|
Report Date : |
12.12.2014 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
K.D.D. DIAM |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
|
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
28.08.2007 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Traders,
Importers, Exporters and Marketers of Diamonds of Various Sorts. |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
3 Employees |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Unknown |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES:
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – September 30, 2014
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (30.06.2014) |
Current Rating (30.09.2014) |
|
|
A2 |
A2 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
|
Source
: CIA |
K.D.D. DIAM
Telephone 972
3 575 60 88
Fax 972
3 751 90 65
Email: info@ronyduek.com
Diamond Exchange,
Noam Bldg.
A private limited
company, incorporated as per file No. 51-402292-0 on the 28.08.2007.
Authorized share
capital of
100,000 ordinary
shares of
1. Yoni Katester, 50%,
2. RONI DUEK DIAM
3. Ms. Dikla Duek, daughter of
Roni Duek, 25%.
Roni Duek used to hold 75% in subject and
Yoni Katester 25%.
In February 2010 Yoni Katester gained 25% in
subject and ownership was equally divided between above shareholders 1 & 2.
Another change in shareholding structure
took place in mid 2012, and later Ms. Dikla Duek became shareholder (taking Guy
Duek's shares) resulting in the present shareholding structure.
1. Yoni Katester, General Manager,
2. Aharon (Roni) Duek.
Traders,
importers, exporters and marketers of diamonds of various sorts.
Some 5%-10% of
sales are for export (sales for export comprised 20% of total sales in 2010 and
40% in 2008).
Among clients: M.
SCHNITZER & CO., RACHMINOV DIAM
Operating from offices,
owned by parent company (RONI DUEK DIAM
Having 3
employees, including General Manager (same as in 2013 and 2012, had 2 employees
in mid 2011, same as in 2010 and in 2009).
Financial data not
forthcoming, yet RONI DUEK DIAM
There is 1 charge for an unlimited amount registered on
the company's assets (financial and other assets), in favor of Israel Discount
Bank Ltd. Charge placed in December
2007.
Sales figures not
forthcoming.
RONI DUEK DIAM
Aharon (Roni) Duek
also holds:
R.G.E. DIAMONDS
LTD., 39% (additional 43% held by Dotan Duek and Guy Duek), traders, importers,
exporters and marketers of polished diamonds.
BLUE MOON DIAMONDS
LTD., 50%, incorporated in 2013, traders, importers, exporters and marketers of
diamonds of all sorts.
PROTEA DIAM
PROTEA DIAMONDS PTY,
PROTEA DIAMONDS CO. (1984) LTD.
TAL-LIRON DIAMONDS
LTD., 60%, established in 2005, traders, importers, exporters and marketers of
diamonds.
DUEK ET SASSON
DIAMONDS LTD., partially owned, diamond dealers.
Israel Discount
Bank Ltd., Diamond Exchange Branch (No. 080), Ramat Gan.
Nothing
unfavorable learnt.
Subject’s officials refused to disclose
financial details on their company.
Mr. Roni Duek is a
well-known local diamond dealer, enjoying good reputation.
Duek family is
wealthy and veteran in the diamonds business. Subject is part of the well-known
international PROTEA DIAMONDS Group, based in South Africa, founded by Moshe
Duek and later his sons Nissim, Roni and Moti Duek joined. The Group
manufactures and exports raw diamonds has offices also in Belgium, U.S.A. and
Australia.
Israel's diamond
industry remarked on impressive growth in almost all trade parameters in 2013,
from the data by Israel's Diamond Administration at the Ministry of Economics:
Net export of polished diamonds rose by 11.6% in value terms from 2012,
reaching US$6.2 billion. The market has been volatile in recent years: the
branch –in Israel as well as globally- experienced its worst depression in the
2nd half of 2008 and 2009 due to the global economic crisis (almost
an entire freeze and collapse in sales of about 70% in the peak of the crisis),
then recovered in 2010 and fell again in 2012 (net export fell 23% in 2012 from
2011).
Net export of
polished diamonds continued to grow in the 1st half of 2014 with 6%
rise in value terms compared to 2013 (fell 6.7% in karat terms), reaching
US$3.55 billion.
Net rough diamond
exports totaled US$2.9 billion in 2013, a mere rise from 2012, and totaled
US$1.75 billion in the 1stH 2014 (up 6% and 11.6% in value and in karat terms,
respectively).
