|
|
|
MIRA INFORM REPORT
|
Report No. : |
494327 |
|
Report Date : |
24.02.2018 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
DU PONT KABUSHIKI KAISHA |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
Sanno Park Tower 11F, 2-11-1 Nagatacho Chiyodaku Tokyo 100-6111 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Japan |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.12.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
Jun 1993 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
0100-01-087831 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Limited Company |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Manufactures, imports, exports and
wholesales Du Pont products, limited to a performance materials |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
751 |
RATING & COMMENTS
(Mira Inform has adopted New Rating mechanism w.e.f. 23rd
January 2017)
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
A |
|
Credit Rating |
Explanation |
Rating Comments |
|
A |
Acceptable Risk |
Business dealings permissible with
moderate risk of default |
|
Status : |
Good |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Regular |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made on
e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (30.09.2017) |
Current Rating (31.12.2017) |
|
Japan |
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low Risk |
A2 |
|
Moderately Low Risk |
B1 |
|
Moderate Risk |
B2 |
|
Moderately High Risk |
C1 |
|
High Risk |
C2 |
|
Very High Risk |
D |
JAPAN - ECONOMIC
OVERVIEW
Over the past 70 years, government-industry cooperation, a strong work ethic, mastery of high technology, and a comparatively small defense allocation (slightly less than 1% of GDP) have helped Japan develop an advanced economy. Two notable characteristics of the post-World War II economy were the close interlocking structures of manufacturers, suppliers, and distributors, known as keiretsu, and the guarantee of lifetime employment for a substantial portion of the urban labor force. Both features have significantly eroded under the dual pressures of global competition and domestic demographic change.
Measured on a purchasing power parity basis that adjusts for price differences, Japan in 2017 stood as the fourth-largest economy in the world after first-place China, which surpassed Japan in 2001, and third-place India, which edged out Japan in 2012. For three postwar decades, overall real economic growth was impressive - a 10% average in the 1960s, 5% in the 1970s, and 4% in the 1980s. Growth slowed markedly in the 1990s, averaging just 1.7%, largely because of the aftereffects of inefficient investment and the collapse of an asset price bubble in the late 1980s, which entailed considerable time for firms to reduce excess debt, capital, and labor. Modest economic growth continued after 2000, but the economy has fallen into recession four times since 2008.
Japan enjoyed an uptick in growth in 2013 on the basis of Prime Minister Shinzo ABE’s “Three Arrows” economic revitalization agenda - dubbed “Abenomics” - of monetary easing, “flexible” fiscal policy, and structural reform. Led by the Bank of Japan’s aggressive monetary easing, Japan is making modest progress in ending deflation, but demographic decline – a low birthrate and an aging, shrinking population – poses a major long-term challenge for the economy. The government currently faces the quandary of balancing its efforts to stimulate growth and institute economic reforms with the necessity of addressing its sizable public debt, which stands at 235% of GDP. To help raise government revenue, Japan adopted legislation in 2012 to gradually raise the consumption tax rate. However, the first such increase, in April 2014, led to another recession, so Prime Minister ABE has twice postponed the next increase, now scheduled for October 2019. Structural reforms to unlock productivity are seen as central to strengthening the economy in the long-run.
Scarce in critical natural resources, Japan has long been dependent on imported energy and raw materials. After the complete shutdown of Japan’s nuclear reactors following the earthquake and tsunami disaster in 2011, Japan's industrial sector has become even more dependent than before on imported fossil fuels. However, ABE’s government is seeking to restart nuclear power plants that meet strict new safety standards and is emphasizing nuclear energy’s importance as a base-load electricity source. In August 2015, Japan successfully restarted one nuclear reactor at the Sendai Nuclear Power Plant in Kagoshima prefecture, and several other reactors around the country have since resumed operations; however, opposition from local governments has delayed several more restarts that remain pending. Reforms of the electricity and gas sectors, including full liberalization of Japan’s energy market in April 2016 and gas market in April 2017, constitute an important part of Prime Minister Abe’s economic program.
In October 2015, Japan and 11 trading partners reached agreement on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a pact that had promised to open Japan's economy to increased foreign competition and create new export opportunities for Japanese businesses. Japan was the first country to ratify the TPP in December 2016; the United States signaled its withdrawal from the TPP in January 2017, and in November 2017 the remaining 11 countries agreed on the core elements of a modified agreement, which they renamed the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
|
Source
: CIA |
Company
summery
DU PONT KABUSHIKI KAISHA
REGD NAME: Du
Pont KK
MAIN OFFICE: Sanno
Park Tower 11F, 2-11-1 Nagatacho Chiyodaku Tokyo 100-6111 JAPAN
Tel:
03-5521-8500 Fax:
03-5434-6190
URL: http//:www2.dupont.com
E-mail: (thru the URL)
ACTIVITIES: Mfg, import, export of Du Pont products
BRANCHES: Osaka, Nagoya, Sendai, Fukuoka
FACTORIES: Utsunomiya
OFFICER(S): YOSHIYUKI TANAKA, PRES
Katsunori Hashimoto, v pres
Sachiko Hashimoto, dir
Yen
Amount: In million Yen, unless
otherwise stated
SUMMARY: FINANCES FAIR A/SALES Yen 83,392 M
PAYMENTS REGULAR CAPITAL Yen 450 M
TREND SLOW WORTH Yen
4,954 M
STARTED 1993 EMPLOYES 751
COMMENT
MFR OF
DU PONT PRODUCTS.
