|
Report Date : |
22.10.2014 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
MAXHEAP TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED |
|
|
|
|
Registered
Office : |
#298, 299, SGR Towers, 7th Cross, Domlur Layout, Bangalore
– 560071, Karnataka |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
India |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as
on) : |
31.03.2013 |
|
|
|
|
Date of
Incorporation : |
17.04.2008 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
08-046105 |
|
|
|
|
Capital
Investment / Paid-up Capital : |
Rs. 17.436 Millions |
|
|
|
|
CIN No.: [Company Identification
No.] |
U72200KA2008PTC046105 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Liability Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business
: |
The Main Object of the company is of providing Online communication and
management tools to residential housing societies in India and maintenance of
websites for this purpose. |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees
: |
Information declined by the management. |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B (33) |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Maximum Credit Limit : |
USD 90000 |
|
|
|
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Slow but correct |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
|
|
|
|
Comments : |
Subject is an established company having moderate track. The company possesses a moderate financial profile marked by
acceptable networth base and comfortable capital structure backed by zero gearing
along with sufficient cash balance during the year under review. Management has witnessed an increased revenue from its small scale of
operations, whereas has reported consecutive losses which may affect the
liquidity profile during FY 13. However, trade relations seem to be fair. Business is active. Payment
terms are reported as slow but correct. In view of technical expertise and experience of the promoters, the
company can be considered for business dealings with caution. |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – June 1, 2014
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.03.2014) |
Current Rating (01.06.2014) |
|
India |
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
INDIAN ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
N E W S
Verdict Implications
: Apex court order may alter coal import dynamics. Traders go slow on talks
over coal supply contracts, uncertainty over cancellation of blocks weigh on
stocks.
Recent arrest of the
Chennai head of the Registrar of Companies, the ministry of corporate affairs
arm that ensures that companies file all the information required by the
Companies Act is the latest manifestation of a messy fight between a father and
his adopted son for the control of Rs 40000 mn business empire. The Central
Bureau of Investigation arrested Manumeethi Cholan after he accepted Rs 10
lakhs as bribe from M A M Ramaswamy, a CBI official said.
Central Bureau of
Investigation books Electrotherm for cheating Central Bank of Rs 4360 mn.
Infosys maintains
revenue guidance. COO Rao says attrition still an area of concern and it would
take a few more quarters to bring down levels to 13-15 %.
DHL to invest
Euro 100 mn in India over next 2 years. The firm has chosen India to pilot its
e-commerce business model for the Asia-Pacific region.
Blackstone may buy
stake in BlueRidge SEZ in line with the fund’s real estate strategy in India.
Kingfisher Airlines
Ltd grounded in October 2012 under the weight of heavy debt and accumulated
losses, recently approached the Delhi high court for relief in two separate
cases. The airline challenged a notice by Punjab & National Bank alleging
that It had wilfully defaulted on Rs 7700 mn of loans and sought more time to
comply with the requirements under the listing agreements with the Stock
Exchanges.
OnMobile likely to
sack another 300 employees. The lay-offs follow a spate of senior-level exits
over the past two years, starting with of its founder. The overall lay-offs
could number around 600 and are driven by the need to cut costs, says a former
employee.
RBI DEFAULTERS’ LIST STATUS
Subject’s name is not enlisted as a defaulter
in the publicly available RBI Defaulters’ list.
EPF (Employee Provident Fund) DEFAULTERS’ LIST STATUS
Subject’s name is not enlisted as a defaulter
in the publicly available EPF (Employee Provident Fund) Defaulters’ list as of
31-03-2014.
