|
Report Date : |
26.10.2012 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
SHRI GANPATI TRADING CO., LTD. |
|
|
Registered Office : |
6tha
Floor, The Executive
House, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
02.01.2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
0105545000142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LINE OF BUSINESS : |
IMPORTER AND DISTRIBUTOR OF DIAMONDS AND
GEMSTONES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
3 |
|
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Slow but correct |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – June 30th, 2012
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.03.2011) |
Current Rating (30.06.2012) |
|
Thailand |
B1 |
B1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
THAILAND - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
With a well-developed infrastructure,
a free-enterprise economy, generally pro-investment policies, and strong export
industries, Thailand enjoyed solid growth from 2000 to 2007 - averaging more
than 4% per year - as it recovered from the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98.
Thai exports - mostly machinery and electronic components, agricultural
commodities, and jewelry - continue to drive the economy, accounting for more
than half of GDP. The global financial crisis of 2008-09 severely cut
Thailand's exports, with most sectors experiencing double-digit drops. In 2009,
the economy contracted 2.3%. In 2010, Thailand's economy expanded 7.8%, its
fastest pace since 1995, as exports rebounded from their depressed 2009 level.
Steady economic growth at just below 4% during the first three quarters of 2011
was interrupted by historic flooding in October and November in the industrial
areas north of Bangkok, crippling the manufacturing sector and leading to a
revised growth rate of only 0.1% for the year. The industrial sector is poised
to recover from the second quarter of 2012 onward, however, and the government
anticipates the economy will probably grow between 5.5 and 6.5% for 2012, while
private sector forecasts range between 3.8% and 5.7%
Source : CIA
SHRI
GANPATI TRADING CO.,
LTD.
BUSINESS
ADDRESS : 6thA FLOOR,
THE EXECUTIVE HOUSE,
410/19 SURAWONGSE
ROAD, SIPRAYA,
BANGRAK, BANGKOK
10500
TELEPHONE : [66] 2238-3740
FAX :
[66] 2238-3740
E-MAIL
ADDRESS : -
REGISTRATION
ADDRESS : SAME
AS BUSINESS ADDRESS
ESTABLISHED
: 2002
REGISTRATION
NO. : 0105545000142
TAX
ID NO. : 3030753656
CAPITAL REGISTERED : BHT. 4,000,000
CAPITAL PAID-UP : BHT.
4,000,000
SHAREHOLDER’S PROPORTION : THAI :
51.00%
INDIAN
: 49.00%
FISCAL YEAR CLOSING DATE : DECEMBER 31
LEGAL
STATUS : PRIVATE LIMITED
COMPANY
EXECUTIVE : MR. VIVEK KUMAR
SETHI, INDIAN
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.
OF STAFF : 3
LINES
OF BUSINESS : DIAMONDS AND
GEMSTONES
IMPORTER AND
DISTRIBUTOR
OPERATING
TREND : STABLE
PRESENT
SITUATION : OPERATING NORMALLY
REPUTATION : LOW
WITH NORMAL BUSINESS
ENGAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
STANDARD : MANAGEMENT WITH
LOW PERFORMANCE
The
subject was established
on January 2,
2002 as a
private limited company
by Thai and Indian groups,
under the registered
name SHRI GANPATI
TRADING CO., LTD.,
with the business
objective to import
and distribute diamonds
and gemstones for
jewelry industry. It
currently employs 3
staff.
The
subject’s registered address is 6th A Flr., The
Executive House, 410/19 Surawongse Rd., Sipraya, Bangrak,
Bangkok 10500, and
this is the
subject’s current operation
address.
|
Name |
|
Nationality |
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Vivek Kumar Sethi |
|
Indian |
36 |
|
Mr. Surendra Kumar Miya
Bagag |
|
Indian |
54 |
|
Mr. Sandeep Kumar |
|
Indian |
29 |
Any of the
above directors can
sign on behalf
of the subject
with company’s affixed.
Mr. Vivek Kumar Sethi is the
Managing Director.
He is Indian
nationality with the
age of 36
years old.
