|
Report No. : |
329109 |
|
Report Date : |
27.06.2015 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
CHONG BROTHERS GENERAL CONTRACTOR PTE LTD |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
25, Mandai Estate, 04-06, Innovation Place, 729930 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Singapore
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.08.2009 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
14.06.1995 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
199504105-R |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Exempt Private |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Subject is engaged in the general contractors (building construction
including major upgrading works). |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
115 [2015] |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
Ca |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Unknown |
|
Litigation : |
Exist |
NOTES:
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – March 31, 2015
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.12.2014) |
Current Rating (31.03.2015) |
|
Singapore |
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
SINGAPORE - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
Singapore has a highly developed and successful free-market
economy. It enjoys a remarkably open and corruption-free environment, stable
prices, and a per capita GDP higher than that of most developed countries.
Unemployment is very low. The economy depends heavily on exports, particularly
of consumer electronics, information technology products, medical and optical
devices, pharmaceuticals, and on its vibrant transportation, business, and
financial services sectors. The economy contracted 0.6% in 2009 as a result of
the global financial crisis, but has continued to grow since 2010 on the
strength of renewed exports. Growth in 2014 was slower at 2.9%, largely a
result of soft demand for exports amid a sluggish global economy and weak
growth in Singapore’s manufacturing sector. The government is attempting to
restructure Singapore’s economy by weaning its dependence on foreign labor,
addressing weak productivity, and increasing Singaporean wages. Singapore has attracted
major investments in pharmaceuticals and medical technology production and will
continue efforts to strengthen its position as Southeast Asia's leading
financial and high-tech hub. Singapore is a member of the 12-nation
Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade negotiations, the Regional Comprehensive
Economic Partnership negotiations with the nine other ASEAN members plus
Australia, China, India, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand, and in 2015,
Singapore will form, with the other ASEAN members, the ASEAN Economic
Community.
|
Source
: CIA |
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
|
|
REGISTRATION NO. |
: |
199504105-R |
|
COMPANY NAME |
: |
CHONG BROTHERS GENERAL CONTRACTOR PTE LTD |
|
FORMER NAME |
: |
N/A |
|
INCORPORATION DATE |
: |
14/06/1995 |
|
COMPANY STATUS |
: |
EXIST |
|
LEGAL FORM |
: |
EXEMPT PRIVATE |
|
LISTED STATUS |
: |
NO |
|
REGISTERED ADDRESS |
: |
25, MANDAI ESTATE, 04-06, INNOVATION PLACE, 729930, SINGAPORE. |
|
BUSINESS ADDRESS |
: |
25 MANDAI ESTATE #04-06 INNOVATION PLACE,, 729930, SINGAPORE. |
|
TEL.NO. |
: |
65-64632268 |
|
FAX.NO. |
: |
N/A |
|
CONTACT PERSON |
: |
ALBERT NEO HEE SONG ( DIRECTOR ) |
|
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITY |
: |
GENERAL CONTRACTORS (BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING MAJOR UPGRADING
WORKS) |
|
ISSUED AND PAID UP CAPITAL |
: |
1,500,000.00 ORDINARY SHARE, OF A VALUE OF SGD 1,500,000.00 |
|
SALES |
: |
N/A |
|
NET WORTH |
: |
N/A |
|
STAFF STRENGTH |
: |
115 [2015] |
|
LITIGATION |
: |
TRACED |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION |
: |
N/A |
|
PAYMENT |
: |
N/A |
|
MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY |
: |
AVERAGE |
|
COMMERCIAL RISK |
: |
HIGH |
|
CURRENCY EXPOSURE |
: |
N/A |
|
GENERAL REPUTATION |
: |
SATISFACTORY |
|
INDUSTRY OUTLOOK |
: |
AVERAGE GROWTH |
HISTORY
/ BACKGROUND
|
The Subject is an exempt private company whose shares are not held by
any corporate body and has no more than 20 shareholders who are all natural persons.
