|
Report Date : |
18.12.2012 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
CIEN CO., LTD. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
16, 18 Soi Silom
13 [Vaidee], Silom Road, Silom, Bangrak,
Bangkok 10500 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Thailand |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2011 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
02.03.2007 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
0105550024844 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Manufacturer and exporter of fine cutting diamonds and precious stones |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
60 employees |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
No complaints |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES:
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – June 30th, 2012
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.03.2012) |
Current Rating (30.06.2012) |
|
Thailand |
B1 |
B1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
thailand - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
With a well-developed infrastructure, a free-enterprise economy, generally pro-investment policies, and strong export industries, Thailand enjoyed solid growth from 2000 to 2007 - averaging more than 4% per year - as it recovered from the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98. Thai exports - mostly machinery and electronic components, agricultural commodities, and jewelry - continue to drive the economy, accounting for more than half of GDP. The global financial crisis of 2008-09 severely cut Thailand's exports, with most sectors experiencing double-digit drops. In 2009, the economy contracted 2.3%. In 2010, Thailand's economy expanded 7.8%, its fastest pace since 1995, as exports rebounded from their depressed 2009 level. Steady economic growth at just below 4% during the first three quarters of 2011 was interrupted by historic flooding in October and November in the industrial areas north of Bangkok, crippling the manufacturing sector and leading to a revised growth rate of only 0.1% for the year. The industrial sector is poised to recover from the second quarter of 2012 onward, however, and the government anticipates the economy will probably grow between 5.5 and 6.5% for 2012, while private sector forecasts range between 3.8% and 5.7%.
|
Source : CIA |
CIEN CO., LTD.
BUSINESS
ADDRESS : 16, 18 SOI
SILOM 13 [VAIDEE], SILOM
ROAD,
SILOM, BANGRAK,
BANGKOK 10500
TELEPHONE : [66] 2233-9388
FAX :
[66] 2635-1390
E-MAIL
ADDRESS : sale@ciengems.com
REGISTRATION
ADDRESS : SAME
AS BUSINESS ADDRESS
ESTABLISHED
: 2007
REGISTRATION
NO. : 0105550024844
TAX
ID NO. : 3032551731
CAPITAL REGISTERED : BHT. 4,000,000
CAPITAL PAID-UP : BHT.
4,000,000
SHAREHOLDER’S PROPORTION : THAI : 100%
FISCAL YEAR CLOSING DATE : DECEMBER 31
LEGAL
STATUS : PRIVATE LIMITED
COMPANY
EXECUTIVE : MR. THANASAK SUBHIRANKUL,
THAI
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.
OF STAFF : 60
LINES
OF BUSINESS : FINE CUTTING DIAMONDS AND
PRECIOUS
STONES
MANUFACTURER AND
EXPORTER
OPERATING
TREND : STABLE
PRESENT
SITUATION : OPERATING NORMALLY
REPUTATION : FAIR
WITH NORMAL BUSINESS
ENGAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
STANDARD : MANAGEMENT WITH
FAIR PERFORMANCE
The
subject was established
on March 2,
2007 as a
private limited company
under the registered name CIEN
CO., LTD. by Thai groups, Its business objective is to manufacture
and service fine
cutting diamonds and
precious stones for
export. It currently
employs approximate 60
staff.
The
subject’s registered address
is 16, 18 Soi
Silom 13 [Vaidee], Silom
Rd., Silom, Bangrak,
Bangkok 10500, and
this is the
subject’s current operation
address.
|
Name |
|
Nationality |
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Thanasak Subhirankul |
|
Thai |
39 |
|
Mr. Narongkoch Kompasakorn |
|
Thai |
28 |
One of the
above directors can
sign on behalf
of the subject
with company’s affixed.
Mr. Thanasak Subhirankul is the Managing
Director.
He is Thai
nationality with the
age of 39
years old.
The subject
is engaged in
manufacturing and provide
servicing various kinds
of fine cutting
diamonds and precious
stones, with customer’s
design for wrist watch and
jewelry production industry.
PURCHASE
Most
of diamonds and
precious stones for the
production are imported
from India, Hong
Kong, Switzerland and
U.S.A., the remaining,
as well as cutting tools
is purchased from
local suppliers.
EXPORT
100% of the
products is sold
and serviced to
oversea customer, mainly
in U.S.A., Switzerland
and Hong Kong.
SUBSIDIARY AND AFFILIATED
COMPANY
Sesto Senso Co.,
Ltd.
