|
Report Date : |
29.11.2013 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
MKS INSTRUMENTS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
Suite 201, 2 Tech Drive Andover, MA 01810 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
United States |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2012 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
1961 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Public Parent |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Subject is engaged in ) is a provider of instruments,
subsystems and process control solutions that measure, control, power,
monitor and analyze parameters of manufacturing processes. |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
2,305 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Status : |
Good |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Regular |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES
:
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – March 31st, 2013
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.12.2012) |
Current Rating (31.03.2013) |
|
United States |
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
UNITED STATES - ECONOMIC
OVERVIEW
The US has the largest and most technologically powerful
economy in the world, with a per capita GDP of $49,800. In this market-oriented
economy, private individuals and business firms make most of the decisions, and
the federal and state governments buy needed goods and services predominantly
in the private marketplace. US business firms enjoy greater flexibility than
their counterparts in Western Europe and Japan in decisions to expand capital
plant, to lay off surplus workers, and to develop new products. At the same
time, they face higher barriers to enter their rivals' home markets than
foreign firms face entering US markets. US firms are at or near the forefront
in technological advances, especially in computers and in medical, aerospace,
and military equipment; their advantage has narrowed since the end of World War
II. The onrush of technology largely explains the gradual development of a
"two-tier labor market" in which those at the bottom lack the
education and the professional/technical skills of those at the top and, more
and more, fail to get comparable pay raises, health insurance coverage, and
other benefits. Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have
gone to the top 20% of households. Since 1996, dividends and capital gains have
grown faster than wages or any other category of after-tax income. Imported oil
accounts for nearly 55% of US consumption. Crude oil prices doubled between
2001 and 2006, the year home prices peaked; higher gasoline prices ate into
consumers' budgets and many individuals fell behind in their mortgage payments.
Oil prices climbed another 50% between 2006 and 2008, and bank foreclosures
more than doubled in the same period. Besides dampening the housing market,
soaring oil prices caused a drop in the value of the dollar and a deterioration in the US merchandise trade deficit, which
peaked at $840 billion in 2008. The sub-prime mortgage crisis, falling home
prices, investment bank failures, tight credit, and the global economic
downturn pushed the United States into a recession by mid-2008. GDP contracted
until the third quarter of 2009, making this the deepest and longest downturn
since the Great Depression. To help stabilize financial markets, in October
2008 the US Congress established a $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program
(TARP). The government used some of these funds to purchase equity in US banks
and industrial corporations, much of which had been returned to the government
by early 2011. In January 2009 the US Congress passed and President Barack OBAMA signed a bill providing an additional $787
billion fiscal stimulus to be used over 10 years - two-thirds on additional
spending and one-third on tax cuts - to create jobs and to help the economy
recover. In 2010 and 2011, the federal budget deficit reached nearly 9% of GDP.
In 2012 the federal government reduced the growth of spending and the deficit
shrank to 7.6% of GDP. Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan required major shifts in
national resources from civilian to military purposes and contributed to the
growth of the budget deficit and public debt. Through 2011, the direct costs of the wars totaled nearly $900 billion, according to
US government figures. US revenues from taxes and other sources are lower, as a
percentage of GDP, than those of most other countries. In March 2010, President
OBAMA signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a health
insurance reform that was designed to extend coverage to an additional 32
million American citizens by 2016, through private health insurance for the
general population and Medicaid for the impoverished. Total spending on health
care - public plus private - rose from 9.0% of GDP in 1980 to 17.9% in 2010. In
July 2010, the president signed the DODD-FRANK Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, a law designed to promote financial stability by protecting
consumers from financial abuses, ending taxpayer bailouts of financial firms,
dealing with troubled banks that are "too big to fail," and improving
accountability and transparency in the financial system - in particular, by
requiring certain financial derivatives to be traded in markets that are
subject to government regulation and oversight. In December 2012, the Federal
Reserve Board announced plans to purchase $85 billion per month of
mortgage-backed and Treasury securities in an effort to hold down long-term
interest rates, and to keep short term rates near zero until unemployment drops
to 6.5% from the December rate of 7.8%, or until inflation rises above 2.5%.
Long-term problems include stagnation of wages for lower-income families,
inadequate investment in deteriorating infrastructure, rapidly rising medical
and pension costs of an aging population, energy shortages, and sizable current
account and budget deficits - including significant budget shortages for state
governments
Source : CIA
|
MKS INSTRUMENTS,
INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MKS Instruments, Inc. (MKS) is a provider of instruments, subsystems and process control solutions that measure, control, power, monitor and analyze parameters of manufacturing processes. It also provides services relating to the maintenance and repair of its products, software maintenance, installation services and training. The primary markets it serves are manufacturers of semiconductor capital equipment and semiconductor devices and for other thin film applications, including flat panel displays, solar cells, light emitting diodes (LEDs), data storage media and other advanced manufactured products. The Company groups its products into three product groups, based upon the similarity of the product function, type of product and manufacturing processes. The three groups of products are: Instruments and Control Systems, Power and Reactive Gas Products and Vacuum Products. In March 2013, it acquired Alter Power Systems S.r.l. For the nine months ended 30 September 2013, MKS Instruments, Inc. revenues decreased 9% to $465M. Net income decreased 65% to $15.5M. Revenues reflect Products decrease of 9% to $389M, Services decrease of 7% to $76M. Net income also reflects Selling, general and administrative increase of 6% to $102.1M (expense), Research and development increase of 3% to $47.3M (expense). |
|
Industry |
|
|
ANZSIC 2006: |
2419 - Other Professional and Scientific Equipment Manufacturing |
|
ISIC Rev 4: |
2651 - Manufacture of measuring, testing, navigating and control equipment |
|
NACE Rev 2: |
2651 - Manufacture of instruments and appliances for measuring, testing and navigation |
|
NAICS 2012: |
|
|
UK SIC 2007: |
2651 - Manufacture of instruments and appliances for measuring, testing and navigation |
|
US SIC 1987: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABI Number: 009012360
1 - Profit & Loss Item Exchange Rate: USD 1 = USD 1
2 - Balance Sheet Item Exchange Rate: USD 1 = USD 1
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ANZSIC 2006 Codes: |
||
|
2419 |
- |
Other Professional and Scientific Equipment Manufacturing |
|
7000 |
- |
Computer System Design and Related Services |
|
2422 |
- |
Communication Equipment Manufacturing |
|
ISIC Rev 4 Codes: |
||
|
2651 |
- |
Manufacture of measuring, testing, navigating and control equipment |
|
2630 |
- |
Manufacture of communication equipment |
|
6202 |
- |
Computer consultancy and computer facilities management activities |
|
NACE Rev 2 Codes: |
||
|
2651 |
- |
Manufacture of instruments and appliances for measuring, testing and navigation |
|
2630 |
- |
Manufacture of communication equipment |
|
6202 |
- |
Computer consultancy activities |
|
NAICS 2012 Codes: |
||
|
334513 |
- |
Instruments and Related Products Manufacturing for Measuring, Displaying, and Controlling Industrial Process Variables |
|
334515 |
- |
Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals |
|
541511 |
- |
Custom Computer Programming Services |
|
334519 |
- |
Other Measuring and Controlling Device Manufacturing |
|
334220 |
- |
Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing |
|
334512 |
- |
Automatic Environmental Control Manufacturing for Residential, Commercial, and Appliance Use |
|
US SIC 1987: |
||
|
3823 |
- |
Industrial Instruments for Measurement, Display, and Control of Process Variables; and Related Products |
|
3825 |
- |
Instruments for Measuring and Testing of Electricity and Electrical Signals |
|
3822 |
- |
Automatic Controls for Regulating Residential and Commercial Environments and Appliances |
|
3663 |
- |
Radio and Television Broadcasting and Communications Equipment |
|
7371 |
- |
Computer Programming Services |
|
3829 |
- |
Measuring and Controlling Devices, Not Elsewhere Classified |
|
UK SIC 2007: |
||
|
2651 |
- |
Manufacture of instruments and appliances for measuring, testing and navigation |
|
26309 |
- |
Manufacture of communication equipment (other than telegraph and telephone apparatus and equipment) |
|
6202 |
- |
Computer consultancy activities |
MKS
Instruments, Inc. (MKS) is a provider of instruments, subsystems and process
control solutions that measure, control, power, monitor and analyze parameters
of manufacturing processes. It also provides services relating to the
maintenance and repair of its products, software maintenance, installation
services and training. The primary markets it serves are manufacturers of
semiconductor capital equipment and semiconductor devices and for other thin
film applications, including flat panel displays, solar cells, light emitting
diodes (LEDs), data storage media and other advanced
manufactured products. The Company groups its products into three product
groups, based upon the similarity of the product function, type of product and
manufacturing processes. The three groups of products are: Instruments and
Control Systems, Power and Reactive Gas Products and Vacuum Products. On August
30, 2012, the Company acquired Plasmart, Inc. of Daejeon, Korea. In March 2013, it acquired Alter Power
Systems S.r.l.
The Company has a range of customers that includes manufacturers of
semiconductor capital equipment and semiconductor devices, thin film capital
equipment used in the manufacture of flat panel displays, LEDs,
solar cells, data storage media and other coating applications; and other
industrial, medical, pharmaceutical manufacturing, energy generation,
environmental monitoring and other advanced manufacturing companies, as well as
university, government and industrial research laboratories. During the year
ended December 31, 2011, approximately 61% of its net sales were to
semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device
manufacturers. During 2011, approximately 39% of its net sales were for other
advanced manufacturing applications. These include, but are not limited to,
thin film processing equipment applications, such as flat panel displays, LEDs, solar cells, data storage media and other thin film
coatings, as well as medical equipment; pharmaceutical manufacturing, energy
generation and environmental monitoring processes; other industrial
manufacturing; and university, government and industrial research laboratories.
Its customers include semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers, such as
Applied Materials, Lam Research, Novellus Systems and
Tokyo Electron.
Instruments and Control Systems
The Instruments and Control Systems product group
includes pressure measurement and control, materials delivery, gas composition
analysis and control and information technology products. Baratron
Pressure Measurement Products are used to measure the pressure of the gases
being distributed upstream of the process chambers, process chamber pressures
and pressures between process chambers, vacuum pumps and exhaust lines.
Automatic Pressure and Vacuum Control Products enable control of process
pressure by electronically actuating valves that control the flow of gases in
and out of the process chamber. Baratron pressure
measurement instruments provide the pressure input to the automatic pressure
control device. Its pressure control products can also accept inputs from other
measurement instruments, enabling the automatic control of gas input or exhaust
based on parameters other than pressure. Each of its materials delivery product
lines combines MKS flow, pressure measurement and control technologies to
provide customers with integrated subsystems and control capabilities.
Flow measurement products include gas and vapor flow measurement products based
upon thermal conductivity, pressure and direct liquid injection technologies.