An exempt company is a type of private limited company. A private limited
company is a separate legal entity from its shareholders. As a separate legal
entity, the Subject is capable of owning assets, entering into contracts, suing
or be sued by other companies. An exempt private company with an annual
turnover of less than SGD5 million are exempted from statutory auditing
requirements. Instead of filing audited annual accounts, the Subject has to
file in a document duly signed by its director in charge of its finance and the
company secretary stating that the Subject is able to meet all its obligations
as and when they fall due. The Subject is not required to have their accounts
audited. However, the Subject will prepare unaudited accounts for purposes of
AGMs and filing with Registry Office if it is unable to meet all its
obligations as and when they fall due.
The Subject is principally engaged in the (as a / as an) general
contractors (building construction including major upgrading works).
Share Capital History
|
Date |
Issue & Paid Up Capital |
|
25/06/2015 |
SGD 1,500,000.00 |
The major shareholder(s) of the Subject are shown as follows :
Name |
Address |
IC/PP/Loc No |
Shareholding |
(%) |
|
CHONG YEEM KWOI + |
236, MILTONIA CLOSE, SHAUGHNESSY, THE\, 768304, SINGAPORE. |
S2558403A |
500,000.00 |
33.33 |
|
TAN KIM HUAT + |
384, MILTONIA CLOSE, SHAUGHNESSY, THE, 768378, SINGAPORE. |
S2626453G |
500,000.00 |
33.33 |
|
NEO HEE SONG + |
22, WILBY ROAD, 10-19, TESSARINA, THE, 276306, SINGAPORE. |
S2604392A |
500,000.00 |
33.33 |
|
--------------- |
------ |
|||
|
1,500,000.00 |
100.00 |
|||
|
============ |
===== |
+ Also Director
DIRECTORS
|
DIRECTOR 1
|
Name Of Subject |
: |
CHONG YEEM KWOI |
|
Address |
: |
236, MILTONIA CLOSE, SHAUGHNESSY, THE\, 768304, SINGAPORE. |
|
IC / PP No |
: |
S2558403A |
|
Nationality |
: |
SINGAPOREAN |
|
Date of Appointment |
: |
22/06/1995 |
DIRECTOR 2
|
Name Of Subject |
: |
TAN KIM HUAT |
|
Address |
: |
384, MILTONIA CLOSE, SHAUGHNESSY, THE, 768378, SINGAPORE. |
|
IC / PP No |
: |
S2626453G |
|
Nationality |
: |
SINGAPOREAN |
|
Date of Appointment |
: |
14/06/1995 |
DIRECTOR 3
|
Name Of Subject |
: |
NEO HEE SONG |
|
Address |
: |
22, WILBY ROAD, 10-19, TESSARINA, THE, 276306, SINGAPORE. |
|
IC / PP No |
: |
S2604392A |
|
Nationality |
: |
SINGAPOREAN |
|
Date of Appointment |
: |
29/07/2008 |
MANAGEMENT
|
|
1) |
Name of Subject |
: |
ALBERT NEO HEE SONG |
|
Position |
: |
DIRECTOR |
|
AUDITOR
|
|
Auditor |
: |
ACHIEVE PAC |
|
Auditor' Address |
: |
N/A |
COMPANY
SECRETARIES
|
|
1) |
Company Secretary |
: |
NEO HEE SONG |
|
IC / PP No |
: |
S2604392A |
|
|
Address |
: |
22, WILBY ROAD, 10-19, TESSARINA, THE, 276306, SINGAPORE. |
|
BANKING
|
No Banker found in our databank.
