|
Report Date : |
27.12.2013 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
SUIHIANG JEWELLERY CO., LTD. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
40
Gemopolis Industrial Estate,
Soi 31, Sukhapiban 2
Road, Dokmai, Praves, |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2012 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
26.07.2002 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
0105545076637 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Subject is engaged in
manufacturing service various
kinds of 14k, 18k
gold jewelry with
diamonds and gemstones |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
26 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Slow |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – March 31st, 2013
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.12.2012) |
Current Rating (31.03.2013) |
|
Thailand |
B1 |
B1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
THAILAND - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
With a well-developed infrastructure, a free-enterprise
economy, generally pro-investment policies, and strong export industries,
Thailand achieved steady growth due largely to industrial and agriculture
exports - mostly electronics, agricultural commodities, automobiles and parts,
and processed foods. Thailand is trying to maintain growth by encouraging
domestic consumption and public investment to offset weak exports in 2012.
Unemployment, at less than 1% of the labor force, stands as one of the lowest
levels in the world, which puts upward pressure on wages in some industries.
Thailand also attracts nearly 2.5 million migrant workers from neighboring
countries. The Thai government is implementing a nation-wide 300 baht ($10) per
day minimum wage policy and deploying new tax reforms designed to lower rates
on middle-income earners. The Thai economy has weathered internal and external
economic shocks in recent years. The global economic crisis severely cut
Thailand's exports, with most sectors experiencing double-digit drops. In 2009,
the economy contracted 2.3%. However, in 2010, Thailand's economy expanded
7.8%, its fastest pace since 1995, as exports rebounded. In late 2011 growth
was interrupted by historic flooding in the industrial areas in Bangkok and its
five surrounding provinces, crippling the manufacturing sector. Industry
recovered from the second quarter of 2012 onward with GDP growth at 5.5% in
2012. The government has approved flood mitigation projects worth $11.7
billion, which were started in 2012, to prevent similar economic damage, and an
additional $75 billion for infrastructure over the next seven years with a plan
to start in 2013
Source
: CIA
SUIHIANG JEWELLERY
CO., LTD.
BUSINESS
ADDRESS : 40
GEMOPOLIS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,
SOI 31,
SUKHAPIBAN 2
ROAD, DOKMAI, PRAVES,
BANGKOK 10250,
THAILAND
TELEPHONE : [66] 2727-0519-21, 084
651-4398
FAX :
[66] 2727-0522
E-MAIL
ADDRESS : suihiangjewellery@yahoo.com
REGISTRATION
ADDRESS : SAME
AS BUSINESS ADDRESS
ESTABLISHED
: 2002
REGISTRATION
NO. : 0105545076637
TAX
ID NO. : 3030627032
CAPITAL REGISTERED : BHT. 30,000,000
CAPITAL PAID-UP : BHT.
30,000,000
SHAREHOLDER’S PROPORTION : THAI :
51.00%
INDIAN
: 49.00%
FISCAL YEAR CLOSING DATE : DECEMBER 31
LEGAL
STATUS : PRIVATE LIMITED
COMPANY
EXECUTIVE : MR. SAILESH KUMAR
KARSANBHAI BHIMANI,
INDIAN
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.
OF STAFF : 26
LINES
OF BUSINESS : GOLD
JEWELRY PRODUCTS
MANUFACTURER, DISTRIBUTOR
AND EXPORTER
OPERATING
TREND : STABLE
PRESENT
SITUATION : OPERATING NORMALLY
REPUTATION : GOOD
WITH NORMAL BUSINESS
ENGAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
STANDARD : MANAGEMENT WITH
FAIR PERFORMANCE
The
subject was established
on July 26,
2002 as a
private limited company
under the name
style SUIHIANG JEWELLERY
CO., LTD., by
Thai and Indian
groups, with the
business objective to
provide manufacturing service
various kinds of
gold jewelry products
to both domestic
and oversea markets.
It currently employs
26 staff.
