|
Report Date : |
07.01.2013 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
ALBEMARLE
CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
451 Florida
Street Baton Rouge, LA 70801 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
United States |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2011 |
|
|
|
|
Year of Incorporation : |
1993 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Public Parent |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Manufacture of plastics in primary forms |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
4,000 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRAs Rating : |
A |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
Status : |
Good |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Regular |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List June 30th, 2012
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.03.2011) |
Current Rating (30.06.2012) |
|
United States |
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
UNITED STATES - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
The US has the largest and most technologically powerful
economy in the world, with a per capita GDP of $49,800. In this market-oriented
economy, private individuals and business firms make most of the decisions, and
the federal and state governments buy needed goods and services predominantly
in the private marketplace. US business firms enjoy greater flexibility than
their counterparts in Western Europe and Japan in decisions to expand capital
plant, to lay off surplus workers, and to develop new products. At the same
time, they face higher barriers to enter their rivals' home markets than
foreign firms face entering US markets. US firms are at or near the forefront
in technological advances, especially in computers and in medical, aerospace,
and military equipment; their advantage has narrowed since the end of World War
II. The onrush of technology largely explains the gradual development of a
"two-tier labor market" in which those at the bottom lack the
education and the professional/technical skills of those at the top and, more
and more, fail to get comparable pay raises, health insurance coverage, and
other benefits. Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have
gone to the top 20% of households. Since 1996, dividends and capital gains have
grown faster than wages or any other category of after-tax income. Imported oil
accounts for nearly 55% of US consumption. Crude oil prices doubled between
2001 and 2006, the year home prices peaked; higher gasoline prices ate into
consumers' budgets and many individuals fell behind in their mortgage payments.
Oil prices climbed another 50% between 2006 and 2008, and bank foreclosures
more than doubled in the same period. In addition to dampening the housing
market, soaring oil prices caused a drop in the value of the dollar and a deterioration
in the US merchandise trade deficit, which peaked at $840 billion in 2008. The
sub-prime mortgage crisis, falling home prices, investment bank failures, tight
credit, and the global economic downturn pushed the United States into a
recession by mid-2008. GDP contracted until the third quarter of 2009, making
this the deepest and longest downturn since the Great Depression. To help
stabilize financial markets, in October 2008 the US Congress established a $700
billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). The government used some of these
funds to purchase equity in US banks and industrial corporations, much of which
had been returned to the government by early 2011. In January 2009 the US
Congress passed and President Barack OBAMA signed a bill providing an
additional $787 billion fiscal stimulus to be used over 10 years - two-thirds
on additional spending and one-third on tax cuts - to create jobs and to help
the economy recover. In 2010 and 2011, the federal budget deficit reached
nearly 9% of GDP. Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan required major shifts in
national resources from civilian to military purposes and contributed to the
growth of the budget deficit and public debt. Through 2011, direct costs of the
wars totaled nearly $900 billion, according to US government figures. US
revenues from taxes and other sources are lower, as a percentage of GDP, than
those of most other countries. In March 2010, President OBAMA signed into law
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a health insurance reform that
will extend coverage to an additional 32 million American citizens by 2016,
through private health insurance for the general population and Medicaid for
the impoverished. Total spending on health care - public plus private - rose
from 9.0% of GDP in 1980 to 17.9% in 2010. In July 2010, the president signed
the DODD-FRANK Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, a law designed
to promote financial stability by protecting consumers from financial abuses,
ending taxpayer bailouts of financial firms, dealing with troubled banks that
are "too big to fail," and improving accountability and transparency
in the financial system - in particular, by requiring certain financial
derivatives to be traded in markets that are subject to government regulation
and oversight. Long-term problems include stagnation of wages for lower-income
families, inadequate investment in deteriorating infrastructure, rapidly rising
medical and pension costs of an aging population, energy shortages, and sizable
current account and budget deficits - including significant budget shortages
for state governments.
Source : CIA
Albemarle Corporation
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business Description
|
Albemarle Corporation (Albemarle) is a
developer, manufacturer and marketer of specialty chemicals, which meet
customer needs across a range of end markets, including the petroleum
refining, consumer electronics, plastics/packaging, construction, automotive,
lubricants, pharmaceuticals, crop protection, food-safety and custom
chemistry services markets. As of December 31, 2011, the Company and its
joint ventures operated 50 facilities, encompassing production, research and
development facilities, and administrative and sales offices in North and
South America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, Africa and Australia. It serves
approximately 3,000 customers in over 100 countries. It operates in three
segments: Polymer Solutions, Catalysts and Fine Chemistry. On May 11, 2011,
the Company acquired Catilin Inc. For the nine months ended 30 September
2012, Albemarle Corporation revenues decreased 5% to $2.06B. Net income
decreased 27% to $245.2M. Revenues reflect Polymer Solutions segment decrease
of 13% to $692.1M, Catalysts segment decrease of 6% to $773.9M. Net income
also reflects Polymer Solutions segment income decrease of 23% to $157.5M,
Catalysts segment income decrease of 11% to $185.7M. Dividend per share
increased from $0.50 to $0.60. |
Industry
|
Industry |
|
|
ANZSIC 2006: |
|
|
NACE 2002: |
|
|
NAICS 2002: |
|
|
UK SIC 2003: |
|
|
UK SIC 2007: |
|
|
US SIC 1987: |
2821 - Plastics Materials, Synthetic Resins, and
Nonvulcanizable Elastomers |
|
|
|
Key Executives
(Emails Available)
|
Significant Developments
|
Financial Summary
|
|
|
Stock Snapshot
|
|
1 - Profit & Loss Item Exchange Rate: USD 1 = USD 1
2 - Balance Sheet Item Exchange Rate: USD 1 = USD 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Albemarle Corporation The Strategic Initiatives report is created
using technology to extract meaningful insights from analyst reports about a
company's strategic projects and investments. More about Strategic Initiatives
|
|
Key Organizational Changes |
|
|
Ltd., Albemarle China Corporation,
Albemarle Overseas Development Corporation, Albemarle Korea Corp., and
Albemarle Asia Pacific Company. In May 2011, the company completed the
acquisition of Catilin, Inc., a biodiesel production company.GlobalData uses
a range of research techniques to gather and verify its information and
analysis. These include primary research, in-house knowledge and expertise,
proprietary databases, and secondary sources such as company websites, annual
reports, SEC filings and press releases. Disclaimer: No part of this
publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in
any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or
otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher, GlobalData. |
|
|
Scott Martin has been promoted to vice
president, fine chemistry. In this role, Martin will be responsible for
creating and executing strategy for this global business unit and for driving
the group's financial results. He joined Albemarle in 2001 through the
acquisition of custom and fine chemicals company, ChemFirst Fine Chemicals,
and subsequently consolidated the company's agricultural and pharmaceutical
products into the fine chemistry services division. Four years later, he
became division vice president of polyolefin catalysts (now re-named
performance catalyst solutions) where he served until he assumed
responsibility for the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts and additives
division in 2007. Most recently, he served as vice president, hydro
processing catalysts. |
|
|
Resource Management |
|
|
Most recently, he served as vice president,
polymer solutions. John Nicols has been promoted to senior vice president,
strategic development and catalysts. In this expanded role, he will continue
to oversee all aspects of the Catalysts global business unit's performance,
and he will also assume responsibility for Albemarle's strategy to expand its
business through adjacency opportunities as the company implements its Vision
2015 growth strategy. Nicols joined Albemarle (then Ethyl Corporation) in
February 1990 and has held a wide variety of global positions with increasing
responsibility during his tenure with the company. He served as vice
president, fine chemistry and vice president, flame retardants. |
|
|
Sales and Distribution |
|
|
Most recently, he served as vice president,
global sales and service. Scott Martin has been promoted to vice president,
fine chemistry. In this role, Martin will be responsible for creating and
executing strategy for this global business unit and for driving the group's
financial results. He joined Albemarle in 2001 through the acquisition of
custom and fine chemicals company, ChemFirst Fine Chemicals, and subsequently
consolidated the company's agricultural and pharmaceutical products into the
fine chemistry services division. Four years later, he became division vice
president of polyolefin catalysts (now re-named performance catalyst
solutions) where he served until he assumed responsibility for the fluid
catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts and additives division in 2007. |
|
|
In this role, Steitz will oversee all
aspects of the company's operations, including global responsibility for
manufacturing, supply chain, sales and health, safety and environmental.Luke
Kissam, CEO of Albemarle, said, "John is a recognized leader in the
specialty chemicals arena and has served Albemarle with incredible leadership
and dedication. With a deep knowledge of both our businesses and the chemical
industry and a true passion for executing our strategies, he is the ideal fit
for this position. I look forward to continuing to work with John to deliver
on our future growth strategy." An industry veteran with nearly 30 years
of experience in business management and administration activities, Steitz
joined Albemarle in July 2000 and served in various roles of increasing
responsibility during his tenure with the company. Most recently, he served
as executive vice president and COO. |
|
|
Albemarle Corporation (Albemarle) carries out
the development, manufacture, and marketing of highly-engineered specialty
chemicals. The company’s products are used in applications such as consumer
electronics, utilities, petroleum refining, packaging, construction,
pharmaceuticals, automotive/transportation, crop protection, foodsafety and
custom chemistry services. The company offers a wide range of products through
reportable business segments, namely, Polymer Solutions, Catalysts and Fine
Chemistry. Its operational and geographical diversity enables the company to
cater to broader markets and reduce the risks associated with adverse economic
and political developments in any particular region. However, increasing
competitive risks could be detrimental to its operations, if the company fails
to evaluate them properly.
The company has been engaged in acquisitions
and joint ventures, including the consequent integration of acquired businesses
over the last three years. These acquisitions resulted in the expansion of the
company’s base business. The company’s acquired business offered a wider
array of products to its customers and new alternatives for discovery through
additional chemistries. In May 2011, the company acquired Catilin, Inc. Catilin
carries out the development and application of heterogeneous biodiesel
catalysis. Through the acquisition, the company expands its presence in the
biofuels market. The addition of Catilin's technology and products will
strengthen the company’s offerings for the renewable fuels market. The
company could also gain from the R&D and distribution synergies as a result
of the acquisition.
The company’s strong financial performance
coupled with increasing profit margins in 2011 indicates the company’s
operational efficiency. The company reported improved operational performance
for the fiscal year 2011. Albemarle reported total revenue and operating income
of $2,869.01m and $ 587.84m in 2011, an increase of 21.43% and 41.7%
respectively, over that in 2010. The increased revenue in 2011 was due to
increased volumes in all the segments as a result of the improved market
conditions and favorable price/mix. In 2011, the segmental revenue of Polymer
Solutions, Catalysts and Fine Chemistry grew by 11%, 25% and 32% respectively,
compared to that in 2010. The company reported strong operational efficiency
with decreased cost and increased operating margins. The company reported
increased operating margin of 20.48% in 2011, as compared to 17.55% in 2010.
The operating margin increased 293 basis points (bps) over 2010 which indicates
management's high focus on improving profitability. It also implies efficient
cost management or a strong pricing strategy by the company. The company’s
gross margin increased 34.05% in 2011 from 31.57% in 2010. Its net profit
margin also increased 15.2% in 2011 from 13.7% in 2010. The company reduced its
operating cost as percentage of sales to 79.51% in 2011 from 82.44% in 2010.
The company’s continuous cost restructuring and efficiency improvement
efforts have resulted in significant savings and cost competitiveness in almost
all areas thereby enabling it to take full advantage of the recovery in the
economy.
