|
Report Date : |
23.04.2014 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
REXNORD INDUSTRIES, LLC |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
4701 W. Greenfield Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53214 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
United States |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
05.08.1988 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
LLC |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Designs, manufactures, and markets process and motion control, and
water management products. |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
7,300 (for the group) |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
No complaints |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – March 31, 2014
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.12.2013) |
Current Rating (31.03.2014) |
|
United States |
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low Risk |
A2 |
|
Moderately Low Risk |
B1 |
|
Moderate Risk |
B2 |
|
Moderately High Risk |
C1 |
|
High Risk |
C2 |
|
Very High Risk |
D |
UNITED STATES - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
The US has the largest and most
technologically powerful economy in the world, with a per capita GDP of
$49,800. In this market-oriented economy, private individuals and business
firms make most of the decisions, and the federal and state governments buy
needed goods and services predominantly in the private marketplace. US business
firms enjoy greater flexibility than their counterparts in Western Europe and
Japan in decisions to expand capital plant, to lay off surplus workers, and to
develop new products. At the same time, they face higher barriers to enter
their rivals' home markets than foreign firms face entering US markets. US
firms are at or near the forefront in technological advances, especially in
computers and in medical, aerospace, and military equipment; their advantage has
narrowed since the end of World War II. The onrush of technology largely
explains the gradual development of a "two-tier labor market" in
which those at the bottom lack the education and the professional/technical
skills of those at the top and, more and more, fail to get comparable pay
raises, health insurance coverage, and other benefits. Since 1975, practically
all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households. Since
1996, dividends and capital gains have grown faster than wages or any other
category of after-tax income. Imported oil accounts for nearly 55% of US
consumption. Crude oil prices doubled between 2001 and 2006, the year home
prices peaked; higher gasoline prices ate into consumers' budgets and many
individuals fell behind in their mortgage payments. Oil prices climbed another
50% between 2006 and 2008, and bank foreclosures more than doubled in the same
period. Besides dampening the housing market, soaring oil prices caused a drop
in the value of the dollar and a deterioration in the US merchandise trade
deficit, which peaked at $840 billion in 2008. The sub-prime mortgage crisis,
falling home prices, investment bank failures, tight credit, and the global
economic downturn pushed the United States into a recession by mid-2008. GDP
contracted until the third quarter of 2009, making this the deepest and longest
downturn since the Great Depression. To help stabilize financial markets, in
October 2008 the US Congress established a $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief
Program (TARP). The government used some of these funds to purchase equity in
US banks and industrial corporations, much of which had been returned to the
government by early 2011. In January 2009 the US Congress passed and President Barack OBAMA signed a bill providing an additional $787
billion fiscal stimulus to be used over 10 years - two-thirds on additional
spending and one-third on tax cuts - to create jobs and to help the economy
recover. In 2010 and 2011, the federal budget deficit reached nearly 9% of GDP.
In 2012 the federal government reduced the growth of spending and the deficit
shrank to 7.6% of GDP. Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan required major shifts in
national resources from civilian to military purposes and contributed to the
growth of the budget deficit and public debt. Through 2011, the direct costs of
the wars totaled nearly $900 billion, according to US government figures. US
revenues from taxes and other sources are lower, as a percentage of GDP, than
those of most other countries. In March 2010, President OBAMA signed into law
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a health insurance reform that
was designed to extend coverage to an additional 32 million American citizens
by 2016, through private health insurance for the general population and
Medicaid for the impoverished. Total spending on health care - public plus
private - rose from 9.0% of GDP in 1980 to 17.9% in 2010. In July 2010, the
president signed the DODD-FRANK Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act,
a law designed to promote financial stability by protecting consumers from
financial abuses, ending taxpayer bailouts of financial firms, dealing with
troubled banks that are "too big to fail," and improving
accountability and transparency in the financial system - in particular, by
requiring certain financial derivatives to be traded in markets that are
subject to government regulation and oversight. In December 2012, the Federal
Reserve Board (Fed) announced plans to purchase $85 billion per month of
mortgage-backed and Treasury securities in an effort to hold down long-term
interest rates, and to keep short term rates near zero until unemployment drops
below 6.5% or inflation rises above 2.5%. In late 2013, the Fed announced that
it would begin scaling back long-term bond purchases to $75 billion per month
in January 2014 and reduce them further as conditions warranted; the Fed,
however, would keep short-term rates near zero so long as unemployment and
inflation had not crossed the previously stated thresholds. Long-term problems
include stagnation of wages for lower-income families, inadequate investment in
deteriorating infrastructure, rapidly rising medical and pension costs of an
aging population, energy shortages, and sizable current account and budget
deficits.
