|
|
|
|
Report No. : |
509597 |
|
Report Date : |
23.05.2018 |
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
|
Name : |
PT. ISPAT PANCA PUTERA |
|
|
|
|
Registered Office : |
Kawasan Industri Gresik, Jl. Tridharma No. 3 Kav. D1-9/14-22 , Kelurahan Randuagung, Kecamatan Kebomas ,Kab. Gresik 61121 ,Jawa Timur |
|
|
|
|
Country : |
Indonesia |
|
|
|
|
Date of Incorporation : |
June 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Legal Form : |
Private Limited Liability Company or Perseroan Terbatas (PT) |
|
|
|
|
Line of Business : |
· Manufacture of basic iron and steel and of ferro-alloys · Manufacture of basic metals |
|
|
|
|
No. of Employees : |
320 |
RATING & COMMENTS
(Mira Inform has adopted New Rating mechanism w.e.f. 23rd
January 2017)
|
MIRA’s Rating : |
A |
|
Credit Rating |
Explanation |
Rating Comments |
|
A |
Acceptable Risk |
Business dealings permissible with
moderate risk of default |
|
Status : |
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
Payment Behaviour : |
Slow but Correct |
|
|
|
|
Litigation : |
Clear |
NOTES :
Any query related to this report can be made
on e-mail : infodept@mirainform.com
while quoting report number, name and date.
ECGC Country Risk Classification List
|
Country Name |
Previous Rating (30.09.2017) |
Current Rating (31.12.2017) |
|
Indonesia |
A2 |
A2 |
|
Risk Category |
ECGC
Classification |
|
Insignificant |
A1 |
|
Low Risk |
A2 |
|
Moderately Low Risk |
B1 |
|
Moderate Risk |
B2 |
|
Moderately High Risk |
C1 |
|
High Risk |
C2 |
|
Very High Risk |
D |
INDONESIA - ECONOMIC OVERVIEW
Indonesia, the largest economy in Southeast Asia, has seen a slowdown in growth since 2012, mostly due to the end of the commodities export boom. During the global financial crisis, Indonesia outperformed its regional neighbors and joined China and India as the only G20 members posting growth. Indonesia’s annual budget deficit is capped at 3% of GDP, and the Government of Indonesia lowered its debt-to-GDP ratio from a peak of 100% shortly after the Asian financial crisis in 1999 to 34% today. In May 2017 Standard & Poor’s became the last major ratings agency to upgrade Indonesia’s sovereign credit rating to investment grade.
Indonesia still struggles with poverty and unemployment, inadequate infrastructure, corruption, a complex regulatory environment, and unequal resource distribution among its regions. President Joko WIDODO - elected in July 2014 – seeks to develop Indonesia’s maritime resources and pursue other infrastructure development, including significantly increasing its electrical power generation capacity. Fuel subsidies were significantly reduced in early 2015, a move which has helped the government redirect its spending to development priorities. Indonesia, with the nine other ASEAN members, will continue to move towards participation in the ASEAN Economic Community, though full implementation of economic integration has not yet materialized.
|
Source
: CIA |
|
Company Name |
PT. Ispat Panca Putera |
|
|
|
|
Address |
Kawasan Industri Gresik, Jl.
Tridharma No. 3 Kav. D1-9/14-22 |
|
|
|
|
Telephone |
+62313970609, +62313974191 |
|
Fax |
+62313972762 |
|
Mobile Phone |
N.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
info@ispatpanca.com |
|
Web |
www.ispatindo.com/OtherPanca.htm |
PROFILE |
|
Address |
Kawasan Industri Gresik, Jl.
Tridharma No. 3 Kav. D1-9/14-22 |
||||
|
|
|||||
|
Office Building |
|
||||
|
Date of Establishment |
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
Start Operation |
2007 |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Legal Status |
Private Limited Liability Company or Perseroan Terbatas (PT) |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Legalization (historical) |
No. AHU-AH.01.10-39536 |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Government Permit (s) |
Direktorat Jenderal Pajak |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Significant change |
PT.
Ispat Panca Putera (the Company) was established in Jakarta Barat - DKI
Jakarta on June 2006. Up to the completion of this report, however, we are
unable to obtain establishment act of the Company; so that we cannot show you
details about its first capitalization and shareholder structure. Per
July 27, 2013, the Company’s authorized capital amounted to IDR
500,000,000,000 –of which IDR 434,750,000,000 was issued and paid up by PT.