FINANCIAL SITUATION CONSIDERED
FAIR AND GOOD FOR ORDINARY BUSINESS ENGAGEMENTS
HIGHLIGHTS
The subject company was established originally in 1961 as Du
Pont Japan Office and in 1993 merged three sister firms and renamed as
captioned. This is a trading firm, with
mfg division, for import, export and wholesale of Du Pont products. Clients include major automakers, textile
mfrs, home electric appliance makers, other, nationwide.
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
The sales volume for Dec/2016 fiscal term amounted to Yen 83,392
million, a 22% down from Yen 107,233 million in the previous term. This is referred to the separation of the
firm to concentrate on performance materials.
The recurring profit was posted at Yen 12,391 million and the net profit
at Yen 8,583 million, respectively, compared with Yen 14,031 million recurring
profit and Yen 3,050 million net profit, respectively, a year ago. .
For the current term ending Dec 2017 the recurring profit is
projected at Yen 13,000 million and the net profit at Yen 9,000 million,
respectively, on a 3% rise in turnover, to Yen 85,900 million.
The financial situation is considered FAIR and good for
ORDINARY business engagements.
REGISTRATION
Date Registered: Jun
1993
Regd No.: 0100-01-087831
(Tokyo-Chiyodaku)
Legal Status: Limited
Company (Kabushiki Kaisha)
Authorized: 1,456.000
shares
Issued: 5,979
shares
Sum: Yen
450 million
Major shareholders (%): Du
Pont Asia Pacific Ltd (100)
Nothing
detrimental is known as to the commercial morality of executives.
OPERATION
Activities: Manufactures, imports, exports and
wholesales Du Pont products, limited to a performance materials (--100%).
Clients: [Mfr, wholesalers] Panasonic Corp,
Sony Corp, Sharp Ltd, Mitsui & Co, Marubeni Corp, other
No. of accounts: 500
Domestic areas of activities:
Nationwide
Suppliers: [Mfrs] Du Pont, USA & group
firms, Mitsui Du Pont Poly-chemical, Toray Du Pont, MRC Du Pont, other
Payment record:
Regular
Location:
Business area in Tokyo. Office premises
at the caption address are leased and maintained satisfactorily.
Bank References:
Mizuho Bank (H/O)
City Bank (H/O)
Relations: Satisfactory
FINANCES
(In Million Yen)
|
Terms Ending: |
31/12/2017 |
31/12/2016 |
31/12/2015 |
31/12/2014 |
|
|
Annual
Sales |
|
85,900 |
83,392 |
107,233 |
122,786 |
|
Recur.
Profit |
|
13,000 |
12,391 |
14,031 |
19,213 |
|
Net
Profit |
|
9,000 |
8,583 |
3,050 |
8,726 |
|
Total
Assets |
|
|
38,581 |
62,096 |
122,666 |
|
Current
Assets |
|
|
27,326 |
39,419 |
57,430 |
|
Current
Liabs |
|
|
11,367 |
29,302 |
70,635 |
|
Net
Worth |
|
|
4,954 |
1,534 |
46,144 |
|
Capital,
Paid-Up |
|
|
460 |
460 |
21,000 |
|
Div.P.Share(¥) |
|
|
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
<Analytical Data> |
|
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
|
S.Growth Rate |
|
3.01 |
-22.23 |
-12.67 |
11.48 |
|
Current Ratio |
|
.. |
240.40 |
134.53 |
81.31 |
|
N.Worth Ratio |
|
.. |
12.84 |
2.47 |
37.62 |
|
R.Profit/Sales |
|
15.13 |
14.86 |
13.08 |
15.65 |
|
N.Profit/Sales |
|
10.48 |
10.29 |
2.84 |
7.11 |
|
Return On Equity |
|
.. |
173.25 |
198.83 |
18.91 |
Notes:
Forecast (or estimated) figures for the 31/12/2017 fiscal term.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
INR 65.82 |
|
|
1 |
INR 90.40 |
|
Euro |
1 |
INR 79.76 |
|
YEN |
1 |
INR 0.61 |
Note :
Above are approximate rates obtained from sources believed to be correct
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Analysis Done by
: |
VIV |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
KET |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
Credit Rating |
Explanation |
Rating Comments |
|
A++ |
Minimum Risk |
Business dealings permissible with minimum
risk of default |
|
A+ |
Low Risk |
Business dealings permissible with low
risk of default |
|
A |
Acceptable Risk |
Business dealings permissible with
moderate risk of default |
|
B |
Medium Risk |
Business dealings permissible on a regular
monitoring basis |
|
C |
Medium High Risk |
Business dealings permissible preferably
on secured basis |
|
D |
High Risk |
Business dealing not recommended or on
secured terms only |
|
NB |
New Business |
No recommendation can be done due to
business in infancy stage |
|
NT |
No Trace |
No recommendation can be done as the
business is not traceable |
NB is stated where there is insufficient information to facilitate rating. However, it is not to be considered as unfavourable.
This score serves as a r eference to assess SC’s credit risk and to set
the amount of credit to be extended. It is calculated from a composite of
weighted scores obtained from each of the major sections of this report. The
assessed factors are as follows:
·
Financial
condition covering various ratios
·
Company
background and operations size
·
Promoters
/ Management background
·
Payment
record
·
Litigation
against the subject
·
Industry
scenario / competitor analysis
·
Supplier
/ Customer / Banker review (wherever available)
This report is issued at
your request without any risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM
PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL) or its officials.