The flow control products combine the flow measurement device with valve
control elements based upon solenoid, piezo-electric
and piston pump technologies. These products measure and automatically control
the mass flow rate of gases and vapors into the process chamber. Gas
composition analysis instruments are sold to a variety of industries, including
the semiconductor industry. Mass Spectrometry-based Gas Composition Analysis
Instruments are based on quadrupole mass spectrometer
sensors that separate gases based on molecular weight. These sensors include
built-in electronics and are provided with software that analyzes the
composition of background and process gases in the process chamber. These instruments
are provided both as portable laboratory systems and as process gas monitoring
systems used in the diagnosis of semiconductor manufacturing process systems.
Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR)-based gas composition analysis products
provide information about the composition of gases by measuring the absorption
of infra-red light as it passes through the sample being measured. Gas analysis
applications include measuring the compositions of mixtures of reactant gases;
measuring the purity of individual process gases; measuring the composition of
process exhaust gas streams to determine process health, and monitoring gases
to ensure environmental health and safety and monitoring combustion exhausts.
These instruments are provided as portable laboratory systems and as process
gas monitoring systems used in the diagnosis of manufacturing processes. Mass
spectrometry-based and FTIR-based gas monitoring systems can indicate
out-of-bounds conditions, such as the presence of undesirable contaminant gases
and water vapor or out-of-tolerance amounts of specific gases in the process,
which alert operators to diagnose and repair faulty equipment.
The Company designs and manufactures a range of products that allow
semiconductor and other manufacturing customers to control their processes
through computer-controlled automation. These products include digital control
network products, process chamber and system controllers, connectivity products
and data analysis/information products. Digital control network products are
used to connect sensors, actuators and subsystems to the chamber and system
control computers. They support a variety of industry-standard connection
methods, as well as conventional discrete digital and analog signals. Chamber
and system control computers process these signals in real time and allow
customers to manage the process conditions. The Company’s
connectivity products allow information to flow from the process sensors and
subsystems and from the process tool control computer to the factory network.
The Company designs online and off-line software products to analyze data.
Power and Reactive Gas Products
The Company’s Power and Reactive Gas Products group
include power delivery and reactive gas generation products used in semiconductor
and other thin film applications, including solar and in medical imaging
equipment applications. It designs and manufactures microwave, direct current
and radio frequency power delivery systems, as well as radio frequency matching
networks and metrology products. In the semiconductor, thin film and other
market sectors, its power supplies are used to provide energy to various
etching, stripping and deposition processes. The Company’s
power amplifiers are also used in medical imaging equipment. MKS designs and
manufactures reactive gas generation products, which create reactive species. A
reactive species is an atom or molecule in an unstable state, which is used to
facilitate various chemical reactions in processing of thin
films (deposition of films, etching and cleaning of films and surface
modifications). A number of different technologies are used to create reactive
gas, including different plasma technologies and barrier discharge
technologies.
The Company’s reactive gas products include ozone
generators and subsystems used for deposition of insulators onto semiconductor
devices, ozonated water delivery systems for advanced
semiconductor wafer and flat panel display cleaning, microwave plasma based
products for photo resist removal and a line of remote plasma generators, which
provide reactive gases for a range of semiconductor, flat panel and other thin
film process applications. As materials are deposited on wafers, films, or
solar cells, the deposited material also accumulates on the walls of the vacuum
process chamber. Its atomic fluorine generators are used to clean the process
chambers between deposition steps to reduce particulates and contamination
caused by accumulated build up on the chamber walls.
Vacuum Products
The Company’s Vacuum Products group consists of
vacuum technology products, including vacuum containment components, vacuum
gauges, vacuum valves, effluent management subsystems and custom stainless
steel chambers, vessels, pharmaceutical process equipment (BPE) hardware and
housings. The Company offers a range of vacuum instruments consisting of vacuum
measurement sensors and associated power supply and readout units, as well as
transducers where the sensor and electronics are integrated within a single
package. Its indirect gauges use thermal conductivity and ionization gauge
technologies to measure pressure and vacuum levels, and its direct gauges use
the pressure measurement technology of a micro electro-mechanical systems
(MEMS)-based piezo sensor.
The Company’s vacuum valves are used for vacuum
isolation of vacuum lines, load locks, vacuum chambers and pumps for chamber
isolation and vacuum containment. Its vacuum process solutions consist of
vacuum fittings, traps and heated lines that are used downstream from the
semiconductor process chamber to control process effluent gasses by preventing
condensable materials from depositing particles near or back into the process
chamber. The Company’s design and manufacturing
facilities build chambers for material and thin film coating, atomic layer
deposition, lithography and all semiconductor and solar processes. It designs
and builds custom panels, weldments, American Society
of Manufacturing Engineers (ASME) vessels and housings, as well as a range of
components for biopharmaceutical processes.
MKS competes with Hitachi, Horiba, Nor-Cal Products, VAT, Inficon,
Brooks Automation and Advanced Energy.
MKS
Instruments, Inc. (MKS) is a provider of instruments, subsystems and process
control solutions that measure, control, power, monitor and analyze parameters
of manufacturing processes. It also provides services relating to the
maintenance and repair of its products, software maintenance, installation
services and training. The primary markets it serves are manufacturers of
semiconductor capital equipment and semiconductor devices and for other thin
film applications, including flat panel displays, solar cells, light emitting
diodes (LEDs), data storage media and other advanced
manufactured products. The Company groups its products into three product
groups, based upon the similarity of the product function, type of product and
manufacturing processes. The three groups of products are: Instruments and
Control Systems, Power and Reactive Gas Products and Vacuum Products. In March
2013, it acquired Alter Power Systems S.r.l. For the
nine months ended 30 September 2013, MKS Instruments, Inc. revenues decreased
9% to $465M. Net income decreased 65% to $15.5M. Revenues reflect Products
decrease of 9% to $389M, Services decrease of 7% to $76M. Net income also
reflects Selling, general and administrative increase of 6% to $102.1M
(expense), Research and development increase of 3% to $47.3M (expense).
Instruments, Subsystems & Process Control Solutions Mfr
Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing special industry machinery, not elsewhere classified, such as smelting and refining equipment, cement making, clayworking, cotton ginning, glass making, hat making, incandescent lamp making, leather working, paint making, rubber working, cigar and cigarette making, tobacco working, shoe making, and stone working machinery, and industrial sewing machines, and automotive maintenance machinery and equipment
MKS Instruments, Inc. (MKS Instruments) develops and manufactures a range of instruments, subsystems and process control solutions. Its products are used to improve process performance and productivity of advanced processes. The company operates in China, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Singapore, Sweden, Taiwan, the UK and the US. The products cater wide range of markets including, Solar & Energy, Semiconductor, Air and Gas Analysis, Disk Drive/Data Storage, Flat Panel Displays, Manufacturing/industrial markets, Material Processing, and Pharmaceutical & Medical market. The company’s operations are spread across the globe. It has manufacturing facilities are located in China, Germany, Israel, Japan, Mexico, the UK and the US. The International sales account for a significant portion of the net sales of the company. In the second quarter of 2012, the company changed its reporting segments from one to four segments namely, Advanced Manufacturing Capital Equipment, Analytical Solutions Group, Europe Region Sales & Service and Asia Region Sales & Service. MKS Instruments’ The Advanced Manufacturing Capital Equipment segment undertakes the development, production, sales and servicing of instruments and control products, power and reactive gas products, materials delivery products and vacuum products. The company’s Analytical Solutions Group segment focuses in gas composition analysis, information technology products and custom fabrication services. The Europe and Asia region sales and service segments principally resell and service the Advanced Manufacturing Capital Equipment and Analytical Solutions Group products sold into their respective regions.The company’s products are divided into four groups, namely, Instruments and Control Systems, Power and Reactive Gas Products, Vacuum Products, and Analytical Solutions Group Products.. Instruments and Control Systems product group includes pressure measurement and controls products; materials delivery products; gas composition analysis products; control and information technology products. The pressure measurement and control products line consist of products for a variety of pressure ranges and accuracy. The product line includes, Baratron pressure measurement products, and automatic pressure and vacuum control products. The materials delivery product line consists of products for a variety of flow ranges and accuracy; the gas composition analysis products line includes mass spectrometry-based gas composition analysis instruments; fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) based gas composition analysis products; and leak detection products. The control and information technology products line offers digital control network products, process chamber and system controllers; connectivity products and data analysis/information products. For the fiscal year ended December 2012, the Instruments and Control Systems product group reported revenue of $258.52m, representing 40.2% of the company’s total revenue. The Power and Reactive Gas Products group includes, power delivery products and reactive gas generation products. These products are used in semiconductor and other thin film applications and in medical imaging equipment applications. For the fiscal year ended December 2012, the Power and Reactive Gas product group reported revenue of $251.66m, representing 39.1% of the company’s total revenue. The Vacuum Products group includes vacuum gauges, vacuum valves, stainless steel components, process solutions, custom stainless steel hardware and custom manufactured components. For the fiscal year ended December 2012, the Vacuum product group reported revenue of $66.41m, representing 10.3% of the company’s total revenue. The company’s Analytical Solutions Group products include gas composition analysis products, information technology products and custom fabrication services. For the fiscal year ended December 2012, the Analytical Solutions Group products group reported revenue of $66.90m, representing 10.4% of the company’s total revenue. Geographically, the company operates in four regions namely, the US, Japan, Europe, and Asia. For the fiscal year ended 2012, the United States region contributed 50.8% to the company’s total revenue, followed by Asia with 23.2%, Europe with 13.3% and Japan contributed 12.7% of the company’s total revenue. In March 2013, MKS Instruments acquired Alter Power Systems S.r.l. of Reggio Emilia, Italy. It develops advanced microwave power generators, components and systems for industrial microwave heating, microwave plasma coating and semiconductor applications. In August 2012, the company acquired Plasmart, Inc. of Daejeon, Korea. It develops radio frequency (RF) plasma generation and monitoring systems for the semiconductor, flat panel display, AMOLED and solar photovoltaic industries.
MKS Instruments, Inc. (MKS Instruments) is instruments, subsystems and process control solutions provider. Its products measure, control, power, monitor and analyze critical parameters, which improves process performance and productivity of advanced manufacturing processes. The company's products cater to various fields including pressure measurement and control, materials delivery, gas composition analysis, electrostatic charge management, control and information technology, power and reactive gas generation and vacuum technology. The company classifies its product portfolio into three groups, namely, Instruments and Control Systems, Power and Reactive Gas Products and Vacuum Products. It serves capital equipment manufacturers for semiconductor devices and other thin film applications; medical, industrial, and manufacturing companies; government, university and industrial research laboratories. MKS Instruments is headquartered in Andover, Massachusetts, the US.The company reported revenues of (U.S. Dollars) USD 643.51 million during the fiscal year ended December 2012, a decrease of 21.76% from 2011. The operating profit of the company was USD 74.22 million during the fiscal year 2012, a decrease of 59.86% from 2011. The net profit of the company was USD 48.03 million during the fiscal year 2012, a decrease of 62.98% from 2011.
