MIRA
INFORM REPORT
|
Report Date : |
03.09.2011 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
TONELLO SRL |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
Via Della Fisica 1-3 Sarcedo, 36030 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Italy |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2010 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
30.11.1983 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
01616900245 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Parent |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Manufacture of other special purpose machinery not elsewhere classified |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
No Complaints |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
-- |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – March 31st, 2011
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.12.2010) |
Current Rating (31.03.2011) |
|
Italy |
A2 |
A2 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
Company name and address
Tonello SRL
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business
Description
|
Tonello SRL is primarily engaged in manufacture of machinery for
working soft rubber or plastics or for the manufacture of products of these
materials (extruders, moulders, pneumatic tyre making or retreading machines
and other machines for making a specific rubber or plastic product);
manufacture of printing and bookbinding machines; manufacture of machinery
for producing tiles, bricks, shaped ceramic pastes, pipes, graphite
electrodes, blackboard chalk, foundry moulds, etc.; manufacture of moulding
boxes for any material; mould bases; moulding patterns; moulds; manufacture
of dryers for wood, paper pulp, paper or paperboard; manufacture of
centrifugal clothes dryers; manufacture of diverse special machinery and
equipment (machines to assemble electric or electronic lamps, tubes (valves)
or bulbs; machines for production or hot-working of glass or glassware, glass
fibre or yarn; machinery or apparatus for isotopic separation; rope-making
machinery, etc.); and manufacture of industrial robots for multiple uses. |
Industry
|
Industry |
Miscellaneous Capital Goods |
|
ANZSIC 2006: |
2499 - Other Machinery and Equipment
Manufacturing Not Elsewhere Classified |
|
NACE 2002: |
2956 - Manufacture of other special
purpose machinery not elsewhere classified |
|
NAICS 2002: |
333298 - All Other Industrial Machinery
Manufacturing |
|
UK SIC 2003: |
2956 - Manufacture of other special
purpose machinery not elsewhere classified |
|
US SIC 1987: |
3582 - Commercial Laundry, Drycleaning,
and Pressing Machines |
Key Executives
|
News
|
1 - Profit &
Loss Item Exchange Rate: USD 1 = EUR 0.7550783
2 - Balance Sheet Item Exchange Rate: USD 1 = EUR 0.7454064
Corporate Overview
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Structure News
|
Tonello SRL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Name |
Company Type |
Location |
Country |
Industry |
Sales |
Employees |
|
Parent |
Sarcedo, Vicenza |
Italy |
Miscellaneous Capital Goods |
18.4 |
68 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Fara Vicentino, Vicenza |
Italy |
Engineering Consultants |
7.8 |
8 |
Executives Report
|
|
|
Blood, sweat and gears: Veteran's rocky road to Paluma triumph
Townsville Bulletin (Australia): 25 July 2011
[What follows is the full text of the news story.]
IT wasn't just his
509 competitors Gary Purtell reckons he beat to the finish line at the Paluma
Push yesterday, it was Father Time as well.
In his sixth
attempt at the iconic mountain bike event, the 37-year-old Townsville rider
defied a stiff, sore, battered and bruised body to go one better than his
frustrating second placing in 2010.
While he remains
one of the most respected riders in North Queensland, a thrilled Purtell said
it felt like a now or never win.
``It's a big
relief because I'm getting older with every year, so it's getting harder,''
Purtell said with a laugh. ``I'm glad to get the win to get the monkey off the
back and tick that one off the list.''
Purtell (2 hours,
30 minutes, 56 seconds) won by just under three minutes from Nathan Stanford,
with Andrei Tonello in third place.
National mountain
bike marathon champion Jenni King (2 hrs 44mins) convincingly won the women's
event, with Samantha Hemsley second and Louretta Howarth third.
Despite the
relative comfort of Purtell's win, there was nothing easy about it. He overcame
an early high-speed fall that not only left him bruised and bleeding but
dropped him from the lead back to the pack.
But he got a bit
of luck as well.
With about 15km of
the 60km race left, leader Nelson Tilley had mechanical troubles that ended his
race and Purtell took advantage.
