|
Report Date : |
28.11.2014 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
YOSI GLICK DIAMONDS (2003) LTD. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
1 Jabotinsky Street Diamond Exchange, Maccabi Bldg. Ramat Gan 5252001 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
1969 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Dealers, processors, importers, exporters and marketers of
diamonds |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
60 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Unknown |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – June 1, 2014
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.03.2014) |
Current Rating (01.06.2014) |
|
|
A2 |
A2 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
|
Source
: CIA |
YOSI GLICK DIAMONDS
(2003) LTD.
Telephone 972 3 575 35 98
Fax 972 3 575 40 99
Email: info@glickdiamonds.com
1 Jabotinsky Street
Diamond Exchange, Maccabi Bldg.
Ramat Gan 5252001 Israel
A private limited company, incorporated as per file No. 51-342248-5 on the 16.06.2003, continuing business activities which began originally in 1969.
Authorized share capital of NIS 39,100.00, divided into:-
39,100 ordinary shares of NIS 1.00 each,
of which 100 shares amounting to NIS 100.00 were issued.
1. Yossi Glick, 99%,
2. Mrs. Nurit Glick, 1%.
Yossi Glick.
Dealers, processors, importers, exporters and marketers of diamonds, in a wide range of shapes, colors and sizes from clean to Rejection/Boart goods, from 200 stones p/ct to 10cts.
Purchasing is from import and from local suppliers.
Among local suppliers: DIASTONE.
Operating from premises, in 1 Jabotinsky Street, Diamond Exchange,
Maccabi Building (17th Floor, room No. 1738), Ramat Gan, and from
branches in Antwerp (Belgium),
Guangzhou (China), Mumbai and Surat (India) and South Africa.
Having reportedly some 60 employees.
Financial data not forthcoming, but considered to be financially solid.
Subject is a Diamond Trading Company (DCT) Sightholder from DE BEERS.
There are 5 charges for unlimited amounts registered on the company's assets (financial assets and fixed assets), in favor of Mizrahi Tefahot Ltd. and Union Bank of Israel Ltd. Charges placed in 2003, December 2011, November 2013 and September 2014.
Sales data not forthcoming.
GLICK DIAMONDS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, branch in India.
SHAI DIAMONDS BVBA, branch in Belgium.
Union Bank of Israel Ltd., Ramat Gan Branch (No. 062), Ramat Gan, accounts No. 93725/87 and No. 93725/04.
A check with the Central Banks' database did not reveal anything detrimental on subject’s a/m accounts.
Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd., Diamond Exchange Business Center Branch (No. 466), Ramat Gan.
Nothing unfavorable learned.
Despite our efforts, we were unable to speak with subject's officials, as they were always unavailable. We left messages which so far remain unanswered.
This is a veteran and well-known diamond business.
Israel's diamond industry remarked on impressive growth in almost all trade parameters in 2013, from the data by Israel's Diamond Administration at the Ministry of Economics: Net export of polished diamonds rose by 11.6% in value terms from 2012, reaching US$6.2 billion. The market has been volatile in recent years: the branch –in Israel as well as globally- experienced its worst depression in the 2nd half of 2008 and 2009 due to the global economic crisis (almost an entire freeze and collapse in sales of about 70% in the peak of the crisis), then recovered in 2010 and fell again in 2012 (net export fell 23% in 2012 from 2011).
Net export of polished diamonds continued to grow in the 1st half of 2014 with 6% rise in value terms compared to 2013 (fell 6.7% in karat terms), reaching US$3.55 billion.
Net rough diamond exports totaled US$2.9 billion in 2013, a mere rise from 2012, and totaled US$1.75 billion in the 1stH 2014 (up 6% and 11.6% in value and in karat terms, respectively).
Net imports of polished diamonds remained in 2013 similar level as 2012 (after drop by 25% in value in 2012 from 2011), totaling US$4.3 billion, and in the 1stH 2014 reached US$2.05 billion (up 0.9% in value and 5.7% in karat). Net rough diamonds imports rose 4% in 2013 summing up at US$4 billion, and summed at US$ 2.2 billion in the 1stH of 2014 (3% rise in value, 10% fall in karat terms).
