sign on behalf
of the subject
with company’s affixed.
Mr. Paresh Kumar Khimjibhai
Diyora is the
Managing Director.
He is Indian
nationality with the
age of 31
years old.
Mr. Jignesh Kumar Khimjibhai
Diyora is the
Marketing Manager.
He is Indian
nationality with the
age of 26
years old.
The subject
is engaged in importing,
distributing and exporting
of diamonds, gemstones and
jewelry products.
PURCHASE
The
products are purchased
from both local
and overseas suppliers
mainly in India.
SALES
The products are
sold to customer
both locally and
overseas, mainly in India,
Hong Kong and
Singapore.
SUBSIDIARY AND AFFILIATED
COMPANY
The subject is
not found to
have any subsidiary
or affiliated company
here in Thailand.
LITIGATION
Bankruptcy and Receivership
There are no
litigation on bankruptcy
and receivership cases
filed against the
subject found at
Legal Execution Department
for the past
five years.
Others
There are no
legal suits filed
against the subject
for the past
two years.
CREDIT
Sales are by
cash or on
the credits term
of 30-60 days.
Local bills are
paid by cash
or on the
credits term of
30-60 days.
Imports are by
D/A or T/T
on negotiated terms.
Exports are against
T/T.
BANKING
The
banker’s name was
not disclosed.
EMPLOYMENT
The
subject employs approximately 10 staff.
LOCATION
DETAILS
The
premise is rented
for administrative office
at the heading
address. Premise is
located in prime
commercial area.
REMARK
MAXIMUM
CREDIT SHOULD BE
GRANTED AT US$
50,000.
COMMENT
The subject’s operating
performance in 2010
was sharply dropped comparing
to the same
period of 2009
due to high
competition and a
decrease in the
demand of the
products from both
local and export
markets. Generally, the
subject is doing
moderate business and
anticipates a better
performance this year.
The
capital was registered
at Bht. 4,000,000 divided into 40,000 shares of
Bht. 100 each with fully
paid.
THE SHAREHOLDERS
LISTED WERE : [as at
November 2, 2011]
|
NAME |
HOLDING |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Paresh Kumar Khimjibhai
Diyora Nationality: Indian Address : 62/3
Surawong Rd., Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok |
19,600 |
49.00 |
|
Ms. Somporng Waengwan Nationality: Thai Address : 144
Moo 18, Phothong, Ponethong,
Roi-ed |
4,400 |
11.00 |
|
Mr. Sorasak Boonmalert Nationality: Thai Address : 110
Krungthep-Kreetha Rd., Huamark,
Bangkapi, Bangkok |
4,000 |
10.00 |
|
Ms. Duanphen Chaboonma Nationality: Thai Address : 10
Moo 13, Maklaekao,
Sungnern, Nakornratchasima |
4,000 |
10.00 |
|
Mr. Komsan Harnpairojkajorn Nationality: Thai Address : 4-6
Mahaesak 3 Rd.,
suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok |
4,000 |
10.00 |
|
Mrs. Noi Harnpairojkajorn Nationality: Thai Address : 301
Moo 15, Bangkaew,
Bangplee,
Samutprakarn |
4,000 |
10.00 |
Total Shareholders : 6
Share Structure [as at
November 2, 2011]
|
Nationality |
Shareholders |
No. of Share |
% Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thai |
5 |
20,400 |
51.00 |
|
Indian |
1 |
19,600 |
49.00 |
|
Total |
6 |
40,000 |
100.00 |
NAME OF AUDITOR
& CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANT NO. :
Ms. Dara Parksuchon
No. 1312
The latest financial figures published for December 31, 2010 & 2009 were:
ASSETS
|
Current Assets |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalent |
158,070.59 |
657,398.90 |
|
Trade Accounts Receivable |
5,159,919.64 |
6,973,091.72 |
|
Inventories |
9,201,816.87 |
1,545,791.97 |
|
Other Current Assets |
- |
109,263.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
14,519,807.10 |
9,285,545.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Loan to Related
Person |
- |
1,400,000.00 |
|
Fixed Assets |
57,337.59 |
76,133.84 |
|
Total Assets |
14,577,144.69 |
10,761,679.53 |
LIABILITIES &
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY [BAHT]
|
Current
Liabilities |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Accounts Payable |
9,877,228.02 |
6,032,995.64 |
|
Short-term Loan from Related
Person |
191,000.00 |
- |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
102,319.63 |
126,402.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
10,170,547.65 |
6,159,397.72 |
|
Total Liabilities |
10,170,547.65 |
6,159,397.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital : Baht 100
par value authorized, issued
and fully paid share
