|
Report Date : |
03.11.2012 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
RISHABH INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. |
|
|
Registered Office : |
Room 605, 6th Floor,
Bangrak, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
14.02.2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
0105550017287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LINE OF BUSINESS : |
IMPORTER AND DISTRIBUTOR OF DIAMONDS, GEMSTONES
AND JEWELRY PRODUCTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
Not Available |
|
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
No Complaints |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made on
e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – June 30th, 2012
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.03.2011) |
Current Rating (30.06.2012) |
|
Thailand |
B1 |
B1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
THAILAND - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
With a well-developed
infrastructure, a free-enterprise economy, generally pro-investment policies,
and strong export industries, Thailand enjoyed solid growth from 2000 to 2007 -
averaging more than 4% per year - as it recovered from the Asian financial crisis
of 1997-98. Thai exports - mostly machinery and electronic components,
agricultural commodities, and jewelry - continue to drive the economy,
accounting for more than half of GDP. The global financial crisis of 2008-09
severely cut Thailand's exports, with most sectors experiencing double-digit
drops. In 2009, the economy contracted 2.3%. In 2010, Thailand's economy
expanded 7.8%, its fastest pace since 1995, as exports rebounded from their
depressed 2009 level. Steady economic growth at just below 4% during the first
three quarters of 2011 was interrupted by historic flooding in October and
November in the industrial areas north of Bangkok, crippling the manufacturing
sector and leading to a revised growth rate of only 0.1% for the year. The
industrial sector is poised to recover from the second quarter of 2012 onward,
however, and the government anticipates the economy will probably grow between
5.5 and 6.5% for 2012, while private sector forecasts range between 3.8% and
5.7%.
Source : CIA
RISHABH
INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.
BUSINESS
ADDRESS : ROOM 605, 6th FLOOR,
99
MAHAESAK
ROAD, SURIYAWONGSE,
BANGRAK, BANGKOK
10500, THAILAND
TELEPHONE : [66] 2635-6366
FAX :
-
E-MAIL
ADDRESS : -
REGISTRATION
ADDRESS : SAME
AS BUSINESS ADDRESS
ESTABLISHED
: 2007
REGISTRATION
NO. : 0105550017287
TAX
ID NO. : 3032529051
CAPITAL REGISTERED : BHT. 4,000,000
CAPITAL PAID-UP : BHT.
4,000,000
SHAREHOLDER’S PROPORTION : THAI :
51.00%
INDIAN
: 49.00%
FISCAL YEAR
CLOSING DATE : DECEMBER 31
LEGAL
STATUS : PRIVATE LIMITED
COMPANY
EXECUTIVE : MR. MUKESH KUMAR
CHOUDHARY, INDIAN
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.
OF STAFF : -
LINES
OF BUSINESS : DIAMONDS, GEMSTONES
AND JEWELRY PRODUCTS
IMPORTER
AND DISTRIBUTOR
OPERATING
TREND : STABLE
PRESENT
SITUATION : -
REPUTATION : -
MANAGEMENT
STANDARD : -
The
subject was established
on February 14, 2007
as a private
limited company under
the registered name
RISHABH INTERNATIONAL CO.,
LTD. by Thai and Indian
groups. Its business
objective is declared
to the Commercial
Registration Department, as an importer
and distributor of
diamonds, gemstones and
jewelry products.
The
subject’s registered address is Room
605, 6th Floor,
Piyamitr Building, 99 Mahaesak Rd., Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok 10500,
and this is
the subject’s current
operation address.
|
Name |
|
Nationality |
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Choudhary |
|
Indian |
33 |
The above director
signs on behalf
of the subject
with company’s affixed.
Note:
Please
be informed that
the subject refused to release
the company’s information
during the investigation.
The
subject operates as
an importer and distributor
of diamonds, gemstones
and jewelry products.
Unfortunately, we could
not obtain further
information regarding the company’s
business operation due to
the subject refused
to release its information. Therefore,
small credit amount
should be treated
on a secured basis only.
The
capital was registered
at Bht. 2,000,000
divided into 20,000
shares of Bht.
100 each with
fully paid.
On
June 1, 2007,
the registered capital
was increased to
Bht. 4,000,000 divided
into 40,000 shares
of Bht. 100 each
with fully paid.
THE
SHAREHOLDERS LISTED WERE
: [as at
April 27, 2012]
|
NAME |
HOLDING |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Kanda Thabthimthes Nationality: Thai Address : 411/46
Krungthep-Kreetha Rd., Huamark,
Bangkapi, Bangkok |
20,400 |
51.00 |
|
Mr. Mukesh Kumar
Choudhary Nationality: Indian Address : 99
Mahaesak Rd., Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok 10500 |
19,000 |
47.50 |
|
Mrs. Geetanjli Jain Nationality: Indian Address : 99
Mahaesak Rd., Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok 10500 |
600 |
1.50 |
Total Shareholders : 3
Share Structure [as
at April 27,
2012]
|
Nationality |
Shareholders |
No. of Share |
% Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thai |
1 |
20,400 |
51.00 |
|
Foreign - Indian |
2 |
19,600 |
49.00 |
|
Total |
3 |
40,000 |
100.00 |
NAME OF AUDITOR
& CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANT NO. :
Mr. Srisak Saksongmuang No.
