![]()
MIRA INFORM REPORT
|
Report Date : |
26.05.2011 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
MAMASHI DIAMONDS |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
1 Jabotinsky Street, Diamond Exchange, Maccabi Bldg., Ramat Gan 52520 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Israel |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
10.04.1995 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
General
Partnership |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Traders, Importers, Marketers and Exporters of cut diamonds. |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
|
|
|
Payment
Behaviour : |
No Complaints |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made on
e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – March 31st, 2011
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.12.2010) |
Current Rating (31.03.2011) |
|
Israel |
a2 |
a2 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
MAMASHI DIAM
Telephone 972 3 612 71 36; 612 68
13
Cellular 972
54 397 72 91
Fax 972 3 612 71 36
1 Jabotinsky Street
Diamond Exchange, Maccabi Bldg.
RAMAT GAN 52520-ISRAEL
A general partnership,
registered as per file No. 54-018405-8 on the 10.04.1995.
1. Mordechai Shaltiel, 99%
2. Ms. Suzy Shaltiel, 1%.
Mordechai Shaltiel.
Traders, importers, marketers and exporters of cut diamonds.
40% of sales are export.
Operating from
rented office premises, on an area of 35 sq. meters, in 1 Jabotinsky Street,
Diamonds Exchange, Maccabi Building, Ramat Gan.
Having 5
employees (had 3 employees in 2010).
Financial data not forthcoming.
Sales figures not forthcoming.
Union Bank of Israel Ltd., Ramat Gan Branch (No. 062), Ramat Gan.
Nothing
unfavorable learned.
Subject's partner and General Manager, Mr. Mordechai Shaltiel, refused to disclose
financial data on his business.
This is a
relatively small business.
During 2010 and
2011 local diamond companies have been recovering from one of the worst
depressions in the global diamond sector due to the severe economic crisis in
global markets that erupted in September 2008. The diamond sector experienced
almost an entire freeze and collapse in sales of about 70% in the peak of the
crisis and 2009 export diamonds shrank by some 40%. Only since mid
According to the
President of the Israeli Diamonds Association, local diamond sector in general
managed to cross the crisis, despite the sheer difficulties, including the fact
that local banks contracted credit given to local diamond firms. The President
said that trade in the sector rolls annual turnover of US$ 25 billion while
total debt to the banks stands on US$ 1.5 billion, down from US$ 2.4 billion in
the eve of the crisis. The Ministry for Industry & Trade also assisted the
local diamond exporters by providing bank guarantees in total scope of NIS 1
billion.
Overall in 2010,
export (net) of polished diamonds was US$ 5,832 million, representing 48%
increase from 2009 (when it noted 37% decrease from 2008, also much less than
In the 1st
quarter of 2011, 45.7% increase was noted comparing to the parallel period in
2010 with export of polished diamonds of US$2,123 million. Export of rough
diamonds also noted 39.6% rise, reaching US$ 1,158 million.
Import of rough diamonds
(net) in 2010 grew by 51% to US$ 3,755 million (30% rise in karat terms)
compared with 2009, and by 24.9% in 2011 1stQ (compared to 2010
1stQ), summing up to US$1,144 million. Import of polished diamonds (net) saw
68% rise in 2010 reaching US$ 4,218 million (39% rise in karat terms), and
48.5% rise in 2011 1stQ (US$
1,234 million).
In terms of
target export (polished diamonds) countries, overall in 2010 the USA returned
to be main destination, with 41% of total export (45% in 2011 1stQ). This comes
after earlier in 2010, for the first time Far East markets became Israel’s
diamond industry’s main target, with sales to Hong Kong being close to these of
the USA, to whom sales decreased dramatically in view of the severe economic
crisis (traditionally sales to the USA comprised some 60%-65% of total export).
In 2010 and early 2011, export to Hong Kong comprised around 26% of sales.
Other main target countries include Belgium, India, Switzerland and China.
In February 2009,
Israel was ranked as the world’s largest exporter of cut diamonds, followed by
India, Belgium and South Africa.
Notwithstanding the refusal to disclose
financial details, considered good for trade engagements.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.45.38 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.73.31 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.63.70 |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest capability
for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
---- |
NB |
New Business |
---- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report.
The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any risk
and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL) or its
officials.