The operational and geographical diversity
makes the company less exposed to the risk of excessive dependence on any
single segment, industry, or market. The company operates through three
reportable business segments, namely, Polymer Solutions, Catalysts and Fine
Chemistry. Polymer Solutions segment offers flame retardants, stabilizers and
curatives. These products are sold to chemical manufacturers and processors,
including lubricant manufacturers, polymer resin suppliers, refiners and other
specialty chemical companies. Catalysts segment offers refinery catalysts and
polyolefin catalysts. The key customers of the company’s catalysts include
multinational corporations, independent petroleum refining companies and
national petroleum refining companies. The company’s Fine Chemistry segment
offers performance chemicals and fine chemistry services and intermediates. The
segment produces more than 100 products which are applied in end-markets, such
as, chemical manufacturers and processors, including pharmaceutical,
agricultural, drilling and oil services, water treatment and photographic
companies, and other specialty chemical companies. For the fiscal year ended
2011, the Catalysts segment accounted for 38.9% of the company’s total
revenue, followed by Polymer Solutions with 34.9% and Fine Chemistry with
26.2%. Geographically, Albemarle operates through two segments, namely, US and
Foreign. For the fiscal year ended 2011, the company earned 38.57% from the US
segment, while the Foreign segment accounted for 61.43% of its total revenues.
The company serves around 3,000 customers in over 100 countries throughout the world.
Albemarle along with its joint ventures operates facilities that include
production, research and development facilities, and administrative and sales
offices in North America, South America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia.
Diversified business operations provide the company an advantage over its
competitors, besides serving the diverse needs of its customer base.
Involvement in litigation adds to costs,
which could have an adverse impact on the operations and financial position of
the company. The company received a Notice of Violation (NOV) in July, 2006
from the EPA Region 4. The notice was regarding the implementation of the
Pharmaceutical Maximum Achievable Control Technology standards at its plant in
Orangeburg, South Carolina. Currently, the company is in discussions with the
EPA to resolve the allegations related to NOV. The outcome of this litigation
is still pending and unpredictable. Additionally, the company is also involved
in legal proceedings during its ordinary course of business from time to time.
Other legal proceedings against the company include administrative or judicial
proceedings which seek remediation under environmental laws, such as superfund,
products liability and premises liability litigations. Such litigations,
regardless of the outcome, drain the financial resources and divert the time
and effort spent by the management.
Declining liquidity assumes significance as
the company will be compelled to spend a significant amount of money to enhance
its business and revenue stream. The company reported a decline in all the
liquidity ratios. Its liquidity ratios decreased due to the increase in current
liabilities. Its total current liabilities increased to $401.18m in the fiscal year
2011 from $364.18m in 2010. This led to a marginal decline in its liquidity
indicators such as current ratio and quick ratio. In 2011, it reported current
ratio of 3.37 times as against 3.7 times in 2010, followed by quick ratio of
2.3 times as against 2.6 times in 2010. The declining current ratio indicates
that the company is in a weak position to meet its short-term obligations. The
company also reported a decrease in cash and cash equivalents in fiscal year
2011. The company had $469.42m in cash and cash equivalents as of December,
2011, as compared to cash and cash equivalents of $529.65m in 2010. The
decreasing cash reserves indicate the company’s inability to obtain
additional debt to finance acquisitions, capture business opportunities and meet
capital expenditure or other capital requirements in the future.
Growth Opportunities in
Emerging Markets
The company could benefit through its
presence in the emerging markets, which have created ample opportunities for
the chemical industry over the past decade. Strong growth is expected in the
emerging countries of Asia-Pacific, Africa, the Middle East, Eastern Europe and
Latin America. Although the economic crisis dampened the growth of the chemical
industry in the recent past, it continues to grow at a higher rate, as compared
to that in the developed countries of Europe and North America. According to
the American Chemistry Council (ACC) estimates, chemical output in China
increased sevenfold over the past 10 years. China is expected to overtake the
US and become the largest chemical market by 2011. Global chemical production
grew by 4.8% in 2011. Emerging markets are expected to account for 60% of the
global chemical production by 2020. These countries are expected to record
higher growth and lead the world as major producers of chemicals. Thus, the
company could benefit by expanding its presence in the emerging markets.
Expansion of operations allows the company to
enhance its presence in the leading and developing markets. In May 2012,
Albemarle opened a shared services center in Dalian, China. Through this
center, the company serves the customers in the Asia-Pacific region. In May
2012, the company launched a new antimicrobial used in meat processing. This
new product expands the company's food safety portfolio. In April 2012, the
company expanded its Earthwise product line by the introduction of a new
polymeric flame retardant used in extruded (XPS) and expanded (EPS) polystyrene
procedures. In January 2012, the company established a new business unit,
Electronic Materials business unit. Through this new unit, the company could
strengthen its presence in the LED and solar markets. In January 2012,
Albemarle installed a new production train for finished polyolefin catalysts
and a number of supporting auxiliaries. In September 2011, the company
established a new division, Albemarle Environmental Division. The division
focuses its resources within the air pollution control industry. In October
2011, the company opened a new environmental research and development
laboratory in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The new facility allows the Albemarle
Environmental Division to expand its capabilities into multi-pollutant control.
In November 2011, the company in partnership with Southern Microbiological
Services opened a new Research and Development Microbiology lab in Baton Rouge,
Louisiana. Such expansion initiatives expand the company's reach in existing
and new markets, and increase its revenue.
The company augments its existing businesses
with its complementary and strategic partnerships. In August 2011, the company
entered into a manufacturing agreement to supply base oils to Novvi S.A. Through
this agreement, the company’s Fine Chemistry Services Division serves as a
custom scale-up and production partner which supplies synthetic, renewable base
oils for the lubricants market. In April 2011, the company’s joint venture
with SABIC affiliate, Saudi Specialty Chemical Company, Saudi Organometallic
Chemicals Company (SOCC) selected Samsung Engineering to provide engineering,
procurement, and construction (EPC) services for the Aluminum Alkyls
manufacturing facility of SOCC in Jubail, Saudi Arabia. Strategic agreements
provide various opportunities for the company’s international expansion and
also strengthen its competitiveness.
Challenge of
Environmental Regulations
The company could be affected by the
environmental regulations governing the global chemical industry. REACH
(Registration Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals), in Europe, is an
example of the stringent environmental regulations that impact chemical
producers. REACH regulates the products manufactured and marketed in Europe.
Phased over a period of 11 years, the regulation mandates all companies to
develop and submit dossiers containing datasets about their chemical products
and detail their potential impact and risk on environment. Such regulations
could impede the launch of new products as the process is time-consuming and
expensive. It may also result in phasing out many existing chemicals from the
market, which are regarded as toxic and hazardous. REACH applies directly to
over 30,000 different chemical substances that are produced or sold in Europe
and its implementation is expected to cost European chemical industry about $3
billion. Other countries too are expected to model their regulations on the
principles of REACH. The US already began implementing similar regulations with
the reform of Toxic Substances Control Act. China has its own version: RoHS
(Restriction of Hazardous Substances), which restricts the use of certain
chemicals in the market. Such tough environmental regulations are expected to
become more stringent in the future, affecting both the existing and new
products of the company.
Raw Material Procurement
Risks
The increasing prices of raw materials could
affect the company’s business. Raw material prices constitute a significant
part of the production cost of the company. The company uses various raw
materials for many of its products. Albemarle uses key raw materials such as
bromine, phenol, bisphenol-A, caustic soda, benzene, phosphorus oxychloride,
alumina trihydrate, isobutylene, polystyrene and phosphorous derivatives in its
Polymer Solutions operations. Albemarle’s Catalysts operations use major raw
materials such as aluminum, alpha olefins, ethylene, sodium silicate,
molybdenum, sodium aluminate, rare earths, kaolin, nickel and cobalt. Fine
Chemical segment uses raw materials such as potassium chloride, aluminum
chloride, ammonia, chlorine, methyl amines alpha olefins and propylene. The
prices of chemical products are influenced by fluctuations in crude oil prices.
Competition also limits the option of increasing product prices to compensate
for the higher production costs. In addition, the continuous supply of the raw
materials could be affected by weather conditions, national emergencies,
strikes, governmental controls, natural disasters, supply shortages or other
events. Thus, price fluctuations and non-availability of these raw materials
may have a material effect on the product costs and the operations of the
company.
Increased competition may lead the company to
reduce its prices, which could negatively affect its margins. The company
operates in a highly competitive chemical industry. Albemarle competes against
various domestic and foreign specialty chemical producers. The company’s key
competitors in its polymer segment include Chemtura Corporation, Israel
Chemicals Ltd., Jiangsu Yoke Technology Co., Ltd., M. Huber Corporation, Kyowa
Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Wansheng Chemical Co., Ltd., Nabaltec
GmbH, BASF Corporation and Songwon Industrial Co., Ltd. In its Catalysts
segment, the company competes with companies such as Criterion Catalysts and
Technologies, W.R. Grace & Co./Advanced Refining Technologies, Akzo Nobel
N.V., Haldor Topsoe, Chemtura Corporation and Tosoh Corporation. The Fine
Chemistry segment competes with companies such as Chemtura Corporation, Israel
Chemicals, Lonza, BASF Corporation, Cilag AG and Clariant Ltd. The company
operates in a progressively more complex and challenging chemical marketplace
whose dynamics are ever-changing. Technological advances by any player in the
market could render its present or future products obsolete or uneconomical.
