|
Report Date : |
07.02.2013 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
Silk Jewelry (Thailand) Co., Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
Gemopolis Industrial Estate, 8/4 Soi Sukhapiban 2 Soi 31, Dokmai, Pravet, Bangkok 10250 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Thailand |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2011 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
13.07.2009 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
0105552068393 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
LINE OF BUSINESS : |
THE SUBJECT
IS ENGAGED IN
MANUFACTURING CONTRACT
VARIOUS KINDS OF
GOLD AND SILVER
JEWELRY PRODUCTS, ACCORDING
TO CUSTOMER’S REQUIREMENT. |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
20 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ca |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Slow |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, ame and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – June 30th, 2012
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.03.2011) |
Current Rating (30.06.2012) |
|
Thailand |
B1 |
B1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
THAILAND - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
With a well-developed infrastructure, a free-enterprise economy, generally pro-investment policies, and strong export industries, Thailand enjoyed solid growth from 2000 to 2007 - averaging more than 4% per year - as it recovered from the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98. Thai exports - mostly machinery and electronic components, agricultural commodities, and jewelry - continue to drive the economy, accounting for more than half of GDP. The global financial crisis of 2008-09 severely cut Thailand's exports, with most sectors experiencing double-digit drops. In 2009, the economy contracted 2.3%. In 2010, Thailand's economy expanded 7.8%, its fastest pace since 1995, as exports rebounded from their depressed 2009 level. Steady economic growth at just below 4% during the first three quarters of 2011 was interrupted by historic flooding in October and November in the industrial areas north of Bangkok, crippling the manufacturing sector and leading to a revised growth rate of only 0.1% for the year. The industrial sector is poised to recover from the second quarter of 2012 onward, however, and the government anticipates the economy will probably grow between 5.5 and 6.5% for 2012, while private sector forecasts range between 3.8% and 5.7%.
Source
: CIA
SILK
JEWELRY [THAILAND] CO.,
LTD.
BUSINESS
ADDRESS : GEMOPOLIS INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE,
8/4 SOI
SUKHAPIBAN 2 SOI
31, DOKMAI,
PRAVET, BANGKOK
10250, THAILAND
TELEPHONE : [66] 2727-0977-8,
086 772-4068
FAX :
[66] 2727-0979
E-MAIL
ADDRESS : silkjewelry-thai@hotmail.com
REGISTRATION
ADDRESS : SAME
AS BUSINESS ADDRESS
ESTABLISHED
: 2009
REGISTRATION
NO. : 0105552068393
TAX
ID NO. : 3033529654
CAPITAL REGISTERED : BHT. 11,000,000
CAPITAL PAID-UP : BHT.
11,000,000
SHAREHOLDER’S PROPORTION : SOUTH
KOREAN : 100%
FISCAL YEAR CLOSING DATE : DECEMBER 31
LEGAL
STATUS : PRIVATE LIMITED
COMPANY
EXECUTIVE : MR. KIM ZI KIANG, SOUTH
KOREAN
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.
OF STAFF : 20
LINES
OF BUSINESS : GOLD
AND SILVER JEWELRY
PRODUCTS
CONTRACTED MANUFACTURER
OPERATING
TREND : STABLE
PRESENT
SITUATION : OPERATING NORMALLY
REPUTATION : FAIR
WITH NORMAL BUSINESS
ENGAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
STANDARD : MANAGEMENT WITH
LOW PERFORMANCE
The
subject was established
on July 13,
2009 as a
private limited company under
the registered name
SILK JEWELRY [THAILAND]
CO., LTD., by
South Korean groups,
with the business
objective to provide
manufacturing contract various
kinds of gold
and silver jewelry
products to both
domestic and international
markets. It currently
employs approximate 20
staff.
The
subject is also a
subsidiary of Silk Jewelry
Co., Ltd., in
South Korea.
The
subject’s registered address
is Gemopolis Industrial
Estate, 8/4 Soi
Sukhapiban 2 Soi 31,
Dokmai, Pravet, Bangkok
10250, and this
is the subject’s
current operation address.
Mr. Kim Zi Kiang
The above director
signs on behalf
of the subject
with company’s affixed.
Mr. Kim Zi Kiang
is the Managing
Director.
He is South
Korean nationality with
the age of
53 years old.
The subject
is engaged in
manufacturing contract
various kinds of
gold and silver
jewelry products, according
to customer’s requirement.
PURCHASE
Raw
materials and components
are purchased from
suppliers both domestic
and overseas, mainly
in Korea.
MAJOR
SUPPLIER
Silk
Jewelry Co., Ltd. : South
Korea
SALES
The products are
sold to customers
both local and
overseas, in South
Korea, Japan, U.S.A.,
U.K., France and
India.
The subject is
not found to
have any subsidiary
or affiliated company
here in Thailand.
