|
Report No. : |
346618 |
|
Report Date : |
27.10.2015 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
GEM DIAM CO.,
LTD. |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
Room 708, 7th Floor, Sita Building, 388 Mahesak Road, Suriyawongse, Bangrak, Bangkok 10500 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Thailand |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2014 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
21.11.1996 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
0105539128612 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Importer and Distributor of Diamonds and Gemstones. |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
2 |
RATING & COMMENTS
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
B |
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Slow |
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES:
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail: infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List – March 31, 2015
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (31.12.2014) |
Current Rating (31.03.2015) |
|
Thailand |
A2 |
A2 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low |
A2 |
|
Moderate |
B1 |
|
High |
B2 |
|
Very High |
C1 |
|
Restricted |
C2 |
|
Off-credit |
D |
THAILAND - ECONOMIC
OVERVIEW
With a well-developed infrastructure, a free-enterprise
economy, and generally pro-investment policies Thailand has historically had a
strong economy due in part to competitive industrial and agriculture exports -
mostly electronics, agricultural commodities, automobiles and parts, and
processed foods. The economy experienced slow growth and declining exports in
2014, in part due to domestic political turmoil and sluggish global demand.
With full employment, Thailand attracts an estimated 2-4 million migrant
workers from neighboring countries, and faces labor shortages. Following the
May 2014 coup d'etat, tourism decreased 6-7% but is beginning to recover. The
household debt to GDP ratio is over 80%. The Thai government in 2013
implemented a nation-wide 300 baht ($10) per day minimum wage policy and
deployed new tax reforms designed to lower rates on middle-income earners. The
Thai baht has remained stable.
|
Source
: CIA |
GEM DIAM CO., LTD.
BUSINESS
ADDRESS : ROOM
708, 7th FLOOR,
SITA BUILDING,
388 MAHESAK
ROAD, SURIYAWONGSE,
BANGRAK, BANGKOK
10500, THAILAND
TELEPHONE : [66] 2635-3761-2,
089 125-0077
FAX :
[66] 2635-6675
E-MAIL
ADDRESS : -
REGISTRATION
ADDRESS : SAME
AS BUSINESS ADDRESS
ESTABLISHED
: 1996
REGISTRATION
NO. : 0105539128612
TAX
ID NO. : 3011824672
CAPITAL REGISTERED : BHT. 4,000,000
CAPITAL PAID-UP : BHT.
4,000,000
SHAREHOLDER’S PROPORTION : THAI :
51.00%
INDIAN : 49.00%
FISCAL YEAR CLOSING DATE : DECEMBER 31
LEGAL
STATUS : PRIVATE LIMITED
COMPANY
EXECUTIVE : MR. MADHU SUDAN
MUNDRA, INDIAN
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.
OF STAFF : 2
LINES
OF BUSINESS : DIAMONDS AND GEMSTONES
IMPORTER AND DISTRIBUTOR
OPERATING
TREND : STABLE
PRESENT
SITUATION : OPERATING NORMALLY
REPUTATION : GOOD
WITH NORMAL BUSINESS
ENGAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
STANDARD : MANAGEMENT WITH
FAIR PERFORMANCE
The
subject was established
on November 21,
1996 as a
private limited company
under the registered
name GEM DIAM
CO., LTD., by Thai
and Indian groups,
with the business
objective to import
and distribute diamonds
and gemstones for
domestic market. It
currently employs 2
staff.
The
subject’s registered address
is Room 708, 7th Floor,
Sita Building, 388
Mahesak Road, Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok 10500,
and this is
the subject’s current
operation address.
|
Name |
|
Nationality |
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Madhu Sudan Mundra |
|
Indian |
47 |
|
Mr. Manoj Kumar Shama |
|
Indian |
44 |
One of the
above directors can
sign on behalf
of the subject
with company’s affixed.
Mr. Madhu Sudan Mundra
is the Managing
Director.
He is Indian
nationality with the
age of 47 years old.
The subject
is engaged in
importing and distributing
various kinds of
diamonds and gemstones
for jewelry production
industry.
PURCHASE
90% of the
products is imported
from India, Pakistan
and Republic of
China, the remaining
10% is purchased
from local suppliers.
SALES
100% of the
products is sold
locally by wholesale
to manufacturers and
end-users.
The subject is
not found to
have any subsidiary
or affiliated company
here in Thailand.
