|
Report Date : |
13.09.2014 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
BHUSHAN STEEL LIMITED (w.e.f. 2007) |
|
|
|
|
Formerly Known
As : |
BHUSHAN STEEL AND STRIPS LIMITED |
|
|
|
|
Registered
Office : |
Bhushan Centre, Ground Floor, Hyatt Regency Complex, |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (as
on) : |
31.03.2014 |
|
|
|
|
Date of
Incorporation : |
07.01.1983 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
55-014942 |
|
|
|
|
Capital
Investment / Paid-up Capital : |
Rs.1490.300 Millions |
|
|
|
|
CIN No.: [Company Identification
No.] |
L74899DL1983PLC014942 |
|
|
|
|
TAN No.: [Tax Deduction &
Collection Account No.] |
DELB07323B |
|
|
|
|
PAN No.: [Permanent Account No.] |
AAACB1247M |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
A Public Limited Liability Company. The Company’s Shares are listed on
the Stock Exchanges. |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business
: |
Manufacturer and Distributor of Cold Rolled Steel Strips/Sheets/Coils
and Galvanized Cold Rolled Steel Strips/Sheets/Coils. |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees
: |
10000 (Approximately) |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B (33) |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Slow but correct |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Exist |
|
|
|
|
Comments : |
Subject is one of the well-established leading player in the steel
industry having moderate track. The management has seen a deterioration in the company’s credit
profile characterized by decline in its net profitability and further
aggravated by slower than expected ramping up of operations of Orissa phase
II expansion project. Moreover, the management has reported a loss from its operations
during the October – December quarter as a result of the working capital
intensive operations along with the large debt funded project expansion due
to which the management has seen an increase in its external borrowings
during the year under review, which has further weakened the liquidity
position. The ratings also take into consideration, the company’s vice chairman
and managing director Mr. Neeraj Singhal, has been named in a bribery case
registered by central bureau of Investigation (CBI) in relation with
extension of credit facilities by syndicate bank of the company. Business is active. Payment terms are reported as slow but
correct. In view of experience of the promoters and the company’s established
track in the industry the subject can be considered for business dealings
with slight caution. |
NOTES:
Any query related to this report can be made on
e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – June 1, 2014
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.03.2014) |
Current Rating (01.06.2014) |
|
India |
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
INDIAN ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
N E W S
As per the latest IMF study, the total weigh of emerging markets in the
GDP of the world on a purchasing power parity basis has seen a sizeable shift.
It highlights how as against 51 % in 2005, the emerging economies now account
for close to 56 % of the global purchasing power GDP as per the latest survey.
And with the emerging economies growing at a faster rate than their developed
counterparts, there are every possibility that the their share goes up further
in the coming years. China may surpass the US over the next few years.
Politics and economics are very intricately connected. They tend to
influence each other in ways that could be very complex and far-reaching. The
prospects of the India’s economy have been seriously compromised due to
political corruption. High inflation, poor standard of living are to a great
extent a result of rampant corruption in the country. China on the other hand,
seems to be facing diametrically opposite challenge. American hedge fund
manager Jim Chanos has been keenly following the political and economic
development in the dragon economy and has figured out something that is quite
worrying. He is of the view that the Chinese economy could be heading toward
trouble on account of new Chinese President Xi Jingping’s very aggressive
anti-corruption drive. Chanos believes tat many things such as apartment sales,
luxury products, etc. were largely bought with dirty money. And it is now
beginning to impact consumption. This may indeed be bad news for an economy
that is struggling to transition from an investment-driven export-oriented
economy to a domestic consumption-driven economy.
A study published by Firstpost has revealed that asset classes like real
estate and equities were the biggest beneficiaries of the liberalization policies.
A firm called Ciane Analytics studied returns from assets including
equities, gold, fixed deposits, G-Secs and real estate since 1991. Real estate
outperformed every other asset classes during the 23-year period with an
annualized return of 20 % ! Equities came in second with annualized return of
15.5 % ! However, while these returns may seem mouthwatering, the fact is that
the return from equities adjusted for inflation came down to just 7.1 %.
Some brief news are as under
. R-Power to buy Jaypee’s hydro assets
. Investors await justice in NSEL case
. India seeks MFN status from Pakistan ahead of meeting
. Ukrain’s clashes with rebels hinder MH17 crash investigation
. India exploring merger of state-owned hydro PSUs
..Higher costs weigh down profit growth to slowest in 9 quarters
..Wal-Mart to expand wholesale business in India
. GMR group moves to strengthen balance sheet
. Central Bank to sell 4 % stake to Life Insurance Corporation
. Tata Chemicals plans to raise up to Rs 10000 mn.
EXTERNAL AGENCY RATING
|
Rating Agency Name |
CARE |
|
Rating |
Long term bank facilities: BB |
|
Rating Explanation |
Moderate risk of default regarding timely
servicing of financial obligations. |
|
Date |
August 06, 2014 |
|
Rating Agency Name |
CARE |
|
Rating |
Short term bank facilities: A4 |
|
Rating Explanation |
Minimal degree of safety and very high
credit risk. |
|
Date |
August 06, 2014 |
RBI DEFAULTERS’ LIST STATUS
Subject’s name is not enlisted as a defaulter in
the publicly available RBI Defaulters’ list.
EPF (Employee Provident Fund) DEFAULTERS’ LIST STATUS
Subject’s name is not enlisted as a defaulter
in the publicly available EPF (Employee Provident Fund) Defaulters’ list as of
31-03-2014.
INFORMATION DENIED
Management Non Co-operative (91-11-26462373)
LOCATIONS
|
Registered/
Corporate Office 1 : |
Bhushan Centre, Ground Floor, Hyatt Regency Complex, Bhikaji Cama
Place, New Delhi - 110066,
India |
|
Tel. No.: |
91-11-26462373 (5 Lines) / 42297777 / 42295555 / 39194000 |
|
Fax No.: |
91-11-26478750 /
26415845 |
|
E-Mail : |
|
|
Website : |
|
|
|
|
|
Factory 1 and Marketing Office – Sahibabad : |
23, Site IV,
Sahibabad Industrial Area, Sahibabad, District |
|
Tel. No.: |
91-120-2770601-
04/ 3028000-09 |
|
Fax No.: |
91-120-2770509/
4100574 |
|
E-Mail : |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Office 2 : |
F Block, 1st
Floor, International Trade Tower, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019, India |
|
|
|
|
Factory 2 : |
28/4, Site IV,
Sahibabad Industrial Area, Sahibabad, District |
|
|
|
|
Factory 3 : |
Village Nifran,
Savroli and Dehvali, Taluka – Khalapura, (Near Khopoli), District Raigad –
410 203, |
|
Tel. No.: |
91-2192-274146/
302000 |
|
Fax No.: |
91-2192-274294/
274354 |
|
E-Mail : |
|
|
|
|
|
Factory 4 : |
Narendra Pur, P O
Shibapur, Village Meramandali, District – Dhenkanal – 759 121, |
|
Tel. No. : |
91-6764-300000/
326443/ 325133/ 325857 |
|
E-mail : |
|
|
|
|
|
Branches : |
Located at: ·
Agra ·
Ahmedabad ·
Aurangabad ·
Bengaluru ·
Bhubaneshwar ·
Chandigarh ·
Chennai ·
Coimbatore ·
Dehradun ·
Delhi ·
Faridabad ·
Gurgaon ·
Guwahati ·
Haldwani ·
Hyderabad ·
Hosur ·
Indore ·
Jaipur ·
Jammu ·
Kullu ·
Kolkata ·
Kanpur ·
Ludhiana ·
Mandigovindgarh ·
Mumbai ·
Pilkhuwa (Hapur) ·
Pune ·
Parwanoo ·
Rishikesh ·
Varanasi |
DIRECTORS
As on 31.03.2013
|
Name : |
Mr. Brij Bhushan
Singal |
|
Designation : |
Chairman |
|
Address: |
W-29, Greater Kailash, Part-II, New Delhi-110046, |
|
Date of Birth/
Age: |
20.11.1936 |
|
Date of
Appointment: |
15.01.1987 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Neeraj Singal |
|
Designation : |
Vice Chairman and Managing Director |
|
Address: |
W-29, Greater Kailash, Part-II, New Delhi-110046, |
|
Date of Birth/
Age: |
23.04.1968 |
|
Qualification: |
Graduate |
|
Date of
Appointment: |
01.04.1992 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Nittin Johari |
|
Designation : |
Whole-time
Director [Finance] |
|
Qualification: |
M.Com, FCA |
|
Date of
Appointment: |
06.01.1995 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Rahul Sen Gupta |
|
Designation : |
Whole-time
Director [Technical] |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. P.K. Aggarwal |
|
Designation : |
Whole time Director [Commercial] |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. Mohan Lal |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
Address: |
19-A, Udham Singh Nagar, |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. B B Tondon |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. V.K. Mehrotra |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mr. M. V. Surya
Narayana |
|
Designation : |
Director |
|
Address: |
12-2-417/A/11, Gudimalkapur,
Jaya Nagar, Hydedrabad - 500028, Andhra Pradesh, India |
|
Date of Birth/
Age: |
05.04.1946 |
|
Date of
Appointment: |
25.09.2010 |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Mrs. Sunita
Sharma |
|
Designation : |
Nominee Director
of LIC |
KEY EXECUTIVES
|
Name : |
Mr. O. P. Davra |
|
Designation : |
Company Secretary |
|
|
|
|
Name : |
Ms. Neha |
|
Designation : |
Reception |
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS / SHAREHOLDING PATTERN
As on 30.06.2014
|
Category of Shareholders |
No. of Shares |
Percentage of
Holding |
|
(A) Shareholding of Promoter and Promoter Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129061685 |
56.98 |
|
|
32431540 |
14.32 |
|
|
161493225 |
71.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholding of Promoter and Promoter Group (A) |
161493225 |
71.29 |
|
(B) Public Shareholding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42399 |
0.02 |
|
|
29430 |
0.01 |
|
|
8647389 |
3.82 |
|
|
4211252 |
1.86 |
|
|
12930470 |
5.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43067031 |
19.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3045260 |
1.34 |
|
|
5714783 |
2.52 |
|
|
263977 |
0.12 |
|
|
123568 |
0.05 |
|
|
140409 |
0.06 |
|
|
52091051 |
23.00 |
|
Total Public shareholding (B) |
65021521 |
28.71 |
|
Total (A)+(B) |
226514746 |
100.00 |
|
(C) Shares held by Custodians and against which Depository Receipts have
been issued |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.00 |
|
|
0 |
0.00 |
|
|
0 |
0.00 |
|
Total (A)+(B)+(C) |
226514746 |
0.00 |

BUSINESS DETAILS
|
Line of Business : |
Manufacturer and Distributor of Cold Rolled Steel Strips/Sheets/Coils
and Galvanized Cold Rolled Steel Strips/Sheets/Coils. |
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Products : |
· Cold Rolled Galvanised Bhushan
Galume Colour
Coated Coil Colour
Coated Tiles Drawn
Tubes of OEM Grade Hardened
and Tempered Strip High
Tensile Steel Stripping Wire
Rods and Alloy Billets Sponge
Iron |
GENERAL INFORMATION
|
Customers |
Wholesalers Alstom
BHEL Bajaj Bundy Ashok
Leyand Ford Honda Hitachi Hyundai IFB Mahindra GM SKF Kone Carrier Yamaha
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No. of Employees : |
10,000 (Approximately) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bankers : |
· State Bank of India ·
Punjab National Bank |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Facilities : |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Banking
Relations : |
|
|
|
|
|
Auditors : |
|
|
Name : |
Mehra Goel and Company Chartered
Accountants |
|
|
|
|
Joint Venture: |
·
Andal East Coal Company Private Limited |
|
|
|
|
Associates : |
·
Angul Sukinda Railway Limited Bhusahan Energy
Limited |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary companies: |
·
Bhushan
Steel (Orissa) Limited. ·
Bhushan
Steel Madhya Bharat Limited ·
Bhushan
Steel (South) Limited ·
Bhushan
Steel Bengal Limited ·
Parakeet
Finvest Private Limited
(from 25th January, 2012) ·
Marsh
Capital Services Private Limited
(from 25th January, 2012) ·
Paragon
Securities Private Limited
(from 25th January, 2012) ·
Perpetual
Securities Private Limited
(from 25th January, 2012) ·
Jawahar
Credit and Holdings Private Limited
(from 29th February, 2012) ·
Bhushan
Capital and Credit Services Private Limited.