MKS Instruments Inc. is a global provider of instruments subsystems and process control solutions that measure control power monitor and analyze critical parameters of advanced manufacturing processes to improve process performance and productivity. Our products are derived from our core competencies in pressure measurement and control materials delivery gas composition analysis control and information technology power and reactive gas generation and vacuum technology. Our primary served markets are manufacturers of capital equipment for semiconductor devices and for other thin film applications including flat panel displays solar cells light emitting diodes data storage media and other advanced coatings. We also leverage our technology in other markets with advanced manufacturing applications including medical equipment pharmaceutical manufacturing energy generation and environmental monitoring.
MKS Instruments is one of the leading worldwide providers of process control solutions for advanced manufacturing processes, such as semiconductor device manufacturing and thin film manufacturing for flat panel displays, optical storage media, architectural glass and electro-optical products. The company also provides technology for medical imaging equipment. Its instruments, components and subsystems incorporate sophisticated technologies to power, measure, control and monitor complex gas-related semiconductor manufacturing processes. MKS Instruments also offers a wide variety of analog and digital automatic pressure control instruments and valves. The controllers range from simple analog manual tuning units to adaptive digital signal processing systems. MKS Instruments is located in Andover, Mass.
|
Product Code |
Product Description |
|
AUT-MC-PI |
Input/output (I/O) modules |
|
AUT-MV-C |
Sensor system |
|
ENV-AN-G |
Gas analyzers |
|
SOF-CS-C |
Wireless communications PDA controller software - DNpocket(tm) |
|
SOF-MA-P |
Process control software |
|
SUB-CL-B |
Gateway serial connectors |
|
SUB-EM-K |
Gauges |
|
SUB-ES-GE |
DC generators |
|
SUB-ES-GE |
Microwave power generators |
|
SUB-ES-GE |
Electrical/electronic generators |
|
SUB-ES-GE |
Gas generators |
|
SUB-ES-GS |
RF generators |
|
SUB-ME-B |
Valves |
|
SUB-ME-M |
Heating pumps |
|
SUB-ME-O |
Vacuum equipment |
|
SUB-SE-I3 |
I/O Controllers |
|
SUB-TR |
Transducers |
|
TAM-AN-C |
Gas analyzers |
|
TAM-DE |
Gas pressure detectors |
|
TAM-ME-MF |
Thermal mass flow meters |
|
TAM-ME-MP |
Manometers |
|
TAM-ME-MP |
Pressure measuring equipment |
|
TAM-PV-G |
Gas density controllers |
|
TAM-PV-M |
Control valves |
|
TAM-PV-M |
Control systems |
|
TAM-PV-P |
Pressure controllers |
|
TAM-SC-ISF |
Fourier transform infrared spectrometers |
|
TAM-SC-ISM |
Quadruple spectrometers |
|
TAM-SC-LX |
Combustion monitors |
|
TEL-CI-N |
Bus adapters |
|
Financials in: |
USD(mil) |
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
643.5 |
|
Net Income: |
48.0 |
|
Assets: |
1,134.8 |
|
Long Term Debt: |
0.0 |
|
Total Liabilities: |
122.7 |
|
Working Capital: |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Financial Data: |
31-Dec-2012 |
|
Quote Symbol: |
MKSI |
|
Exchange: |
NASDAQ |
|
Currency: |
USD |
|
Stock Price: |
29.7 |
|
Stock Price Date: |
11-08-2013 |
|
52 Week Price Change %: |
29.5 |
|
Market Value (mil): |
1,580,349.0 |
|
|
|
|
SEDOL: |
2404871 |
|
ISIN: |
US55306N1046 |
|
|
|
|
Equity and Dept Distribution: |
|
|
Common Stock no Par, 04/11, 200M auth., 52,264,426 issd. Insiders own 3.21%. IPO 3/30/99, 6.5M shares(6M by the Co.) @ $14 by NationsBanc Montgomery Securities LC. *NOTE: 1/01, Company acquired Applied Science & Technologies, Inc. @ 0.7669 shares (11,107,069 shares issued) |
|
|
Auditor: |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
|
|
|
Auditor: |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
ABI Number: |
009012360 |
|
Key Organizational Changes |
|
|
In September 2011, the
company acquired GE's EO3 line of ozone generators from General Electric.
These generators are used for water/ sterilization for food applications and
bottled beverages for reducing bacteria levels in process water from
pharmaceutical and biotech manufacturing, and for other water treatment applications.
The acquisition of the EO3 product line further expands the ozone product
offering of the company into water treatment for pharmaceutical, industrial
and food and beverage applications. The growth initiatives provide enough
opportunity for the company to increase its business-to-business marketing
through alliance network and channels.Product LaunchesThe new products help the company in enhancing
its revenue and attracting new customers. In July 2012, the company
introduced two new flow control solutions: the P-Series and G-Series
multi-range, multi-gas Mass Flow Controller (MFC) families.
|
|
|
Sales and Distribution |
|
|
A significant portion
of our international net sales were sales in Japan and Korea. We expect that
international net sales will continue to represent a significant percentage
of our total net sales. On August 29, 2012, we completed our acquisition of Plasmart, Inc. located in Daejeon,
Korea. Plasmart develops radio frequency (RF),
plasma generation and monitoring systems for the semiconductor, flat panel
display, active matrix organic light emitting diodes and solar photovoltaic
industries. The purchase price was $22.6 million, net of $0.1 of cash
acquired, after final working capital post close adjustments. |
|
|
Overview
MKS Instruments, Inc. (MKS Instruments) provides instruments, subsystems and process control solutions to improve process performance and productivity of advanced manufacturing processes. The company’s operations are extensively spread across the globe, which enable it to further expand and generate high revenues. The company emphasizes on continuous investment in R&D and thereby introduces new products and solutions to the market. But, the company’s shrinking revenue coupled with dependence on few customers is a serious cause of concern for the company. However, the strategic acquisitions made by the company and the positive outlook for the solar energy sector broadens the growth opportunity for the company. Nevertheless, factors such as intensifying competition from other players in the market; and the rising uncertainties in global economy could adversely affect the company’s business operations.
Strengths
Wider reach in terms of geography would mean reaping more benefits, eventually improving the profit margins, attaining economies of scale and recognition on a worldwide basis. Headquartered in the US, the company has operations across the Europe, Asia and North America. Geographically, the company operates through four regions, namely, United States, Japan, Europe and Asia. For the fiscal year ended 2012, the United States region contributed 50.8% to the company’s total revenue, followed by Asia with 23.2%, Europe with 13.3% and Japan contributed 12.7% of the company’s total revenue. Geographical diversity enables the company mitigate various risks associated with the over dependence on a specific market. It bestows the company with a wide customer base, strong brand presence and growth opportunities across emerging markets. The operations of MKS Instruments are spread across the globe. The company’s manufacturing facilities are located in China, Germany, Israel, Japan, Mexico, the UK and the US. International sales account for a significant portion of the net sales of the company. The company has an opportunity to value for money business model with the cost efficient outsourcing services offered by the emerging countries like China.
Strong liquidity helps the company in meeting its working capital requirements effectively. The company reported an increase in all the liquidity ratios owing to decreased current liabilities, which declined from $96.43m in 2011 to $79.31m in 2012. During the fiscal year ended 2012, the company reported current ratio of 10.94 times as against 9.17 times in 2011, followed by quick ratio of 9.24 times as against 7.58 times, and cash ratio of 7.75 times in 2012 as against 5.86 times in 2011. Growth in current ratio indicates that the company is in a strong position to meet its short-term obligations. The company also reported an increase in its cash and short term investments in fiscal year 2012. The company had $615.24m in cash and short term investments as of December 2012, as compared to cash and short term investments of $565.52m in 2011. Increasing cash reserves indicate the company’s ability to obtain additional debt to finance acquisitions, capture business opportunities and meet capital expenditure or other capital requirements in the future.
MKS Instruments has robust research and development (R&D) capabilities. The R&D activities of the company focus on improving the performance of older products and developing new products. The company has undertaken several projects to enhance and develop its various products, including instruments, components, subsystems and process control solutions to improve process performance and productivity. With strong R&D, the company has developed new products in line with the industry trends, such as the shrinking of integrated circuit critical dimensions to 22 nanometers and below. The semiconductor industry is going through a phase of transition. Some of the changes include shift towards larger substrate sizes that require more advanced process control technology. In order to adapt to the changes in the industry, the company focuses on continuous investment in R&D. In last three years, the company spent $183.84m in research and development activities. In 2012, the company introduced various new products including P-Series and G-Series mass flow controllers and HPQ3/HPQ3S residual gas analyzers. The strong R&D capabilities of the company enable it to implement innovative technology and deliver advance products, solutions and services that meet its customers' critical needs.
Weaknesses
The company generates a significant amount of revenue from a few major companies including semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers such as Applied Materials, Lam Research and Tokyo Electron. For the fiscal year ended December 2012, Applied Materials accounted for approximately 14% of the company's total revenue in 2012. The company's sales to the top ten customers accounted for 42% of the total sales revenue in the fiscal year 2012. Similarly, the company’s sales to top ten customers reported 41% in 2011. The company’s inability to continue to perform services for a number of large existing customers, if not offset by sales to new or other existing customers could have a material adverse effect on its business and operations.
Decreasing Operational Efficiency
MKS Instruments has reported a decrease in operating margins and increasing cost structure in 2012. The company’s revenue reported $643.51m in 2012, indicating a decreased of 21.8% over $822.52m in 2011. It’s operating income decreased by 59.9% from $184.93m in 2011 to $74.22m in 2012. The company’s operating margins drop down to 11.53% in 2012 as compared to 22.48% in 2011. Also, the company’s cash from operating activities reported a decline of 12.1% from $156.04m in 2011 to $137.17m in 2012. On the other hand, the company’s costs such as operating and administrative cost reported an increase over previous year. In 2012, the operating cost of the company increased from 77.51% in 2011 to 88.46% in 2012. Similarly, the company’s administrative cost increased to 19.51% in 2012 as compared to 15.56% in 2011. The company's underperformance could be attributed to a weak competitive position or inferior products and services offering or lack of innovative products and services.
Opportunities
Positive Outlook for Solar PV Market and Solar
CSP
The company could benefit from the rapidly growing solar photovoltaics (PV) market, augmented by various effective supporting policies. According to the Medium-Term Renewable Energy Market Report 2012 published by International Energy Agency, global solar PV generation increased to 65 TWh in 2011 from 4 TWh in 2005. According to its projections from 2011 to 2017, the global solar electricity generation would increase to 279 TWh by 2017. Besides, global solar CSP generation increased to 4 TWh in 2011 from 1 TWh in 2005. According to its projections from 2011 to 2017, the global solar CSP electricity generation would increase to 31 TWh by 2017. Against the backdrop of favorable policy frameworks for the development of the PV market, the global solar PV installed capacity will continue to grow at a CAGR of 20.2% during the forecast period of 2011-2020 to reach 362,842 MW by 2020.