Bankruptcy and Receivership
There are no
litigation on bankruptcy
and receivership cases
filed against the
subject found at
Legal Execution Department
for the past
five years.
Others
There are no
legal suits filed
against the subject
according the past
two years.
Sales are by
cash or on
the credits term
of 30-60 days.
Local bills are
paid by cash
or on the
credits term of
30-60 days.
Imports are by
T/T.
Bangkok
Bank Public Co.,
Ltd.
The
subject currently employs
2 staff.
The
premise is rented
for administrative office
at the heading
address. Premise is
located in a
prime commercial area.
Note
Refer
to your given
address “388 Sita
Building, 7th Floor,
708, Silom Road,
Bangkok”, please be
informed that, the
correct address is “Room 708, 7th Floor,
Sita Building, 388
Mahesak Road, Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok 10500”.
The
subject has slow
business growth in
the past several
years. Amid economy
sluggish and shrinking
purchasing power, its
business is growing
at slow pace.
The
capital was registered
at Bht. 2,000,000
divided into 20,000
shares of Bht.
100 each with
fully paid.
The
capital was increased
later as follows:
Bht. 3,000,000
on November 17,
1999
Bht. 4,000,000
on February 28,
2000
The
latest registered capital
was increased to
Bht. 4,000,000 divided
into 40,000 shares
of Bht. 100 each
with fully paid.
[as
at April 30,
2015]
|
NAME |
HOLDING |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Madhu Sudan Mundra Nationality: Indian Address : 388
Mahesak Road, Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok |
13,200 |
33.00 |
|
Mr. Danai Meemala Nationality: Thai Address : 87 Krungkasem Road,
Klongmahanak,
Pomprabsattrupai, Bangkok |
5,100 |
12.75 |
|
Mr. Mana Leechalad Nationality: Thai Address : 14/1
Krungkasem Road, Klongmahanak,
Pomprabsattrupai, Bangkok |
5,100 |
12.75 |
|
Mr. Charoon Chantawong Nationality: Thai Address : 18/4
Krungkasem Road, Klongmahanak,
Pomprabsattrupai, Bangkok |
5,100 |
12.75 |
|
Mr. Teerayut Amperdpao Nationality: Thai Address : 96/1
Krungkasem Road, Klongmahanak,
Pomprabsattrupai, Bangkok |
5,100 |
12.75 |
|
Mr. Amit Kumar Maheshwari Nationality: Indian Address : 388
Mahesak Road, Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok |
3,200 |
8.00 |
|
Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma Nationality: Indian Address : 388
Mahesak Road, Suriyawongse,
Bangrak, Bangkok |
3,200 |
8.00 |
Total Shareholders : 7
Share Structure [as
at April 30,
2015]
|
Nationality |
Shareholders |
No. of Share |
% Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thai |
4 |
20,400 |
51.00 |
|
Foreign - Indian |
3 |
19,600 |
49.00 |
|
Total |
7 |
40,000 |
100.00 |
Ms. Sirirat Adam No.
8820
The
latest financial figures
published for December
31, 2014, 2013
& 2012 were:
ASSETS
|
Current Assets |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
80,955.50 |
114,571.96 |
315,160.31 |
|
Trade Accounts &
Other Receivable |
196,268.51 |
8,170,476.08 |
2,161,125.53 |
|
Inventories |
76,818,426.58 |
94,565,760.50 |
41,492,306.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
77,095,650.59 |
102,850,808.54 |
43,968,591.86 |
|
Office Equipment |
52,937.33 |
56,566.63 |
67,200.46 |
|
Total Assets |
77,148,587.92 |
102,907,375.17 |
44,035,792.32 |
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
[BAHT]
|
Current Liabilities |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Accounts
& Other Payable |
73,070,721.57 |
99,916,159.19 |
42,407,055.44 |
|
Short-term Loan |
2,300,000.00 |
1,400,000.00 |
- |
|
Accrued Income
Tax |
2,907.43 |
- |
46,735.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current
Liabilities |
75,373,629.00 |
101,316,159.19 |
42,453,791.40 |
|
Total Liabilities |
75,373,629.00 |
101,316,159.19 |
42,453,791.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital : Baht 100 par
value Authorized &
issued share capital
40,000 shares
|
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Paid |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
4,000,000.00 |
|
Retained Earning - Unappropriated
[Deficit] |
[2,225,041.08] |
[2,408,784.02] |