Ispat Indo (99.000%) and PT. Ispat Wire Products (1.000%). On
October 4, 2017, the Company issued a revision notarial act, yet without
changing its capitalization and shareholder structure Up
to the completion of this report, there has been no more change in the
Company’s notarial act. |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Capitalization |
|
|
Shareholders |
Total No. of Shareholders: 2 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Name of Shareholders |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Management Board |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Name |
Mr. Baldeo Prasad Banka |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Position |
Director |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Nationality |
Indian |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Name |
Mr. Sunil Kumar Jaju |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Position |
Director |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Nationality |
Indian |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Name |
Ms. Annisa Radhiana Hasan |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Position |
Director |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Nationality |
Indonesian |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Name |
Ms. Nur Saidah |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Position |
Director |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Nationality |
Indonesian |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Name |
Mr. Ashok Dutta |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Position |
Director |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Nationality |
Indian |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Supervisory Board |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Name |
Mr. Herman Hasan Basri |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Position |
Commissioner |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Nationality |
Indonesian |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Management Assessment |
The
management is deemed to have sufficient experience and industry expertise to
manage subject properly. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Authorized Signatories |
Mr. Baldeo Prasad Banka, Ms. Nur Saidah,
Ms. Annisa Radhiana Hasan, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jaju and Mr. Ashok Dutta as
Directors, which must be approved by shareholders meeting. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Affiliate (s) / Associate (s) |
|
|
Registered Activities |
SIC Code 24 : Manufacture of basic metals |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Employee |
Per 2018 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Business Category |
SIC Code 24.1 : Manufacture of basic iron
and steel and of ferro-alloys |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Line of Business |
SIC Code 24.10 : Manufacture of basic iron
and steel and of ferro-alloys |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Product & Capacity |
- Round Bars and Deformed Bars - 300,000 MT p.a. |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Status of Investment |
Foreign-invested Company |
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
Sales Territory |
Local |
80% |
||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
International |
20% |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
Main Items Imported |
Machinery |
Japan |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
Main Items Exported |
Steel Bars |
Australia |
||
|
|
|
|||
|
Major Customers |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Major Supplier |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Terms of Payment |
Purchase Payment |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Activity Comment |
PT. Ispat Panca Putera (the Company) is a foreign-invested company
that is engaged in steel industry. The Company began operation in 2007. Head
office, registered address and factory of the Company are located at Kawasan
Industri Gresik, Jl. Tridharma No. 3 Kav. D1-9/14-22, Kelurahan Randuagung,
Kecamatan Kebomas, Kab. Gresik 61121, Jawa Timur - Indonesia. We believe this
location is leased by the Company for long term time period. The factory is
situated on 6.4 hectares of land. The Company is a member of India-based groups, particularly
ArcelorMittal Group that is one of the world’s leading steel and mining
groups in India. ArcelorMittal Group has all major markets including
automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging. ArcelorMittal
is present in 60 countries and has an industrial footprint in 19 countries. Based on our investigation, the Company is engaged in Steel Industry,
producing Round Bars and Deformed Bars, with annual installed capacity of
around 300,000 Mt. The Company is known as one of the largest Bar Mills in
Indonesia. As additional info, the current production utilization of the Company
is only 60%. For this reason, the Company is still potential to increase its
actual production capacity. The Company produces High Tensile round and Plain Bars. Its main
products are 12-45 mm round and deformed bars, billet materials with 140/140
mm and 150-150 mm x 4 m length. Some of the Company’s products are as follows: • Round Bar 12 mm - 45 mm • Deformed Bar 12 mm - 45 mm • Shafting Bar 12 mm - 80 mm For the production process, the Company uses some raw materials from
local market, particularly billet materials from its holding PT. Ispat Indo.
The Company also uses some raw materials from overseas market particularly
China, and some machineries from Japan and Germany. In present time, the
percentage of metal materials used by the Company for its production
activities is similar, namely 50:50 for local and imported materials. For purchase payment, the Company uses Telegraphic Transfer (T.T) with
credit term of up to 30 days, both with local and overseas suppliers.