|
Source
: CIA |
Your order on: REXNORD
INDUSTRIES, INC.
REXNORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
was incorporated on August 5, 1988, and transformed into REXNORD INDUSTRIES,
LLC on June 30, 2006.
Company name: REXNORD INDUSTRIES, LLC
Address:
Telephone: +1
414-643-3000
Fax: +1 414-643-3078
Website: www.rexnord.com
Corporate ID#: 2168721
State: Delaware
Judicial form: LLC
Date incorporated: August
5, 1988
Stock Value: A
LLC has no stock.
Name of manager: Todd
A. ADAMS
History:
REXNORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
was incorporated on August 5, 1988, and transformed into REXNORD INDUSTRIES,
LLC on June 30, 2006.
Business:
Rexnord Industries, LLC designs, manufactures, and
markets process and motion control, and water management products. Its process
and motion control products include engineered mechanical system components,
such as industrial bearings, couplings, gears, modular conveyor belting
products, and industrial chains. The company also provides water management
products that provide and enhance water quality, safety, flow control, and
conservation for external agencies, engineering and design firms,
municipalities, and owners.
In addition, it offers steel castings, remanufactured gear drives, and
service parts; field, installation assistance, and gearbox repair services; and
technical services, including confidential testing, analysis, and engineering
services. The company serves aerospace, construction, energy, food and
beverage, hydropower, manufacturing, mining, municipal waterwork,
petrochemical, and wind energy industries worldwide.
The Company exports worldwide.
Rexnord Industries, LLC operates as a subsidiary of
Rexnord Corp.
Last news:
03-20-2014
Rexnord Industries, LLC may sell all or part of
itself.
Late in February 2014, Bloomberg reported that Rexnord
is reviewing strategic options. Goldman Sachs was reportedly hired to review
options for enhancing shareholder value. Todd Adams, Chief Executive Officer,
in a brief address during a fiscal third quarter conference call with analysts
said, "I wouldn't read the strategic review as an indictment on how we
feel we're performing today or where we're headed. It's more or less just the
fiduciary responsibility the board’s undertaking. That's really it".
Suppliers include:
TIEN YUEN MACHINERY MFG. CO., LTD.
188, Wu Chuan West Road, Sec. 3, Taichung,
Taiwan
EIN: 04-3722228
Staff: 7,300 (for the group)
Operations & branches:
At the headquarters, we
find the corporate office of the group.
The Company maintains
several branches in the U.S.
Shareholders:
REXNORD CORP.
4701 W. Greenfield Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53214
Rexnord Corp. designs, manufactures, markets, and
services process and motion control, and water management products worldwide.
The Company is listed with
the NYSE under symbol RXN.
Management:
Todd A. ADAMS is the President and CEO
Mr. Todd A. Adams serves as the Chief Executive Officer and President at
Rexnord Industries, LLC. Mr. Adams has been the Chief
Executive Officer and President of RBS Global Inc. and Rexnord
Holdings, Inc. since September 11, 2009 and its subsidiary Rexnord
LLC since September 14, 2009.
