|
|
|
MIRA
INFORM REPORT
|
Report No. : |
495126 |
|
Report Date : |
28.02.2018 |
|
|
|
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
DMW CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
Omori Eki Higashiguchi Bldg, 1-5-1 Omori-Kita Otaku Tokyo 143-0016 |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Japan |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
31.03.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
March 1955 |
|
|
|
|
Com. Reg. No.: |
0108-01-007581 (Tokyo-Otaku) |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Limited Company (Kabushiki Kaisha) |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Manufacturing of Pumps, Valves, Blowers |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
455 |
RATING & COMMENTS
(Mira Inform has adopted New Rating mechanism w.e.f. 23rd
January 2017)
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
A+ |
|
Credit Rating |
Explanation |
Rating Comments |
|
A+ |
Low Risk |
Business dealings permissible with low
risk of default |
|
Status : |
Good |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Regular |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (30.09.2017) |
Current Rating (31.12.2017) |
|
Japan |
A1 |
A1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low Risk |
A2 |
|
Moderately Low Risk |
B1 |
|
Moderate Risk |
B2 |
|
Moderately High Risk |
C1 |
|
High Risk |
C2 |
|
Very High Risk |
D |
JAPAN - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
Over the past 70 years, government-industry cooperation, a strong work
ethic, mastery of high technology, and a comparatively small defense allocation
(slightly less than 1% of GDP) have helped Japan develop an advanced economy.
Two notable characteristics of the post-World War II economy were the close
interlocking structures of manufacturers, suppliers, and distributors, known as
keiretsu, and the guarantee of lifetime employment for a substantial portion of
the urban labor force. Both features have significantly eroded under the dual
pressures of global competition and domestic demographic change.
Measured on a purchasing power parity basis that adjusts for price
differences, Japan in 2017 stood as the fourth-largest economy in the world
after first-place China, which surpassed Japan in 2001, and third-place India,
which edged out Japan in 2012. For three postwar decades, overall real economic
growth was impressive - a 10% average in the 1960s, 5% in the 1970s, and 4% in
the 1980s. Growth slowed markedly in the 1990s, averaging just 1.7%, largely
because of the aftereffects of inefficient investment and the collapse of an
asset price bubble in the late 1980s, which entailed considerable time for
firms to reduce excess debt, capital, and labor. Modest economic growth
continued after 2000, but the economy has fallen into recession four times
since 2008.
Japan enjoyed an uptick in growth in 2013 on the basis of Prime Minister
Shinzo ABE’s “Three Arrows” economic revitalization agenda - dubbed “Abenomics”
- of monetary easing, “flexible” fiscal policy, and structural reform. Led by
the Bank of Japan’s aggressive monetary easing, Japan is making modest progress
in ending deflation, but demographic decline – a low birthrate and an aging, shrinking
population – poses a major long-term challenge for the economy. The government
currently faces the quandary of balancing its efforts to stimulate growth and
institute economic reforms with the necessity of addressing its sizable public
debt, which stands at 235% of GDP. To help raise government revenue, Japan
adopted legislation in 2012 to gradually raise the consumption tax rate.
However, the first such increase, in April 2014, led to another recession, so
Prime Minister ABE has twice postponed the next increase, now scheduled for
October 2019. Structural reforms to unlock productivity are seen as central to
strengthening the economy in the long-run.
Scarce in critical natural resources, Japan has long been dependent on
imported energy and raw materials. After the complete shutdown of Japan’s
nuclear reactors following the earthquake and tsunami disaster in 2011, Japan's
industrial sector has become even more dependent than before on imported fossil
fuels. However, ABE’s government is seeking to restart nuclear power plants
that meet strict new safety standards and is emphasizing nuclear energy’s
importance as a base-load electricity source. In August 2015, Japan
successfully restarted one nuclear reactor at the Sendai Nuclear Power Plant in
Kagoshima prefecture, and several other reactors around the country have since
resumed operations; however, opposition from local governments has delayed
several more restarts that remain pending. Reforms of the electricity and gas
sectors, including full liberalization of Japan’s energy market in April 2016
and gas market in April 2017, constitute an important part of Prime Minister
Abe’s economic program.
