|
Report Date : |
29.03.2013 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
JERY
GEMS CO., LTD. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
Unit 508, 5th Floor, Piyamitr Building, Mahaesak Road, Suriyawongse, Bangrak, Bangkok 10500 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Thailand |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2011 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
19.02.2009 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
0105552016971 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Importer, distributor and
exporter of gems and jewelry
products |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
02 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Usually Correct |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES:
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – June 30th, 2012
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.03.2012) |
Current Rating (30.06.2012) |
|
Thailand |
B1 |
B1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
thailand - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
With a well-developed infrastructure, a free-enterprise economy,
generally pro-investment policies, and strong export industries, Thailand
enjoyed solid growth from 2000 to 2007 - averaging more than 4% per year - as
it recovered from the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98. Thai exports - mostly
machinery and electronic components, agricultural commodities, and jewelry -
continue to drive the economy, accounting for more than half of GDP. The global
financial crisis of 2008-09 severely cut Thailand's exports, with most sectors
experiencing double-digit drops. In 2009, the economy contracted 2.3%. In 2010,
Thailand's economy expanded 7.8%, its fastest pace since 1995, as exports
rebounded from their depressed 2009 level. Steady economic growth at just below
4% during the first three quarters of 2011 was interrupted by historic flooding
in October and November in the industrial areas north of Bangkok, crippling the
manufacturing sector and leading to a revised growth rate of only 0.1% for the
year. The industrial sector is poised to recover from the second quarter of
2012 onward, however, and the government anticipates the economy will probably
grow between 5.5 and 6.5% for 2012, while private sector forecasts range
between 3.8% and 5.7%.
|
Source : CIA |
JERY GEMS CO.,
LTD.
BUSINESS
ADDRESS : UNIT
508, 5th FLOOR,
PIYAMITR BUILDING,
99
MAHAESAK
ROAD, SURIYAWONGSE,
BANGRAK,
BANGKOK 10500, THAILAND
TELEPHONE : [66] 2635-6384,
081 629-5670
FAX : [66] 2635-8326
E-MAIL
ADDRESS : askarib@hotmail.com
REGISTRATION
ADDRESS : SAME
AS BUSINESS ADDRESS
ESTABLISHED
: 2009
REGISTRATION
NO. : 0105552016971
TAX
ID NO. : 3033377415
CAPITAL REGISTERED : BHT. 2,000,000
CAPITAL PAID-UP : BHT.
2,000,000
SHAREHOLDER’S PROPORTION : THAI :
51%
INDIAN
: 49%
FISCAL YEAR CLOSING DATE : DECEMBER 31
LEGAL
STATUS : PRIVATE LIMITED
COMPANY
EXECUTIVE : MR. SYED MOHAMMED
ASKARI, INDIAN
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.
OF STAFF : 2
LINES
OF BUSINESS : GEMS
AND JEWELRY PRODUCTS
IMPORTER,
DISTRIBUTOR AND EXPORTER
OPERATING
TREND : STABLE
PRESENT
SITUATION : OPERATING NORMALLY
REPUTATION : GOOD
WITH NORMAL BUSINESS
ENGAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
STANDARD : MANAGEMENT WITH
GOOD PERFORMANCE
The
subject was established
on February 19, 2009
as a private
limited company under the
registered name JERY
GEMS CO., LTD.,
by Thai and Indian
groups, with the business
objective to import,
distribute, and export
various kinds of
gems and jewelry products. It currently employs
2 staff.
The
subject’s registered address
is Unit 508, 5th Floor,
Piyamitr Building, 99
Mahaesak Rd., Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok 10500, and
this is the
subject’s current operation
address.
Mr. Syed Mohammed Askari
The above director
signs on behalf
of the subject
with company’s affixed.
Mr. Syed Mohammed Askari
is the Managing
Director.
He is Indian
nationality with the
age of 46
years old.
