MIRA INFORM REPORT
|
Report Date : |
27.01.2014 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
AWARD GEMS COMPANY LIMITED |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
5/19 Soi Silom 11, |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2012 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
1991 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
0105534100574 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Importer and Distributor of Precious and
Semi-Precious Stones |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
2 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Slow but correct |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – September 30, 2013
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (30.06.2013) |
Current Rating (30.09.2013) |
|
Thailand |
B1 |
B1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
THAILAND - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
With a well-developed infrastructure, a free-enterprise economy, generally pro-investment policies, and strong export industries, Thailand achieved steady growth due largely to industrial and agriculture exports - mostly electronics, agricultural commodities, automobiles and parts, and processed foods. Thailand is trying to maintain growth by encouraging domestic consumption and public investment to offset weak exports in 2012. Unemployment, at less than 1% of the labor force, stands as one of the lowest levels in the world, which puts upward pressure on wages in some industries. Thailand also attracts nearly 2.5 million migrant workers from neighboring countries. The Thai government is implementing a nation-wide 300 baht ($10) per day minimum wage policy and deploying new tax reforms designed to lower rates on middle-income earners. The Thai economy has weathered internal and external economic shocks in recent years. The global economic crisis severely cut Thailand's exports, with most sectors experiencing double-digit drops. In 2009, the economy contracted 2.3%. However, in 2010, Thailand's economy expanded 7.8%, its fastest pace since 1995, as exports rebounded. In late 2011 growth was interrupted by historic flooding in the industrial areas in Bangkok and its five surrounding provinces, crippling the manufacturing sector. Industry recovered from the second quarter of 2012 onward with GDP growth at 5.5% in 2012. The government has approved flood mitigation projects worth $11.7 billion, which were started in 2012, to prevent similar economic damage, and an additional $75 billion for infrastructure over the next seven years with a plan to start in 2013.
|
Source
: CIA |
AWARD GEMS COMPANY
LIMITED
BUSINESS ADDRESS : 5/19 SOI SILOM
11, SILOM ROAD,
SILOM, BANGRAK,
BANGKOK 10500,
THAILAND
TELEPHONE : [66] 081
620-8147
FAX : [66] 2266-7774
E-MAIL ADDRESS : awardgems@hotmail.com
REGISTRATION ADDRESS : SAME AS BUSINESS
ADDRESS
ESTABLISHED : 1991
REGISTRATION NO. : 0105534100574
TAX ID NO. : 3011023532
CAPITAL REGISTERED : BHT.
5,000,000
CAPITAL PAID-UP : BHT.
5,000,000
SHAREHOLDER’S PROPORTION : THAI
: 51.00%
INDIAN : 49.00%
FISCAL YEAR CLOSING DATE : DECEMBER 31
LEGAL STATUS : PRIVATE LIMITED
COMPANY
EXECUTIVE : MR.
SALIM UDDIN, INDIAN
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO. OF STAFF : 2
LINES OF BUSINESS : PRECIOUS AND SEMI-PRECIOUS STONES
IMPORTER AND
DISTRIBUTOR
OPERATING TREND : STABLE
PRESENT SITUATION : OPERATING NORMALLY
REPUTATION : FAIR
WITH NORMAL BUSINESS
ENGAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT STANDARD : MANAGEMENT
WITH FAIR PERFORMANCE
The subject was
established on October 24,
1991 as a
private limited company
under the registered
name AWARD GEMS
COMPANY LIMITED by Thai and
Indian groups, with the
business objective to
import and distribute
precious and semi-precious
stones for jewelry
industry. It currently
employs 2 staff.
The subject’s registered
address is 5/19
Soi Silom 11,
Silom Rd., Silom,
Bangrak, Bangkok 10500,
and this is
the subject’s current
operation address.
|
Name |
|
Nationality |
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Salim Uddin |
|
Indian |
49 |
|
Mr. Hasin Uddin |
|
Indian |
25 |
One of the
above directors signs
on behalf of the subject
with company’s affixed.
Mr. Salim Uddin is
the Managing Director.
He is Indian
nationality with the
age of 49 years
old.
The subject is engaged
in importing and
distributing precious and
semi-precious stones, such
as ruby, aquamarine,
rubylite stone, yellow
sapphire, kunzite for jewelry
production.
Most of the
products are imported
from India and
Sri Lanka, the
remaining is purchased
from local suppliers.
100% of the
products is sold
locally to wholesalers,
manufacturers and end-users.
The subject is
not found to
have any subsidiary
or affiliated company
here in Thailand.
Bankruptcy and Receivership
There are no
litigation on bankruptcy
and receivership cases
filed against the
subject found at
Legal Execution Department
for the past
five years.
Others
There are no
legal suits filed
against the subject
according for the
past two years.
Sales are by
cash or on
the credits term
of 30-60 days.