(from 29th February, 2012) ·
Bhushan
Steel Global FZE (Upto 7th May, 2011) ·
Bhushan
Steel (Australia) PTY Limited -
Bowen
Energy Limited, Australia -
Kondor
Holdings PTY Limited -
Bowen
Coal PTY Limited -
Bowen
Consolidated PTY Limited ·
Capricorn
Metals Ltd. (Deregistered w.e.f. 4th April, 2011) ·
Capricorn
Resources (Australia) Limited
(Deregistered w.e.f. 4th April, 2011) · Golden Country Resources (Australia) PTY Limited |
|
|
|
|
Enterprises over which
Key Management Personnel and their relatives are able to exercise significant
influence: |
·
Arshiya
International Limited ·
Bhushan
Aviation Limited ·
Bhushan
Infrastructure Private Limited |
|
|
|
|
Sister Concern |
·
Bhushan
Steel (Orissa) ·
Bhushan
Steel (South) |
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
As ON 31.03.2014
Authorised Capital : Not Available
Issued, Subscribed & Paid-up Capital : Rs.1490.300 Millions
As on 31.03.2013
Authorised Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
400000000 |
Equity Shares |
Rs.2/- each |
Rs.800.000 Millions |
|
14500000 |
Preference Shares |
Rs.100/- each |
Rs.1450.000Millions |
|
|
Total |
|
Rs.
2250.000 Millions |
Issued Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
230605220 |
Equity Shares |
Rs. 2/- each |
Rs.461.210 Millions |
|
9405367 |
10% Redeemable Cumulative Preference Shares |
Rs. 100/- each |
Rs. 940.537 Millions |
|
354000 |
4% Non-convertible Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares |
Rs. 100/- each |
Rs. 35.400 Millions |
|
400000 |
25% Non-convertible Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares |
Rs. 100/- each |
Rs.40.000 Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs.1477.147 Millions |
Subscribed and
Paid-up Capital :
|
No. of Shares |
Type |
Value |
Amount |
|
212358310 |
Equity Shares |
Rs. 2/- each |
Rs.424.717 Millions |
|
14157220 |
Equity Shares |
Rs. 1/- each |
Rs.14.157 Millions |
|
9405367 |
10% Redeemable Cumulative Preference Shares |
Rs. 100/- each |
Rs. 940.537 Millions |
|
354000 |
4% Non convertible Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares |
Rs. 100/- each |
Rs. 35.400 Millions |
|
400000 |
25% Non convertible Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares |
Rs. 100/- each |
Rs.40.000 Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. 1454.811 Millions |
NOTE:
Detail of
Shareholders holding more than 5% shares:
|
Name of
Shareholders |
As at 31st March,2013 |
|
|
|
No. of Shares |
% Held |
|
(A) Equity Shareholders |
|
|
|
1. Brij Bhushan Singal |
45628672 |
20.14% |
|
2. Neeraj Singal |
73105933 |
32.27% |
|
3. Bhushan Infrastructure Private Limited |
29486540 |
13.01% |
|
(B) Preference Shareholders |
|
|
|
1. Bhushan Energy Limited |
1200000 |
11.81% |
|
2. Bhushan Finance Limited |
840000 |
8.27% |
|
3. Robust Transportation Limited |
531567 |
5.23% |
|
4. Shri Neeraj Singal |
1204400 |
11.86% |
|
5. Brij Bhushan Singal |
707100 |
6.96% |
|
Particulars |
As at 31st March,2013 |
|
|
No. of Shares |
Amount (Rs. In
Millions |
|
|
Reconciliation of
number of shares outstanding is set out |
|
|
|
below: |
|
|
|
(A) Equity Shares |
|
|
|
At the beginning of the year |
212358310 |
424.717 |
|
Add : Shares Issued |
14157220 |
14.157 |
|
Less: Shares Cancelled |
-- |
-- |
|
At the end of the year |
226515530 |
438.874 |
|
(B) Preference
Shares (Non Convertible Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares) |
|
|
|
10% Preference
Shares |
|
|
|
At the beginning of the year |
7795267 |
779.527 |
|
Add : Shares Issued |
1610100 |
161.010 |
|
Less: Shares Redeemed |
-- |
-- |
|
At the end of the year |
9405367 |
940.537 |
|
4% Preference
Shares |
|
|
|
At the beginning of the year |
399000 |
39.900 |
|
Add : Shares Issued |
-- |
-- |
|
Less: Shares Redeemed |
45000 |
4.500 |
|
At the end of the year |
354000 |
35.400 |
|
25% Preference
Shares |
|
|
|
At the beginning of the year |
400000 |
40.000 |
|
Add : Shares Issued |
-- |
-- |
|
Less: Shares Redeemed |
-- |
-- |
|
At the end of the year |
400000 |
40.000 |
The holders of Equity Shares has one vote for each equity shares held by them. The registerd holders of Equity Shares are entitled to dividend declared from time to time. The Preference Shareholders are entitled to pro-rata dividend in preference over Equity Shareholders. The dividend is cumulative at the rate specified against each category.
The premium on redemption of preference shares to the extent of premium received on issue will be adjusted against the security premium account and any premium paid over the above said amount shall be paid out of current appropriation / General Reserve.
The Preference Share are not convertible in Equity and are redeemable at the option of the company.
FINANCIAL DATA
[all figures are
in Rupees Millions]
ABRIDGED BALANCE
SHEET
|
SOURCES
OF FUNDS |
31.03.2014 |
31.03.2013 |
31.03.2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
(1)Shareholders' Funds |
|
|
|
|
(a) Share Capital |
1490.300 |
1454.811 |
1284.144 |
|
(b) Reserves & Surplus |
90041.000 |
89026.194 |
72679.500 |
|
(c) Money received against
share warrants |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Share Application money
pending allotment |
0.000 |
0.000 |
3830.100 |
|
Total
Shareholders’ Funds (1) + (2) |
91531.300 |
90481.005 |
77793.744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Non-Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
(a) long-term borrowings |
255661.000 |
216642.128 |
155287.802 |
|
(b) Deferred tax liabilities
(Net) |
13751.900 |
13427.818 |
10388.183 |
|
(c) Other long term
liabilities |
21616.300 |
21794.561 |
15058.998 |
|
(d) long-term provisions |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
Total
Non-current Liabilities (3) |
291029.200 |
251864.507 |
180734.983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
(a) Short term borrowings |
62730.700 |
52328.639 |
42877.823 |
|
(b) Trade payables |
23508.700 |
16170.235 |
9931.250 |
|
(c) Other current liabilities |
41379.900 |
21011.854 |
22622.509 |
|
(d) Short-term provisions |
427.600 |
759.843 |
548.366 |
|
Total
Current Liabilities (4) |
128046.900 |
90270.571 |
75979.948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
510607.400 |
432616.083 |
334508.675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
II.