The subject
is engaged in
importing and distributing
various kinds of
gemstones and jewelry
products, as well
as exporting of
Thai jewelry products.
PURCHASE
Its
products are purchased
from suppliers both
domestic and overseas,
mainly in India.
SALES
100% of the
products is sold
locally to wholesalers,
manufacturers and end-users.
EXPORT
The Thai products
are exported to
India and Hong
Kong.
SUBSIDIARY AND AFFILIATED
COMPANY
The subject is
not found to
have any subsidiary
or affiliated company
here in Thailand.
LITIGATION
Bankruptcy and
Receivership
There are no
litigation on bankruptcy
and receivership cases
filed against the
subject found at
Legal Execution Department
for the past
five years.
Others
There are no
legal suits filed
against the subject
for the past
two years.
CREDIT
Sales are by
cash or on
the credits term
of 30-60 days.
Local bills are
paid by cash
or on the
credits term of
30-60 days.
Imports are by
T/T.
Exports are against
T/T.
BANKING
Kasikornbank
Public Co., Ltd.
EMPLOYMENT
The
subject currently employs
2 staff.
LOCATION
DETAILS
The
premise is rented for
administrative office at
the heading address.
Premise is located
in a prime
commercial area.
COMMENT
The subject
was formed in February 2009
as an importer
and distributor of gemstones
and jewelry products.
Subject reported moderate
sales in 2011. However,
export jewelry products
has earned better
income in the
year 2012, while
its current business
outlook is fair.
The capital
was registered at
Bht. 2,000,000 divided into
2,000 shares of Bht. 1,000
each with fully
paid.
THE
SHAREHOLDERS LISTED WERE
: [as at
April 30, 2012]
|
NAME |
HOLDING |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Ruengthip Thonarin Nationality: Thai Address : 85
Moo 7, T. Phrathart, A. Nadoon,
Mahasarakham |
1,020 |
51.00 |
|
Mr. Syed Mohammed Askari Nationality: Indian Address : 410/126
Surawong Rd., Suriyawongse, Bangrak, Bangkok
|
960 |
48.00 |
|
Mrs. Syedda Tamanna Babu Nationality: Indian Address : 410/126
Surawong Rd., Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok |
10 |
0.50 |
|
Mr. Syed Dawud Raja Nationality: Indian Address : 99
Mahaesak Rd., Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok |
10 |
0.50 |
Total Shareholders : 4
Share Structure [as
at April 30,
2012]
|
Nationality |
Shareholders |
No. of Share |
% Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thai |
1 |
1,020 |
51.00 |
|
Foreign-Indian |
3 |
980 |
49.00 |
|
Total |
4 |
2,000 |
100.00 |
NAME OF AUDITOR
& CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANT NO. :
Mr. Narith Kanchanajul No.
