|
|
|
|
Report No. : |
495247 |
|
Report Date : |
06.03.2018 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
HAID CROPS SCIENCE |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
12, Al-Janat Homes, Sultanabad Colony, Gulgasht, Multan |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Pakistan |
|
|
|
|
Financials (as on) : |
2016 [Summarized] |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
October 2011 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Proprietorship |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
Import & Trading of Agricultural
Pesticide Products |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
About 3 |
RATING & COMMENTS
(Mira Inform has adopted New Rating mechanism w.e.f. 23rd
January 2017)
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
C |
|
Credit Rating |
Explanation |
Rating Comments |
|
C |
Medium High Risk |
Business dealings permissible preferably
on secured basis |
|
Status : |
Moderate |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Unknown |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (30.09.2017) |
Current Rating (31.12.2017) |
|
Pakistan |
B1 |
B1 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low Risk |
A2 |
|
Moderately Low Risk |
B1 |
|
Moderate Risk |
B2 |
|
Moderately High Risk |
C1 |
|
High Risk |
C2 |
|
Very High Risk |
D |
PAKISTAN - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
Decades of internal political disputes and low levels of foreign
investment have led to underdevelopment in Pakistan. Pakistan has a large
English-speaking population. A challenging security environment, electricity
shortages, and a burdensome investment climate have deterred investors.
Agriculture accounts for one-fifth of output and two-fifths of employment.
Textiles and apparel account for more than half of Pakistan's export earnings;
Pakistan's failure to diversify its exports has left the country vulnerable to
shifts in world demand. Pakistan’s GDP growth has gradually increased since
2012. Official unemployment was 6% in 2017, but this fails to capture the true
picture, because much of the economy is informal and underemployment remains
high. Human development continues to lag behind most of the region.
In 2013, Pakistan embarked on a $6.3 billion IMF Extended Fund Facility,
which focused on reducing energy shortages, stabilizing public finances,
increasing revenue collection, and improving its balance of payments position.
The program concluded in September 2016. Although Pakistan missed several
structural reform criteria, it restored macroeconomic stability, improved its
credit rating, and boosted growth. The Pakistani rupee, after heavy depreciation
in 2013, remained relatively stable against the US dollar in 2015-17. Balance
of payments concerns have reemerged, however, as a result of increased imports
and declining remittances.
Pakistan must continue to address several longstanding issues, including
expanding investment in education and healthcare, adapting to the effects of
climate change and natural disasters, improving the country’s business
environment, reducing dependence on foreign donors, and widening the country’s
tax base. Given demographic challenges, Pakistan’s leadership will be pressed
to implement economic reforms, promote further development of the energy
sector, and attract foreign investment to support sufficient economic growth
necessary to employ its growing and rapidly urbanizing population, much of
which is under the age of 25.
In an effort to boost development, Pakistan and China are implementing
the “China-Pakistan Economic Corridor,” with $60 billion in investments
targeted towards energy and other infrastructure projects. Pakistan believes
CPEC investments will enable growth rates of over 6% of GDP by laying the
groundwork for increased exports. CPEC-related obligations, however, have
raised IMF concern that capital outflows that will begin to increase in 2020.
|
Source
: CIA |
HAID
CROPS SCIENCE
|
Registered
Address |
|
12, Al-Janat Homes, Sultanabad Colony, Gulgasht, Multan, Pakistan |
|
Tel # |
92 (61) 6522176, +923006389620 |
|
Fax # |
92 (61) 6522176 |
|
a. |
Nature of Business |
Import & Trading of Agricultural
Pesticide Products |
|
b. |
Year Established |
October, 2011 |
None
|
Subject Company was established as a Proprietorship business in October, 2011 |
|
Names |
Nationality |
Address |
Occupation |
Designation |
|
Mr. Usman Anwar |
Pakistani |
12, Al-Janat Homes, Sultanabad Colony, Gulgasht, Multan |
Business |
CEO / Proprietor |
|
None |
Subject Company is engaged in import
& trading of Agricultural Pesticide Products.
It purchases against D/A
basis to its trade suppliers globally.
It sells against credit term basis to its domestic customers.
Subject import globally from Companies belongs to China.
Its major customers are Farmers, Trading Companies etc.
Subject operates from owned office premises located at residential area
of Multan, Punjab.
Subject employs about 3 persons in its set up.
|
Year |
In Pak Rupees |
|
2016 |
4,500,000/- (Estimated) |
|
Subject import globally from Companies belongs
to China. Its global trade suppliers are Companies related to Agricultural Pesticide Products as mention below: (1) JIANGSU HUANGMA
AGROCHEMICALS CO LTD, CHINA. (2) SHANDONG HUAYANG
PESTICIDE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, CHINA. (3) MOUNTAIN AGROCHEMICAL (PVT.) LTD, CHINA. |
|
(1) Habib Bank Limited, Pakistan. (2) Bank Alfalah Limited, Pakistan. (3) MCB Bank Limited, Pakistan. |
Subject Company was established in October 2011 and is engaged in import & trading of Agricultural
Pesticide Products. Trade relations
are not known. Such as conducting business activity with the subject is
considered to be a trade risk. In view of current disturbed
economic and political situation, we would advise to deal with all the business
in Pakistan at safe and secured trade terms and conditions.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
INR 65.05 |
|
|
1 |
INR 89.70 |
|
Euro |
1 |
INR 80.03 |
|
PKR |
1 |
INR 0.59 |
Note :
Above are approximate rates obtained from sources believed to be correct
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Analysis Done by
: |
VIV |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
TPT |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
Credit Rating |
Explanation |
Rating Comments |
|
A++ |
Minimum Risk |
Business dealings permissible with minimum
risk of default |
|
A+ |
Low Risk |
Business dealings permissible with low
risk of default |
|
A |
Acceptable Risk |
Business dealings permissible with
moderate risk of default |
|
B |
Medium Risk |
Business dealings permissible on a regular
monitoring basis |
|
C |
Medium High Risk |
Business dealings permissible preferably
on secured basis |
|
D |
High Risk |
Business dealing not recommended or on
secured terms only |
|
NB |
New Business |
No recommendation can be done due to
business in infancy stage |
|
NT |
No Trace |
No recommendation can be done as the
business is not traceable |
NB is stated where there is insufficient information to facilitate rating. However, it is not to be considered as unfavourable.
This score serves as a reference to assess
SC’s credit risk and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is
calculated from a composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major
sections of this report. The assessed factors are as follows:
·
Financial
condition covering various ratios
·
Company
background and operations size
·
Promoters
/ Management background
·
Payment
record
·
Litigation
against the subject
·
Industry
scenario / competitor analysis
·
Supplier
/ Customer / Banker review (wherever available)
This report is issued at
your request without any risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM
PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL) or its officials.