He served as the Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Rexnord Holdings, Inc., from April 2008 to September 2009
and served as its Principal Accounting Officer. Mr. Adams joined Rexnord Holdings, Inc. in 2004 as Vice President, Treasurer
and Director of Financial Reporting.
Prior to Rexnord, he served as Director of
Financial Planning and Analysis at The Boeing Company from February 2003 to
July 2004, Vice President and Controller of APW Ltd. from July 2000 to February
2003 and Vice President & Controller of Actuant
Corporation (formerly known as Applied Power Inc.) from May 1998 to July 2000.
Mr. Adams served as Acting President of Water Management Group since May 1,
2009. He served as the Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Rexnord LLC, from April 1, 2008 to September 2009 and also
served as its Principal Accounting Officer. He served as Controller and
Treasurer of Rexnord LLC since July 2004. He served
as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of RBS Global, Inc. since
April 1, 2008 and its Controller and Treasurer since July 2004. Mr. Adams
served as Vice President of RBS Global, Inc. since July 2004 and also as
Principal Accounting Officer. He served as Vice President of Rexnord LLC from July 2004 to April 2008. He has been
Director of RBS Global Inc. since October 2009.
He has been Director of Rexnord Holdings, Inc.
and Rexnord LLC since October 2009. He is a Certified
Public Accountant. Mr. Adams holds a BS in Finance from Eastern Illinois
University.
Michael A. SHPIRO is Vice President and CFO.
Subsidiaries
And partnership: None
In United States, privately
held corporations are not required to publish any financials.
On a direct call, a
financial assistant controlled the present report and confirmed that all
financials are consolidated into the parant company
which reported sales for fiscal year ending March 2013 up to USD 2,005,100,000=
and a net profit of USD 50,100,000=
Banks: Wells Faro Bank
Legal filings & complaints:
As of today date, there is no legal filing pending with the Courts.
State: Indiana
Case number: 1:13-cv-00683-TWP-MJD
Plaintiff: Damond P. STEPP
Defendant: REXNORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Tanya Walton Pratt, presiding
Mark J. Dinsmore, referral
Date filed: 04/24/2013
Date of last update: 04/03/2014
Secured debts summary (UCC): 12
UCC files listed including:
Case number: 13000478524
Date filed: 01-09-2013
Lapse date: 01-09-2018
Secured Party: Cargill
Incorporated
15407 McGinty Road
West, Wayzata, MN 55391
Case number: 120015410516
Date filed: 12-04-2012
Lapse date: 12-04-2017
Secured Party: Cargill
Incorporated
15407 McGinty
Road West, Wayzata, MN 55391
Case number: 120008439832
Date filed: 06-21-2012
Lapse date: 06-21-2017
Secured Party: Toolmex Corporation
1075 Worcester Street, Natick, MA 01760
Case number: 090004279527
Date filed: 04-08-2009
Lapse date: 04-08-2014
Secured Party: P&H
Mining Equipment Inc.
4400 W. National Avenue, Milwaukee, MN 53201
Trade references:
Date reported: March 2014
High credit: USD 40,000
Now owing: 0
Past due: 0
Last purchase: February 2013
Line of business: Office supply
Paying status: 6 days beyond terms
Date reported: March 2014
High credit: USD 300,000+
Now owing: 0
Past due: 0
Last purchase: February 2013
Line of business: Payroll
Paying status: As
agreed
Date reported: March 2014
High credit: USD 12,000
Now owing: 0
Past due: 0
Last purchase: February 2013
Line of business: Telecommunications
Paying status: 8 days beyond terms
Domestic credit history:
Domestic credit history
appears as follow:
Monthly Payment Trends - Recent Activity
|
Date |
Up to 30 DBT |
31-60 DBT |
61-90 DBT |
>90 DBT |
||
|
11/13 |
$1,197,600 |
68% |
25% |
6% |
1% |
0% |
|
12/13 |
$1,051,200 |
76% |
16% |
6% |
2% |
0% |
|
01/14 |
$847,100 |
76% |
13% |
9% |
2% |
0% |
|
02/14 |
$995,900 |
78% |
12% |
8% |
2% |
0% |
|
03/14 |
$954,700 |
76% |
16% |
6% |
2% |
0% |
|
04/14 |
$880,900 |
87% |
7% |
5% |
0% |
1% |
National Credit Bureaus
gave a medium credit rating.