Business Type :
Manufacturer and distributor
of jewelry products
LITIGATION
Bankruptcy and
Receivership
There are no
litigation on bankruptcy
and receivership cases
filed against the
subject found at
Legal Execution Department
for the past
five years.
Others
There are no
legal suits filed
against the subject
for the past
two years.
CREDIT
Local bills are
paid by cash
or on the
credits term of
30-60 days.
Imports are by
T/T.
Exports are against
T/T.
BANKING
Kasikornbank
Public Co., Ltd.
[Surawong
Branch : 462-468
Surawong Rd., Silom,
Bangrak, Bangkok 10500.
Tel. 2639-4060,
fax. 2639-0927]
EMPLOYMENT
The
subject currently employs
approximately 60 office
staff and factory
workers.
LOCATION
DETAILS
The
premise is rented for
administrative office at
the heading address.
Premise is located
in a prime
commercial area.
Factory
is located at
8 Muang district,
Nakornratchasima province 30000.
COMMENT
The subject
is a manufacturer and
distributor of diamonds and
precious stones. Its
performance was related
with the conditions
of jewelry consumption
both local and overseas markets, which
are likely to
expand slowly this
year.
The
capital was registered
at Bht. 1,000,000
divided into 10,000 shares
of Bht. 100
each with fully
paid.
The
capital was increased
later as follows:
Bht. 2,000,000
on June 27,
2007
Bht. 4,000,000
on November 7,
2007
The
latest registered capital
was increased to
Bht. 4,000,000 divided
into 40,000 shares
of Bht. 100 each
with fully paid.
THE
SHAREHOLDERS LISTED WERE :
[as at
April 17, 2012]
|
NAME |
HOLDING |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Thanasak Subhirankul Nationality: Thai Address : 91/6
Charoenmuang Rd., Rongmuang,
Pathumwan, Bangkok |
24,994 |
62.49 |
|
Mr. Narongkoch Kompasakorn Nationality: Thai Address : 108/4
Padungdaw Rd.,
Samphantawong, Bangkok |
15,001 |
37.50 |
|
Mrs. Suvimol Subhirankul Nationality: Thai Address : 91/6
Charoenmuang Rd., Rongmuang,
Pathumwan, Bangkok
|
1 |
|
|
Ms. Panjarat Subhirankul Nationality: Thai Address : 91/6
Charoenmuang Rd., Rongmuang,
Pathumwan, Bangkok |
1 |
|
|
Ms. Amporn Chantawutsethti Nationality: Thai Address : 31/8
Trok Wad Sangkajay,
Wad Thaphra,
Bangkokyai, Bangkok |
1 |
= 0.01 |
|
Ms. Phennipa Keratikriengkrai Nationality: Thai Address : 58/2-5
Ratchadapisek Rd., Wad
Thaphra, Bangkokyai, Bangkok
|
1 |
|
|
Mr. Wisith Jirayuwat Nationality: Thai Address : 18
Soi 1, Muang,
Chonburi |
1 |
|
Total Shareholders : 7
Share Structure [as
at April 17,
2012]
|
Nationality |
Shareholders |
No. of Share |
% Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thai |
7 |
40,000 |
100.00 |
|
Foreign |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total |
7 |
40,000 |
100.00 |
NAME OF AUDITOR
& CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANT NO. :
Mr. Yuthapong Ngamvichan
No. 7613
The
latest financial figures
published for December
31, 2011 &
2010 were:
ASSETS
|
Current Assets |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
96,597.89 |
15,677.82 |
|
Trade Accounts Receivable
|
6,630,909.91 |
6,015,848.89 |
|
Inventories |
2,215,287.22 |
1,413,883.94 |
|
Refundable Value Added Tax |
1,146,347.45 |
362,667.00 |
|
Other Current Assets
|
16,792.37 |
9,645.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
10,105,934.84 |
7,817,723.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Assets |
8,185,282.52 |
1,033,999.59 |
|
Intangible Assets |
21,269.45 |
25,270.51 |
|
Retention |
1,331,200.00 |
129,700.00 |
|
Total Assets |
19,643,686.81 |
9,006,693.19 |
LIABILITIES &
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY [BAHT]
|
Current
Liabilities |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Accounts & Other
Payable |
10,549,286.60 |
1,658,535.87 |
|
Short-term Loan from Related
Person |
5,280,366.29 |
5,486,562.84 |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
1,827,986.67 |
385,457.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
17,657,639.56 |
7,530,556.51 |
|
Total Liabilities |
17,657,639.56 |
7,530,556.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital : Baht 100
value authorized, issued
and fully paid share
capital 40,000 shares |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Paid |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
|
Retained Earning - Unappropriated |
[2,013,952.75] |
[2,523,863.32] |
|
