|
Report Date : |
12.11.2013 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
Eurochoice Traders Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
|
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2011 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
21.12.1992 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
02775689 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Independent |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Diamond Trading. |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
Not Available |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Unknown |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES:
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – March, 31st, 2013
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.12.2012) |
Current Rating (31.03.2013) |
|
|
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
The
|
Source
: CIA |
Eurochoice Traders Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond trading.
|
Industry |
|
|
ANZSIC 2006: |
|
|
ISIC Rev 4: |
|
|
NACE Rev 2: |
|
|
NAICS 2012: |
|
|
|
|
|
US SIC 1987: |
|
Name |
Title |
|
Asher Weinberg |
Secretary |
|
Benjamin Issacharoff |
Director |
|
FYE: 31-Dec-2011 |
USD (mil) |
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Registered No.(
1 - Profit & Loss Item Exchange Rate: USD 1 =
GBP 0.6311738
2 - Balance Sheet Item Exchange Rate:
USD 1 = GBP 0.6190609
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diamond trading.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Main Office Address: |
Annual Return Date: 21 Dec 2012 |
|
Individual Directors |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Name |
Status |
DOB |
Filed Address |
Appointment Date |
Resignation Date |
Summary of Directorships |
|
|
Current |
17 Jul 1964 |
42 Queen Elizabeths Walk, |
02 Apr 1993 |
NA |
Current:5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Directors |
|
There are no corporate directors for this company. |
|
|
|
Individual Secretaries |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Name |
Status |
DOB |
Filed Address |
Appointment Date |
Resignation Date |
Summary of Directorships |
|
|
Current |
02 Aug 1963 |
30A |
02 Apr 1993 |
NA |
Current:8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Secretaries |
|
|
|
There are no corporate secretaries for this company. |
|
|
|
Individual Shareholders |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Name |
Share Details |
Share Type |
# of Shares |
Share Price (GBP) |
Share Value (GBP) |
% of Total Shares |
|
A Weinberg |
1 Ordinary GBP 1.00 |
Ordinary |
1 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
25.00 |
|
B Assacharoff |
1 Ordinary GBP 1.00 |
Ordinary |
1 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
25.00 |
|
Chaya Issacharoff |
1 Ordinary GBP 1.00 |
Ordinary |
1 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
25.00 |
|
Gittel Tova Weinberg |
1 Ordinary GBP 1.00 |
Ordinary |
1 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
25.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Shareholders |
|
|
|
There are no corporate shareholders for this company. |
|
|
|
Financials in: USD (mil) |
|
|
Except for share items
(millions) and per share items (actual units) |
|
|
|
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
31-Dec-2007 |
|
Period Length |
52 Weeks |
52 Weeks |
52 Weeks |
52 Weeks |
52 Weeks |
|
Filed Currency |
GBP |
GBP |
GBP |
GBP |
GBP |
|
Exchange Rate (Period
Average) |
0.623776 |
0.647573 |
0.641508 |
0.545576 |
0.499878 |
|
Consolidated |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Financials in: USD
(mil) |
|
|
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
31-Dec-2007 |
|
Filed Currency |
GBP |
GBP |
GBP |
GBP |
GBP |
|
Exchange Rate |
0.643459 |
0.638712 |
0.619253 |
0.695531 |
0.502361 |
|
Consolidated |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tangible Fixed Assets |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Intangible Assets |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Investments |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
|
Total Fixed Assets |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
|
Total Stocks Work In Progress |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
|
Total Debtors |
3.5 |
3.0 |
3.7 |
3.4 |
5.4 |
|
Cash and Equivalents |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Other Current Assets |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total Current Assets |
4.2 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
6.3 |
|
Total Assets |
4.5 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
6.6 |
|
Trade Creditors |
- |
- |
1.9 |
1.7 |
3.7 |
|
Bank Overdraft |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
Social Security/VAT |
- |
- |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
3.2 |
2.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1.1 |
|
Total Current Liabilities |
3.2 |
2.8 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
5.1 |
|
Group Loans (Long Term Liability) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Director Loans (Long Term Liability) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Hire Purchase (Long Term Liability) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Leasing (Long Term Liability) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total Hire Purchase Loans (Long Term Liability) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Other Long Term Loans |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Accruals/Deferred Income (Long Term Liability) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Other Long Term Liabilities |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total Long Term Liabilities |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Deferred Taxation |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Other Provisions |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total Provisions |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Issued Capital |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Share Premium Accounts |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Revaluation Reserve |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Retained Earnings |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
|
Other Reserves |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Minority Interests (Balance Sheet) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total Shareholders Funds |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
|
Net Worth |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Financials in: USD
(mil) |
|
|
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
31-Dec-2007 |
|
Period Length |
52 Weeks |
52 Weeks |
52 Weeks |
52 Weeks |
52 Weeks |
|
Filed Currency |
GBP |
GBP |
GBP |
GBP |
GBP |
|
Exchange Rate (Period
Average) |
0.623776 |
0.647573 |
0.641508 |
0.545576 |
0.499878 |
|
Consolidated |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financials in: USD
(mil) |
|
|
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
31-Dec-2007 |
|
Period Length |
52 Weeks |
52 Weeks |
52 Weeks |
52 Weeks |
52 Weeks |
|
Filed Currency |
GBP |
GBP |
GBP |
GBP |
GBP |
|
Exchange Rate |
0.643459 |
0.638712 |
0.619253 |
0.695531 |
0.502361 |
|
Consolidated |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Ratio |
1.31 |
1.37 |
1.35 |
1.30 |
1.23 |
|
Liquidity Ratio |
1.30 |
1.36 |
1.34 |
1.17 |
1.09 |
|
Borrowing Ratio |
- |
- |
- |
1,594.00% |
305.00% |
|
Equity Gearing |
2,891.00% |
3,188.00% |
3,049.00% |
2,682.00% |
2,311.00% |
DIAMOND INDUSTRY –
-
From time immemorial,
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was possible only due to
combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian workforce and the untiring
and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires, supported by progressive
Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses derives its
importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations which operate
in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business enterprises include
spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction costs, small,
nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage and philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on many fronts including
higher standard of corporate governance, long-term performance – focused
strategies, modern management and technology.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with some medium and
large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious import – export,
inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In the process,
several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees. They mostly
diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and capital
markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th October 2010 is as
under –
-
Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council in its statistical data has
shown the export of polished diamonds to have increase by 28 % in February
2013. Compared to $ 1.4 bn worth of polished diamond export in February, 2012,
-
The banking sector has started exercising restraint while following
prudent risk management norms when lending money to gems and jewellery sector.
This follows the implementation of Basel III accord – a global voluntary
regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy, stress testing and market liquidity.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.63.30 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.101.36 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.84.60 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Report Prepared
by : |
NIT |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit transaction.
It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest and
principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable
factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of
interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
---- |
NB |
New Business |
---- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk and
to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.