Bankruptcy and
Receivership
There are no
litigation on bankruptcy
and receivership cases
filed against the
subject found at
Legal Execution Department
for the past
five years.
Others
There are no
legal suits filed
against the subject
for the past two years.
Sales are by
cash or on
the credits term
of 30-60 days.
Local bills are
paid by cash
or on the
credits term of
30-60 days.
Imports are by
L/C at sight
or T/T.
Exports are against
T/T.
The
banker’s name was
not disclosed.
The
subject currently employs
approximately 20 staff.
The
premise is rented for
administrative office and
factory at the
heading address. Premise
is located in
jewelry industrial area.
The subject
operates as a manufacturing
contract of gold and silver jewelry
products. While its
sales were moderate,
but operating resulted
were ended with loss
for many consecutive
years. Overall growth
is relatively slow.
The
capital was registered
at Bht. 10,000,000
divided into 100,000
shares of Bht.
100 each with
fully paid.
On
November 4, 2010,
registered capital was
increased to Bht. 11,000,000 divided
into 110,000 shares
of Bht. 100 each
with fully paid.
THE
SHAREHOLDERS LISTED WERE
: [as at
April 30, 2012]
|
NAME |
HOLDING |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Silk Jewelry Co.,
Ltd. Nationality: South Korean Address : 901
Wolgye Technotown, 562
Wolgye,
2-Dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul,
South Korea |
100,000 |
90.91 |
|
Mr. Kim Zi Kiang Nationality: South Korean Address : Inson,
South Korea |
9,999 |
9.09 |
|
Ms. Kanittha Thongdaeng Nationality: Thai Address : 142/16
Moo 5, T. Nong-Iroon, A.
Banbueng, Chonburi |
1 |
- |
Total Shareholders : 3
Share Structure [as
at April 30,
2012]
|
Nationality |
Shareholders |
No. of Share |
% Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thai |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
Foreign-South Korean |
2 |
109,999 |
100.00 |
|
Total |
3 |
110,000 |
100.00 |
NAME OF AUDITOR
& CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANT NO. :
Ms. Siriporn Rungroj
No. 9389
The latest financial figures published
as at December
31, 2011, 2010
& 2009 were:
ASSETS
|
Current Assets |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
263,336.82 |
586,938.48 |
499,231.13 |
|
Trade Accounts & Other
Receivable |
6,402,309.93 |
11,243,474.81 |
- |
|
Inventories |
57,660.00 |
85,985.00 |
- |
|
Other Current Assets
|
- |
- |
700,829.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
6,723,306.75 |
11,916,398.29 |
1,200,060.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Assets |
5,259,691.52 |
7,111,591.96 |
8,890,241.60 |
|
Total Assets |
11,982,998.27 |
19,027,990.25 |
10,090,301.73 |
LIABILITIES &
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY [BAHT]
|
Current Liabilities |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Accounts &
Other Payable |
271,867.62 |
249,011.73 |
- |
|
Short-term Loan from Person or Related Company |
12,834,922.26 |
11,226,928.94 |
9,834,735.00 |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
- |
- |
323,825.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
13,106,789.88 |
11,475,940.67 |
10,158,560.68 |
|
Total Liabilities |
13,106,789.88 |
11,475,940.67 |
10,158,560.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital : Baht 100
par value authorized, issued
and fully paid share
capital 110,000 shares in 2011
& 2010; 100,000 shares
in 2009 respectively |
11,000,000.00 |
11,000,000.00 |
10,000,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Paid |
11,000,000.00 |
11,000,000.00 |
2,500,000.00 |
|
Retained Earning Unappropriated |
[12,123,791.61] |
[3,447,950.42] |
[2,568,258.95] |
|
Total Shareholders' Equity |
[1,123,791.61] |
7,552,049.58 |
[68,258.95] |
|
Total Liabilities &
Shareholders' Equity |
11,982,998.27 |
19,027,990.25 |
10,090,301.73 |
|
Revenue |
2011 |
2010 |
July 13,
2009 – Dec.