The subject
is engaged in
importing and distributing
of diamonds and
gemstones for jewelry
industry.
PURCHASE
Its products are
purchased from suppliers
both domestic and
overseas, mainly in India.
SALES
100% of the
products is sold
locally by wholesale
to traders, manufacturers
and
end-users.
The subject is
not found to
have any subsidiary
or affiliated company
here in Thailand.
Bankruptcy and Receivership
There are no
litigation on bankruptcy
and receivership cases
filed against the
subject found at
Legal Execution Department
for the past
five years.
Others
There are no
legal suits filed
against the subject
for the past
two years.
Sales are by
cash or on
the credits term
of 30-60 days.
Local bills are
paid by cash
or on the
credits term of
30-60 days.
Imports are by
T/T.
Bangkok
Bank Public Co.,
Ltd.
The
subject currently employs
3 staff.
The
premise is rented for
administrative office at
the heading address.
Premise is located
in a prime
commercial area.
Its
sales in 2011 remained low
from slow consumption. The
overall jewelry industry
in domestic market seems
to enjoy growing
since the beginning
of this year,
while the subject’s
business is still.
The
capital was registered
at Bht. 2,000,000 divided
into 20,000 shares of
Bht. 100 each
with fully paid.
On
March 30, 2004,
the registered capital
was increased to
Bht. 4,000,000 divided
into 40,000 shares
of Bht. 100 each
with fully paid.
THE
SHAREHOLDERS LISTED WERE
: [as at
April 30, 2012]
|
NAME |
HOLDING |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Vivek Kumar Sethi Nationality: Indian Address : 410/19 Surawongse
Rd., Sipraya, Bangrak, Bangkok |
9,500 |
23.75 |
|
Mr. Sandeep Kumar Nationality: Indian Address : 410/19 Surawongse
Rd., Sipraya, Bangrak,
Bangkok |
9,500 |
23.75 |
|
Ms. Suwanna Dawanyong Nationality: Thai Address : 183
Isaraparp Rd., Wadkalaya,
Thonburi, Bangkok |
5,100 |
12.75 |
|
Mr. Som Piw-ondee Nationality: Thai Address : 35
Moo 14, Jomphra,
Surin |
5,100 |
12.75 |
|
Mr. Supakorn Nam-on Nationality: Thai Address : 28
Moo 7, Buengsamphan, Petchabun
|
5,100 |
12.75 |
|
Ms. Bunyanuch Krasiri Nationality: Thai Address : 913
Charoenkrung Rd., Bangklo, Bangkorlaem, Bangkok |
5,100 |
12.75 |
|
Mr. Surendra Kumar Miya
Bagag Nationality: Indian Address : India |
600 |
1.50 |
Total Shareholders : 7
Share Structure [as
at April 30,
2012]
|
Nationality |
Shareholders |
No. of Share |
% Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thai |
4 |
20,400 |
51.00 |
|
Foreign-Indian |
3 |
19,600 |
49.00 |
|
Total |
7 |
40,000 |
100.00 |
NAME OF AUDITOR
& CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANT NO. :
Mr. Sophon Pholvilai No.
