|
Report Date : |
05.09.2014 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
GERRESHEIMER GLASS INC. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
|
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
09.03.1987 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Corporation – Profit |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Subject is engaged in designs, develops, manufactures, and markets
various glass products for pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and scientific research
markets. It offers pharmaceutical serum bottles, screw thread bottles,
moulded bottles, pharmaceutical packaging, laboratory glassware, glass
tubing, and rod products. |
|
|
|
|
No of Employees : |
2,100 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Slow but correct |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – June 01, 2014
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.03.2014) |
Current Rating (01.06.2014) |
|
|
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low Risk |
A2 |
|
Moderate Low Risk |
B1 |
|
Moderate Risk |
B2 |
|
Moderate High Risk |
C1 |
|
High Risk |
C2 |
|
Very High Risk |
D |
UNITED STATES - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
The
|
Source
: CIA |
GERRESHEIMER GLASS
INC.
Address:
Telephone: +1
856-692-3600
Fax: +1 856-692-0280
Website: www.gerresheimer.com
Corporate ID#: 2119667
State:
Judicial form: Corporation – Profit
Date incorporated: March
9, 1987
Stock: -
Value: -
Name of manager: UWE
ROEHRHOFF
Business:
Gerresheimer Glass Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and markets
various glass products for pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and scientific
research markets. It offers pharmaceutical serum bottles, screw thread bottles,
moulded bottles, pharmaceutical packaging, laboratory glassware, glass tubing,
and rod products. In addition, the company offers ampoules, cartridges, vials,
molded bottles, and specialty glass products.
The company was formerly known as Kimble Glass, Inc. and changed its
name to Gerresheimer Glass Inc. in April 2007.
The company was founded in 1901 and is based in
The Company is also doing business as KIMBLE GLASS INC
Exports to South and
Office of the Foreign
Assets Control (OFAC):
The company is not listed on the OFAC list.
The Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List is a publication of OFAC
which lists individuals and organizations with whom
EIN: 22-2784102
Staff: 2,100
Operations & branches:
At the headquarters, we
find a large factory, warehouse and office, owned.
The Company maintains other facilities located:
91,
Shareholders:
GERRESHEIMER AG
Benrather Strasse 18-20
Gerresheimer AG manufactures and sells specialty products made of glass
and plastic primarily for the pharma and healthcare industries.
It operates in four divisions: Tubular Glass, Plastic Systems, Moulded
Glass, and Life Science Research.
The Tubular Glass division produces and sells glass products, including
vials, ampoules, cartridges, and syringes; and borosilicate tubes as
intermediate products.
The Plastic Systems division offers plastic packaging for liquid and
solid medications comprising application and dosage systems, such as
eye-droppers and nasal sprays; and containers for tablets and powder, as well
as tablet containers and closures, PET bottles, and nebulizers.
This division also provides medical plastic systems, such as inhalers
for treating respiratory diseases, lancet magazines, insulin pen systems for
diabetics, and disposable products for laboratory and molecular diagnostics.
The Moulded Glass division produces glass containers, and pharmaceutical
packaging in flint and amber glass, which include injection bottles, dropper
bottles, and syrup bottles. It also provides flacons and jars for perfumes,
deodorants, skincare, and wellness products to cosmetics industry; and individual
miniature bottles for spirits to food and beverage industry, as well as
produces opal glass.
The Life Science Research division offers glass containers and systems
for research and development, and analytics fields, as well as for general
laboratory. Its products include volumetric flasks, beakers, conical flasks,
and vials; and distillation and filtration systems, as well as components for
precision lasers.
The company sells its products primarily in
Gerresheimer AG was founded in 1864 and is based in
Management:
Uwe ROEHRHOFF is the President and CEO
Mr. Uwe Roehrhoff serves as Chief Executive Officer of Gerresheimer Ag at
Kimble Chase Life Science and Research Products LLC. Mr. Roehrhoff serves as
the President of Gerresheimer Glass, Inc. (a/k/a Kimble Glass Inc.) and has
been its Chief Executive Officer since 2001.