[2,417,999.08] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders' Equity |
1,774,958.92 |
1,591,215.98 |
1,582,000.92 |
|
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity |
77,148,587.92 |
102,907,375.17 |
44,035,792.32 |
|
Revenue |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
13,924,018.24 |
7,299,359.04 |
16,924,612.24 |
|
Other Income |
34,420.97 |
1,030,747.19 |
1,266,167.99 |
|
Total Revenues |
13,958,439.21 |
8,330,106.23 |
18,190,780.23 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods
Sold |
12,655,981.65 |
6,776,451.98 |
15,212,038.44 |
|
Selling Expenses |
53,319.17 |
152,114.68 |
303,226.83 |
|
Administrative Expenses |
1,150,912.12 |
1,391,154.31 |
1,511,618.85 |
|
Total Expenses |
13,860,212.94 |
8,319,720.97 |
17,026,884.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit / [Loss] before Financial Cost &
Income Tax |
98,226.27 |
10,385.26 |
1,163,896.11 |
|
Financial Cost |
[200.00] |
[1,170.20] |
[11,343.13] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit / [Loss] before Income
Tax |
98,026.27 |
9,215.06 |
1,152,552.98 |
|
Income Tax |
[2,907.43] |
- |
[46,735.96] |
|
Net Profit / [Loss] |
95,118.84 |
9,215.06 |
1,105,817.02 |
|
ITEM |
UNIT |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT RATIO |
TIMES |
1.02 |
1.02 |
1.04 |
|
QUICK RATIO |
TIMES |
0.00 |
0.08 |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVITY RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
263.03 |
129.04 |
251.85 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS TURNOVER |
TIMES |
0.18 |
0.07 |
0.38 |
|
INVENTORY CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
2,215.45 |
5,093.60 |
995.57 |
|
INVENTORY TURNOVER |
TIMES |
0.16 |
0.07 |
0.37 |
|
RECEIVABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
5.14 |
408.56 |
46.61 |
|
RECEIVABLES TURNOVER |
TIMES |
70.94 |
0.89 |
7.83 |
|
PAYABLES CONVERSION PERIOD |
DAYS |
2,107.37 |
5,381.78 |
1,017.52 |
|
CASH CONVERSION CYCLE |
DAYS |
113.23 |
120.37 |
24.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFITABILITY
RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
% |
90.89 |
92.84 |
89.88 |
|
SELLING & ADMINISTRATION |
% |
8.65 |
21.14 |
10.72 |
|
INTEREST |
% |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.07 |
|
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
9.35 |
21.28 |
17.60 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN BEFORE EX. ITEM |
% |
0.71 |
0.14 |
6.88 |
|
NET PROFIT MARGIN |
% |
0.68 |
0.13 |
6.53 |
|
RETURN ON EQUITY |
% |
5.36 |
0.58 |
69.90 |
|
RETURN ON ASSET |
% |
0.12 |
0.01 |
2.51 |
|
EARNING PER SHARE |
BAHT |
2.38 |
0.23 |
27.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVERAGE RATIO |
|
|
|
|
|
DEBT RATIO |
TIMES |
0.98 |
0.98 |
0.96 |
|
DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO |
TIMES |
42.46 |
63.67 |
26.84 |
|
TIME INTEREST EARNED |
TIMES |
491.13 |
8.87 |
102.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL GROWTH |
|
|
|
|
|
SALES GROWTH |
% |
90.76 |
(56.87) |
|
|
OPERATING PROFIT |
% |
845.82 |
(99.11) |
|
|
NET PROFIT |
% |
932.21 |
(99.17) |
|
|
FIXED ASSETS |
% |
(6.42) |
(15.82) |
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
% |
(25.03) |
133.69 |
|
ANNUAL GROWTH :
SATISFACTORY
An annual sales growth is 90.76%.
Turnover has increased from THB
PROFITABILITY :
RISKY

PROFITABILITY
RATIO
|
Gross Profit Margin |
9.35 |
Acceptable |
Industrial Average |
16.41 |
|
Net Profit Margin |
0.68 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial Average |
1.41 |
|
Return on Assets |
0.12 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial Average |
3.02 |
|
Return on Equity |
5.36 |
Acceptable |
Industrial Average |
8.20 |
Gross Profit Margin used to assess a firm's financial health by
revealing the proportion of money left over from revenues after accounting for
the cost of goods sold. Gross profit margin serves as the source for paying
additional expenses and future savings. The company's figure is 9.35%. When
compared with the industry average, the ratio of the company was lower. This
indicated that company may have problems with control over its costs.