1408
The
latest financial figures
published for December
31, 2011 &
2010 were:
ASSETS
|
Current Assets |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
96,187.27 |
105,383.62 |
|
Trade Accounts Receivable
|
3,706,807.35 |
2,433,240.32 |
|
Inventories |
- |
27,293.98 |
|
Other Current Assets
|
1,911.00 |
1,911.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
3,174,905.62 |
2,567,828.92 |
|
Total Assets |
3,174,905.62 |
2,567,828.92 |
LIABILITIES &
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY [BAHT]
|
Current
Liabilities |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Accounts Payable |
886,144.29 |
- |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
13,200.00 |
11,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
899,344.29 |
11,000.00 |
|
Total Liabilities |
899,344.29 |
11,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital : Baht 100
value authorized, issued
and fully paid share
capital 40,000 shares |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Paid |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
|
Retained Earning - Unappropriated |
[1,724,438.67] |
[1,443,171.08] |
|
Total Shareholders' Equity |
2,275,561.33 |
2,556,828.92 |
|
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity |
3,174,905.62 |
2,567,828.92 |
|
Revenue |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
2,367,846.54 |
1,644,555.94 |
|
Other Income |
23,753.85 |
21,154.17 |
|
Profit / [loss] on Exchange
Rate |
100,231.99 |
[6,120.26] |
|
Total Revenues |
2,491,832.38 |
1,659,589.85 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods
Sold |
2,029,230.77 |
1,352,627.88 |
|
Administrative Expenses |
743,869.20 |
678,533.80 |
|
Total Expenses |
2,773,099.97 |
2,031,161.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit / [Loss] before Income Tax |
[281,267.56] |
[371,571.83] |
|
Income Tax |
- |
- |
|
Net Profit / [Loss] |
[281,267.56] |
[371,571.83] |
|
ITEM |
UNIT |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
CURRENT RATIO |
TIMES |
3.53 |
233.44 |
|
QUICK RATIO |
TIMES |
3.53 |
230.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
- |
- |
|
TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
0.75 |
0.64 |
|
INVENTORY CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
- |
7.37 |
|
INVENTORY TURNOVER |
TIMES |
- |
49.56 |
|
RECEIVABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
571.40 |
540.04 |
|
RECEIVABLES TURNOVER |
TIMES |
0.64 |
0.68 |
|
PAYABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
159.39 |
- |
|
CASH CONVERSION CYCLE |
DAYS |
412.01 |
547.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFITABILITY
RATIO |
|
|
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
% |
85.70 |
82.25 |
|
SELLING & ADMINISTRATION |
% |
31.42 |
41.26 |
|
INTEREST |
% |
- |
- |
|
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
19.54 |
18.67 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN BEFORE EX. ITEM |
% |
(11.88) |
(22.59) |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
(11.88) |
(22.59) |
|
RETURN ON EQUITY |
% |
(12.36) |
(14.53) |
|
RETURN ON ASSET |
% |
(8.86) |
(14.47) |
|
EARNING PER SHARE |
BAHT |
(7.03) |
(9.29) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVERAGE RATIO |
|
|
|
|
DEBT RATIO |
TIMES |
0.28 |
0.00 |
|
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO |
TIMES |
0.40 |
0.00 |
|
TIME INTEREST EARNED |
TIMES |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL GROWTH |
|
|
|
|
SALES GROWTH |
% |
43.98 |
|
|
OPERATING PROFIT |
% |
(24.30) |
|
|
NET PROFIT |
% |
24.30 |
|
|
FIXED ASSETS |
% |
- |
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
% |
23.64 |
|

PROFITABILITY
RATIO
|
Gross Profit Margin |
19.54 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
9.66 |
|
Net Profit Margin |
(11.88) |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
(0.20) |
|
Return on Assets |
(8.86) |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
(0.27) |
|
Return on Equity |
(12.36) |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
(0.72) |
Gross Profit Margin used to assess a firm's financial health by revealing
the proportion of money left over from revenues after accounting for the cost
of goods sold. Gross profit margin serves as the source for paying additional
expenses and future savings. The
company’s figure is 19.54%. When compared with the industry average, the
ratio of the company was higher, this indicated that company was more
profitable than the same industry.
Net Profit Margin is the indicator of the company's efficiency in that
net profit takes into consideration all expenses of the company. A low profit
margin indicates a low margin of safety, higher risk that a decline in sales
will erase profits and result in a net loss. The company's figure is -11.88%.
When compared with the industry average, the ratio of the company was lower.
Return on Assets measures how efficiently profits are being generated
from the assets employed in the business when compared with the ratios of firms
in a similar business. A low ratio in comparison with industry averages
indicates an inefficient use of business assets. When compared with the
industry average, it was lower, the company's figure is -8.86%.