The company expands its operations and increases its customer base with strategic growth initiatives. The acquisitions help the company in expanding its business operations and also help in adding and attracting new customers. In March 2013, MKS Instruments acquired Alter Power Systems S.r.l. of Reggio Emilia, Italy. It develops advanced microwave power generators, components and systems for industrial microwave heating, microwave plasma coating and semiconductor applications. In August 2012, the company acquired Plasmart, Inc. of Daejeon, Korea. It develops radio frequency (RF) plasma generation and monitoring systems for the semiconductor, flat panel display, AMOLED and solar photovoltaic industries. In September 2011, the company acquired GE's EO3 line of ozone generators from General Electric. These generators are used for water/ sterilization for food applications and bottled beverages for reducing bacteria levels in process water from pharmaceutical and biotech manufacturing, and for other water treatment applications. The acquisition of the EO3 product line further expands the ozone product offering of the company into water treatment for pharmaceutical, industrial and food and beverage applications. The growth initiatives provide enough opportunity for the company to increase its business-to-business marketing through alliance network and channels.
The new products help the company in enhancing its revenue and attracting new customers. In July 2012, the company introduced two new flow control solutions: the P-Series and G-Series multi-range, multi-gas Mass Flow Controller (MFC) families. These MFCs feature full digital control architecture for fast response to setpoint over the operable device range. The P-Series MFCs are designed for critical mass flow applications like those required in semiconductor and high end MOCVD applications. In May 2012, the company introduced high pressure, compact HPQ3S and HPQ3 residual gas analyzers (RGAs). These RGAs are robust, sensitive and fast PVD chamber sensors that do not require differential pumping. The HPQ3 and HPQ3S quadrupole monitors offer the highest levels of automation.
Threats
MKS Instruments is subject to federal, state, local and foreign regulations, including environmental regulations and regulations relating to the design and operation of its products. It must ensure that the affected products meet a variety of standards, many of which vary across the countries in which its systems are used. For example, the European Union has published directives specifically relating to power supplies. In addition, the European Union has issued directives relating to regulation of recycling and hazardous substances, which may be applicable to its products, or to which some customers may voluntarily elect to adhere to. In addition, China has adopted, and certain other Asian countries have indicated an intention to adopt similar regulations. The company must comply with any applicable regulation adopted in connection with these types of directives in order to ship affected products into countries that adopt these types of regulations. The company believes that it is in compliance with current applicable regulations, directives and standards and have obtained all necessary permits, approvals and authorizations to conduct its business. However, compliance with future regulations, directives and standards, or customer demands beyond such requirements, could require it to modify or redesign certain systems, make capital expenditures or incur substantial costs. If the company does not comply with current or future regulations, directives and standards: It could be subject to fines; its production could be suspended or it could be prohibited from offering particular system in specified markets.
Vulnerability of Intellectual Property
The concept of Intellectual property benefits any company, providing a financial incentive for the creation. The company’s intellectual property includes $yrights, patents, trademarks, industrial design rights and various trade secrets. The company has to deliberately doctor the protection of its intellectual property rights as it operates in various sensitive businesses. As of December 31, 2012, the company owned 370 US patents, 440 foreign patents and had 116 pending US patent applications that expire at various dates through 2031. The company relies on various current laws to establish and protect its proprietary rights. Though the company escorts its intellectual property rights affectively, the increasing technological developments make it highly difficult. The company’s intellectual property rights could be challenged, invalidated, or infringed by competitors, which may adversely affect the company’s business by hindering its progress.
MKS Instruments operates in a highly competitive market. The company faces intense competition from other companies in the industry driven by rapidly changing technology. The other industry competitive factors include customer relationships, product quality, price, breadth of product line, manufacturing capabilities, and customer service and support. Few of the company’s competitors are large and have fast access to greater financial and other resources than MKS Instruments. In few cases, the company's competitors are smaller, but are well established in specific product niches. MKS Instruments has always threat from possible competitors such as Advanced Energy and Horiba that offer materials delivery products which compete with the company’s product line of mass flow controllers; Inficon that offers products compete with the company’s gas analysis and vacuum measurement products; Nor-Cal Products and VAT that offer products, which compete with its vacuum components; Brooks Automation and Inficon offer products that compete with its vacuum gauging products; and Advanced Energy offers products that compete with the company’s power delivery and reactive gas generator products. Further, as the industry becomes more attractive, new players could also foray in the market and make it more competitive. Rising competition could make it difficult for the company to attract and retain customers and the market share of the company could be severely affected. Intense competition could have negative impact on the company’s operations as any failure to compete effectively on areas such as pricing, services and quality could negatively impact the revenue and overall performance of the company.
|
Company Name |
Company Type |
Location |
Country |
Industry |
Sales |
Employees |
|
Parent |
Andover, MA |
United States |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
643.5 |
2,305 |
|
|
Branch |
Rochester, NY |
United States |
Medical Equipment and Supplies |
99.4 |
370 |
|
|
Unit |
Rochester, NY |
United States |
Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing |
|
350 |
|
|
Unit |
Wilmington, MA |
United States |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
|
300 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Berlin, Berlin |
Germany |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
34.9 |
25 |
|
|
Unit |
Boulder, CO |
United States |
Metal Products Manufacturing |
|
200 |
|
|
Branch |
San Jose, CA |
United States |
Home Furnishings Retail |
56.2 |
188 |
|
|
Branch |
Andover, MA |
United States |
Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing |
49.5 |
188 |
|
|
Branch |
Boulder, CO |
United States |
Medical Equipment and Supplies |
51.8 |
175 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Alameda, CA |
United States |
Electrical Equipment and Appliances Manufacturing |
|
105 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Telford |
United Kingdom |
Miscellaneous Professional Services |
|
75 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
München, Bayern |
Germany |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
|
70 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
München, Bayern |
Germany |
Holding Companies |
|
60 |
|
|
Branch |
Colorado Springs, CO |
United States |
Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing |
13.5 |
50 |
|
|
Branch |
San Jose, CA |
United States |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
12.5 |
50 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Hsin-chu |
Taiwan |
Electrical Equipment and Appliances Manufacturing |
|
50 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Tokyo, Suginami-Ku |
Japan |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
|
40 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Umea |
Sweden |
Computer System Design Services |
7.8 |
37 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Singapore |
Singapore |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
|
30 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Crewe |
United Kingdom |
Petroleum and Natural Gas Extraction |
|
20 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Shanghai |
China |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
|
20 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Crewe |
United Kingdom |
Miscellaneous Personal Services |
|
15 |
|
|
Branch |
Methuen, MA |
United States |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
2.6 |
12 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Hellebaek |
Denmark |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
0.0 |
12 |
|
|
Branch |
Bel Air, MD |
United States |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
2.1 |
9 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
San Jose, CA |
United States |
Computer Programming |
|
9 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Le Bourget, Cedex |
France |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
5.2 |
7 |
|
|
Branch |
Fullerton, CA |
United States |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
0.5 |
2 |
|
|
Branch |
Norristown, PA |
United States |
Rubber and Plastic Product Manufacturing |
0.3 |
1 |
|
|
Subsidiary |
Lod |
Israel |
Nonclassifiable Establishments |
4.6 |
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
Karmiel |
Israel |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
10.5 |
60 |
|
|
Unit |
Methuen, MA |
United States |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
Wilmington, MA |
United States |
Electromedical and Control Instruments Manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
31-Dec-2012 |
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
|
Period Length |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
|
UpdateType/Date |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Restated Normal |
Restated Normal |
|
Filed Currency |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
|
Exchange Rate (Period Average) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Auditor |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
Auditor Opinion |
Unqualified |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