Net Profit Margin is the indicator of the company's efficiency in that
net profit takes into consideration all expenses of the company. A low profit
margin indicates a low margin of safety, higher risk that a decline in sales
will erase profits and result in a net loss. The company's figure is 0.68%.
When compared with the industry average, the ratio of the company was lower.
Return on Assets measures how efficiently profits are being generated
from the assets employed in the business when compared with the ratios of firms
in a similar business. A low ratio in comparison with industry averages
indicates an inefficient use of business assets. When compared with the
industry average, it was lower, the company's figure is 0.12%.
Return on Equity indicates how profitable a company is by comparing its
net income to its average shareholders' equity, ROE measures how much the
shareholders earned for their investment in the company. When compared with the
industry average, it was lower, the company's figure is 5.36%.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Return on Assets Uptrend
Return on Equity Uptrend
LIQUIDITY : RISKY

LIQUIDITY RATIO
|
Current Ratio |
1.02 |
Acceptable |
Industrial Average |
1.66 |
|
Quick Ratio |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Conversion Cycle |
113.23 |
|
|
|
The Current Ratio is to ascertain whether a company's short-term assets
are readily available to pay off its short-term liabilities. The company's
figure is 1.02 times in 2014, same
figure as in 2013, then it is generally considered to have
good short-term financial strength. When compared with the industry average,
the ratio of the company was lower.
The Quick Ratio is a liquidity indicator that further refines the
current ratio by measuring the amount of the most liquid current assets there
are to cover current liabilities. The company's figure is 0 times in 2014,
decrease from 0.08 times, then the company has not enough current assets that
presumably can be quickly converted to cash for pay financial obligations.
The Cash Conversion Cycle measures the number of days a company's cash
is tied up in the production and sales process of its operations and the
benefit from payment terms from its creditors. It meant the company could survive
when no cash inflow was received from sale for 114 days.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Current Ratio Uptrend
LEVERAGE :
ACCEPTABLE


LEVERAGE RATIO
|
Debt Ratio |
0.98 |
Acceptable |
Industrial Average |
0.60 |
|
Debt to Equity Ratio |
42.46 |
Risky |
Industrial Average |
1.49 |
|
Times Interest Earned |
491.13 |
Impressive |
Industrial Average |
- |
Debt to Equity Ratio a measurement of how much suppliers, lenders,
creditors and obligors have committed to the company versus what the
shareholders have committed. A higher the percentage means that the company is
using less equity and has stronger leverage position.
Times Interest Earned measuring a company's ability to meet its debt
obligations. Ratio is 491.14 higher than 1, so the company can pay interest
expenses on outstanding debt.
Debt Ratio shows the proportion of a company's assets which are financed
through debt. The company's figure is 0.98 greater than 0.5, most of the
company's assets are financed through debt.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Debt Ratio Downtrend
Times Interest Earned Stable
ACTIVITY :
SATISFACTORY

ACTIVITY RATIO
|
Fixed Assets Turnover |
263.03 |
Impressive |
Industrial Average |
- |
|
Total Assets Turnover |
0.18 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial Average |
2.14 |
|
Inventory Conversion Period |
2,215.45 |
|
|
|
|
Inventory Turnover |
0.16 |
Deteriorated |
Industrial Average |
3.44 |
|
Receivables Conversion Period |
5.14 |
|
|
|
|
Receivables Turnover |
70.94 |
Impressive |
Industrial Average |
4.11 |
|
Payables Conversion Period |
2,107.37 |
|
|
|
The company's Account Receivable Ratio is calculated as 70.94 and
Inventory Turnover in Days Ratio indicates the liquidity of inventory.
It estimates the number of days that it will take to sell the current
inventory. Inventory is particularly sensitive to change in business
activities. The inventory turnover in days has decreased from 5094 days at the
end of 2013 to 2215 days at the end of 2014. This represents a positive trend.
And Inventory turnover has increased from 0.07 times in year 2013 to 0.16 times
in year 2014.
The company's Total Asset Turnover is calculated as 0.18 times and 0.07
times in 2014 and 2013 respectively. This ratio is determined by dividing total
assets into total sales turnover. The ratio measures the activity of the assets
and the ability of the firm to generate sales through the use of the assets.