The United States continued to be Israel’s major market for polished diamonds, accounting for 37% of the market in 2013 (35% in 2013). Hong Kong is the next largest market with 27% of exports, with Switzerland accounting for 9.3%, Belgium 7.3%, and India accounting for 2.3% of Israel's polished diamond export.
According to the President of the Israeli Diamonds Association, in 2010 the trade in the local diamond sector rolled annual turnover of US$ 25 billion while total debt to the banks stands on US$ 1.5 billion, down from US$ 2.4 billion in the eve of the global crisis. The Ministry of Economics also assisted the local diamond exporters by providing bank guarantees in total scope of NIS 1 billion.
In February 2009, Israel was ranked as the world’s largest exporter of cut diamonds, followed by India, Belgium and South Africa.
Local diamond sector employs some 20,000 persons.
An affair of an underground bank shocked the local diamond branch, after in late January 2012 Police raided the Diamond Exchange (after a long undercover operation), arrested several individuals for investigation, caught diamonds and various assets worth NIS millions, and blocked several bank accounts. It is suspected that a group of people, including diamond dealers, run an illegal bank in the Diamond Exchange compound for loans, money transfer abroad based on fictitious transactions and exchange in volume of NIS 1 billion for several years.
The affair led to several of reported bankruptcies of local diamond firms, a decrease of up to 70% in transactions in 2012, frozen bank accounts, and for a while to paralysis (especially in purchase of raw diamonds) due to uncertainty among local and foreign dealers.
In March 2012 the Police decided to lower the profile of the investigation for a while a result of the big pressure from the diamond branch (to stop the continuing damage inflicted) and the Government (who is losing US$ hundred millions from decrease in tax collection). In November 2012 the Police and Tax Authorities recommended on indictments against the 25 suspects in the affair, among them diamond dealers, for the said suspicions and obstruction of the investigation.
In June 2013 it was reported that the Police resumed its raids on the diamonds branch, and although names of suspects were not released, sources said that it is also related to the above underground bank affair. In parallel, it is also reported that the Tax Authorities and diamonds dealers' representatives are trying to reach an arrangement for past debts.
In July 2014 3 indictments were filed to the Tel Aviv District Court against central defendants in the affair, who provided foreign currency services to the "underground bank" (not against diamond dealers at this stage), for felonies of money laundering and tax evasion in volumes of US$ millions.
Notwithstanding the refusal to disclose details, considered
good for trade engagements.
Note: Since February 2013 Israel Post has started using a new area code method of 7 digits (the old method of 5 digits is no longer valid).
DIAMOND INDUSTRY – INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world as the birthplace
for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of diamonds but history
says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in India. Diamond
production in India can be traced back to almost 8th Century B.C.
India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th Century
when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of S.
Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was possible only due to
combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian workforce and the
untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires, supported by
progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses derives its
importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations which operate
in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business enterprises include
spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction costs, small,
nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage and
philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on many fronts including
higher standard of corporate governance, long-term performance – focused
strategies, modern management and technology.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with some medium and
large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious import – export,
inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In the process,
several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees. They mostly
diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and capital
markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th October 2010 is as
under –
-
Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council in its statistical data has
shown the export of polished diamonds to have increase by 28 % in February
2013. Compared to $ 1.4 bn worth of polished diamond export in February, 2012,
India exported $ 1.84 billion worth of polished diamonds in February 2013. A
senior executive of GJEPC said, “Export of cut and polished diamonds started
falling month-wise after the imposition of 2 % of import duty on the polished
diamonds. But February, 2013 has given a new ray of hope to the industry as the
export of polished diamonds has actually increased by 28 %. It means the
industry is on the track of recovery and round tripping of diamonds has
stopped completely.” Demand has started coming from the US, the UK, Japan and
China. India’s polished diamond export is expected to cross $ 21 bn in 2013-14.
-
The banking sector has started exercising restraint while following
prudent risk management norms when lending money to gems and jewellery sector.
This follows the implementation of Basel III accord – a global voluntary
regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy, stress testing and market
liquidity.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.61.87 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.97.69 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.77.37 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Analysis Done by
: |
RAS |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
NIS |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to
overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
|
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this
report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through
%) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.