capital 40,000 shares |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Paid |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
|
Retained Earning-
Unappropriated |
406,597.04 |
602,281.81 |
|
Total Shareholders' Equity |
4,406,597.04 |
4,602,281.81 |
|
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity |
14,577,144.69 |
10,761,679.53 |
|
Sales |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Income |
15,195,316.90 |
23,991,925.23 |
|
Other Income |
531,293.91 |
183,576.05 |
|
Total Saless |
15,726,610.81 |
24,175,501.28 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods
Sold |
13,881,781.39 |
22,146,533.87 |
|
Selling Expenses |
197,375.04 |
42,090.00 |
|
Administrative Expenses |
1,821,118.99 |
1,072,611.74 |
|
Total Expenses |
15,900,275.42 |
23,261,235.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit / [Loss] before Financial Cost & Income Tax |
[173,664.61] |
914,265.67 |
|
Financial Cost |
[5,473.48] |
[11,213.55] |
|
Profit / [Loss] before Income
Tax |
[179,138.09] |
903,052.12 |
|
Income Tax |
[16,546.68] |
[112,562.41] |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit / [Loss] |
[195,684.77] |
790,489.71 |
|
ITEM |
UNIT |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
CURRENT RATIO |
TIMES |
1.43 |
1.51 |
|
QUICK RATIO |
TIMES |
0.52 |
1.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
265.01 |
315.13 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
1.04 |
2.23 |
|
INVENTORY CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
241.95 |
25.48 |
|
INVENTORY TURNOVER |
TIMES |
1.51 |
14.33 |
|
RECEIVABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
123.94 |
106.08 |
|
RECEIVABLES TURNOVER |
TIMES |
2.94 |
3.44 |
|
PAYABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
259.71 |
99.43 |
|
CASH CONVERSION CYCLE |
DAYS |
106.19 |
32.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFITABILITY
RATIO |
|
|
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
% |
91.36 |
92.31 |
|
SELLING & ADMINISTRATION |
% |
13.28 |
4.65 |
|
INTEREST |
% |
0.04 |
0.05 |
|
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
12.14 |
8.46 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN BEFORE EX. ITEM |
% |
(1.14) |
3.81 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
(1.29) |
3.29 |
|
RETURN ON EQUITY |
% |
(4.44) |
17.18 |
|
RETURN ON ASSET |
% |
(1.34) |
7.35 |
|
EARNING PER SHARE |
BAHT |
(4.89) |
19.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVERAGE RATIO |
|
|
|
|
DEBT RATIO |
TIMES |
0.70 |
0.57 |
|
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO |
TIMES |
2.31 |
1.34 |
|
TIME INTEREST EARNED |
TIMES |
(31.73) |
81.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL GROWTH |
|
|
|
|
SALES GROWTH |
% |
(36.66) |
|
|
OPERATING PROFIT |
% |
(118.99) |
|
|
NET PROFIT |
% |
(124.75) |
|
|
FIXED ASSETS |
% |
(24.69) |
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
% |
35.45 |
|

|
Gross Profit Margin |
12.14 |
Satisfactory |
Industrial
Average |
14.06 |
|
Net Profit Margin |
(1.29) |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
(0.58) |
|
Return on Assets |
(1.34) |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
(0.85) |
|
Return on Equity |
(4.44) |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
(2.25) |
Gross Profit Margin used to assess a firm's financial health by
revealing the proportion of money left over from saless after accounting for the
cost of goods sold. Gross profit margin serves as the source for paying
additional expenses and future savings. The company's figure is 12.14%. When
compared with the industry average, the ratio of the company was lower. This
indicated that company was originated from the problems with control over its
costs.
Net Profit Margin is the indicator of the company's efficiency in that
net profit takes into consideration all expenses of the company. A low profit
margin indicates a low margin of safety, higher risk that a decline in sales
will erase profits and result in a net loss. The company's figure is -1.29%.
When compared with the industry average, the ratio of the company was lower.
Return on Assets measures how efficiently profits are being generated from
the assets employed in the business when compared with the ratios of firms in a
similar business. A low ratio in comparison with industry averages indicates an
inefficient use of business assets. When compared with the industry average, it
was lower, the company's figure is -1.34%.