Unqualified with Explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
643.5 |
822.5 |
853.1 |
392.7 |
621.4 |
|
Revenue |
643.5 |
822.5 |
853.1 |
392.7 |
621.4 |
|
Total Revenue |
643.5 |
822.5 |
853.1 |
392.7 |
621.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenue |
374.0 |
447.5 |
474.5 |
262.5 |
373.1 |
|
Cost of Revenue, Total |
374.0 |
447.5 |
474.5 |
262.5 |
373.1 |
|
Gross Profit |
269.5 |
375.0 |
378.6 |
130.2 |
248.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling/General/Administrative Expense |
125.6 |
128.0 |
119.8 |
100.4 |
120.6 |
|
Total Selling/General/Administrative Expenses |
125.6 |
128.0 |
119.8 |
100.4 |
120.6 |
|
Research & Development |
60.1 |
61.0 |
62.7 |
50.2 |
72.8 |
|
Amortization of Intangibles |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
|
Depreciation/Amortization |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
|
Investment Income - Operating |
1.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Interest/Investment Income - Operating |
1.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Interest Expense (Income) - Net Operating Total |
1.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Restructuring Charge |
0.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
|
Litigation |
5.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Impairment-Assets Held for Use |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
143.0 |
0.0 |
|
Impairment-Assets Held for Sale |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.9 |
|
Loss (Gain) on Sale of Assets - Operating |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-0.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Other Unusual Expense (Income) |
1.3 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Unusual Expense (Income) |
6.9 |
0.0 |
-0.7 |
148.5 |
0.9 |
|
Total Operating Expense |
569.3 |
637.6 |
657.6 |
564.4 |
571.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
74.2 |
184.9 |
195.5 |
-171.7 |
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense - Non-Operating |
-0.1 |
0.0 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
-0.6 |
|
Interest Expense, Net Non-Operating |
-0.1 |
0.0 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
-0.6 |
|
Interest Income - Non-Operating |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.7 |
7.0 |
|
Interest/Investment Income - Non-Operating |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.7 |
7.0 |
|
Interest Income (Expense) - Net Non-Operating Total |
0.9 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
1.6 |
6.4 |
|
Income Before Tax |
75.1 |
186.1 |
196.4 |
-170.0 |
56.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Tax |
27.1 |
56.3 |
63.5 |
-20.7 |
16.4 |
|
Income After Tax |
48.0 |
129.7 |
132.9 |
-149.4 |
40.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Before Extraord Items |
48.0 |
129.7 |
132.9 |
-149.4 |
40.0 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
0.0 |
0.0 |
9.7 |
-63.3 |
-9.9 |
|
Total Extraord Items |
0.0 |
0.0 |
9.7 |
-63.3 |
-9.9 |
|
Net Income |
48.0 |
129.7 |
142.6 |
-212.7 |
30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Available to Common Excl Extraord Items |
48.0 |
129.7 |
132.9 |
-149.4 |
40.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Available to Common Incl Extraord Items |
48.0 |
129.7 |
142.6 |
-212.7 |
30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic/Primary Weighted Average Shares |
52.7 |
52.2 |
50.1 |
49.3 |
49.7 |
|
Basic EPS Excl Extraord Items |
0.91 |
2.49 |
2.65 |
-3.03 |
0.80 |
|
Basic/Primary EPS Incl Extraord Items |
0.91 |
2.49 |
2.85 |
-4.31 |
0.61 |
|
Dilution Adjustment |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Diluted Net Income |
48.0 |
129.7 |
142.6 |
-212.7 |
30.1 |
|
Diluted Weighted Average Shares |
53.2 |
52.8 |
50.9 |
49.3 |
50.8 |
|
Diluted EPS Excl Extraord Items |
0.90 |
2.45 |
2.61 |
-3.03 |
0.79 |
|
Diluted EPS Incl Extraord Items |
0.90 |
2.45 |
2.80 |
-4.31 |
0.59 |
|
Dividends per Share - Common Stock Primary Issue |
0.62 |
0.60 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Gross Dividends - Common Stock |
32.7 |
31.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Interest Expense, Supplemental |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
|
Depreciation, Supplemental |
14.4 |
12.0 |
12.3 |
14.4 |
14.5 |
|
Total Special Items |
6.9 |
-2.5 |
-0.7 |
148.5 |
0.9 |
|
Normalized Income Before Tax |
82.1 |
183.5 |
195.7 |
-21.5 |
57.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Special Items on Income Taxes |
2.5 |
-0.8 |
-0.2 |
52.0 |
0.3 |
|
Inc Tax Ex Impact of Sp Items |
29.6 |
55.5 |
63.3 |
31.3 |
16.6 |
|
Normalized Income After Tax |
52.5 |
128.0 |
132.5 |
-52.9 |
40.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normalized Inc. Avail to Com. |
52.5 |
128.0 |
132.5 |
-52.9 |
40.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Normalized EPS |
1.00 |
2.45 |
2.65 |
-1.07 |
0.82 |
|
Diluted Normalized EPS |
0.99 |
2.42 |
2.60 |
-1.07 |
0.80 |
|
Amort of Intangibles, Supplemental |
- |
1.0 |
1.5 |
4.4 |
4.0 |
|
Rental Expenses |
8.2 |
7.7 |
8.3 |
9.0 |
- |
|
Research & Development Exp, Supplemental |
60.1 |
61.0 |
62.7 |
50.2 |
72.8 |
|
Normalized EBIT |
82.7 |
182.4 |
194.8 |
-23.2 |
50.9 |
|
Normalized EBITDA |
97.2 |
195.4 |
208.6 |
-4.4 |
69.4 |
|
Current Tax - Domestic |
10.4 |
25.8 |
27.8 |
-24.6 |
9.5 |
|
Current Tax - Foreign |
12.1 |
20.3 |
22.3 |
7.3 |
11.3 |
|
Current Tax - Local |
0.8 |
2.6 |
3.3 |
-0.2 |
1.5 |
|
Current Tax - Total |
23.3 |
48.8 |
53.4 |
-17.5 |
22.2 |
|
Deferred Tax - Domestic |
2.0 |
7.8 |
10.0 |
-0.4 |
-8.3 |
|
Deferred Tax - Foreign |
1.8 |
-0.2 |
0.1 |
-2.7 |
2.5 |
|
Deferred Tax - Total |
3.8 |
7.5 |
10.1 |
-3.1 |
-5.8 |
|
Income Tax - Total |
27.1 |
56.3 |
63.5 |
-20.7 |
16.4 |
|
Defined Contribution Expense - Domestic |
2.2 |
2.3 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
|
Total Pension Expense |
2.2 |
2.3 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
|
|
|
Annual Balance Sheet |
|
Financials in: USD (mil) |
|
|
31-Dec-2012 |
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
|
UpdateType/Date |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
|
Filed Currency |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
|
Exchange Rate |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Auditor |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
Auditor Opinion |
Unqualified |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
Unqualified with Explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash & Equivalents |
287.6 |
312.9 |
162.5 |
111.0 |
119.3 |
|
Short Term Investments |
327.7 |
252.6 |
269.5 |
160.8 |
159.6 |
|
Cash and Short Term Investments |
615.2 |
565.5 |
431.9 |
271.8 |
278.9 |
|
Accounts Receivable - Trade, Gross |
84.9 |
123.4 |
140.7 |
96.6 |
87.5 |
|
Provision for Doubtful Accounts |
-2.9 |
-2.5 |
-2.6 |
-2.4 |
-2.1 |
|
Trade Accounts Receivable - Net |
82.1 |
120.9 |
138.2 |
94.2 |
85.4 |
|
Other Receivables |
12.8 |
12.0 |
0.0 |
14.5 |
4.1 |
|
Total Receivables, Net |
94.8 |
132.9 |
138.2 |
108.7 |
89.4 |
|
Inventories - Finished Goods |
38.3 |
53.8 |
52.5 |
45.4 |
50.4 |
|
Inventories - Work In Progress |
19.7 |
21.3 |
21.9 |
16.5 |
17.4 |
|
Inventories - Raw Materials |
76.6 |
78.5 |
82.0 |
56.1 |
63.7 |
|
Total Inventory |
134.6 |
153.6 |
156.4 |
118.0 |
131.5 |
|
Prepaid Expenses |
4.3 |
8.5 |
6.6 |
- |
- |
|
Deferred Income Tax - Current Asset |
8.2 |
10.6 |
13.8 |
21.5 |
19.1 |
|
Other Current Assets |
10.9 |
13.7 |
6.0 |
12.9 |
9.9 |
|
Other Current Assets, Total |
19.1 |
24.3 |
19.8 |
34.4 |
28.9 |
|
Total Current Assets |
868.2 |
884.9 |
752.9 |
532.9 |
528.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
86.8 |
83.6 |
82.0 |
82.8 |
81.9 |
|
Land/Improvements |
9.2 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
9.1 |
12.3 |
|
Machinery/Equipment |
166.7 |
155.8 |
148.5 |
145.0 |
141.8 |
|
Construction in Progress |
9.2 |
7.1 |
4.0 |
1.4 |
5.5 |
|
Property/Plant/Equipment - Gross |
272.0 |
254.6 |
242.6 |
238.3 |
241.5 |
|
Accumulated Depreciation |
-191.4 |
-182.1 |
-173.7 |
-171.1 |
-159.5 |
|
Property/Plant/Equipment - Net |
80.5 |
72.5 |
69.0 |
67.2 |
82.0 |
|
Goodwill, Net |
150.7 |
140.1 |
140.0 |
144.5 |
337.8 |
|
Intangibles - Gross |
122.3 |
110.7 |
110.4 |
140.4 |
146.5 |
|
Accumulated Intangible Amortization |
-110.7 |
-109.7 |
-108.7 |
-135.4 |
-125.4 |
|
Intangibles, Net |
11.6 |
1.0 |
1.7 |
5.0 |
21.1 |
|
LT Investments - Other |
12.2 |
7.9 |
0.0 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
|
Long Term Investments |
12.2 |
7.9 |
0.0 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
|
Deferred Income Tax - Long Term Asset |
9.5 |
10.3 |
15.1 |
17.4 |
12.7 |
|
Other Long Term Assets |
2.2 |
2.0 |
3.7 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
|
Other Long Term Assets, Total |
11.7 |
12.3 |
18.8 |
19.7 |
15.4 |
|
Total Assets |
1,134.8 |
1,118.7 |
982.4 |
774.1 |
984.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable |
16.8 |
24.9 |
36.4 |
26.3 |
19.3 |
|
Accrued Expenses |
21.0 |
50.5 |
62.9 |
28.0 |
33.3 |
|
Notes Payable/Short Term Debt |
0.0 |
1.9 |
0.0 |
12.9 |
17.8 |
|
Current Portion - Long Term Debt/Capital Leases |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.9 |
|
Customer Advances |
9.3 |
11.6 |
5.0 |
4.1 |
4.6 |
|
Income Taxes Payable |
4.1 |
7.5 |
5.3 |
- |
- |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
28.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Other Current liabilities, Total |
41.6 |
19.1 |
10.3 |
4.1 |
4.6 |
|
Total Current Liabilities |
79.3 |
96.4 |
109.7 |
71.3 |
75.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.4 |
|
Total Long Term Debt |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
|
Total Debt |
0.0 |
1.9 |
0.0 |
12.9 |
19.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long Term Liabilities |
43.4 |
32.2 |
25.7 |
17.8 |
21.9 |
|
Other Liabilities, Total |
43.4 |
32.2 |
25.7 |
17.8 |
21.9 |
|
Total Liabilities |
122.7 |
128.6 |
135.4 |
89.1 |
98.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock - Non Redeemable |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Preferred Stock - Non Redeemable, Net |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Common Stock |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Common Stock |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Additional Paid-In Capital |
718.0 |
707.4 |
663.8 |
645.4 |
637.9 |
|
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) |
278.6 |
268.9 |
171.4 |
28.8 |
241.4 |
|
Other Comprehensive Income |
15.5 |
13.6 |
11.8 |
10.6 |
7.2 |
|
Other Equity, Total |
15.5 |
13.6 |
11.8 |
10.6 |
7.2 |
|
Total Equity |
1,012.2 |
990.0 |
847.0 |
684.9 |
886.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Shareholders’ Equity |
1,134.8 |
1,118.7 |
982.4 |
774.1 |
984.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding - Common Stock Primary Issue |
52.7 |
52.5 |
50.6 |
49.5 |
49.3 |
|
Total Common Shares Outstanding |
