|
Report Date : |
21.03.2013 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
REXNORD INDUSTRIES, LLC |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
4701 W. Greenfield Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53214 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
United States |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
05.08.1988 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
LLC |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Manufactures, and markets process and motion control, and water
management products |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
7,400 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Slow but correct |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – June 30th, 2012
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.03.2012) |
Current Rating (30.06.2012) |
|
United States |
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
The US has the largest and most technologically powerful economy in the world, with a per capita GDP of $48,100. In this market-oriented economy, private individuals and business firms make most of the decisions, and the federal and state governments buy needed goods and services predominantly in the private marketplace. US business firms enjoy greater flexibility than their counterparts in Western Europe and Japan in decisions to expand capital plant, to lay off surplus workers, and to develop new products. At the same time, they face higher barriers to enter their rivals' home markets than foreign firms face entering US markets. US firms are at or near the forefront in technological advances, especially in computers and in medical, aerospace, and military equipment; their advantage has narrowed since the end of World War II. The onrush of technology largely explains the gradual development of a "two-tier labor market" in which those at the bottom lack the education and the professional/technical skills of those at the top and, more and more, fail to get comparable pay raises, health insurance coverage, and other benefits. Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households. Since 1996, dividends and capital gains have grown faster than wages or any other category of after-tax income. Imported oil accounts for nearly 55% of US consumption. Oil prices doubled between 2001 and 2006, the year home prices peaked; higher gasoline prices ate into consumers' budgets and many individuals fell behind in their mortgage payments. Oil prices increased another 50% between 2006 and 2008. In 2008, soaring oil prices threatened inflation and caused a deterioration in the US merchandise trade deficit, which peaked at $840 billion. In 2009, with the global recession deepening, oil prices dropped 40% and the US trade deficit shrank, as US domestic demand declined, but in 2011 the trade deficit ramped back up to $803 billion, as oil prices climbed once more. The global economic downturn, the sub-prime mortgage crisis, investment bank failures, falling home prices, and tight credit pushed the United States into a recession by mid-2008. GDP contracted until the third quarter of 2009, making this the deepest and longest downturn since the Great Depression. To help stabilize financial markets, in October 2008 the US Congress established a $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). The government used some of these funds to purchase equity in US banks and industrial corporations, much of which had been returned to the government by early 2011. In January 2009 the US Congress passed and President Barack OBAMA signed a bill providing an additional $787 billion fiscal stimulus to be used over 10 years - two-thirds on additional spending and one-third on tax cuts - to create jobs and to help the economy recover. In 2010 and 2011, the federal budget deficit reached nearly 9% of GDP; total government revenues from taxes and other sources are lower, as a percentage of GDP, than that of most other developed countries. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan required major shifts in national resources from civilian to military purposes and contributed to the growth of the US budget deficit and public debt - through 2011, the direct costs of the wars totaled nearly $900 billion, according to US government figures. In March 2010, President OBAMA signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a health insurance reform bill that will extend coverage to an additional 32 million American citizens by 2016, through private health insurance for the general population and Medicaid for the impoverished. Total spending on health care - public plus private - rose from 9.0% of GDP in 1980 to 17.9% in 2010. In July 2010, the president signed the DODD-FRANK Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, a law designed to promote financial stability by protecting consumers from financial abuses, ending taxpayer bailouts of financial firms, dealing with troubled banks that are "too big to fail," and improving accountability and transparency in the financial system - in particular, by requiring certain financial derivatives to be traded in markets that are subject to government regulation and oversight. Long-term problems include inadequate investment in deteriorating infrastructure, rapidly rising medical and pension costs of an aging population, sizable current account and budget deficits - including significant budget shortages for state governments - energy shortages, and stagnation of wages for lower-income families.
|
Source
: CIA |
REXNORD INDUSTRIES, LLC
Your order on: REXNORD
INDUSTRIES, INC.
The correct name is:
Company name: REXNORD
INDUSTRIES, LLC
Address: 4701
W. Greenfield Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53214 - USA
Telephone: +1
414-643-3000
Fax: +1
414-643-3078
Website: www.rexnord.com
Corporate ID#: 2168721
State: Delaware
Judicial form: LLC
Date incorporated: August 5, 1988
Stock Value: A LLC has no stock.
Name of manager: Todd A. ADAMS
History:
REXNORD INDUSTRIES, INC. was incorporated on August 5, 1988, and
transformed into REXNORD INDUSTRIES, LLC on June 30, 2006.