The existing market includes companies of varying sizes; some more specialized
than the company with respect to particular commodities, and some with greater
financial resources than the company. The company competes in this evolving
marketplace on the basis of many factors, including price, quality, innovation,
service, reputation, distribution and promotion.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Albemarle
Corporation
Total Corporate Family Members: 32
|
Company Name |
Company Type |
Location |
Country |
Industry |
Sales |
Employees |
|
Parent |
Baton Rouge, LA |
United States |
Chemicals - Plastics and Rubber |
2,869.0 |
4,000 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Bergheim, Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany |
Chemical Manufacturing |
424.0 |
540 |
|
|
Joint Venture |
Breitenau |
Austria |
Chemical Manufacturing |
44.5 |
54 |
|
|
Branch |
Baton Rouge, LA |
United States |
Chemical Manufacturing |
1,583.2 |
500 |
|
|
Branch |
Houston, TX |
United States |
Chemical Manufacturing |
721.2 |
475 |
|
|
Branch |
Pasadena, TX |
United States |
Chemical Manufacturing |
721.2 |
475 |
|
|
Branch |
Magnolia, AR |
United States |
Chemical Manufacturing |
357.4 |
475 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Amsterdam, Noord-Holland |
Netherlands |
Chemical Manufacturing |
|
473 |
|
|
Branch |
Orangeburg, SC |
United States |
Chemical Manufacturing |
399.3 |
450 |
|
|
Branch |
Emerson, AR |
United States |
Chemical Manufacturing |
357.4 |
400 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Houston, TX |
United States |
Chemical Manufacturing |
|
400 |
|
|
Branch |
Pasadena, TX |
United States |
Chemical Manufacturing |
340.1 |
300 |
|
|
Branch |
Tyrone, PA |
United States |
Chemical Manufacturing |
98.0 |
200 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Ottignies-Louvain-La-Neuve, Brabant Wallon |
Belgium |
Chemical Manufacturing |
75.0 |
150 |
|
|
Branch |
South Haven, MI |
United States |
Biotechnology and Drugs |
27.0 |
120 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Budapest |
Hungary |
Business Services |
6.5 |
78 |
|
|
Branch |
Tyrone, PA |
United States |
Chemical Manufacturing |
|
55 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Bristol |
United Kingdom |
Chemical Manufacturing |
20.8 |
52 |
|
|
Joint Venture |
Tokyo |
Japan |
Chemical Manufacturing |
|
40 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Twinsburg, OH |
United States |
Engineering Consultants |
|
16 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Singapore |
Singapore |
Biotechnology and Drugs |
193.6 |
15 |
|
|
Branch |
Ames, IA |
United States |
Biotechnology and Drugs |
|
15 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Middlesbrough |
United Kingdom |
Chemical Manufacturing |
3.9 |
5 |
|
|
Branch |
Rayne, LA |
United States |
Personal Services |
|
2 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Bergheim, Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany |
Biotechnology and Drugs |
|
1 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal |
South Africa |
Chemical Manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
Tokyo |
Japan |
Biotechnology and Drugs |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
Shanghai |
China |
Biotechnology and Drugs |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
Shanghai |
China |
Biotechnology and Drugs |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
Nanjing |
China |
Biotechnology and Drugs |
|
|
|
|
Albemarle Corp |
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
Louvain-La-Neuve |
Belgium |
Chemical Manufacturing |
937.7 |
93 |
|
Executives
Report
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Financials in:
USD (mil) |
|
|
Except for
share items (millions) and per share items (actual units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
31-Dec-2007 |
|
Period Length |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
|
UpdateType/Date |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
|
Filed Currency |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
|
Exchange Rate (Period Average) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Auditor |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
Auditor Opinion |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
2,869.0 |
2,362.8 |
2,005.4 |
2,467.1 |
2,336.2 |
|
Revenue |
2,869.0 |
2,362.8 |
2,005.4 |
2,467.1 |
2,336.2 |
|
Total Revenue |
2,869.0 |
2,362.8 |
2,005.4 |
2,467.1 |
2,336.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenue |
1,891.9 |
1,616.8 |
1,521.5 |
1,859.4 |
1,713.7 |
|
Cost of Revenue, Total |
1,891.9 |
1,616.8 |
1,521.5 |
1,859.4 |
1,713.7 |
|
Gross Profit |
977.1 |
745.9 |
483.9 |
607.7 |
622.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling/General/Administrative
Expense |
312.1 |
265.7 |
212.6 |
255.1 |
245.0 |
|
Total Selling/General/Administrative
Expenses |
312.1 |
265.7 |
212.6 |
255.1 |
245.0 |
|
Research & Development |
77.1 |
58.4 |
60.9 |
67.3 |
62.7 |
|
Restructuring
Charge |
0.0 |
7.0 |
11.6 |
25.8 |
0.0 |
|
Other Unusual
Expense (Income) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.4 |
38.5 |
4.9 |
|
Unusual Expense (Income) |
0.0 |
7.0 |
24.0 |
64.3 |
4.9 |
|
Total Operating Expense |
2,281.2 |
1,947.9 |
1,819.1 |
2,246.2 |
2,026.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
587.8 |
414.8 |
186.3 |
220.9 |
309.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Expense - Non-Operating |
-37.6 |
-25.5 |
-24.6 |
-38.2 |
-38.3 |
|
Interest Expense,
Net Non-Operating |
-37.6 |
-25.5 |
-24.6 |
-38.2 |
-38.3 |
|
Investment
Income - Non-Operating |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3.0 |
|
Interest/Investment
Income - Non-Operating |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3.0 |
|
Interest Income (Expense) - Net
Non-Operating Total |
-37.6 |
-25.5 |
-24.6 |
-38.2 |
-35.3 |
|
Other Non-Operating
Income (Expense) |
0.4 |
2.8 |
-1.4 |
0.6 |
3.3 |
|
Other, Net |
0.4 |
2.8 |
-1.4 |
0.6 |
3.3 |
|
Income Before Tax |
550.6 |
392.1 |
160.3 |
183.3 |
277.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Tax |
130.0 |
92.7 |
-7.0 |
-6.5 |
55.1 |
|
Income After Tax |
420.6 |
299.4 |
167.3 |
189.9 |
222.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest |
-28.1 |
-13.6 |
-11.3 |
-18.8 |
-17.6 |
|
Equity In
Affiliates |
43.8 |
38.0 |
22.3 |
23.1 |
24.6 |
|
Net Income Before Extraord Items |
436.3 |
323.7 |
178.4 |
194.2 |
229.7 |
|
Net Income |
436.3 |
323.7 |
178.4 |
194.2 |
229.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Available to Common Excl Extraord
Items |
436.3 |
323.7 |
178.4 |
194.2 |
229.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Available to Common Incl Extraord
Items |
436.3 |
323.7 |
178.4 |
194.2 |
229.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic/Primary Weighted Average Shares |
90.5 |
91.4 |
91.5 |
91.7 |
95.5 |
|
Basic EPS Excl Extraord Items |
4.82 |
3.54 |
1.95 |
2.12 |
2.41 |
|
Basic/Primary EPS Incl Extraord Items |
4.82 |
3.54 |
1.95 |
2.12 |
2.41 |
|
Dilution Adjustment |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Diluted Net Income |
436.3 |
323.7 |
178.4 |
194.2 |
229.7 |
|
Diluted Weighted Average Shares |
91.5 |
92.2 |
92.0 |
92.7 |
97.4 |
|
Diluted EPS Excl Extraord Items |
4.77 |
3.51 |
1.94 |
2.09 |
2.36 |
|
Diluted EPS Incl Extraord Items |
4.77 |
3.51 |
1.94 |
2.09 |
2.36 |
|
Dividends per Share - Common Stock Primary
Issue |
0.67 |
0.56 |
0.50 |
0.48 |
0.42 |
|
Gross Dividends - Common Stock |
60.5 |
51.2 |
45.8 |
43.8 |
40.1 |
|
Interest Expense, Supplemental |
37.6 |
25.5 |
24.6 |
38.2 |
38.3 |
|
Interest Capitalized, Supplemental |
-2.4 |
-1.1 |
-1.2 |
-1.0 |
-4.5 |
|
Depreciation, Supplemental |
83.6 |
82.5 |
87.3 |
97.4 |
93.0 |
|
Total Special Items |
0.0 |
7.0 |
24.0 |
64.3 |
4.9 |
|
Normalized Income Before Tax |
550.6 |
399.1 |
184.3 |
247.7 |
282.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Special Items on Income Taxes |
0.0 |
1.6 |
8.4 |
22.5 |
1.0 |
|
Inc Tax Ex Impact of Sp Items |
130.0 |
94.4 |
1.4 |
16.0 |
56.1 |
|
Normalized Income After Tax |
420.6 |
304.7 |
182.9 |
231.7 |
226.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normalized Inc. Avail to Com. |
436.3 |
329.0 |
194.0 |
236.0 |
233.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Normalized EPS |
4.82 |
3.60 |
2.12 |
2.58 |
2.45 |
|
Diluted Normalized EPS |
4.77 |
3.57 |
2.11 |
2.54 |
2.40 |
|
Amort of Intangibles, Supplemental |
13.1 |
13.1 |
13.2 |
14.3 |
13.9 |
|
Rental Expenses |
30.9 |
29.0 |
27.3 |
30.7 |
26.2 |
|
Research & Development Exp,
Supplemental |
77.1 |
58.4 |
60.9 |
67.3 |
62.7 |
|
Reported Gross Profit |
977.1 |
745.9 |
483.9 |
607.7 |
622.5 |
|
Reported Operating Profit |
587.8 |
414.8 |
186.3 |
220.9 |
309.9 |
|
Normalized EBIT |
587.8 |
421.8 |
210.3 |
285.3 |
314.8 |
|
Normalized EBITDA |
684.5 |
517.4 |
310.8 |
397.0 |
421.7 |
|
Current Tax -
Domestic |
82.4 |
14.6 |
-23.9 |
-17.2 |
39.5 |
|
Current Tax -
Foreign |
28.2 |
25.8 |
14.4 |
22.9 |
23.4 |
|
Current Tax - Local |
4.8 |
5.2 |
0.8 |
-0.3 |
1.3 |
|
Current Tax - Total |
115.3 |
45.6 |
-8.7 |
5.5 |
64.2 |
|
Deferred Tax -
Domestic |
1.6 |
57.2 |
29.6 |
-0.8 |
2.0 |
|
Deferred Tax -
Foreign |
12.2 |
-9.4 |
-29.2 |
-10.4 |
-11.7 |
|
Deferred Tax -
Local |
0.9 |
-0.7 |
1.3 |
-0.9 |
0.6 |
|
Deferred Tax - Total |
14.7 |
47.1 |
1.7 |
-12.0 |
-9.1 |
|
Income Tax - Total |
130.0 |
92.7 |
-7.0 |
-6.5 |
55.1 |
|
Interest Cost - Domestic |