Total Shareholders' Equity |
1,986,047.25 |
1,476,136.68 |
|
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity |
19,643,686.81 |
9,006,693.19 |
|
Revenue |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
21,514,102.14 |
13,488,644.68 |
|
Other Income |
763,619.35 |
337,243.00 |
|
Total Revenues |
22,277,721.49 |
13,825,887.68 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods
Sold |
11,446,228.57 |
7,541,753.23 |
|
Selling Expenses |
1,624,541.71 |
1,264,452.38 |
|
Administrative Expenses |
8,612,826.57 |
3,445,908.88 |
|
Loss on Exchange Rate |
- |
1,388,873.68 |
|
Total Expenses |
21,683,596.85 |
13,640,988.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit / [Loss] before Income Tax |
594,124.64 |
184,899.51 |
|
Income Tax |
[84,214.07] |
[35,977.72] |
|
Net Profit / [Loss] |
509,910.57 |
148,921.79 |
|
ITEM |
UNIT |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
CURRENT RATIO |
TIMES |
0.57 |
1.04 |
|
QUICK RATIO |
TIMES |
0.38 |
0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
2.63 |
13.05 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
1.10 |
1.50 |
|
INVENTORY CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
70.64 |
68.43 |
|
INVENTORY TURNOVER |
TIMES |
5.17 |
5.33 |
|
RECEIVABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
112.50 |
162.79 |
|
RECEIVABLES TURNOVER |
TIMES |
3.24 |
2.24 |
|
PAYABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
336.40 |
80.27 |
|
CASH CONVERSION CYCLE |
DAYS |
(153.26) |
150.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFITABILITY
RATIO |
|
|
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
% |
53.20 |
55.91 |
|
SELLING & ADMINISTRATION |
% |
47.58 |
34.92 |
|
INTEREST |
% |
- |
- |
|
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
50.35 |
46.59 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN BEFORE EX. ITEM |
% |
2.76 |
1.37 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
2.37 |
1.10 |
|
RETURN ON EQUITY |
% |
25.67 |
10.09 |
|
RETURN ON ASSET |
% |
2.60 |
1.65 |
|
EARNING PER SHARE |
BAHT |
12.75 |
3.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVERAGE RATIO |
|
|
|
|
DEBT RATIO |
TIMES |
0.90 |
0.84 |
|
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO |
TIMES |
8.89 |
5.10 |
|
TIME INTEREST EARNED |
TIMES |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL GROWTH |
|
|
|
|
SALES GROWTH |
% |
59.50 |
|
|
OPERATING PROFIT |
% |
221.32 |
|
|
NET PROFIT |
% |
242.40 |
|
|
FIXED ASSETS |
% |
691.61 |
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
% |
118.10 |
|

PROFITABILITY
RATIO
|
Gross Profit Margin |
50.35 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
15.76 |
|
Net Profit Margin |
2.37 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
0.15 |
|
Return on Assets |
2.60 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
(0.02) |
|
Return on Equity |
25.67 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
0.02 |
Gross Profit Margin used to assess a firm's financial health by
revealing the proportion of money left over from revenues after accounting for the
cost of goods sold. Gross profit margin serves as the source for paying
additional expenses and future savings. The
company’s figure is 50.35%. When
compared with the industry average, the ratio of the company was higher, this
indicated that company was more profitable than the same industry.
Net Profit Margin is the indicator of the company's efficiency in that
net profit takes into consideration all expenses of the company. A low profit
margin indicates a low margin of safety, higher risk that a decline in sales
will erase profits and result in a net loss. The company’s figure is 2.37%, higher figure when
compared with those of its average competitors in the same industry, indicated
that business was an efficient operator
in a dominant position within its industry.
Return on Assets measures how efficiently profits are being generated
from the assets employed in the business when compared with the ratios of firms
in a similar business. A low ratio in comparison with industry averages
indicates an inefficient use of business assets. Return on Assets ratio is
2.6%, higher figure when compared with those of its average competitors in the
same industry, indicated that business was an efficient profit in a dominant position within its industry.