Business:
Rexnord Industries, LLC designs,
manufactures, and markets process and motion control, and water management
products. Its process and motion control products include engineered mechanical
system components, such as industrial bearings, couplings, gears, modular
conveyor belting products, and industrial chains. The company also provides
water management products that provide and enhance water quality, safety, flow
control, and conservation for external agencies, engineering and design firms,
municipalities, and owners.
In addition, it offers steel castings,
remanufactured gear drives, and service parts; field, installation assistance,
and gearbox repair services; and technical services, including confidential
testing, analysis, and engineering services. The company serves aerospace,
construction, energy, food and beverage, hydropower, manufacturing, mining,
municipal waterwork, petrochemical, and wind energy industries worldwide.
Rexnord Industries, LLC operates as a
subsidiary of Rexnord Corporation.
Suppliers include:
TIEN YUEN MACHINERY MFG. CO., LTD.
188, Wu Chuan West Road, Sec. 3, Taichung, Taiwan
EIN: -
Staff: 7,400 (for
the group)
Operations & branches:
At the headquarters, we find the corporate office of the group.
The Company maintains several branches in the U.S. including:
5555 S. Moorland Road
New Berlin, WI 53151
Shareholders:
REXNORD CORP.
4701 W. Greenfield Avenue, Milwaukee, WI
53214
Rexnord Corporation designs, manufactures,
markets, and services process and motion control, and water management products
worldwide.
The Company is listed with the NYSE under symbol RXN.
Management:
Todd A. ADAMS is the President and CEO
Mr. Todd A. Adams serves as the Chief
Executive Officer and President at Rexnord Industries, LLC. Mr. Adams has been
the Chief Executive Officer and President of RBS Global Inc. and Rexnord
Holdings, Inc. since September 11, 2009 and its subsidiary Rexnord LLC since
September 14, 2009.
He served as the Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President of Rexnord Holdings, Inc., from April 2008 to September
2009 and served as its Principal Accounting Officer. Mr. Adams joined Rexnord
Holdings, Inc. in 2004 as Vice President, Treasurer and Director of Financial
Reporting.
Prior to Rexnord, he served as Director of
Financial Planning and Analysis at The Boeing Company from February 2003 to
July 2004, Vice President and Controller of APW Ltd. from July 2000 to February
2003 and Vice President & Controller of Actuant Corporation (formerly known
as Applied Power Inc.) from May 1998 to July 2000. Mr. Adams served as Acting
President of Water Management Group since May 1, 2009. He served as the Chief
Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Rexnord LLC, from April 1, 2008
to September 2009 and also served as its Principal Accounting Officer. He
served as Controller and Treasurer of Rexnord LLC since July 2004. He served as
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of RBS Global, Inc. since
April 1, 2008 and its Controller and Treasurer since July 2004. Mr. Adams
served as Vice President of RBS Global, Inc. since July 2004 and also as
Principal Accounting Officer. He served as Vice President of Rexnord LLC from
July 2004 to April 2008. He has been Director of RBS Global Inc. since October
2009.
He has been Director of Rexnord Holdings,
Inc. and Rexnord LLC since October 2009. He is a Certified Public Accountant.
Mr. Adams holds a BS in Finance from Eastern Illinois University.
Michael A. SHPIRO is Vice President and CFO.
Subsidiaries
And partnership: None
Rexnord Industries, LLC reported financials
for the full year of fiscal 2011.
For the year, the company's net sales
increased 13% from the prior year to
USD 1,700 million.
Core sales growth was also 13% in fiscal
2011.
Income from operations increased 36% from
the prior year to USD 219 million. Adjusted EBITDA was USD 336 million or 19.8%
of net sales compared to 18.9% last year.
Free cash flow was USD 127 million as trade
working capital as a percent of sales declined to 20% from 23% in the prior
year.
Banks: Wells Faro Bank
...
Legal filings & complaints:
As of today date, there is no legal filing
pending with the Courts.
