|
Report Date : |
28.02.2014 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
DIAROUGH SOURCING SA |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
12f, Rue Guillaume Kroll, 1882 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2011 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
18.11.2004 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
B 104.283 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Limited company by shares |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
dealer of diamond |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees |
Not Available |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Unknown |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made on
e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – december 01, 2013
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (30.09.2013) |
Current Rating (01.12.2013) |
|
Luxembourg |
A2 |
A2 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
Luxembourg ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
This small, stable, high-income
economy - benefiting from its proximity to France, Belgium, and Germany - has
historically featured solid growth, low inflation, and low unemployment. The
industrial sector, initially dominated by steel, has become increasingly
diversified to include chemicals, rubber, and other products. Growth in the
financial sector, which now accounts for about 27% of GDP, has more than
compensated for the decline in steel. Most banks are foreign-owned and have
extensive foreign dealings, but Luxembourg has lost some of its advantages as a
favorable tax location because of OECD and EU pressure. The economy depends on
foreign and cross-border workers for about 40% of its labor force. Luxembourg,
like all EU members, suffered from the global economic crisis that began in
late 2008, but unemployment has trended below the EU average. Following strong
expansion from 2004 to 2007, Luxembourg's economy contracted 3.6% in 2009, but
rebounded in 2010-11 before slowing again in 2012. The country continues to
enjoy an extraordinarily high standard of living - GDP per capita ranks among
the highest in the world, and is the highest in the euro zone. Turmoil in the
world financial markets and lower global demand during 2008-09 prompted the
government to inject capital into the banking sector and implement stimulus
measures to boost the economy. Government stimulus measures and support for the
banking sector, however, led to a 5% government budget deficit in 2009.
Nevertheless, the deficit was cut to 1.1% in 2011 and 0.9% in 2012. Even during
the financial crisis and recovery, Luxembourg retained the highest current
account surplus as a share of GDP in the euro zone, owing largely to their
strength in financial services. Public debt remains among the lowest of the
region although it has more than doubled since 2007 as percentage of GDP.
Luxembourg's economy, while stabile, grew slowly in 2012 due to ongoing weak
growth in the euro area. Authorities have strengthened supervision of domestic
banks because of their exposure to the activities of foreign banks.
|
Source : CIA |
|
Company
name |
DIAROUGH
SOURCING SA |
|
Operative
address |
|
|
Status |
Active |
|
Legal
form |
Limited company by shares |
|
Registration
number |
Trade register number: B
104.283 (Luxembourg) |
|
VAT-number |
LU21452838 |
|
Year |
2011 |
Mutation |
2010 |
Mutation |
2009 |
|
Fixed assets |
43.664.813 |
10,55 |
39.497.871 |
-6,19 |
42.103.221 |
|
Total equity |
319.317 |
54,31 |
206.933 |
133,38 |
88.666 |
|
Short term liabilities |
69.016.595 |
35,81 |
50.818.252 |
0,47 |
50.582.690 |
|
|
|||||
|
Net result |
|
|
|
-100,00 |
16.473 |
|
|
|||||
|
Working capital |
-4.130.301 |
-170,85 |
-1.524.961 |
-119,11 |
7.979.557 |
|
Quick ratio |
0,94 |
-3,09 |
0,97 |
-16,38 |
1,16 |
%2028-Feb-2014_files/image002.jpg)
|
Company
name |
DIAROUGH SOURCING SA |
|
Operative
address |
|
|
Correspondence address |
ULTIMATE GLOBAL SHAREHOLDER |
|
Registration
number |
Trade register number: B
104.283 (Luxembourg) |
|
VAT-number |
LU21452838 |
|
Status |
Active |
|
Establishment
date |
2004-11-18 |
|
Legal
form |
Limited company by shares |
|
Subscribed share capital |
EUR 77.179 |
dealer of diamond
|
Shareholders |
ULTIMATE GLOBAL SHAREHOLDER |
|
Management |
Fullname: Mr Nishit Mahendra
Kuma Parikh |
|
Trend |
Fluctuating |
|
Profitability |
Positive |
|
Solvability |
Limited |
|
Liquidity |
Negative |
|
Show amount in |
Euro |
Key figures
|
Year |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
Quick ratio |
0,94 |
0,97 |
1,16 |
|
|
|
Current ratio |
0,94 |
0,97 |
1,16 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Working capital/ balance total |
-0,04 |
-0,02 |
0,08 |
|
|
|
Equity / Fixed assets |
0,01 |
0,01 |
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
-4.130.301 |
-1.524.961 |
7.979.557 |
|
|
|
Equity |
319.317 |
206.933 |
88.666 |
|
|
|
Mutation equity |
54,31 |
133,38 |
|
|
|
|
Mutation short term liabilities |
35,81 |
0,47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Return on total assets (ROA) |
|
|
0,02 |
|
|
|
Return on equity (ROE) |
|
|
26,04 |
|
|
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
17,04 |
|
|
|
Net profit margin |
|
|
1,12 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Average collection ratio |
|
|
0,03 |
|
|
|
Equity turnover ratio |
|
|
16,62 |
|
|
|
Total assets turnover ratio |
|
|
0,01 |
|
|
|
Fixed assets turnover ratio |
|
|
0,03 |
|
|
|
Inventory conversion ratio |
|
|
47,11 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Turnover |
|
|
1.473.457 |
|
|
|
Operating result |
|
|
251.120 |
|
|
|
Net result after taxes |
|
|
16.473 |
|
|
|
Summary |
The 2011 financial result
structure is a negative working capital of -4.130.301 euro, which is in
agreement with -4 % of the total assets of the company.