According to our credit analysts, during the last 6 months, payments
were made with an average of 5 to 10 days beyond terms.
International credit history:
Payments of imports are currently made with an average of 2 to 5 days
beyond terms.
Other comments:
The Company maintains a
regular business.
The Company is in good
standing.
This means that all local
and federal taxes were paid on due date.
The risk is medium/low.
Our opinion:
A business connection may
be conducted.
Standard & Poor’s
|
United
States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' Due To Political Risks,
Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative |
|
Publication
date: 05-Aug-2011 20:13:14 EST |
·
We have lowered our long-term sovereign credit rating on the United
States of America to 'AA+' from 'AAA' and affirmed the 'A-1+' short-term
rating.
·
We have also removed both the short- and long-term ratings
from CreditWatch negative.
·
The downgrade reflects our opinion
that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration
recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to
stabilize the government's medium-term debt dynamics.
·
More broadly, the downgrade
reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of
American policymaking and political institutions have weakened at a time of
ongoing fiscal and economic challenges to a degree more than we envisioned when
we assigned a negative outlook to the rating on April 18, 2011.
·
Since then, we have changed our
view of the difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties
over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress
and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a
broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt
dynamics any time soon.
·
The outlook on the long-term rating
is negative. We could lower the long-term rating to 'AA' within the next two
years if we see that less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest
rates, or new fiscal pressures during the period result in a higher general
government debt trajectory than we currently assume in our base case.
TORONTO (Standard &
Poor's) Aug. 5, 2011--Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said today that it
lowered its long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America
to 'AA+' from 'AAA'. Standard & Poor's also said that the outlook on the
long-term rating is negative. At the same time, Standard & Poor's affirmed
its 'A-1+' short-term rating on the U.S. In addition, Standard & Poor's
removed both ratings from CreditWatch, where they
were placed on July 14, 2011, with negative implications.
The
transfer and convertibility (T&C) assessment of the U.S.--our assessment of
the likelihood of official interference in the ability of U.S.-based public-
and private-sector issuers to secure foreign exchange for
debt service--remains
'AAA'.
We lowered our long-term
rating on the U.S. because we believe that the prolonged controversy over
raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate
indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public
spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an agreement on raising
revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a
contentious and fitful process. We also believe that the fiscal consolidation
plan that Congress and the Administration agreed to this week falls short of
the amount that we believe is necessary to stabilize the general government
debt burden by the middle of the decade.
Our lowering of the
rating was prompted by our view on the rising public debt burden and our
perception of greater policymaking uncertainty, consistent with our criteria
(see "Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and Assumptions
," June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41). Nevertheless, we view the U.S.
federal government's other economic, external, and monetary credit attributes,
which form the basis for the sovereign rating, as broadly unchanged.
We have taken the ratings
off CreditWatch because the Aug. 2 passage of the
Budget Control Act Amendment of 2011 has removed any perceived immediate threat
of payment default posed by delays to raising the government's debt ceiling. In
addition, we believe that the act provides sufficient clarity to allow us to
evaluate the likely course of U.S. fiscal policy for the next few years.
The
political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America's
governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less
predictable than what we previously believed. The statutory debt ceiling and
the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in the debate over
fiscal policy. Despite this year's wide-ranging debate, in our view, the
differences between political parties have proven to be extraordinarily
difficult to bridge, and, as we see it, the resulting agreement fell well short
of the comprehensive fiscal consolidation program that some proponents had
envisaged until quite recently. Republicans and Democrats have only been able
to agree to relatively modest savings on discretionary spending while
delegating to the Select Committee decisions on more comprehensive measures. It
appears that for now, new revenues have dropped down on the menu of policy
options. In addition, the plan envisions only minor policy changes on Medicare and
little change in other entitlements,
the containment of which
we and most other independent observers regard as key to long-term fiscal
sustainability.
