|
Report Date : |
03.06.2014 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
KALP DIAMONDS |
|
|
|
|
Registered
Office : |
207, WDC Comm Complex, Hat Faliya, Haripura, Surat-395003, Gujarat |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
India |
|
|
|
|
Year of Establishment
: |
1995 |
|
|
|
|
Capital
Investment / Paid-up Capital : |
Not Divulged |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Partnership Concern with an unlimited liability of the partners |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business
: |
Manufacturer of Diamonds. |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees
: |
Information denied by the management. |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B (28) |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Slow but correct |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
|
|
|
|
Comments : |
Subject is an established partnership concern having a moderate track record.
Mr. Prakash Patel, Accounts Manager provided general details and denied to
disclose any financial details. As per the information available from indirect source i.e. CRISIL it
seems that the concern possesses a modest financial and operational profile
during the year under review. However, trade relations are fair. Business is active. Payments are
reported as slow but correct. In view of extensive experience of the promoters, the concern can be
considered for business dealings with some caution. |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – March 31, 2014
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.12.2013) |
Current Rating (31.03.2014) |
|
India |
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
INDIAN ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
US investment bank
Goldman Sachs has upgraded its outlook on Indian markets as it expects
positive impact of the election cycle.
India’s economy may
grow 4.7 % in the current financial year, lower than the official estimate of
4.9 %, Fitch Rating said. The global rating agency expects the economy to pick
up in the next two financial years.
Global ratings
agency Standard & Poor said increasing focus by India Inc on lowering debt
is likely to improve their credit profiles.
Singapore (1.1
million Indian tourists in 2012), Thailand (one million), the United Arab
Emirates ().98 million) and Malaysia ().82 million) emerged as the preferred
holidays hotspots for Indians. The total figure is expected to increase to 1.93
million by 2017, according to the latest Eurmonitor international report.
There is a $29.34 bn
outward foreign direct investment by domestic companies between April and
January of 2013/14 which has seen some signs of recovery according to a Care
Ratings report.
There are 264 number
of new companies being set up every day on average during 2014. Most of them
are registered in Mumbai. India had 1.38 million registered companies at the
end of January, 2014.
Twitter like
messaging service Weibo Corporation has filed to raise $ 500 million via a US
initial public offering. Alibaba, which owns a stake in Weibo is expected to
raise about $ 15 billion New York this year in the highest profile Internet IPO
since Facebook’s in 2012.
Bharti Airtel has raised
Rs.2,453.2 crore (350 million Swiss Francs) by selling six-year bonds at a
coupon rate of three per cent and maturing in 2020. This is the largest ever
bond offering by an Indian company in Swiss Francs. Bharat Petroleum
Corporation raised 175 million Swiss Francs by selling five year bonds at 2.98
% coupon rate in February.
Indian Oil
Corporation plans to invest Rs 7650 crore in setting up a petrochemical complex
at its almost complete Paradip refinery in Odhisha in three to four years. The
company board is set to consider the setting up of a 700000 tonne per annum
polypropylene plant at an estimated cost at Rs.3150 crore.
Global chief
information officers at gathering in Bangalore in April to meet Indian startups
at an event called Tech50 Watchout for Little Eye Labs-Facebook type deals in
the making.
EXTERNAL AGENCY RATING
|
Rating Agency Name |
CRISIL |
|
Rating |
BB – [Long Term] |
|
Rating Explanation |
Moderate risk of default regarding payments. |
|
Date |
12.12.2013 |
RBI DEFAULTERS’ LIST STATUS
Subject’s name is not enlisted as a defaulter
in the publicly available RBI Defaulters’ list.
EPF (Employee Provident Fund) DEFAULTERS’ LIST STATUS
Subject’s name is not enlisted as a defaulter in
the publicly available EPF (Employee Provident Fund) Defaulters’ list as of
31-03-2012.