INFORMATION DENIED
Management Non-co-operative (91-80-49374000)
LOCATIONS
|
Registered Office : |
#298, 299, SGR Towers, 7th Cross, Domlur Layout, Bangalore
– 560071, Karnataka, India |
|
Tel. No.: |
91-80-49374084 |
|
Fax No.: |
Not Available |
|
E-Mail : |
|
|
Website : |
DIRECTORS
AS ON 30.09.2013
|
Name : |
Mr. Subrata Mitra |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Designation : |
Additional Director |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Address : |
A 401, Mantri Elegance Banneghatta Road, Bangalre – 560076, Karnataka,
India |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
29.09.1965 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date of Appointment : |
30.09.2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DIN No. : |
00570124 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Directorship :
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name : |
Mr. Lalit Mangal |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Designation : |
Whole-time Director |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Address : |
Flat No. 002, Block 16, Sun City Apartments, Sarjapur Junction, Outer
Ring Road, Bangalore – 560102, Karnataka, India |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
12.10.1984 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date of Appointment : |
24.04.2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DIN No. : |
02122750 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name : |
Mr. Sumit Jain |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Designation : |
Whole-time Director |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Address : |
Flat No. 101, Golden Corner Apartments, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore –
560035, Karnataka, India |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
13.06.1984 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date of Appointment : |
24.04.2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DIN No. : |
02122751 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Directorship :
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name : |
Mr. Lee Jared Fixel |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Designation : |
Director |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Address : |
101 S F T Lauderdale Beach Blvd, Unit 2005, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316,
United states of America |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date of Birth/Age : |
23.02.1980 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date of Appointment : |
06.09.2011 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DIN No. : |
02635091 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Directorship :
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
As on 30.09.2013
Equity Shares
|
Names of Shareholders |
No. of Shares |
|
Lalit Mangal |
24515 |
|
Sumit Jain |
24515 |
|
Vikas Malpani |
4260 |
|
Boddapaty Anand |
805 |
|
Sameer |
320 |
|
Nandini Hirianniah |
320 |
|
Accel India Venture ll (Mauritius Limited) |
100 |
|
Tiger Global Six India ll Holdings |
100 |
|
Total |
54935 |
Preference Shares
|
Names of
Shareholders |
No.
of Shares |
|
Accel India Venture ll (Mauritius Limited) |
51333 |
|
Tiger Global Six India ll Holdings |
76846 |
|
Total |
128179 |
As on 30.09.2013
Equity Share Break up (Percentage of Total Equity)
|
Category |
Percentage of Holding |
|
Foreign holdings( Foreign institutional
investor(s), Foreign companie(s) Foreign financial institution(s),
Non-resident Indian(s) or Overseas Corporate bodies or Others |
0.36 |
|
Directors or relatives of Directors |
89.25 |
|
Other |
10.39 |
|
Total |
100.00 |

BUSINESS DETAILS
|
Line of Business : |
The Main Object of the company is of providing Online communication
and management tools to residential housing societies in India and maintenance
of websites for this purpose. |
GENERAL INFORMATION
|
Suppliers : |
|
|
|
|
|
Customers : |
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
Information declined by the management. |
|
|
|
|
Bankers : |
Not Available |
|
|
|
|
Facilities : |
Not Available |
|
|
|
|
Banking Relations
: |
-- |
|
|
|
|
Auditors : |
|
|
Name : |
Ganapath Raj and Company Chartered Accountants |
|
Address : |
F- 113, 2A, Central Chambers,2nd Floor, 2nd Main
Road, Gandhinagar, Bangalore – 560009, Karnataka, India |
|
Tel. No.: |
91-80-22262821 / 22256760 |
|
E-Mail : |
|
|
PAN No.: |
AAHFG7712L |
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
As on 30.09.2013
Authorised Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500200 |
Equity Shares |
Rs.2/- each |
Rs. 1.000 Millions |