ENCUMBRANCE
(S)
|
|
Charge No |
Creation Date |
Charge Description |
Chargee Name |
Total Charge |
Status |
|
C201204061 |
13/04/2012 |
N/A |
DBS BANK LTD. |
- |
Unsatisfied |
|
C201204062 |
13/04/2012 |
N/A |
DBS BANK LTD. |
- |
Unsatisfied |
|
C201204068 |
13/04/2012 |
N/A |
DBS BANK LTD. |
- |
Unsatisfied |
|
C201204092 |
16/04/2012 |
N/A |
DBS BANK LTD. |
- |
Unsatisfied |
LITIGATION
CHECK AGAINST SUBJECT
|
* A check has been conducted in our databank against the Subject whether the
subject has been involved in any litigation.
|
LEGAL ACTION |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Code No |
: |
99 |
Case No |
: |
1127 |
|||||||||||
|
Year |
: |
2006 |
Place |
: |
SINGAPORE |
|||||||||||
|
Court |
: |
DISTRICT COURT |
||||||||||||||
|
Date Filed |
: |
24/03/2006 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor |
: |
ANIDHA SUBRAMANIAN THOMAS |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Ref |
: |
KR.1489.12.04.ACC/DF/D |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Firm |
: |
K RAVI ASSOCIATES |
||||||||||||||
|
Plaintiff |
: |
BABUL MIAH ANOWAR ALI |
||||||||||||||
|
Defendants |
: |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Remark |
: |
NEGLIGENCE |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Code No |
: |
99 |
Case No |
: |
14949 |
|||||||||||
|
Year |
: |
2006 |
Place |
: |
SINGAPORE |
|||||||||||
|
Court |
: |
MAGISTRATE COURT |
||||||||||||||
|
Date Filed |
: |
20/06/2006 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor |
: |
KANGATHARAN KANDAVELLU |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Ref |
: |
TIC.MM.KK.5998.2005 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Firm |
: |
TITO ISAAC & CO. |
||||||||||||||
|
Plaintiff |
: |
CINNAIAH MARIAPPAN |
||||||||||||||
|
Defendants |
: |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amount Claimed |
: |
200 |
||||||||||||||
|
Nature of Claim |
: |
SGD |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Code No |
: |
99 |
Case No |
: |
1679 |
|||||||||||
|
Year |
: |
2006 |
Place |
: |
SINGAPORE |
|||||||||||
|
Court |
: |
DISTRICT COURT |
||||||||||||||
|
Date Filed |
: |
08/05/2006 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor |
: |
SHANKER KUMAR K |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Ref |
: |
20068008004PI |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Firm |
: |
HOH LAW CORPORATION |
||||||||||||||
|
Plaintiff |
: |
MD SOYEBUL ISLAM MAMUN MD ABDUL HANNAN |
||||||||||||||
|
Defendants |
: |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amount Claimed |
: |
250000 |
||||||||||||||
|
Nature of Claim |
: |
SGD |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Code No |
: |
99 |
Case No |
: |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
Year |
: |
2006 |
Place |
: |
SINGAPORE |
|||||||||||
|
Court |
: |
DISTRICT COURT |
||||||||||||||
|
Date Filed |
: |
05/01/2006 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor |
: |
HOH CHIN CHA |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Ref |
: |
20041000648PI |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Firm |
: |
HOH LAW CORPORATION |
||||||||||||||
|
Plaintiff |
: |
YEAKUB ALI LATE ALAM CHANBEPARI |
||||||||||||||
|
Defendants |
: |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amount Claimed |
: |
250000 |
||||||||||||||
|
Nature of Claim |
: |
SGD |
||||||||||||||
|
Remark |
: |
NEGLIGENCE |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Code No |
: |
99 |
Case No |
: |
1426 |
|||||||||||
|
Year |
: |
2007 |
Place |
: |
SINGAPORE |
|||||||||||
|
Court |
: |
DISTRICT COURT |
||||||||||||||
|
Date Filed |
: |
04/05/2007 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor |
: |
KANGATHARAN KANDAVELLU |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Ref |
: |
TIC.MM.KK.5998.2005 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Firm |
: |
TITO ISAAC & CO. |
||||||||||||||
|
Plaintiff |
: |
CINNAIAH MARIAPPAN |
