![]()
MIRA INFORM REPORT
|
Report Date : |
28.01.2012 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
LIZA
DIAM LTD. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
30th Floor, Jewellery Trade Center, 919/377 Silom Road, Silom, Bangrak, Bangkok 10500 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Thailand |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2010 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
10.02.1999 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
0105542010627 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private
Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Importer,
Distributor and Exporter of Diamonds, Gemstones and Jewelry |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees
: |
03 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
|
|
|
Payment
Behaviour : |
No Complaints |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES:
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – September 30th, 2011
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (30.06.2011) |
Current Rating (30.09.2011) |
|
Thailand |
b1 |
b1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
LIZA DIAM
LTD.
BUSINESS
ADDRESS : 30th FLOOR,
JEWELLERY TRADE CENTER,
919/377 SILOM
ROAD, SILOM,
BANGRAK, BANGKOK
10500, THAILAND
TELEPHONE : [66] 2630-1001-2
FAX : [66] 2630-1003
E-MAIL
ADDRESS : lizadiamltd@hotmail.com
REGISTRATION
ADDRESS : SAME
AS BUSINESS ADDRESS
ESTABLISHED
: 1999
REGISTRATION
NO. : 0105542010627
CAPITAL REGISTERED : BHT. 4,000,000
CAPITAL PAID-UP : BHT. 4,000,000
SHAREHOLDER’S PROPORTION : THAI :
51%
INDIAN
: 49%
FISCAL YEAR CLOSING DATE : DECEMBER 31
LEGAL
STATUS : PRIVATE LIMITED
COMPANY
EXECUTIVE : MR. MITESH LAXMICHAND
SHAH, INDIAN
MANAGING
DIRECTOR
NO.
OF STAFF : 3
LINES
OF BUSINESS : DIAMONDS, GEMSTONES
AND JEWELRY
IMPORTER, DISTRIBUTOR
AND EXPORTER
OPERATING
TREND : STABLE
PRESENT
SITUATION : OPERATING NORMALLY
REPUTATION : GOOD
WITH NORMAL BUSINESS
ENGAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
STANDARD : MANAGEMENT WITH
FAIR PERFORMANCE
The
subject was established on February
10, 1999 as
a private limited
company under the registered name
LIZA DIAM LTD.
by Thai and
Indian groups, with the
objective to be
engaged in jewelry trading
business. It currently
employs 3 staff.
The subject’s registered
address is 30th Flr., Jewellery Trade
Center, 919/377 Silom Rd., Silom, Bangrak,
Bangkok 10500, and
this is the
subject’s current operation
address.
|
Name |
|
Nationality |
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Mitesh Laxmichand Shah |
|
Indian |
42 |
|
Mr. Mahesh Damodar Nambir |
|
Indian |
36 |
One of the
above directors can
sign on behalf
of the subject
with company’s affixed.
Mr. Mitesh Laxmichand Shah
is the Managing
Director.
He is Indian
nationality with the
age of 42
years old.
The subject is
engaged in importing
and distributing of diamonds
and gemstones, as
well as exporting
of Thai jewelry
products.
PURCHASE
Jewelry
products are purchased
from local suppliers.
IMPORT
Diamonds
and gemstones are
imported from India.
SALES
Diamonds and gemstones
are sold locally
by wholesale to
jewelry manufacturers and
end-users.
EXPORT
Jewelry products are
exported to Hong
Kong, Republic of
China and India.
SUBSIDIARY AND AFFILIATED
COMPANY
The subject is
not found to
have any subsidiary
or affiliated company
here in Thailand.
LITIGATION
Bankruptcy and
Receivership
There are no
litigation on bankruptcy
and receivership cases
filed against the subject found
at Legal Execution
Department for the
past five years.
Others
There are no
legal suits filed
against the subject
for the past
two years.
CREDIT
Sales are by
cash or on
the credits term
of 30-60 days.
Local bills are
paid by cash
or on the
credits term of
30-60 days.
Imports are by
L/C at sight
or T/T.
Exports are against
T/T.