``(Tilley) was
riding very well too, but that's the thing about mountain biking, anything can
happen,'' Purtell said.
``You can get a
stick jammed in your wheel or fall off or whatever, so it's never over until
you get to the finish line, that's for sure.''
The 510 entrants
was a record by 68, with competitors ranging in age from 11 to 67 and coming
from around North Queensland and as far away as Melbourne, Canberra and
Tasmania.
antony.stewart@townsvillebulletin.com.au
Australia: Mirko
Tonello and Gino Tonello Receive Patent for 'Method for interconnecting
electric cables'
Australian Government: 06 July 2011
[What follows is the full text of the news story.]
Australia, July 6
-- Mirko Tonello and Gino Tonello, both of Italy, have filed an application
(2006324121) on Oct. 31, 2006, for 'Method for interconnecting electric
cables.'
The patent is
effective from Oct. 31, 2006, till Oct. 31, 2026.
Inventor(s): Mirko
Tonello and Gino Tonello
Application
Status: Accepted
Acceptance Date:
June 15
Paid to Date: Oct.
31
The original document can be viewed at:
http://pericles.ipaustralia.gov.au/ols/auspat/applicationDetails.do?applicationNo=2006324121
For any query with
respect to this article or any other content requirement, please contact Editor
at htsyndication@hindustantimes.com
Tonello brothers
genuine chances
Cairns Post: 11 June 2011
[What follows is the full text of the news story.]
THE four stage
Tour de Tableland begins today around Tinaroo, Kairi and Tolga and local
products Isaac and Andre Tonello will start as genuine chances to take it out.
The Mareeba
brothers are in great form, but will be tested by young talents from Townsville
and Brisbane in an event that holds weight on the country's cycling calendar.
Cairns Cycling
Club committee member Richie Bates said the pair should consider themselves a
realistic chance of winning the race, despite it being a long time between
drinks for a local victor.
"They're up
there, but it's been a while," he said.
Past winners
include local boy and Team Lotto rider Adam Hansen and team pursuit World
Championship winner Ashley Hutchinson.
"It'd be
great for a local to win it and there's been plenty of winners that have gone
on to big things," he said. "The race has a good name, attracts good
riders and is a real stepping stone."
The Tableland
event starts this afternoon with an 87km stage - slightly longer than in the
past - with sprint points up for grabs throughout the journey.
The 81km stage
tomorrow takes in Yungaburra, Kureen and Peeramon, before a 5km individual time
trial is held in the afternoon. Monday's final 120km stage winds between
Eacham, Malanda, Kureen and Atherton.
B, C and D grade
riders will also compete over varying distances.
The tour was the
brainchild of Bevan and Dawn Nash and has been raced since 1997.
RRR Mountain bike
challenge 70km event Total finishers: 84 Men: 77 Women: 7 Average time:
03:07:24 Fastest time: 02:09:46 Slowest time: 04:24:13
Cairns Post: 08 June 2011
[What follows is the full text of the news story.]