52.7 |
52.5 |
50.6 |
49.5 |
49.3 |
|
Treasury Shares - Common Stock Primary Issue |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Employees |
2,305 |
2,429 |
2,673 |
2,178 |
2,631 |
|
Number of Common Shareholders |
138 |
147 |
159 |
184 |
572 |
|
Accumulated Intangible Amort, Suppl. |
110.7 |
109.7 |
108.7 |
135.4 |
125.4 |
|
Deferred Revenue - Current |
9.3 |
11.6 |
5.0 |
4.1 |
4.6 |
|
Total Long Term Debt, Supplemental |
- |
- |
- |
5.0 |
- |
|
Long Term Debt Matur. in Year 6 & Beyond |
- |
- |
- |
5.0 |
- |
|
Total Operating Leases, Supplemental |
26.5 |
28.7 |
29.2 |
30.1 |
38.2 |
|
Operating Lease Payments Due in Year 1 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.4 |
7.8 |
8.7 |
|
Operating Lease Payments Due in Year 2 |
5.7 |
5.8 |
6.6 |
6.0 |
7.6 |
|
Operating Lease Payments Due in Year 3 |
4.0 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
|
Operating Lease Payments Due in Year 4 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.2 |
4.5 |
|
Operating Lease Payments Due in Year 5 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
4.1 |
|
Operating Lease Pymts. Due in 2-3 Years |
9.7 |
10.6 |
11.8 |
11.2 |
12.8 |
|
Operating Lease Pymts. Due in 4-5 Years |
5.9 |
6.6 |
6.2 |
5.9 |
8.6 |
|
Oper. Lse. Pymts. Due in Year 6 & Beyond |
3.3 |
4.0 |
3.7 |
5.2 |
8.1 |
|
Accrued Liabilities - Domestic |
-16.4 |
-12.9 |
-12.2 |
-8.8 |
-7.8 |
|
Net Assets Recognized on Balance Sheet |
-16.4 |
-12.9 |
-12.2 |
-8.8 |
-7.8 |
|
Annual Cash Flows |
|
Financials in: USD (mil) |
|
|
31-Dec-2012 |
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
|
Period Length |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
|
UpdateType/Date |
Updated Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
|
Filed Currency |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
|
Exchange Rate (Period Average) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Auditor |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
Auditor Opinion |
Unqualified |
Unqualified with Explanation |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
Unqualified with Explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income/Starting Line |
48.0 |
129.7 |
142.6 |
-212.7 |
30.1 |
|
Depreciation |
14.4 |
13.0 |
13.8 |
18.8 |
23.5 |
|
Depreciation/Depletion |
14.4 |
13.0 |
13.8 |
18.8 |
23.5 |
|
Deferred Taxes |
3.8 |
7.5 |
10.1 |
-3.1 |
-5.8 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-4.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Unusual Items |
- |
- |
- |
208.5 |
6.1 |
|
Other Non-Cash Items |
26.9 |
21.3 |
21.2 |
30.1 |
27.7 |
|
Non-Cash Items |
26.9 |
21.3 |
16.7 |
238.6 |
33.8 |
|
Accounts Receivable |
38.3 |
17.9 |
-42.5 |
-9.9 |
23.6 |
|
Inventories |
5.3 |
-11.7 |
-52.5 |
-4.7 |
7.1 |
|
Other Assets |
7.7 |
-7.7 |
0.3 |
2.5 |
-3.7 |
|
Accounts Payable |
-8.3 |
-11.6 |
11.2 |
6.1 |
-9.2 |
|
Accrued Expenses |
4.1 |
2.9 |
40.9 |
-10.8 |
-4.4 |
|
Taxes Payable |
-3.1 |
-5.3 |
22.8 |
-19.9 |
-2.2 |
|
Changes in Working Capital |
44.0 |
-15.5 |
-19.8 |
-36.7 |
11.2 |
|
Cash from Operating Activities |
137.2 |
156.0 |
163.5 |
4.9 |
92.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Fixed Assets |
-17.7 |
-15.6 |
-15.8 |
-4.2 |
-13.5 |
|
Capital Expenditures |
-17.7 |
-15.6 |
-15.8 |
-4.2 |
-13.5 |
|
Acquisition of Business |
-22.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
|
Sale of Fixed Assets |
0.1 |
0.0 |
2.3 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
|
Sale/Maturity of Investment |
359.9 |
485.7 |
306.5 |
248.1 |
263.7 |
|
Purchase of Investments |
-436.0 |
-475.8 |
-410.6 |
-254.1 |
-324.4 |
|
Other Investing Cash Flow |
-1.5 |
-0.4 |
11.9 |
0.3 |
-0.3 |
|
Other Investing Cash Flow Items, Total |
-100.2 |
9.5 |
-89.8 |
-5.4 |
-60.6 |
|
Cash from Investing Activities |
-117.9 |
-6.1 |
-105.6 |
-9.6 |
-74.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financing Cash Flow |
2.1 |
5.3 |
2.1 |
-1.0 |
0.3 |
|
Financing Cash Flow Items |
2.1 |
5.3 |
2.1 |
-1.0 |
0.3 |
|
Cash Dividends Paid - Common |
-32.7 |
-31.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
|
Total Cash Dividends Paid |
-32.7 |
-31.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
|
Repurchase/Retirement of Common |
-11.5 |
-2.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-115.7 |
|
Common Stock, Net |
-11.5 |
-2.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-115.7 |
|
Options Exercised |
1.6 |
28.5 |
6.5 |
-0.1 |
8.9 |
|
Issuance (Retirement) of Stock, Net |
-9.9 |
26.5 |
6.5 |
-0.1 |
-106.9 |
|
Short Term Debt Issued |
2.9 |
41.8 |
119.2 |
162.4 |
155.9 |
|
Short Term Debt Reduction |
-9.3 |
-39.9 |
-132.9 |
-166.8 |
-160.8 |
|
Short Term Debt, Net |
-6.5 |
1.9 |
-13.7 |
-4.5 |
-4.8 |
|
Long Term Debt Reduction |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
-6.3 |
|
Long Term Debt, Net |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
-6.3 |
|
Issuance (Retirement) of Debt, Net |
-6.5 |
1.9 |
-13.7 |
-4.5 |
-11.2 |
|
Cash from Financing Activities |
-47.0 |
2.4 |
-5.0 |
-5.6 |
-117.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Effects |
2.3 |
-1.9 |
-1.4 |
2.0 |
-5.6 |
|
Net Change in Cash |
-25.3 |
150.4 |
51.5 |
-8.3 |
-104.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash - Beginning Balance |
312.9 |
162.5 |
111.0 |
119.3 |
224.0 |
|
Net Cash - Ending Balance |
287.6 |
312.9 |
162.5 |
111.0 |
119.3 |
|
Cash Interest Paid |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
|
Cash Taxes Paid |
18.0 |
52.6 |
47.4 |
10.0 |
11.6 |
|
|
31-Dec-2012 |
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
|
Period Length |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
|
UpdateType/Date |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Restated Normal |
Restated Normal |
|
Filed Currency |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
|
Exchange Rate (Period Average) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Auditor |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
Auditor Opinion |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
536.8 |
719.0 |
763.5 |
325.0 |
537.8 |
|
Services |
106.7 |
103.5 |
89.7 |
67.7 |
83.6 |
|
Total Revenue |
643.5 |
822.5 |
853.1 |
392.7 |
621.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/Loss on Derivatives - Hedging |
1.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
other Selling and General |
125.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Cost of products |
310.5 |
387.4 |
421.8 |
219.8 |
319.5 |
|
Cost of services |
63.5 |
60.1 |
52.7 |
42.7 |
53.7 |
|
Research and development |
60.1 |
61.0 |
62.7 |
50.2 |
72.8 |
|
Selling/Gen./Admin. |
- |
128.0 |
119.8 |
100.4 |
120.6 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible asse |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
|
Gain on sale of asset |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-0.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Goodwill Impairment |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
143.0 |
0.0 |
|
Restructuring |
0.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
|
Impairment of investments |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.9 |
|
Completed acquisition costs |
1.3 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Litigation |
5.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total Operating Expense |
569.3 |
637.6 |
657.6 |
564.4 |
571.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
-0.1 |
0.0 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
-0.6 |
|
Interest Income |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.7 |
7.0 |
|
Net Income Before Taxes |
75.1 |
186.1 |
196.4 |
-170.0 |
56.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
27.1 |
56.3 |
63.5 |
-20.7 |
16.4 |
|
Net Income After Taxes |
48.0 |
129.7 |
132.9 |
-149.4 |
40.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Before Extra. Items |
48.0 |
129.7 |
132.9 |
-149.4 |
40.0 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net |
0.0 |
0.0 |
9.7 |
-63.3 |
-9.9 |
|
Net Income |
48.0 |
129.7 |
142.6 |
-212.7 |
30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Available to Com Excl ExtraOrd |
48.0 |
129.7 |
132.9 |
-149.4 |
40.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Available to Com Incl ExtraOrd |
48.0 |
129.7 |
142.6 |
-212.7 |
30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Weighted Average Shares |
52.7 |
52.2 |
50.1 |
49.3 |
49.7 |
|
Basic EPS Excluding ExtraOrdinary Items |
0.91 |
2.49 |
2.65 |
-3.03 |
0.80 |
|
Basic EPS Including ExtraOrdinary Items |
0.91 |
2.49 |
2.85 |
-4.31 |
0.61 |
|
Dilution Adjustment |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Diluted Net Income |
48.0 |
129.7 |
142.6 |
-212.7 |
30.1 |
|
Diluted Weighted Average Shares |
53.2 |
52.8 |
50.9 |
49.3 |
50.8 |
|
Diluted EPS Excluding ExtraOrd Items |
0.90 |
2.45 |
2.61 |
-3.03 |
0.79 |
|
Diluted EPS Including ExtraOrd Items |
0.90 |
2.45 |
2.80 |
-4.31 |
0.59 |
|
DPS-Ordinary Shares |
0.62 |
0.60 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Gross Dividends - Common Stock |
32.7 |
31.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Normalized Income Before Taxes |
82.1 |
183.5 |
195.7 |
-21.5 |
57.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc Tax Ex Impact of Sp Items |
29.6 |
55.5 |
63.3 |
31.3 |
16.6 |
|
Normalized Income After Taxes |
52.5 |
128.0 |
132.5 |
-52.9 |
40.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normalized Inc. Avail to Com. |
52.5 |
128.0 |
132.5 |
-52.9 |
40.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Normalized EPS |
1.00 |
2.45 |
2.65 |
-1.07 |
0.82 |
|
Diluted Normalized EPS |
0.99 |
2.42 |
2.60 |
-1.07 |
0.80 |
|
Research and development |
60.1 |
61.0 |
62.7 |
50.2 |
72.8 |
|
Interest Expense |
0.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Interest Expense |
- |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
|
Rental Expense |
8.2 |
7.7 |
8.3 |
9.0 |
- |
|
Amortization of Intangibles |
- |
1.0 |
1.5 |
4.4 |
4.0 |
|
BC - Depreciation of Fixed Assets |
14.4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Depreciation |
- |
12.0 |
12.3 |
14.4 |
14.5 |
|
Federal |
10.4 |
25.8 |
27.8 |
-24.6 |
9.5 |
|
State |
0.8 |
2.6 |
3.3 |
-0.2 |
1.5 |
|
Foreign |
12.1 |
20.3 |
22.3 |
7.3 |
11.3 |
|
Current Tax - Total |
23.3 |
48.8 |
53.4 |
-17.5 |
22.2 |
|
Federal |
2.0 |
7.8 |
10.0 |
-0.4 |
-8.3 |
|
State |
1.8 |
-0.2 |
0.1 |
-2.7 |
2.5 |
|
Deferred Tax - Total |
3.8 |
7.5 |
10.1 |
-3.1 |
-5.8 |
|
Income Tax - Total |
27.1 |
56.3 |
63.5 |
-20.7 |
16.4 |
|
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan |
2.2 |
2.3 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
|
Total Pension Expense |
2.2 |
2.3 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
|
|
|
Annual Balance Sheet |
|
Financials in: USD (mil) |
|
|
31-Dec-2012 |
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
|
UpdateType/Date |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Updated Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