|
21467 |
Preference Shares |
Rs. 478/- each |
Rs. 10.261 Millions |
|
156058 |
Preference Shares |
Rs. 100/- each |
Rs. 15.606 Millions |
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. 26.867
Millions |
Issued, Subscribed & Paid-up Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54935 |
Equity Shares |
Rs.2/- each |
Rs. 0.110 Millions |
|
21467 |
Preference Shares |
Rs. 478/- each |
Rs. 10.261 Millions |
|
106712 |
Preference Shares |
Rs. 100/- each |
Rs. 10.671 Millions |
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. 21.042
Millions |
As on 31.03.2013
Authorised Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500000 |
Equity Shares |
Rs.2/- each |
Rs. 1.000 Million |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued, Subscribed & Paid-up Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54735 |
Equity Shares |
Rs.2/- each |
Rs. 0.109 Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL DATA
[all figures are
in Rupees Millions]
ABRIDGED BALANCE
SHEET
|
SOURCES OF FUNDS |
31.03.2013 |
31.03.2012 |
31.03.2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
(1)Shareholders' Funds |
|
|
|
|
(a) Share Capital |
17.436 |
17.436 |
10.371 |
|
(b) Reserves &
Surplus |
14.338 |
111.938 |
-4.342 |
|
(c) Money received
against share warrants |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Share Application
money pending allotment |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
Total Shareholders’ Funds
(1) + (2) |
31.774 |
129.374 |
6.029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Non-Current
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
(a) long-term borrowings |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
(b) Deferred tax
liabilities (Net) |
0.397 |
0.085 |
0.022 |
|
(c) Other long term
liabilities |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
(d) long-term provisions |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
Total Non-current
Liabilities (3) |
0.397 |
0.085 |
0.022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
(a) Short term borrowings |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
(b) Trade payables |
3.615 |
1.143 |
0.486 |
|
(c) Other current liabilities |
2.205 |
0.823 |
0.910 |
|
(d) Short-term provisions |
11.795 |
3.932 |
0.108 |
|
Total Current Liabilities
(4) |
17.615 |
5.898 |
1.504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
49.786 |
135.357 |
7.555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
II.
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
(1) Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
(a) Fixed Assets |
|
|
|
|
(i) Tangible assets |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
(ii) Intangible Assets |
6.806 |
1.140 |
0.383 |
|
(iii) Capital
work-in-progress |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
(iv) Intangible assets under
development |
9.269 |
6.608 |
3.464 |
|
(b) Non-current
Investments |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
(c) Deferred tax assets
(net) |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
(d) Long-term Loan and Advances |
5.176 |
1.129 |
0.300 |
|
(e) Other Non-current
assets |
2.698 |
6.787 |
0.000 |
|
Total Non-Current Assets |
23.949 |
15.664 |
4.147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Current assets |
|
|
|
|
(a) Current investments |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
(b) Inventories |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
(c) Trade receivables |
3.198 |
1.201 |
1.922 |
|
(d) Cash and cash
equivalents |
22.051 |
118.436 |
1.427 |
|
(e) Short-term loans and
advances |
0.462 |
0.042 |
0.059 |
|
(f) Other current assets |
0.126 |
0.014 |
0.000 |
|
Total Current Assets |
25.837 |
119.693 |
3.408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
49.786 |
135.357 |
7.555 |
PROFIT & LOSS
ACCOUNT
|
|
PARTICULARS |
31.03.2013 |
31.03.2012 |
31.03.2011 |
|
|
SALES |
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
48.235 |
7.686 |
7.686 |
|
|
Other Income |
6.274 |
7.035 |
NA |
|
|
TOTAL (A) |
54.509 |
14.721 |
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
Employees benefits
expense |
88.909 |
20.453 |
|
|
|
Other expenses |
61.509 |
11.612 |
|
|
|
TOTAL (B) |
150.418 |
32.065 |
25.030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
PROFIT/ (LOSS) BEFORE INTEREST, TAX, DEPRECIATION AND
AMORTISATION (C) |
(95.909) |
(17.344) |
(17.344) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
FINANCIAL EXPENSES (D) |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFIT / (LOSS) BEFORE TAX,
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTISATION (C-D) (E) |
(95.909) |
(17.344) |