State: Pennsylvania
Case number: 1:12-cv-00311-SJM
Plaintiff: Clarendon ARNDT
Defendant: REXNORD INDUSTRIES
Sean J. McLaughlin, presiding
Date filed: 12/11/2012
Date of last filing: 03/08/2013
State: Wisconsin
Case number: 2:11-cv-00777-NJ
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission
Defendant: Rexnord Industries LLC
Nancy Joseph, presiding
Date filed: 08/18/2011
Date of last filing: 03/15/2013
State: Milwaukee
Case number: 2:12-cv-00261-LA
Plaintiff: Rexnord Industries LLC
Defendant: Bigge Power Constructors
Lynn Adelman, presiding
Date filed: 03/16/2012
Date of last filing: 02/20/2013
Secured debts summary (UCC):
Case number: 13000478524
Date filed: 01-09-2013
Lapse date: 01-09-2018
Secured Party: Cargill Incorporated
15407 McGinty Road West, Wayzata, MN 55391
Case number: 120015410516
Date filed: 12-04-2012
Lapse date: 12-04-2017
Secured Party: Cargill Incorporated
15407 McGinty Road West, Wayzata, MN 55391
Case number: 120008439832
Date filed: 06-21-2012
Lapse date: 06-21-2017
Secured Party: Toolmex Corporation
1075 Worcester Street, Natick, MA 01760
Case number: 090004279527
Date filed: 04-08-2009
Lapse date: 04-08-2014
Secured Party: P&H Mining Equipment Inc.
4400 W. National Avenue, Milwaukee, MN 53201
Haut du formulaire
Trade references:
Date reported: March 2013
High credit: USD 32,000
Now owing: 0
Past due: 0
Last purchase: February 2013
Line of business: Office
supply
Paying status: 8 days beyond
terms
Date reported: March 2013
High credit: USD 300,000+
Now owing: 0
Past due: 0
Last purchase: February 2013
Line of business: Payroll
Paying status: As agreed
Date reported: March 2013
High credit: USD 12,000
Now owing: 0
Past due: 0
Last purchase: February 2013
Line of business: Telecommunications
Paying status: 8 days beyond
terms
Domestic credit history:
Domestic credit history appears as follow:
|
Monthly
Payment Trends - Recent Activity |
|
National Credit Bureaus gave a medium credit rating.
According to our credit analysts, during the
last 6 months, payments were made with an average of 8 to 10 days beyond terms.
International
credit history:
Payments of imports are currently made with
an average of 2 to 5 days beyond terms.
Other comments:
The Company maintains a regular business.
The Company is in good standing.
This means that all local and federal taxes were paid on due date.
The risk is medium/low.
Our opinion:
A business connection may be conducted.
Standard & Poor’s
|
United
States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' Due To Political Risks,
Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative |
|
Publication
date: 05-Aug-2011 20:13:14 EST |
·
We have also removed both the short- and long-term ratings
from CreditWatch negative.
·
The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal
consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to
falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the
government's medium-term debt dynamics.
·
More broadly, the downgrade reflects our view that the
effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policymaking and
political institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic
challenges to a degree more than we envisioned when we assigned a negative
outlook to the rating on April 18, 2011.
·
Since then, we have changed our view of the difficulties in
bridging the gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes
us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able
to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan
that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics any time soon.
·
The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. We could
lower the long-term rating to 'AA' within the next two years if we see that
less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, or new fiscal
pressures during the period result in a higher general government debt
trajectory than we currently assume in our base case.
TORONTO (Standard &
Poor's) Aug. 5, 2011--Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said today that it
lowered its long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America
to 'AA+' from 'AAA'. Standard & Poor's also said that the outlook on the
long-term rating is negative. At the same time, Standard & Poor's affirmed
its 'A-1+' short-term rating on the U.S. In addition, Standard & Poor's
removed both ratings from CreditWatch, where they were placed on July 14, 2011,
with negative implications.
The
transfer and convertibility (T&C) assessment of the U.S.--our assessment of
the likelihood of official interference in the ability of U.S.-based public-
and private-sector issuers to secure foreign exchange for
debt service--remains
'AAA'.
We lowered our long-term
rating on the U.S. because we believe that the prolonged controversy over
raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate
indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public
spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an agreement on raising
revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a
contentious and fitful process. We also believe that the fiscal consolidation
plan that Congress and the Administration agreed to this week falls short of
the amount that we believe is necessary to stabilize the general government
debt burden by the middle of the decade.
Our lowering of the
rating was prompted by our view on the rising public debt burden and our
perception of greater policymaking uncertainty, consistent with our criteria
(see "Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and
Assumptions ," June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41).
Nevertheless, we view the U.S. federal government's other economic, external,
and monetary credit attributes, which form the basis for the sovereign rating,
as broadly unchanged.