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
(1) Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
(a) Fixed Assets |
|
|
|
|
(i) Tangible assets |
381905.200 |
181415.523 |
157327.164 |
|
(ii) Intangible Assets |
0.000 |
11.584 |
11.801 |
|
(iii) Capital work-in-progress |
0.000 |
125953.132 |
90686.743 |
|
(iv) Intangible assets under
development |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
(b) Non-current Investments |
6232.400 |
4024.554 |
3047.026 |
|
(c) Deferred tax assets (net) |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
(d) Long-term Loan and Advances |
17939.400 |
24959.380 |
28260.352 |
|
(e) Other Non-current assets |
0.000 |
214.014 |
193.754 |
|
Total
Non-Current Assets |
406077.000 |
336578.187 |
279526.840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Current assets |
|
|
|
|
(a) Current investments |
0.000 |
247.500 |
247.500 |
|
(b) Inventories |
64802.500 |
55596.755 |
33114.261 |
|
(c) Trade receivables |
24644.500 |
23430.872 |
12203.763 |
|
(d) Cash and cash equivalents |
829.600 |
1536.256 |
3349.803 |
|
(e) Short-term loans and
advances |
14244.200 |
15226.513 |
6066.508 |
|
(f) Other current assets |
9.600 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
Total
Current Assets |
104530.400 |
96037.896 |
54981.835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
510607.400 |
432616.083 |
334508.675 |
PROFIT & LOSS
ACCOUNT
|
|
PARTICULARS |
31.03.2014 |
31.03.2013 |
31.03.2012 |
|
|
SALES |
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
96758.300 |
107442.697 |
99414.077 |
|
|
Other Income |
291.100 |
173.359 |
273.442 |
|
|
TOTAL
(A) |
97049.400 |
107616.056 |
99687.519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Materials Consumed |
51893.900 |
57986.415 |
55067.473 |
|
|
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade |
390.500 |
811.855 |
0.000 |
|
|
Changes in inventories of
finished goods, work-in-progress and Stock-in-Trade |
(213.800) |
(1058.367) |
(653.307) |
|
|
Employees benefits expense |
1885.300 |
1734.541 |
1439.797 |
|
|
Other expenses |
15867.600 |
14818.588 |
13519.329 |
|
|
TOTAL
(B) |
69823.500 |
74293.032 |
69373.292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
PROFIT/
(LOSS) BEFORE INTEREST, TAX, DEPRECIATION
AND AMORTISATION (C) |
27225.900 |
33323.024 |
30314.227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
FINANCIAL
EXPENSES (D) |
16633.000 |
12874.431 |
10462.673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFIT
/ (LOSS) BEFORE TAX, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTISATION (C-D) (E) |
10592.900 |
20448.593 |
19851.554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
DEPRECIATION/
AMORTISATION (F) |
9639.600 |
8308.619 |
6199.295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFIT/
(LOSS) BEFORE TAX (E-F) (G) |
953.300 |
12139.974 |
13652.259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
TAX
(I) |
333.700 |
3051.071 |
3417.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFIT/
(LOSS) AFTER TAX (G-I)
(J) |
619.600 |
9088.903 |
10234.749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add |
PREVIOUS
YEARS’ BALANCE BROUGHT FORWARD |
217.632 |
89.309 |
37.769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
APPROPRIATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Dividend on Equity
Shares |
|
113.258 |
106.179 |
|
|
Proposed Dividend on
Preference Shares |
|
1.148 |
0.407 |
|
|
Provision for Dividend Tax |
|
19.443 |
17.291 |
|
|
Interim Dividend on Preference
Shares |
NA |
89.547 |
75.050 |
|
|
Dividend Tax on Interim
Dividend |
|
14.527 |
12.193 |
|
|
Transferred to Debenture Redemption Reserve |
|
2696.250 |
847.500 |
|
|
Release from Debenture Redemption Reserve |
|
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
|
Transfer to General Reserve |
|
6000.000 |
9000.000 |
|
|
Premium paid on Redemption of
Preference Shares |
|
26.407 |
124.589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Carried to the B/S (J+K+L-M) |
NA |
217.632 |
89.309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS
IN FOREIGN CURRENCY |
|
|
|
|
|
FOB Value of Export |
|
18128.945 |
14553.645 |
|
|
Interest Received |
|
1.862 |
14.816 |
|
|
TOTAL
EARNINGS |
NA |
18130.807 |
14568.461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMPORTS |
|
|
|
|
|
Raw Materials |
|
16794.751 |
14937.369 |
|
|
Stores & Spares |
|
1219.888 |
599.81 |
|
|
Capital Goods |
|
12426.676 |
19137.965 |
|
|
TOTAL
IMPORTS |
NA |
30441.315 |
34675.144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
/ (Loss) Per Share (Rs.) |
2.23 |
41.61 |
47.78 |
KEY RATIOS
|
PARTICULARS |
|
31.03.2014 |
31.03.2013 |
31.03.2012 |
|
PAT / Total Income |
(%) |
0.64 |
8.45 |
10.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit Margin (PBT/Sales) |
(%) |
0.99 |
11.30 |
13.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Total Assets (PBT/Total Assets} |
(%) |
0.19 |
4.01 |
5.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Investment (ROI) (PBT/Networth) |
|
0.01 |
0.13 |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Equity Ratio (Total Debt /Networth) |
|
3.48 |
2.97 |
2.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Ratio (Current Asset/Current Liability) |
|
0.82 |
1.06 |
0.72 |
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
[all figures are
in Rupees Millions]
DEBT EQUITY RATIO
|
Particular |
31.03.2012 |
31.03.2013 |
31.03.2014 |
|
|
(Rs. In Millions) |
(Rs. In Millions) |
(Rs. In Millions) |
|
Share Capital |
1284.144 |
1454.811 |
1490.300 |
|
Reserves & Surplus |
72679.500 |
89026.194 |
90041.000 |
|
Share Application money pending allotment |
3830.100 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
Net worth |
77793.744 |
90481.005 |
91531.300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
long-term borrowings |
155287.802 |
216642.128 |
255661.000 |
|
Short term borrowings |
42877.823 |
52328.639 |
62730.700 |
|
Total borrowings |
198165.625 |
268970.767 |
318391.700 |
|
Debt/Equity ratio |
2.547 |
2.973 |
3.479 |

YEAR-ON-YEAR GROWTH
|
Year
on Year Growth |
31.03.2012 |
31.03.2013 |
31.03.2014 |
|
|
(Rs.
In Millions) |
(Rs.
In Millions) |
(Rs.
In Millions) |
|
Sales |
99414.077 |
107442.697 |
96758.300 |
|
|
|
8.076 |
(9.944) |

NET PROFIT MARGIN
|
Net
Profit Margin |
31.03.2012 |
31.03.2013 |
31.03.2014 |
|
|
(Rs.
In Millions) |
(Rs.
In Millions) |
(Rs.
In Millions) |
|
Sales |
99414.077 |
107442.697 |
96758.300 |
|
Profit |
10234.749 |
9088.903 |
619.600 |
|
|
10.30% |
8.46% |
0.64% |

LOCAL AGENCY FURTHER INFORMATION
|
Sr. No. |
Check List by Info Agents |
Available in
Report (Yes / No) |
|
1] |
Year of Establishment |
Yes |
|
2] |
Locality of the firm |
Yes |
|
3] |
Constitutions of the firm |
Yes |
|
4] |
Premises details |
No |
|
5] |
Type of Business |
Yes |
|
6] |
Line of Business |
Yes |
|
7] |
Promoter's background |
Yes |
|
8] |
No. of employees |
Yes |
|
9] |
Name of person contacted |
No |
|
10] |
Designation of contact
person |
No |
|
11] |
Turnover of firm for last
three years |
Yes |
|
12] |
Profitability for last
three years |
Yes |
|
13] |
Reasons for variation
<> 20% |
-- |
|
14] |
Estimation for coming financial
year |
No |
|
15] |
Capital in the business |
Yes |
|
16] |
Details of sister
concerns |
Yes |
|
17] |
Major suppliers |
No |
|
18] |
Major customers |
Yes |
|
19] |
Payments terms |
Yes |
|
20] |
Export / Import details
(if applicable) |
No |
|
21] |
Market information |
-- |
|
22] |
Litigations that the firm
/ promoter involved in |
Yes |
|
23] |
Banking Details |
Yes |
|
24] |
Banking facility details |
Yes |
|
25] |
Conduct of the banking
account |
-- |
|
26] |
Buyer visit details |
-- |
|
27] |
Financials, if provided |
Yes |
|
28] |
Incorporation details, if
applicable |
Yes |
|
29] |
Last accounts filed at
ROC |
Yes |
|
30] |
Major Shareholders, if
available |
Yes |
|
31] |
Date of Birth of
Proprietor/Partner/Director, if available |
Yes |
|
32] |
PAN of
Proprietor/Partner/Director, if available |
No |
|
33] |
Voter ID No of
Proprietor/Partner/Director, if available |
No |
|
34] |
External Agency Rating,
if available |
Yes |
LITIGATION
DETAILS
|
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Through: Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
I.A. 10468/2014
This is an application filed by the defendant seeking extension of time in filing the written statement. It is not understandable as to why the Joint Registrar has listed this matter on the last working day before the court.
Notice. Counsel for the plaintiff / non-applicant wishes to file a reply. Let the reply be filed within two weeks from the date of re-opening of the Court after Summer Vacation.
List on 4.8.2014, before Joint Registrar, the date already fixed. |
CHARGES
|
ENTITY |
PERSON |
COMPETENT AUTHORITY |
REGULATORY
CHARGES |
REGULATORY
ACTION(S) / DATE OF ORDER |
FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS |
|
BHUSHAN STEEL LIMITED
|
|
SEBI |
DID NOT MAKE PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT AS REQUIRED UNDER
REGULATION 10 OF SEBI TAKEOVER CODE, 1997 IN MATTER OF ACQUISITION OF SHARES
OF ORISSA SPONGE IRON And STEEL LIMITED |
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.0.450, Millions ALONG WITH OTHER
ENTITIES/PERSONS |
SAT: APPEAL ALLOWED AND IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 18/01/2010
SET ASIDE WITH NO ORDER AS TO COSTS |
NOTE: Registered office of the company has been shifted from F Block, 1st Floor, International Trade Tower, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019, India, to the present
UNSECURED LOAN
|
PARTICULARS |
31.03.2014 (Rs.
In Millions) |
31.03.2013 (Rs.
In Millions) |
|
LONG TERM BORROWINGS |
|
|
|
Term Loan |
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Loans |
|
|
|
From Indian Banks |
|
1791.900 |
|
From Foreign Banks |
|
4234.735 |
|
From Others |
|
84.711 |
|
Less: current maturity of Long Term Borrowing |
|
(16263.148) |
|
|
|
|
|
SHORT TERM BORROWINGS |
|
|
|
From Bank |
|
|
|
Rupee Loan |
|
|
|
Term Loan / Commercial Paper |
|
6803.175 |
|
Foreign Currency
Loans |
|
|
|
From Indian Banks |
|
1286.749 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
NA |
(2061.878) |
EXPANSION
PROJECT:
The company is under
implementation of 0.35 MTPA capacity Colled Rolling cum Electrical Steel
(CRNGO) Complex at estimated project cost of Rs.15630.000 Millions at
Meramandali, Orissa.
In addition to the above,
the company shall also be completing the Coke oven plant (1.3 MTPA), Coal
Washery (2.5 MTPA) and 2 DRI Kilns (aggregate capacity of 0.34 MTPA) and 197 MW
Power Plant at the existing site of Integrated steel plant at Orissa in the
current financial year i.e. 2013-14.
In order to maintain its
leadership position in downstream segment of steel industry and to maximize the
margins, the company is setting up the downstream capacity of 1.8 MTPA, where
the company shall come up with PLTCM of 1.8 MTPA and CAL of 1 MTPA with the
estimated capex of Rs.59950.000 Millions at Meramandali, Orissa to fully
utilize its additional HR capacity. With this the company's total downstream
production capacity shall be increased to about 4 MTPA by FY 2017.
FINANCE:
During the year the
Company has tied up the term loans in foreign currency and rupee for its
expansion plans and for the requirement of funds for its normal capital
expenditure. The Company has tied up Rupee Term Loan of f 10420.000 Millions
from Axis Bank as Syndication lead bank for their CRNGO project at Orissa.