(17.344) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less/ Add |
DEPRECIATION/
AMORTISATION (F) |
1.378 |
0.389 |
0.389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFIT/ (LOSS) BEFORE TAX (E-F) (G) |
(97.287) |
(17.733) |
(17.733) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
TAX (H) |
0.312 |
0.063 |
0.063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFIT/ (LOSS) AFTER TAX
(G-H) (I) |
(97.599) |
(17.796) |
(17.796) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings / (Loss) Per
Share (Rs.) |
(1783.13) |
(325.15) |
(97.19) |
KEY RATIOS
|
PARTICULARS |
|
31.03.2013 |
31.03.2012 |
31.03.2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAT / Total Income |
(%) |
(179.05) |
(120.89) |
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit Margin (PBT/Sales) |
(%) |
(201.69) |
(230.72) |
(230.72) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Total Assets (PBT/Total Assets} |
(%) |
(240.11) |
(13.77) |
(433.46) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Investment (ROI) (PBT/Networth) |
|
(3.06) |
(0.14) |
(2.94) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Equity Ratio (Total Debt /Networth) |
|
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Ratio (Current Asset/Current Liability) |
|
1.47 |
20.29 |
2.27 |
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
[all figures are
in Rupees Millions]
DEBT EQUITY RATIO
|
Particular |
31.03.2011 |
31.03.2012 |
31.03.2013 |
|
|
(Rs. In Millions) |
(Rs. In Millions) |
(Rs. In Millions) |
|
Share Capital |
10.371 |
17.436 |
17.436 |
|
Reserves & Surplus |
(4.342) |
111.938 |
14.338 |
|
Net worth |
6.029 |
129.374 |
31.774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
long-term borrowings |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
Short term borrowings |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
Total borrowings |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
Debt/Equity ratio |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |

YEAR-ON-YEAR GROWTH
|
Year on Year Growth |
31.03.2011 |
31.03.2012 |
31.03.2013 |
|
|
(Rs. In Millions) |
(Rs. In Millions) |
(Rs. In Millions) |
|
Sales |
7.686 |
7.686 |
48.235 |
|
|
|
0.000 |
527.570 |

NET PROFIT MARGIN
|
Net Profit Margin |
31.03.2011 |
31.03.2012 |
31.03.2013 |
|
|
(Rs. In Millions) |
(Rs. In Millions) |
(Rs. In Millions) |
|
Sales |
7.686 |
7.686 |
48.235 |
|
Profit |
(17.796) |
(17.796) |
(97.599) |
|
|
(231.54%) |
(231.54%) |
(202.34%) |

LOCAL AGENCY FURTHER INFORMATION
|
Sr. No. |
Check List by Info Agents |
Available in
Report (Yes / No) |
|
1] |
Year of Establishment |
Yes |
|
2] |
Locality of the firm |
Yes |
|
3] |
Constitutions of the firm |
Yes |
|
4] |
Premises details |
No |
|
5] |
Type of Business |
Yes |
|
6] |
Line of Business |
Yes |
|
7] |
Promoter's background |
Yes |
|
8] |
No. of employees |
No |
|
9] |
Name of person contacted |
No |
|
10] |
Designation of contact
person |
No |
|
11] |
Turnover of firm for last
three years |
Yes |
|
12] |
Profitability for last
three years |
Yes |
|
13] |
Reasons for variation
<> 20% |
-------------------- |
|
14] |
Estimation for coming
financial year |
No |
|
15] |
Capital in the business |
Yes |
|
16] |
Details of sister
concerns |
No |
|
17] |
Major suppliers |
Yes |
|
18] |
Major customers |
Yes |
|
19] |
Payments terms |
No |
|
20] |
Export / Import details
(if applicable) |
No |
|
21] |
Market information |
---------------------- |
|
22] |
Litigations that the firm
/ promoter involved in |
---------------------- |
|
23] |
Banking Details |
No |
|
24] |
Banking facility details |
No |
|
25] |
Conduct of the banking
account |
---------------------- |
|
26] |
Buyer visit details |
----------------------- |
|
27] |
Financials, if provided |
Yes |
|
28] |
Incorporation details, if
applicable |
Yes |
|
29] |
Last accounts filed at
ROC |
Yes |
|
30] |
Major Shareholders, if
available |
Yes |
|
31] |
Date of Birth of Proprietor/Partner/Director,
if available |
Yes |
|
32] |
PAN of
Proprietor/Partner/Director, if available |
No |
|
33] |
Voter ID No of
Proprietor/Partner/Director, if available |
No |
|
34] |
External Agency Rating,
if available |
No |
PRESS RELEASE:
Business Standard
Building bridges
between neighbours
An apartment
management platform and a community-driven approach have helped CommonFloor
break away from the clutter of property portals
An agitation by the residents of a housing society in Bangalore following a ruptured water pipeline in their complex saw three friends, all in their mid-20s, pool their technical expertise and savings on an online platform for apartment owners to address common issues.