Rrr 70km Event
Andrew Fellows
02:09:46, Ty Cerlenizza 02:18:12, Dominic Hoyal 02:18:12, Nelson Tilley
02:23:04, Andrei Tonello 02:25:48, Steve Rankine 02:27:20, Nathan Sandford
02:28:57, Christopher Florence 02:32:51, Steve Petre 02:34:15, David Wood
02:34:51, Scott Mclennan 02:35:50, Paul Mashford 02:37:16, Ross March 02:37:46,
Mark Allen 02:38:20, Jason Vaughan 02:39:22, Gavin Taylor 02:39:26, Mark
Knowles 02:39:29, Salvatore Parenti 02:39:35, David Eakin 02:40:57, Warren Pike
02:43:41, Hamish Guy 02:44:41, Frank Mcgoldrick 02:45:24, Brendon Skerke
02:45:25, Abby Mclennan 02:47:45, James Bourke 02:47:45, Timothy Storer
02:48:05, Shaun Stevenson 02:49:49, Robert Waters 02:51:20, Rodney Young
02:51:38, Tim Benfield 02:55:29, Jason Gurr 02:56:09, Michael Mehonoshen
02:57:07, Peter Gibson 02:58:07, Joshua Rayner 02:58:49, James Hall 03:00:14,
Rob Saunders 03:01:50, Lauretta Howarth 03:02:49, Alan Clarke 03:02:49, Brett
Welch 03:03:38, Tris Kearns 03:04:58, Timothy O'dwyer 03:05:00, MicHael Hibble
03:05:47, Derek Desaunois 03:06:12, Jason Hussey 03:06:18, John O'reilly
03:08:32, Stephen Barkworth 03:09:44, Tim Binns 03:10:51, Ken Oswald 03:11:42,
Mike Thurtell 03:12:26, Andy Taylor 03:12:55, Craig Pearson 03:13:08, Sarah
Hoyal 03:19:17, Frank Falappi 03:19:29, David Shepherd 03:20:29, Malcolm
Barrett 03:20:51, Patrick Kinsella 03:25:13, Ben Kaesehagen 03:25:28, Greg
Mclindon 03:25:32, Sean Newell 03:28:47, Terry Thompson 03:30:17, Stephen Gadd
03:30:31, Tony Pappas 03:31:06, John Wiren 03:32:18, Fiona Powell 03:33:54,
Dave Cuming 03:34:44, Stephen Kilpatrick 03:35:48, Raymond Wright 03:35:48,
Martin Brennan 03:36:03, Christine Keir 03:37:17, Mark Trevor 03:42:19, Simon
Frost 03:43:35, Rebecca Hill 03:47:19, Shaun Barclay 03:47:24, Paul Taylor
03:51:08, Peter Mcnally 03:56:53, Patrick Sutton 03:56:57, Kathy Hill 04:00:57,
Kerry Hardy 04:08:21, Ian Kruger 04:08:21, Brice Ruellan 04:24:13.
Rrr 40km Event
Jonathan Standage
01:24:20, Kent James 01:25:09, Julian Oates 01:25:45, Peter Bridgewater
01:25:49, Rudi De Faveri 01:29:45, Douglas McCallum 01:29:47, Matthew Roberts
01:32:24, Andrew Graham 01:32:31, Perry Turner 01:32:53, Craig Judd 01:33:05,
Malcolm Lindsay 01:33:18, David Prete 01:33:19, Matthew Greenwood 01:34:08, Rod
Tindale 01:34:21, Stephen Salleras 01:34:37, Drewe Burgess 01:35:23, Ashley
Greenwood 01:36:33, Dylan Atkinson 01:37:06, Jay Schesser 01:37:37, Gavin Scott
01:37:47, Daniel Gossert 01:37:50, Lincoln Carolan 01:37:52, Owen Caddick-King
01:38:02, Craig Jensen 01:38:08, Paul Hunter 01:38:08, Ross Strooper 01:38:22,
James Tee 01:39:20, Scott Young 01:39:45, Stephen Lauder 01:39:52, Stuart
Macdonald 01:40:26, Mike Johnston 01:40:54, Craig Mewett 01:41:04, Mark Ridge
01:41:08, Colin Gilbert 01:41:46, Wes Bielski 01:41:49, Greg Hutton 01:42:31,
Jason Berther 01:42:48, Matthew Salmon 01:42:48, Dale Caulfield 01:42:48,
Thomas Stanton 01:43:06, David Cavanagh 01:43:22, Michael Norman 01:43:30,
CharlTon Best 01:43:35, Simon Corbett-Jarvis 01:43:54, Derryn Richardson
01:44:07, Luke Croker 01:44:18, Alex Farkas 01:44:24, Ray Sterrett 01:44:46,