The
subject’s registered address
is 40 Gemopolis
Industrial Estate, Soi
31, Sukhapiban 2 Rd.,
Dokmai, Praves, Bangkok 10250, and
this is the
subject’s current operation
address.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTOR
|
Name |
|
Nationality |
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Sailesh Kumar Karsanbhai
Bhimani |
|
Indian |
36 |
|
Mrs. Shilpa Kumari Sailesh
Kumar Bhimani |
|
Indian |
35 |
AUTHORIZED PERSON
One of the
above directors can
sign on behalf
of the subject
with company’s affixed.
MANAGEMENT
Mr. Sailesh Kumar Karsanbhai
Bhimani is the
Managing Director.
He is Indian
nationality with the
age of 36
years old.
The subject is
engaged in manufacturing
service various kinds
of 14k, 18k gold
jewelry with diamonds
and gemstones, e.g. ring, earring,
pin, bangle and bracelet,
cufflink, necklace and etc.,
according to customer’s
requirement and brands.
PURCHASE
Raw materials and components are purchased from
suppliers in both domestic and
overseas, mainly India,
Hong Kong, South
Africa and U.S.A.
SALES/SERVICES
90% of
the products is
exported to U.S.A.,
Singapore, Hong Kong,
Republic of China,
Japan, Korea, Australia,
Canada and many
countries in Middle
East and European
region, and the
remaining 10% is
sold locally.
SUBSIDIARY AND AFFILIATED
COMPANY
The subject is
not found to have
any subsidiary or
affiliated company here
in Thailand.
LITIGATION
Bankruptcy and Receivership
There are no
litigation on bankruptcy
and receivership cases
filed against the
subject found at
Legal Execution Department
for the past
five years.
Others
There are no
legal suits filed
against the subject
for the past
two years.
CREDIT
Sales and services
are by cash
or on the
credits term of
30-60 days.
Local bills are
paid by cash
or on the
credits term of
30-60 days.
Imports are by
L/C at sight
or T/T.
Exports are against
T/T.
BANKING
Kasikornbank Public Co.,
Ltd.
Bank of Ayudhya
Public Co., Ltd.
EMPLOYMENT
The
subject employs 26
staff.
LOCATION
DETAILS
The premise
is owned for administrative office
and factory at
the heading address.
Premise is located
in commercial/residential area.
The
subject was formed in
2002 as a
manufacturing service and exporting
of fine jewelry
products. The subject has
expanded its customer
base in both
local and overseas
markets. This has proven the
quality of service and reputation in
the international market.
Subject
also reported a
good sales revenue
at the year
end of 2012.
However, economy slowdown
and slow spending
both overseas and
domestic market would
effect its sales
in the year
2013.
The
capital was registered
at Bht. 4,000,000 divided into 40,000 shares of Bht. 100 each.
The
capital was increased
later as follows:
Bht. 25,000,000
on March 31,
2005
Bht. 30,000,000
on December 29,
2008
The
latest registered capital
was increased to
Bht. 30,000,000 divided into 300,000 shares
of Bht. 100
each with fully
paid.
THE
SHAREHOLDERS LISTED WERE
: [as at
April 30, 2013]
|
NAME |
HOLDING |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Sailesh Kumar Karsanbhai
Bhimani Nationality: Indian Address : 72
Miba Naka Sosai
Butnivaty,
Waracha Rd., Suraj,
India |
87,000 |
29.00 |
|
Mrs. Mon-anong Pongkeratikarn Nationality: Thai Address : 11
Soi Sutthiporn, Dindaeng,
Bangkok |
33,000 |
11.00 |
|
Mrs. Shilpa Kumari Sailesh
Kumar Bhimani Nationality: Indian Address : 72
Miba Naka Sosai
Butnivaty,
Waracha Rd., Suraj,
India |
30,000 |
10.00 |
|
Ms. Naowarat Aoonrue Nationality: Thai Address : 151/38
Moo 2, Thungkru,
Bangkok |
30,000 |
10.00 |
|
Ms. Nadda Sukanthong Nationality: Thai Address : 83/2
Moo 16, Jun,
Payao |
30,000 |
10.00 |
|
Mr. Narong Kongthon Nationality: Thai Address : 134
Sukhumvit Rd., Klongtonnua, Wattana, Bangkok |
30,000 |
10.00 |
|
Mr. Sathaporn Banterngkul Nationality: Thai Address : 54
Moo 7, Nayom,
Muang, Amnartcharoen |
30,000 |
10.00 |
|
Mr. Beehagay Kumar Bholabhai
Patel Nationality: Indian Address : 12 Nani
