|
Report Date : |
24.10.2013 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
TORAY INDUSTRIES INC |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
25F, |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.03.2013 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
12.01.1926 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Public Parent |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Subject operates in seven business segments. The Textile segment
manufactures, processes and sells textile and apparel products. The Plastic
and Chemical segment offers plastic, films and chemical products. The
Information Communication Materials and Equipment segment offers plastic,
films, copy materials, color filters for liquid crystal and optical fibers.
The Carbon Fiber Composite Material segment manufactures and sells carbon
fibers and carbon fiber composite materials. The Environment and Engineering
segment offers functional film and machines, as well as materials for
housing, construction and civil works. This segment is also engaged in real
estate, engineering and precision machine manufacturing businesses. The Life
Science segment manufactures and sells medical, pharmaceutical and optical
products. The Others segment provides various services. |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
42,584 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRAs Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Status : |
Good |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Regular |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES:
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List March, 31st, 2013
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.12.2012) |
Current Rating (31.03.2013) |
|
|
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
In the years following World War II, government-industry cooperation,
a strong work ethic, mastery of high technology, and a comparatively small
defense allocation (1% of GDP) helped
|
Source
: CIA |