In 2007, convinced they had a viable business idea at hand, the trio - Sumit
Jain, Lalit Mangal and Vikas Malpani - gave up lucrative jobs at multinational
companies to start their own venture. "We just wanted to create a product
that would help apartment owners manage their property better and facilitate
daily chores," says Jain, co-founder and chief executive of maxHeap
Technologies, the company that runs CommonFloor.com. In December 2007, the trio
kicked off Common Floor, three months after it was conceptualised, as a free
collaborative apartment management software platform, and test-marketed it
across 20 apartment societies in the city.
Cut to April 2013, Bangalore-based maxHeap Technologies runs a Rs 100.000
Millions business, with about 60,000 housing societies on its apartment
management platform. Its revenues rose five-fold compared with Rs 20.000 Millions
in 2011-12. Through the last two years, CommonFloor.com has morphed into one of
the fastest growing property portals in the country, facilitating buying,
selling and renting of properties, a segment that accounts for almost all the
company's revenue.
What sets it apart is its apartment management platform is offered free to
registered property owners. "This is akin to the Google model, in which
the platform is free for the end-user (property owners), while the business
customer pays for the service," says Jain, who claims to have about 1,000
paid customers.
The company's new office in Domlur has been a bee-hive of activity, with scores
of interviewees fleeting in and out; the start-up recruited 100-odd employees
through the last six months. This followed a second round of funding by two
venture capital funds, Accel Partners and Tiger Global, in October 2012.
CommonFloor provides
members regular updates on maintenance, track payment dues and complaints.
Members can search for a plumber, carpenter or maid; create subgroups based on
shared interests such as gardening, car pool or yoga. They keep themselves
updated through email and SMS alerts, while a mobile app keeps neighbours
connected on the go. The platform also helps resident welfare associations
manage their expenses and accounts online.
This has created a growing community of property owners (five-million strong),
a ready market for service providers and a database for buyers, real estate
agents and developers to tap into.
Consider the case of Sandeep Gupta, joint secretary of the resident welfare
association of The White House, a 165-flat complex in a tiny Gurgaon suburb.
Gupta was introduced to the concept by a few residents who had chanced upon the
platform in another city. "The society has been using the platform for
six-odd months, maintaining accounts, sharing information with members and
regularly updating the membership list," he says.
Jain says, according to research by the firm, at any point, typically, 40 per
cent of property owners in a society scout for tenants, creating a constant
churn of activity and deals. This flux creates a steady stream of visitors to
the real estate portal. The visitors include prospective buyers, sellers,
tenants, property brokers and developers. For Vinod Advani, vice-president,
Maangalya Developers, a prominent Bangalore-based realtor, the platform offers
a better conversion rate than most other property portals. "Their biggest
strength is they are more end user- and owner-oriented," says Advani.
Hard knocks
Building the apartment management platform was perhaps the easiest part of the venture. Getting societies to use the platform, generating user-oriented content, and building a scalable business model around it was the difficult part. "We knew we had a winner in our hands, as there was nothing like this in the market," says Jain. But success didn't come without some hard knocks.
After giving up their cushy jobs, Jain and Mangal, software engineers from
IIT-Roorkee and ex-colleagues at Oracle India, and Malpani, who had a stint at
SAP Labs, operated out of their houses for about a year. It was their
cumulative savings pool of Rs 0.500 -1.000 Millions that saw them through the
early months. "We were prepared for a long haul," says Jain.
It took the trio six months of intensive word-of-mouth marketing, with help
from friends and family, to rope in 700-odd societies. A four-month stint at
the business accelerator programme of The Morpheus, a start-up accelerator, in
mid-2008, came in handy. Sameer Guglani, co-founder, The Morpheus, and his team
helped fine-tune the business model. "At that point, they operated within
a closed user group. We looked at ways to make their database of property
owners more publicly available and reach out to a larger market set," says
Guglani.