The deterioration between
2010 and 2011 has mainly been caused by an increase of the current liabilities. The current ratio of the
company in 2011 was 0.94. When the current ratio is below 1.5, the company
may have problems meeting its short-term obligations. The quick ratio in 2011 of
the company was 0.94. A company with a Quick Ratio of less than 1 cannot
currently pay back its current liabilities. The working capital has
diminished with -119.11 % compared to previous year. The ratio, with respect
to the total assets of the company has however, declined. The deterioration between
2009 and 2010 has mainly been caused by an increase of the current
liabilities. The current ratio of the
company in 2010 was 0.97. When the current ratio is below 1.5, the company
may have problems meeting its short-term obligations. The quick ratio in 2010 of
the company was 0.97. A company with a Quick Ratio of less than 1 cannot
currently pay back its current liabilities. |
%2028-Feb-2014_files/image004.jpg)
%2028-Feb-2014_files/image006.jpg)
|
Last annual account |
2011 |
|
Remark annual account |
The company is obliged to file its financial statements. |
|
Type of annual account |
Corporate |
|
Annual
account |
DIAROUGH
SOURCING SA |
Balance sheet
|
Year |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
End date |
2011-12-31 |
2010-12-31 |
2009-12-31 |
|
|
|
Other fixed assets |
43.664.813 |
39.497.871 |
42.103.221 |
|
|
|
Fixed assets |
43.664.813 |
39.497.871 |
42.103.221 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Inventories |
|
|
31.276 |
|
|
|
Liquid funds |
1.775.961 |
6.653.786 |
4.877.790 |
|
|
|
Other current assets |
63.110.333 |
42.639.505 |
53.653.181 |
|
|
|
Current assets |
64.886.294 |
49.293.291 |
58.562.247 |
|
|
|
Total assets |
108.551.107 |
88.791.162 |
100.665.468 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Total equity |
319.317 |
206.933 |
88.666 |
|
|
|
Provisions |
111.141 |
71.581 |
24.817 |
|
|
|
Long term liabilities |
39.104.054 |
37.694.396 |
49.969.295 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
58.626.802 |
41.413.993 |
40.217.624 |
|
|
|
Liabilities towards credit institutes |
|
|
1.152 |
|
|
|
Other short term liabilities |
10.389.793 |
9.404.259 |
10.363.914 |
|
|
|
Short term liabilities |
69.016.595 |
50.818.252 |
50.582.690 |
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
108.551.107 |
88.791.162 |
100.665.468 |
|
|
|
Summary |
The total assets of the
company increased with 22.25 % between 2010 and 2011.
|
%2028-Feb-2014_files/image008.jpg)
%2028-Feb-2014_files/image010.jpg)
Profit and loss
|
Year |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
454.269.903 |
|
|
|
Net turnover |
|
|
1.473.457 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Operating result |
|
|
251.120 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Financial income |
|
|
3.371.096 |
|
|
|
Financial expenses |
|
|
3.599.129 |
|
|
|
Financial result |
|
|
-228.033 |
|
|
|
Result on ordinary operations before taxes |
|
|
23.088 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Taxation on the result of ordinary activities |
|
|
6.615 |
|
|
|
Result of ordinary activities after taxes |
|
|
16.473 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net result |
|
|
16.473 |
|
|
%2028-Feb-2014_files/image012.jpg)
%2028-Feb-2014_files/image014.jpg)
|
Remarks |
Status: Active |
DIAMOND INDUSTRY – INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world as the birthplace
for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of diamonds but history
says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in India. Diamond
production in India can be traced back to almost 8th Century B.C.
India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th Century
when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of S.
Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was possible only due to
combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian workforce and the
untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires, supported by
progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses derives its
importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations which operate
in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business enterprises include
spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction costs, small,
nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage and
philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on many fronts including
higher standard of corporate governance, long-term performance – focused
strategies, modern management and technology.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with some medium and
large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious import – export,
inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In the process,
several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees. They mostly
diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and capital
markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th October 2010 is as
under –
-
Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council in its statistical data has
shown the export of polished diamonds to have increase by 28 % in February
2013. Compared to $ 1.4 bn worth of polished diamond export in February, 2012,
India exported $ 1.84 billion worth of polished diamonds in February 2013. A
senior executive of GJEPC said, “Export of cut and polished diamonds started
falling month-wise after the imposition of 2 % of import duty on the polished
diamonds. But February, 2013 has given a new ray of hope to the industry as the
export of polished diamonds has actually increased by 28 %. It means the industry
is on the track of recovery and round tripping of diamonds has stopped
completely.” Demand has started coming from the US, the UK, Japan and China.
India’s polished diamond export is expected to cross $ 21 bn in 2013-14.
-
The banking sector has started exercising restraint while following
prudent risk management norms when lending money to gems and jewellery sector.
This follows the implementation of Basel III accord – a global voluntary
regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy, stress testing and market
liquidity.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.61.94 |
|
UK Pound |
1 |
Rs.103.31 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.85.11 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Report Prepared
by : |
MNL |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable
factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of
interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to
overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
|
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL) or
its officials.