||||||||||||||
|
Defendants |
: |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amount Claimed |
: |
200 |
||||||||||||||
|
Nature of Claim |
: |
SGD |
||||||||||||||
|
Remark |
: |
TORT - NEGLIGENCE |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Code No |
: |
99 |
Case No |
: |
7265 |
|||||||||||
|
Year |
: |
2007 |
Place |
: |
SINGAPORE |
|||||||||||
|
Court |
: |
MAGISTRATE COURT |
||||||||||||||
|
Date Filed |
: |
30/03/2007 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor |
: |
HARBANS SINGH |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Ref |
: |
HS/483/06 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Firm |
: |
HAR ASSOCIATES |
||||||||||||||
|
Plaintiff |
: |
MAHABUB MR ASAD |
||||||||||||||
|
Defendants |
: |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amount Claimed |
: |
50000 |
||||||||||||||
|
Nature of Claim |
: |
SGD |
||||||||||||||
|
Remark |
: |
NEGLIGENCE |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Code No |
: |
99 |
Case No |
: |
6 |
|||||||||||
|
Year |
: |
2009 |
Place |
: |
SINGAPORE |
|||||||||||
|
Court |
: |
MAGISTRATE COURT |
||||||||||||||
|
Date Filed |
: |
01/01/2009 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor |
: |
RAJENDRAN PRASANNA PRABHAKARAN |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Ref |
: |
8184 8184 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Firm |
: |
RAJ PRASANNA & PARTNERS RAJ PRASANNA & P |
||||||||||||||
|
Plaintiff |
: |
VEERAPPAN MEYYAPPAN KANTHOSAMY |
||||||||||||||
|
Defendants |
: |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amount Claimed |
: |
40000 |
||||||||||||||
|
Nature of Claim |
: |
SGD |
||||||||||||||
|
Remark |
: |
TORT-NEGLIGENCE |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Code No |
: |
99 |
Case No |
: |
841 |
|||||||||||
|
Year |
: |
2011 |
Place |
: |
SINGAPORE |
|||||||||||
|
Court |
: |
DISTRICT COURT |
||||||||||||||
|
Date Filed |
: |
14/03/2011 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Ref |
: |
20111001138PI |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Firm |
: |
HOH LAW CORPORATION |
||||||||||||||
|
Plaintiff |
: |
HUANG LONGSHENG |
||||||||||||||
|
Defendants |
: |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amount Claimed |
: |
250000 |
||||||||||||||
|
Nature of Claim |
: |
SGD |
||||||||||||||
|
Remark |
: |
TORT-NEGLIGENCE |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Code No |
: |
99 |
Case No |
: |
22973 |
|||||||||||
|
Year |
: |
2013 |
Place |
: |
SINGAPORE |
|||||||||||
|
Court |
: |
MAGISTRATE COURT |
||||||||||||||
|
Date Filed |
: |
22/10/2013 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor |
: |
SHARMA KIRPAL SINGH |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Ref |
: |
KS/3490/12/PD (CHM)-IG |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Firm |
: |
ISLAND LAW LLC |
||||||||||||||
|
Plaintiff |
: |
ONG GEE GUAN RAYMOND |
||||||||||||||
|
Defendants |
: |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amount Claimed |
: |
5553 |
||||||||||||||
|
Nature of Claim |
: |
SGD |
||||||||||||||
|
Remark |
: |
NEGLIGENCE |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Code No |
: |
99 |
Case No |
: |
520 |
|||||||||||
|
Year |
: |
2014 |
Place |
: |
SINGAPORE |
|||||||||||
|
Court |
: |
DISTRICT COURT |
||||||||||||||
|
Date Filed |
: |
20/02/2014 |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor |
: |
PILLAI SUBBIAH |
||||||||||||||
|
Solicitor Firm |
: |
COSMAS LLC |
||||||||||||||
|
Plaintiff |
: |
RAHIZUL KARIM ISMAIL HOSSAIN |
||||||||||||||
|
Defendants |
: |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Amount Claimed |
: |
250000 |
||||||||||||||
|
Nature of Claim |
: |
SGD |
||||||||||||||
|
Remark |
: |
NEGLIGENCE |
||||||||||||||
|
No winding up petition was found in our databank |
||
PAYMENT
RECORD
|
|
||
|
SOURCES OF RAW MATERIALS: |
||
|
Local |
: |
N/A |
|
Overseas |
: |
N/A |
The Subject refused to disclose its suppliers.