BANKING
Indian
Overseas Bank [Thailand
Branch]
EMPLOYMENT
The
subject employs 3
staff.
LOCATION
DETAILS
The
premise is rented for
administrative office at
the heading address.
Premise is located
in a prime
commercial area.
REMARK
MAXIMUM
CREDIT SHOULD BE
GRANTED AT US$
1,000,000.
COMMENT
In
2010 the business
performance was considered
outstanding compared to the
previous year. With
the improvement of jewelry
industry has prompted
the subject to increase
its sales volume
to meet with rising
demand from both local
and export markets.
Operation in
2011 seems to have better
performance in the
first nine months of
year due to
consumption has improved
continuously. The massive floods
in the country during the months
of October to December was
not effected to subject’s
business which was
ended the year
with the good
results.
The
capital was registered
at Bht. 2,000,000
divided into 20,000
shares of Bht.
100 each with
fully paid.
On
December 4, 2000, the capital
was increased to Bht. 4,000,000 divided
into 40,000 shares
of Bht. 100 each
with fully paid.
THE SHAREHOLDERS
LISTED WERE : [as at
April 25, 2011]
|
NAME |
HOLDING |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Mitesh Laxmichand Shah Nationality: Indian Address : 919/377
Silom Rd., Silom,
Bangrak, Bangkok |
19,000 |
47.50 |
|
Mr. Visai Khaimook Nationality: Thai Address : 4
Moo 3, Dontaen,
Ranode, Songkhla |
4,400 |
11.00 |
|
Ms. Sarinya Chiamsak Nationality: Thai Address :
2345/158 Rama 4
Rd., Klongtoey, Bangkok |
4,000 |
10.00 |
|
Ms. Ladda Meeyoo Nationality: Thai Address : 17
Moo 7, Kohsanphra,
Pleng, Ratchburi |
4,000 |
10.00 |
|
Mr. Yuthana Phoochan Nationality: Thai Address : 3603/16
Prachasongkroh Rd., Dindaeng, Bangkok |
4,000 |
10.00 |
|
Mr. Sawaeng Sabai Nationality: Thai Address : 34/1
Moo 1, Kamyard,
Phothong, Angthong |
4,000 |
10.00 |
|
Mr. Manish Kumar Madubhai
Sukkadia Nationality: Indian Address :
919/377 Silom Rd.,
Silom, Bangrak, Bangkok |
600 |
1.50 |
Total Shareholders : 7
Share Structure [as
at April 25,
2011]
|
Nationality |
Shareholders |
No. of Share |
% Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thai |
5 |
20,400 |
51.00 |
|
Foreign - Indian |
2 |
19,600 |
49.00 |
|
Total |
7 |
40,000 |
100.00 |
NAME OF AUDITOR
& CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANT NO. :
Ms. Anchalee Khaola-or No.
10363
The
latest financial figures
published for December
31, 2010 &
2009 were:
ASSETS
|
Current Assets |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalent |
424,099.25 |
72,053.26 |
|
Trade Accounts Receivable |
154,202,779.45 |
9,198,703.12 |
|
Inventories |
6,242,747.61 |
6,520,133.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
160,869,626.31 |
15,790,889.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Assets |
4,043.30 |
6,408.12 |
|
Prepaid Income Tax |
33,000.00 |
33,000.00 |
|
Total Assets |
160,906,669.61 |
15,830,297.89 |
LIABILITIES &
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY [BAHT]
|
Current
Liabilities |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Accounts Payable |
156,618,102.87 |
12,762,952.62 |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
203,577.52 |
10,830.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
156,821,680.39 |
12,773,782.62 |
|
Total Liabilities |
156,821,680.39 |
12,773,782.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital : Baht 100
par value authorized, issued
and fully paid share
capital 40,000 shares |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Paid |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
|
Retained Earning -
Unappropriated |
84,989.22 |
[943,484.73] |
|
Total Shareholders' Equity |
4,084,989.22 |
3,056,515.27 |
|
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity |
160,906,669.61 |
15,830,297.89 |
|
Revenue |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Income |
377,802,460.05 |
5,654,877.58 |
|
Other Income |
2,492,327.16 |
28,684.32 |
|
Total Revenues |