Then, venture fund Accel Partners stepped in. It provided them a small office
space in the heart of Bangalore and, in early 2009, invested in the company.
"Only when we started operating out of an office did we realise the power
of working together under one roof," says Jain.
After about a year of existence, the start-up started taking shape. The team
strength grew from three to 30 by 2010, 300 in 2012 and 400 by this April.
Through the last two years, the leadership team grew from three to one that had
10 members. "Hiring the senior management team was a challenge," says
Jain. Today, salaries account for 70 per cent of operational expenses; the rest
is spent on rentals and other operations. "We kept our cash burn low by
relying largely on word-of-mouth marketing," says Jain. But that might
have to change, as the start-up scales up beyond Bangalore and prepares to take
on seasoned competitors such as 99acres and MagicBricks. New-age niche
consumer-focused property portals such as Housing.co.in, too, are getting their
act in place.
Entering enemy territory
In 2009, maxHeap Technologies launched its real estate portal, CommonFloor.com. Initially, this was like any other property portal, listing properties for sale and rental, offering developers online space to market their properties, or agents to list properties. However a growing community of registered users of the company's apartment management platform created a steady flow of traffic to the portal.
The advertising-driven revenue model gained traction, as the size of the
community doubled from about 30,000 to about 60,000. Jain, Mangal and Malpani
have set a revenue target of about Rs 125 crore through the next two years.
Jain says the venture is already profitable. He, however, declines to share
details of investment and profitability, citing non-disclosure agreements with
investors.
But classified advertising is a space where rivals such as 99acres and
MagicBricks have a head start. The advertising market for real estate portals
is estimated to attract Rs 3000.000 – 4000.000 Millions a year. A few existing
CommonFloor customers such as Advani of Maangalya concede the portal could do
with some improvement in marketing properties to prospective buyers.
"Having access to property owners will provide advantage to CommonFloor in
the rental market. For purchase of property, access to builders and agents
would have to be built, just as other property classified players are
doing," says Alok Mittal, managing director, Canaan Partner, a venture
fund that has invested in Indiaproperty.com, a competing portal.
Bangalore is the only market in which CommonFloor claims to have a lead.
"Bangalore is our bread-and-butter market," concedes Malpani, head of
marketing and communities. It ranks third or fourth in other markets, primarily
due to low brand awareness. Malpani says through the last six months, the
company has set up marketing offices in eight cities across the country. Also,
about a third of the headcount is now directed at marketing and sales-related
activities.
As the business scales up, the challenge would be to retain its end-user focus.
"CommonFloor's USP has been its B-to-C focus, with its community approach.
They should not fall prey to competitive pressures while serving the needs of
the paying customers," cautions Guglani of The Morpheus.
With several niche property portals targeting specific market segments such as
bachelor pads, paying-guest accommodation for women, etc, it remains to be seen
whether CommonFloor would be able to retain its focus on societal concerns, as
they grapple with commercial pressures.
FACT BOX
Area of Business: Apartment
management software & realty portal
Revenue: Rs
10 crore (FY12-13)
Target: Rs 125 crore by 2014-15
HOW COMMONFLOOR'S APARTMENT MANAGEMENT
PLATFORM HELPS...
..Residents...
...Associations...
...Service
providers/vendors...
EXPERT TAKE
Incumbent leaders in the real estate portal space in India are six to eight
years old, and they haven't changed much. They are just a listing site for
brokers; usually, all you can find on the portal is the number of a broker. The
market is very large and, recently, a lot of new players have emerged. These
include Housing.co.in and the likes of Quickr. Most players have relied on
media spend to pass their names to users. CommonFloor has taken a different
route -they have a free give-away software for housing societies. Thus, they
get their traffic without media spend.
However, merely getting users to your portal free of cost might not be enough.
A real estate portal has to try to disrupt the market status quo. Nobody is
giving you a social connect to your landlord and tenant, something that would
add more trust to the transaction; nobody is saying 'we will eliminate brokers
completely'; nobody is giving enough photos and research data online; and
nobody has a solid mobile app. Some new players have come up with brave
attempts and only those would survive in the long run. Just being a listing
site such as Justdial wouldn't be enough in the long run. CommonFloor has to
translate its initial advantage through its community software to more
value-add for its customers.