Keith Sharland 01:45:04, Jeffrey Green 01:45:14, Daniel Webb 01:45:16, Russell
Moseley 01:45:18, Steve Sandilant 01:45:20, Nathan White 01:45:57, Bill Handebo
01:46:32, Warren Fraser 01:46:33, Adrian Dawson 01:46:42, Murray Anderson-Clemence
01:46:48, Nik Marhin 01:47:38, Jeffrey Gloger 01:48:01, Gavin Hardy 01:48:15,
Alexander Tilley 01:48:37, John Baker 01:48:39, Haydn Tilley 01:48:41,
Josephine Zammit 01:49:01, Christopher Borsato 01:49:01, Bret Piccone 01:49:15,
Nicholas Verhoeven 01:49:19, John Dickinson 01:50:30, Logan Smith 01:50:30,
Danny Fuller 01:50:37, Ivonne Nathan 01:50:40, Bruce Monds 01:50:59, Shawn
Perera 01:51:01, Beau Lynd 01:51:15, Drew White 01:51:16, John Koerner
01:51:42, Stephen Hawke 01:52:02, Nathan Ivey 01:52:08, Nick Stefanidis
01:52:12, Mark Kosky 01:52:17, David Crea 01:52:19, Lucas Mcdonald 01:52:26,
Jeff Walter 01:52:26, Sean Mcmanus 01:52:48, Donal Watters 01:52:51, Philip
Jumeau 01:53:08, Alan Hurst 01:53:38, Kees Krul 01:53:40, Brad Jones 01:53:41, Cameron
Jones 01:53:41, Aaron Eastment 01:53:52, Steven Davies 01:54:05, Anita Narula
01:54:20, David Wilesmith 01:54:31, Graham Moroney 01:54:47, Thorstein Stovell
01:55:00, Lhiam Croft 01:55:00, Adam Jones 01:55:03, Roger Thomas 01:55:21,
Joshua Hyde 01:55:22, Christian Oppermann 01:55:30, John Griffiths 01:55:49,
Craig Nissen 01:56:01, Benjamin Hannah 01:56:02, Ian Grimmett 01:56:06, Sarah
Kaehler 01:56:17, Stephen Brady 01:56:18, Elliott Kells 01:56:20, Kirsten
Standage 01:56:59, Craig Overend 01:57:00, Brandon Petrie 01:57:02, Will
Marnane 01:57:03, Cameron Taylor 01:57:04, Robert Stevenson 01:57:11, Leanne
Skerke 01:57:15, Rod Ashton 01:57:26, Dion Green 01:58:14, Robert Borzi
01:58:20, Danny Mildren 01:58:21, Paul Stevens 01:58:28, Adam Gowlett 01:58:43,
Reilly Hurst 01:58:43, Jean Macdonald 01:59:25, Ian Hodges 01:59:26, Cameron
Lebherz 01:59:45, Clifton Timmins 02:00:21, Daniel
MatthewS 02:00:33,
Llew Davies 02:00:38, Kane Murray 02:00:52, Chris Spargo 02:00:55, Jerrie
Hutchison 02:01:33, Ian Hutchison 02:01:33, Morgan Dacre 02:01:39, Sam Hodges
02:01:45, Geoffrey Jordan 02:01:47, Anthony Croke 02:01:48, Nic Morris
02:01:57, Shane Dempster 02:02:08, Richard Young 02:02:19, Brad Kellas
02:02:21, Natalie Mcnamee 02:02:29, Joshua Guernier 02:02:45, Martin Sher
02:02:46, Warrick Mattinson 02:02:54, Megan Trickey 02:02:55, Steven Curtis
02:02:58, Michael Blom 02:04:10, Neil Gregory 02:04:10, Renee Lees 02:04:42,
Jacob Croker 02:04:44, Aaron Young 02:04:52, Max Gerrard 02:05:56, Todd Gerrard
02:05:57, Will Hancock 02:06:08, Jared Boots 02:06:10, Scott Smith 02:06:31,
Geoffrey Apps 02:06:34, Sarah Carter 02:06:36, Peter Dalziel 02:06:58, Sid
Scott 02:07:08, Daniel Handley 02:07:24, Ian Rooke 02:07:38, Scott Davis
02:07:38, Cameron Finter 02:08:00, Sam Harrop 02:08:04, Rod Armstrong 02:08:13,
Mick Giudice 02:08:52, Anthony Archie 02:09:06, Peter Stock 02:09:23, Luciano
Leonforte 02:09:51, Marco KiEfer 02:09:59, Fred Fabris 02:10:02, Glen Fullerton
02:10:08, Anthony Renwick 02:10:30, Lone Pearce 02:11:43, Robert Harley