He works for Gerresheimer for 20 years and was responsible for the
Moulded Glass Division and the Life Science Research Division. In addition, he
has played a decisive role in the expansion of Gerresheimer's US and Chinese
business. He joined Gerresheimer in 1991 and initially worked in controlling.
He has many years experience of international business management.
Vice Presidents include
- Richard HASENAUER
- Georg ANNEN
Randy BAUGHMANN is the CFO
Subsidiaries and
partnership:
GERRESHEIMER PEACHTREE CITY (
650 Highway 74 South
Peachtree City, GA 30269
KIMBLE CHASE LIFE SCIENCE AND RESEARCH PRODUCTS LLC
In
On a direct call, a financial
assistant controlled the present report but deferred any financials.
We sent an email but no
answer received.
Outside sources (bank) gave
sales for fiscal year ending April 2014 is in the range of USD 200,000,000=
The business is profitable.
Banks:
TD Bank
Phone: +1 856-327-5276
Legal filings & complaints:
As of today date, there is no legal filing pending with the Courts.
Secured debts summary (UCC):
None
COMPANY CREDIT HISTORY
TRADE REFERENCES:
Date reported: July 2014
High credit: USD 50,000+
Now owing: 0
Past due: 0
Last purchase: June 2014
Line of business: Office supply
Paying status: 6 days beyond terms
Date reported: July 2014
High credit: USD 2,000,000+
Now owing: 0
Past due: 0
Last purchase: June 2014
Line of business: Payroll
Paying status: As agreed
Date reported: July 2014
High credit: USD 1,800
Now owing: 0
Past due: 0
Last purchase: June 2014
Line of business: Telecommunications
Paying status: 5 days beyond terms
DOMESTIC CREDIT HISTORY:
Domestic credit history
appears as follow:
|
Monthly Payment
Trends - Recent Activity |
|
|
|
Date |
Up to 30 DBT |
31-60 DBT |
61-90 DBT |
>90 DBT |
||
|
03/14 |
$80,600 |
74% |
18% |
1% |
1% |
6% |
|
04/14 |
$121,300 |
74% |
21% |
2% |
0% |
3% |
|
05/14 |
$116,300 |
85% |
12% |
3% |
0% |
0% |
|
06/14 |
$115,700 |
78% |
19% |
3% |
0% |
0% |
|
07/14 |
$100,800 |
88% |
12% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
08/14 |
$108,800 |
85% |
13% |
2% |
0% |
0% |
National Credit Bureaus
gave a medium credit rating.
According to our credit analysts, during the last 6 months, 80% of trade
experience indicates a regular payment.
Payments are usually made with an average of 5 to 10 days beyond terms.
INTERNATIONAL CREDIT
HISTORY:
Payments of imports are currently made with an average of 2 to 5 days
beyond terms.
OTHER COMMENTS:
The Company maintains its
business.
The bank confirmed a
regular account.
The Company is in good
standing.
This means that all local
and federal taxes were paid on due date.
The risk is medium/low.
OUR OPINION:
A business connection may
be conducted.
Standard & Poor’s
|
|
|
Publication
date: 05-Aug-2011 20:13:14 EST |
·
We have lowered our long-term
sovereign credit rating on the United States of America to 'AA+' from 'AAA' and
affirmed the 'A-1+' short-term rating.
·
We have also removed both the short- and long-term ratings
from CreditWatch negative.
·
The downgrade reflects our
opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration
recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to
stabilize the government's medium-term debt dynamics.
·
More broadly, the downgrade
reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of
American policymaking and political institutions have weakened at a time of
ongoing fiscal and economic challenges to a degree more than we envisioned when
we assigned a negative outlook to the rating on April 18, 2011.
·
Since then, we have changed our
view of the difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties
over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress
and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a
broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt
dynamics any time soon.
