![]()
|
Report Date : |
02.05.2011 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
AAROHI DIAM |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
|
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
14.11.1986. |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Traders,
polishers, importers and exporters of diamonds of various types (large and small,
from 10 carats to larger than 25 carats). |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
No Complaints |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – December 31, 2010
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (30.09.2010) |
Current Rating (31.12.2010) |
|
|
A2 |
A2 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
AAROHI DIAM
Telephone 972 3 752 56 42
Fax 972 3 752 56 45
Diamond Exchange,
Noam Bldg.
A private limited
company, incorporated as per file No. 51-115134-2 on the 14.11.1986.
Authorized share
capital of
2,640 ordinary shares of
of which 2,500
shares amounting to
1. B.A.N. TRADING & INVESTMENTS, 35%, of the
2. Rupen Bhansali, 20%,
3. Ashuk Shah, 15%, of
4. Ankor Bhansali, 15%,
5. Jay Gotualla, 15%, of
1. Rupen Bhansali, General Manager,
2. Ankor Bhansali,
3. Jay Gotualla.
Traders,
polishers, importers and exporters of diamonds of various types (large and
small, from 10 carats to larger than 25 carats).
Operating from
offices, in
Having 9-10
employees, as of 2010.
Financial data not
forthcoming.
There are 5 charge
for unlimited amounts registered on the company's assets, in favor of
Sales figures not forthcoming.
AAROHI DIAM
Bank Leumi
Le'Israel Ltd., Ramat Gan Branch (No. 629),
Union Bank of
Israel Ltd., Ramat Gan Branch (No. 062),
Nothing
unfavorable learned.
Despite our
efforts, so far we were unable to speak to subject's shareholder and General
Manager, Mr. Rupen Bhansali, as he was always unavailable (other officials
refused to disclose data on subject). We left a message. We shall update you in
case we manage to get any new data.
In the past
subject's officials refused to disclose financial data.
Subject is a
veteran diamond firm in the local diamond industry. According to our sources, the
company enjoys very good reputation.
In the end of 2002, subject was officially recognized by the Israel-Asia
Chamber of Commerce for its contribution to the development of bilateral trade
between the two countries.
In October 2004, it was reported that subject opened a new
office in
During 2010 and
2011 local diamond companies have been recovering from one of the worst
depressions in the global diamond sector due to the severe economic crisis in
global markets that erupted in September 2008. The diamond sector experienced
almost an entire freeze and collapse in sales of about 70% in the peak of the
crisis and 2009 export diamonds shrank by some 40%. Only since mid
According to the
President of the Israeli Diamonds Association, local diamond sector in general
managed to cross the crisis, despite the sheer difficulties, including the fact
that local banks contracted credit given to local diamond firms. The President
said that trade in the sector rolls annual turnover of US$ 25 billion while
total debt to the banks stands on US$ 1.5 billion, down from US$ 2.4 billion in
the eve of the crisis. The Ministry for Industry & Trade also assisted the
local diamond exporters by providing bank guarantees in total scope of
Overall in 2010,
export (net) of polished diamonds was US$ 5,832 million, representing 48%
increase from 2009 (when it noted 37% decrease from 2008, also much less than
In the 1st
quarter of 2011, 45.7% increase was noted comparing to the parallel period in
2010 with export of polished diamonds of US$2,123 million. Export of rough
diamonds also noted 39.6% rise, reaching US$ 1,158 million.
Import of rough
diamonds (net) in 2010 grew by 51% to US$ 3,755 million (30% rise in karat
terms) compared with 2009, and by 24.9% in 2011 1stQ (compared to
2010 1stQ), summing up to US$1,144 million. Import of polished diamonds (net)
saw 68% rise in 2010 reaching US$ 4,218 million (39% rise in karat terms), and
48.5% rise in 2011 1stQ (US$
1,234 million).
In terms of target
export (polished diamonds) countries, overall in 2010 the
In February 2009,
Notwithstanding
lack of updated data from subject’s officials, considered good for trade
engagements.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.44.38 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.73.88 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.65.83 |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable
factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of
interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with full
security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk and
to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.