30.9 |
29.9 |
30.6 |
29.5 |
27.2 |
|
Service Cost - Domestic |
11.2 |
9.6 |
8.5 |
9.9 |
9.4 |
|
Prior Service Cost - Domestic |
-1.0 |
-1.0 |
-1.0 |
-1.1 |
-1.1 |
|
Expected Return on Assets - Domestic |
-48.2 |
-41.6 |
-42.1 |
-41.8 |
-38.7 |
|
Actuarial Gains and Losses - Domestic |
24.9 |
16.2 |
11.4 |
8.6 |
12.5 |
|
Transition Costs - Domestic |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Domestic Pension Plan Expense |
17.8 |
13.1 |
7.5 |
5.2 |
9.3 |
|
Interest Cost - Foreign |
2.0 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
|
Service Cost - Foreign |
1.7 |
1.7 |
2.0 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
|
Prior Service Cost - Foreign |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Expected Return on Assets - Foreign |
-0.4 |
-0.3 |
-0.3 |
-0.3 |
-0.2 |
|
Actuarial Gains and Losses - Foreign |
1.2 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
-0.8 |
-0.7 |
|
Curtailments & Settlements - Foreign |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-1.4 |
0.0 |
|
Foreign Pension Plan Expense |
4.5 |
4.5 |
5.1 |
2.0 |
3.6 |
|
Interest Cost - Post-Retirement |
3.4 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
3.3 |
3.9 |
|
Service Cost - Post-Retirement |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
|
Prior Service Cost - Post-Retirement |
2.4 |
-1.7 |
-7.6 |
-9.6 |
-3.9 |
|
Expected Return on Assets - Post-Retir. |
-0.5 |
-0.5 |
-0.6 |
-0.6 |
-0.6 |
|
Actuarial Gains and Losses - Post-Retir. |
2.4 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
|
Curtailments & Settlements -
Post-Retir. |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-2.1 |
|
Post-Retirement Plan Expense |
8.0 |
3.4 |
-2.8 |
-6.1 |
-1.5 |
|
Defined Contribution Expense - Domestic |
4.5 |
3.9 |
3.5 |
3.4 |
3.0 |
|
Defined Contribution Expense - Foreign |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|
Total Pension Expense |
35.1 |
25.3 |
13.6 |
5.2 |
14.9 |
|
Discount Rate - Domestic |
5.45% |
5.77% |
6.45% |
6.39% |
5.78% |
|
Discount Rate - Post-Retirement |
5.30% |
5.70% |
6.55% |
6.40% |
5.81% |
|
Expected Rate of Return - Domestic |
8.25% |
8.19% |
8.69% |
8.71% |
8.71% |
|
Expected Rate of Return - Post-Retir. |
7.00% |
7.00% |
7.00% |
7.00% |
7.00% |
|
Compensation Rate - Domestic |
4.11% |
3.90% |
4.11% |
4.10% |
3.62% |
|
Compensation Rate - Post-Retirement |
4.00% |
4.00% |
4.25% |
4.25% |
3.75% |
|
Total Plan Interest Cost |
36.3 |
35.4 |
36.7 |
35.0 |
33.0 |
|
Total Plan Service Cost |
13.1 |
11.7 |
11.0 |
12.7 |
12.5 |
|
Total Plan Expected Return |
-49.2 |
-42.5 |
-42.9 |
-42.6 |
-39.5 |
|
|
|
Annual Balance Sheet |
|
Financials in: USD (mil) |
|
|
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
31-Dec-2007 |
|
UpdateType/Date |
Updated Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Restated Normal |
|
Filed Currency |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
|
Exchange Rate |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Auditor |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
Auditor Opinion |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash &
Equivalents |
469.4 |
529.7 |
308.8 |
253.3 |
130.6 |
|
Cash and Short Term Investments |
469.4 |
529.7 |
308.8 |
253.3 |
130.6 |
|
Accounts
Receivable - Trade, Gross |
358.1 |
343.4 |
296.4 |
282.5 |
371.5 |
|
Provision
for Doubtful Accounts |
-2.7 |
-2.5 |
-2.3 |
-1.9 |
-0.8 |
|
Trade Accounts
Receivable - Net |
355.4 |
340.9 |
294.2 |
280.6 |
370.7 |
|
Other Receivables |
44.5 |
44.0 |
42.7 |
66.9 |
65.3 |
|
Total Receivables, Net |
399.9 |
384.9 |
336.9 |
347.5 |
435.9 |
|
Inventories -
Finished Goods |
311.9 |
279.4 |
241.1 |
395.9 |
348.3 |
|
Inventories - Raw
Materials |
74.8 |
66.6 |
63.0 |
95.6 |
73.6 |
|
Inventories - Other |
44.8 |
43.2 |
43.4 |
47.3 |
51.0 |
|
Total Inventory |
431.5 |
389.2 |
347.5 |
538.9 |
472.8 |
|
Prepaid Expenses |
45.5 |
39.7 |
29.6 |
19.2 |
15.8 |
|
Deferred Income Tax
- Current Asset |
9.4 |
4.7 |
9.3 |
20.0 |
8.9 |
|
Other Current Assets, Total |
9.4 |
4.7 |
9.3 |
20.0 |
8.9 |
|
Total Current Assets |
1,355.6 |
1,348.2 |
1,032.1 |
1,178.9 |
1,064.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
186.4 |
204.9 |
196.5 |
183.6 |
186.7 |
|
Land/Improvements |
109.4 |
104.4 |
100.6 |
99.0 |
102.9 |
|
Machinery/Equipment |
1,614.8 |
1,545.1 |
1,537.8 |
1,491.4 |
1,523.1 |
|
Construction
in Progress |
142.1 |
58.2 |
42.4 |
71.3 |
48.9 |
|
Leases |
566.6 |
527.6 |
528.8 |
477.7 |
453.0 |
|
Property/Plant/Equipment
- Gross |
2,619.4 |
2,440.2 |
2,406.1 |
2,323.0 |
2,314.5 |
|
Accumulated
Depreciation |
-1,489.9 |
-1,433.9 |
-1,379.2 |
-1,310.6 |
-1,276.0 |
|
Property/Plant/Equipment - Net |
1,129.5 |
1,006.3 |
1,026.9 |
1,012.3 |
1,038.5 |
|
Goodwill, Net |
273.1 |
272.2 |
292.7 |
278.8 |
270.2 |
|
Intangibles - Gross |
237.5 |
229.6 |
224.9 |
228.1 |
199.2 |
|
Accumulated
Intangible Amortization |
-107.2 |
-94.9 |
-74.3 |
-61.1 |
-27.9 |
|
Intangibles, Net |
130.3 |
134.8 |
150.5 |
167.0 |
171.4 |
|
LT Investment -
Affiliate Companies |
180.4 |
160.8 |
126.5 |
106.2 |
110.4 |
|
LT Investments -
Other |
18.0 |
19.9 |
19.6 |
15.8 |
17.7 |
|
Long Term Investments |
198.4 |
180.7 |
146.1 |
122.0 |
128.2 |
|
Note Receivable - Long Term |
21.8 |
12.3 |
14.9 |
39.9 |
50.7 |
|
Pension Benefits -
Overfunded |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
67.3 |
|
Deferred Income Tax
- Long Term Asset |
51.0 |
64.6 |
73.7 |
50.8 |
26.9 |
|
Other Long Term
Assets |
44.1 |
49.0 |
34.7 |
23.0 |
23.9 |
|
Other Long Term Assets, Total |
95.1 |
113.6 |
108.3 |
73.8 |
118.1 |
|
Total Assets |
3,203.8 |
3,068.1 |
2,771.6 |
2,872.7 |
2,841.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable |
184.5 |
175.2 |
170.3 |
224.3 |
198.8 |
|
Accrued Expenses |
156.4 |
128.8 |
122.4 |
170.5 |
155.4 |
|
Notes Payable/Short Term Debt |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Current Portion - Long Term Debt/Capital
Leases |
14.4 |
9.0 |
36.3 |
26.2 |
16.6 |
|
Dividends Payable |
15.2 |
12.5 |
11.0 |
9.7 |
8.2 |
|
Customer Advances |
18.8 |
14.9 |
10.8 |
- |
- |
|
Income Taxes
Payable |
11.8 |
23.8 |
2.4 |
7.6 |
34.5 |
|
Other Current liabilities, Total |
45.9 |
51.2 |
24.2 |
17.3 |
42.7 |
|
Total Current Liabilities |
401.2 |
364.2 |
353.3 |
438.4 |
413.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Debt |
747.3 |
846.1 |
776.4 |
906.1 |
707.3 |
|
Capital Lease
Obligations |
2.0 |
5.9 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total Long Term Debt |
749.3 |
851.9 |
776.4 |
906.1 |
707.3 |
|
Total Debt |
763.7 |
860.9 |
812.7 |
932.3 |
723.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Tax
- LT Liability |
77.9 |
109.6 |
81.4 |
74.8 |
107.1 |
|
Deferred Income Tax |
77.9 |
109.6 |
81.4 |
74.8 |
107.1 |
|
Minority Interest |
87.6 |
59.7 |
47.6 |
50.7 |
54.4 |
|
Pension Benefits -
Underfunded |
200.4 |
172.1 |
216.5 |
194.2 |
100.3 |
|
Other Long Term
Liabilities |
96.2 |
94.6 |
90.7 |
142.8 |
180.2 |
|
Other Liabilities, Total |
296.7 |
266.7 |
307.1 |
337.0 |
280.5 |
|
Total Liabilities |
1,612.5 |
1,652.0 |
1,565.9 |
1,806.9 |
1,562.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
|
Common Stock |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
|
Additional Paid-In Capital |
15.2 |
18.8 |
8.7 |
0.0 |
154.5 |
|
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) |
1,798.1 |
1,560.5 |
1,288.0 |
1,165.5 |
1,023.0 |
|
Other Comprehensive
Income |
-222.9 |
-164.2 |
-91.9 |
-100.6 |
99.9 |
|
Other Equity, Total |
-222.9 |
-164.2 |
-91.9 |
-100.6 |
99.9 |
|
Total Equity |
1,591.3 |
1,416.1 |
1,205.7 |
1,065.8 |
1,278.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Shareholders’
Equity |
3,203.8 |
3,068.1 |
2,771.6 |
2,872.7 |
2,841.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding
- Common Stock Primary Issue |
88.8 |
91.6 |
91.5 |
91.0 |
94.7 |
|
Total Common Shares Outstanding |
88.8 |
91.6 |
91.5 |
91.0 |
94.7 |
|
Treasury Shares - Common Stock Primary Issue |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
|
Employees |
4,260 |
4,020 |
3,950 |
4,130 |
4,130 |
|
Number of Common Shareholders |
3,404 |
3,555 |
3,798 |
3,469 |
4,065 |
|
Accumulated Intangible Amort, Suppl. |
107.2 |
94.9 |
74.3 |
61.1 |
27.9 |
|
Deferred Revenue - Current |
18.8 |
14.9 |
10.8 |
- |
- |
|
Deferred Revenue - Long Term |
14.9 |
14.2 |
14.1 |
- |
- |
|
Total Long Term Debt, Supplemental |
764.6 |
858.3 |
803.0 |
932.3 |
723.9 |
|
Long Term Debt Maturing within 1 Year |
12.4 |
5.1 |
32.6 |
26.2 |
16.6 |
|
Long Term Debt Maturing in Year 2 |
12.7 |
10.7 |
5.1 |
11.1 |
9.5 |
|
Long Term Debt Maturing in Year 3 |
6.0 |
153.4 |
5.4 |
9.0 |
8.6 |
|
Long Term Debt Maturing in Year 4 |
327.1 |
6.0 |
420.9 |
7.4 |
9.1 |
|
Long Term Debt Maturing in Year 5 |
50.4 |
327.1 |
6.0 |
539.6 |
335.4 |
|
Long Term Debt Maturing in 2-3 Years |
18.7 |
164.0 |
10.5 |
20.1 |
18.1 |
|
Long Term Debt Maturing in 4-5 Years |
377.4 |
333.1 |
426.9 |
547.0 |
344.5 |
|
Long Term Debt Matur. in Year 6 &
Beyond |
356.0 |
356.1 |
333.0 |
339.0 |
344.7 |
|
Interest Costs |
-0.1 |
-0.6 |
-1.3 |
-2.1 |
-3.3 |
|
Total Capital Leases, Supplemental |
2.0 |
5.9 |
9.7 |
13.0 |
16.7 |
|
Capital Lease Payments Due in Year 1 |
2.2 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
|
Capital Lease Payments Due in Year 2 |
0.0 |
2.2 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
|
Capital Lease Payments Due in Year 3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.2 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