Return on Equity indicates how profitable a company is by comparing its
net income to its average shareholders' equity, ROE measures how much the
shareholders earned for their investment in the company. When compared with the
industry average, it was lower, the company's figure is -12.36%.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Return on Assets Uptrend
Return on Equity Stable

LIQUIDITY RATIO
|
Current Ratio |
3.53 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
1.72 |
|
Quick Ratio |
3.53 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Conversion Cycle |
412.01 |
|
|
|
The Current Ratio is to ascertain whether a company's short-term assets are
readily available to pay off its short-term liabilities. The company's figure
is 3.53 times in 2011, decreased from 233.44 times, then it is generally
considered to have good short-term financial strength. When compared with the
industry average, the ratio of the company was higher, indicated that company
was an efficient operator in a dominant position within its industry.
The Quick Ratio is a liquidity indicator that further refines the
current ratio by measuring the amount of the most liquid current assets there
are to cover current liabilities. The company's figure is 3.53 times in 2011,
decreased from 230.78 times, although excluding inventory so the company still
have good short-term financial strength.
The Cash Conversion Cycle measures the number of days a company's cash
is tied up in the production and sales process of its operations and the
benefit from payment terms from its creditors. It meant the company could
survive when no cash inflow was received from sale for 413 days.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Current Ratio Downtrend


LEVERAGE RATIO
|
Debt Ratio |
0.28 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
0.60 |
|
Debt to Equity Ratio |
0.40 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
1.67 |
|
Times Interest Earned |
- |
|
Industrial
Average |
0.63 |
Debt to Equity Ratio a measurement of how much suppliers, lenders,
creditors and obligors have committed to the company versus what the shareholders
have committed. A lower the percentage means that the company is using less
leverage and has a stronger equity position.
Debt Ratio shows the proportion of a company's assets which are financed
through debt. The company's figure is 0.28 less than 0.5, most of the company's
assets are financed through equity.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Debt Ratio Uptrend
Times Interest Earned Uptrend

ACTIVITY RATIO
|
Fixed Assets Turnover |
- |
|
Industrial
Average |
10.73 |
|
Total Assets Turnover |
0.75 |
Acceptable |
Industrial
Average |
1.47 |
|
Inventory Conversion Period |
- |
|
|
|
|
Inventory Turnover |
- |
|
Industrial
Average |
2.17 |
|
Receivables Conversion Period |
571.40 |
|
|
|
|
Receivables Turnover |
0.64 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
3.31 |
|
Payables Conversion Period |
159.39 |
|
|
|
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Fixed Assets Turnover Uptrend
Total Assets Turnover Downtrend
Inventory Turnover Downtrend
Receivables Turnover Downtrend
DIAMOND INDUSTRY –
INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world
as the birthplace for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of diamonds
but history says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in India.
Diamond production in India can be traced back to almost 8th Century
B.C. India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th
Century when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of
S. Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was
possible only due to combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian
workforce and the untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires,
supported by progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses
derives its importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations
which operate in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business
enterprises include spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction
costs, small, nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage
and philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on
many fronts including higher standard of corporate governance, long-term
performance – focused strategies, modern management and technology.
-
The diamond jewellery industry in India today may be
more than Rs 60000 mil and is rated amongst the fastest growing in the
world. Indi ranks third in the world in domestic diamond consumption.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with
some medium and large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious
import – export, inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In
the process, several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees.
They mostly diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and
capital markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th
October 2010 is as under –
DIAMOND
SAGA – DIRTY DOZEN STUCK WITH 2K CR DEBT
This could be the biggest credibility crisis
the Indian diamond industry has ever faced. Fifteen banks run the risk of
losing Rs 2000 crore lent to a dozen diamond firms in Surat. Until about two
months ago, they had not repaid these dues. Bankers believe many
diamantaires borrowed money during the economic downturn two years ago and
diverted funds to businesses like real estate and capital markets. Many of
themselves made money from these businesses but their diamond companies have
gone sick and declared insolvency.
-
Most of the money borrowed from
the banks in the name of their diamond business has been diverted in real
estate and the share market. The banks are not in a position to seize their
properties because in many cases, these were purchased in the name of their
relatives and friends.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.53.63 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.86.17 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.69.74 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Report
Prepared by : |
PRL |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest capability
for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report.
The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any risk
and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL) or its
officials.