The Working Capital
facilities for Sahibabad, Khopoli and Orissa Plants have been appraised by PNB,
the lead Bank, for Rs.113900.000 Millions (Fund Based limit of Rs.53900.000
Millions and Non Fund Based limit of Rs.60000.000 Millions) for the Financial
year 2013-14.
CREDIT
RATING:
The Long Term rating of
The Company is Care A+ by Credit Analysis and Research Limited as per the
provisions of BASEL II guidelines of RBI.
The Credit Analysis and
Research Limited (CARE) has rated the short term rating at the highest rating
of A1+ (A One Plus) for short term credit facilities of the Company.
MANAGEMENT
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
INDUSTRY
STRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENTS
The steel industry is
divided into primary and secondary sectors. The primary sector products are
billets, pallets, rounds and Hot Rolled Coils/Plates (HRC/HRP).These form raw
material for the secondary sector ,which produces value added items such as
Angles, Channels, wire Rods, Cold Rolled Coils/sheets (CRC/CRS) AND Galvanised
Coils/Sheets. CR Sheet is a thinner sheet used for consumer durables like
refrigerators, washing machines, automobiles, bicycles, etc. CR sheets are used
by the automobile and domestic appliances industry whereas CR strips are used
in manufacturing of bicycles, drums, barrels, fabrication, furniture etc. CR
Coils are mainly used for manufacturing GP/GC sheets. Bhushan Steel Limited
which so far falls under secondary sector, also entered in primary sector with
setting up plant at Orissa.
PERFORMANCE
The company is engaged in Steel business, which is context of Accounting Standard (AS)-17 issued by the institute of Chartered Accountants of India is considered the only business segment. The overall operational performance of the company has been much satisfactory during the year. The plants have operated optimally during the year and there were no major break downs or shutdowns.
|
S.No. |
Charge Id |
Date Of Charge
Creation/Modification |
Charge Amount
Secured |
Charge Holder |
Address |
Service Request
Number (Srn) |
|
1 |
10474663 |
03/01/2014 |
6,000,000,000.00 |
PUNJAB NATIONAL
BANK |
LARGE CORPORATE
BRANCH, TOLSTOY HOUSE, TOLSTOY MARG, NEW DELHI, DELHI - 110001, INDIA |
B95112041 |
|
2 |
10469506 |
26/12/2013 |
1,000,000,000.00 |
STATE BANK OF
HYDERABAD |
CORE-6, SCOPE
COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI, DELHI - 110003, INDIA |
B93258226 |
|
3 |
10469498 |
20/12/2013 |
500,000,000.00 |
THE JAMMU AND
KASHMIR BANK LIMITED |
G-40,, CONNAUGHT
PLACE, NEW DELHI, DELHI - 110001, INDIA |
B93256618 |
|
4 |
10464778 |
05/12/2013 |
500,000,000.00 |
THE FEDERAL BANK
LIMITED |
CORPORATE BANKING
BRANCH, E-13-29, HARSHA BHAWAN, CONNAUGHT PLACE,, NEW DELHI, DELHI - 110001,
INDIA |
B91376855 |
|
5 |
10462754 |
25/11/2013 |
2,000,000,000.00 |
ORIENTAL BANK OF
COMMERCE |
INDUSTRIAL
FINANCE BRANCH, A-30-33, 1ST FLOOR, CO |
B90570789 |
|
6 |
10467526 |
29/01/2014 * |
10,000,000,000.00 |
STATE BANK OF
INDIA |
CORP. ACCOUNTS
GROUP BRANCH, JAWAHAR VYAPAR BHAWAN |
B96143771 |
|
7 |
10467359 |
28/11/2013 * |
2,000,000,000.00 |
AXIS TRUSTEE
SERVICES LIMITED |
AXIS HOUSE, 2ND
FLR, BOMBAY DYEING MILLS COMPOUND, ANDURANG BUDHKAR MARG, WORLI,, MUMBAI,
MAHARAS |
B93080273 |
|
8 |
10454137 |
26/09/2013 |
200,000,000.00 |
JSC VTB BANK |
THE TAJ MAHAL
HOTEL, THE LOBBY MEZZANINE FLOOR, NO. 1 MANSING ROAD, NEW DELHI, DELHI -
110011, INDIA |
B87137758 |
|
9 |
10452147 |
26/09/2013 |
1,500,000,000.00 |
STATE BANK OF
MYSORE |
CORPORATE ACCOUNTS
BRANCH, NO. 3,4 AND 5 DDA BUILDINGS, NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI, DELHI - 110019,
INDIA |
B86269347 |
|
10 |
10449904 |
21/09/2013 |
3,000,000,000.00 |
ALLAHABAD BANK |
INDUSTRIAL
FINANCE BRANCH, 17, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI, DELHI - 110001, INDIA |
B85338705 |
* Date of charge modification
STATEMENT OF
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 30.06.2014
(Rs. In Millions)
|
Sr. No. |
Particular |
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
30.06.2014 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
1. |
Income from operations |
|
|
|
Domestic Sales |
25375.700 |
|
|
Export Sales |
4078.200 |
|
|
Total Gross Sales of Finished Goods |
29453.900 |
|
|
Less : Excise
Duty |
2741.100 |
|
(a) |
Net Sales/Income
from Operations |
26712.800 |
|
|
Other operating income
|
1390.600 |
|
|
Less : Excise
Duty |
86.600 |
|
|
Net Other
Operating Income |
1304.000 |
|
|
Net Sales / Total
Income from Operations |
28016.800 |
|
2. |
Expenditure |
|
|
|
Cost
of materials consumed |
14108.700 |
|
|
Purchase
of stock in trade |
- |
|
|
Changes
in inventories of finished goods, work in progress and stock in trade |
1222.300 |
|
|
Employee
benefits expenses |
548.600 |
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization expenses |
3065.200 |
|
|
Other
expenses |
4983.800 |
|
|
Total Expenses |
23928.600 |
|
3. |
Profit/ (Loss) from Operations
before Other Income, Interest and Exceptional Items (1-2) |
4088.200 |
|
4. |
Other
Income |
20.400 |
|
5. |
Profit/ (Loss) from ordinary
activities before finance costs and Exceptional
Items (3+4) |
4108.600 |
|
6. |
Finance
Cost (net) |
5524.900 |
|
7. |
Profit/ (Loss) from ordinary
activities after finance costs and but before Exceptional Items (5-6) |
(1416.300) |
|
8. |
Exceptional
Items |
- |
|
9. |
Profit/ (Loss) from ordinary
activities before tax (7+8) |
(1416.300) |
|
10. |
Tax
Expense |
- |
|
11. |
Profit/ (Loss) from ordinary
activities after tax (9-10) |
(1416.300) |
|
12. |
Extraordinary Items (net of
tax expenses) |
|
|
13 |
Net Profit/ (Loss) for the
period (11-12) |
(1416.300) |
|
14. |
Paid-up Equity Share Capital (Face Value per share Re.10) |
453.000 |
|
16i. |
Earnings Per Share
– (Before Extraordinary Items) |
|
|
|
Basic |
(6.37) |
|
|
Diluted |
(6.37) |
|
|
|
|
|
A |
PARTICULARS OF
SHAREHOLDING |
|
|
1. |
Public Shareholding |
|
|
|
-Number
of Shares |
65021521 |
|
|
-
Percentage of Shareholding |
28.71% |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Promoters and Promoter Group
Shareholding |
|
|
|
a) Pledged/Encumbered |
|
|
|
- Number
of Shares |
119851863 |
|
|
-
Percentage of Shares (as a % of the Total Shareholding of promoter and
promoter group) |
74.21% |
|
|
-
Percentage of Shares (as a % of the Total Share Capital of the Company) |
52.91% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Non Encumbered |
|
|
|
-
Number of Shares |
41641362 |
|
|
-
Percentage of Shares (as a % of the Total Shareholding of Promoter and
Promoter Group) |
25.79% |
|
|
-
Percentage of Shares (as a % of the Total Share Capital of the Company) |
18.38% |
|
Particulars |
|
|
Pending at the beginning of the quarter |
Nil |
|
Received during the quarter |
Nil |
|
Disposed of during the quarter |
Nil |
|
Remaining unresolved at the end of the
quarter |
Nil |
Notes:
1. The above results have been reviewed by Audit committee and approved by the Board of Directors at New Delhi on August 12, 2014.
2. During the current quarter the Company has made allotment and redemption of 2085000 and 736751 Redeemable Cumulative Preference Shares respectively.
3. The limited review for the quarter ended on June 30, 2014 as required under clause 41 of the listing agreement with the stock exchanges has been carried out by the Statutory Auditors.
4. The Company is engaged in the steel business, which in the context of Accounting Standard (AS) -17, is considered the only business segment.
5. Depreciation has been provided on the basis of the existing policy of the Company being followed up to March 31, 2014 as prescribed under Schedule XIV to the Companies Act, 1956. However as required under Schedule II and other applicable provisions of Companies Act, 2013, the Company is in the process of identification of various components of all plants and machinaries of the Company and determination of their useful life. Keeping in view the quantum of Company’s business activities, the proposed activity may take considerable time for implementation, therefore, the impact of same if any, will be reflected in financials of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2015.
6. Figures of the quarter ended March 31, 2014 are the balancing figures between audited figures in respect of full financial year and the published year to date figures upto the third quarter of the financial year ended March 31, 2014.
7. Previous period / year figures have been regrouped / rearranged to make them comparable with current period / year.
Fixed Assets
v
Tangible
Assets
Freehold
Land
Leasehold
Land / Building
Plant
and Machinery
Railway
Siding
Furniture
and Fixtures
Vehicles
Office
Equipment
v
Intangible Assets
Computer
Software
PRESS RELEASES
BHUSHAN STEEL
SLIPS 5% ON RATING DOWNGRADE; DOWN 60% SINCE AUGUST
NEW DELHI: Bhushan Steel Limited BSE -4.97 % slipped as much as 4.98 per cent in trade on Monday and was locked in lower circuit after rating agency CARE downgraded it six notches in two months and Brickwork Ratings scaled it down 16 notches in five months.
Delhi-based steelmaker Bhushan Steel, is having a hard time convincing its lenders that it can pay off its Rs 400000.000-Millions debt after its managing director and promoter Neeraj Singhal was arrested in a bribery case last week, which hit yet another 52-week low of Rs 152.50 in trade today.
At 09:40 a.m.; Bhushan SteelBSE -4.97 % was locked in lower circuit at Rs 152.50, down 4.98 per cent lower. The stock has plunged nearly 60 per cent since August and nearly 70 per cent so far in the year 2014.
The steel maker which enjoyed stellar ratings from both its credit rating agencies till almost the beginning of the year before it was subjected to a cataclysmic downgrade that caught the lenders unawares, ET reported.