|
Capital Lease Payments Due in Year 4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.2 |
4.4 |
|
Capital Lease Payments Due in Year 5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.2 |
|
Capital Lease Payments Due in 2-3 Years |
0.0 |
2.2 |
6.6 |
8.6 |
8.9 |
|
Capital Lease Payments Due in 4-5 Years |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.2 |
6.7 |
|
Cap. Lease Pymts. Due in Year 6 &
Beyond |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total Operating Leases, Supplemental |
31.8 |
36.1 |
41.1 |
48.6 |
50.1 |
|
Operating Lease Payments Due in Year 1 |
8.3 |
8.7 |
9.4 |
9.3 |
10.1 |
|
Operating Lease Payments Due in Year 2 |
5.1 |
6.1 |
6.4 |
7.3 |
6.8 |
|
Operating Lease Payments Due in Year 3 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
5.1 |
5.5 |
|
Operating Lease Payments Due in Year 4 |
2.7 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
|
Operating Lease Payments Due in Year 5 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
3.0 |
|
Operating Lease Pymts. Due in 2-3 Years |
8.6 |
10.1 |
10.8 |
12.5 |
12.3 |
|
Operating Lease Pymts. Due in 4-5 Years |
4.8 |
5.2 |
5.5 |
6.3 |
6.9 |
|
Oper. Lse. Pymts. Due in Year 6 &
Beyond |
10.1 |
12.2 |
15.5 |
20.5 |
20.8 |
|
Pension Obligation - Domestic |
634.2 |
573.0 |
526.5 |
479.1 |
466.9 |
|
Pension Obligation - Foreign |
40.5 |
40.9 |
44.4 |
39.0 |
- |
|
Post-Retirement Obligation |
68.9 |
66.4 |
65.7 |
59.3 |
54.4 |
|
Plan Assets - Domestic |
522.4 |
499.0 |
410.0 |
360.6 |
506.6 |
|
Plan Assets - Foreign |
8.7 |
8.1 |
7.1 |
5.5 |
- |
|
Plan Assets - Post-Retirement |
7.7 |
8.0 |
8.2 |
8.8 |
8.7 |
|
Funded Status - Domestic |
-111.8 |
-74.0 |
-116.4 |
-118.5 |
39.8 |
|
Funded Status - Foreign |
-31.8 |
-32.8 |
-37.3 |
-33.5 |
- |
|
Funded Status - Post-Retirement |
-61.3 |
-58.5 |
-57.5 |
-50.5 |
-45.7 |
|
Accumulated Obligation - Domestic |
657.0 |
598.6 |
554.1 |
495.5 |
- |
|
Accumulated Obligation - Post-Retirement |
68.9 |
66.4 |
65.7 |
59.3 |
54.4 |
|
Total Funded Status |
-204.8 |
-165.3 |
-211.3 |
-202.6 |
-5.9 |
|
Discount Rate - Domestic |
5.07% |
5.45% |
5.86% |
6.45% |
6.39% |
|
Discount Rate - Post-Retirement |
5.10% |
5.30% |
5.70% |
6.55% |
6.40% |
|
Compensation Rate - Domestic |
4.11% |
4.11% |
4.11% |
4.03% |
4.08% |
|
Compensation Rate - Post-Retirement |
4.00% |
4.00% |
4.00% |
4.25% |
4.25% |
|
Prepaid Benefits - Domestic |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
67.3 |
|
Accrued Liabilities - Domestic |
-111.8 |
-74.0 |
-116.4 |
-118.5 |
-27.5 |
|
Accrued Liabilities - Foreign |
-31.8 |
-32.8 |
-37.3 |
-33.5 |
-4.6 |
|
Accrued Liabilities - Post-Retirement |
-61.3 |
-58.5 |
-57.5 |
-50.5 |
-45.7 |
|
Other Assets, Net - Domestic |
413.7 |
343.1 |
328.0 |
302.4 |
118.1 |
|
Other Assets, Net - Post-Retirement |
19.2 |
17.6 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
-10.4 |
|
Net Assets Recognized on Balance Sheet |
228.1 |
195.4 |
120.4 |
103.5 |
97.2 |
|
Debt Securities % - Domestic |
24.40% |
- |
15.00% |
11.00% |
10.00% |
|
Debt Securities % - Post-Retirement |
100.00% |
- |
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
|
Total Plan Obligations |
743.6 |
680.3 |
636.6 |
577.5 |
521.3 |
|
Total Plan Assets |
538.8 |
515.0 |
425.3 |
374.9 |
515.3 |
|
|
|
Annual Cash Flows |
|
Financials in: USD (mil) |
|
|
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
31-Dec-2007 |
|
Period Length |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
|
UpdateType/Date |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
|
Filed Currency |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
|
Exchange Rate (Period Average) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Auditor |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
Auditor Opinion |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income/Starting Line |
464.4 |
337.4 |
189.6 |
213.0 |
247.3 |
|
Depreciation |
96.8 |
95.6 |
100.5 |
111.7 |
106.9 |
|
Depreciation/Depletion |
96.8 |
95.6 |
100.5 |
111.7 |
106.9 |
|
Deferred Taxes |
14.7 |
47.1 |
1.7 |
-12.0 |
-9.1 |
|
Unusual Items |
0.0 |
7.0 |
24.0 |
64.3 |
4.9 |
|
Equity in Net
Earnings (Loss) |
-43.8 |
-38.0 |
-22.3 |
-23.1 |
-24.6 |
|
Other Non-Cash
Items |
6.9 |
-36.5 |
-17.3 |
-1.3 |
10.8 |
|
Non-Cash Items |
-36.9 |
-67.5 |
-15.6 |
39.9 |
-8.8 |
|
Accounts Receivable |
-16.4 |
-57.4 |
1.3 |
90.5 |
11.2 |
|
Inventories |
-41.7 |
-58.6 |
180.1 |
-87.9 |
-70.6 |
|
Other Assets |
4.5 |
-14.5 |
-5.0 |
-14.2 |
-13.9 |
|
Accounts Payable |
-12.0 |
13.5 |
-53.5 |
33.5 |
-12.6 |
|
Accrued Expenses |
28.2 |
35.8 |
-18.7 |
-30.2 |
6.9 |
|
Other Liabilities |
-1.2 |
2.4 |
-4.6 |
-4.8 |
-7.2 |
|
Other Assets &
Liabilities, Net |
-0.7 |
2.2 |
-34.0 |
-15.8 |
9.0 |
|
Other Operating
Cash Flow |
-12.2 |
-4.5 |
16.7 |
3.6 |
-12.7 |
|
Changes in Working Capital |
-51.6 |
-81.2 |
82.3 |
-25.4 |
-89.9 |
|
Cash from Operating Activities |
487.4 |
331.3 |
358.5 |
327.2 |
246.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Fixed
Assets |
-190.6 |
-75.5 |
-100.8 |
-99.7 |
-98.7 |
|
Capital Expenditures |
-190.6 |
-75.5 |
-100.8 |
-99.7 |
-98.7 |
|
Acquisition of
Business |
-13.2 |
-12.0 |
-4.0 |
-64.0 |
-17.9 |
|
Sale of Fixed
Assets |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
6.0 |
0.0 |
|
Sale/Maturity of
Investment |
0.0 |
8.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
|
Investment, Net |
1.7 |
0.7 |
-0.3 |
-3.3 |
-4.9 |
|
Purchase of
Investments |
-10.9 |
-1.3 |
0.0 |
-0.2 |
-0.1 |
|
Other Investing
Cash Flow |
0.0 |
-12.6 |
-16.4 |
-2.6 |
-11.7 |
|
Other Investing Cash Flow Items, Total |
-22.4 |
-16.7 |
-20.8 |
-64.0 |
-34.2 |
|
Cash from Investing Activities |
-212.9 |
-92.2 |
-121.6 |
-163.7 |
-132.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financing
Cash Flow |
4.7 |
1.0 |
-14.7 |
-24.8 |
1.4 |
|
Financing Cash Flow Items |
4.7 |
1.0 |
-14.7 |
-24.8 |
1.4 |
|
Cash Dividends Paid
- Common |
-57.8 |
-49.6 |
-44.4 |
-42.3 |
-40.0 |
|
Total Cash Dividends Paid |
-57.8 |
-49.6 |
-44.4 |
-42.3 |
-40.0 |
|
Repurchase/Retirement
of Common |
-178.1 |
-14.9 |
-5.8 |
-169.0 |
-101.2 |
|
Common Stock, Net |
-178.1 |
-14.9 |
-5.8 |
-169.0 |
-101.2 |
|
Options Exercised |
2.2 |
7.1 |
4.2 |
3.9 |
21.9 |
|
Issuance (Retirement) of Stock, Net |
-175.9 |
-7.8 |
-1.7 |
-165.0 |
-79.3 |
|
Long
Term Debt Issued |
9.4 |
472.7 |
14.3 |
255.2 |
107.9 |
|
Long
Term Debt Reduction |
-109.6 |
-424.1 |
-134.3 |
-48.2 |
-133.5 |
|
Long Term Debt, Net |
-100.2 |
48.5 |
-120.0 |
207.1 |
-25.6 |
|
Issuance (Retirement) of Debt, Net |
-100.2 |
48.5 |
-120.0 |
207.1 |
-25.6 |
|
Cash from Financing Activities |
-329.1 |
-7.9 |
-180.8 |
-25.0 |
-143.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Effects |
-5.5 |
-10.3 |
-0.6 |
-15.7 |
11.1 |
|
Net Change in Cash |
-60.2 |
220.9 |
55.5 |
122.8 |
-18.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash - Beginning Balance |
529.7 |
308.8 |
253.3 |
130.6 |
149.5 |
|
Net Cash - Ending Balance |
469.4 |
529.7 |
308.8 |
253.3 |
130.6 |
|
Cash Interest Paid |
33.1 |
21.9 |
22.1 |
36.1 |
32.8 |
|
Cash Taxes Paid |
123.3 |
34.8 |
14.8 |
44.6 |
40.3 |
Annual Income Statement
|
Financials in:
USD (mil) |
|
|
Except for
share items (millions) and per share items (actual units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
31-Dec-2007 |
|
Period Length |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
|
UpdateType/Date |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
|
Filed Currency |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
|
Exchange Rate (Period Average) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Auditor |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
Auditor Opinion |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
2,869.0 |
2,362.8 |
2,005.4 |
2,467.1 |
2,336.2 |
|
Total Revenue |
2,869.0 |
2,362.8 |
2,005.4 |
2,467.1 |
2,336.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Sales |
1,891.9 |
1,616.8 |
1,521.5 |
1,859.4 |
1,713.7 |
|
Sell./Gen./Admin. |
312.1 |
265.7 |
212.6 |
255.1 |
245.0 |
|
Research/Development |
77.1 |
58.4 |
60.9 |
67.3 |
62.7 |
|
Port de Bouc
Disposition Charge |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.4 |
38.5 |
0.0 |
|
Restructuring
Charges |
0.0 |
7.0 |
11.6 |
25.8 |
0.0 |
|
Dayton facility
closure charge |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4.9 |
|
Loss on Thann
facility divestiture |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total Operating Expense |
2,281.2 |
1,947.9 |
1,819.1 |
2,246.2 |
2,026.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest/Finance |
-37.6 |
-25.5 |
-24.6 |
-38.2 |
-38.3 |
|
Foreign currency
gain |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3.0 |
|
Other Income |
0.4 |
2.8 |
-1.4 |
0.6 |
3.3 |
|
Net Income Before Taxes |
550.6 |
392.1 |
160.3 |
183.3 |
277.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
130.0 |
92.7 |
-7.0 |
-6.5 |
55.1 |
|
Net Income After Taxes |
420.6 |
299.4 |
167.3 |
189.9 |
222.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest |
-28.1 |
-13.6 |
-11.3 |
-18.8 |
-17.6 |
|
Equity in net
income of unconsolidated i |
43.8 |
38.0 |
22.3 |
23.1 |
24.6 |
|
Net Income Before Extra. Items |
436.3 |
323.7 |
178.4 |
194.2 |
229.7 |
|
Net Income |
436.3 |
323.7 |
178.4 |
194.2 |
229.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Available to Com Excl ExtraOrd |
436.3 |
323.7 |
178.4 |
194.2 |
229.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Available to Com Incl ExtraOrd |