Anand Lunia, founder-partner, India Quotient, a super angel fund that has
invested in two-start ups in the property portal space
VIEW INDEX OF
CHARGES: No Charges Exist for Company
CMT REPORT (Corruption, Money Laundering & Terrorism]
The Public Notice information has been collected from various sources
including but not limited to: The Courts,
1] INFORMATION ON
DESIGNATED PARTY
No exist designating subject or any of its beneficial owners,
controlling shareholders or senior officers as terrorist or terrorist
organization or whom notice had been received that all financial transactions
involving their assets have been blocked or convicted, found guilty or against
whom a judgement or order had been entered in a proceedings for violating
money-laundering, anti-corruption or bribery or international economic or
anti-terrorism sanction laws or whose assets were seized, blocked, frozen or
ordered forfeited for violation of money laundering or international
anti-terrorism laws.
2] Court Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that subject is
or was the subject of any formal or informal allegations, prosecutions or other
official proceeding for making any prohibited payments or other improper
payments to government officials for engaging in prohibited transactions or
with designated parties.
3] Asset Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that the property or assets of the subject
are derived from criminal conduct or a prohibited transaction.
4] Record on Financial
Crime :
Charges or conviction
registered against subject: None
5] Records on Violation of
Anti-Corruption Laws :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
6] Records on Int’l
Anti-Money Laundering Laws/Standards :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
7] Criminal Records
No
available information exist that suggest that subject or any of its principals
have been formally charged or convicted by a competent governmental authority
for any financial crime or under any formal investigation by a competent
government authority for any violation of anti-corruption laws or international
anti-money laundering laws or standard.
8] Affiliation with
Government :
No record
exists to suggest that any director or indirect owners, controlling
shareholders, director, officer or employee of the company is a government
official or a family member or close business associate of a Government
official.
9] Compensation Package :
Our market
survey revealed that the amount of compensation sought by the subject is fair
and reasonable and comparable to compensation paid to others for similar
services.
10] Press Report :
No press reports / filings exists on
the subject.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MIRA INFORM as part of its Due Diligence do provide comments on Corporate
Governance to identify management and governance. These factors often have been
predictive and in some cases have created vulnerabilities to credit
deterioration.
Our Governance Assessment focuses principally on the interactions
between a company’s management, its Board of Directors, Shareholders and other
financial stakeholders.
CONTRAVENTION
Subject is not known to have contravened any existing local laws,
regulations or policies that prohibit, restrict or otherwise affect the terms
and conditions that could be included in the agreement with the subject.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs. 61.29 |
|
|
1 |
Rs. 99.15 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs. 78.58 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Information Gathered
by : |
PRT |
|
|
|
|
Analysis Done by
: |
SUB |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
TRU |
SCORE & RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
SCORE FACTORS |
RANGE |
POINTS |
|
HISTORY |
1~10 |
4 |
|
PAID-UP CAPITAL |
1~10 |
4 |
|
OPERATING SCALE |
1~10 |
3 |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION |
|
|
|
--BUSINESS SCALE |
1~10 |
4 |
|
--PROFITABILIRY |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--LIQUIDITY |
1~10 |
4 |
|
--LEVERAGE |
1~10 |
4 |
|
--RESERVES |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--CREDIT LINES |
1~10 |
4 |
|
--MARGINS |
-5~5 |
-- |
|
DEMERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--BANK CHARGES |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--LITIGATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--OTHER ADVERSE INFORMATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
MERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--SOLE DISTRIBUTORSHIP |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--EXPORT ACTIVITIES |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--AFFILIATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--LISTED |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--OTHER MERIT FACTORS |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
DEFAULTER |
|
|
|
--RBI |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--EPF |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
TOTAL |
|
33 |
This score serves as a reference to assess
SC’s credit risk and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated
from a composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of
this report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated
through %) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment record
(10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend (10%) Operational size
(10%)
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest capability
for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.