Banks and investors rely on ratings provided by agencies such as CARE and Brickwork to assess the safety of their investments and loans.
CARE downgraded Bhushan Steel's 'A+' rating on its long-term bank debt to 'A' in January and then directly to 'BB' in March. CARE also rates its non-convertible debentures (NCD) and working capital loans, added the report.
An A+ rating meant Bhushan Steel loan was deemed to be at low risk of defaulting.
Another agency Brickwork, which rates the company's Rs 5000.000 Millions NCD issue, downgraded the company 16 notches to C in February from A+ in September, 2013.
Bhushan Steel's debt is four times its gross sales reported in 2013-14 and 11 times its current market value. CARE had said it derived confidence from Bhushan Steel's promoters even though it remained cautious on its debt-laden balance sheet that was funding expansion, added the ET report.
BHUSHAN STEEL
SLUMPS TO 52-WEEK LOW
August 7, 2014
Bhushan Steel was locked in 20% lower circuit
at Rs 243.70 at 14:41 IST on BSE, with the stock extending recent fall.
Meanwhile, the BSE Sensex was up 102.09
points, or 0.4%, to 25,767.36
On BSE, so far 45,963 shares were traded in
the counter with pending sell orders of 6.32 lakh shares at lower circuit. The
stock has an average daily volume of 60,145 shares in the past one quarter.
The stock opened with a downward gap,
declining by the maximum 20% daily circuit and remained locked at the 20% level
at Rs 243.70 so far during the day, which is also 52-week low for the counter.
The stock had hit a 52-week high of Rs 504 on 11 November 2013.
The stock had underperformed the market over
the past one month till 6 August 2014, falling 24.29% compared with 1.14% fall
in the Sensex. The scrip had also underperformed the market in past one
quarter, sliding 31.96% as against Sensex's 14.03% rise.
The mid-cap company has an equity capital of Rs
453.000 Millions. Face value per share is Rs 2.
Shares of Bhushan Steel had dropped 4.23% to
Rs 378.15 on Monday, 4 August 2014, after the Central Bureau of Investigation
(CBI) on Saturday, 2 August 2014, arrested the now-suspended
Chairman-cum-Managing Director of Syndicate Bank SK Jain after he had allegedly
demanded a bribe of Rs 5.000 Million from Bhushan Steel to not convert the
company's outstanding loan into a Non Performing Asset (NPA). As per reports,
Bhushan Steel had taken a loan of Rs 100 Millions from Syndicate Bank while
Prakash Industries had taken a loan of Rs 1200.000 Millions. Both companies were desperate to avoid their loans being
declared NPAs for default in repayments. Shares of Bhushan Steel rose 0.69% to
settle at Rs 380.75 on Tuesday, 5 August 2014. The stock fell by maximum
permissible daily limit of 20% to Rs 304.60 on Wednesday, 6 August 2014.
CBI Director Ranjit Sinha had reportedly
ordered an internal inquiry after his team did not arrest Bhushan Steel
vice-chairman Neeraj Singhal during searches at his residence in the Syndicate
Bank bribery case, despite clear instructions to pick him up. Neeraj Singhal is
on the run from the time of the raid and the CBI has been trying to trace him
since, so that he can be arrested, reports added.
Meanwhile, a Delhi court on Wednesday, 6
August 2014 reportedly dismissed the anticipatory bail plea of Neeraj Singhal
in connection with the Syndicate Bank bribery case.
In view of the ongoing development and the
possible impact of the same on the credit risk profile of Bhushan Steel, rating
firm CARE on Wednesday, 6 August 2014 placed the ratings on Credit Watch. CARE
is in discussion with Bhushan Steel on the ongoing developments and would take
necessary action when greater clarity emerges, a press release issued by CARE
indicated.
Bhushan Steel reported net loss of Rs 195.700
Millions in Q4 March 2014 as compared to net profit of Rs 2802.100 Millions in
Q4 March 2013. Net sales fell 10.9% to Rs 23997.300 Millions in Q4 March 2014
over Q4 March 2013.
Bhushan Steel is one of the leading prominent
player in steel industry. The company is now India's 3rd largest secondary
steel producer company with an existing steel production capacity of 2 million
tonne per annum (approx.).
BHUSHAN STEEL: TIME
RUNNING OUT?
Experts advise: Stay away from the stock, even after it has fallen 60%
in only 8 trading sessions; taint on the management, high debt and recent
problems in earnings add to the question marks, despite
August 18, 2014
Bhushan Steel, in the centre of a storm over
recent days, has seen its stock fall from Rs 381 on August 5 when its
vice-chairman and managing director, Neeraj Singal, was arrested in the
Syndicate Bank bribery case, to Rs 152.50 currently. For the past eight trading sessions, the
stock has been locked in the lower circuit. The market capitalisation has
fallen Rs 52000.000 Millions, taking the current value to only Rs
34540.000 Millions for a company that has 2.7 million
tonnes per annum (mtpa) of operational steel manufacturing capacity and is in
the process of commissioning another 2.5 mtpa by the end of the current
financial year.
It is unclear whether Bhushan is a steal at
these levels or whether the market was earlier overvaluing the company. The
expansion plans of peers provide some e answers.
Recently, referring to the government’s plan
of taking India’s steel-making capacity to 300 mtpa by 2025, a senior industry
official had said it took about $1 billion (Rs 6,000 Millions) to build one
mtpa capacity. Giriraj Daga, senior research analyst, Nirmal Bang Institutional
Equities, seconds the view. A one mtpa expansion costs Rs 30000.000-40000.000 Millions but a new project costs more, given
the need for setting up allied infrastructure. In January, government-owned
Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) said it would expand its capacity to 24
mtpa, by adding 10 mtpa at a cost of Rs 600000.000 Millions. And, that further expansion to 50 mtpa by 2025 would cost Rs
1700000.000 Millions or Rs 65000.000 Millions per mt.
Consider Tata Steel, which in two phases is
building a six mtpa plant at Kalinganagar in Odisha’s Jajpur district. The
first phase of three mtpa is expected to be commissioned by the end of FY15 and
to cost Rs 260000.000 Millions. Although the cost had increased
owing to delays due to land acquisition problems in earlier years, it also
includes cost of allied infrastructure such as rail links, raw material, etc,
say analysts. The second phase of three mtpa expansion is estimated to cost Rs
120000.000- 140000.000 Millions. These
estimates peg Bhushan Steel’s value at Rs 312000.000-338000.000 Millions, based on Rs 60000.000-65000.000 Millions as the cost per mt and an estimated
steel capacity of 5.2 mtpa. These numbers are almost equal to the Rs 323400.000 Millions the company is spending on the Phase-III expansion project. Of
this, it had already spent Rs 271000.000 Millions by the
end of the June quarter. The existing 2.7 mtpa capacity is also worth a good
amount. However, among the keys to profitability is backward integration (coal
and iron ore mines) initiatives, which in Bhushan’s case are still to see the
light of day.
Beyond these capacities, the company stands
out due to its value-added products portfolio, which caters primarily to the
needs of automobile and white-goods makers. It manufacturers these with the
help of technology sourced from Sumitomo of Japan and tie-ups with Hitachi and
Kusakabe (both of Japan), GFG and ATMC (of USA), etc. With 18 distribution and
processing centres across India, the company claims to have quite a few marquee
clients.
These also suggest there are hard assets in
the company. Thanks to its aggressive growth plans, the consolidated net sales
have grown at a compounded annual rate of 14 per cent in 10 years. The Ebitda
(earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation) margins have
remained healthy at 25-28.2 per cent in the past five years, and so have
consolidated net profits, with the exception of 2013-14, when net sales dropped
10 per cent and net profit by 93.5 per cent to only Rs 590.000 Millions from Rs 9070.000 Millions in FY13. The
last two quarters of FY14 saw a loss of Rs 58 Millions and Rs 200.000 Millions, respectively; the June quarter of 2014-15 also saw a higher
loss of Rs 1420.000 Millions.
The bigger problem, though, is the debt on the
company’s books, of Rs 36,000 Millions. It takes the enterprise value to around
Rs 40,000 Millions. Over these years, debt levels have also surged from just
under Rs 12,000 Millions in 2009-10 to Rs 35,380 Millions in 2013-14— the
debt-equity ratio was a high 3.86 in 2013-14.
With deteriorating financial performance, it
might become difficult to service debt obligations, say analysts. The arrest of
its vice-chairman has added to the woes. Though the company’s board has
approved plans to raise funds up to Rs 60000.000 Millions in
phases, the sharp fall in valuations suggest this might not be easy. Unless the
promoters, who hold 71.3 per cent stake (most of it being pledged) are able to
cough up large resources or are able to get along a strategic partner or
investor, the going will be difficult. The option is to significantly improve
the performance in the next three to four quarters, so as to be able to repay
short-term liabilities. Estimates peg the debt repayment at Rs 25000.000 Millions for FY15 and a similar amount in FY16.
A fund manager says there is an element of
doubt over prospects. That there are allegations of bribery suggests problems
in either accounting or other issues. “For us, any stock which is tainted is
better avoided,” he adds. While there might be value in the stock, given the
sharp decline, experts are advising caution. Says Alex Mathews, head of
research, Geojit BNP Paribas Financial Services, “Until clarity emerges, it is
prudent that investors avoid Bhushan Steel’s stock.”
Some do see an opportunity. Giriraj Daga,
adding strict caveats, says, “Bhushan Steel is high-risk, high-reward for
investors looking from a two-three years’ perspective but only below Rs 100
levels. While we are expecting the steel industry outlook to improve, we don’t
know how big the hole is in the books of Bhushan Steel. On an enterprise value
basis, its value should be Rs 420000.000-450000.000 Millions, looking at the gross block and the capital work-in-progress.
We believe it will be difficult for existing management to revive, as rating
agencies have also downgraded the debt. Bankers have limited options but to
take over the company and sell it to a third party who will bring in money.”
Experts say stock will be under pressure in
the near term. The good part, though, is that Bhushan is still a standard asset
for banks, as it has not defaulted on its obligations. However, time seems to
be running out.
EMBROILED IN
BRIBERY CASE, INDIA'S BHUSHAN SAYS SERVICING DEBT
NEW DELHI, Aug 12 (Reuters) - India's Bhushan
Steel Limited , a debt-ridden company whose managing director was arrested last
week in a bribery case, has so far been able to service its loans, its finance
director told Reuters on Tuesday.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI),
India's top crime-fighting agency, arrested Sudhir Kumar Jain, chairman of
state-run lender Syndicate Bank Limited this month over allegations he took
bribes to grant loan extensions to Bhushan Steel.