|
Filed Currency |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
|
Exchange Rate |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Auditor |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
Auditor Opinion |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
287.6 |
312.9 |
162.5 |
111.0 |
119.3 |
|
Short-term investments |
327.7 |
252.6 |
269.5 |
160.8 |
159.6 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, Gross |
84.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Accounts Rcvbl. |
- |
123.4 |
140.7 |
96.6 |
87.5 |
|
Doubtful Rcvbls. |
-2.9 |
-2.5 |
-2.6 |
-2.4 |
-2.1 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
- |
- |
0.0 |
14.5 |
4.1 |
|
Raw Materials. |
76.6 |
78.5 |
82.0 |
56.1 |
63.7 |
|
Work in Progress |
19.7 |
21.3 |
21.9 |
16.5 |
17.4 |
|
Finished Goods |
38.3 |
53.8 |
52.5 |
45.4 |
50.4 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
8.2 |
10.6 |
13.8 |
21.5 |
19.1 |
|
Income tax receivable |
12.8 |
12.0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
4.3 |
8.5 |
6.6 |
- |
- |
|
Other current assets |
- |
13.7 |
6.0 |
12.9 |
9.9 |
|
Forward exchange contracts- Hedging |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Other Other current assets. |
10.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total Current Assets |
868.2 |
884.9 |
752.9 |
532.9 |
528.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
9.2 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
9.1 |
12.3 |
|
Buildings |
68.8 |
65.0 |
63.6 |
64.8 |
65.9 |
|
Machinery/Equip. |
115.0 |
107.3 |
97.9 |
92.1 |
90.2 |
|
Furn./Fixtures |
51.7 |
48.5 |
50.6 |
52.8 |
51.6 |
|
Leasehold Imrov. |
18.0 |
18.6 |
18.4 |
18.1 |
16.0 |
|
Cons. in Progres |
9.2 |
7.1 |
4.0 |
1.4 |
5.5 |
|
Depreciation |
-191.4 |
-182.1 |
-173.7 |
-171.1 |
-159.5 |
|
Completed technology |
82.1 |
76.8 |
76.8 |
88.9 |
93.2 |
|
Customer relationships |
14.6 |
9.2 |
8.9 |
21.9 |
23.5 |
|
Patents, Prop. Tech. & Other Acq. Intan. |
25.0 |
24.7 |
24.6 |
29.7 |
29.7 |
|
Acc Amort Other Intangibles |
-77.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Acc Amort Other Intangibles |
-8.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
AccAmort Brand/Patent/Market/Art Intang. |
-24.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Accumulated Intangible Amortization |
- |
-109.7 |
-108.7 |
-135.4 |
-125.4 |
|
Goodwill |
150.7 |
140.1 |
140.0 |
144.5 |
337.8 |
|
Deferred Taxes |
9.5 |
10.3 |
15.1 |
17.4 |
12.7 |
|
Other Other assets |
2.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Other assets |
- |
2.0 |
3.7 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
|
Long-term investments |
12.2 |
7.9 |
0.0 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
|
Foreign currency Translation |
0.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total Assets |
1,134.8 |
1,118.7 |
982.4 |
774.1 |
984.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
0.0 |
1.9 |
0.0 |
12.9 |
17.8 |
|
Cur.Port.Leases |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.9 |
|
Accounts Payable |
16.8 |
24.9 |
36.4 |
26.3 |
19.3 |
|
Accrued compensation |
21.0 |
21.8 |
29.9 |
10.7 |
13.8 |
|
Income taxes payable |
4.1 |
7.5 |
5.3 |
- |
- |
|
Deferred revenue |
9.3 |
11.6 |
5.0 |
4.1 |
4.6 |
|
Other current liabilities |
- |
28.8 |
33.0 |
17.4 |
19.5 |
|
Forward exchange contracts - Hedging |
1.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Other Other current liabilities |
26.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total Current Liabilities |
79.3 |
96.4 |
109.7 |
71.3 |
75.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of capital lease oblig |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.4 |
|
Total Long Term Debt |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LT Accrued Expenses |
18.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Other Other liabilities |
3.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Income tax payable |
20.9 |
16.1 |
13.7 |
6.8 |
11.8 |
|
Other liabilities |
- |
16.1 |
12.0 |
11.1 |
10.2 |
|
Total Liabilities |
122.7 |
128.6 |
135.4 |
89.1 |
98.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, 2,000, |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Common Stock, no par value, 200,000,000 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
718.0 |
707.4 |
663.8 |
645.4 |
637.9 |
|
Retained Earnings |
278.6 |
268.9 |
171.4 |
28.8 |
241.4 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
- |
13.6 |
11.8 |
10.6 |
7.2 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
15.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total Equity |
1,012.2 |
990.0 |
847.0 |
684.9 |
886.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity |
1,134.8 |
1,118.7 |
982.4 |
774.1 |
984.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S/O-Ordinary Shares |
52.7 |
52.5 |
50.6 |
49.5 |
49.3 |
|
Total Common Shares Outstanding |
52.7 |
52.5 |
50.6 |
49.5 |
49.3 |
|
T/S-Ordinary Shares |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Deferred revenue |
9.3 |
11.6 |
5.0 |
4.1 |
4.6 |
|
Acc Amort Other Intangibles |
77.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Acc Amort Other Intangibles |
8.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
AccAmort Brand/Patent/Market/Art Intang. |
24.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Accumulated Intangible Amortization |
- |
109.7 |
108.7 |
135.4 |
125.4 |
|
Full-Time Employees |
2,305 |
2,429 |
2,673 |
2,178 |
2,631 |
|
Number of Common Shareholders |
138 |
147 |
159 |
184 |
572 |
|
Long Term Debt , Remaining Maturities |
- |
- |
- |
5.0 |
- |
|
Total Long Term Debt, Supplemental |
- |
- |
- |
5.0 |
- |
|
Operating Lease Maturing Within 1 Year |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.4 |
7.8 |
8.7 |
|
Operating Lease Maturing Within 2 Years |
5.7 |
5.8 |
6.6 |
6.0 |
7.6 |
|
Operating Lease Maturing Within 3 Years |
4.0 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
|
Operating Lease Maturing Within 4 Years |
3.0 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.2 |
4.5 |
|
Operating Lease Maturing Within 5 Years |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
4.1 |
|
Operating Lease , Remaining Maturities |
3.3 |
4.0 |
3.7 |
5.2 |
8.1 |
|
Total Operating Leases, Supplemental |
26.5 |
28.7 |
29.2 |
30.1 |
38.2 |
|
Liability - Supplemental Retirement |
-16.4 |
-12.9 |
-12.2 |
-8.8 |
-7.8 |
|
Net Assets Recognized on Balance Sheet |
-16.4 |
-12.9 |
-12.2 |
-8.8 |
-7.8 |
|
Annual Cash Flows |
|
Financials in: USD (mil) |
|
|
31-Dec-2012 |
31-Dec-2011 |
31-Dec-2010 |
31-Dec-2009 |
31-Dec-2008 |
|
Period Length |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
12 Months |
|
UpdateType/Date |
Updated Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
Reclassified Normal |
|
Filed Currency |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
USD |
|
Exchange Rate (Period Average) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Auditor |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
Auditor Opinion |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
Unqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
48.0 |
129.7 |
142.6 |
-212.7 |
30.1 |
|
Depreciation |
14.4 |
13.0 |
13.8 |
18.8 |
23.5 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
13.0 |
11.2 |
10.6 |
8.8 |
15.3 |
|
Provision for excess and obsolete invent |
15.0 |
14.9 |
13.2 |
20.3 |
11.4 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
- |
- |
- |
193.3 |
0.0 |
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
- |
- |
- |
15.2 |
6.1 |
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operati |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-4.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
3.8 |
7.5 |
10.1 |
-3.1 |
-5.8 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based com |
-2.1 |
-5.3 |
-2.1 |
0.0 |
-0.3 |
|
Other |
0.9 |
0.6 |
-0.6 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
|
Trade accounts receivable |
38.3 |
17.9 |
-42.5 |
-9.9 |
23.6 |
|
Inventories |
5.3 |
-11.7 |
-52.5 |
-4.7 |
7.1 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
-3.1 |
-5.3 |
22.8 |
-19.9 |
-2.2 |
|
Other Current Assets |
7.7 |
-7.7 |
0.3 |
2.5 |
-3.7 |
|
Accrued compensation and other liabiliti |
4.1 |
2.9 |
40.9 |
-10.8 |
-4.4 |
|
Accounts Payable |
-8.3 |
-11.6 |
11.2 |
6.1 |
-9.2 |
|
Cash from Operating Activities |
137.2 |
156.0 |
163.5 |
4.9 |
92.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash acq |
-22.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
|
Purchases of investments |
-436.0 |
-475.8 |
-410.6 |
-254.1 |
-324.4 |
|
Sales of investments |
46.6 |
100.1 |
117.7 |
- |
- |
|
Maturities of investments |
313.3 |
385.6 |
188.8 |
248.1 |
263.7 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipme |
-17.7 |
-15.6 |
-15.8 |
-4.2 |
-13.5 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets |
0.1 |
0.0 |
2.3 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
|
Net proceeds from sale of discontinued o |
0.0 |
0.0 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Other |
-1.5 |
-0.4 |
-3.7 |
0.3 |
-0.3 |
|
Cash from Investing Activities |
-117.9 |
-6.1 |
-105.6 |
-9.6 |
-74.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term borrowings |
2.9 |
41.8 |
119.2 |
162.4 |
155.9 |
|
Payments on short-term borrowings |
-9.3 |
-39.9 |
-132.9 |
-166.8 |
-160.8 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
-11.5 |
-2.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-115.7 |
|
Net proceeds related to employee stock a |
1.6 |
28.5 |
6.5 |
-0.1 |
8.9 |
|
Dividend payments |
-32.7 |
-31.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
|
LT Debt Repayments |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
-5.0 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based comp |
2.1 |
5.3 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
|
Others |
- |
- |
- |
-1.0 |
- |
|
Capital Leases, Repayment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-1.3 |
|
Cash from Financing Activities |
-47.0 |
2.4 |
-5.0 |
-5.6 |
-117.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Effects |
2.3 |
-1.9 |
-1.4 |
2.0 |
-5.6 |
|
Net Change in Cash |
-25.3 |
150.4 |
51.5 |
-8.3 |
-104.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash - Beginning Balance |
312.9 |
162.5 |
111.0 |
119.3 |
224.0 |
|
Net Cash - Ending Balance |
287.6 |
312.9 |
162.5 |
111.0 |
119.3 |
|
Cash Interest Paid |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
|
Cash Taxes Paid |
18.0 |
52.6 |
47.4 |
10.0 |
11.6 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standard & Poor’s
|
United
States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' Due To Political Risks,
Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative |
|
Publication
date: 05-Aug-2011 20:13:14 EST |
·
We have lowered our long-term sovereign
credit rating on the United States of America to 'AA+' from 'AAA' and affirmed
the 'A-1+' short-term rating.