7650
The
latest financial figures
published for December
31, 2011 &
2010 were:
ASSETS
|
Current Assets |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
176,116.79 |
115,966.49 |
|
Trade Accounts & Other Receivable |
1,423,734.84 |
2,067,339.55 |
|
Inventories |
12,400.27 |
10,194.40 |
|
Other Current Assets
|
80,808.22 |
46,478.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
1,693,060.12 |
2,239,979.24 |
|
Long-term Loans |
1,900,000.00 |
1,150,000.00 |
|
Fixed Assets |
24,990.86 |
40,529.38 |
|
Other Non-current Assets |
32,400.00 |
32,400.00 |
|
Total Assets |
3,650,450.98 |
3,462,908.62 |
LIABILITIES &
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY [BAHT]
|
Current
Liabilities |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Income Tax |
6,019.53 |
3,577.46 |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
22,115.49 |
29,154.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
28,135.02 |
32,731.55 |
|
Total Liabilities |
28,135.02 |
32,731.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital : Baht 100
value authorized, issued
and fully paid share
capital 40,000 shares |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Paid |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
|
Retained Earning - Unappropriated |
[377,684.04] |
[569,822.93] |
|
Total Shareholders' Equity |
3,622,315.96 |
3,430,177.07 |
|
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity |
3,650,450.98 |
3,462,908.62 |
|
Revenue |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
5,227,710.54 |
2,855,900.46 |
|
Gain on Exchange Rate |
47,601.07 |
- |
|
Other Income |
34,808.22 |
46,000.00 |
|
Total Revenues |
5,310,119.83 |
2,901,900.46 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods
Sold |
4,344,635.13 |
1,986,002.40 |
|
Selling Expenses |
150,206.50 |
152,121.56 |
|
Administrative Expenses |
613,169.78 |
804,636.38 |
|
Total Expenses |
5,108,011.41 |
2,942,760.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit / Loss] before Financial Costs & Income Tax |
202,108.42 |
[40,859.88] |
|
Financial Costs |
[2,450.00] |
[1,000.00] |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit / [Loss] before Income Tax |
199,658.42 |
[41,859.88] |
|
Income Tax |
[7,519.53] |
[3,577.46] |
|
Net Profit / [Loss] |
192,138.89 |
[45,437.34] |
|
ITEM |
UNIT |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
CURRENT RATIO |
TIMES |
60.18 |
68.43 |
|
QUICK RATIO |
TIMES |
56.86 |
66.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
209.18 |
70.46 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
1.43 |
0.82 |
|
INVENTORY CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
1.04 |
1.87 |
|
INVENTORY TURNOVER |
TIMES |
350.37 |
194.81 |
|
RECEIVABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
99.41 |
264.22 |
|
RECEIVABLES TURNOVER |
TIMES |
3.67 |
1.38 |
|
PAYABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
- |
- |
|
CASH CONVERSION CYCLE |
DAYS |
100.45 |
266.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFITABILITY
RATIO |
|
|
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
% |
83.11 |
69.54 |
|
SELLING & ADMINISTRATION |
% |
14.60 |
33.50 |
|
INTEREST |
% |
0.05 |
0.04 |
|
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
18.47 |
32.07 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN BEFORE EX. ITEM |
% |
3.87 |
(1.43) |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
3.68 |
(1.59) |
|
RETURN ON EQUITY |
% |
5.30 |
(1.32) |
|
RETURN ON ASSET |
% |
5.26 |
(1.31) |
|
EARNING PER SHARE |
BAHT |
4.80 |
(1.14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVERAGE RATIO |
|
|
|
|
DEBT RATIO |
TIMES |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO |
TIMES |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
TIME INTEREST EARNED |
TIMES |
82.49 |
(40.86) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL GROWTH |
|
|
|
|
SALES GROWTH |
% |
83.05 |
|
|
OPERATING PROFIT |
% |
(594.64) |
|
|
NET PROFIT |
% |
522.87 |
|
|
FIXED ASSETS |
% |
(38.34) |
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
% |
5.42 |
|

PROFITABILITY
RATIO
|
Gross Profit Margin |
18.47 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
15.83 |
|
Net Profit Margin |
3.68 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
0.22 |
|
Return on Assets |
5.26 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
0.24 |
|
Return on Equity |
5.30 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
0.39 |
Gross Profit Margin used to assess a firm's financial health by
revealing the proportion of money left over from revenues after accounting for the
cost of goods sold. Gross profit margin serves as the source for paying
additional expenses and future savings. Gross Profit Margin is 18.47%. When compared with the industry
average, the ratio of the company was higher.
This indicated that company was more profitable than the same industry.
Net Profit Margin is the indicator of the company's efficiency in that
net profit takes into consideration all expenses of the company. A low profit
margin indicates a low margin of safety, higher risk that a decline in sales
will erase profits and result in a net loss. Net Profit Margin ratio is 3.68%,
higher figure when compared with those of its average competitors in the same
industry, indicated that business was an efficient operator in a dominant
position within its industry.