Bhushan Steel said last Thursday that Managing
Director Neeraj Singal had surrendered to the CBI to assist the investigation,
which has shed light on the dubious lending that has weakened the balance
sheets of India's state banks.
Family-controlled Bhushan Steel, which has its
main operations in the eastern state of Odisha, owes net debts of $5.86 billion
- eight times its equity market value of $732 million. It denies any wrongdoing
in the bribery case.
"As of date, there is no bad loan,"
Finance Director Nittin Johari said. "We are in talks with the
banks."
Johari said he expected clarity after a
meeting of lenders, including Punjab National Bank (PNB) and the State Bank of
India (SBI), on Aug. 18.
"All depends upon the banks, what they decide,
how they are going to support. Because everything is not on the company's
hands," Johari said by phone. "They are supporting the company but
let's see. After the meeting everything is going to be clear."
Shares in Bhushan Steel, founded in 1989 by
Brij Bhushan Singal and run by son Neeraj since 2002, have lost more than half
of their value since Jain's arrest.
Separately, Bhushan Steel said on Tuesday it
had posted a quarterly loss and that its board had approved the issue of
securities to raise up to $1 billion.
ASSET QUALITY
The finance ministry estimates that India's
dominant state banks will need $40 billion in fresh capital by 2018 to meet
international capital adequacy standards.
A committee appointed by the central bank in May
called corruption in state banks a major "public policy concern", and
recommended the federal government cut its stake in these banks to below 50
percent.
Total bank exposure to Bhushan Steel is about
400 billion rupees ($6.5 billion), according to top Indian lender SBI, which
has proposed to the lenders' consortium that a management agency be appointed
to oversee the company's operations.
Johari said teams were in place to run the
company along with founder chairman Brij Bhushan Singal.
About $386 million of its total debt matures
this fiscal year ending March 31 and $460 million in the next fiscal year.
The company has been in the news for various
accidents at its main 3 million-tonne-per-year steel plant in Odisha. At least
72 people have died in accidents since the commissioning of the plant in August
2006, according to a state regulator.
SBI Chairwoman Arundhati Bhattacharya has
said, however, that the plant is in good order.
"At least all of our lenders, engineers
and other experts on our panel who have visited have confirmed that the asset
is a very good quality asset," Bhattacharya said last week.
BANKS INCREASE
CONTROL, SCRUTINY OF BHUSHAN STEEL
New Delhi: Lenders to Bhushan Steel Limited have effectively taken charge of the company, and asked for three director posts on the company’s board (which will then have 14 members) apart from conducting a forensic audit of the company’s books and a concurrent one of its cash flows.
The first audit will find out whether the company hid something or has indulged in any malpractice, while the second will simply keep track of its cash.
Mint couldn’t immediately ascertain whether Bhushan Steel has agreed to induct three nominees of the banks into its board.
The move is a radical one for Indian banks that aren’t usually as aggressive, but it indicates a desire on their part to get tough on bad loans (or loans that run the risk of turning bad) in the banking system. It also comes amid recent moves by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) which has been investigating the issue of bad loans on the books of banks.
In early August, the federal investigating agency arrested S.K. Jain, chairman and managing director of Syndicate Bank, for demanding and receiving bribes to increase the credit limit of two companies—Bhushan Steel was one of them.
A consortium of 51 lenders has an exposure of around Rs.400000.000 Millions to Bhushan Steel and met on Monday to decide on ways to protect their exposure.
The lenders have asked the company to reduce debt and bring in more equity. The company was also asked to monetize its non-core assets within a definite time frame as part of the deleveraging exercise.
The bankers will also appoint an independent engineer to monitor the operations of the company and the projects, said a statement issued by Punjab National Bank, the lead lender.
Monday’s meeting was also attended by Brij Mohan Singhal, chairman of Bhushan Steel, and the company’s CFO. Vice-chairman Neeraj Singhal was arrested by CBI earlier this month.
Bhushan Steel, the sixth-largest Indian steel maker by capacity, produces about 2.2 million tonnes (mt) of mostly flat steel products at plants in Uttar Pradesh, Odisha and Maharashtra. Bhushan Steel has a net debt of Rs.317540.900 Millions as of 31 March, 12% higher than the Rs.283562.300 Millions debt it had a year earlier. The company’s debt-to-equity ratio, one of the highest in the industry, stood at 3.46 as on 31 March.
In the meeting, banks took stock of the performance of Bhushan Steel—production volume, turnover and the management. The company is said to have assured bankers that it is financially stable and there is no cause for worry.
Big lenders such as State Bank of India (SBI) and Punjab National Bank have sought representation on the board of the steel company, one of the bankers who attended the meeting said, speaking on condition of anonymity. He added that one of the big four firms will be asked to conduct the forensic and concurrent audit though the banks were, in general, satisfied with the operations of the company. Bhushan Steel has asked for more time to cut its debt and bring in equity. Meanwhile, the company has agreed to monetise its non-core assets, the statement said.
Lenders were considering appointing a management agency to focus on the Odisha unit of Bhushan Steel in Dhenkanal, Arundhati Bhattacharya, SBI chairman, had said earlier in the month, adding that the bank had an exposure of around Rs.60000.000 Millions to the steel company, but that there was no fear of it turning into a non-performing asset. Analysts said that Bhushan Steel Limited’s troubles can be traced to an ambitious capacity expansion in Odisha for a 5 million tonne (mt) integrated steel plant in 2007.
In November, there was an explosion near a blast furnace after which its phase III expansion operations of the Odisha plant were stopped on the direction of State Pollution Control Board, according to a Care Ratings report in March.
The production loss impacted sales and by the time the Pollution Control Board gave its consent in January to restart operations, the delay hit profitability and cash flows, the report added.
“There have been reported cost overruns on phase III project with the company spending Rs.75150.000 Millions (including exchange fluctuation of Rs.7770.000 Millions) on the project up to 31 December as against the estimated project cost of Rs.65830.000 Millions,” Care said.
Ananda Bhoumik, senior director at India Ratings, said there is a sense of urgency in Bhushan Steel’s case given the large exposure of the banking system to the company.
“If the banks actually manage to get the board seats, which is traditionally reserved for shareholders, it can be considered a good progress for creditor rights,” he said.
As of 31 March, the 40 listed banks had gross NPAs of Rs.2.42 trillion, up from Rs.1.8 trillion a year ago.
BANKS ASK BHUSHAN
TO SELL AND LEASE BACK CRITICAL ASSETS
August 20, 2014
A day after effectively taking charge of Bhushan Steel, lenders have delivered another punch. The bankers’ consortium, which met in New Delhi on Monday, has asked the troubled steel maker to sell and lease back some of its critical assets to reduce debt, as the borrower is finding it difficult to raise equity from the market.
This is part of the road map drawn by SBI Caps, the merchant banking arm of State Bank of India (SBI), for recovery of around Rs 400000.000 Millions that Bhushan Steel has borrowed from 35 lenders.
According to the plan, the steel company has been asked to deleverage by repaying debt. However, given the company’s present problems that led to a slide in its share price, raising equity through a qualified institutional placement was not a viable proposition at this point, a banker who attended Monday’s meeting told Business Standard.
The share price of Bhushan Steel has fallen 62 per cent since August 5. The shares closed at Rs 144.90 apiece on Tuesday.
Bankers said four assets, including a coke oven plant, had been identified by the steel company. It is not immediately known how much debt will be reduced through the sale and lease-back.
According to bankers, there is no dearth of buyers for the company’s facilities and SBI Caps is in the process of identifying prospective bidders, which might include global steel producers.
Banks have tightened their grip on the firm since its vice-chairman and managing director, Neeraj Singal, was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation on August 7 for allegedly bribing SK Jain, the now-suspended chairman and managing director of Syndicate Bank.
Bankers said the forensic audit, as decided by the consortium on Monday, would be done by an external agency and would seek to find out if the firm diverted the borrowed funds or used those for purposes other than those for which the loans were given.
It would also find out whether there was creation of genuine assets.
These steps were taken even as the loans continue to be standard on the books of banks and have not become non-performing. However, following the liquidity problem that Bhushan Steel, one of the most indebted steel makers of the country, is facing, the loan is now categorised as special mention account 2 that is overdue in 60 days.
A concurrent auditor will also be appointed to monitor cash flows on a daily basis and an independent engineer will look at the operations of the company.
“Given the magnitude of the exposure and the number of lenders involved, banks will take a huge hit if the loan turns bad,” said a senior executive of a public-sector bank.
BHUSHAN STEEL’S
LENDERS TO MEET SOON ON RS.400000.000 MILLIONS LOAN EXPOSURE
Mumbai: Concerned about the recent bribe-for-loan scam which has led to the arrests of top executives of Bhushan Steel Limited and Syndicate Bank, all lenders to the steel maker have stepped in to protect their exposure of about Rs.400000.000 Millions.
A consortium of 51 lenders to Bhushan Steel may meet next week to try to put in place a management agency to oversee the day-to-day running of the company, bank officials said on Friday at State Bank of India’s (SBI’s) first quarter results press conference.
“We are working with Punjab National Bank (PNB) to call a consortium meeting soon,” said Arundhati Bhattacharya, chief of SBI. PNB is the consortium leader. SBI’s exposure to the company is about Rs.60000.000 Millions, Bhattacharya said.
On Thursday, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) arrested Neeraj Singhal, vice-chairman of Bhushan Steel, and on Saturday, it arrested Syndicate Bank’s chairman S.K. Jain for allegedly taking a bribe of Rs.50 lakh for increasing the credit limit of some companies in violation of banking rules.
Bhushan Steel, the sixth largest Indian steel maker by capacity, produces about 2.2 million tonnes (mt) of mostly flat steel products with plants in Uttar Pradesh, Odisha and Maharashtra. The company, which is a prominent supplier of automotive body sheets, has a major expansion taking place in Odisha that would take its total installed capacity to 4.7mt, according to a CARE Ratings report dated 6 August.
“Bhushan Steel’s vice-chairman and managing director Mr. Neeraj Singhal has been named in a case registered by CBI in relation with extension of credit facilities by Syndicate Bank to the company. In view of the above development and the possible impact of the same on the credit risk profile of the company, CARE has placed the ratings on ‘Credit Watch’,” the CARE report said. “CARE is in discussion with the company on the above developments and would take necessary action when greater clarity emerges,” the report added. The management agency of the lenders would focus on the Odisha unit of Bhushan Steel in Dhenkanal where a fatal accident put the spotlight on the plant’s functioning. “We are planning to appoint a management agency to oversee the day-to-day running of the unit (in Odisha).”