·
The outlook on the long-term
rating is negative. We could lower the long-term rating to 'AA' within the next
two years if we see that less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher
interest rates, or new fiscal pressures during the period result in a higher
general government debt trajectory than we currently assume in our base case.
The transfer and
convertibility (T&C) assessment of the
debt service--remains
'AAA'.
We lowered our long-term
rating on the U.S. because we believe that the prolonged controversy over
raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate
indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public
spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an agreement on raising
revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a
contentious and fitful process. We also believe that the fiscal consolidation
plan that Congress and the Administration agreed to this week falls short of
the amount that we believe is necessary to stabilize the general government
debt burden by the middle of the decade.
Our lowering of the
rating was prompted by our view on the rising public debt burden and our
perception of greater policymaking uncertainty, consistent with our criteria
(see "Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and
Assumptions ," June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41).
Nevertheless, we view the
We have taken the ratings
off CreditWatch because the Aug. 2 passage of the Budget Control Act Amendment
of 2011 has removed any perceived immediate threat of payment default posed by
delays to raising the government's debt ceiling. In addition, we believe that
the act provides sufficient clarity to allow us to evaluate the likely course
of
The political
brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as
the containment of which we
and most other independent observers regard as key to long-term fiscal
sustainability.
Our opinion is that
elected officials remain wary of tackling the structural issues required to
effectively address the rising U.S. public debt burden in a manner consistent
with a 'AAA' rating and with 'AAA' rated sovereign peers (see Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and
Assumptions," June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41). In
our view, the difficulty in framing a consensus on fiscal policy weakens the
government's ability to manage public finances and diverts attention from the
debate over how to achieve more balanced and dynamic economic growth in an era
of fiscal stringency and private-sector deleveraging (ibid). A new political
consensus might (or might not) emerge after the 2012 elections, but we believe
that by then, the government debt burden will likely be higher, the needed
medium-term fiscal adjustment potentially greater, and the inflection point on
the U.S. population's demographics and other age-related spending drivers
closer at hand (see "Global Aging 2011: In The U.S., Going Gray Will Likely
Cost Even More Green, Now," June 21, 2011).
Standard & Poor's
takes no position on the mix of spending and revenue measures that Congress and
the Administration might conclude is appropriate for putting the
The act calls for as much
as $2.4 trillion of reductions in expenditure growth over the 10 years through
2021. These cuts will be implemented in two steps: the $917 billion agreed to
initially, followed by an additional $1.5 trillion that the newly formed
Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction is supposed to
recommend by November 2011. The act contains no measures to raise taxes or
otherwise enhance revenues, though the committee could recommend them.
The act further provides
that if Congress does not enact the committee's recommendations, cuts of $1.2
trillion will be implemented over the same time period. The reductions would
mainly affect outlays for civilian discretionary spending, defense, and
Medicare. We understand that this fall-back mechanism is designed to encourage
Congress to embrace a more balanced mix of expenditure savings, as the
committee might recommend.
We note that in a letter
to Congress on Aug. 1, 2011, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated
total budgetary savings under the act to be at least $2.1 trillion over the
next 10 years relative to its baseline assumptions. In updating our own fiscal
projections, with certain modifications outlined below, we have relied on the
CBO's latest "Alternate Fiscal Scenario" of June 2011, updated to
include the CBO assumptions contained in its Aug. 1 letter to Congress. In
general, the CBO's "Alternate Fiscal Scenario" assumes a continuation
of recent Congressional action overriding existing law.
We view the act's
measures as a step toward fiscal consolidation. However, this is within the
framework of a legislative mechanism that leaves open the details of what is
finally agreed to until the end of 2011, and Congress and the Administration
could modify any agreement in the future. Even assuming that at least $2.1
trillion of the spending reductions the act envisages are implemented, we
maintain our view that the
Compared with previous
projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003
tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed
our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue
to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress
reinforced by passing the act. Key macroeconomic assumptions in the base case
scenario include trend real GDP growth of 3% and consumer price inflation near
2% annually over the decade.