02:12:11, Melissa Gloger 02:13:34, Kylie Jones 02:13:43, Paul Bennett 02:15:11,
Charlene Dymond 02:15:12, Chris Reid 02:15:41, Beth Downing 02:15:47, Alasdair
Reid 02:15:47, Stacey Morris 02:15:49, Linda Cracknell 02:15:50, Tod Walker
02:16:04, Terry Geddes 02:16:10, Brett Tilley 02:16:18, Dan Oconnor 02:16:19,
Jenny Bradley 02:17:26, Sam Buchanan 02:17:39, Stephen Nutt 02:17:57, Tamara
PEtre 02:19:27, Jeremy Kingsford 02:19:38, Brandon Cole 02:19:44, Shaun
Mcgoldrick 02:19:48, Roger Cumming 02:20:17, Kevin Clarke 02:20:17, David
Cumming 02:20:17, James Holmes 02:21:44, Tim Larsen 02:21:52, Sarah Yates
02:22:08, John Hawkes 02:22:15, Eugene Mcneilly 02:22:19, Jeff Ryan 02:23:53,
Mattias Bomford-Wind 02:24:11, Tim Wainwright 02:24:21, Jack Marturia 02:25:19,
Kane Johnson 02:26:28, Matthew Coburn 02:26:50, Alanna Diprose 02:26:50,
Gabrielle Mcguigan 02:27:38, Phillip Gregory Jetnikoff 02:28:22, Stewart Prince
02:28:31, Brad Shannon 02:28:32, Paul Garland 02:28:32, Jay Marron 02:28:32,
Darran Shannon 02:28:33, Lisa Perrett 02:28:43, Leanne Kruger 02:29:05,
Christopher Watters 02:29:52, Carmen Dalladay 02:29:58, Russell Keir 02:31:05,
Eva Stuer 02:31:35, Eleanor Jones 02:31:39, Matt Mckinley 02:31:44, Jennifer
Mcmanus 02:33:08, Pat Kirby 02:35:55, Paul Penhaligon 02:38:21, Ned Dibella
02:38:38, Gunter Stern 02:38:48, Chris Boland 02:39:32, Thomas Gersekowski
02:39:40, Betty-Ann Griffiths 02:41:28, Chris Mattinson 02:44:39, Simon Knight
02:52:09, Mick White 02:53:47, Peter Tuck 02:54:25, Peter Johnston 02:54:25,
Carl Bishop 03:00:21, Larry Lanza 03:03:27, Stacey Pickert 03:03:27, Donnie
Harris 03:13:42, Megan Harris 03:13:43, Jordan O'brien 03:18:16, Brett King
03:18:17, Jack Richardson 03:18:17, Catherine Eupene 03:27:29, Rosemary Doole
03:30:01, Jeanette Powell 03:30:02,
Survey of U.S.
Public Companies Sheds Light on Corporate Aid to Japan
The Conference Board
China Weekly News: 11 May 2011
[What follows is the full text of the news story.]
The Conference
Board released findings from a survey on contributions by U.S. public companies
to relief efforts in Japan.
"The recent
crisis in Japan has resulted in an outpouring of support from citizens and
corporations around the world," said Matteo Tonello, Research Director of
Corporate Leadership at The Conference Board. "Numerous relief programs
have been established to provide conduits for distributing the money, goods and
services that the people of Japan will need to survive and recover from these
natural disasters. This survey was conducted to assess the forms and extent to
which the corporate community in the United States is contributing to this
effort."
The survey --
which supplements The Conference Board's annual research on corporate
contributions -- was disseminated to U.S.-listed companies and conducted online
from April 11 to April 20, 2011. Participating companies were asked to report
contribution amounts committed as of the date in which the survey was filled
out. A total of 83 U.S.-listed companies participated in the study. A final
report based on the survey findings will be published in the coming weeks.