31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Income |
19,979,564.25 |
13,060,465.21 |
607,182.28 |
|
Other Income |
530,762.01 |
915.88 |
689.75 |
|
Total Revenues |
20,510,326.26 |
13,061,381.09 |
607,872.03 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Service |
26,315,956.08 |
9,255,906.82 |
2,138,869.51 |
|
Administrative Expenses |
2,870,211.37 |
4,685,165.74 |
1,037,261.47 |
|
Total Expenses |
29,186,167.45 |
13,941,072.56 |
3,176,130.98 |
|
Profit / [Loss] before Income
Tax |
[8,675,841.19] |
[879,691.47] |
[2,568,258.95] |
|
Income Tax |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit / [Loss] |
[8,675,841.19] |
[879,691.47] |
[2,568,258.95] |
|
ITEM |
UNIT |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT RATIO |
TIMES |
0.51 |
1.04 |
0.12 |
|
QUICK RATIO |
TIMES |
0.51 |
1.03 |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
3.80 |
1.84 |
0.07 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
1.67 |
0.69 |
0.06 |
|
INVENTORY CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
0.80 |
3.39 |
- |
|
INVENTORY TURNOVER |
TIMES |
456.40 |
107.65 |
- |
|
RECEIVABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
116.96 |
314.22 |
- |
|
RECEIVABLES TURNOVER |
TIMES |
3.12 |
1.16 |
- |
|
PAYABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
3.77 |
9.82 |
- |
|
CASH CONVERSION CYCLE |
DAYS |
113.99 |
307.79 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFITABILITY
RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
% |
131.71 |
70.87 |
352.26 |
|
SELLING & ADMINISTRATION |
% |
14.37 |
35.87 |
170.83 |
|
INTEREST |
% |
- |
- |
- |
|
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
(29.06) |
29.14 |
(252.15) |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN BEFORE EX. ITEM |
% |
(43.42) |
(6.74) |
(422.98) |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
(43.42) |
(6.74) |
(422.98) |
|
RETURN ON EQUITY |
% |
- |
(11.65) |
- |
|
RETURN ON ASSET |
% |
(72.40) |
(4.62) |
(25.45) |
|
EARNING PER SHARE |
BAHT |
(78.87) |
(8.00) |
(102.73) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVERAGE RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
DEBT RATIO |
TIMES |
1.09 |
0.60 |
1.01 |
|
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO |
TIMES |
(11.66) |
1.52 |
(148.82) |
|
TIME INTEREST EARNED |
TIMES |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL GROWTH |
|
|
|
|
|
SALES GROWTH |
% |
52.98 |
2,051.00 |
|
|
OPERATING PROFIT |
% |
886.24 |
(65.75) |
|
|
NET PROFIT |
% |
(886.24) |
65.75 |
|
|
FIXED ASSETS |
% |
(26.04) |
(20.01) |
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
% |
(37.02) |
88.58 |
|
ANNUAL GROWTH :
ACCEPTABLE
An annual sales growth is 52.98%. Turnover has increased from THB
13,060,465.21 in 2010 to THB 19,979,564.25 in 2011. While net profit has
decreased from THB -879,691.47 in 2010 to THB -8,675,841.19 in 2011. And total
assets has decreased from THB 19,027,990.25 in 2010 to THB 11,982,998.27 in
2011.
PROFITABILITY :
RISKY
%20CO%20,%20LTD%20%20-%20209428%2007-Feb-2013_files/image002.gif)
PROFITABILITY
RATIO
|
Gross Profit Margin |
(29.06) |
Deteriorated |
Industrial Average |
15.83 |
|
Net Profit Margin |
(43.42) |
Deteriorated |
Industrial Average |
0.22 |
|
Return on Assets |
(72.40) |
Deteriorated |
Industrial Average |
0.24 |
|
Return on Equity |
- |
|
Industrial Average |
0.39 |
Gross Profit Margin used to assess a firm's financial health by revealing
the proportion of money left over from revenues after accounting for the cost
of goods sold. Gross profit margin serves as the source for paying additional
expenses and future savings. The company's figure is -29.06%. When compared
with the industry average, the ratio of the company was lower, this indicated
that company may have problems with control over its costs.
Net Profit Margin is the indicator of the company's efficiency in that
net profit takes into consideration all expenses of the company. A low profit
margin indicates a low margin of safety, higher risk that a decline in sales
will erase profits and result in a net loss. The company's figure is -43.42%.
When compared with the industry average, the ratio of the company was lower.
Return on Assets measures how efficiently profits are being generated
from the assets employed in the business when compared with the ratios of firms
in a similar business. A low ratio in comparison with industry averages
indicates an inefficient use of business assets. When compared with the
industry average, it was lower, the company's figure is -72.4%.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Return on Assets Downtrend
Return on Equity Downtrend
LIQUIDITY : RISKY
%20CO%20,%20LTD%20%20-%20209428%2007-Feb-2013_files/image004.gif)
LIQUIDITY RATIO
|
Current Ratio |
0.51 |
Risky |
Industrial Average |
1.69 |
|
Quick Ratio |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Conversion Cycle |
113.99 |
|
|
|
The Current Ratio is to ascertain whether a company's short-term assets are
readily available to pay off its short-term liabilities. The company's figure
is 0.51 times in 2011, decreased from 1.04 times, then the company may not be
efficiently using its current assets. When compared with the industry average,
the ratio of the company was lower.
The Quick Ratio is a liquidity indicator that further refines the
current ratio by measuring the amount of the most liquid current assets there
are to cover current liabilities. The company's figure is 0.51 times in 2011,
decreased from 1.03 times, then the company has not enough current assets that
presumably can be quickly converted to cash for pay financial obligations.