Meanwhile for sales transaction, the Company applies advance payment with
Telegraphic Transfer (T.T), both with local and overseas customers. So this,
the Company has not faced any payment default either from its customers or to
its suppliers. The Company’s products are 20% exported, such as to Australia,
Malaysia, etc. Meanwhile the other 80% are marketed in domestic market. One
of its major customers in domestic market is PT. Hanwa Steel Service
Indonesia. The Company’s steel products are applicable for various business
and industrial sectors, such as infrastructure, automotive industry, general
construction, and so on. In addition, the Company already received ISO 9001 certification and
ISO 14001 certification. The Company also already received other
certifications, such as from Lloyd`s Register Quality Assurance, UKAS Quality
Management, UKAS Environmental Management, SNI Certificate with SNI Approval
Certificate: SNI 07-2052-2002, SMK3, etc. According to our source, depreciation of rupiah has affected to the
Company’s financial performance, particularly to their profit, since the
Company uses some imported materials. Apart from the situations, however,
regarding the market demand in 2015, the Company’s sales performance remained
stable. Along the year 2016, in fact, to meet the increasing demand in local
and overseas market, the Company produced around 12,000 - 13,000 tons of
steel products per month in quarter I 2016. Meanwhile in quarter II until the
end of 2016, the Company produced around 13,000 - 15,000 tons of steel
products per month. In 2017, the Company was still able to book positive performance, yet
not significantly increasing. Currently, the Company is supported by approximately 320 employees, or
increasing by some 15 employees if compared to the number of employees in
2016. As information, based on news in mass media in 2015, we found that
legal status of the Company’s factory building that stands on some 20,000sqm
of land is unclear. It is because there is a party who claims that the
20,000sqm land is a part of 70,650 sqm land belonged to the late Mr. Kohir
bin Abdoel Majid. According to Rozi, heir of Mr. Kohir bin Abdoel Majid, the 70,650sqm
land that is located in Karesidenan Surabaya, precisely at Randu Agung
Kebomas Gresik, was belonged to NV. De Bataafsche Petrolium Maatschappj (an
oil company) with Sigendom Verponding Letter No. 19409. Meanwhile, based on Akta Hibah No. 145/02/1942 that was made before a
public notary, EH. Carpentier Alting, NV. De Bataafsche Petrolium Maatschappj
had granted the land property on September 15, 1931, Certificate Ukur No.
170/16-08-1930, to Mr. Kohir (as the grantee). Initially, according to Rozi, PT. Ispat Panca Putra occupied the land
under a tenancy scheme. Yet, up to present time, the heirs have never
received any money from the tenancy. Up to the completion of this report,
however, we are unable to find info about progress of the case. So far, this
case is not registered at the court information system in Gresik. |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Litigation |
Based on the case No: 36/PDT.G/2015/PN GSK, the Company became the
Plaintiff against KOden International Co, Ltd as the Defendant. The case
classification is "rent-lease". Final decision of the court toward
the case is as follow: 1. to state that the Defendant had been legally summoned, but not
present in the court; 2. to grant the Plaintiff partially, with Verstek; 3. to state that the sales contract made by the plaintiff and the
defendant is legally binding. 4. to punish the Defendant to pay compensations of : - material compensation: USD225,000 or equivalent to IDR.
2,995,425,000, in accordance to the exchange rate dated May 20 2015, (@USD1=
Rp. 13,313,-). 5. to punish the defendant to pay the court cost of Rp.601,000. 6. to refuse the other claim of the Plaintiff. Meanwhile, based on the case No. 4/PHI/2015/PN GSK, the Company became
the Defendant against Asish Ramesh Kapoor as the Plaintiff. The case
classification is "unilateral dismissal dispute". Yet, final
decision of the court over the case is unknown. |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Factory and Registered Address |
Kawasan Industri Gresik, Jl. Tridharma No.
3 Kav. D1-9/14-22 |
|||
|
Banker (s) |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Insurance |
|
BUSINESS PROSPECTS |
|
Business Prospects
|
Domestic
demand for steel in 2018 is estimated to reach 14.5 million tons. The demand
is 7% higher than 2017s demand of 13.5 million tons. Executive Director of
the Indonesian Iron and Steel Industry Association (IISIA) stated the positive
projection encourages multinational steel manufacturers to start investing in
Indonesia by 2018. In 2018, steel demand is expected to increase by 800,000
tons in Indonesia. On
the other hand, although it is predicted to increase national steel industry
players still face high gas and electricity tariff constraints and government
policies that have not been aligned with the local players in the business.