Net imports of
polished diamonds remained in 2013 similar level as 2012 (after drop by 25% in
value in 2012 from 2011), totaling US$4.3 billion, and in the 1stH 2014 reached
US$2.05 billion (up 0.9% in value and 5.7% in karat). Net rough diamonds
imports rose 4% in 2013 summing up at US$4 billion, and summed at US$ 2.2
billion in the 1stH of 2014 (3% rise in value, 10% fall in karat terms).
The United States
continued to be Israel’s major market for polished diamonds, accounting for 37%
of the market in 2013 (35% in 2013). Hong Kong is the next largest market with
27% of exports, with Switzerland accounting for 9.3%, Belgium 7.3%, and India
accounting for 2.3% of Israel's polished diamond export.
According to the
President of the Israeli Diamonds Association, in 2010 the trade in the local
diamond sector rolled annual turnover of US$ 25 billion while total debt to the
banks stands on US$ 1.5 billion, down from US$ 2.4 billion in the eve of the
global crisis. The Ministry of Economics also assisted the local diamond
exporters by providing bank guarantees in total scope of NIS 1 billion.
In February 2009,
Israel was ranked as the world’s largest exporter of cut diamonds, followed by
India, Belgium and South Africa.
Local diamond
sector employs some 20,000 persons.
An affair of an
underground bank shocked the local diamond branch, after in late January 2012
Police raided the Diamond Exchange (after a long undercover operation),
arrested several individuals for investigation, caught diamonds and various
assets worth NIS millions, and blocked several bank accounts. It is suspected
that a group of people, including diamond dealers, run an illegal bank in the
Diamond Exchange compound for loans, money transfer abroad based on fictitious
transactions and exchange in volume of NIS 1 billion for several years.
The affair led to
several of reported bankruptcies of local diamond firms, a decrease of up to
70% in transactions in 2012, frozen bank accounts, and for a while to paralysis
(especially in purchase of raw diamonds) due to uncertainty among local and
foreign dealers.
In March 2012 the
Police decided to lower the profile of the investigation for a while a result
of the big pressure from the diamond branch (to stop the continuing damage
inflicted) and the Government (who is losing US$ hundred millions from decrease
in tax collection). In November 2012 the Police and Tax Authorities recommended
on indictments against the 25 suspects in the affair, among them diamond
dealers, for the said suspicions and obstruction of the investigation.
In June 2013 it
was reported that the Police resumed its raids on the diamonds branch, and although
names of suspects were not released, sources said that it is also related to
the above underground bank affair. In parallel, it is also reported that the
Tax Authorities and diamonds dealers' representatives are trying to reach an
arrangement for past debts.
In July 2014 3
indictments were filed to the Tel Aviv District Court against central
defendants in the affair, who provided foreign currency services to the
"underground bank" (not against diamond dealers at this stage), for
felonies of money laundering and tax evasion in volumes of US$ millions.
Notwithstanding
the refusal to disclose financial information, considered good for trade
engagements.
DIAMOND INDUSTRY – INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world as the birthplace
for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of diamonds but history
says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in India. Diamond
production in India can be traced back to almost 8th Century B.C.
India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th Century
when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of S.
Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was possible only due to
combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian workforce and the
untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires, supported by
progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses derives its
importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations which operate
in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business enterprises include
spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction costs, small,
nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage and
philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on many fronts including
higher standard of corporate governance, long-term performance – focused
strategies, modern management and technology.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with some medium and
large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious import – export,
inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In the process,
several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees. They mostly
diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and capital
markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th October 2010 is as
under –
-
Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council in its statistical data has
shown the export of polished diamonds to have increase by 28 % in February
2013. Compared to $ 1.4 bn worth of polished diamond export in February, 2012,
India exported $ 1.84 billion worth of polished diamonds in February 2013. A
senior executive of GJEPC said, “Export of cut and polished diamonds started
falling month-wise after the imposition of 2 % of import duty on the polished
diamonds. But February, 2013 has given a new ray of hope to the industry as the
export of polished diamonds has actually increased by 28 %. It means the
industry is on the track of recovery and round tripping of diamonds has
stopped completely.” Demand has started coming from the US, the UK, Japan and
China. India’s polished diamond export is expected to cross $ 21 bn in 2013-14.
-
The banking sector has started exercising restraint while following
prudent risk management norms when lending money to gems and jewellery sector.
This follows the implementation of Basel III accord – a global voluntary
regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy, stress testing and market
liquidity.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.62.21 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.97.80 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.77.48 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Analysis Done by
: |
RAS |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
NIT |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
|
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.