CLIENTELE
|
|
Local |
: |
YES |
Percentage |
: |
100% |
|
Domestic Markets |
: |
SINGAPORE |
|||
|
Overseas |
: |
NO |
|||
|
Credit Term |
: |
PROGRESSIVE PAYMENTS |
|||
|
Payment Mode |
: |
CHEQUES |
|||
OPERATIONS
|
|
Services |
: |
GENERAL CONTRACTORS (BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING MAJOR UPGRADING
WORKS) |
|
|
Total Number of Employees: |
|||||||||
|
YEAR |
2015 |
||||||||
|
GROUP |
N/A |
||||||||
|
COMPANY |
115 |
||||||||
|
Branch |
: |
NO |
Other Information:
The Subject is principally engaged in the (as a / as an) general contractors
(building construction including major upgrading works).
The Subject refused to disclose its operation.
CURRENT
INVESTIGATION
|
Latest fresh investigations carried out on the Subject indicated that :
|
Telephone Number Provided By Client |
: |
6463 2268 |
|
Current Telephone Number |
: |
65-64632268 |
|
Match |
: |
YES |
|
Address Provided by Client |
: |
25 MANDAI ESTATE, #04-06, INNOVATION PLACE TOWER 1, SINGAPORE |
|
Current Address |
: |
25 MANDAI ESTATE #04-06 INNOVATION PLACE,, 729930, SINGAPORE. |
|
Match |
: |
NO |
Other Investigations
We contacted one of the staff from the Subject and he provided limited
information.
He refused to disclose the fax number.
The address provided is incomplete.
FINANCIAL
ANALYSIS
|
|
The Subject is a private exempt company which does not need to file in
its accounts with the Registrar of Companies for the information of the
public. Therefore, we are not able to comment on the Subject's financial
performance. |
||||||
|
Overall financial condition of the Subject : N/A |
||||||
|
|
||||||
SINGAPORE
ECONOMIC / INDUSTRY OUTLOOK
|
|
Major Economic Indicators : |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
|
|
|||||
|
Population (Million) |
4.98 |
5.08 |
5.18 |
5.31 |
5.40 |
|
Gross Domestic Products ( % ) |
(0.8) |
14.5 |
4.9 |
1.3 |
3.7 |
|
Consumer Price Index |
0.6 |
2.8 |
5.2 |
4.6 |
2.4 |
|
Total Imports (Million) |
356,299.3 |
423,221.8 |
459,655.1 |
474,554.0 |
466,762.0 |
|
Total Exports (Million) |
391,118.1 |
478,840.7 |
514,741.2 |
510,329.0 |
513,391.0 |
|
|
|||||
|
Unemployment Rate (%) |
3.2 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
|
Tourist Arrival (Million) |
9.68 |
11.64 |
13.17 |
14.49 |
15.46 |
|
Hotel Occupancy Rate (%) |
75.8 |
85.6 |
86.5 |
86.4 |
86.3 |
|
Cellular Phone Subscriber (Million) |
1.37 |
1.43 |
1.50 |
1.52 |
1.97 |
|
|
|||||
|
Registration of New Companies (No.) |
26,414 |
29,798 |
32,317 |
31,892 |
37,288 |
|
Registration of New Companies (%) |
4.3 |
12.8 |
8.5 |
(1.3) |
9.8 |
|
Liquidation of Companies (No.) |
22,393 |
15,126 |
19,005 |
17,218 |
17,369 |
|
Liquidation of Companies (%) |
113.4 |
(32.5) |
25.6 |
9.4 |
(5.3) |
|
|
|||||
|
Registration of New Businesses (No.) |