SBI’s Bhattacharya said. Last November, when the plant caught fire, the lenders had advised the management to appoint a safety advisor and take all precautionary measures to avoid a repeat of the incident. However, SBI is not worried about its exposure to the company as it is a “good quality asset” for the bank, Bhattacharya added. The reason for putting the management agency is that the lenders “don’t want the unit to get into any kind of trouble or create trouble for others (lenders),” she said.
The bankers are not trying to change the management as “it is not so easy,” she said. On the sidelines of the meeting, a senior SBI official said the management consultant could be Alvarez and Marsal. Shares of Bhushan Steel closed on the BSE at Rs.219.35, down 9.99% from the previous close. Since last Friday, before the problem came to light, the shares have fallen 44.45%.
BHUSHAN STEEL LENDERS CONSIDER OPTIONS AS DEBT BALLOONS
MUMBAI: Lenders to Bhushan Steel say that the company's troubles got compounded following an explosion in its plant at Dhenkanel at the trial stage in November 2013. Although the plant was insured, the cover was not adequate to take care of the loss of profits following the subsequent closure by the pollution control board. One of the lenders who will be present at a crucial board meeting today said that given the drop in earnings lenders would ask for additional equity capital to be brought in to reduce debt service burden
While the company needs additional equity to improve its ratios, this would be a major challenge given the negative sentiment around its stock. Bhushan Steel one of the largest automotive steel makers in the country has seen its market capitalisation halve to Rs 34540.000 Millions. Banks have an exposure of close to Rs 400000.000 Millions in respect of the company. Lenders to the company led by Punjab National Bank and including State Bank of India are meeting in Delhi today to decide on appointing a managing agency to oversee operations after the company's CEO Neeraj Singhal was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation in a bribery scandal earlier this month. The bureau had earlier arrested Syndicate Bank chairman, SK Jain in the same case on charges of accepting bribes. The company had run up large debts in huge capacity expansions including the new plant at Orissa and acquisition of energy resources including Australia's Bowen Energy in 2009. Operations of the plant got hit also after the company was ordered to halt work for environmental reasons.
Last week Bhushan Steel reported a net loss of Rs 1410.000 Millions for the first quarter of FY15 down from a net profit of Rs 760.000 Millions in the corresponding quarter last year. The company had also announced plans to raise equity capital of close to $1bm. Officials said that as of last week the company's loans are not a non-performing assets and it would wait for the stance taken by bankers.
SBI WANTS EXTERNAL
AGENCY TO RUN BHUSHAN STEEL
A day after the arrest of Bhushan Steel vice chairman in the cash-for-loan case at Syndicate Bank, SBI - a big lender to the firm - said it will press for an external agency to take over the day-to-day management of the company.
"The suggestion that I have made, which has been accepted by the banks that I have talked to, is that we will try to bring in an external management agency who will oversee the day to day running of the company," State Bank of India Chairman Arundhati Bhattacharya said.
The bank has called for a meeting of the lenders' consortium next week to discuss the proposal, she added. The system has a whopping Rs 400000.000 Millions exposure to the Delhi-based Bhushan Steel through 51 lenders. There are two consortia, one on working capital loans led by SBI and the second on term-loans led by Punjab National Bank, representing the lenders' interests.
Bhattacharya said the bank has an exposure of Rs 60000.000 Millions to the steel-maker which is a standard asset at present. The company is embroiled in a controversy following the arrest of Syndicate Bank chairman and managing director SK Jain last week for allegedly receiving a bribe of Rs 5.000 lakh to enhance the credit limits of the company.
The CBI, which arrested Jain, also arrested Bhushan Steel's vice chairman and managing director Neeraj Singal yesterday. Bhattacharya said the Bhushan Steel plant in Odisha is running well and the lenders do not want to expose their assets to any difficulties as a result of the imbroglio.
BHUSHAN STEEL, CEAT TO RAISE FUNDS VIA QIP JULY 23, 2014
QIP seems to the new flavour of the companies looking to raise cash. Both Bhushan Steel and Ceat are planning to raise funds via qualified institutional placement (QIP). Bhushan Steel plans to raise Rs 15000.000-30000.000 Millions. The company would like to pare off their debt from this raised amount. Current debt for the company stands at Rs 280000.000 Millions. QIP may lead to an equity dilution of 25% for the company. Whereas Ceat plans to raise Rs 3000.000-4000.000 Millions and they too will pare their debt from the raised funds. The current debt for the company stands at Rs 9000.000 Millions. QIP may lead to an equity dilution of 13% for Ceat. Kotak is the likely banker that the company has appointed though the company refrained from commenting on market speculation.
ORISSA ORDERS BHUSHAN STEEL TO STOP ALL PROJECT ACTIVITIES AT
DHENKANAL, ANGUL FEBRUARY 2, 2014
Bhushan Steel Limited’s integrated steel project in Dhenkanal and Angul district of Orissa has hit a wall. The state forest department has ordered district collectors to stop all activities over the 61.48 hectares of forest land on which the company has built its plant. The forest department has moved against the project following a letter from the Assistant Inspector General of Forests to the state on December 30, 2013.
The divisional forest officer, Dhenkanal had reported that the company had constructed over 61.48 hectare of forest land violating FC Act, 1980 though the final approval order (Nov 13, 2006) was kept in abeyance by the ministry of environment.
The ministry in its letter had asked the State to initiate disciplinary proceedings against forest department officials who failed to restrain the company from utilising the forest land till it procured final approval under the Forest Conservation Act. The forest department has asked the district collectors to take action against Bhushans under Indian Forest Act, 1927 or relevant local Forest Act. The forestland on which the construction was done belong to the revenue and disaster management department.
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests JD Sharma said the MoEF order on
Bhushans is being complied with. Dhenkanal collector Roopa Sahoo, however, said
the state government is yet to take a call on that.
BHUSHAN STEEL POSTS RS 550.000 MILLIONS LOSS IN Q3
FEBRUARY 12, 2014
Income of the company fell to Rs 24071.600 Millions during the quarter from Rs 25290.700 Millions a year earlier. Expenditure, however, went up to Rs 20478.000 Millions from Rs 19546.800 Millions a year earlier.
Higher finance costs and lower income led Bhushan Steel into the red with the
firm reporting Rs 547.900 Millions net loss during the October-December
quarter. The company had clocked a Rs 2212.000 Millions net profit in the
corresponding quarter of the last fiscal, it said in a BSE filing. Income of
the company fell to Rs 24071.600 Millions during the quarter from Rs 25290.700
Millions a year earlier. Expenditure, however, went up to Rs 20478.000 Millions
from Rs 19546.800 Millions a year earlier. Meanwhile, finance costs of the
company also grew to Rs 4320.800 Millions from Rs 2930.100 Millions. Bhushan
Steel said due to explosion during the trial run of the second blast furnace at
its Meramandali plant in Odisha on November 13, 2013, the operation at the
blast furnace has remained suspended, resulting in loss of production.
SYNDICATE BANK- BHUSHAN
STEEL FIASCO: BANKS IN A SPOT OVER 'MISTAKEN IDENTITY'
MUMBAI: Is one of the
men arrested in the scandal over alleged bribes for higher loan limits the
victim of mistaken identity? Lenders certainly hope so. One of the two companies
said to be involved in the affair is Bhushan Steel Ltd — vice-chairman Neeraj
Singhal was among those arrested, apart from Syndicate Bank chairman and
managing director SK Jain.
Also held was
executive Arun Agarwal. But he doesn't work for Bhushan Steel, he's chief
financial officer of Bhushan Power and Steel, which is run by Neeraj Singhal's
brother Sanjay Singhal. To make the situation even more confusing, the brothers
have been rivals since they formalised a split of their businesses in 2011. Lenders
have already moved to try and make sure that the Rs 40,000 crore Bhushan owes
them isn't at risk by nominating members on the board to keep an eye on things.
However, they're also nervous about one of the men arrested, Agarwal, being the
CFO of Bhushan Power and Steel.
The banking
system has a total exposure of at least Rs 70,000 crore to both the companies.
They are not leaving anything to chance, just in case. "The consortium of
lenders has ordered a forensic audit," said the corporate banking head of
a private sector bank.
"The
companies have met us and conveyed that this is a clear case of mistaken
identity... We have no clarity and it is making us nervous. The CBI (Central
Bureau of Investigation) would not share any information as the investigation
is on." Bhushan Steel and Bhushan Power and Steel did not respond to
queries sent by email.
Agarwal, named
chief financial officer of BSL in the first information report (FIR) filed on
August 1, was arrested on August 4. The FIR said Agarwal and Neeraj Singhal met
Jain in his office and agreed to pay him to enhance the credit limit. According
to the FIR, Rs 10 lakh was transferred to an intermediary of Jain by Agarwal on
June 20.
But Agarwal's
comment has been misconstrued, bankers have been told. "The company has
said the CBI has taped conversation of Agarwal referring to Rs 10 lakh. The
company clarified that the conversation refers to the repayment of loans worth
Rs 10 lakh which was done on that day by Bhushan Power and Steel," said
one of the lenders in the consortium.
The Reserve
Bank of India (RBI) and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi)
should monitor company promoters, said Ashwin Parekh, partner, national leader,
global financial services, EY.
"The market regulator and the RBI should coordinate
to keep a tab on promoters and their relatives. The banking system is not as
vigilant as it should be on the promoters because of agents involved in loan
solicitation. Unlike the capital markets regulator, where large number of
investors are concerned, the check on the promoter is not there in the banking
system," said Parekh.
"Irrespective
of the promoters' background, the banking system is not recognising the value
of the underlying assets," he added. Life Insurance Corporation of India,
ICICI Bank and Punjab National Bank have each nominated a member on Bhushan
Steel's board. Banks are satisfied with the underlying collateral and assets.
OMC'S INPUT SUPPLY PLAN TO BENEFIT
BHUSHAN STEEL, JSL
The proposal of Odisha Mining Corporation (OMC) to ink raw material supply
pact with steel producers of the state is expected to benefit Bhushan
and Jindal groups, especially Jindal Stainless Ltd (JSL) and Visa Steel, which
will get iron ore and chromite supply assurance from the state-run miner
for a period of five years.
The state cabinet on Monday approved the proposal of OMC, which was based on a
ministerial committee report last year, to provide raw material linkage to
local industries. As per the proposal, OMC will provide 50 per cent of iron ore and 70 per cent of chrome ore produced by it at market rates to companies who
have signed MoUs with the state government and are currently in operation.
The state-run miner produces nearly two
million tonne iron ore and close to 800,000 tonne chrome ore every year.