In October 2015, Japan and 11 trading partners reached agreement on the
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a pact that had promised to open Japan's
economy to increased foreign competition and create new export opportunities
for Japanese businesses. Japan was the first country to ratify the TPP in
December 2016; the United States signaled its withdrawal from the TPP in
January 2017, and in November 2017 the remaining 11 countries agreed on the
core elements of a modified agreement, which they renamed the Comprehensive and
Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
|
Source
: CIA |
Company name & address
DMW CORPORATION
REGD NAME: KK
Dengyosha Kikai Seisakusho
MAIN OFFICE: Omori
Eki Higashiguchi Bldg, 1-5-1 Omori-Kita Otaku Tokyo 143-0016 JAPAN
Tel: 03-3298-5115 Fax: 03-3298-5149
URL: http://www.dmw.co.jp
E-Mail address: (thru the URL)
ACTIVITIES: Mfg
of pumps, valves, blowers
BRANCHES: Osaka,
Nagoya, Mishima, Sendai, Hiroshima, Fukuoka, other (Tot 20)
OVERSEAS: USA,
India, Singapore, China, UAE (--subsidiaries)
FACTORIES: Mishima
(Miyoshicho)
CHIEF EXEC: TADAHIRO
TSUCHIYA, PRES
Yen Amount: In million Yen,
unless otherwise stated
SUMMARY
FINANCES FAIR A/SALES Yen
18,275 M
PAYMENTS REGULAR CAPITAL Yen
810 M
TREND STEADY WORTH Yen
17,093 M
STARTED 1955 EMPLOYES 455
COMMENT: MFG OF PUMPS FINANCIAL SITUATION COSIDERED FAIR AND GOOD FOR ORDINARY BUSINESS ENGAGEMENTS.
HIGHLIGHTS
This is one of 5 largest pump manufacturers. Strong in public sector including local governments. Also makes blowers for steel, chemicals and
cement makers. Other products include
valves, water-treatment systems, underwater dredging robots, remote control
systems, other. The company aims to
boost sales circulating water pumps to one billion Yen in five years through a
tie-up with a firm in India. It will
enhance price competitiveness in the overseas markets by improvement of
products and cost reduction. India &
Saudi Arabia are two of the main overseas markets. Three main demand sources are, domestic
public entities handling sewage facilities & others, domestic private firms
in the electric power, steels & other industries, in addition to overseas
companies in the crude oil, gas & electricity sectors in India & Saudi
Arabia.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The sales volume for Mar/2017 fiscal term amounted to Yen 18,275 million,
a 1.03% up from Yen 18,089 million in the previous term. The recurring profit was posted at Yen 1,433
million and the net profit at Yen 966 million, respectively, compared with Yen
1,223 million recurring profit and Yen 780 million net profit, respectively, a
year ago.
For the current term ending Mar 2018 the recurring profit is projected
at Yen 1,330 million and the net profit at Yen 890 million, respectively, on a
6.98% fall in turnover, to Yen 17,000 million.
The financial situation is considered FAIR and good for ORDINARY
business engagements.
REGISTRATION
Date Registered: Mar 1955
Regd No.: 0108-01-007581
(Tokyo-Otaku)
Legal Status: Limited Company (Kabushiki Kaisha)
Authorized: 19,107,800
million shares
Issued:
4,776,900 shares
Sum: Yen
810 million
Major shareholders
(%):
GM Investment Co (10.6), Company’s Treasury Stock (7.7), Customers’ S/Holding Assn (4.4), Mitsui
Sumitomo Insurance (4.2), Meiji Yasuda Life Ins (3.6), Tsurumi Mfg (2.7),
Meidensha Corp (2.6), Seisan Gijutsu Kenkyu Shorei (2.5), MUFG (2.1), Suido
Kiko (1.4); foreign owners (1.7)
No. of
shareholders: 3,129
Listed on the
S/Exchange (s) of: Tokyo (Second section)
Managements: Tadahiro
Tsuchiya, pres; Norio Hikosaka, mgn dir; Hideaki Murabayashi, mgn dir; Akira
Inagaki, dir; Hiroshi Sugiyama, dir; Muneo Uechi, dir
Nothing detrimental is known as
to the commercial morality of executives.
Related companies: Dengyosha Koji,
Eco Advance, other.