380,294,787.21 |
5,683,561.90 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods
Sold |
377,634,577.30 |
4,947,924.99 |
|
Selling and Administrative Expenses |
1,441,998.44 |
784,033.55 |
|
Total Expenses |
379,076,575.74 |
5,731,958.54 |
|
Profit / [Loss] before Income
Tax |
1,218,211.47 |
[48,396.64] |
|
Income Tax |
[189,737.52] |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit / [Loss] |
1,028,473.95 |
[48,396.64] |
|
ITEM |
UNIT |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
CURRENT RATIO |
TIMES |
1.03 |
1.24 |
|
QUICK RATIO |
TIMES |
0.99 |
0.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
93,439.14 |
882.46 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
2.35 |
0.36 |
|
INVENTORY CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
6.03 |
480.98 |
|
INVENTORY TURNOVER |
TIMES |
60.49 |
0.76 |
|
RECEIVABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
148.98 |
593.74 |
|
RECEIVABLES TURNOVER |
TIMES |
2.45 |
0.61 |
|
PAYABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
151.38 |
941.50 |
|
CASH CONVERSION CYCLE |
DAYS |
3.63 |
133.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFITABILITY
RATIO |
|
|
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
% |
99.96 |
87.50 |
|
SELLING & ADMINISTRATION |
% |
0.38 |
13.86 |
|
INTEREST |
% |
- |
- |
|
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
0.70 |
13.01 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN BEFORE EX. ITEM |
% |
0.32 |
(0.86) |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
0.27 |
(0.86) |
|
RETURN ON EQUITY |
% |
25.18 |
(1.58) |
|
RETURN ON ASSET |
% |
0.64 |
(0.31) |
|
EARNING PER SHARE |
BAHT |
25.71 |
(1.21) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVERAGE RATIO |
|
|
|
|
DEBT RATIO |
TIMES |
0.97 |
0.81 |
|
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO |
TIMES |
38.39 |
4.18 |
|
TIME INTEREST EARNED |
TIMES |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL GROWTH |
|
|
|
|
SALES GROWTH |
% |
6,581.00 |
|
|
OPERATING PROFIT |
% |
(2,617.14) |
|
|
NET PROFIT |
% |
2,225.09 |
|
|
FIXED ASSETS |
% |
(36.90) |
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
% |
916.45 |
|

|
Gross Profit Margin |
0.70 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
25.80 |
|
Net Profit Margin |
0.27 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
(40.29) |
|
Return on Assets |
0.64 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
(7.86) |
|
Return on Equity |
25.18 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
(8.60) |
Gross Profit Margin used to assess a firm's financial health by
revealing the proportion of money left over from revenues after accounting for
the cost of goods sold. Gross profit margin serves as the source for paying
additional expenses and future savings. The company's figure is 0.7%. When
compared with the industry average, the ratio of the company was lower. This
indicated that company was originated from the problems with control
over its costs.
Net Profit Margin is the indicator of the company's efficiency in that
net profit takes into consideration all expenses of the company. A low profit
margin indicates a low margin of safety, higher risk that a decline in sales
will erase profits and result in a net loss. The company's figure is 0.27%, higher figure when compared with those
of its average competitors in the same industry, indicated that business was an
efficient operator in a dominant
position within its industry.
Return on Assets measures how efficiently profits are being generated
from the assets employed in the business when compared with the ratios of firms
in a similar business. A low ratio in comparison with industry averages
indicates an inefficient use of business assets. Return on Assets ratio is 0.64%, higher figure when compared
with those of its average competitors in the same industry, indicated that
business was an efficient profit in a
dominant position within its industry.