The conditions to get five-year raw material linkage from OMC will benefit both
Bhushan Steel and Power Ltd and Bhushan Steel Ltd, Visa Steel which will be getting iron ore at market rate since
their plants are already in operation. Similarly, the move is expected to
benefit JSL for its stainless steel plant at Kalinganagar in the state. The
companies welcomed the move, but said the term ‘market rate’ was a cause of concern.
“The whole idea to ink a supply pact was to
get raw material at a reasonable price. If OMC has decided to supply ore at
market rates, then we have to see whether it will support our profit margin
given the current demand scenario for steel products,” said an official of a
large steel maker. In the post cabinet meeting briefing on Monday, the state
government stressed that the supply pact will be available only to MoU-signed
companies, which do not have captive raw material resources and have completed
plant construction.
Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd (BPSL) has
invested more than Rs 25,000 crore in Odisha as of now. The company has built a
2.4 million tonne per annum (mtpa) steel mill and 248 Mw captive power plant
(CPP) at Sambalpur.
Though the firm has been granted an iron ore
mine lease by the state government, it will take at least two years to use ore
from its captive mine. The company is currently sourcing iron ore from private
miners. Another Bhushan Group firm- Bhushan Steel Ltd has invested around Rs
24,000 crore. The company’s 3 mtpa integrated steel plant is in operations at
Meramundali near Dhenkanal.
The other major MoU signed steel players to
have commenced operation are JSL. It is currently running a one million tonne
stainless steel flat product plant at Kalinganagar. It is currently procuring
chrome ore by participating in online auction conducted by OMC, which often
result in stoking up of input prices, eating away the profit margin.
The company has sought chrome ore lease in
Odisha for its Kalinganagr plant and was also trying to strike a deal with OMC
for raw material supply.
Similarly, Visa Steel has operationalised a 0.55 mtpa steel plant and 75
Mw CPP at Kalinganagar. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd (JSPL), which has completed
construction of its 2.5 million tonne integrated steel plant at Angul, is also
vying for raw material linkages. Out of 49 steel players, who had signed MoUs
with the state government, 30 have started production on a partial scale. A
large chunk of investments have flown from small and medium firms with steel
making capacity of below one mtpa. In total, these companies have achieved a
combined steel output of 12.66 mtpa. The small steel players to have started
operation are Adhunik Metaliks Ltd, Narbheram Power & Steel Ltd, SMC Power
Generation Ltd, Maheswary Ispat and Aryan Ispat & Power Ltd to name a few.
None of these firms are producing finished steel products.
IDFC
SELLS 31 LAKH SHARES OF BHUSHAN STEEL
On September 03, 2014 IDFC Limited sold 31,08,000 shares of Bhushan Steel at Rs 95.95 on the NSE.
In the previous
trading session, the share closed at Rs 96.05, up Rs 4.55, or 4.97 percent. It
has touched a 52-week low of Rs 86.95.
The latest book
value of the company is Rs 395.02 per share. At current value, the
price-to-book value of the company was 0.24. The dividend yield of the company was 0.52 percent.
BANKS INCREASE CONTROL, SCRUTINY OF BHUSHAN STEEL
The first audit will
find out whether the company hid something or has indulged in any malpractice,
while the second will simply keep track of its cash.
Mint couldn’t immediately ascertain whether Bhushan Steel has agreed to
induct three nominees of the banks into its board.
The move is a
radical one for Indian banks that aren’t usually as aggressive, but it
indicates a desire on their part to get tough on bad loans (or loans that run
the risk of turning bad) in the banking system.
It also comes amid
recent moves by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) which has been
investigating the issue of bad loans on the books of banks.
In early August,
the federal investigating agency arrested S.K. Jain,
chairman and managing director of Syndicate Bank, for demanding and receiving
bribes to increase the credit limit of two companies—Bhushan Steel was one of
them.
A consortium of 51
lenders has an exposure of around Rs.40,000 crore to Bhushan Steel and met on Monday to
decide on ways to protect their exposure.
The lenders have
asked the company to reduce debt and bring in more equity. The company was also
asked to monetize its non-core assets within a definite time frame as part of
the deleveraging exercise.
The bankers will
also appoint an independent engineer to monitor the operations of the company
and the projects, said a statement issued by Punjab National Bank, the lead
lender.
Monday’s meeting
was also attended by Brij Mohan
Singhal, chairman of Bhushan Steel, and the company’s CFO.
Vice-chairman Neeraj Singhal was arrested by CBI earlier this month.
Bhushan Steel, the
sixth-largest Indian steel maker by capacity, produces about 2.2 million tonnes
(mt) of mostly flat steel products at plants in Uttar Pradesh, Odisha and
Maharashtra. Bhushan Steel has a net debt of Rs.31,754.09 crore as of 31 March, 12%
higher than the Rs.28,356.23
crore debt it had a year earlier. The company’s debt-to-equity ratio, one of
the highest in the industry, stood at 3.46 as on 31 March.
In the meeting,
banks took stock of the performance of Bhushan Steel—production volume,
turnover and the management. The company is said to have assured bankers that
it is financially stable and there is no cause for worry.
Big lenders such
as State Bank of
India (SBI) and Punjab
National Bank have sought representation on the board of the
steel company, one of the bankers who attended the meeting said, speaking on
condition of anonymity. He added that one of the big four firms will be asked
to conduct the forensic and concurrent audit though the banks were, in general,
satisfied with the operations of the company.
Bhushan Steel has
asked for more time to cut its debt and bring in equity. Meanwhile, the company
has agreed to monetise its non-core assets, the statement said.
Lenders were
considering appointing a management agency to focus on the Odisha unit of
Bhushan Steel in Dhenkanal, Arundhati
Bhattacharya, SBI chairman, had said earlier in the month,
adding that the bank had an exposure of around Rs.6,000 crore to the steel company,
but that there was no fear of it turning into a non-performing asset.
Analysts said that
Bhushan Steel Ltd’s troubles can be traced to an ambitious capacity expansion
in Odisha for a 5 million tonne (mt) integrated steel plant in 2007.
In November, there
was an explosion near a blast furnace after which its phase III expansion
operations of the Odisha plant were stopped on the direction of State Pollution
Control Board, according to a Care Ratings report in March.
The production
loss impacted sales and by the time the Pollution Control Board gave its
consent in January to restart operations, the delay hit profitability and cash
flows, the report added.
“There have been
reported cost overruns on phase III project with the company spending Rs.7,515 crore
(including exchange fluctuation of Rs.777 crore) on the project up to 31
December as against the estimated project cost of Rs.6,583 crore,” Care said.
Ananda Bhoumik,
senior director at India Ratings, said there is a sense of urgency in Bhushan
Steel’s case given the large exposure of the banking system to the company.
“If the banks
actually manage to get the board seats, which is traditionally reserved for
shareholders, it can be considered a good progress for creditor rights,” he
said.
As of 31 March,
the 40 listed banks had gross NPAs of Rs.2.42 trillion, up from Rs.1.8 trillion a
year ago.
CMT REPORT (Corruption, Money Laundering & Terrorism]
The Public Notice information has been collected from various sources
including but not limited to: The Courts,
1] INFORMATION ON
DESIGNATED PARTY
No exist designating subject or any of its beneficial owners,
controlling shareholders or senior officers as terrorist or terrorist
organization or whom notice had been received that all financial transactions
involving their assets have been blocked or convicted, found guilty or against
whom a judgement or order had been entered in a proceedings for violating
money-laundering, anti-corruption or bribery or international economic or
anti-terrorism sanction laws or whose assets were seized, blocked, frozen or
ordered forfeited for violation of money laundering or international
anti-terrorism laws.
2] Court Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that subject is
or was the subject of any formal or informal allegations, prosecutions or other
official proceeding for making any prohibited payments or other improper
payments to government officials for engaging in prohibited transactions or
with designated parties.
3] Asset Declaration :
No records exist to suggest that the property or assets of the subject
are derived from criminal conduct or a prohibited transaction.
4] Record on Financial
Crime :
Charges or conviction
registered against subject: None
5] Records on Violation of
Anti-Corruption Laws :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
6] Records on Int’l
Anti-Money Laundering Laws/Standards :
Charges or
investigation registered against subject: None
7] Criminal Records
No
available information exist that suggest that subject or any of its principals have
been formally charged or convicted by a competent governmental authority for
any financial crime or under any formal investigation by a competent government
authority for any violation of anti-corruption laws or international anti-money
laundering laws or standard.
8] Affiliation with
Government :
No record
exists to suggest that any director or indirect owners, controlling
shareholders, director, officer or employee of the company is a government
official or a family member or close business associate of a Government
official.
9] Compensation Package :
Our market
survey revealed that the amount of compensation sought by the subject is fair
and reasonable and comparable to compensation paid to others for similar
services.
10] Press Report :
No press reports / filings exists on
the subject.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MIRA INFORM as part of its Due Diligence do provide comments on
Corporate Governance to identify management and governance. These factors often
have been predictive and in some cases have created vulnerabilities to credit
deterioration.
Our Governance Assessment focuses principally on the interactions
between a company’s management, its Board of Directors, Shareholders and other
financial stakeholders.
CONTRAVENTION
Subject is not known to have contravened any existing local laws,
regulations or policies that prohibit, restrict or otherwise affect the terms
and conditions that could be included in the agreement with the subject.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.60.77 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.100.72 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.80.56 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Information
Gathered by : |
HTL |
|
|
|
|
Analysis Done by
: |
SUB |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
NKT |
SCORE & RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
SCORE FACTORS |
RANGE |
POINTS |
|
HISTORY |
1~10 |
4 |
|
PAID-UP CAPITAL |
1~10 |
5 |
|
OPERATING SCALE |
1~10 |
4 |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION |
|
|
|
--BUSINESS SCALE |
1~10 |
4 |
|
--PROFITABILIRY |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--LIQUIDITY |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--LEVERAGE |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--RESERVES |
1~10 |
4 |
|
--CREDIT LINES |
1~10 |
3 |
|
--MARGINS |
-5~5 |
- |
|
DEMERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--BANK CHARGES |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--LITIGATION |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--OTHER ADVERSE INFORMATION |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
MERIT POINTS |
|
|
|
--SOLE DISTRIBUTORSHIP |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--EXPORT ACTIVITIES |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--AFFILIATION |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
--LISTED |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--OTHER MERIT FACTORS |
YES/NO |
YES |
|
DEFAULTER |
|
|
|
--RBI |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
--EPF |
YES/NO |
NO |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
33 |
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s credit risk
and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a
composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report.
The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated through %) are as
follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend
(10%) Operational
size (10%)
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to
overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively below average. |
Small |
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with full
security |
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL)
or its officials.