4970
The latest financial figures published
as at December 31,
2011, 2010 &
2009 were:
ASSETS
|
Current Assets |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
45,203.39 |
45,292.98 |
517,159.17 |
|
Trade Accounts & Other
Receivable |
7,006,943.18 |
3,038,742.63 |
686,572.21 |
|
Inventories |
2,103,142.28 |
1,343,710.56 |
1,379,396.24 |
|
Other Current Assets
|
- |
- |
146,292.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
9,155,288.85 |
4,427,746.17 |
2,729,420.31 |
|
Long-term Lending to Related
Person |
- |
- |
750,000.00 |
|
Other Non - current Assets |
30,000.00 |
30,000.00 |
30,000.00 |
|
Total Assets |
9,185,288.85 |
4,457,746.17 |
3,509,420.31 |
LIABILITIES &
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY [BAHT]
|
Current
Liabilities |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Accounts & Other
Payable |
1,801,899.32 |
1,177,579.65 |
1,854,498.62 |
|
Short-term Loan |
- |
1,740,000.00 |
- |
|
Accrued Income Tax |
5,202.26 |
- |
- |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
6,266.40 |
4,575.52 |
10,450.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
1,813,367.98 |
2,922,155.17 |
1,864,949.22 |
|
Long-term Loan |
5,740,000.00 |
- |
- |
|
Total Liabilities |
7,553,367.98 |
2,922,155.17 |
1,864,949.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital : Baht 1,000
par value authorized, issued
and fully paid share
capital 2,000 shares |
2,000,000.00 |
2,000,000.00 |
2,000,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Paid |
2,000,000.00 |
2,000,000.00 |
2,000,000.00 |
|
Retained Earning - Unappropriated |
[368,079.13] |
[464,409.00] |
[355,528.91] |
|
Total Shareholders' Equity |
1,631,920.87 |
1,535,591.00 |
1,644,471.09 |
|
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity |
9,185,288.85 |
4,457,746.17 |
3,509,420.31 |
|
Revenue |
2011 |
2010 |
Feb. 19,
2009 – Dec. 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Income |
7,171,523.68 |
3,850,142.31 |
1,258,623.99 |
|
Other Income |
236,082.00 |
117,433.11 |
25,639.41 |
|
Total Revenues |
7,407,605.68 |
3,967,575.42 |
1,284,263.40 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods
Sold |
5,844,109.16 |
3,060,691.95 |
809,021.53 |
|
Selling Expenses |
377,003.74 |
- |
- |
|
Administrative Expenses |
1,084,960.65 |
980,077.88 |
830,770.78 |
|
Total Expenses |
7,306,073.55 |
4,040,769.83 |
1,639,792.31 |
|
Profit / [Loss] before Income
Tax |
101,532.13 |
[73,194.41] |
[355,528.91] |
|
Income Tax |
[5,202.26] |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit / [Loss] |
96,329.87 |
[73,194.41] |
[355,528.91] |
|
ITEM |
UNIT |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT RATIO |
TIMES |
5.05 |
1.52 |
1.46 |
|
QUICK RATIO |
TIMES |
3.89 |
1.06 |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
- |
- |
- |
|
TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
0.78 |
0.86 |
0.36 |
|
INVENTORY CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
131.35 |
160.24 |
622.33 |
|
INVENTORY TURNOVER |
TIMES |
2.78 |
2.28 |
0.59 |
|
RECEIVABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
356.62 |
288.08 |
199.11 |
|
RECEIVABLES TURNOVER |
TIMES |
1.02 |
1.27 |
1.83 |
|
PAYABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
112.54 |
140.43 |
836.68 |
|
CASH CONVERSION CYCLE |
DAYS |
375.44 |
307.89 |
(15.24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFITABILITY
RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
% |
81.49 |
79.50 |
64.28 |
|
SELLING & ADMINISTRATION |
% |
20.39 |
25.46 |
66.01 |
|
INTEREST |
% |
- |
- |
- |
|
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
21.80 |
23.55 |
37.76 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN BEFORE EX. ITEM |
% |
1.42 |
(1.90) |
(28.25) |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
1.34 |
(1.90) |
(28.25) |
|
RETURN ON EQUITY |
% |
5.90 |
(4.77) |
(21.62) |
|
RETURN ON ASSET |
% |
1.05 |
(1.64) |
(10.13) |
|
EARNING PER SHARE |
BAHT |
48.16 |
(36.60) |
(177.76) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVERAGE RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
DEBT RATIO |
TIMES |
0.82 |
0.66 |
0.53 |
|
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO |
TIMES |
4.63 |
1.90 |
1.13 |
|
TIME INTEREST EARNED |
TIMES |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL GROWTH |
|
|
|
|
|
SALES GROWTH |
% |
86.27 |
205.90 |
|
|
OPERATING PROFIT |
% |
(238.72) |
(79.41) |
|
|
NET PROFIT |
% |
231.61 |
79.41 |
|
|
FIXED ASSETS |
% |
- |
- |
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
% |
106.05 |
27.02 |
|
ANNUAL GROWTH :
SATISFACTORY
An annual sales growth is 86.27%. Turnover has increased from THB
3,850,142.31 in 2010 to THB 7,171,523.68 in 2011. While net profit has
increased from THB -73,194.41 in 2010 to THB 96,329.87 in 2011. And total
assets has increased from THB 4,457,746.17 in 2010 to THB 9,185,288.85 in 2011.