Return on Equity indicates how profitable a company is by comparing its
net income to its average shareholders' equity, ROE measures how much the
shareholders earned for their investment in the company. Return on Equity ratio
in 25.67%, higher figure when compared with those of its average competitors in
the same industry, indicated that business was an efficient profit in a dominant position within its industry.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Return on Assets Uptrend
Return on Equity Uptrend

LIQUIDITY RATIO
|
Current Ratio |
0.57 |
Risky |
Industrial
Average |
1.75 |
|
Quick Ratio |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Conversion Cycle |
(153.26) |
|
|
|
The Current Ratio is to ascertain whether a company's short-term assets
are readily available to pay off its short-term liabilities. The company's
figure is 0.57 times in 2011, decreased from 1.04 times, then the company may
not be efficiently using its current assets. When compared with the industry
average, the ratio of the company was lower.
The Quick Ratio is a liquidity indicator that further refines the
current ratio by measuring the amount of the most liquid current assets there
are to cover current liabilities. The company's figure is 0.38 times in 2011,
decreased from 0.8 times, then the company has not enough current assets that
presumably can be quickly converted to cash for pay financial obligations.
The Cash Conversion Cycle measures the number of days a company's cash
is tied up in the production and sales process of its operations and the
benefit from payment terms from its creditors. It meant the company could
survive when no cash inflow was received from sale for -154 days.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Current Ratio Uptrend


LEVERAGE RATIO
|
Debt Ratio |
0.90 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
1.23 |
|
Debt to Equity Ratio |
8.89 |
Risky |
Industrial
Average |
6.90 |
|
Times Interest Earned |
- |
|
Industrial
Average |
0.96 |
Debt to Equity Ratio a measurement of how much suppliers, lenders,
creditors and obligors have committed to the company versus what the shareholders
have committed. A lower the percentage means that the company is using less
leverage and has a stronger equity position.
Debt Ratio shows the proportion of a company's assets which are financed
through debt. The company's figure is 0.9 greater than 0.5, most of the
company's assets are financed through debt.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Debt Ratio Uptrend
Times Interest Earned Uptrend

ACTIVITY RATIO
|
Fixed Assets Turnover |
2.63 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
2.25 |
|
Total Assets Turnover |
1.10 |
Satisfactory |
Industrial
Average |
1.12 |
|
Inventory Conversion Period |
70.64 |
|
|
|
|
Inventory Turnover |
5.17 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
4.11 |
|
Receivables Conversion Period |
112.50 |
|
|
|
|
Receivables Turnover |
3.24 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
2.65 |
|
Payables Conversion Period |
336.40 |
|
|
|
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Fixed Assets Turnover Uptrend
Total Assets Turnover Uptrend
Inventory Turnover Uptrend
Receivables Turnover Uptrend
DIAMOND INDUSTRY –
INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world
as the birthplace for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of
diamonds but history says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in
India. Diamond production in India can be traced back to almost 8th
Century B.C. India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th
Century when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of
S. Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was
possible only due to combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian
workforce and the untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires,
supported by progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses
derives its importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations
which operate in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business
enterprises include spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction
costs, small, nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage
and philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on
many fronts including higher standard of corporate governance, long-term
performance – focused strategies, modern management and technology.
-
The diamond jewellery industry in India today may be
more than Rs 60000 mil and is rated amongst the fastest growing in the
world. Indi ranks third in the world in domestic diamond consumption.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with
some medium and large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious
import – export, inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In
the process, several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees.
They mostly diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and
capital markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th
October 2010 is as under –
DIAMOND SAGA – DIRTY DOZEN STUCK WITH 2K CR DEBT
This
could be the biggest credibility crisis the Indian diamond industry has ever
faced. Fifteen banks run the risk of losing Rs 2000 crore lent to a dozen
diamond firms in Surat. Until about two months ago, they had not repaid
these dues. Bankers believe many diamantaires borrowed money during the
economic downturn two years ago and diverted funds to businesses like real estate
and capital markets. Many of themselves made money from these businesses but
their diamond companies have gone sick and declared insolvency.
-
Most of the money borrowed from the banks in the name
of their diamond business has been diverted in real estate and the share
market. The banks are not in a position to seize their properties because in
many cases, these were purchased in the name of their relatives and friends.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.54.63 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.88.40 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.71.86 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Report Prepared
by : |
MNL |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively below
average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
---- |
NB |
New Business |
---- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment record
(10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.