·
We have also removed both the short- and long-term ratings
from CreditWatch negative.
·
The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that
Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our
view, would be necessary to stabilize the government's medium-term debt
dynamics.
·
More broadly, the downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability,
and predictability of American policymaking and political institutions have
weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic challenges to a degree more
than we envisioned when we assigned a negative outlook to the rating on April
18, 2011.
·
Since then, we have changed our view of the difficulties in bridging the
gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us
pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to
leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan
that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics any time soon.
·
The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. We could lower the
long-term rating to 'AA' within the next two years if we see that less
reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, or new fiscal
pressures during the period result in a higher general government debt
trajectory than we currently assume in our base case.
TORONTO (Standard &
Poor's) Aug. 5, 2011--Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said today that it
lowered its long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America
to 'AA+' from 'AAA'. Standard & Poor's also said that the outlook on the
long-term rating is negative. At the same time, Standard & Poor's affirmed
its 'A-1+' short-term rating on the U.S. In addition, Standard & Poor's
removed both ratings from CreditWatch, where they
were placed on July 14, 2011, with negative implications.
The transfer and
convertibility (T&C) assessment of the U.S.--our assessment of the
likelihood of official interference in the ability of U.S.-based public- and
private-sector issuers to secure foreign exchange for
debt
service--remains 'AAA'.
We lowered our long-term
rating on the U.S. because we believe that the prolonged controversy over
raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate
indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public
spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an agreement on raising
revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a
contentious and fitful process. We also believe that the fiscal consolidation
plan that Congress and the Administration agreed to this week falls short of
the amount that we believe is necessary to stabilize the general government
debt burden by the middle of the decade.
Our lowering of the
rating was prompted by our view on the rising public debt burden and our perception of greater policymaking uncertainty, consistent with our
criteria (see "Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and
Assumptions ," June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41).
Nevertheless, we view the U.S. federal government's other economic, external,
and monetary credit attributes, which form the basis for the sovereign rating,
as broadly unchanged.
We have taken the ratings
off CreditWatch because the Aug. 2 passage of the
Budget Control Act Amendment of 2011 has removed any perceived immediate threat
of payment default posed by delays to raising the government's debt ceiling. In
addition, we believe that the act provides sufficient clarity to allow us to
evaluate the likely course of U.S. fiscal policy for the next few years.
The political
brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America's governance
and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable
than what we previously believed. The statutory debt ceiling and the threat of
default have become political bargaining chips in the debate over fiscal
policy. Despite this year's wide-ranging debate, in our view, the differences
between political parties have proven to be extraordinarily difficult to
bridge, and, as we see it, the resulting agreement fell well short of the
comprehensive fiscal consolidation program that some proponents had envisaged
until quite recently. Republicans and Democrats have only been able to agree to
relatively modest savings on discretionary spending while delegating to the
Select Committee decisions on more comprehensive measures. It appears that for
now, new revenues have dropped down on the menu of policy options. In addition,
the plan envisions only minor policy changes on Medicare and little change in
other entitlements,
the
containment of which we and most other independent observers regard as key to
long-term fiscal sustainability.
Our opinion is that
elected officials remain wary of tackling the structural issues required to
effectively address the rising U.S. public debt burden in a manner consistent
with a 'AAA' rating and with 'AAA' rated sovereign peers (see Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and
Assumptions," June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41). In
our view, the difficulty in framing a consensus on fiscal policy weakens the
government's ability to manage public finances and diverts attention from the
debate over how to achieve more balanced and dynamic economic growth in an era
of fiscal stringency and private-sector deleveraging
(ibid). A new political consensus might (or might not) emerge after the 2012
elections, but we believe that by then, the government debt burden will likely
be higher, the needed medium-term fiscal adjustment potentially greater, and
the inflection point on the U.S. population's demographics and other
age-related spending drivers closer at hand (see "Global Aging 2011: In The U.S., Going Gray Will Likely
Cost Even More Green, Now," June 21, 2011).
Standard & Poor's
takes no position on the mix of spending and revenue measures that Congress and
the Administration might conclude is appropriate for putting the U.S.'s
finances on a sustainable footing.
The act calls for as much
as $2.4 trillion of reductions in expenditure growth over the 10 years through
2021. These cuts will be implemented in two steps: the $917 billion agreed to
initially, followed by an additional $1.5 trillion that the newly formed
Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction is supposed to
recommend by November 2011. The act contains no measures to raise taxes or
otherwise enhance revenues, though the committee could recommend them.
The act further provides
that if Congress does not enact the committee's recommendations, cuts of $1.2
trillion will be implemented over the same time period. The reductions would
mainly affect outlays for civilian discretionary spending, defense, and
Medicare. We understand that this fall-back mechanism is designed to encourage
Congress to embrace a more balanced mix of expenditure savings, as the
committee might recommend.
We note that in a letter
to Congress on Aug. 1, 2011, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated
total budgetary savings under the act to be at least $2.1 trillion over the
next 10 years relative to its baseline assumptions. In updating our own fiscal
projections, with certain modifications outlined below, we have relied on the CBO's latest "Alternate Fiscal Scenario" of June
2011, updated to include the CBO assumptions contained in its Aug. 1 letter to
Congress. In general, the CBO's "Alternate
Fiscal Scenario" assumes a continuation of recent Congressional action
overriding existing law.
We view the act's
measures as a step toward fiscal consolidation. However, this is within the
framework of a legislative mechanism that leaves open the details of what is
finally agreed to until the end of 2011, and Congress and the Administration
could modify any agreement in the future. Even assuming that at least $2.1
trillion of the spending reductions the act envisages are implemented, we
maintain our view that the U.S. net general government debt burden (all levels
of government combined, excluding liquid financial assets) will likely continue
to grow. Under our revised base case fiscal scenario--which we consider to be
consistent with a 'AA+' long-term rating and a negative outlook--we now project
that net general government debt would rise from an estimated 74% of GDP by the
end of 2011 to 79% in 2015 and 85% by 2021. Even the projected 2015 ratio of
sovereign indebtedness is high in relation to those of peer credits and, as
noted, would continue to rise under the act's revised policy settings.
Compared with previous
projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003
tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed
our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue
to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress
reinforced by passing the act. Key macroeconomic assumptions in the base case
scenario include trend real GDP growth of 3% and consumer price inflation near
2% annually over the decade.
Our revised upside
scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as consistent with the
outlook on the 'AA+' long-term rating being revised to stable--retains these
same macroeconomic assumptions. In addition, it incorporates $950 billion of
new revenues on the assumption that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high earners
lapse from 2013 onwards, as the Administration is advocating. In this scenario,
we project that the net general government debt would rise from an estimated
74% of GDP by the end of 2011 to 77% in 2015 and to 78% by 2021.
Our revised downside
scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as being consistent with a
possible further downgrade to a 'AA' long-term rating--features less-favorable
macroeconomic assumptions, as outlined below and also assumes that the second
round of spending cuts (at least $1.2 trillion) that the act calls for does not
occur. This scenario also assumes somewhat higher nominal interest rates for
U.S. Treasuries. We still believe that the role of the U.S. dollar as the key
reserve currency confers a government funding advantage, one that could change
only slowly over time, and that Fed policy might lean toward continued loose
monetary policy at a time of fiscal tightening. Nonetheless, it is possible
that interest rates could rise if investors re-price relative risks. As a
result, our alternate scenario factors in a 50 basis point (bp)-75
bp rise in 10-year bond yields relative to the base
and upside cases from 2013 onwards. In this scenario, we project the net public
debt burden would rise from 74% of GDP in 2011 to 90% in 2015 and to 101% by
2021.
Our revised scenarios
also take into account the significant negative revisions to historical GDP
data that the Bureau of Economic Analysis announced on July 29. From our
perspective, the effect of these revisions underscores two related points when
evaluating the likely debt trajectory of the U.S. government. First, the
revisions show that the recent recession was deeper than previously assumed, so
the GDP this year is lower than previously thought in both nominal and real
terms. Consequently, the debt burden is slightly higher. Second, the revised
data highlight the sub-par path of the current economic recovery when compared
with rebounds following previous post-war recessions. We believe the sluggish
pace of the current economic recovery could be consistent with the experiences
of countries that have had financial crises in which the slow process of debt deleveraging in the private sector leads to a persistent
drag on demand. As a result, our downside case scenario assumes relatively
modest real trend GDP growth of 2.5% and inflation of near 1.5% annually going
forward.
When comparing the U.S.
to sovereigns with 'AAA' long-term ratings that we view as relevant
peers--Canada, France, Germany, and the U.K.--we also observe, based on our
base case scenarios for each, that the trajectory of the U.S.'s net public debt
is diverging from the others. Including the U.S., we estimate that these five
sovereigns will have net general government debt to GDP ratios this year
ranging from 34% (Canada) to 80% (the U.K.), with the U.S. debt burden at 74%.
By 2015, we project that their net public debt to GDP ratios will range between
30% (lowest, Canada) and 83% (highest, France), with the U.S. debt burden at
79%. However, in contrast with the U.S., we project that the net public debt
burdens of these other sovereigns will begin to decline, either before or by 2015.
Standard & Poor's
transfer T&C assessment of the U.S. remains 'AAA'. Our T&C assessment
reflects our view of the likelihood of the sovereign restricting other public
and private issuers' access to foreign exchange needed to meet debt service. Although
in our view the credit standing of the U.S. government has deteriorated
modestly, we see little indication that official interference of this kind is
entering onto the policy agenda of either Congress or the Administration.
Consequently, we continue to view this risk as being highly remote.
The outlook on the
long-term rating is negative. As our downside alternate fiscal scenario
illustrates, a higher public debt trajectory than we currently assume could
lead us to lower the long-term rating again. On the other hand, as our upside
scenario highlights, if the recommendations of the Congressional Joint Select
Committee on Deficit Reduction--independently or coupled with other
initiatives, such as the lapsing of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high earners--lead
to fiscal consolidation measures beyond the minimum mandated, and we believe
they are likely to slow the deterioration of the government's debt dynamics,
the long-term rating could stabilize at 'AA+'.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.62.39 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.101.80 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.84.75 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Report
Prepared by : |
NIS |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit transaction.
It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest and
principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect.
Satisfactory capability for payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall
operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with full
security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk and
to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.