Our opinion is that
elected officials remain wary of tackling the structural issues required to effectively
address the rising U.S. public debt burden in a manner consistent with a 'AAA'
rating and with 'AAA' rated sovereign peers (see Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and Assumptions,"
June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41). In our view, the difficulty in
framing a consensus on fiscal policy weakens the government's ability to manage
public finances and diverts attention from the debate over how to achieve more
balanced and dynamic economic growth in an era of fiscal stringency and
private-sector deleveraging (ibid). A new political
consensus might (or might not) emerge after the 2012 elections, but we believe
that by then, the government debt burden will likely be higher, the needed
medium-term fiscal adjustment potentially greater, and the inflection point on
the U.S. population's demographics and other age-related spending drivers
closer at hand (see "Global Aging 2011: In The U.S., Going Gray Will Likely Cost Even
More Green, Now," June 21, 2011).
Standard & Poor's
takes no position on the mix of spending and revenue measures that Congress and
the Administration might conclude is appropriate for putting the U.S.'s
finances on a sustainable footing.
The act calls for as much
as $2.4 trillion of reductions in expenditure growth over the 10 years through
2021. These cuts will be implemented in two steps: the $917 billion agreed to
initially, followed by an additional $1.5 trillion that the newly formed
Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction is supposed to
recommend by November 2011. The act contains no measures to raise taxes or
otherwise enhance revenues, though the committee could recommend them.
The act further provides
that if Congress does not enact the committee's recommendations, cuts of $1.2
trillion will be implemented over the same time period. The reductions would mainly
affect outlays for civilian discretionary spending, defense, and Medicare. We
understand that this fall-back mechanism is designed to encourage Congress to
embrace a more balanced mix of expenditure savings, as the committee might
recommend.
We note that in a letter
to Congress on Aug. 1, 2011, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated
total budgetary savings under the act to be at least $2.1 trillion over the
next 10 years relative to its baseline assumptions. In updating our own fiscal
projections, with certain modifications outlined below, we have relied on the CBO's latest "Alternate Fiscal Scenario" of June
2011, updated to include the CBO assumptions contained in its Aug. 1 letter to
Congress. In general, the CBO's "Alternate
Fiscal Scenario" assumes a continuation of recent Congressional action
overriding existing law.
We view the act's
measures as a step toward fiscal consolidation. However, this is within the
framework of a legislative mechanism that leaves open the details of what is finally
agreed to until the end of 2011, and Congress and the Administration could
modify any agreement in the future. Even assuming that at least $2.1 trillion
of the spending reductions the act envisages are implemented, we maintain our
view that the U.S. net general government debt burden (all levels of government
combined, excluding liquid financial assets) will likely continue to grow.
Under our revised base case fiscal scenario--which we consider to be consistent
with a 'AA+' long-term rating and a negative outlook--we now project that net
general government debt would rise from an estimated 74% of GDP by the end of
2011 to 79% in 2015 and 85% by 2021. Even the projected 2015 ratio of sovereign
indebtedness is high in relation to those of peer credits and, as noted, would
continue to rise under the act's revised policy settings.
Compared with previous
projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003
tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed
our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue
to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress
reinforced by passing the act. Key macroeconomic assumptions in the base case
scenario include trend real GDP growth of 3% and consumer price inflation near
2% annually over the decade.