Naka Sosai Butnivaty,
A.K. Rd.,
Suraj, India |
30,000 |
10.00 |
Total Shareholders : 8
Share Structure [as
at April 30,
2013]
|
Nationality |
Shareholders |
No. of Share |
% Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thai |
5 |
153,000 |
51.00 |
|
Foreign - Indian |
3 |
147,000 |
49.00 |
|
Total |
8 |
300,000 |
100.00 |
NAME OF AUDITOR
& CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANT NO. :
Ms. Amornrat Boonthanakorn No. 4769
The
latest financial figures
published for December
31, 2012, 2011
& 2010 were:
ASSETS
|
Current Assets |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
237,140.14 |
118,304.45 |
153,343.08 |
|
Trade Accounts & Other Receivable |
137,365,297.43 |
43,569,332.71 |
15,214,453.60 |
|
Inventories |
127,405,616.29 |
165,358,346.41 |
111,936,852.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
265,008,053.86 |
209,045,983.57 |
127,304,649.19 |
|
Fixed Assets |
845,420.58 |
1,224,006.79 |
1,540,657.63 |
|
Other Non-current Assets |
100,600.00 |
112,000.00 |
112,000.00 |
|
Total Assets |
265,954,074.44 |
210,381,990.36 |
128,957,306.82 |
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY [BAHT]
|
Current
Liabilities |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Accounts & Other Payable |
199,851,332.20 |
143,445,884.04 |
53,769,069.81 |
|
Accrued Income Tax |
307,030.09 |
188,573.73 |
359,089.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
200,158,362.29 |
143,634,457.77 |
54,128,159.02 |
|
Long-term Loan from Person or Related Company |
31,271,853.39 |
33,670,365.96 |
42,580,650.00 |
|
Total Liabilities |
231,430,215.68 |
177,304,823.73 |
96,708,809.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital : Baht 100
value authorized, issued
and fully paid share
capital 300,000 shares |
30,000,000.00 |
30,000,000.00 |
30,000,000.00 |
|
Capital Paid |
30,000,000.00 |
30,000,000.00 |
30,000,000.00 |
|
Retained Earning -
Unappropriated |
4,523,858.76 |
3,077,166.63 |
2,248,497.80 |
|
Total Shareholders' Equity |
64,523,858.76 |
33,077,166.63 |
32,248,497.80 |
|
Total Liabilities & Shareholders'
Equity |
265,954,074.44 |
210,381,990.36 |
128,957,306.82 |
|
Revenue |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Income |
147,731,892.19 |
114,064,955.68 |
90,691,710.85 |
|
Other Income |
5,694,983.68 |
228,418.56 |
498,303.91 |
|
Total Revenues |
153,426,875.87 |
114,293,374.24 |
91,190,014.76 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods
Sold |
141,017,304.15 |
103,417,729.53 |
83,190,090.19 |
|
Selling Expenses |
8,673,873.76 |
3,142,099.35 |
3,792,001.18 |
|
Administrative Expenses |
1,751,975.74 |
5,959,819.50 |
2,578,596.82 |
|
Total Expenses |
151,443,153.65 |
112,519,648.38 |
89,560,688.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit / [Loss] Before Income Tax |
1,983,722.22 |
1,773,725.86 |
1,629,326.57 |
|
Income Tax |
[537,030.09] |
[533,573.73] |
[546,589.21] |
|
Net Profit / [Loss] |
1,446,692.13 |
1,240,152.13 |
1,082,737.36 |
|
ITEM |
UNIT |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT RATIO |
TIMES |
1.32 |
1.46 |
2.35 |
|
QUICK RATIO |
TIMES |
0.69 |
0.30 |
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
174.74 |
93.19 |
58.87 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
0.56 |
0.54 |
0.70 |
|
INVENTORY CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
329.77 |
583.61 |
491.13 |
|
INVENTORY TURNOVER |
TIMES |
1.11 |
0.63 |
0.74 |
|
RECEIVABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
339.39 |
139.42 |
61.23 |
|
RECEIVABLES TURNOVER |
TIMES |
1.08 |
2.62 |
5.96 |
|
PAYABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
517.28 |
506.27 |
235.91 |
|
CASH CONVERSION CYCLE |
DAYS |
151.87 |
216.76 |
316.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFITABILITY
RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
% |
95.45 |
90.67 |
91.73 |
|
SELLING & ADMINISTRATION |
% |
7.06 |
7.98 |
7.02 |
|
INTEREST |
% |
- |
- |
- |
|