The Cash Conversion Cycle measures the number of days a company's cash
is tied up in the production and sales process of its operations and the
benefit from payment terms from its creditors. It meant the company could
survive when no cash inflow was received from sale for 114 days.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Current Ratio Uptrend
LEVERAGE : RISKY
%20CO%20,%20LTD%20%20-%20209428%2007-Feb-2013_files/image006.gif)
LEVERAGE RATIO
|
Debt Ratio |
1.09 |
Risky |
Industrial Average |
0.56 |
|
Debt to Equity Ratio |
(11.66) |
Risky |
Industrial Average |
1.31 |
|
Times Interest Earned |
- |
|
Industrial Average |
0.96 |
Debt to Equity Ratio a measurement of how much suppliers, lenders,
creditors and obligors have committed to the company versus what the
shareholders have committed. A higher the percentage means that the company is
using less equity and has stronger leverage position.
Debt Ratio shows the proportion of a company's assets which are financed
through debt. The company's figure is 1.09 greater than 0.5, most of the
company's assets are financed through debt.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Debt Ratio Downtrend
Times Interest Earned Downtrend
ACTIVITY :
IMPRESSIVE
%20CO%20,%20LTD%20%20-%20209428%2007-Feb-2013_files/image008.gif)
ACTIVITY RATIO
|
Fixed Assets Turnover |
3.80 |
Satisfactory |
Industrial Average |
4.89 |
|
Total Assets Turnover |
1.67 |
Impressive |
Industrial Average |
1.36 |
|
Inventory Conversion Period |
0.80 |
|
|
|
|
Inventory Turnover |
456.40 |
Impressive |
Industrial Average |
2.04 |
|
Receivables Conversion Period |
116.96 |
|
|
|
|
Receivables Turnover |
3.12 |
Satisfactory |
Industrial Average |
3.46 |
|
Payables Conversion Period |
3.77 |
|
|
|
The company's Account Receivable Ratio is calculated as 3.12 and 1.16 in
2011 and 2010 respectively. This ratio measures the efficiency of the company in
managing its trade debtors to generate revenue. A lower ratio may indicate over
extension and collection problems. Conversely, a higher ratio may indicate an
overtly stringent policy. In this case, the company's A/R ratio in 2011
increased from 2010. This would suggest the company had good performance in the
management of its debt collections.
Inventory Turnover in Days Ratio indicates the liquidity of inventory.
It estimates the number of days that it will take to sell the current
inventory. Inventory is particularly sensitive to change in business
activities. The inventory turnover in days has decreased from 3 days at the end
of 2010 to 1 day at the end of 2011. This represents a positive trend. And
Inventory turnover has increased from 107.65 times in year 2010 to 456.4 times
in year 2011.
The company's Total Asset Turnover is calculated as 1.67 times and 0.69
times in 2011 and 2010 respectively. This ratio is determined by dividing total
assets into total sales turnover. The ratio measures the activity of the assets
and the ability of the firm to generate sales through the use of the assets.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Fixed Assets Turnover Downtrend
Total Assets Turnover Downtrend
Inventory Turnover Downtrend
Receivables Turnover Downtrend
DIAMOND INDUSTRY –
INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world
as the birthplace for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of diamonds
but history says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in India.
Diamond production in India can be traced back to almost 8th Century
B.C. India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th
Century when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of
S. Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was
possible only due to combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian
workforce and the untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires,
supported by progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses
derives its importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations
which operate in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business
enterprises include spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction
costs, small, nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage
and philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on
many fronts including higher standard of corporate governance, long-term
performance – focused strategies, modern management and technology.
-
The diamond jewellery industry in India today may be
more than Rs 60000 mil and is rated amongst the fastest growing in the
world. Indi ranks third in the world in domestic diamond consumption.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with
some medium and large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious
import – export, inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In
the process, several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees.
They mostly diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and
capital markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th
October 2010 is as under –
DIAMOND
SAGA – DIRTY DOZEN STUCK WITH 2K CR DEBT
This could be the biggest credibility crisis
the Indian diamond industry has ever faced. Fifteen banks run the risk of
losing Rs 2000 crore lent to a dozen diamond firms in Surat. Until about two
months ago, they had not repaid these dues. Bankers believe many
diamantaires borrowed money during the economic downturn two years ago and
diverted funds to businesses like real estate and capital markets. Many of
themselves made money from these businesses but their diamond companies have
gone sick and declared insolvency.
-
Most of the money borrowed from the banks in the name
of their diamond business has been diverted in real estate and the share
market. The banks are not in a position to seize their properties because in
many cases, these were purchased in the name of their relatives and friends.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.53.09 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.83.12 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.72.02 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Report
Prepared by : |
NIT |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest capability
for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report.
The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any risk
and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL) or its
officials.