OPERATION
Activities: Manufactures industrial
pumps (69%), blowers (22%), valves (2%), water treatment systems, underwater
dredging robots, remote control systems, others (--7%)
Public Demand
Sector (63%), Domestic Private Demand Sector (20%)
Overseas Sales
Ratio (18%)
Clients: [Electric powers,
steel makers, governments, local governments] Toshiba Corp, Nippon Steel Corp,
Tokyo Electric Power, Chiyoda Corp, Hitachi Ltd, IHI Corp, other.
Exports to: USA, UK, Italy, Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Spain, Egypt,
India, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, other
No. of accounts: 1,000
Domestic areas of activities: Nationwide
Suppliers: [mfrs,
wholesalers] Moriya Corp, Iwaki Moritani Electric Ind, Metal One Specialty
Steel Corp, Yanmar Energy System, Mitsubishi Heavy Ind, Hitachi Ltd, Kyowa Engineering,
other
Payment record: Regular
Location: Business area in
Tokyo. Office premises at the caption
address are leased and maintained satisfactorily.
Bank References:
MUFG (Yotsuya)
SMBC (Omori)
Relations: Satisfactory
FINANCES
(In Million Yen)
|
Terms
Ending: |
31/03/2018 |
31/03/2017 |
31/03/2016 |
31/03/2015 |
|
|
Annual Sales |
|
17,000 |
18,275 |
18,089 |
17,814 |
|
Recur. Profit |
|
1,330 |
1,433 |
1,223 |
1,254 |
|
Net Profit |
|
890 |
966 |
780 |
761 |
|
Total Assets |
|
|
25,086 |
23,811 |
25,549 |
|
Current Assets |
|
|
18,986 |
17,891 |
18,062 |
|
Current Liabs |
|
|
7,593 |
7,138 |
7,616 |
|
Net Worth |
|
|
17,093 |
16,288 |
16,412 |
|
Capital, Paid-Up |
|
|
810 |
810 |
810 |
|
Div.Ttl in Million (¥) |
|
|
242,586 |
264,283 |
198,752 |
|
<Analytical Data> |
|
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
|
S.Growth Rate |
|
-6.98 |
1.03 |
1.54 |
-4.31 |
|
Current Ratio |
|
.. |
250.05 |
250.64 |
237.16 |
|
N.Worth Ratio |
|
.. |
68.14 |
68.41 |
64.24 |
|
R.Profit/Sales |
|
7.82 |
7.84 |
6.76 |
7.04 |
|
N.Profit/Sales |
|
5.24 |
5.29 |
4.31 |
4.27 |
|
Return On Equity |
|
.. |
5.65 |
4.79 |
4.64 |
Notes: Forecast (or
estimated) figures for the 31/03/2018 fiscal term.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
INR 64.85 |
|
|
1 |
INR 90.58 |
|
Euro |
1 |
INR 79.97 |
|
YEN |
1 |
INR 0.61 |
Note :
Above are approximate rates obtained from sources believed to be correct
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Analysis Done by
: |
VIV |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
TPT |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
Credit Rating |
Explanation |
Rating Comments |
|
A++ |
Minimum Risk |
Business dealings permissible with minimum
risk of default |
|
A+ |
Low Risk |
Business dealings permissible with low
risk of default |
|
A |
Acceptable Risk |
Business dealings permissible with
moderate risk of default |
|
B |
Medium Risk |
Business dealings permissible on a regular
monitoring basis |
|
C |
Medium High Risk |
Business dealings permissible preferably
on secured basis |
|
D |
High Risk |
Business dealing not recommended or on
secured terms only |
|
NB |
New Business |
No recommendation can be done due to
business in infancy stage |
|
NT |
No Trace |
No recommendation can be done as the
business is not traceable |
NB is stated where there is insufficient information to facilitate rating. However, it is not to be considered as unfavourable.
This score serves as a reference to assess
SC’s credit risk and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is
calculated from a composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major
sections of this report. The assessed factors are as follows:
·
Financial
condition covering various ratios
·
Company
background and operations size
·
Promoters
/ Management background
·
Payment
record
·
Litigation
against the subject
·
Industry
scenario / competitor analysis
·
Supplier
/ Customer / Banker review (wherever available)
This report is issued at
your request without any risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM
PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL) or its officials.