Local bills are
paid by cash
or on the
credits term of 30-60
days.
Imports are by
T/T.
The banker’s name
was not disclosed.
The subject currently
employs 2 staff.
The premise is
rented for administrative office
at the heading
address. Premise is
located in a
prime commercial area.
The political turmoil
has weakened consumer
confidence and encouraged
capital outflows, while
the baht retreat
to a three years low
has pushed up importers’
costs.
Operator is not
confident on sales
improvement this year.
Subject’s business has
shown slow performance
during the past
few months.
The capital was registered at Bht. 2,000,000 divided into 2,000 shares of Bht. 1,000
each with fully
paid.
The capital was
increased later as
follows:
Bht. 4,000,000
on October 30,
2003
Bht. 6,000,000
on October 28,
2004
On December 29,
2011, the registered
capital was decreased
to Bht. 5,000,000
divided into 5,000
shares of Bht.
1,000 each with
fully paid.
[as at
April 30, 2013]
|
NAME |
HOLDING |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs. Boonta Khanobdee Nationality: Thai Address : 143/83
Charansanitwong Road, Bang-or,
Bangplad, Bangkok |
2,550 |
51.00 |
|
Mr. Salim Uddin Nationality: Indian Address : 5/19
Soi Silom 11,
Silom Rd., Silom,
Bangrak, Bangkok |
2,000 |
40.00 |
|
Mr. Hasin Uddin Nationality: Indian Address : 5/19
Soi Silom 11,
Silom Rd., Silom,
Bangrak, Bangkok |
450 |
9.00 |
Total Shareholders : 3
Share Structure [as
at April 30,
2013]
|
Nationality |
Shareholders |
No. of Share |
% Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thai |
1 |
2,550 |
51.00 |
|
Foreign - Indian |
2 |
2,450 |
49.00 |
|
Total |
3 |
5,000 |
100.00 |
Mrs. Chitchong Srivacharakul No. 0552
The latest
financial figures published
for December 31, 2012,
2011 & 2010
were:
ASSETS
|
Current Assets |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
179,234.01 |
80,869.92 |
31,464.25 |
|
Trade Accounts Receivable
|
4,403,494.44 |
4,183,843.73 |
2,358,485.70 |
|
Inventories |
4,389,359.49 |
4,800,692.56 |
5,265,032.13 |
|
Revenue Department Receivable
|
309,294.41 |
341,535.57 |
341,765.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
9,281,382.35 |
9,406,941.78 |
7,996,747.09 |
|
Total Assets |
9,281,382.35 |
9,406,941.78 |
7,996,747.09 |
LIABILITIES &
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY [BAHT]
|
Current Liabilities |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Accounts & Other
Payable |
601,966.66 |
298,858.90 |
290,197.96 |
|
Short-term Loan from Person
or Related Company |
2,600,000.00 |
3,300,000.00 |
1,500,000.00 |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
82,404.33 |
175,572.13 |
38,600.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
3,284,370.99 |
3,774,431.03 |
1,828,798.59 |
|
Total Liabilities |
3,284,370.99 |
3,774,431.03 |
1,828,798.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital : Baht 1,000
value authorized, issued
and fully paid share
capital 5,000 shares
in 2012 & 2011; 6,000
shares in 2010
|
5,000,000.00 |
5,000,000.00 |
6,000,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Paid |
5,000,000.00 |
5,000,000.00 |
6,000,000.00 |
|
Retained Earning - Unappropriated |
997,011.36 |
632,510.75 |
167,948.50 |
|
Total Shareholders' Equity |
5,997,011.36 |
5,632,510.75 |
6,197,948.50 |
|
Total Liabilities &
Shareholders' Equity |
9,281,382.35 |
9,406,941.78 |
7,996,747.09 |
|
Revenue |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
7,553,441.99 |
6,815,923.53 |
5,380,714.96 |
|
Other Income |
- |
198,420.43 |
- |
|
Total Revenues |
7,553,441.99 |
7,014,343.96 |
5,380,714.96 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods
Sold |
5,473,437.20 |
5,265,784.84 |
3,779,087.09 |
|
Selling and Administrative Expenses |
1,590,545.63 |
1,226,777.74 |
1,308,710.54 |
|
Loss on Exchange
Rate |
87,000.22 |
- |
144,067.28 |
|
Total Expenses |
7,150,983.05 |
6,492,562.58 |
5,231,864.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit / [Loss] before Income Tax |
402,458.94 |
521,781.38 |
148,850.05 |
|
Income Tax |
[37,958.33] |
[57,219.13] |
[45,060.64] |
|
Net Profit / [Loss] |
364,500.61 |
464,562.25 |
103,789.41 |
|
ITEM |
UNIT |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT RATIO |
TIMES |
2.83 |
2.49 |
4.37 |
|
QUICK RATIO |
TIMES |
1.40 |
1.13 |
1.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
- |
- |
- |
|
TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
0.81 |
0.72 |
0.67 |
|
INVENTORY CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
292.71 |
332.76 |
508.52 |
|
INVENTORY TURNOVER |
TIMES |
1.25 |
1.10 |
0.72 |
|
RECEIVABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
212.79 |
224.05 |
159.99 |
|
RECEIVABLES TURNOVER |
TIMES |
1.72 |
1.63 |
2.28 |
|
PAYABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
40.14 |
20.72 |
28.03 |
|
CASH CONVERSION CYCLE |
DAYS |
465.35 |
536.10 |
640.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFITABILITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
% |
72.46 |
77.26 |
70.23 |
|
SELLING & ADMINISTRATION |
% |
21.06 |
18.00 |
24.32 |
|
INTEREST |
% |
- |
- |
- |
|
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
27.54 |
25.65 |
29.77 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN BEFORE EX. ITEM |
% |
5.33 |
7.66 |
2.77 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
4.83 |
6.82 |
1.93 |
|
RETURN ON EQUITY |
% |
6.08 |
8.25 |
1.67 |
|
RETURN ON ASSET |
% |
3.93 |
4.94 |
1.30 |
|
EARNING PER SHARE |
BAHT |
72.90 |
92.91 |
17.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVERAGE RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
DEBT RATIO |
TIMES |
0.35 |
0.40 |
0.23 |
|
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO |
TIMES |
0.55 |
0.67 |
0.30 |
|
TIME INTEREST EARNED |
TIMES |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL GROWTH |
|
|
|
|
|
SALES GROWTH |
% |
10.82 |
26.67 |
|
|
OPERATING PROFIT |
% |
(22.87) |
250.54 |
|
|
NET PROFIT |
% |
(21.54) |
347.60 |
|
|
FIXED ASSETS |
% |
- |
- |
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
% |
(1.33) |
17.63 |
|
An annual sales growth is 10.82%. Turnover has increased from THB
6,815,923.53 in 2011 to THB 7,553,441.99 in 2012. While net profit has
decreased from THB 464,562.25 in 2011 to THB 364,500.61 in 2012. And total
assets has decreased from THB 9,406,941.78 in 2011 to THB 9,281,382.35 in 2012.
PROFITABILITY :
IMPRESSIVE

PROFITABILITY
RATIO
|
Gross Profit Margin |
27.54 |
Impressive |
Industrial Average |
10.08 |
|
Net Profit Margin |
4.83 |
Impressive |
Industrial Average |
0.43 |
|
Return on Assets |
3.93 |
Impressive |
Industrial Average |
2.89 |
|
Return on Equity |
6.08 |
Acceptable |
Industrial Average |
8.18 |
Gross Profit Margin used to assess a firm's financial health by revealing
the proportion of money left over from revenues after accounting for the cost
of goods sold. Gross profit margin serves as the source for paying additional
expenses and future savings. Gross Profit Margin is 27.54%. When compared with
the industry average, the ratio of the company was higher, indicated that
company was more profitable than the same industry.
Net Profit Margin is the indicator of the company's efficiency in that
net profit takes into consideration all expenses of the company. A low profit
margin indicates a low margin of safety, higher risk that a decline in sales
will erase profits and result in a net loss. Net Profit Margin ratio is 4.83%,
higher figure when compared with those of its average competitors in the same
industry, indicated that business was an efficient operator in a dominant position within its industry.
Return on Assets measures how efficiently profits are being generated
from the assets employed in the business when compared with the ratios of firms
in a similar business. A low ratio in comparison with industry averages
indicates an inefficient use of business assets. Return on Assets ratio is
3.93%, higher figure when compared with those of its average competitors in the
same industry, indicated that business was an efficient profit in a dominant position within its industry.
Return on Equity indicates how profitable a company is by comparing its
net income to its average shareholders' equity, ROE measures how much the
shareholders earned for their investment in the company. When compared with the
industry average, it was lower, the company's figure is 6.08%.
Trend of the average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Return on Assets Uptrend
Return on Equity Uptrend
LIQUIDITY :
ACCEPTABLE

LIQUIDITY RATIO
|
Current Ratio |
2.83 |
Impressive |
Industrial Average |
2.20 |
|
Quick Ratio |
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Conversion Cycle |
465.35 |
|
|
|
The Current Ratio is to ascertain whether a company's short-term assets are
readily available to pay off its short-term liabilities. The company's figure
is 2.83 times in 2012, decrease from 2.49 times, then it is generally
considered to have good short-term financial strength. When compared with the
industry average, the ratio of the company was higher, indicated that company
was an efficient operator in a dominant position within its industry.