Return on Assets measures how efficiently profits are being generated
from the assets employed in the business when compared with the ratios of firms
in a similar business. A low ratio in comparison with industry averages
indicates an inefficient use of business assets. Return on Assets ratio is
5.26%, higher figure when compared with those of its average competitors in the
same industry, indicated that business was an efficient profit in a dominant
position within its industry.
Return on Equity indicates how profitable a company is by comparing its
net income to its average shareholders' equity, ROE measures how much the
shareholders earned for their investment in the company. Return on Equity ratio
is 5.3%, higher figure when compared with those of its average competitors in
the same industry, indicated that business was an efficient profits in a
dominant position within its industry.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Return on Assets Downtrend
Return on Equity Downtrend

LIQUIDITY RATIO
|
Current Ratio |
60.18 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
1.69 |
|
Quick Ratio |
56.86 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Conversion Cycle |
100.45 |
|
|
|
The Current Ratio is to ascertain whether a company's short-term assets
are readily available to pay off its short-term liabilities. The company's
figure is 60.18 times in 2011, decrease from 68.43 times, then it is generally
considered to have good short-term financial strength. When compared with the
industry average, the ratio of the company was higher, indicated that company
was an efficient operator in a dominant position within its industry.
The Quick Ratio is a liquidity indicator that further refines the
current ratio by measuring the amount of the most liquid current assets there
are to cover current liabilities. The company's figure is 56.86 times in 2011,
decrease from 66.7 times, although excluding inventory so the company still
have good short-term financial strength.
The Cash Conversion Cycle measures the number of days a company's cash
is tied up in the production and sales process of its operations and the
benefit from payment terms from its creditors. It meant the company could survive
when no cash inflow was received from sale for 101 days.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Current Ratio Uptrend


LEVERAGE RATIO
|
Debt Ratio |
0.01 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
0.56 |
|
Debt to Equity Ratio |
0.01 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
1.31 |
|
Times Interest Earned |
82.49 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
0.96 |
Debt to Equity Ratio a measurement of how much suppliers, lenders, creditors
and obligors have committed to the company versus what the shareholders have
committed. A lower the percentage means that the company is using less leverage
and has a stronger equity position.
Times Interest Earned measuring a company's ability to meet its debt
obligations. Ratio is 82.5 higher than 1, so the company can pay interest
expenses on outstanding debt.
Debt Ratio shows the proportion of a company's assets which are financed
through debt. The company's figure is 0.01 less than 0.5, most of the company's
assets are financed through equity.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Debt Ratio Downtrend
Times Interest Earned Downtrend

ACTIVITY RATIO
|
Fixed Assets Turnover |
209.18 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
4.89 |
|
Total Assets Turnover |
1.43 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
1.36 |
|
Inventory Conversion Period |
1.04 |
|
|
|
|
Inventory Turnover |
350.37 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
2.04 |
|
Receivables Conversion Period |
99.41 |
|
|
|
|
Receivables Turnover |
3.67 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
3.46 |
|
Payables Conversion Period |
- |
|
|
|
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Fixed Assets Turnover Downtrend
Total Assets Turnover Downtrend
Inventory Turnover Downtrend
Receivables Turnover Downtrend
DIAMOND INDUSTRY –
INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world
as the birthplace for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of diamonds
but history says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in India.
Diamond production in India can be traced back to almost 8th Century
B.C. India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th
Century when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of
S. Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was
possible only due to combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian
workforce and the untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires,
supported by progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses
derives its importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations
which operate in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business
enterprises include spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction
costs, small, nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage
and philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on
many fronts including higher standard of corporate governance, long-term
performance – focused strategies, modern management and technology.
-
The diamond jewellery industry in India today may be
more than Rs 60000 mil and is rated amongst the fastest growing in the
world. Indi ranks third in the world in domestic diamond consumption.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with
some medium and large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious
import – export, inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In
the process, several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees.
They mostly diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and
capital markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th
October 2010 is as under –
DIAMOND
SAGA – DIRTY DOZEN STUCK WITH 2K CR DEBT
This could be the biggest credibility crisis
the Indian diamond industry has ever faced. Fifteen banks run the risk of losing
Rs 2000 crore lent to a dozen diamond firms in Surat. Until about two months
ago, they had not repaid these dues. Bankers believe many diamantaires
borrowed money during the economic downturn two years ago and diverted funds to
businesses like real estate and capital markets. Many of themselves made money
from these businesses but their diamond companies have gone sick and declared
insolvency.
-
Most of the money borrowed from the banks in the name
of their diamond business has been diverted in real estate and the share
market. The banks are not in a position to seize their properties because in
many cases, these were purchased in the name of their relatives and friends.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.53.66 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.86.37 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.69.24 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Report
Prepared by : |
PRL |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit transaction.
It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest and
principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable
factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of
interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with full
security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk and
to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.