Return on Equity indicates how profitable a company is by comparing its
net income to its average shareholders' equity, ROE measures how much the
shareholders earned for their investment in the company. When compared with the
industry average, it was lower, the company's figure is -4.44%.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Return on Assets Downtrend
Return on Equity Downtrend

|
Current Ratio |
1.43 |
Acceptable |
Industrial
Average |
2.53 |
|
Quick Ratio |
0.52 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Conversion Cycle |
106.19 |
|
|
|
The Current Ratio is to ascertain whether a company's short-term assets
are readily available to pay off its short-term liabilities. The company's figure
is 1.43 times in 2010, decrease from 1.51 times, then it is generally
considered to have good short-term financial strength. When compared with the
industry average, the ratio of the company was lower.
The Quick Ratio is a liquidity indicator that further refines the
current ratio by measuring the amount of the most liquid current assets there
are to cover current liabilities. The company's figure is 0.52 times in 2010,
decrease from 1.24 times, then the company has not enough current assets that presumably
can be quickly converted to cash for pay financial obligations.
The Cash Conversion Cycle measures the number of days a company's cash
is tied up in the production and sales process of its operations and the benefit
from payment terms from its creditors. It meant the company could survive when
no cash inflow was received from sale for 107 days.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Current Ratio Uptrend


|
Debt Ratio |
0.70 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
0.84 |
|
Debt to Equity Ratio |
2.31 |
Risky |
Industrial
Average |
2.26 |
|
Times Interest Earned |
(31.73) |
Risky |
Industrial
Average |
0.37 |
Debt to Equity Ratio a measurement of how much suppliers, lenders,
creditors and obligors have committed to the company versus what the
shareholders have committed. A lower the percentage means that the company is
using less leverage and has a stronger equity position.
Times Interest Earned measuring a company's ability to meet its debt
obligations. Ratio is -31.73 lower than 1, so the company is not generating
enough cash from EBIT to meet its interest obligations.
Debt Ratio shows the proportion of a company's assets which are financed
through debt. The company's figure is 0.7 greater than 0.5, most of the
company's assets are financed through debt.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Debt Ratio Uptrend
Times Interest Earned Uptrend

|
Fixed Assets Turnover |
265.01 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
13.38 |
|
Total Assets Turnover |
1.04 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
2.13 |
|
Inventory Conversion Period |
241.95 |
|
|
|
|
Inventory Turnover |
1.51 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
3.34 |
|
Receivables Conversion Period |
123.94 |
|
|
|
|
Receivables Turnover |
2.94 |
Acceptable |
Industrial
Average |
4.67 |
|
Payables Conversion Period |
259.71 |
|
|
|
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Fixed Assets Turnover Uptrend
Total Assets Turnover Uptrend
Inventory Turnover Uptrend
Receivables Turnover Uptrend
DIAMOND INDUSTRY –
INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world as the birthplace
for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of diamonds but history
says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in India. Diamond
production in India can be traced back to almost 8th Century B.C.
India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th Century
when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of S.
Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was possible only due to
combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian workforce and the
untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires, supported by
progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses derives its importance
from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations which operate in the
diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business enterprises include
spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction costs, small,
nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage and
philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on many fronts including
higher standard of corporate governance, long-term performance – focused
strategies, modern management and technology.
-
The diamond jewellery industry in India today may be more than Rs 60000
mil and is rated amongst the fastest growing in the world. Indi ranks
third in the world in domestic diamond consumption.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with some medium and
large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious import – export,
inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In the process,
several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees. They mostly
diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and capital
markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th October 2010 is as
under –
DIAMOND SAGA – DIRTY DOZEN STUCK WITH 2K CR DEBT
This could be the biggest credibility crisis
the Indian diamond industry has ever faced. Fifteen banks run the risk of
losing Rs 2000 crore lent to a dozen diamond firms in Surat. Until about two
months ago, they had not repaid these dues. Bankers believe many
diamantaires borrowed money during the economic downturn two years ago and
diverted funds to businesses like real estate and capital markets. Many of
themselves made money from these businesses but their diamond companies have
gone sick and declared insolvency.
-
Most of the money borrowed from the banks in the name of their diamond
business has been diverted in real estate and the share market. The banks are
not in a position to seize their properties because in many cases, these were
purchased in the name of their relatives and friends.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.51.45 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.80.38 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.69.12 |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
---- |
NB |
New Business |
---- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.