PROFITABILITY :
EXCELLENT

PROFITABILITY
RATIO
|
Gross Profit Margin |
21.80 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
9.66 |
|
Net Profit Margin |
1.34 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
(0.20) |
|
Return on Assets |
1.05 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
(0.27) |
|
Return on Equity |
5.90 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
(0.72) |
Gross Profit Margin used to assess a firm's financial health by revealing
the proportion of money left over from revenues after accounting for the cost
of goods sold. Gross profit margin serves as the source for paying additional
expenses and future savings. The company’s figure is 21.8%. When compared with the industry
average, the ratio of the company was higher, indicated that company was more
profitable than the same industry.
Net Profit Margin is the indicator of the company's efficiency in that
net profit takes into consideration all expenses of the company. A low profit
margin indicates a low margin of safety, higher risk that a decline in sales
will erase profits and result in a net loss. The company’s figure is
1.34%, higher figure when
compared with those of its average competitors in the same industry, indicated
that business was an efficient operator
in a dominant position within its industry.
Return on Assets measures how efficiently profits are being generated
from the assets employed in the business when compared with the ratios of firms
in a similar business. A low ratio in comparison with industry averages
indicates an inefficient use of business assets. Return on Assets ratio is
1.05%, higher figure when compared with those of its average competitors in the
same industry, indicated that business was an efficient profit in a dominant position within its industry.
Return on Equity indicates how profitable a company is by comparing its
net income to its average shareholders' equity, ROE measures how much the
shareholders earned for their investment in the company. Return on Equity ratio
is 5.9%, higher figure when compared with those of its average competitors in
the same industry, indicated that business was an efficient profit in a dominant position within its industry.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Return on Assets Uptrend
Return on Equity Stable
LIQUIDITY :
SATISFACTORY

LIQUIDITY RATIO
|
Current Ratio |
5.05 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
1.72 |
|
Quick Ratio |
3.89 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Conversion Cycle |
375.44 |
|
|
|
The Current Ratio is to ascertain whether a company's short-term assets
are readily available to pay off its short-term liabilities. The company's figure
is 5.05 times in 2011, increased from 1.52 times, then it is generally
considered to have good short-term financial strength. When compared with the
industry average, the ratio of the company was higher, indicated that company
was an efficient operator in a dominant position within its industry.
The Quick Ratio is a liquidity indicator that further refines the
current ratio by measuring the amount of the most liquid current assets there
are to cover current liabilities. The company's figure is 3.89 times in 2011,
increased from 1.06 times, although excluding inventory so the company still
have good short-term financial strength.
The Cash Conversion Cycle measures the number of days a company's cash
is tied up in the production and sales process of its operations and the
benefit from payment terms from its creditors. It meant the company could
survive when no cash inflow was received from sale for 376 days.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Current Ratio Downtrend
LEVERAGE : RISKY


LEVERAGE RATIO
|
Debt Ratio |
0.82 |
Acceptable |
Industrial
Average |
0.60 |
|
Debt to Equity Ratio |
4.63 |
Risky |
Industrial
Average |
1.67 |
|
Times Interest Earned |
- |
|
Industrial
Average |
0.63 |
Debt to Equity Ratio a measurement of how much suppliers, lenders, creditors
and obligors have committed to the company versus what the shareholders have
committed. A lower the percentage means that the company is using less leverage
and has a stronger equity position.