436.3 |
323.7 |
178.4 |
194.2 |
229.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Weighted Average Shares |
90.5 |
91.4 |
91.5 |
91.7 |
95.5 |
|
Basic EPS Excluding ExtraOrdinary Items |
4.82 |
3.54 |
1.95 |
2.12 |
2.41 |
|
Basic EPS Including ExtraOrdinary Item |
4.82 |
3.54 |
1.95 |
2.12 |
2.41 |
|
Dilution Adjustment |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Diluted Net Income |
436.3 |
323.7 |
178.4 |
194.2 |
229.7 |
|
Diluted Weighted Average Shares |
91.5 |
92.2 |
92.0 |
92.7 |
97.4 |
|
Diluted EPS Excluding ExtraOrd Items |
4.77 |
3.51 |
1.94 |
2.09 |
2.36 |
|
Diluted EPS Including ExtraOrd Items |
4.77 |
3.51 |
1.94 |
2.09 |
2.36 |
|
DPS-Common Stock |
0.67 |
0.56 |
0.50 |
0.48 |
0.42 |
|
Gross Dividends - Common Stock |
60.5 |
51.2 |
45.8 |
43.8 |
40.1 |
|
Normalized Income Before Taxes |
550.6 |
399.1 |
184.3 |
247.7 |
282.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc Tax Ex Impact of Sp Items |
130.0 |
94.4 |
1.4 |
16.0 |
56.1 |
|
Normalized Income After Taxes |
420.6 |
304.7 |
182.9 |
231.7 |
226.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normalized Inc. Avail to Com. |
436.3 |
329.0 |
194.0 |
236.0 |
233.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Normalized EPS |
4.82 |
3.60 |
2.12 |
2.58 |
2.45 |
|
Diluted Normalized EPS |
4.77 |
3.57 |
2.11 |
2.54 |
2.40 |
|
Research & Development Exp |
77.1 |
58.4 |
60.9 |
67.3 |
62.7 |
|
Interest Expense |
37.6 |
25.5 |
24.6 |
38.2 |
38.3 |
|
Interest Capitalized |
-2.4 |
-1.1 |
-1.2 |
-1.0 |
-4.5 |
|
Rental Expense |
30.9 |
29.0 |
27.3 |
30.7 |
26.2 |
|
Depreciation |
83.6 |
82.5 |
87.3 |
97.4 |
93.0 |
|
Amortization |
13.1 |
13.1 |
13.2 |
14.3 |
13.9 |
|
Current Tax -
Federal |
82.4 |
14.6 |
-23.9 |
-17.2 |
39.5 |
|
Current Tax - State |
4.8 |
5.2 |
0.8 |
-0.3 |
1.3 |
|
Current Tax -
Foreign |
28.2 |
25.8 |
14.4 |
22.9 |
23.4 |
|
Current Tax - Total |
115.3 |
45.6 |
-8.7 |
5.5 |
64.2 |
|
Deferred Tax -
Federal |
1.6 |
57.2 |
29.6 |
-0.8 |
2.0 |
|
Deferred Tax -
State |
0.9 |
-0.7 |
1.3 |
-0.9 |
0.6 |
|
Deferred Tax -
Foreign |
12.2 |
-9.4 |
-29.2 |
-10.4 |
-11.7 |
|
Deferred Tax - Total |
14.7 |
47.1 |
1.7 |
-12.0 |
-9.1 |
|
Income Tax - Total |
130.0 |
92.7 |
-7.0 |
-6.5 |
55.1 |
|
Gross profit |
977.1 |
745.9 |
483.9 |
607.7 |
622.5 |
|
Operating profit |
587.8 |
414.8 |
186.3 |
220.9 |
309.9 |
|
Service Cost - Domestic |
11.2 |
9.6 |
8.5 |
9.9 |
9.4 |
|
Interest Cost - Domestic |
30.9 |
29.9 |
30.6 |
29.5 |
27.2 |
|
Expected Return on Assets - Domestic |
-48.2 |
-41.6 |
-42.1 |
-41.8 |
-38.7 |
|
Amort. of Prior Service Cost - Domestic |
-1.0 |
-1.0 |
-1.0 |
-1.1 |
-1.1 |
|
Amort. of Actuarial Gain/Loss - Domestic |
24.9 |
16.2 |
11.4 |
8.6 |
12.5 |
|
Amort. of Transition Oblig. - Domestic |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Domestic Pension Plan Expense |
17.8 |
13.1 |
7.5 |
5.2 |
9.3 |
|
Service Cost - Foreign |
1.7 |
1.7 |
2.0 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
|
Interest Cost - Foreign |
2.0 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
|
Expected Return on Assets - Foreign |
-0.4 |
-0.3 |
-0.3 |
-0.3 |
-0.2 |
|
Curtailments & Settlements - Foreign |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-1.4 |
0.0 |
|
Amort. of Prior Service Cost - Foreign |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Amort. of Actuarial Gain/Loss - Foreign |
1.2 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
-0.8 |
-0.7 |
|
Foreign Pension Plan Expense |
4.5 |
4.5 |
5.1 |
2.0 |
3.6 |
|
Service Cost - Post-Retirement |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
|
Interest Cost - Post-Retirement |
3.4 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
3.3 |
3.9 |
|
Expected Return on Assets - Post-Ret. |
-0.5 |
-0.5 |
-0.6 |
-0.6 |
-0.6 |
|
Curtailments & Settlements - Post-Ret. |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-2.1 |
|
Amort. of Prior Service Cost - Post-Ret. |
2.4 |
-1.7 |
-7.6 |
-9.6 |
-3.9 |
|
Amortization of Loss - Post-Retirement |
2.4 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
|
Post-Retirement Plan Expense |
8.0 |
3.4 |
-2.8 |
-6.1 |
-1.5 |
|
Defined Contribution Plan - U.S. |
4.5 |
3.9 |
3.5 |
3.4 |
3.0 |
|
Defined Contribution Plan - U.K. |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|
Total Pension Expense |
35.1 |
25.3 |
13.6 |
5.2 |
14.9 |
|
Discount Rate - Pension |
5.45% |
5.77% |
6.45% |
6.39% |
5.78% |
|
Expected Rate of Return - Pension |
8.25% |
8.19% |
8.69% |
8.71% |
8.71% |
|
Compensation Rate - Pension |
4.11% |
3.90% |
4.11% |
4.10% |
3.62% |
|
Discount Rate - Post-Retirement |
5.30% |
5.70% |
6.55% |
6.40% |
5.81% |
|
Expected Rate of Return - Post-Ret. |
7.00% |
7.00% |
7.00% |
7.00% |
7.00% |
|
Compensation Rate - Post-Retirement |
4.00% |
4.00% |
4.25% |
4.25% |
3.75% |
|
|
|
Annual Balance Sheet |
|
Financials in: USD (mil) |
|
|
|
|
|
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
31-Dec-2007 |
|
UpdateType/Date |
Updated Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Restated Normal |
|
Filed Currency |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
|
Exchange Rate |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Auditor |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
Auditor Opinion |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash/Equivalents |
469.4 |
529.7 |
308.8 |
253.3 |
130.6 |
|
Gross Rcvbls. |
358.1 |
343.4 |
296.4 |
282.5 |
371.5 |
|
Doubtful Account |
-2.7 |
-2.5 |
-2.3 |
-1.9 |
-0.8 |
|
Other accounts
receivable |
36.2 |
33.8 |
35.0 |
47.2 |
54.7 |
|
Finished goods |
311.9 |
279.4 |
241.1 |
395.9 |
348.3 |
|
Raw Materials |
74.8 |
66.6 |
63.0 |
95.6 |
73.6 |
|
Stores, supplies
and other |
44.8 |
43.2 |
43.4 |
47.3 |
51.0 |
|
Deferred Taxes |
9.4 |
4.7 |
9.3 |
20.0 |
8.9 |
|
Income tax
receivables |
8.3 |
10.3 |
7.7 |
19.8 |
10.6 |
|
Prepaid Expenses |
45.5 |
39.7 |
29.6 |
19.2 |
15.8 |
|
Total Current Assets |
1,355.6 |
1,348.2 |
1,032.1 |
1,178.9 |
1,064.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
59.1 |
55.6 |
50.5 |
49.5 |
51.5 |
|
Land/Improvement |
50.3 |
48.8 |
50.1 |
49.5 |
51.4 |
|
Buildings |
186.4 |
204.9 |
196.5 |
183.6 |
186.7 |
|
Machinery/Equip. |
1,552.6 |
1,484.5 |
1,478.7 |
1,432.4 |
1,464.5 |
|
Machinery &
Equipment under Cap. Lease |
542.0 |
502.9 |
504.1 |
453.0 |
428.3 |
|
Capital Lease
Equipments |
24.7 |
24.7 |
24.7 |
24.7 |
24.7 |
|
LT Mineral rights
and prod. equip. costs |
62.2 |
60.6 |
59.1 |
59.1 |
58.6 |
|
Const./Progress |
142.1 |
58.2 |
42.4 |
71.3 |
48.9 |
|
Depreciation |
-1,489.9 |
-1,433.9 |
-1,379.2 |
-1,310.6 |
-1,276.0 |
|
Joint Ventures |
180.4 |
160.8 |
126.5 |
106.2 |
110.4 |
|
Investments |
18.0 |
19.9 |
19.6 |
15.8 |
17.7 |
|
Deferred Tax |
51.0 |
64.6 |
73.7 |
50.8 |
26.9 |
|
Income Tax
Receivable |
21.8 |
12.3 |
14.9 |
39.9 |
50.7 |
|
Other assets |
44.1 |
49.0 |
34.7 |
23.0 |
23.9 |
|
Goodwill |
273.1 |
272.2 |
292.7 |
278.8 |
270.2 |
|
Customer lists |
100.1 |
100.5 |
95.7 |
94.2 |
86.4 |
|
Trademarks |
45.4 |
44.8 |
44.8 |
44.8 |
42.4 |
|
Patents |
46.0 |
44.6 |
42.0 |
42.0 |
40.7 |
|
Land use rights |
8.1 |
7.3 |
4.3 |
6.6 |
5.9 |
|
Manufacturing
contracts |
13.8 |
12.1 |
12.5 |
14.0 |
12.5 |
|
Other |
24.2 |
20.3 |
3.4 |
8.4 |
3.4 |
|
Mil spec approvals |
- |
- |
6.6 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
|
Noncompete
agreements |
- |
- |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
|
Licenses |
- |
- |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Accmulated Foreign
Exchange |
- |
- |
11.8 |
9.9 |
- |
|
Accumulated Amortization |
-107.2 |
-94.9 |
-74.3 |
-61.1 |
-27.9 |
|
Pension Benefits |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
67.3 |
|
Total Assets |
3,203.8 |
3,068.1 |
2,771.6 |
2,872.7 |
2,841.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable |
184.5 |
175.2 |
170.3 |
224.3 |
198.8 |
|
Cur. Port. LTD |
14.4 |
9.0 |
36.3 |
26.2 |
16.6 |
|
Employee benefits,
payroll and related t |
67.7 |
49.0 |
39.5 |
- |
- |
|
Deferred revenue |
18.8 |
14.9 |
10.8 |
- |
- |
|
Accrued Expenses |
88.7 |
79.8 |
82.9 |
170.5 |
155.4 |
|
Dividends payable |
15.2 |
12.5 |
11.0 |
9.7 |
8.2 |
|
Income taxes
payable |
11.8 |
23.8 |
2.4 |
7.6 |
34.5 |
|
Total Current Liabilities |
401.2 |
364.2 |
353.3 |
438.4 |
413.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
747.3 |
846.1 |
776.4 |
906.1 |
707.3 |
|
Capital lease
obligation |
2.0 |
5.9 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total Long Term Debt |
749.3 |
851.9 |
776.4 |
906.1 |
707.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement
benefits |
57.6 |
55.0 |
53.9 |
47.8 |
43.2 |
|
Pension Benefits |
128.0 |
102.8 |
148.5 |
146.4 |
57.1 |
|
Income tax payable |
30.7 |
21.9 |
22.3 |
81.3 |
107.2 |
|
Executive deferred
compensation plan obl |
16.8 |
17.8 |
16.9 |
- |
- |
|
Deferred revenue |
11.4 |
13.9 |
16.4 |
- |
- |
|
Asset retirement
obligation |
14.9 |
14.2 |
14.1 |
- |
- |
|
Other noncurrent
liabilities |
37.4 |
41.0 |
35.1 |
61.5 |
73.0 |
|
Minority Interest |
87.6 |
59.7 |
47.6 |
50.7 |
54.4 |
|
Deferred income
taxes |
77.9 |
109.6 |
81.4 |
74.8 |
107.1 |
|
Total Liabilities |
1,612.5 |
1,652.0 |
1,565.9 |
1,806.9 |
1,562.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
|
Additional paid in
capital |
15.2 |
18.8 |
8.7 |
0.0 |
154.5 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) i |
-222.9 |
-164.2 |
-91.9 |
-100.6 |
99.9 |
|
Retained earnings |
1,798.1 |
1,560.5 |
1,288.0 |
1,165.5 |
1,023.0 |
|
Total Equity |
1,591.3 |