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
8.40 |
9.53 |
8.82 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN BEFORE EX. ITEM |
% |
1.34 |
1.56 |
1.80 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
0.98 |
1.09 |
1.19 |
|
RETURN ON EQUITY |
% |
2.24 |
3.75 |
3.36 |
|
RETURN ON ASSET |
% |
0.54 |
0.59 |
0.84 |
|
EARNING PER SHARE |
BAHT |
4.82 |
4.13 |
3.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVERAGE RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
DEBT RATIO |
TIMES |
0.87 |
0.84 |
0.75 |
|
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO |
TIMES |
3.59 |
5.36 |
3.00 |
|
TIME INTEREST EARNED |
TIMES |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL GROWTH |
|
|
|
|
|
SALES GROWTH |
% |
29.52 |
25.77 |
|
|
OPERATING PROFIT |
% |
11.84 |
8.86 |
|
|
NET PROFIT |
% |
16.65 |
14.54 |
|
|
FIXED ASSETS |
% |
(30.93) |
(20.55) |
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
% |
26.41 |
63.14 |
|
ANNUAL GROWTH :
IMPRESSIVE
An annual sales growth is 29.52%. Turnover has increased from THB
PROFITABILITY :
RISKY

PROFITABILITY RATIO
|
Gross Profit Margin |
8.40 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
21.85 |
|
Net Profit Margin |
0.98 |
Acceptable |
Industrial
Average |
1.70 |
|
Return on Assets |
0.54 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
1.73 |
|
Return on Equity |
2.24 |
Acceptable |
Industrial
Average |
3.85 |
Gross Profit Margin used to assess a firm's financial health by
revealing the proportion of money left over from revenues after accounting for
the cost of goods sold. Gross profit margin serves as the source for paying
additional expenses and future savings. The company's figure is 8.4%. When
compared with the industry average, the ratio of the company was lower. This
indicated that company may have problems with control over its costs.
Net Profit Margin is the indicator of the company's efficiency in that
net profit takes into consideration all expenses of the company. A low profit
margin indicates a low margin of safety, higher risk that a decline in sales
will erase profits and result in a net loss. The company's figure is 0.98%.
When compared with the industry average, the ratio of the company was lower.
Return on Assets measures how efficiently profits are being generated
from the assets employed in the business when compared with the ratios of firms
in a similar business. A low ratio in comparison with industry averages
indicates an inefficient use of business assets. When compared with the
industry average, it was lower, the
company's figure is 0.54%.
Return on Equity indicates how profitable a company is by comparing its
net income to its average shareholders' equity, ROE measures how much the
shareholders earned for their investment in the company. When compared with the
industry average, it was lower, the company's figure is 2.24%.
Trend of the average
competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Return on Assets Downtrend
Return on Equity Downtrend
LIQUIDITY : RISKY

LIQUIDITY RATIO
|
Current Ratio |
1.32 |
Satisfactory |
Industrial
Average |
1.51 |
|
Quick Ratio |
0.69 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Conversion Cycle |
151.87 |
|
|
|
The Current Ratio is to ascertain whether a company's short-term assets
are readily available to pay off its short-term liabilities. The company's figure
is 1.32 times in 2012, decreased from 1.46 times, then it is generally
considered to have good short-term financial strength. When compared with the
industry average, the ratio of the company was lower.
The Quick Ratio is a liquidity indicator that further refines the
current ratio by measuring the amount of the most liquid current assets there
are to cover current liabilities. The company's figure is 0.69 times in 2012,
increased from 0.3 times, then the company has not enough current assets that presumably
can be quickly converted to cash for pay financial obligations.