Our revised upside
scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as consistent with the
outlook on the 'AA+' long-term rating being revised to stable--retains these
same macroeconomic assumptions. In addition, it incorporates $950 billion of
new revenues on the assumption that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high earners
lapse from 2013 onwards, as the Administration is advocating. In this scenario,
we project that the net general government debt would rise from an estimated
74% of GDP by the end of 2011 to 77% in 2015 and to 78% by 2021.
Our revised downside
scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as being consistent with a
possible further downgrade to a 'AA' long-term rating--features less-favorable
macroeconomic assumptions, as outlined below and also assumes that the second
round of spending cuts (at least $1.2 trillion) that the act calls for does not
occur. This scenario also assumes somewhat higher nominal interest rates for
U.S. Treasuries. We still believe that the role of the U.S. dollar as the key
reserve currency confers a government funding advantage, one that could change
only slowly over time, and that Fed policy might lean toward continued loose
monetary policy at a time of fiscal tightening. Nonetheless, it is possible
that interest rates could rise if investors re-price relative risks. As a
result, our alternate scenario factors in a 50 basis point (bp)-75 bp rise in
10-year bond yields relative to the base and upside cases from 2013 onwards. In
this scenario, we project the net public debt burden would rise from 74% of GDP
in 2011 to 90% in 2015 and to 101% by 2021.
Our revised scenarios
also take into account the significant negative revisions to historical GDP
data that the Bureau of Economic Analysis announced on July 29. From our
perspective, the effect of these revisions underscores two related points when
evaluating the likely debt trajectory of the U.S. government. First, the
revisions show that the recent recession was deeper than previously assumed, so
the GDP this year is lower than previously thought in both nominal and real
terms. Consequently, the debt burden is slightly higher. Second, the revised
data highlight the sub-par path of the current economic recovery when compared
with rebounds following previous post-war recessions. We believe the sluggish
pace of the current economic recovery could be consistent with the experiences
of countries that have had financial crises in which the slow process of debt
deleveraging in the private sector leads to a persistent drag on demand. As a
result, our downside case scenario assumes relatively modest real trend GDP
growth of 2.5% and inflation of near 1.5% annually going forward.
When comparing the U.S.
to sovereigns with 'AAA' long-term ratings that we view as relevant
peers--Canada, France, Germany, and the U.K.--we also observe, based on our
base case scenarios for each, that the trajectory of the U.S.'s net public debt
is diverging from the others. Including the U.S., we estimate that these five
sovereigns will have net general government debt to GDP ratios this year
ranging from 34% (Canada) to 80% (the U.K.), with the U.S. debt burden at 74%.
By 2015, we project that their net public debt to GDP ratios will range between
30% (lowest, Canada) and 83% (highest, France), with the U.S. debt burden at
79%. However, in contrast with the U.S., we project that the net public debt
burdens of these other sovereigns will begin to decline, either before or by
2015.
Standard & Poor's
transfer T&C assessment of the U.S. remains 'AAA'. Our T&C assessment
reflects our view of the likelihood of the sovereign restricting other public
and private issuers' access to foreign exchange needed to meet debt service.
Although in our view the credit standing of the U.S. government has deteriorated
modestly, we see little indication that official interference of this kind is
entering onto the policy agenda of either Congress or the Administration.
Consequently, we continue to view this risk as being highly remote.
The outlook on the long-term
rating is negative. As our downside alternate fiscal scenario illustrates, a
higher public debt trajectory than we currently assume could lead us to lower
the long-term rating again. On the other hand, as our upside scenario
highlights, if the recommendations of the Congressional Joint Select Committee
on Deficit Reduction--independently or coupled with other initiatives, such as
the lapsing of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high earners--lead to fiscal
consolidation measures beyond the minimum mandated, and we believe they are
likely to slow the deterioration of the government's debt dynamics, the
long-term rating could stabilize at 'AA+'.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.60.45 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.99.45 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.79.46 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Analysis Done by
: |
KAR |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
TPT |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall
operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively below
average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk and
to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite
of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.