1,416.1 |
1,205.7 |
1,065.8 |
1,278.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Shareholders'
Equity |
3,203.8 |
3,068.1 |
2,771.6 |
2,872.7 |
2,841.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S/O-Common Stock |
88.8 |
91.6 |
91.5 |
91.0 |
94.7 |
|
Total Common Shares Outstanding |
88.8 |
91.6 |
91.5 |
91.0 |
94.7 |
|
T/S-Common Stock |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
|
Deferred Revenue - Current |
18.8 |
14.9 |
10.8 |
- |
- |
|
Deferred Revenue - Long Term |
14.9 |
14.2 |
14.1 |
- |
- |
|
Accumulated Intangible Amortisation |
107.2 |
94.9 |
74.3 |
61.1 |
27.9 |
|
Full-Time Employees |
4,260 |
4,020 |
3,950 |
4,130 |
4,130 |
|
Number of Common Shareholders |
3,404 |
3,555 |
3,798 |
3,469 |
4,065 |
|
LT Debt Maturing within 1 Year |
12.4 |
5.1 |
32.6 |
26.2 |
16.6 |
|
LT Debt Maturing within 2 Years |
12.7 |
10.7 |
5.1 |
11.1 |
9.5 |
|
LT Debt Maturing within 3 Years |
6.0 |
153.4 |
5.4 |
9.0 |
8.6 |
|
LT Debt Maturing wihtin 4 Years |
327.1 |
6.0 |
420.9 |
7.4 |
9.1 |
|
LT Debt Maturing within 5 Years |
50.4 |
327.1 |
6.0 |
539.6 |
335.4 |
|
LT Debt Maturing after 5 Years |
356.0 |
356.1 |
333.0 |
339.0 |
344.7 |
|
Total Long Term Debt, Supplemental |
764.6 |
858.3 |
803.0 |
932.3 |
723.9 |
|
Capital Leases Maturing within 1 Year |
2.2 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
|
Capital Leases Maturing within 2 Years |
0.0 |
2.2 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
|
Capital Leases Maturing within 3 Years |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.2 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
|
Capital Leases Maturing within 4 Years |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.2 |
4.4 |
|
Capital Leases Maturing within 5 Years |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.2 |
|
Capital Leases Remaining Maturities |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Interest |
-0.1 |
-0.6 |
-1.3 |
-2.1 |
-3.3 |
|
Total Capital Leases |
2.0 |
5.9 |
9.7 |
13.0 |
16.7 |
|
Operating Lease Maturing within 1 Year |
8.3 |
8.7 |
9.4 |
9.3 |
10.1 |
|
Operating Lease Maturing within 2 Years |
5.1 |
6.1 |
6.4 |
7.3 |
6.8 |
|
Operating Lease Maturing within 3 Years |
3.5 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
5.1 |
5.5 |
|
Operating Lease Maturing within 4 Years |
2.7 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
|
Operating Lease Maturing within 5 Years |
2.1 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
3.0 |
|
Operating Lease Maturing after 5 Years |
10.1 |
12.2 |
15.5 |
20.5 |
20.8 |
|
Total Operating Leases |
31.8 |
36.1 |
41.1 |
48.6 |
50.1 |
|
Projected Benefit Obligation - Domestic |
634.2 |
573.0 |
526.5 |
479.1 |
466.9 |
|
FV of Plan Assets - Domestic |
522.4 |
499.0 |
410.0 |
360.6 |
506.6 |
|
Funded Status - Domestic |
-111.8 |
-74.0 |
-116.4 |
-118.5 |
39.8 |
|
Projected Benefit Obligation - Foreign |
40.5 |
40.9 |
44.4 |
39.0 |
- |
|
FV of Plan Assets - Foreign |
8.7 |
8.1 |
7.1 |
5.5 |
- |
|
Funded Status - Foreign |
-31.8 |
-32.8 |
-37.3 |
-33.5 |
- |
|
Accumulated Benefit Obligation - Pension |
657.0 |
598.6 |
554.1 |
495.5 |
- |
|
Projected Benefit Obligation - Post-Ret. |
68.9 |
66.4 |
65.7 |
59.3 |
54.4 |
|
FV of Plan Assets - Post-Retirement |
7.7 |
8.0 |
8.2 |
8.8 |
8.7 |
|
Funded Status - Post-Retirement |
-61.3 |
-58.5 |
-57.5 |
-50.5 |
-45.7 |
|
Accumulated Benefit Obligation - Post-Re |
68.9 |
66.4 |
65.7 |
59.3 |
54.4 |
|
Total Funded Status |
-204.8 |
-165.3 |
-211.3 |
-202.6 |
-5.9 |
|
Discount Rate - Pension |
5.07% |
5.45% |
5.86% |
6.45% |
6.39% |
|
Compensation Rate - Pension |
4.11% |
4.11% |
4.11% |
4.03% |
4.08% |
|
Discount Rate - Post-Retirement |
5.10% |
5.30% |
5.70% |
6.55% |
6.40% |
|
Compensation Rate - Post-Retirement |
4.00% |
4.00% |
4.00% |
4.25% |
4.25% |
|
Non-current Assets - Domestic |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
67.3 |
|
Current Liabilities - Domestic |
-13.9 |
-1.3 |
-1.6 |
-1.4 |
-3.7 |
|
Non-current Liabilities - Domestic |
-97.8 |
-72.7 |
-114.9 |
-117.2 |
-23.8 |
|
Current Liabilities - Foreign |
-1.7 |
-2.6 |
-3.7 |
-4.3 |
-4.6 |
|
Non-current Liabilities - Foreign |
-30.1 |
-30.2 |
-33.6 |
-29.2 |
- |
|
Current Liabilities - Post-Retirement |
-3.7 |
-3.4 |
-3.7 |
-2.7 |
-2.5 |
|
Non-current Liabilities - Post-Retiremen |
-57.6 |
-55.0 |
-53.9 |
-47.8 |
-43.2 |
|
AOCI-Transition Obligation - Domestic |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
AOCI-Prior Service Cost - Domestic |
-7.6 |
-9.1 |
-10.5 |
-10.9 |
-12.6 |
|
AOCI-Net Actuarial Loss - Domestic |
416.3 |
346.7 |
331.6 |
313.6 |
130.7 |
|
AOCI-Transition Obligation - Foreign |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
|
AOCI-Prior Service Cost - Foreign |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
-0.6 |
- |
|
AOCI-Net Actuarial Loss - Foreign |
4.6 |
5.1 |
6.3 |
0.3 |
- |
|
AOCI-Prior Service Cost - Post-Ret. |
-0.6 |
-1.3 |
-10.6 |
-10.6 |
-20.2 |
|
AOCI-Net Actuarial Loss - Post-Ret. |
19.8 |
18.9 |
14.3 |
14.3 |
9.8 |
|
Net Assets Recognized on Balance Sheet |
228.1 |
195.4 |
120.4 |
103.5 |
97.2 |
|
Domestic Equity % - Pension |
43.28% |
- |
36.00% |
38.00% |
39.00% |
|
International Equity % - Pension |
16.96% |
- |
17.00% |
18.00% |
18.00% |
|
Fixed Income % - Pension |
24.40% |
- |
15.00% |
11.00% |
10.00% |
|
Absolute Ret. Aggressive % - Pension |
14.76% |
- |
22.00% |
17.00% |
17.00% |
|
Absolute Ret. Conservative % - Pension |
- |
- |
- |
12.00% |
12.00% |
|
Cash % - Pension |
0.60% |
- |
10.00% |
4.00% |
4.00% |
|
Fixed Income % - Post-Retirement |
100.00% |
- |
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
|
|
|
Annual Cash Flows |
|
Financials in: USD (mil) |
|
|
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
31-Dec-2007 |
|
Period Length |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
|
UpdateType/Date |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
|
Filed Currency |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
|
Exchange Rate (Period Average) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Auditor |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
Auditor Opinion |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified with Explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
464.4 |
337.4 |
189.6 |
213.0 |
247.3 |
|
Depreciation |
96.8 |
95.6 |
100.5 |
111.7 |
106.9 |
|
Dayton facility
closure charge |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4.9 |
|
Port de Bouc
facility disposition charge |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.4 |
38.5 |
0.0 |
|
Restructuring
charges |
0.0 |
7.0 |
11.6 |
25.8 |
0.0 |
|
Compensation
Payable in Stock & Option |
27.1 |
15.7 |
0.3 |
18.5 |
18.1 |
|
Excess tax benefits
realized from stock- |
-10.6 |
-8.0 |
-2.1 |
-0.4 |
-20.7 |
|
Postretirement plan
elimination gain |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-2.1 |
|
Equity Change-J.V.
& Non-Market Secs. |
-43.8 |
-38.0 |
-22.3 |
-23.1 |
-24.6 |
|
Dividends Reced.
from JV & Secs. |
23.7 |
16.4 |
18.0 |
13.3 |
12.0 |
|
Pension and
postretirement expense |
27.2 |
21.0 |
9.7 |
2.6 |
13.4 |
|
Pension and
postretirement contributions |
-59.8 |
-80.1 |
-39.7 |
-40.3 |
-10.0 |
|
Unrealized (gain)
loss on investments in |
-0.7 |
-1.5 |
-3.6 |
5.0 |
0.0 |
|
Net change in
noncurrent income tax paya |
-0.7 |
2.2 |
-34.0 |
-15.8 |
9.0 |
|
Net change in
noncurrent environmental l |
-1.2 |
2.4 |
-4.6 |
-4.8 |
-7.2 |
|
Deferred Taxes |
14.7 |
47.1 |
1.7 |
-12.0 |
-9.1 |
|
Accounts Receivable |
-16.4 |
-57.4 |
1.3 |
90.5 |
11.2 |
|
Inventories |
-41.7 |
-58.6 |
180.1 |
-87.9 |
-70.6 |
|
(Increase) decrease
in other current ass |
4.5 |
-14.5 |
-5.0 |
-14.2 |
-13.9 |
|
Accounts Payable |
-12.0 |
13.5 |
-53.5 |
33.5 |
-12.6 |
|
(Decrease) increase
in accrued expenses |
28.2 |
35.8 |
-18.7 |
-30.2 |
6.9 |
|
Other net |
-12.2 |
-4.5 |
16.7 |
3.6 |
-12.7 |
|
Cash from Operating Activities |
487.4 |
331.3 |
358.5 |
327.2 |
246.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Expenditures |
-190.6 |
-75.5 |
-100.8 |
-99.7 |
-98.7 |
|
Acquisitions |
-13.2 |
-12.0 |
-4.0 |
-64.0 |
-17.9 |
|
Cash Trans.&
Payments rel. to Thann |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-2.6 |
-11.7 |
|
Cash proceeds from
divestitures |
0.0 |
8.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
|
Cash impact from
deconsolidation of Stan |
0.0 |
-12.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
|
Cash payments
related to the Port de Bo. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-16.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Purch Non-Mkt
Invst. |
-10.9 |
-1.3 |
0.0 |
-0.2 |
-0.1 |
|
Collection of note
receivable from sale |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
6.0 |
0.0 |
|
Investments in
Marketable Securities |
1.7 |
0.7 |
-0.3 |
-3.3 |
-4.9 |
|
Proceeds from sale
of marketable securit |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
|
Cash from Investing Activities |
-212.9 |
-92.2 |
-121.6 |
-163.7 |
-132.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment LT Debt |
-109.6 |
-424.1 |
-134.3 |
-48.2 |
-133.5 |
|
Proc. from
Borrowing |
9.4 |
125.8 |
14.3 |
255.2 |
107.9 |
|
Dividends Paid |
-57.8 |
-49.6 |
-44.4 |
-42.3 |
-40.0 |
|
Repurch. Common |
-178.1 |
-14.9 |
-5.8 |
-169.0 |
-101.2 |
|
Stock Options |
2.2 |
7.1 |
4.2 |
3.9 |
21.9 |
|
Excess tax benefits
realized from stock- |
10.6 |
8.0 |
2.1 |
0.4 |
20.7 |
|
Witholding Tax |
-3.1 |
-4.0 |
-5.1 |
-11.4 |
-3.8 |
|
Divid.
