|
Report No. : |
314518 |
|
Report Date : |
14.04.2015 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
DASSAULT SYSTEMS K.K. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
Thinkpark Tower 20F, 2-1-1 Osaki
Shinagawaku, Tokyo 141-0032 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Japan |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.03.2014 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
June 1994 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Not Available |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Production/Selling/Consulting of 3D design
Software. |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
360 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ba |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
Maximum Credit Limit : |
Yen 248.6 Million |
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
No Complaints |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES:
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – December 31, 2014
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (30.09.2014) |
Current Rating (31.12.2014) |
|
Japan |
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
JAPAN - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
In the years following World War
II, government-industry cooperation, a strong work ethic, mastery of high
technology, and a comparatively small defense allocation (1% of GDP) helped
Japan develop a technologically advanced economy. Two notable characteristics
of the post-war economy were the close interlocking structures of
manufacturers, suppliers, and distributors, known as keiretsu, and the
guarantee of lifetime employment for a substantial portion of the urban labor
force. Both features are now eroding under the dual pressures of global
competition and domestic demographic change. Japan's industrial sector is
heavily dependent on imported raw materials and fuels. A small agricultural
sector is highly subsidized and protected, with crop yields among the highest
in the world. While self-sufficient in rice production, Japan imports about 60%
of its food on a caloric basis. For three decades, overall real economic growth
had been spectacular - a 10% average in the 1960s, a 5% average in the 1970s,
and a 4% average in the 1980s. Growth slowed markedly in the 1990s, averaging
just 1.7%, largely because of the after effects of inefficient investment and
an asset price bubble in the late 1980s that required a protracted period of
time for firms to reduce excess debt, capital, and labor. Modest economic
growth continued after 2000, but the economy has fallen into recession three
times since 2008. A sharp downturn in business investment and global demand for
Japan's exports in late 2008 pushed Japan into recession. Government stimulus
spending helped the economy recover in late 2009 and 2010, but the economy
contracted again in 2011 as the massive 9.0 magnitude earthquake and the
ensuing tsunami in March disrupted manufacturing. The economy has largely
recovered in the two years since the disaster, but reconstruction in the Tohoku
region has been uneven. Prime Minister Shinzo ABE has declared the economy his
government's top priority; he has overturned his predecessor's plan to
permanently close nuclear power plants and is pursuing an economic revitalization
agenda of fiscal stimulus, monetary easing, and structural reform. Japan joined
the Trans Pacific Partnership negotiations in 2013, a pact that would open
Japan's economy to increased foreign competition and create new export
opportunities for Japanese businesses. Measured on a purchasing power parity
(PPP) basis that adjusts for price differences, Japan in 2013 stood as the
fourth-largest economy in the world after second-place China, which surpassed
Japan in 2001, and third-place India, which edged out Japan in 2012. The new
government will continue a longstanding debate on restructuring the economy and
reining in Japan's huge government debt, which is exceeding 230% of GDP. To
help raise government revenue and reduce public debt, Japan decided in 2013 to
gradually increase the consumption tax to a total of 10% by the year 2015.
Japan is making progress on ending deflation due to a weaker yen and higher
energy costs, but reliance on exports to drive growth and an aging, shrinking
population pose other major long-term challenges for the economy.