INFORMATION PARTED BY [GENERAL DETAILS]
|
Name : |
Mr. Prakash Patel |
|
Designation : |
Accounts Manager |
|
Contact No.: |
91-9426237682 |
LOCATIONS
|
Registered Office : |
207, WDC Comm Complex, Hat Faliya, Haripura, Surat-395003, Gujarat,
India |
|
Tel. No.: |
91-261-2422324 |
|
Mobile No.: |
91-9426237682 [Mr. Prakash Patel] |
|
Fax No.: |
Not Available |
|
|
|
|
Factory : |
Located at Kapurwadi, Surat, Gujarat, India |
|
|
|
|
Branch Office : |
CW 4160, Bharat Diamond Brouse, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East),
Mumbai-400051, Maharashtra, India Note: As claimed by
Mr. Jayesh Shah, Partner he informed that company having branch in above
address and company having 6 partner.
|
PARTNERS
|
Name : |
Mr. Anandlal Shah |
|
Designation : |
Partner |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
70 Years |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mrs. Geetaben Shah |
|
Designation : |
Partner |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
67 Years |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Bhavik Shah |
|
Designation : |
Partner |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
38 Years |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Jayesh Shah |
|
Designation : |
Partner |
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
45 Years |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Ms. Dipti Shah |
|
Designation : |
Partner |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Jigisha Shah |
|
Designation : |
Partner |
KEY EXECUTIVES
|
Name : |
Mr. Prakash Patel |
|
Designation : |
Accounts Manager |
BUSINESS DETAILS
|
Line of Business : |
Manufacturer of Diamonds. |
|
|
|
|
Imports : |
|
|
Products : |
Belgium |
|
Countries : |
|
|
|
|
|
Terms : |
|
|
Selling : |
Cash and Credit |
|
|
|
|
Purchasing : |
Cash and Credit |
GENERAL INFORMATION
|
No. of Employees : |
Information denied by the management. |
|
|
|
|
Bankers : |
Not Available |
|
|
|
|
Banking
Relations : |
-- |
|
|
|
|
Auditors : |
Not Available |
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
|
Capital Investment : |
|
|
Owned : |
Not Divulged |
|
Borrowed : |
Not Divulged |
|
Total : |
Not Divulged |
FINANCIAL DATA
[all figures are
in Rupees Millions]
NOT DIVULGED
The above information has been declined by Mr. Prakash Patel.
Note : Sole Proprietary and Partnership concerns are exempted
from filing their financials with the Government Authorities or Registry.
LOCAL AGENCY FURTHER INFORMATION
|
Sr. No. |
Check List by
Info Agents |
Available in
Report (Yes / No) |
|
1] |
Year of Establishment |
Yes |
|
2] |
Locality of the firm |
Yes |
|
3] |
Constitutions of the firm |
Yes |
|
4] |
Premises details |
No |
|
5] |
Type of Business |
Yes |
|
6] |
Line of Business |
Yes |
|
7] |
Promoter's background |
No |
|
8] |
No. of employees |
No |
|
9] |
Name of person contacted |
Yes |
|
10] |
Designation of contact person |
Yes |
|
11] |
Turnover of firm for last three years |
No |
|
12] |
Profitability for last three years |
No |
|
13] |
Reasons for variation <> 20% |
-- |
|
14] |
Estimation for coming financial year |
No |
|
15] |
Capital in the business |
No |
|
16] |
Details of sister concerns |
No |
|
17] |
Major suppliers |
No |
|
18] |
Major customers |
No |
|
19] |
Payments terms |
Yes |
|
20] |
Export / Import details (if applicable) |
Yes |
|
21] |
Market information |
-- |
|
22] |
Litigations that the firm / promoter involved in |
-- |
|
23] |
Banking Details |
No |
|
24] |
Banking facility details |
No |
|
25] |
Conduct of the banking account |
-- |
|
26] |
Buyer visit details |
-- |
|
27] |
Financials, if provided |
No |
|
28] |
Incorporation details, if applicable |
No |
|
29] |
Last accounts filed at ROC |
No |
|
30] |
Major Shareholders, if available |
No |
|
31] |
PAN of Proprietor/Partner/Director, if available |
No |
|
32] |
Date
of Birth of Proprietor/Partner/Director, if available |
Yes |
|
33] |
Voter ID No of Proprietor/Partner/Director, if available |
No |
|
34] |
External Agency Rating, if available |
Yes |
DIAMOND INDUSTRY –
INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the
world as the birthplace for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin
of diamonds but history says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only
in India. Diamond production in India can be traced back to almost 8th
Century B.C. India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th
Century when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of
S. Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was
possible only due to combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian
workforce and the untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires,
supported by progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond
businesses derives its importance from the huge conglomerate of family run
organizations which operate in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business
enterprises include spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction
costs, small, nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage
and philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on
many fronts including higher standard of corporate governance, long-term performance
– focused strategies, modern management and technology.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing
with some medium and large diamond traders which are usually engaged in
fictitious import – export, inter-company transactions, financially assisted by
banks. In the process, several public sector banks lost several hundred million
rupees. They mostly diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real
estate and capital markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th
October 2010 is as under –
-
Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council in its
statistical data has shown the export of polished diamonds to have increase by
28 % in February 2013. Compared to $ 1.4 bn worth of polished diamond export in
February, 2012, India exported $ 1.84 billion worth of polished diamonds in
February 2013. A senior executive of GJEPC said, “Export of cut and polished
diamonds started falling month-wise after the imposition of 2 % of import duty
on the polished diamonds. But February, 2013 has given a new ray of hope to the
industry as the export of polished diamonds has actually increased by 28 %. It
means the industry is on the track of recovery and round tripping of
diamonds has stopped completely.” Demand has started coming from the US, the
UK, Japan and China. India’s polished diamond export is expected to cross $ 21
bn in 2013-14.