Thus, the national steel industry players hope that the constraints can be
minimized by the government for 2018 steel production in accordance with the
target. Based
on information shown above, we believe that the stainless consumption in 2018
will increase. This will bring positive effect for the Company, regardless
challenges in steel industry. |
|
Sales Turn Over |
2013 - IDR 217,000,000,000 (Estimated) |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
As the Company is not a publicly listed company, we are unable to give
a detailed picture of the financial condition of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data |
As the Company is
not a publicly listed company, we are unable to give a detailed picture of
the financial condition of the Company. |
|
Management Capability |
Adequate |
|
|
|
|
Business Morality |
Adequate |
|
|
|
|
Payment Manner |
Slow but Correct |
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition
|
Satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
Operating Trend |
Up |
|
|
|
|
Conclusive remarks
|
The Company has
been operating in steel industry since 2007, producing Round Bars and
Deformed Bars. The Company is a member of India-based groups, particularly
ArcelorMittal Group of India, which is one of the world’s leading steel and
mining groups. ArcelorMittal Group has all major markets including
automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging. ArcelorMittal
is present in 60 countries and has an industrial footprint in 19 countries.
With only 60% production utilization in present time, the Company is still
potential to increase its actual production performance, in line with the
increasing steel consumption in domestic and overseas market. In term of sales
performance, the depreciation of rupiah has affected to the Company’s financial
performance, particularly to their profit, since the Company uses some
imported materials. Apart from the situations, however, regarding the market
demand in 2015, the Company’s sales performance remained stable. In 2016 and
2017, performance of the Company was also positive. In another side, in term
of payment method with their customers, it appears that the Company is able
to anticipate the trade-receivable risk properly; so that the risk to
suppliers can be reduced. Related to the
Company’s qualified business capability, adequate financial condition, and
good business prospect, we rate the Company's credit opinion to "medium
risk". It is because steel industry in Indonesia is also not free from
challenges. As we learn, high electricity and gas tariffs are still a high
challenge for steel industry in Indonesia. For security
reason, nevertheless, we advise those wishing to make cooperation with and to
grant loans to the Company to ask for adequate collateral from the owners and
management. |
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
|
Currency |
Unit
|
Indian Rupees |
|
US Dollar |
1 |
INR 68.02 |
|
|
1 |
INR 91.25 |
|
Euro |
1 |
INR 80.07 |
|
IDR |
1 |
INR 0.0048 |
Note :
Above are approximate rates obtained from sources believed to be correct
INFORMATION DETAILS
|
Analysis Done by
: |
NIY |
|
|
|
|
Report Prepared
by : |
KET |
RATING EXPLANATIONS
|
Credit Rating |
Explanation |
Rating Comments |
|
A++ |
Minimum Risk |
Business dealings permissible with minimum
risk of default |
|
A+ |
Low Risk |
Business dealings permissible with low
risk of default |
|
A |
Acceptable Risk |
Business dealings permissible with
moderate risk of default |
|
B |
Medium Risk |
Business dealings permissible on a regular
monitoring basis |
|
C |
Medium High Risk |
Business dealings permissible preferably
on secured basis |
|
D |
High Risk |
Business dealing not recommended or on
secured terms only |
|
NB |
New Business |
No recommendation can be done due to
business in infancy stage |
|
NT |
No Trace |
No recommendation can be done as the
business is not traceable |
NB is stated where there is insufficient information to facilitate rating. However, it is not to be considered as unfavourable.
This score serves as a reference to assess
SC’s credit risk and to set the amount of credit to be extended. It is
calculated from a composite of weighted scores obtained from each of the major
sections of this report. The assessed factors are as follows:
·
Financial
condition covering various ratios
·
Company
background and operations size
·
Promoters
/ Management background
·
Payment
record
·
Litigation
against the subject
·
Industry
scenario / competitor analysis
·
Supplier
/ Customer / Banker review (wherever available)
This report is issued at
your request without any risk and responsibility on the part of MIRA INFORM
PRIVATE LIMITED (MIPL) or its officials.