Paid-Minority |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-11.7 |
-13.6 |
-14.3 |
|
Payment of
Financing Costs |
-2.7 |
-3.0 |
0.0 |
-0.1 |
-1.2 |
|
Proceeds from
Issuance of Senior Notes |
0.0 |
346.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
|
Cash from Financing Activities |
-329.1 |
-7.9 |
-180.8 |
-25.0 |
-143.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Effects |
-5.5 |
-10.3 |
-0.6 |
-15.7 |
11.1 |
|
Net Change in Cash |
-60.2 |
220.9 |
55.5 |
122.8 |
-18.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash - Beginning Balance |
529.7 |
308.8 |
253.3 |
130.6 |
149.5 |
|
Net Cash - Ending Balance |
469.4 |
529.7 |
308.8 |
253.3 |
130.6 |
|
Cash Interest Paid |
33.1 |
21.9 |
22.1 |
36.1 |
32.8 |
|
Cash Taxes Paid |
123.3 |
34.8 |
14.8 |
44.6 |
40.3 |
Financial Health
|
Financials in:
USD (mil) |
|
|
Except for
share items (millions) and per share items (actual units) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio Comparisons
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Ratios
|
Financials in:
USD (mil) |
|
|
Except for share
items (millions) and per share items (actual units) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standard & Poors
|
United
States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' Due To Political Risks,
Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative |
|
Publication
date: 05-Aug-2011 20:13:14 EST |
We have lowered our long-term sovereign
credit rating on the United States of America to 'AA+' from 'AAA' and affirmed
the 'A-1+' short-term rating.
We have also removed both the short- and long-term ratings
from CreditWatch negative.
The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation
plan that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of
what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government's medium-term
debt dynamics.
More broadly, the downgrade reflects our view that
the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policymaking and
political institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic
challenges to a degree more than we envisioned when we assigned a negative
outlook to the rating on April 18, 2011.
Since then, we have changed our view of the
difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties over fiscal
policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the
Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader
fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics any
time soon.
The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. We
could lower the long-term rating to 'AA' within the next two years if we see
that less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, or new
fiscal pressures during the period result in a higher general government debt
trajectory than we currently assume in our base case.
TORONTO (Standard &
Poor's) Aug. 5, 2011--Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said today that it
lowered its long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America
to 'AA+' from 'AAA'. Standard & Poor's also said that the outlook on the
long-term rating is negative. At the same time, Standard & Poor's affirmed
its 'A-1+' short-term rating on the U.S. In addition, Standard & Poor's
removed both ratings from CreditWatch, where they were placed on July 14, 2011,
with negative implications.
The transfer and
convertibility (T&C) assessment of the U.S.--our assessment of the
likelihood of official interference in the ability of U.S.-based public- and
private-sector issuers to secure foreign exchange for
debt service--remains
'AAA'.
We lowered our long-term
rating on the U.S. because we believe that the prolonged controversy over
raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate
indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public
spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an agreement on raising
revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a
contentious and fitful process. We also believe that the fiscal consolidation
plan that Congress and the Administration agreed to this week falls short of
the amount that we believe is necessary to stabilize the general government
debt burden by the middle of the decade.
Our lowering of the
rating was prompted by our view on the rising public debt burden and our
perception of greater policymaking uncertainty, consistent with our criteria
(see "Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and
Assumptions ," June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41).
Nevertheless, we view the U.S. federal government's other economic, external,
and monetary credit attributes, which form the basis for the sovereign rating,
as broadly unchanged.
We have taken the ratings
off CreditWatch because the Aug. 2 passage of the Budget Control Act Amendment
of 2011 has removed any perceived immediate threat of payment default posed by
delays to raising the government's debt ceiling. In addition, we believe that
the act provides sufficient clarity to allow us to evaluate the likely course
of U.S. fiscal policy for the next few years.
The political
brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America's governance
and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable
than what we previously believed. The statutory debt ceiling and the threat of
default have become political bargaining chips in the debate over fiscal
policy. Despite this year's wide-ranging debate, in our view, the differences
between political parties have proven to be extraordinarily difficult to
bridge, and, as we see it, the resulting agreement fell well short of the
comprehensive fiscal consolidation program that some proponents had envisaged
until quite recently. Republicans and Democrats have only been able to agree to
relatively modest savings on discretionary spending while delegating to the
Select Committee decisions on more comprehensive measures. It appears that for
now, new revenues have dropped down on the menu of policy options. In addition,
the plan envisions only minor policy changes on Medicare and little change in other
entitlements,
the containment of which
we and most other independent observers regard as key to long-term fiscal
sustainability.
Our opinion is that
elected officials remain wary of tackling the structural issues required to
effectively address the rising U.S. public debt burden in a manner consistent
with a 'AAA' rating and with 'AAA' rated sovereign peers (see Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and Assumptions,"
June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41). In our view, the difficulty in
framing a consensus on fiscal policy weakens the government's ability to manage
public finances and diverts attention from the debate over how to achieve more
balanced and dynamic economic growth in an era of fiscal stringency and
private-sector deleveraging (ibid). A new political consensus might (or might
not) emerge after the 2012 elections, but we believe that by then, the
government debt burden will likely be higher, the needed medium-term fiscal
adjustment potentially greater, and the inflection point on the U.S.
population's demographics and other age-related spending drivers closer at hand
(see "Global Aging 2011: In The U.S., Going Gray Will Likely
Cost Even More Green, Now," June 21, 2011).
Standard & Poor's
takes no position on the mix of spending and revenue measures that Congress and
the Administration might conclude is appropriate for putting the U.S.'s
finances on a sustainable footing.
The act calls for as much
as $2.4 trillion of reductions in expenditure growth over the 10 years through
2021. These cuts will be implemented in two steps: the $917 billion agreed to
initially, followed by an additional $1.5 trillion that the newly formed
Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction is supposed to
recommend by November 2011. The act contains no measures to raise taxes or
otherwise enhance revenues, though the committee could recommend them.
The act further provides
that if Congress does not enact the committee's recommendations, cuts of $1.2
trillion will be implemented over the same time period. The reductions would
mainly affect outlays for civilian discretionary spending, defense, and
Medicare. We understand that this fall-back mechanism is designed to encourage
Congress to embrace a more balanced mix of expenditure savings, as the
committee might recommend.
We note that in a letter
to Congress on Aug. 1, 2011, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated
total budgetary savings under the act to be at least $2.1 trillion over the
next 10 years relative to its baseline assumptions. In updating our own fiscal
projections, with certain modifications outlined below, we have relied on the
CBO's latest "Alternate Fiscal Scenario" of June 2011, updated to
include the CBO assumptions contained in its Aug. 1 letter to Congress. In
general, the CBO's "Alternate Fiscal Scenario" assumes a continuation
of recent Congressional action overriding existing law.
We view the act's
measures as a step toward fiscal consolidation. However, this is within the
framework of a legislative mechanism that leaves open the details of what is
finally agreed to until the end of 2011, and Congress and the Administration
could modify any agreement in the future. Even assuming that at least $2.1
trillion of the spending reductions the act envisages are implemented, we
maintain our view that the U.S. net general government debt burden (all levels
of government combined, excluding liquid financial assets) will likely continue
to grow. Under our revised base case fiscal scenario--which we consider to be
consistent with a 'AA+' long-term rating and a negative outlook--we now project
that net general government debt would rise from an estimated 74% of GDP by the
end of 2011 to 79% in 2015 and 85% by 2021. Even the projected 2015 ratio of
sovereign indebtedness is high in relation to those of peer credits and, as
noted, would continue to rise under the act's revised policy settings.
Compared with previous
projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003
tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed
our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue
to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress
reinforced by passing the act. Key macroeconomic assumptions in the base case
scenario include trend real GDP growth of 3% and consumer price inflation near
2% annually over the decade.
Our revised upside
scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as consistent with the
outlook on the 'AA+' long-term rating being revised to stable--retains these same
macroeconomic assumptions. In addition, it incorporates $950 billion of new
revenues on the assumption that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high earners
lapse from 2013 onwards, as the Administration is advocating. In this scenario,
we project that the net general government debt would rise from an estimated
74% of GDP by the end of 2011 to 77% in 2015 and to 78% by 2021.
Our revised downside
scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as being consistent with a
possible further downgrade to a 'AA' long-term rating--features less-favorable
macroeconomic assumptions, as outlined below and also assumes that the second
round of spending cuts (at least $1.2 trillion) that the act calls for does not
occur. This scenario also assumes somewhat higher nominal interest rates for
U.S. Treasuries. We still believe that the role of the U.S. dollar as the key
reserve currency confers a government funding advantage, one that could change
only slowly over time, and that Fed policy might lean toward continued loose
monetary policy at a time of fiscal tightening. Nonetheless, it is possible
that interest rates could rise if investors re-price relative risks. As a
result, our alternate scenario factors in a 50 basis point (bp)-75 bp rise in
10-year bond yields relative to the base and upside cases from 2013 onwards. In
this scenario, we project the net public debt burden would rise from 74% of GDP
in 2011 to 90% in 2015 and to 101% by 2021.
Our revised scenarios
also take into account the significant negative revisions to historical GDP
data that the Bureau of Economic Analysis announced on July 29. From our
perspective, the effect of these revisions underscores two related points when
evaluating the likely debt trajectory of the U.S. government. First, the
revisions show that the recent recession was deeper than previously assumed, so
the GDP this year is lower than previously thought in both nominal and real
terms. Consequently, the debt burden is slightly higher. Second, the revised
data highlight the sub-par path of the current economic recovery when compared
with rebounds following previous post-war recessions. We believe the sluggish
pace of the current economic recovery could be consistent with the experiences
of countries that have had financial crises in which the slow process of debt
deleveraging in the private sector leads to a persistent drag on demand. As a
result, our downside case scenario assumes relatively modest real trend GDP
growth of 2.5% and inflation of near 1.5% annually going forward.
When comparing the U.S.
to sovereigns with 'AAA' long-term ratings that we view as relevant
peers--Canada, France, Germany, and the U.K.--we also observe, based on our
base case scenarios for each, that the trajectory of the U.S.'s net public debt
is diverging from the others. Including the U.S., we estimate that these five
sovereigns will have net general government debt to GDP ratios this year
ranging from 34% (Canada) to 80% (the U.K.), with the U.S. debt burden at 74%.
By 2015, we project that their net public debt to GDP ratios will range between
30% (lowest, Canada) and 83% (highest, France), with the U.S. debt burden at
79%. However, in contrast with the U.S., we project that the net public debt
burdens of these other sovereigns will begin to decline, either before or by
2015.
Standard & Poor's
transfer T&C assessment of the U.S. remains 'AAA'. Our T&C assessment
reflects our view of the likelihood of the sovereign restricting other public
and private issuers' access to foreign exchange needed to meet debt service.
Although in our view the credit standing of the U.S. government has
deteriorated modestly, we see little indication that official interference of
this kind is entering onto the policy agenda of either Congress or the
Administration. Consequently, we continue to view this risk as being highly
remote.
The outlook on the
long-term rating is negative. As our downside alternate fiscal scenario
illustrates, a higher public debt trajectory than we currently assume could
lead us to lower the long-term rating again. On the other hand, as our upside
scenario highlights, if the recommendations of the Congressional Joint Select
Committee on Deficit Reduction--independently or coupled with other
initiatives, such as the lapsing of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high
earners--lead to fiscal consolidation measures beyond the minimum mandated, and
we believe they are likely to slow the deterioration of the government's debt
dynamics, the long-term rating could stabilize at 'AA+'.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.54.84 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.88.16 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.71.54 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Report
Prepared by : |
PRL |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit transaction.
It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest and
principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable
factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of
interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with full
security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SCs credit risk and
to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.