-
The banking sector has started exercising restraint
while following prudent risk management norms when lending money to gems and
jewellery sector. This follows the implementation of Basel III accord – a
global voluntary regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy, stress testing
and market liquidity.
CMT REPORT (Corruption, Money Laundering & Terrorism]
The Public Notice information has been collected from various sources including
but not limited to: The Courts,
1] INFORMATION ON
DESIGNATED PARTY
No records exist designating subject or any of its beneficial owners,
controlling shareholders or senior officers as terrorist or terrorist organization
or whom notice had been received that all financial transactions involving
their assets have been blocked or convicted, found guilty or against whom a
judgement or order had been entered in a proceedings for violating
money-laundering, anti-corruption or bribery or international economic or
anti-terrorism sanction laws or whose assets were seized, blocked, frozen or
ordered forfeited for violation of money laundering or international
anti-terrorism laws.
2] Court Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that subject is
or was the subject of any formal or informal allegations, prosecutions or other
official proceeding for making any prohibited payments or other improper
payments to government officials for engaging in prohibited transactions or
with designated parties.
3] Asset Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that the property or assets of the subject
are derived from criminal conduct or a prohibited transaction.
4] Record on Financial
Crime :
Charges or conviction
registered against subject: None
5] Records on Violation of
Anti-Corruption Laws :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
6] Records on Int’l
Anti-Money Laundering Laws/Standards :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
7] Criminal Records
No
available information exist that suggest that subject or any of its principals
have been formally charged or convicted by a competent governmental authority
for any financial crime or under any formal investigation by a competent government
authority for any violation of anti-corruption laws or international anti-money
laundering laws or standard.
8] Affiliation with
Government :
No record
exists to suggest that any director or indirect owners, controlling
shareholders, director, officer or employee of the company is a government
official or a family member or close business associate of a Government
official.
9] Compensation Package :
Our market
survey revealed that the amount of compensation sought by the subject is fair
and reasonable and comparable to compensation paid to others for similar
services.
10] Press Report :
No press reports / filings exists on
the subject.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MIRA INFORM as part of its Due Diligence do provide comments on
Corporate Governance to identify management and governance. These factors often
have been predictive and in some cases have created vulnerabilities to credit
deterioration.
Our Governance Assessment focuses principally on the interactions
between a company’s management, its Board of Directors, Shareholders and other
financial stakeholders.
CONTRAVENTION
Subject is not known to have contravened any existing local laws,
regulations or policies that prohibit, restrict or otherwise affect the terms and
conditions that could be included in the agreement with the subject.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.59.14 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.99.02 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.80.63 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Information Gathered
by : |
HTL |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
TPT |
SCORE & RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
SCORE FACTORS |
RANGE |
POINTS |
|
HISTORY |
1~10 |
4 |
|
PAID-UP CAPITAL |
1~10 |
3 |
|
OPERATING SCALE |
1~10 |
3 |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION |
|
|
|
--BUSINESS SCALE |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--PROFITABILIRY |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--LIQUIDITY |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--LEVERAGE |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--RESERVES |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--CREDIT LINES |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--MARGINS |
-5~5 |
-- |
|
DEMERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--BANK CHARGES |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--LITIGATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--OTHER ADVERSE INFORMATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
MERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--SOLE DISTRIBUTORSHIP |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--EXPORT ACTIVITIES |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--AFFILIATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--LISTED |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--OTHER MERIT FACTORS |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--RBI |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--EPF |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
TOTAL |
|
28 |
This score serves as a reference to assess
SC’s credit risk and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated
from a composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of
this report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated
through %) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment record
(10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend (10%) Operational size
(10%)
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest capability
for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.