26,876 |
23,978 |
23,494 |
24,788 |
22,893 |
|
Registration of New Businesses (%) |
8.15 |
(10.78) |
2.02 |
5.51 |
1.70 |
|
Liquidation of Businesses (No.) |
23,552 |
24,211 |
23,005 |
22,489 |
22,598 |
|
Liquidation of Businesses (%) |
11.4 |
2.8 |
(5) |
(2.2) |
0.5 |
|
|
|||||
|
Bankruptcy Orders (No.) |
2,058 |
1,537 |
1,527 |
1,748 |
1,992 |
|
Bankruptcy Orders (%) |
(11.5) |
(25.3) |
(0.7) |
14.5 |
14.0 |
|
Bankruptcy Discharges (No.) |
3,056 |
2,252 |
1,391 |
1,881 |
2,584 |
|
Bankruptcy Discharges (%) |
103.7 |
(26.3) |
(38.2) |
35.2 |
37.4 |
|
|
|||||
|
INDUSTRIES ( % of Growth ) : |
|||||
|
Agriculture |
|||||
|
Production of Principal Crops |
3.25 |
(0.48) |
4.25 |
3.64 |
- |
|
Fish Supply & Wholesale |
(1.93) |
(10.5) |
12.10 |
(0.5) |
- |
|
|
|||||
|
Manufacturing * |
71.5 |
92.8 |
100.0 |
100.3 |
102.0 |
|
Food, Beverages & Tobacco |
90.4 |
96.4 |
100.0 |
103.5 |
103.5 |
|
Textiles |
145.9 |
122.1 |
100.0 |
104.0 |
87.1 |
|
Wearing Apparel |
211.0 |
123.3 |
100.0 |
92.1 |
77.8 |
|
Leather Products & Footwear |
79.5 |
81.8 |
100.0 |
98.6 |
109.8 |
|
Wood & Wood Products |
101.4 |
104.0 |
100.0 |
95.5 |
107.4 |
|
Paper & Paper Products |
95.4 |
106.1 |
100.0 |
97.4 |
103.2 |
|
Printing & Media |
100.9 |
103.5 |
100.0 |
93.0 |
86.1 |
|
Crude Oil Refineries |
96.4 |
95.6 |
100.0 |
99.4 |
93.5 |
|
Chemical & Chemical Products |
80.3 |
97.6 |
100.0 |
100.5 |
104.1 |
|
Pharmaceutical Products |
49.1 |
75.3 |
100.0 |
109.7 |
107.2 |
|
Rubber & Plastic Products |
101.2 |
112.3 |
100.0 |
96.5 |
92.9 |
|
Non-metallic Mineral |
91.9 |
92.5 |
100.0 |
98.2 |
97.6 |
|
Basic Metals |
92.6 |
102.2 |
100.0 |
90.6 |
76.5 |
|
Fabricated Metal Products |
90.8 |
103.6 |
100.0 |
104.3 |
105.1 |
|
Machinery & Equipment |
57.3 |
78.5 |
100.0 |
112.9 |
114.5 |
|
Electrical Machinery |
86.8 |
124.1 |
100.0 |
99.3 |
108.5 |
|
Electronic Components |
85.2 |
113.6 |
100.0 |
90.6 |
94.3 |
|
Transport Equipment |
96.0 |
94.0 |
100.0 |
106.3 |
107.5 |
|
|
|||||
|
Construction |
(36.9) |
14.20 |
20.50 |
28.70 |
- |
|
Real Estate |
1.4 |
21.3 |
25.4 |
31.9 |
- |
|
|
|||||
|
Services |
|||||
|
Electricity, Gas & Water |
1.70 |
4.00 |
7.00 |
6.30 |
- |
|
Transport, Storage & Communication |
3.90 |
12.80 |
7.40 |
5.30 |
- |
|
Finance & Insurance |
(16.4) |
(0.4) |
8.90 |
0.50 |
- |
|
Government Services |
4.50 |
9.70 |
6.90 |
6.00 |
- |
|
Education Services |
0.10 |
(0.9) |
(1.4) |
0.30 |
- |
|
|
|||||
|
* Based on Index of Industrial Production (2011 = 100) |
INDUSTRY
ANALYSIS
|
|
INDUSTRY : |
CONSTRUCTION |
|
For the whole of 2013, the sector expanded by 5.9%, slower than the
growth of 8.6% in the previous year. Total construction output increased by 5.4%
on the back of robust private and public residential building activities.