Debt Ratio shows the proportion of a company's assets which are financed
through debt. The company's figure is 0.82 greater than 0.5, most of the
company's assets are financed through debt.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Debt Ratio Uptrend
Times Interest Earned Uptrend
ACTIVITY :
ACCEPTABLE

ACTIVITY RATIO
|
Fixed Assets Turnover |
- |
|
Industrial
Average |
10.73 |
|
Total Assets Turnover |
0.78 |
Acceptable |
Industrial
Average |
1.47 |
|
Inventory Conversion Period |
131.35 |
|
|
|
|
Inventory Turnover |
2.78 |
Impressive |
Industrial
Average |
2.17 |
|
Receivables Conversion Period |
356.62 |
|
|
|
|
Receivables Turnover |
1.02 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial
Average |
3.31 |
|
Payables Conversion Period |
112.54 |
|
|
|
The company's Account Receivable Ratio is calculated as 1.02 and 1.27 in
2011 and 2010 respectively. This ratio measures the efficiency of the company in
managing its trade debtors to generate revenue. A lower ratio may indicate over
extension and collection problems. Conversely, a higher ratio may indicate an
overtly stringent policy. In this case, the company's A/R ratio in 2011
decreased from 2010. This would suggest the company had deteriorated in the
management of its debt collections.
Inventory Turnover in Days Ratio indicates the liquidity of inventory.
It estimates the number of days that it will take to sell the current
inventory. Inventory is particularly sensitive to change in business
activities. The inventory turnover in days has decreased from 160 days at the
end of 2010 to 131 days at the end of 2011. This represents a positive trend.
And Inventory turnover has increased from 2.28 times in year 2010 to 2.78 times
in year 2011.
The company's Total Asset Turnover is calculated as 0.78 times and 0.86
times in 2011 and 2010 respectively. This ratio is determined by dividing total
assets into total sales turnover. The ratio measures the activity of the assets
and the ability of the firm to generate sales through the use of the assets.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Fixed Assets Turnover Uptrend
Total Assets Turnover Downtrend
Inventory Turnover Downtrend
Receivables Turnover Downtrend
DIAMOND INDUSTRY –
INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world
as the birthplace for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of
diamonds but history says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in
India. Diamond production in India can be traced back to almost 8th
Century B.C. India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th
Century when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of
S. Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was
possible only due to combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian
workforce and the untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires,
supported by progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses
derives its importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations
which operate in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business
enterprises include spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction
costs, small, nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage
and philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on
many fronts including higher standard of corporate governance, long-term
performance – focused strategies, modern management and technology.
-
The diamond jewellery industry in India today may be
more than Rs 60000 mil and is rated amongst the fastest growing in the
world. Indi ranks third in the world in domestic diamond consumption.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with
some medium and large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious
import – export, inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In
the process, several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees.
They mostly diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and
capital markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th
October 2010 is as under –
DIAMOND
SAGA – DIRTY DOZEN STUCK WITH 2K CR DEBT
This could be the biggest credibility crisis
the Indian diamond industry has ever faced. Fifteen banks run the risk of
losing Rs 2000 crore lent to a dozen diamond firms in Surat. Until about two
months ago, they had not repaid these dues. Bankers believe many
diamantaires borrowed money during the economic downturn two years ago and
diverted funds to businesses like real estate and capital markets. Many of
themselves made money from these businesses but their diamond companies have
gone sick and declared insolvency.
-
Most of the money borrowed from the banks in the name
of their diamond business has been diverted in real estate and the share
market. The banks are not in a position to seize their properties because in
many cases, these were purchased in the name of their relatives and friends.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.54.39 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.82.32 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.69.54 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Report Prepared
by : |
MNL |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable
factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of
interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with full
security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
---- |
NB |
New Business |
---- |
This score serves as a reference to assess
SC’s credit risk and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is
calculated from a composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major
sections of this report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as
indicated through %) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend (10%) Operational size
(10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.