Survey of U.S.
Public Companies Sheds Light on Corporate Aid to Japan
Majority of Companies Have Instituted Programs to Support Relief Efforts
Manufacturing Firms are Most Generous Contributors, with Average Donation of
PR Newswire US: 04 May 2011
[What follows is the full text of the news story.]
NEW YORK, May 4,
2011 /PRNewswire/ -- The Conference Board released today findings from a survey
on contributions by U.S. public companies to relief efforts in Japan.
"The recent
crisis in Japan has resulted in an outpouring of support from citizens and
corporations around the world," said Matteo Tonello, Research Director of
Corporate Leadership at The Conference Board. "Numerous relief programs
have been established to provide conduits for distributing the money, goods and
services that the people of Japan will need to survive and recover from these
natural disasters. This survey was conducted to assess the forms and extent to
which the corporate community in the United States is contributing to this
effort."
The survey --
which supplements The Conference Board's annual research on corporate
contributions -- was disseminated to U.S.-listed companies and conducted online
from April 11 to April 20, 2011. Participating companies were asked to report
contribution amounts committed as of the date in which the survey was filled
out. A total of 83 U.S.-listed companies participated in the study. A final
report based on the survey findings will be published in the coming weeks.
The following are
the key survey findings:
Corporate aid
program
Across industries
and size groups (measured by annual corporate revenue), a large majority of
survey participants reported instituting some type of program to support relief
efforts in Japan. The manufacturing industry reports the highest percentage of
such programs: 95.2 percent, compared with 87.5 percent in financial services
and 79.2 percent in other (non-financial) services.
Total
contributions
Manufacturing
companies are the most generous contributors to Japan relief programs, with an
average donation per company of $807,555 and a 75th percentile as high as
$1,200,000. When analyzed by company size, the average aggregate value of
per-company contributions to Japan relief programs varies from $136,719 for
smaller companies to $2,134,130 for those with annual revenue of $20 billion
and more.
Contribution type
The largest
majority of reported corporate contributions to Japan relief efforts are in
cash.In the manufacturing industry, in particular, this is the case for 89.6
percent of total contributions to Japan, whereas non-financial services
companies report that 19.6 percent of their contributions to the same relief
programs are in the form of company products or services (compared with 7.8
percent in manufacturing and 2.5 in financial services). Across industries and
size groups, no company reported in-kind contribution in the form of lending
its employee expertise to the relief efforts.
Relationship with
Japanese market
Manufacturing
companies reported the strongest relationship with the Japanese market, because
of: their existing business operations in Japan (69.8 percent of survey
participants); their dependence on imports from Japan (30.2 percent); or the
fact that Japan is a key customer base (41.9 percent). The type of relationship
varies significantly according to size groups, with the largest companies
reporting the closest ties with the Japanese market, primarily due to their
business operations (72 percent) and their customer base (40 percent).
Contribution
recipients
The survey
inquired on the means through which companies are funneling their contributions
to Japan -- whether through Japanese or international relief agencies, directly
through company employees based in Japan, or other forms. Across size groups
and industries, a large majority of companies use their contributions to
support international relief agencies (65.2 percent of the smallest surveyed
companies and as many as 84 percent of the largest). The largest companies are
those more inclined to rely on the relief initiatives of their employees based
in Japan (36 percent, compared with 8.7 percent of the smallest surveyed
companies). The manufacturing industry is the one that, presumably due to its
closest ties with the country, adopts the most diversified approach and uses a
combination of Japanese and international agencies, employee-driven
initiatives, and other forms of assistance.
Contribution
timeframe
Participating
companies were also asked to indicate whether they plan to award (or have
already awarded) the contributions as a lump sum or wait for more information
regarding the evolution of the situation in Japan to better identify the real
areas of need. The survey showed that, across industries and size groups,
companies have been more inclined to act swiftly. The largest percentage of
companies that have committed resources but intend to wait for higher awareness
of the actual needs before deciding on the allocation is in (non-financial)
services (26.3 percent) and in the largest size group (33.3 percent).