Besides, total construction demand increased by 17% to $36 billion in 2013,
setting a new record high. The increase was driven by robust construction
demand from the public sector. |
|
|
Public sector construction demand rose by 56% to $15 billion in 2013.
The increase was supported by a ramp-up of public-housing developments and
significant increase in civil engineering construction demand on account of the
award of various Thomson MRT Line contracts. Besides, despite a slight drop
of 1.1%, total private sector construction demand remained relatively strong
at $21 billion. Demand was fuelled by residential developments, where
contracts awarded increased by 15% to reach $9.8 billion in 2013, the highest
on record. Besides, civil engineering construction demand contracted by 45%
due to the high base in 2012. However, the value of civil engineering
contracts awarded in 2013 was still higher than that achieved between 2009
and 2011, supported largely by the construction of major utilities and berth
facilities. |
|
|
In 2013, construction output has increased by 5.4% to reach $33
billion, surpassing the previous peak of $32 billion in 2012. Growth was underpinned
by strong on-site construction activities for public and private residential,
private industrial and civil engineering developments. Total construction
output in 2014 is projected to rise to between $34 billion and $36 billion,
supported by record high levels of contracts awarded in 2013 and continued
robust on-site activities from the high levels of demand since 2011. |
|
|
Public sector construction output reached $12 billion in 2013,
comparable to that achieved in 2012, supported largely by an increase in
onsite construction activities for public housing (18%) and institutional and
other building (4.7%) projects. Some of the major institutional building
projects under construction included the Singapore University of Technology
and Design (SUTD) Campus Phase 1, Ng Teng Fong Hospital, National Heart
Centre, National Art Gallery and Victoria Concert Hall. Additionally, even
though civil engineering construction output has contracted by 9.6% in 2013,
progress payments remained robust at $4.8 billion, supported by new rail
construction such as the Downtown Line Stages 2 & 3 as well as other
infrastructure projects like Tuas West Extension and Marina Coastal
Expressway. |
|
|
Private sector construction output expanded by 8.3% to $21 billion in
2013, underpinned by growth across all development types. In particular,
robust growth in on-site construction activities for residential developments
(13%) and civil engineering (14%) projects supported overall output growth. |
|
|
BCA forecasts total construction demand in 2014 to be between $31
billion and $38 billion. Demand from the public sector is expected to
strengthen to between $19 billion and $22 billion, contributing close to 60%
of projected total construction demand. The boost to overall demand is likely
to come from stronger institutional and civil engineering construction works.