We have taken the ratings
off CreditWatch because the Aug. 2 passage of the Budget Control Act Amendment
of 2011 has removed any perceived immediate threat of payment default posed by
delays to raising the government's debt ceiling. In addition, we believe that
the act provides sufficient clarity to allow us to evaluate the likely course
of U.S. fiscal policy for the next few years.
The
political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America's
governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less
predictable than what we previously believed. The statutory debt ceiling and
the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in the debate over
fiscal policy. Despite this year's wide-ranging debate, in our view, the
differences between political parties have proven to be extraordinarily difficult
to bridge, and, as we see it, the resulting agreement fell well short of the
comprehensive fiscal consolidation program that some proponents had envisaged
until quite recently. Republicans and Democrats have only been able to agree to
relatively modest savings on discretionary spending while delegating to the
Select Committee decisions on more comprehensive measures. It appears that for
now, new revenues have dropped down on the menu of policy options. In addition,
the plan envisions only minor policy changes on Medicare and little change in
other entitlements,
the containment of which
we and most other independent observers regard as key to long-term fiscal
sustainability.
Our opinion is that
elected officials remain wary of tackling the structural issues required to
effectively address the rising U.S. public debt burden in a manner consistent
with a 'AAA' rating and with 'AAA' rated sovereign peers (see Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and
Assumptions," June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41). In
our view, the difficulty in framing a consensus on fiscal policy weakens the
government's ability to manage public finances and diverts attention from the debate
over how to achieve more balanced and dynamic economic growth in an era of
fiscal stringency and private-sector deleveraging (ibid). A new political
consensus might (or might not) emerge after the 2012 elections, but we believe
that by then, the government debt burden will likely be higher, the needed
medium-term fiscal adjustment potentially greater, and the inflection point on
the U.S. population's demographics and other age-related spending drivers
closer at hand (see "Global Aging 2011: In The U.S., Going Gray Will Likely
Cost Even More Green, Now," June 21, 2011).
Standard & Poor's
takes no position on the mix of spending and revenue measures that Congress and
the Administration might conclude is appropriate for putting the U.S.'s
finances on a sustainable footing.
The act calls for as much
as $2.4 trillion of reductions in expenditure growth over the 10 years through
2021. These cuts will be implemented in two steps: the $917 billion agreed to
initially, followed by an additional $1.5 trillion that the newly formed
Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction is supposed to
recommend by November 2011. The act contains no measures to raise taxes or
otherwise enhance revenues, though the committee could recommend them.
The act further provides
that if Congress does not enact the committee's recommendations, cuts of $1.2
trillion will be implemented over the same time period. The reductions would
mainly affect outlays for civilian discretionary spending, defense, and
Medicare. We understand that this fall-back mechanism is designed to encourage
Congress to embrace a more balanced mix of expenditure savings, as the
committee might recommend.
We note that in a letter
to Congress on Aug. 1, 2011, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated
total budgetary savings under the act to be at least $2.1 trillion over the
next 10 years relative to its baseline assumptions. In updating our own fiscal
projections, with certain modifications outlined below, we have relied on the
CBO's latest "Alternate Fiscal Scenario" of June 2011, updated to
include the CBO assumptions contained in its Aug. 1 letter to Congress. In
general, the CBO's "Alternate Fiscal Scenario" assumes a continuation
of recent Congressional action overriding existing law.
We view the act's
measures as a step toward fiscal consolidation. However, this is within the
framework of a legislative mechanism that leaves open the details of what is
finally agreed to until the end of 2011, and Congress and the Administration
could modify any agreement in the future. Even assuming that at least $2.1
trillion of the spending reductions the act envisages are implemented, we
maintain our view that the U.S. net general government debt burden (all levels
of government combined, excluding liquid financial assets) will likely continue
to grow. Under our revised base case fiscal scenario--which we consider to be
consistent with a 'AA+' long-term rating and a negative outlook--we now project
that net general government debt would rise from an estimated 74% of GDP by the
end of 2011 to 79% in 2015 and 85% by 2021. Even the projected 2015 ratio of
sovereign indebtedness is high in relation to those of peer credits and, as
noted, would continue to rise under the act's revised policy settings.
Compared with previous
projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax
cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed our
assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to
resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress
reinforced by passing the act. Key macroeconomic assumptions in the base case
scenario include trend real GDP growth of 3% and consumer price inflation near
2% annually over the decade.