Employee-matching
programs
As part of their
contributions to Japan, most companies have also instituted a program to match
donations made by employees to relief initiatives of their choice. The percentage
of companies that offer a matching program ranges from 66.7 in non-financial
services to 71.4 in financial services and from 64.7 for the smallest companies
to 73.3 for those with annual revenue between $5 billion and $20 billion.
Collaboration with
other companies
Perhaps due to the
nature of the emergency and the need for a prompt response, most companies are
not engaging with their peers in a joint relief effort: only 7.7 percent of the
manufacturing companies and 3.3 percent of those with annual revenue between $5
billion and $20 billion indicated that they are partnering or collaborating
with other business corporations to increase the value or effects of their
contributions.
Impact on
corporate giving program
The majority of
companies reported establishing a separate emergency fund, with no impact on
the regular contribution program: this is the case for 84.6 percent of
financial services firms and 84 percent of the largest surveyed companies. Of
those companies that indicated that the Japan relief contributions required a
re-allocation of previously budgeted contribution resources, an ample majority
across the smallest revenue groups and the group comprising companies with
annual revenue between $5 billion and $20 billion reported an only minimal
impact on that budget.
About The
Conference Board
The Conference
Board is a global, independent business membershipand research association
working in the public interest. Our mission is unique: To provide the world's
leading organizationswith the practical knowledge they need to improve their
performance and better serve society. The Conference Board is a
non-advocacy, not-for-profit entity holding 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status in the
United States.
www.conference-board.org
Follow The
Conference Board
Twitter | Facebook
| LinkedIn
SOURCE The
Conference Board
WA artists go
online to show work
Midland-Kalamunda Reporter: 08 February 2011
[What follows is the full text of the news story.]
A SHOWCASE of WA
visual artists is being launched at Polytechnic Wests Junction Gallery in
Midland tomorrow. Seven artists will have their short films uploaded to a new
website to expose their art to the world.
Artist Patrizia
Tonello and 3D animator and web designer Graham Taylor established the Hollow
City Chronicles, which is a purpose-built website funded by the Department of
Culture and the Arts.
Its our dream to
have this site become a permanent part of the WA arts landscape, Ms Tonello
said.
Theres a lot of
fascinating art being produced here, and we need to encourage artists to think
beyond the gallery space and utilise the power of the internet.
Stuart Elliott,
Peter Dailey, Amanda Williams, Richard Heath and Merrick Belyea contributed
short films which can be seen at hollowcitychronicles.com after February 9.
Tradition of
people helping people
Niagara This Week: 19 November 2010
[What follows is the full text of the news story.]
It's about people
helping people achieve and it's been a strong tradition for 10 years.
People Helping
People Achieve recently celebrated its 10th anniversary in Port Colborne. Now a
program organized Community Living of Port Colborne/Wainfleet, PHPA is a
self-advocate group for people with a disability which responds to issues,
concerns and strategies which are addressed in the community.
PHPA began 10
years ago with the assistance of Welland's People First organization. The
program provides members and speakers to share their experiences and expertise
on various topics to help the community thrive.
Dan Tonello, chair
of PHPA, said the group talks about issues which affect its members and their
contributions to the community.
"We related
it to our members' experiences," Tonello said of the discussions.
"For instance we discussed the changing cost of generic drugs at
pharmacies and how it impacts our members. We want to ensure our members have
the same freedom and rights as everyone else (in society). When people know
their rights they're less likely to be abused. The rights all Canadians have
are privacy, the right to say no and right to liberty and equality. We want to
make sure (people with disabilities) have rights as well."
The PHPA
celebrated its 10th anniversary with an open house at Community Living Nov. 16
by allowing visitors a chance to see what the program is all about. Tonello
said not a lot of people knows they exist in Port Colborne so it's always a
good thing to get the word out there.
"We want to
educate the community," Tonello said of the programs, which includes its
annual March for Inclusion every May.