Return on Equity indicates how profitable a company is by comparing its
net income to its average shareholders' equity, ROE measures how much the
shareholders earned for their investment in the company. Return on Equity ratio
is 25.18%, higher figure when compared with those of its average competitors in
the same industry, indicated that business was an efficient profit in a dominant position within its industry.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Return on Assets Downtrend
Return on Equity Downtrend

|
Current Ratio |
1.03 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
56.30 |
|
Quick Ratio |
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Conversion Cycle |
3.63 |
|
|
|
The Current Ratio is to ascertain whether a company's short-term assets
are readily available to pay off its short-term liabilities. The company's
figure is 1.03 times in 2010, decreased from 1.24 times, then it is generally
considered to have good short-term financial strength. When compared with the
industry average, the ratio of the company was lower.
The Quick Ratio is a liquidity indicator that further refines the
current ratio by measuring the amount of the most liquid current assets there
are to cover current liabilities. The company's figure is 0.99 times in 2010,
increased from 0.73 times, by excluding inventory, the company may have
problems meeting current liabilities.
The Cash Conversion Cycle measures the number of days a company's cash
is tied up in the production and sales process of its operations and the
benefit from payment terms from its creditors. It meant the company could
survive when no cash inflow was received from sale for 4 days.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Current Ratio Uptrend


|
Debt Ratio |
0.97 |
Acceptable |
Industrial
Average |
0.97 |
|
Debt to Equity Ratio |
38.39 |
Risky |
Industrial
Average |
1.81 |
|
Times Interest Earned |
- |
|
Industrial
Average |
(12.71) |
Debt to Equity Ratio a measurement of how much suppliers, lenders,
creditors and obligors have committed to the company versus what the
shareholders have committed. A lower the percentage means that the company is
using less leverage and has a stronger equity position.
Debt Ratio shows the proportion of a company's assets which are financed
through debt. The company's figure is 0.97 greater than 0.5, most of the
company's assets are financed through debt.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Debt Ratio Uptrend
Times Interest Earned Downtrend

|
Fixed Assets Turnover |
93,439.14 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
60,262.57 |
|
Total Assets Turnover |
2.35 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
1.38 |
|
Inventory Conversion Period |
6.03 |
|
|
|
|
Inventory Turnover |
60.49 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
8.21 |
|
Receivables Conversion Period |
148.98 |
|
|
|
|
Receivables Turnover |
2.45 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
16.03 |
|
Payables Conversion Period |
151.38 |
|
|
|
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Fixed Assets Turnover Uptrend
Total Assets Turnover Downtrend
Inventory Turnover Uptrend
Receivables Turnover Uptrend
DIAMOND INDUSTRY –
INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world as the birthplace
for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of diamonds but history
says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in India. Diamond
production in India can be traced back to almost 8th Century B.C.
India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th Century
when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of S.
Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was possible only due to
combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian workforce and the
untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires, supported by
progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses derives its
importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations which operate
in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business enterprises include
spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction costs, small,
nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage and
philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on many fronts including
higher standard of corporate governance, long-term performance – focused
strategies, modern management and technology.
-
The diamond jewellery industry in India today may be more than Rs 60000
mil and is rated amongst the fastest growing in the world. Indi ranks
third in the world in domestic diamond consumption.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with some medium and
large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious import – export,
inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In the process,
several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees. They mostly
diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and capital
markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th October 2010 is as
under –
DIAMOND SAGA – DIRTY DOZEN STUCK WITH 2K CR DEBT
This could be the biggest credibility crisis
the Indian diamond industry has ever faced. Fifteen banks run the risk of
losing Rs 2000 crore lent to a dozen diamond firms in Surat. Until about two
months ago, they had not repaid these dues. Bankers believe many
diamantaires borrowed money during the economic downturn two years ago and
diverted funds to businesses like real estate and capital markets. Many of
themselves made money from these businesses but their diamond companies have
gone sick and declared insolvency.
-
Most of the money borrowed from the banks in the name of their diamond
business has been diverted in real estate and the share market. The banks are
not in a position to seize their properties because in many cases, these were
purchased in the name of their relatives and friends.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.49.65 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.77.80 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.65.05 |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
---- |
NB |
New Business |
---- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.