Trend of the
average competitors in the same industry for last 5 years
Fixed Assets Turnover Stable
Total Assets Turnover Downtrend
Inventory Turnover Downtrend
Receivables Turnover Downtrend
DIAMOND INDUSTRY – INDIA
-
From time immemorial, India is well known in the world
as the birthplace for diamonds. It is difficult to trace the origin of
diamonds but history says that in the remote past, diamonds were mined only in
India. Diamond production in India can be traced back to almost 8th
Century B.C. India, in fact, remained undisputed leader till 18th
Century when Brazilian fields were discovered in 1725 followed by emergence of
S. Africa, Russia and Australia.
-
The achievement of the Indian diamond industry was
possible only due to combination of the manufacturing skills of the Indian
workforce and the untiring and unflagging efforts of the Indian diamantaires,
supported by progressive Government policies.
-
The area of study of family owned diamond businesses
derives its importance from the huge conglomerate of family run organizations
which operate in the diamond industry since many generations.
-
Some of the basic traits of family run business
enterprises include spirit of entrepreneurship, mutual trust lowers transaction
costs, small, nimble and quick to react, information as a source of advantage
and philanthropy.
-
Family owned diamond businesses need to improve on
many fronts including higher standard of corporate governance, long-term
performance – focused strategies, modern management and technology.
-
Utmost caution is to be exercised while dealing with
some medium and large diamond traders which are usually engaged in fictitious
import – export, inter-company transactions, financially assisted by banks. In
the process, several public sector banks lost several hundred million rupees.
They mostly diverted borrowed money for diamond business into real estate and
capital markets.
-
Excerpts from Times of India dated 30th
October 2010 is as under –
-
Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council in its
statistical data has shown the export of polished diamonds to have increase by
28 % in February 2013. Compared to $ 1.4 bn worth of polished diamond export in
February, 2012, India exported $ 1.84 billion worth of polished diamonds in
February 2013. A senior executive of GJEPC said, “Export of cut and polished
diamonds started falling month-wise after the imposition of 2 % of import duty
on the polished diamonds. But February, 2013 has given a new ray of hope to the
industry as the export of polished diamonds has actually increased by 28 %. It
means the industry is on the track of recovery and round tripping of
diamonds has stopped completely.” Demand has started coming from the US, the
UK, Japan and China. India’s polished diamond export is expected to cross $ 21
bn in 2013-14.
-
The banking sector has started exercising restraint
while following prudent risk management norms when lending money to gems and
jewellery sector. This follows the implementation of Basel III accord – a
global voluntary regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy, stress testing
and market liquidity.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
Rs.64.96 |
|
|
1 |
Rs.99.55 |
|
Euro |
1 |
Rs.71.62 |
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Analysis Done by
: |
DIV |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
NIT |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
RATING |
STATUS |
PROPOSED CREDIT LINE |
|
|
|
>86 |
Aaa |
Possesses an extremely sound financial base with the strongest
capability for timely payment of interest and principal sums |
Unlimited |
|
|
71-85 |
Aa |
Possesses adequate working capital. No caution needed for credit
transaction. It has above average (strong) capability for payment of interest
and principal sums |
Large |
|
|
56-70 |
A |
Financial & operational base are regarded healthy. General unfavourable
factors will not cause fatal effect. Satisfactory capability for payment of
interest and principal sums |
Fairly Large |
|
|
41-55 |
Ba |
Overall operation is considered normal. Capable to meet normal
commitments. |
Satisfactory |
|
|
26-40 |
B |
Capability to overcome financial difficulties seems comparatively
below average. |
Small |
|
|
11-25 |
Ca |
Adverse factors are apparent. Repayment of interest and principal sums
in default or expected to be in default upon maturity |
Limited with
full security |
|
|
<10 |
C |
Absolute credit risk exists. Caution needed to be exercised |
Credit not
recommended |
|
|
-- |
NB |
New Business |
-- |
|
This score serves as a reference to assess SC’s
credit risk and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated
from a composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of
this report. The assessed factors and their relative weights (as indicated
through %) are as follows:
Financial
condition (40%) Ownership
background (20%) Payment
record (10%)
Credit history
(10%) Market trend (10%) Operational size
(10%)
This report is issued at your request without any
risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL) or
its officials.