For more information
on PHPA call 905-835-8941 ext. 175.
|
|
|
FRANCE : Tonello ingenieurs conseils SAS bags contract for providing
civil engineering support services
TendersInfo News
05 March 2011
|
[What follows is
the full text of the article.] Ville d'Annecy,
France has issued the contract of 10 800 Euros to Tonello ingenieurs conseils
SAS, France for providing civil engineering support services. Initial
estimated total value of the contract was 12 000 EUR and the final contract
award value was 10 800 EUR, excluding VAT. The award criteria are the most
economically advantageous tender in terms of Amount of remuneration;
Resources and skills; Quality of references provided and Turnaround. Total 2 bidders
showed their interest by bidding for this contract. The tendering authority
did not followed electronic auction process for selecting the bidder. The
contracting authority is not purchasing on behalf of other contracting
authorities. The procedure
through which this contract is awarded is open. The contract is not covered
by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) and will not be sub-contracted
to third party. Copyright 2011
Euclid Infotech Pvt. Ltd., distributed by Contify.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
|
Period Length |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
|
Filed Currency |
EUR |
EUR |
EUR |
|
Exchange Rate
(Period Average) |
0.755078 |
0.719047 |
0.683679 |
|
Consolidated |
No |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income |
18.5 |
17.1 |
18.4 |
|
Net sales |
18.4 |
16.9 |
18.2 |
|
Other operating income |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
|
Raw materials and consumables employed |
9.0 |
7.8 |
8.9 |
|
Other expenses |
4.6 |
4.1 |
4.4 |
|
Total payroll costs |
4.1 |
4.1 |
4.5 |
|
Fixed asset depreciation and amortisation |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
|
Other operating costs |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Net operating income |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
|
Total financial income |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
Total expenses |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Profit before tax |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
|
Profit after extraordinary items and before tax |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
|
Total taxation |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
Net profit |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
Annual Balance
Sheet |
|
Financials in: USD
(mil) |
|
|
|
|
|
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
|
Filed Currency |
EUR |
EUR |
EUR |
|
Exchange Rate |
0.745406 |
0.696986 |
0.719399 |
|
Consolidated |
No |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
12.3 |
13.1 |
12.2 |
|
Provision for risks |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
|
Provision for pensions |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
|
Mortgages and loans |
5.0 |
3.2 |
- |
|
Trade creditors |
4.9 |
5.9 |
6.0 |
|
Bank loans and overdrafts |
1.2 |
0.8 |
- |
|
Other current liabilities |
2.3 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
|
Accruals and deferred income |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total current liabilities |
8.5 |
8.2 |
7.5 |
|
Total liabilities (including net worth) |
26.7 |
25.5 |
20.7 |
|
Intangibles |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
Buildings |
0.2 |
0.2 |
- |
|
Total tangible fixed assets |
1.7 |
2.1 |
2.6 |
|
Long-term investments |
2.2 |
2.2 |
0.8 |
|
Total financial assets |
6.2 |
2.7 |
0.8 |
|
Receivables due after 1 year |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Loans to associated companies |
3.9 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
|
Total non-current assets |
8.0 |
4.8 |
3.5 |
|
Finished goods |
3.4 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
|
Net stocks and work in progress |
9.4 |
9.1 |
8.9 |
|
Trade debtors |
5.9 |
8.3 |
6.0 |
|
Other receivables |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
|
Cash and liquid assets |
2.3 |
2.1 |
1.0 |
|
Accruals |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
Total current assets |
18.8 |
20.7 |
17.2 |
|
Total assets |
26.7 |
25.5 |
20.7 |
|
|
|
Annual Ratios |
|
Financials in:
USD (mil) |
|
|
|
|
|
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
|
Period Length |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
|
Filed Currency |
EUR |
EUR |
EUR |
|
Exchange Rate |
0.745406 |
0.696986 |
0.719399 |
|
Consolidated |
No |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales per employee |
0.39 |
0.33 |
0.34 |
|
Profit per employee |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
|
Average wage per employee |
0.09 |
0.08 |
0.08 |
|
Net worth |
12.3 |
13.1 |
12.2 |
|
Number of employees |
68 |
71 |
70 |
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.45.89 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.74.31 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.65.41 |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.