MIRA INFORM REPORT
|
Report Date : |
03.04.2012 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
ARIE PIENICA SONS LTD. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
|
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
04.09.2008 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Dealers,
Processors, Importers, Exporters and marketers
of diamonds |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees
: |
Not Available |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ca |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
|
|
|
Payment
Behaviour : |
Unknown |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES:
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – September 30th, 2011
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (30.06.2011) |
Current Rating (30.09.2011) |
|
Israel |
a2 |
a2 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
ARIE PIENICA SONS LTD.
Telephone 972 3 575 18 01
Fax 972 3 575 53 22
21 Tuval Street
Diamond Exchange, Yahalom Bldg.
RAMAT GAN-5252236-ISRAEL
A private limited
company, incorporated as per file No. 51-418265-8 on the 04.09.2008.
Authorized share
capital of NIS 30,000.00, divided into:-
30,000 ordinary shares of NIS 1.00
each,
of which 100 shares amounting to NIS 100.00
were issued.
1. Dor
Pienica, 50%,
2. Roy
Pienica, 50%.
1. Dor
Pienica,
2. Roy
Pienica.
Dealers, processors,
importers, exporters and marketers of diamonds.
Operating from
office premises, in 21 Tuval Street (also referred to as 54 Bezalel Street),
Diamond Exchange, Yahalom Building, Ramat Gan.
Number of
employees not forthcoming.
Financial data not
forthcoming.
There are 2
charges for unlimited amounts registered on the company's assets (financial and
other assets), in favor of Union Bank of Israel Ltd. (both charges placed in
2008).
Import of cut
diamonds in 2011 summed up to US$ 5,682 million, representing 34.7% increase
comparing to 2010
(18% rise in karat
terms), while import of rough diamonds rose by 17.5% from 2010, totaling US$
4,413 million (11% fall in karat terms).
In 2010, export (net)
of cut diamonds was US$ 5,832 million (up 48% from 2009, when it noted 37%
decrease from 2008), rough diamonds export (net) reached US$ 3,060 million (62%
rise from 2009). Import of rough diamonds (net) in 2010 grew by 51% to US$
3,755 compared with 2009, and import of polished diamonds (net) saw 68% rise in
2010 reaching US$ 4,218 million.
In terms of target
export (polished diamonds) countries, in 2011 the USA continued to be the main
destination, with 39% of total export (41% in 2011). This comes after in early
2010, for the first time Far East markets became Israel’s diamond industry’s
main target (traditionally sales to the USA comprised some 60%-65% of total
export). Hong Kong is the 2nd largest target country, comprising 26%
of sales in 2011 (29% in 2010). Other main target countries included
Switzerland (6%), India (5%), UK (3%) and the rest of the World (21%).
According to the
President of the Israeli Diamonds Association, local diamond sector in general
managed to cross one of worst depressions in the global diamond sector caused
by the global economic crisis in 2008/9. The sector experienced almost an
entire freeze and collapse in sales of about 70% in the peak of the crisis and
2009 export diamonds shrank by some 40%. The President said that trade in the
sector rolls annual turnover of US$ 25 billion while total debt to the banks
stands on US$ 1.5 billion, down from US$ 2.4 billion in the eve of the crisis.
The Ministry for Industry & Trade also assisted the local diamond exporters
by providing bank guarantees in total scope of NIS 1 billion.
Local diamond
sector employs some 15,000 persons.
In February 2009,
Israel was ranked as the world’s largest exporter of cut diamonds, followed by
India, Belgium and South Africa.
Considering the
refusal to disclose data, dealings are recommended on secured basis.
Note: Since the beginning of 2012 Israel Post
started using a new area code method of 7 digits (the old method of 5 digits
will still be valid till end of 2012).
DIAMOND INDUSTRY –
INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world as the birthplace
for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of diamonds but history
says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in India. Diamond
production in India can be traced back to almost 8th Century B.C.
India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th Century
when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of S.
Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was possible only due to
combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian workforce and the
untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires, supported by
progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses derives its
importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations which operate
in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business enterprises include
spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction costs, small,
nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage and
philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on many fronts including
higher standard of corporate governance, long-term performance – focused
strategies, modern management and technology.
-
The diamond jewellery industry in India today may be more than Rs 60000
mil and is rated amongst the fastest growing in the world. Indi ranks
third in the world in domestic diamond consumption.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with some medium and
large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious import – export,
inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In the process,
several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees. They mostly
diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and capital
markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th October 2010 is as
under –
DIAMOND SAGA – DIRTY DOZEN STUCK WITH 2K CR DEBT
This could be the biggest credibility crisis
the Indian diamond industry has ever faced. Fifteen banks run the risk of
losing Rs 2000 crore lent to a dozen diamond firms in Surat. Until about two
months ago, they had not repaid these dues. Bankers believe many
diamantaires borrowed money during the economic downturn two years ago and
diverted funds to businesses like real estate and capital markets. Many of
themselves made money from these businesses but their diamond companies have
gone sick and declared insolvency.
-
Most of the money borrowed from the banks in the name of their diamond
business has been diverted in real estate and the share market. The banks are
not in a position to seize their properties because in many cases, these were
purchased in the name of their relatives and friends.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.51.16 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.81.79 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.68.34 |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit transaction.
It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest and
principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable
factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of
interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with full
security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
---- |
NB |
New Business |
---- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk and
to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.