The Quick Ratio is a liquidity indicator that further refines the
current ratio by measuring the amount of the most liquid current assets there
are to cover current liabilities. The company's figure is 1.4 times in 2012,
decrease from 1.13 times, although excluding inventory so the company still
have good short-term financial strength.
The Cash Conversion Cycle measures the number of days a company's cash
is tied up in the production and sales process of its operations and the
benefit from payment terms from its creditors. It meant the company could
survive when no cash inflow was received from sale for 466 days.
Trend of the average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Current Ratio Uptrend
LEVERAGE :
EXCELLENT


LEVERAGE RATIO
|
Debt Ratio |
0.35 |
Impressive |
Industrial Average |
0.64 |
|
Debt to Equity Ratio |
0.55 |
Impressive |
Industrial Average |
1.79 |
|
Times Interest Earned |
- |
|
Industrial Average |
- |
Debt to Equity Ratio a measurement of how much suppliers, lenders,
creditors and obligors have committed to the company versus what the
shareholders have committed. A lower the percentage means that the company is
using less leverage and has a stronger equity position.
Debt Ratio shows the proportion of a company's assets which are financed
through debt. The company's figure is 0.35 less than 0.5, most of the company's
assets are financed through equity.
Trend of the average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Debt Ratio Uptrend
Times Interest Earned Stable
ACTIVITY : RISKY

ACTIVITY RATIO
|
Fixed Assets Turnover |
- |
|
Industrial Average |
- |
|
Total Assets Turnover |
0.81 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial Average |
6.65 |
|
Inventory Conversion Period |
292.71 |
|
|
|
|
Inventory Turnover |
1.25 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial Average |
10.80 |
|
Receivables Conversion Period |
212.79 |
|
|
|
|
Receivables Turnover |
1.72 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial Average |
15.99 |
|
Payables Conversion Period |
40.14 |
|
|
|
The company's Account Receivable Ratio is calculated as 1.72 and 1.63 in
2012 and 2011 respectively. This ratio measures the efficiency of the company
in managing its trade debtors to generate revenue. A lower ratio may indicate
over extension and collection problems. Conversely, a higher ratio may indicate
an overtly stringent policy. In this case, the company's A/R ratio in 2012
increased from 2011. This would suggest the company had good performance in the
management of its debt collections.
Inventory Turnover in Days Ratio indicates the liquidity of inventory.
It estimates the number of days that it will take to sell the current
inventory. Inventory is particularly sensitive to change in business
activities. The inventory turnover in days has decreased from 333 days at the
end of 2011 to 293 days at the end of 2012. This represents a positive trend.
And Inventory turnover has increased from 1.1 times in year 2011 to 1.25 times
in year 2012.
The company's Total Asset Turnover is calculated as 0.81 times and 0.72
times in 2012 and 2011 respectively. This ratio is determined by dividing total
assets into total sales turnover. The ratio measures the activity of the assets
and the ability of the firm to generate sales through the use of the assets.
Trend of the average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Fixed Assets Turnover Stable
Total Assets Turnover Uptrend
Inventory Turnover Uptrend
Receivables Turnover Uptrend
DIAMOND INDUSTRY – INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world as the birthplace
for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of diamonds but history
says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in India. Diamond
production in India can be traced back to almost 8th Century B.C.
India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th Century
when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of S.
Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was possible only due to
combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian workforce and the untiring
and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires, supported by progressive
Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses derives its
importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations which operate
in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business enterprises include
spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction costs, small,
nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage and philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on many fronts including
higher standard of corporate governance, long-term performance – focused
strategies, modern management and technology.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with some medium and
large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious import – export,
inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In the process,
several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees. They mostly
diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and capital
markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th October 2010 is as
under –
-
Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council in its statistical data has
shown the export of polished diamonds to have increase by 28 % in February
2013. Compared to $ 1.4 bn worth of polished diamond export in February, 2012,
India exported $ 1.84 billion worth of polished diamonds in February 2013. A
senior executive of GJEPC said, “Export of cut and polished diamonds started
falling month-wise after the imposition of 2 % of import duty on the polished
diamonds. But February, 2013 has given a new ray of hope to the industry as the
export of polished diamonds has actually increased by 28 %. It means the
industry is on the track of recovery and round tripping of diamonds has
stopped completely.” Demand has started coming from the US, the UK, Japan and
China. India’s polished diamond export is expected to cross $ 21 bn in 2013-14.
-
The banking sector has started exercising restraint while following
prudent risk management norms when lending money to gems and jewellery sector.
This follows the implementation of Basel III accord – a global voluntary
regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy, stress testing and market liquidity.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.62.18 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.103.38 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.85.09 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Report Prepared
by : |
NNA |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit transaction.
It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest and
principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to
overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
---- |
NB |
New Business |
---- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk and
to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.