At the same time, private sector demand is projected to soften to between $12
billion and $16 billion, due to the anticipated reduction in residential
construction demand as property market sentiments remain subdued following
the various property cooling measures. |
|
|
Furthermore, BMI continues to expect construction and infrastructure
growth in Singapore to moderate over the 2014-2020 period. Real growth for
the construction sector is forecast to slow from 5.9% in 2014 to3.0% in 2019,
while real growth for the infrastructure sector is expected to fall from
12.7% in 2014 to 4.0%in 2019. This moderation is primarily due to declining
housing demand, longer construction periods for planned infrastructure
projects and a poor export outlook, which could curb investment in
non-residential buildings. |
|
|
In September 2014, Singapore's Land Transit Authority (LTA) announced
that Phase 2 of the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system's Downtown Line would
open ahead of schedule in Q116. The project had previously been delayed by
financial troubles at one of its key contractors, and was expected to come
online only by Q216. Phase 2 of the Downtown Line will include 12 stations,
nine of which will be completely new. The project's total cost is estimated
at approximately SGD800mn. |
|
|
OVERALL INDUSTRY OUTLOOK : AVERAGE GROWTH |
|
CREDIT
RISK EVALUATION & RECOMMENDATION
|
|
|
|
|
PROFIT
AND LOSS ACCOUNT
|
|
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WERE PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SINGAPORE
FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS. |
|
CHONG BROTHERS GENERAL CONTRACTOR PTE LTD |
|
Financial Year End |
2009-08-31 |
|
Months |
12 |
|
Consolidated Account |
Company |
|
Audited Account |
YES |
|
Unqualified Auditor's Report (Clean Opinion) |
YES |
|
Financial Type |
SUMMARY |
|
Currency |
SGD |
|
TURNOVER |
19,773,223 |
|
---------------- |
|
|
Total Turnover |
19,773,223 |
|
---------------- |
|
|
PROFIT/(LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS |
79,760 |
|
---------------- |
|
|
PROFIT/(LOSS) BEFORE TAXATION |
79,760 |
|
Taxation |
5,073 |
|
---------------- |
|
|
PROFIT/(LOSS) AFTER TAXATION |
84,833 |
|
---------------- |
|
|
PROFIT/(LOSS) BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS |
84,833 |
|
---------------- |
|
|
PROFIT/(LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS |
84,833 |
|
RETAINED PROFIT/(LOSS) BROUGHT FORWARD |
|
|
As previously reported |
(84,833) |
|
---------------- |
|
|
As restated |
(84,833) |
|
---------------- |
|
|
PROFIT AVAILABLE FOR APPROPRIATIONS |
0 |
|
---------------- |
|
|
RETAINED PROFIT/(LOSS) CARRIED FORWARD |
0 |
|
============= |
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
SHEET
|
|
CHONG BROTHERS GENERAL CONTRACTOR PTE LTD |
|
ASSETS EMPLOYED: |
|
|
FIXED ASSETS |
89,562 |
|
---------------- |
|
|
TOTAL LONG TERM ASSETS |
89,562 |
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
9,152,495 |
|
---------------- |
|
|
TOTAL ASSET |
9,242,057 |
|
============= |
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
9,952,060 |
|
---------------- |
|
|
NET CURRENT ASSETS/(LIABILITIES) |
(799,565) |
|
---------------- |
|
|
TOTAL NET ASSETS |
(710,003) |
|
============= |
|
|
SHARE CAPITAL |
|
|
Ordinary share capital |
1,500,000 |
|
---------------- |
|
|
TOTAL SHARE CAPITAL |
1,500,000 |
|
Retained profit/(loss) carried forward |
0 |
|
Others |
(2,210,003) |
|
---------------- |
|
|
TOTAL RESERVES |
(2,210,003) |
|
---------------- |
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS' FUNDS/EQUITY |
(710,003) |
|
TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES |
0 |
|
---------------- |
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.63.60 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.100.09 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.71.23 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Analysis Done by
: |
KAR |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
TPT |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit transaction.
It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest and
principal sums |
Large |
|
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General
unfavourable factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for
payment of interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with full
security |
|
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
|
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s
credit risk and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated
from a composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of
this report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated
through %) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend (10%) Operational size
(10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL) or
its officials.