The Cash Conversion Cycle measures the number of days a company's cash
is tied up in the production and sales process of its operations and the
benefit from payment terms from its creditors. It meant the company could
survive when no cash inflow was received from sale for 152 days.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Current Ratio Downtrend
LEVERAGE : RISKY


LEVERAGE RATIO
|
Debt Ratio |
0.87 |
Acceptable |
Industrial
Average |
0.77 |
|
Debt to Equity Ratio |
3.59 |
Risky |
Industrial
Average |
3.27 |
|
Times Interest Earned |
- |
|
Industrial
Average |
- |
Debt to Equity Ratio a measurement of how much suppliers, lenders, creditors
and obligors have committed to the company versus what the shareholders have
committed. A lower the percentage means that the company is using less leverage
and has a stronger equity position.
Debt Ratio shows the proportion of a company's assets which are financed
through debt. The company's figure is 0.87 greater than 0.5, most of the
company's assets are financed through debt.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Debt Ratio Uptrend
Times Interest Earned Downtrend
ACTIVITY :
ACCEPTABLE
ACTIVITY RATIO
|
Fixed Assets Turnover |
174.74 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
- |
|
Total Assets Turnover |
0.56 |
Acceptable |
Industrial
Average |
1.02 |
|
Inventory Conversion Period |
329.77 |
|
|
|
|
Inventory Turnover |
1.11 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
2.22 |
|
Receivables Conversion Period |
339.39 |
|
|
|
|
Receivables Turnover |
1.08 |
Acceptable |
Industrial
Average |
1.85 |
|
Payables Conversion Period |
517.28 |
|
|
|
The company's Account Receivable Ratio is calculated as 1.08 and
Inventory Turnover in Days Ratio indicates the liquidity of inventory.
It estimates the number of days that it will take to sell the current
inventory. Inventory is particularly sensitive to change in business
activities. The inventory turnover in days has decreased from 584 days at the
end of 2011 to 330 days at the end of 2012. This represents a positive trend.
And Inventory turnover has increased from 0.63 times in year 2011 to 1.11 times
in year 2012.
The company's Total Asset Turnover is calculated as 0.56 times and 0.54
times in 2012 and 2011 respectively. This ratio is determined by dividing total
assets into total sales turnover. The ratio measures the activity of the assets
and the ability of the firm to generate sales through the use of the assets.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Fixed Assets Turnover Downtrend
Total Assets Turnover Downtrend
Inventory Turnover Downtrend
Receivables Turnover Downtrend
DIAMOND INDUSTRY – INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world as the birthplace
for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of diamonds but history
says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in India. Diamond
production in India can be traced back to almost 8th Century B.C.
India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th Century
when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of S.
Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was possible only due to
combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian workforce and the
untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires, supported by
progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses derives its importance
from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations which operate in the
diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business enterprises include
spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction costs, small,
nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage and
philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on many fronts including
higher standard of corporate governance, long-term performance – focused
strategies, modern management and technology.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with some medium and
large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious import – export,
inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In the process, several
public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees. They mostly diverted
borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and capital markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th October 2010 is as
under –
-
Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council in its statistical data has
shown the export of polished diamonds to have increase by 28 % in February
2013. Compared to $ 1.4 bn worth of polished diamond export in February, 2012,
India exported $ 1.84 billion worth of polished diamonds in February 2013. A
senior executive of GJEPC said, “Export of cut and polished diamonds started
falling month-wise after the imposition of 2 % of import duty on the polished
diamonds. But February, 2013 has given a new ray of hope to the industry as the
export of polished diamonds has actually increased by 28 %. It means the
industry is on the track of recovery and round tripping of diamonds has
stopped completely.” Demand has started coming from the US, the UK, Japan and
China. India’s polished diamond export is expected to cross $ 21 bn in 2013-14.
-
The banking sector has started exercising restraint while following
prudent risk management norms when lending money to gems and jewellery sector.
This follows the implementation of Basel III accord – a global voluntary
regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy, stress testing and market
liquidity.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.61.98 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.101.49 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.84.79 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Report
Prepared by : |
NIS |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest capability
for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to
overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report.
The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.