|
Source
: CIA |
|
ENGLISH COMPANY NAME |
DASSAULT SYSTEMS K.K. |
||||
|
Japanese company name |
DASSAULT SYSTEMS KK |
||||
|
Registered Office |
|||||
|
1. Street Number and District |
Thinkpark Tower 20F, 2-1-1 Osaki
Shinagawaku |
||||
|
2. City and Perefecture |
Tokyo |
||||
|
3. ZIP Code |
141-0032 |
||||
|
4. Country |
JAPAN |
||||
|
TEL |
03-4321-3500 |
||||
|
FAX |
03-4321-3501 |
||||
|
URL |
|||||
|
Email Address |
thru the URL |
||||
|
Activities (Services & Products) |
Production/Selling/Consulting of 3D design
software. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY OF
REPORT |
|||||
|
Annual Sales (MM
YEN) |
39,408 |
*It is actual results of 2013 fiscal term. |
|||
|
Capital Amount
(MM YEN) |
2,746 |
||||
|
Net Worth (MM
YEN) |
Unavailable |
||||
|
FINANCES |
FAIR |
||||
|
TREND |
UP |
||||
|
EMPLOYEES |
360 |
||||
|
CREDIT LIMIT
PROPOSED(MM YEN) |
248.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
INFORMATION FOLLOWS: |
|||||
|
Year Started |
1994 |
||||
|
Month and Year Registered |
Jun. 1994 |
||||
|
Regd No. |
|||||
|
Major Shareholders |
|||||
|
1 |
Dassult Systems (100%) |
||||
|
Number of Shareholders |
1 |
||||
|
Authorized Shares |
30,000 |
||||
|
Issued Shares |
23,446 |
||||
|
Executives |
|||||
|
PRESIDENT |
SYLVAIN LAURENT |
||||
|
Director |
Seiji Kariya |
||||
|
Director |
Valerie Rauldespres |
||||
|
Main Banks |
|||||
|
1 |
MUFG (Tamachi) |
||||
|
Relations |
Satisfactory |
||||
|
Clients |
|||||
|
1 |
Toyota Motor Corporation |
||||
|
2 |
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. |
||||
|
3 |
Argo Graphics Inc. |
||||
|
4 |
Otsuka Corporation |
||||
|
5 |
Other |
||||
|
Suppliers |
|||||
|
1 |
N/A |
||||
|
Branches |
|||||
|
1 |
Nagoya |
||||
|
2 |
Osaka |
||||
|
3 |
Toyota (Aichi) |
||||
|
Factories |
|||||
|
1 |
None |
||||
|
Overseas |
|||||
|
1 |
France |
||||
|
HIGHLIGHT and COMMENT |
The subject company is the Japanese subsidary of French software company, Dassault Systems S.A. It specializes in the production of 3D design software,3D digital mock-up and product lifecycle management solutions. It also offers social and collaboration and information and intelligence products. It has clients all over the world and the clients include earospace, manufacturing industry, auto manufacturers and heavy industry, other. |
||||
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Finance
partially disclosed |
||||
|
Any figures
below for the fiscal term of 2014 are estimates. |
|||||
|
PLEASE
ATTACH THE FINANCIALS BELOW. |
|||||
|
Note:
Forecast (or estimated) figures for the 31/12/2015 fiscal term |
|||||
|
Terms
Ending: |
31/03/2015 |
31/03/2014 |
31/03/2013 |
31/03/2012 |
|
|
Annual Sales |
42,624 |
40,984 |
39,408 |
36,279 |
|
|
Recur. Profit |
.. |
.. |
.. |
.. |
|
|
Net Profit |
1,566 |
1,506 |
1,448 |
1,492 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Worth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital, Paid-Up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Div.P.Share(¥) |
|
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
<Analytical
Data> |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
|
|
S.Growth Rate |
4.00 |
4.00 |
8.62 |
#DIV/0! |
|
|
Current Ratio |
|
.. |
.. |
.. |
|
|
N.Worth Ratio |
|
.. |
.. |
.. |
|
|
N.Profit/Sales |
3.67 |
3.67 |
3.67 |
4.11 |
|
|
Filename
(English Title) |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Terms Ending: |
31/03/2015 |
31/03/2014 |
31/03/2013 |
31/03/2012 |
31/03/2011 |
31/03/2010 |
|
|
Annual Sales |
42,624 |
40,984 |
39,408 |
36,279 |
|
||
|
Recur. Profit |
.. |
.. |
.. |
.. |
.. |
||
|
Net Profit |
1,566 |
1,506 |
1,448 |
1,492 |
|
||
|
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Net Worth |
|
|
|
|
-4,446 |
-4,446 |
|
|
Capital, Paid-Up |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Div.P.Share(¥) |
|
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
||
|
<Analytical
Data> |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
|
|
S.Growth Rate |
4.00 |
4.00 |
8.62 |
.. |
.. |
.. |
|
|
Current Ratio |
|
.. |
.. |
.. |
.. |
.. |
|
|
N.Worth Ratio |
|
.. |
.. |
.. |
.. |
.. |
|
|
N.Profit/Sales |
3.67 |
3.67 |
3.67 |
4.11 |
.. |
.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S/Hldrs' Equity |
-1,506 |
-2,954 |
-4,446 |
-4,446 |
|||
|
Div or Taxes |
|||||||
|
Offs' Bonus |
|||||||
|
Current Assets |
|||||||
|
Current Liabs |
|||||||
|
Credit Limit |
248.6 |
||||||
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.62.39 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.91.05 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.66.16 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Analysis Done by
: |
RAS |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
TPT |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable
factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of
interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall
operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
|
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s
credit risk and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated
from a composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of
this report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated
through %) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend (10%) Operational size
(10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL) or
its officials.