Our revised upside
scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as consistent with the
outlook on the 'AA+' long-term rating being revised to stable--retains these
same macroeconomic assumptions. In addition, it incorporates $950 billion of
new revenues on the assumption that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high earners
lapse from 2013 onwards, as the Administration is advocating. In this scenario,
we project that the net general government debt would rise from an estimated
74% of GDP by the end of 2011 to 77% in 2015 and to 78% by 2021.
Our revised downside
scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as being consistent with a
possible further downgrade to a 'AA' long-term rating--features less-favorable
macroeconomic assumptions, as outlined below and also assumes that the second
round of spending cuts (at least $1.2 trillion) that the act calls for does not
occur. This scenario also assumes somewhat higher nominal interest rates for
U.S. Treasuries. We still believe that the role of the U.S. dollar as the key
reserve currency confers a government funding advantage, one that could change
only slowly over time, and that Fed policy might lean toward continued loose
monetary policy at a time of fiscal tightening. Nonetheless, it is possible
that interest rates could rise if investors re-price relative risks. As a
result, our alternate scenario factors in a 50 basis point (bp)-75
bp rise in 10-year bond yields relative to the base
and upside cases from 2013 onwards. In this scenario, we project the net public
debt burden would rise from 74% of GDP in 2011 to 90% in 2015 and to 101% by
2021.
Our revised scenarios
also take into account the significant negative revisions to historical GDP
data that the Bureau of Economic Analysis announced on July 29. From our
perspective, the effect of these revisions underscores two related points when
evaluating the likely debt trajectory of the U.S. government. First, the revisions
show that the recent recession was deeper than previously assumed, so the GDP
this year is lower than previously thought in both nominal and real terms.
Consequently, the debt burden is slightly higher. Second, the revised data
highlight the sub-par path of the current economic recovery when compared with
rebounds following previous post-war recessions. We believe the sluggish pace
of the current economic recovery could be consistent with the experiences of
countries that have had financial crises in which the slow process of debt deleveraging in the private sector leads to a persistent
drag on demand. As a result, our downside case scenario assumes relatively
modest real trend GDP growth of 2.5% and inflation of near 1.5% annually going
forward.
When comparing the U.S.
to sovereigns with 'AAA' long-term ratings that we view as relevant
peers--Canada, France, Germany, and the U.K.--we also observe, based on our
base case scenarios for each, that the trajectory of the U.S.'s net public debt
is diverging from the others. Including the U.S., we estimate that these five
sovereigns will have net general government debt to GDP ratios this year
ranging from 34% (Canada) to 80% (the U.K.), with the U.S. debt burden at 74%.
By 2015, we project that their net public debt to GDP ratios will range between
30% (lowest, Canada) and 83% (highest, France), with the U.S. debt burden at
79%. However, in contrast with the U.S., we project that the net public debt
burdens of these other sovereigns will begin to decline, either before or by
2015.
Standard & Poor's
transfer T&C assessment of the U.S. remains 'AAA'. Our T&C assessment
reflects our view of the likelihood of the sovereign restricting other public
and private issuers' access to foreign exchange needed to meet debt service.
Although in our view the credit standing of the U.S. government has
deteriorated modestly, we see little indication that official interference of
this kind is entering onto the policy agenda of either Congress or the
Administration. Consequently, we continue to view this risk as being highly
remote.
The outlook on the
long-term rating is negative. As our downside alternate fiscal scenario
illustrates, a higher public debt trajectory than we currently assume could
lead us to lower the long-term rating again. On the other hand, as our upside
scenario highlights, if the recommendations of the Congressional Joint Select
Committee on Deficit Reduction--independently or coupled with other
initiatives, such as the lapsing of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high
earners--lead to fiscal consolidation measures beyond the minimum mandated, and
we believe they are likely to slow the deterioration of the government's debt
dynamics, the long-term rating could stabilize at 'AA+'.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.60.71 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.102.04 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.83.77 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Analysis Done by
: |
SUM |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
NNA |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit transaction.
It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest and
principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect.
Satisfactory capability for payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall
operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with full
security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.