Our revised upside
scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as consistent with the
outlook on the 'AA+' long-term rating being revised to stable--retains these
same macroeconomic assumptions. In addition, it incorporates $950 billion of
new revenues on the assumption that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high earners
lapse from 2013 onwards, as the Administration is advocating. In this scenario,
we project that the net general government debt would rise from an estimated
74% of GDP by the end of 2011 to 77% in 2015 and to 78% by 2021.
Our revised downside
scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as being consistent with a
possible further downgrade to a 'AA' long-term rating--features less-favorable
macroeconomic assumptions, as outlined below and also assumes that the second
round of spending cuts (at least $1.2 trillion) that the act calls for does not
occur. This scenario also assumes somewhat higher nominal interest rates for
U.S. Treasuries. We still believe that the role of the U.S. dollar as the key
reserve currency confers a government funding advantage, one that could change
only slowly over time, and that Fed policy might lean toward continued loose
monetary policy at a time of fiscal tightening. Nonetheless, it is possible
that interest rates could rise if investors re-price relative risks. As a
result, our alternate scenario factors in a 50 basis point (bp)-75 bp rise in
10-year bond yields relative to the base and upside cases from 2013 onwards. In
this scenario, we project the net public debt burden would rise from 74% of GDP
in 2011 to 90% in 2015 and to 101% by 2021.
Our revised scenarios
also take into account the significant negative revisions to historical GDP
data that the Bureau of Economic Analysis announced on July 29. From our
perspective, the effect of these revisions underscores two related points when evaluating
the likely debt trajectory of the U.S. government. First, the revisions show
that the recent recession was deeper than previously assumed, so the GDP this
year is lower than previously thought in both nominal and real terms.
Consequently, the debt burden is slightly higher. Second, the revised data
highlight the sub-par path of the current economic recovery when compared with
rebounds following previous post-war recessions. We believe the sluggish pace
of the current economic recovery could be consistent with the experiences of
countries that have had financial crises in which the slow process of debt
deleveraging in the private sector leads to a persistent drag on demand. As a
result, our downside case scenario assumes relatively modest real trend GDP
growth of 2.5% and inflation of near 1.5% annually going forward.
When comparing the U.S.
to sovereigns with 'AAA' long-term ratings that we view as relevant
peers--Canada, France, Germany, and the U.K.--we also observe, based on our base
case scenarios for each, that the trajectory of the U.S.'s net public debt is
diverging from the others. Including the U.S., we estimate that these five
sovereigns will have net general government debt to GDP ratios this year
ranging from 34% (Canada) to 80% (the U.K.), with the U.S. debt burden at 74%.
By 2015, we project that their net public debt to GDP ratios will range between
30% (lowest, Canada) and 83% (highest, France), with the U.S. debt burden at
79%. However, in contrast with the U.S., we project that the net public debt
burdens of these other sovereigns will begin to decline, either before or by
2015.
Standard & Poor's
transfer T&C assessment of the U.S. remains 'AAA'. Our T&C assessment
reflects our view of the likelihood of the sovereign restricting other public
and private issuers' access to foreign exchange needed to meet debt service.
Although in our view the credit standing of the U.S. government has
deteriorated modestly, we see little indication that official interference of
this kind is entering onto the policy agenda of either Congress or the
Administration. Consequently, we continue to view this risk as being highly
remote.
The outlook on the
long-term rating is negative. As our downside alternate fiscal scenario
illustrates, a higher public debt trajectory than we currently assume could
lead us to lower the long-term rating again. On the other hand, as our upside
scenario highlights, if the recommendations of the Congressional Joint Select
Committee on Deficit Reduction--independently or coupled with other
initiatives, such as the lapsing of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high
earners--lead to fiscal consolidation measures beyond the minimum mandated, and
we believe they are likely to slow the deterioration of the government's debt
dynamics, the long-term rating could stabilize at 'AA+'.
On
Monday, we will issue separate releases concerning affected ratings in the
funds, government-related entities, financial institutions, insurance, public
finance, and structured finance sectors.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.54.37 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.82.07 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.70.03 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Report Prepared
by : |
PDT |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit transaction.
It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest and
principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable
factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of
interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with full
security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This score serves as a reference to assess
SC’s credit risk and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is
calculated from a composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major
sections of this report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as
indicated through %) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend (10%) Operational size
(10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.